Former top intel chiefs silent after Musk Twitter disclosures

America’s top former intelligence officials were silent Saturday after the release of internal Twitter documents detailing how The Post’s bombshell revelations were censored by the social media company.

Leon Panetta, a former CIA director and defense secretary, John Brennan a former CIA director, Mike Hayden, a former CIA director, and Jim Clapper, a former director of national intelligence — who all once said The Post’s reporting had “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation,” — declined or did not respond to request for comment about whether the latest disclosures had changed their opinion.

A public statement was made in regard to the Hunter Biden emails.
A picture of Director of National Intelligence James Clapper.
James Clapper and other former intelligence officials were silent after the release of internal Twitter documents detailing how The Post’s bombshell revelations were censored.
AFP via Getty Images

The quartet made their allegations as part of an open letter denigrating The Post’s reporting as Russian misinformation which was signed by dozens of other longtime intelligence hands.

“Our experience makes us deeply suspicious that the Russian government played a significant role in this case,” the letter read. “If we are right, this is Russia trying to influence how Americans vote in this election, and we believe strongly that Americans need to be aware of this.”

A picture of Clinton White House Chief of Staff and Obama administration's Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta.
Leon Panetta, a former CIA director, and defense secretary declined to respond about whether the latest disclosures changed his mind.

A picture of John Brennan, Former CIA Director.
John Brennan, a former CIA director, once said The Post’s reporting had “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”

A picture of CIA Director Michael Hayden.
Mike Hayden, a former CIA director, has not commented on the latest disclosures.

Of the four, only Clapper has ever publicly addressed the letter, offering a vigorous defense to The Post in March.

“Yes, I stand by the statement made AT THE TIME, and would call attention to its 5th paragraph,” he said referring to an area of the letter where the signatories admit they do not have any material evidence of Russian involvement. “I think sounding such a cautionary note AT THE TIME was appropriate.”

Read original article here

Leave a Comment