Tag Archives: White

White House says Biden has agreed to meet with Putin ‘in principle’ as long as Russia does not invade Ukraine

The meeting, according to press secretary Jen Psaki, would occur after US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov meet on February 24.

Still, in a statement, Psaki appeared to downplay the prospects of a meeting actually materializing given what US officials have said the high likelihood is Putin could launch an invasion soon. And other US officials made clear no plans — either on timing, format or location — currently exist for the two leaders to meet.

“We are always ready for diplomacy. We are also ready to impose swift and severe consequences should Russia instead choose war. And currently, Russia appears to be continuing preparations for a full-scale assault on Ukraine very soon,” Psaki said in a statement on Sunday night.

The proposed summit, according to an Élysée Palace statement, was proposed by French President Emmanuel Macron during back-to-back phone calls with Biden and Putin on Sunday.

However, speaking to journalists on Monday morning, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said there were “no concrete plans” for a meeting between the two presidents.

“A substantive understanding has been reached that it is necessary to continue dialogue at the ministers’ level. It is too early to talk about concrete plans for organizing summits,” Peskov said, adding: “Of course, we do not rule out that, if necessary, the presidents of Russia and US can make a decision at any time to have contacts, by telephone or in person. It will be their decision.”

During the same call, Peskov announced that Putin would hold a large, previously unscheduled sitting of the Russian Security Council on Monday. The spokesperson said the meeting was “not regular” and refused to elaborate further on its agenda.

Macron has emerged as a diplomatic go-between of sorts as the crisis in Europe unfolds. He met Putin earlier this month in Moscow, and spoke to the Russian leader by phone twice on Sunday. French officials have said his efforts at diplomacy reflect a desire to explore every available pathway that avoids conflict.

The French presidency’s statement said the summit would be followed by a subsequent gathering of “relevant stakeholders to discuss security and strategic stability in Europe.” Macron “will work with all stakeholders to prepare the content of these discussions.”

It did not specify who those stakeholders were.

US officials have consistently said Biden is willing to engage with Putin, even as he prepares withering economic sanctions should another Russian invasion of Ukraine transpire.

“President Biden is prepared to engage President Putin at any time, in any format, if that can help prevent a war,” Blinken said Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union.”
Biden has placed a premium on meeting leaders face-to-face and met Putin in June during a summit in Geneva. The two last spoke by phone last Saturday.

American officials have said deciphering Putin’s intentions is difficult as he masses troops along Ukraine’s borders. They say he has kept his plans veiled from even his most senior advisers.

On Sunday, a White House official said Blinken and Lavrov would discuss a possible summit between Biden and Putin when they meet later this week in Europe but added a note of caution about those talks.

“Blinken and Lavrov will discuss further if the invasion hasn’t started by then — in which case it’s all off,” the official said.

Exercises in Belarus continue

Macron’s effort to advance a potential diplomatic breakthrough comes as Belarusian officials announced Sunday that joint Russian military exercises in Belarus that were slated to end over the weekend would continue, implying that Russian forces may extend their stay.

New satellite images meanwhile showed intensified activity among Russian units close to Ukraine’s north-eastern border and the Ukrainian Defense ministry said it recorded dozens of ceasefire violations on Sunday.

Defense minister Oleksii Reznikov said Monday that Ukraine was not seeing any withdrawal of Russian forces from positions close to the border.

“We are observing the Russian units, which number today 127,000 people on the ground component, and with the naval and aviation component 147,000 people,” Reznikov said.

The Ukrainian Joint Forces Command on Sunday claimed Russian-backed separatists launched “heavy armament fire” against their own territory in an effort to “falsely accuse the armed forces of Ukraine and further escalate the situation.”

Russia and Ukraine continued exchanging accusations on Monday. Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) said in a statement that a shell fired from Ukrainian territory had destroyed a border guard post in Russia’s southern Rostov region.

Ukrainian border authorities responded by describing the FSB statement as “deliberate provocation,” while Oleksiy Danilov, the head of Ukraine’s National Security Council, said Ukraine had “nothing to do with these attacks.”

“Our military can only fire back if there is a threat to the lives of our military. We are not shelling,” Danilov added Monday.

On Sunday, Biden held a National Security Council meeting with his top advisers. Also on Sunday, two US officials and another source familiar with US intelligence told CNN a US intelligence assessment indicated orders had been sent to Russian commanders to proceed with an attack on Ukraine. The intelligence was learned last week and informed comments by Biden and Blinken, according to another US official.

However, pushing back on the reports, Russian Ambassador to the US Anatoly Antonov on Sunday told CBS “Face the Nation” that, “there is no invasion and there is no such plan.”

Read original article here

Trump took classified material from White House to Florida, National Archives says

WASHINGTON, Feb 18 (Reuters) – Former President Donald Trump took classified information to his Florida home after leaving the White House, the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration said in a letter to Congress on Friday about the 15 boxes of documents it recently recovered.

The Archives said it had informed the Department of Justice, which would handle any investigation.

“NARA has identified items marked as classified national security information within the boxes,” David Ferriero, the archivist of the United States, said in a letter to Democratic U.S. Representative Carolyn Maloney, chair of the House of Representatives oversight committee.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Maloney’s committee has been looking into Trump’s handling of records by the Republican president, who left office in January 2021.

“These new revelations deepen my concern about former President Trump’s flagrant disregard for federal records laws and the potential impact on our historical record,” Maloney said in a statement.

“The National Archives did not ‘find’ anything, they were given, upon request, presidential records in an ordinary and routine process to ensure the preservation of my legacy and in accordance with the Presidential Records Act,” Trump said in a written statement.

“If this was anyone but “Trump,” there would be no story here.”

The letter from Ferriero also said that some White House staff conducted official business using nonofficial electronic messaging accounts that were not copied or forwarded into official electronic messaging accounts and that it was in the process of obtaining some of those missing records.

The Washington Post reported last week that some of the documents taken to Trump’s home were marked as classified, which could intensify the legal pressure Trump or his aides could face.

The Presidential Records Act requires the preservation of memos, letters, notes, emails, faxes and other written communications related to a president’s official duties.

Claiming executive privilege, Trump sued unsuccessfully to stop the release of records from his White House, including to the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol by Trump supporters.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Patricia Zengerle; Additional reporting by Dan Whitcombl Editing by Scott Malone, Jonathan Oatis & Simon Cameron-Moore

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

American Woman Appears to Be Entirely Cured of HIV After Unique Medical Treatment

Ten years ago, an unnamed American woman was diagnosed with HIV. Like the tens of thousands of people who test positive in the US each year, she faced a lifetime of anti-retroviral therapies to keep the virus from obliterating her immune system.

 

Today, that’s no longer the case.

The patient is part of an extremely exclusive club of individuals who appear to have purged the virus entirely from their bodies. What’s more, the means to her cure gives hope to dozens of patients like her each year.

A team of researchers in the US working as part of the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network (IMPAACT) recently reported the middle-aged patient to be virus-free more than four years after a revolutionary treatment for blood cancer.

Just two other cases of total HIV remission have ever been satisfactorily confirmed, both following transplants of bone marrow from donors with HIV-blocking mutations in treatment of leukemia.

One, a Caucasian male known as the “Berlin patient”, was in remission for more than a decade before passing away in 2020 from his cancer. The other, a Latino male dubbed the “London patient”, has been virus-free now for more than two years.

Just like these two renowned patients, the woman at the center of this latest case was also diagnosed with a blood cancer. In 2017, tests confirmed she had acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), a life-threatening condition affecting bone marrow.

 

Had the woman been White, she would have had a higher chance of finding a tissue match within the Caucasian-dominated library of willing donors.

Instead, given her mixed-race heritage, specialists turned to another source of stem cells that could potentially provide the seeds for new, healthy bone marrow – umbilical cord blood.

Unlike most tissue transplants, blood from a newborn’s umbilicus doesn’t require a perfect immunological match between the host and donor. Since the 1990s, more than 35,000 leukemia patients around the world have received a cord blood donation.

While it’s a prime choice of treatment for AML, cord blood takes weeks to settle in and generate sufficient white cells to keep infections at bay. This makes it a rather poor option for anybody dealing with a persistent deadly infection.

To circumvent this problem, the patient’s medical team devised a two-pronged strategy – receive infusions of blood from a compatible relative to provide her with a temporary defense, and cord stem cells that can slowly generate white cells.

As an added fortune, the cord cells the patient received came with a bonus talent. Their DNA carried two copies of the CCR5 delta-32 mutation.

 

This small genetic difference alters the expression of the CCR5 co-receptor, the doorway most strains of HIV use to gain entry into the body’s cells. Without easy access into white blood cells, the virus can’t slide inside and destroy them.

Around three months after her transplant, all of the patient’s T white blood cells and myeloid cells (white cells that gobble up invaders) were derived not from her old marrow, or her relative’s blood, but from the stem cells in the cord blood.

That means they all featured the protective version of the CCR5 co-receptor, locking out her HIV for good.

Since then the patient has stopped all anti-retroviral medication, showing no signs of active HIV particles.

Cord blood stem cells have a lot going for them as a form of leukemia therapy, compared with more traditional forms of blood stem cells from a donor. For one thing, there appears to be a reduced risk of relapse.

What’s more, side-effects that are common among marrow transplants, such as graft versus host disease, are less likely. In fact, the patient in this case left hospital just 17 days after her treatment.

 

Most excitingly, the fact that umbilical cord blood is more forgiving in terms of compatibility between donors and hosts means people from diverse ethnic and racial backgrounds could at last be eligible.

The researchers presented their preliminary findings at the 2022 Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, though are yet to publish or make their research publicly available.

For now, the study poses an exciting possibility for curing a fraction of the people with HIV – an ongoing pandemic that currently affects almost 40 million people around the globe.

This isn’t to say this new therapy would be available to all people living with HIV, at least not any time soon. The risks involved still mean it’s an option only available for treating life-threatening blood cancers, with the chance of curing HIV a prospective bonus.

But for those handfuls of eligible patients hit with both a cancer and HIV diagnosis, it’s a thin silver lining that gives hope for a slightly brighter future.

 

Read original article here

Dana White calls Joe Rogan schedule conflict ‘bulls***’

The plot has thickened around Joe Rogan’s conspicuous absence from UFC 271.

The UFC broadcast stalwart, currently embroiled in controversy over what some have called vaccine misinformation and use of racial slurs on his popular podcast, was reported as having to miss Saturday’s event due to a “scheduling conflict.”

After the event, UFC president Dana White was asked about Rogan’s absence. He painted the decision for Rogan not to work entirely as Rogan’s choice, but said he didn’t know why. He also used some coarse language to react to the idea Rogan wasn’t allowed to work.

“There’s no conflict of schedule. Joe Rogan didn’t work tonight. Joe Rogan could have worked tonight … I don’t know what Joe Rogan had to do, you guys will have to ask Joe Rogan. There was no ‘Joe couldn’t work tonight’ or anything like that. I know that came out, it’s total bulls***.”

Former UFC middleweight champion Michael Bisping filled in for Rogan alongside play-by-play man Jon Anik and former heavyweight champ Daniel Cormier.

Whatever kept him away from the broadcast table, Rogan was apparently still watching, as Anik mentioned he received a text from Rogan during the main event between Israel Adesanya and Robert Whittaker, in which he speculated about a hand injury sustained by Adesanya.

Joe Rogan’s tidal wave of controversy

Last week, Rogan issued an apology for past things said on his podcast and said his use of racial slurs was “regretful and shameful,” though he also said on the same podcast this week that the controversy was a “political hit job.”

Spotify, which paid more than $100 million for the right to air Rogan’s “The Joe Rogan Experience,” has pulled over 100 episodes of the podcast and will start including disclaimers before future episodes.

Speculation was rampant around Rogan’s absence for obvious reasons, most notably the possibility that ESPN, which aired UFC 271, and parent company Disney did not want such a divisive figure on their broadcast. YouTuber-turned-boxer Jake Paul, never one to avoid needling the UFC, even claimed that Disney should have pulled White instead.

This is obviously not the first time the comedian has courted controversy, though that never seemed to hurt his relationship with the UFC and White in the past. Rogan has been working for the promotion since UFC 12 in 1997 and started calling fights in 2002.

Joe Rogan and the UFC go way back. (Photo by Jeff Bottari/Zuffa LLC/Zuffa LLC via Getty Images)



Read original article here

What a Russian invasion of Ukraine would mean for markets as White House warns attack could come ‘any day now’

Investors on Friday got a taste of the sort of market shock that could come if Russia invades Ukraine.

The spark came as Jake Sullivan, the White House national security adviser, warned Friday afternoon that Russia could attack Ukraine “any day now,” with Russia’s military prepared to begin an invasion if ordered by Russian President Vladimir Putin.

U.S. stocks extended a selloff to end sharply lower, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average
DJIA,
-1.43%
dropping more than 500 points and the S&P 500
SPX,
-1.90%
sinking 1.9%; oil futures
CL.1,
+0.86%
surged to a seven-year high that has crude within hailing distance of $100 a barrel; and a round of buying interest in traditional safe-haven assets pulled down Treasury yields while lifting gold, the U.S. dollar and the Japanese yen.

Putin and U.S. President Joe Biden were slated to talk by phone Saturday in an effort to defuse tensions.

Analysts and investors have debated the lasting effects of an invasion on financial markets. Here’s what investors need to know.

Energy prices set to surge

Energy prices are expected to soar in the event of an invasion, likely sending the price of crude above the $100-a-barrel threshold for the first time since 2014.

“I think if a war breaks out between Russia and Ukraine, $100 a barrel will be almost assured,” Phil Flynn, market analyst at Price Futures Group, told MarketWatch. U.S. benchmark oil futures
CL00,
+0.86%

CLH22,
+0.86%
ended at a seven-year high of $93.10 on Friday, while Brent crude
BRN00,
+0.70%

BRNJ22,
+0.70%,
” the global benchmark closed at $94.44 a barrel.

“More than likely we will spike hard and then drop. The $100-a-barrel area is more likely because inventories are tightest they have been in years,” Flynn said, explaining that a monthly report Friday from the International Energy Agency warning that the crude market was set to tighten further makes any potential supply disruption “all that more ominous.”

Beyond crude, Russia’s role as a key supplier of natural gas to Western Europe could send prices in the region soaring. Overall, spiking energy prices in Europe and around the world would be the most likely way a Russian invasion would stoke volatility across financial markets, analysts said.

Fed vs. flight to quality

Treasurys are among the most popular havens for investors during bouts of geopolitical uncertainty, so it was no surprise to see yields slide across the curve Friday afternoon. Treasury yields, which move the opposite direction of prices, were vulnerable to a pullback after surging Thursday in the wake of a hotter-than-expected January inflation report that saw traders price in aggressive rate increases by the Federal Reserve beginning with a potential half-point hike in March.

Analysts and investors debated how fighting in Ukraine could affect the Federal Reserve’s plans for tightening monetary policy.

If Ukraine is attacked “it adds more credence to our view that the Fed will be more dovish than the market currently believes as the war would make the outlook even more uncertain,” said Jay Hatfield, chief investment officer at Infrastructure Capital Management, in emailed comments.

Others argued that a jump in energy prices would be likely to underline the Fed’s worries over inflation.

Stocks and geopolitics

Uncertainty and the resulting volatility could make for more rough sledding for stocks in the near term, but analysts noted that U.S. equities have tended to get over geopolitical shocks relatively quickly.

“You can’t minimize what today’s news could mean on that part of the world and the people impacted, but from an investment point of view we need to remember that major geopolitical events historically haven’t moved stocks much,” said Ryan Detrick, chief market strategist at LPL Financial, in a note, pointing to the chart below:


LPL Financial

Indeed, the takeaway from past geopolitical crises may be that it’s best not to sell into a panic, wrote MarketWatch columnist Mark Hulbert in September.

He noted data compiled by Ned Davis Research examining the 28 worst political or economic crises over the six decades before the 9/11 attacks in 2001. In 19 cases, the Dow was higher six months after the crisis began. The average six-month gain following all 28 crises was 2.3%. In the aftermath of 9/11, which left markets closed for several days, the Dow fell 17.5% at its low but recovered to trade above its Sept. 10 level by Oct. 26, six weeks later.

Read original article here

Shaun White comes up short of medal in Olympic men’s halfpipe, final competition of his career – USA TODAY

  1. Shaun White comes up short of medal in Olympic men’s halfpipe, final competition of his career USA TODAY
  2. Team USA snowboarding legend Shaun White crashes out on final Olympic run CNN
  3. ‘It’s a Travesty’: NBC Announcer SHREDS Shockingly Low Halfpipe Score, Says Judges ‘Grenade’d All of Their Credibility’ Mediaite
  4. Snowboarder Shaun White places fourth in halfpipe in final Olympics competition, Japan’s Ayumu Hirano wins gold ESPN
  5. Shaun White’s Physical Therapist Says Secret to His Success Is More than Just Pushing It in the Gym PEOPLE
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

U.S. lawmakers probe Trump’s handling of White House records

WASHINGTON, Feb 10 (Reuters) – A U.S. congressional committee is investigating former President Donald Trump’s handling of White House records after 15 boxes of documents were transferred from his Florida resort to a federal agency, including whether the material included classified information, the panel’s chairwoman said on Thursday.

House of Representatives Oversight Committee Chairwoman Carolyn Maloney said in a statement she was “deeply concerned” that the records were not promptly turned over to the National Archives when Trump’s term ended in January 2021 and “that they appear to have been removed from the White House in violation of the Presidential Records Act.”

Maloney, a Democrat, also expressed concern over U.S. media reports that Trump “repeatedly attempted to destroy presidential records, which could constitute additional serious violations” of that law, which requires the preservation of written communications related to a president’s official duties.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

An upcoming book written by New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman said staffers found documents clogging Trump’s toilet in the White House during his tenure – an account that the Republican former president in a statement called “categorically false.”

“Staff in the White House would periodically find the toilet clogged” and would then find “wads of clumped up, wet printed paper … either notes or some other piece of paper that they believe he had thrown down the toilet” in his bathroom, Haberman told CNN, adding it was unclear what types of documents were found.

In his statement, Trump acknowledged the boxes of records were sent to the Archives after discussions he called collaborative. Trump said he had been told he “was under no obligation” to hand over any White House materials, though he did not say who gave him that directive, which was at odds with the law.

“The papers were given easily and without conflict and on a very friendly basis,” Trump said.

The Washington Post reported on Wednesday that the National Archives and Records Administration, the federal agency responsible for preserving government records, has asked the U.S. Justice Department to investigate Trump’s handling of White House records.

The Justice Department did not respond to a request for comment on whether it would investigate. The National Archives said it would not comment on potential or ongoing investigations.

In a report on Thursday, the Post, citing two unnamed people familiar with the matter, said some of the documents Trump took to his Florida resort were clearly marked as classified, including documents at the “top secret” level.

The Archives in a statement on Monday said it had arranged for the transfer of 15 boxes of memos, letters and other documents from Trump’s private resort in Florida in mid-January, a month after a Trump representative reporting locating them.

The Archives also said it had worked with Trump representatives throughout last year to locate presidential records that had not been transferred to the agency.

Maloney said she asked the Archives whether it checked for and found any classified documents in the 15 boxes, whether it was aware of any other missing records from Trump’s administration and whether it had notified the U.S. attorney general. She also asked if the Archives was aware of any records destroyed by Trump without its approval, and any actions to recover or preserve them, giving the agency until Feb. 18 to respond.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Susan Heavey and Doina Chiacu; Editing by Will Dunham, Chizu Nomiyama, Nick Zieminski and Raju Gopalakrishnan

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Investigators Find Gaps in White House Logs of Trump’s Jan. 6 Calls

Early on in his administration, Mr. Trump was known to use the cellphone belonging to Keith Schiller, his personal body guard at Trump Tower and later the director of Oval Office operations, for some of his calls. It meant the White House call logs were often an incomplete reflection of his contacts.

After the Supreme Court ruled against Mr. Trump’s efforts to block the release of hundreds of pages of presidential records, the National Archives turned over to the House panel investigating the riot voluminous documents that included daily presidential diaries, schedules, appointment information showing visitors to the White House, activity logs, call logs, and switchboard shift-change checklists showing calls to Mr. Trump and Mr. Pence on Jan. 6.

The committee has learned in recent weeks that Mr. Trump spoke on the phone with Mr. Pence and Republican lawmakers on the morning of Jan. 6 as he pushed to overturn the election. For instance, Mr. Trump mistakenly called the phone of Senator Mike Lee, Republican of Utah, thinking it was the number of Senator Tommy Tuberville, Republican of Alabama. Mr. Lee then passed the phone to Mr. Tuberville, who said he spoke to the former president for less than 10 minutes as rioters were breaking into the building.

But many of the calls the committee is aware of did not show up in the official logs.

The revelations about incomplete call logs come as Mr. Trump is under increasing scrutiny for apparently violating the Presidential Records Act by ripping up some White House documents and taking others with him when he left office. The House Oversight committee on Thursday announced an investigation into what it called “potential serious violations” of the law, including that Mr. Trump took 15 boxes of White House documents to his Palm Beach, Fla., compound and attempted to destroy presidential records.

Mr. Trump’s conduct, said Representative Carolyn Maloney, Democrat of New York and chairwoman of the oversight committee, “involves a former president potentially violating a criminal law by intentionally removing records, including communications with a foreign leader, from the White House and reportedly attempting to destroy records by tearing them up.”

The National Archives and Records Administration discovered what it believed was classified information in documents Mr. Trump had taken with him. The Washington Post reported on Wednesday that the National Archives had asked the Justice Department to examine Mr. Trump’s handling of White House records.

Read original article here

Debris From Disintegrating Planet Seen Hurtling Into White Dwarf Star for First Time

Artist’s impression of a white dwarf, G29—38, accreting planetary material from a circumstellar debris disk. When the planetary material hits the white dwarf surface, a plasma is formed and cools via detectable X-ray emission. Credit: University of Warwick/Mark Garlick

Final Moments of Planetary Remnants Seen for First Time

  • New study confirms decades of indirect evidence for debris from disintegrating planets hurtling into white dwarfs across the galaxy
  • (function(d, s, id){ var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.6"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

    Read original article here

White House approves Pentagon plan for US troops to help Americans leave Ukraine if Russia invades

The US forces are not currently authorized to enter Ukraine itself if a war breaks out, and there are no plans for them to conduct a noncombatant evacuation operation akin to the US operation in Afghanistan last summer, the officials emphasized.

Instead, the plan as it now stands is that the troops, who are from the 82nd Airborne Division, will begin setting up processing areas and temporary shelters inside Poland near Ukraine’s border where Americans fleeing Ukraine could go for help while in transit. The facilities have not yet been stood up, one defense official said, but will start to be as more US troops arrive in Poland.

The Wall Street Journal first reported that the White House had approved the Pentagon’s plan.

Pentagon Press Secretary John Kirby told reporters earlier this month that 82nd Airborne troops were sent to Poland primarily because “they are multi-mission capable.”

“They can do a lot of things,” Kirby said, when asked whether they would help with any potential evacuation. “It’s a very versatile force. And I think their versatility, their ability to — to move quickly and to conduct a range of missions across a range of contingencies, which is well proven, that’s the reason why the secretary has ordered them to go.”

Asked about the planning, a White House official told CNN that “these are multi-mission forces, trained and equipped for a variety of missions to deter aggression and to provide reassurance to NATO Allies. We are constantly evaluating the evolving security situation and planning for a range of contingencies as we always do, but to be clear we are not planning for a mass evacuation of American citizens from Ukraine. President Biden has been clear that we believe Americans in Ukraine would be wise to leave Ukraine.”

The White House official also pointed to White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki’s comments late last month when asked under what circumstances the US would evacuate American citizens and diplomats from Ukraine, and whether it could be done without the US military.

“There is not an intention for there to be a departure or an evacuation” using the military, Psaki said. “So we are conveying to American citizens they should leave now. There is not precedent, beyond Afghanistan, for that to be how it operates.”

The State Department announced late last month that it would reduce staff levels at the US Embassy in Kyiv, Ukraine, beginning with the departure of nonessential staff and family members. It also issued the highest-level travel advisory for Ukraine, telling Americans not to travel to the country and to be aware of reports that Russia is planning for significant military action.

State Department officials have repeatedly urged Americans to leave the country now, warning that US government assistance would be “severely impacted” if there is Russian military action in the country.

Russia’s military buildup is continuing. In the last 24 hours, Moscow has added approximately 2,000 combat forces to the border areas near Ukraine, according to an administration official. The current assessment is that more will be added in the coming days based on current intelligence.

The US has estimated that Russia has more than 100,000 troops near the Ukraine border. Comprised of approximately 100 battalion tactical groups (BTGs) with more on the way. A Russian BTG is a formation that can include between 800 to 1,000 troops. But US officials have long said it is not clear how fully the Russians are manning all these units.

There is currently no sign of any Russian military pullback, the official said.

CNN’s Oren Liebermann contributed reporting.

Read original article here

The Ultimate News Site