Tag Archives: White

White House says COVID-19 money on ’empty’ as it ties approval to Ukraine aid

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The White House is warning that the U.S. will soon begin to run out of money for COVID-19 supplies unless Congress acts to approve more funding. 

Officials say more money is needed for antibody treatments, preventative pills and to fund testing sites. 

BIDEN ADMIN SENDS MIXED MESSAGES ON ALLEGED RUSSIAN WAR CRIMES

“From the COVID side, the bank account is empty,” COVID-19 deputy coordinator Natalie Quillian said. “We’re in conversations with lawmakers about how to secure the funding, but it’s urgently needed.” Some of the consequences could be felt later this month.

“This is an urgent request and this is what is at stake in our fight against COVID,” White House press secretary Jen Psaki told reporters on Friday.

A request sent to Congress from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) seeks $22.5 billion in immediate COVID-19 response needs with an ask for $10 billion to provide support to Ukraine following Russia’s invasion. 

“I urge the Congress to address these critical and urgent needs as part of a comprehensive government funding bill ahead of the March 11th funding deadline,” OMB acting Director Shalanda Young said in the Wednesday letter, noting that “additional needs may arise over time” due to the “rapidly evolving situation in Ukraine.” 

White House press secretary Jen Psaki speaks during a press briefing at the White House, Friday, March 4, 2022. 
(AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

The Biden administration has warned that COVID-19 testing manufacturers will start to slow production of at-home rapid tests this month – unless the federal government signs contracts to purchase more.

The Health Resources and Services Administration will be forced to begin winding down claims for COVID-19 treatment for uninsured people this month in Congress doesn’t provide more money. The U.S. government supply of monoclonal antibodies would run out in May. 

“These resources are needed promptly to immediately secure supply of highly effective oral antiviral treatments; to purchase monoclonal antibodies and pre-exposure prophylaxis; to continue operating critical testing initiatives and funding testing, treatments and vaccines for the uninsured; to initiate work on a next-generation vaccine that protects against future variants; to accelerate global vaccination efforts and provide urgent humanitarian relief abroad; and for other purposes,” Young said. 

Should regulators make the Pfizer vaccine for children under age 5 a three-dose regimen, or if they determine kids aged 5-11 should get boosted, the administration would need more money.

CONGRESS CAN TALK A LOT ABOUT UKRAINE, BUT ITS POWER TO ACT IS LIMITED

However, lawmakers have struggled to reach a spending agreement for the current fiscal year and Republicans have expressed concerns over how much money would be spent towards pandemic relief. 

“Oh no, that’s too much,” Alabama Sen. Richard Shelby said Thursday when asked about the administration’s $22.5 billion request. “And secondly, we want to see how much money is out there” that hasn’t been spent yet from previously approved COVID-19 funding.

Utah Sen. Mitt Romney and 35 other GOP senators wrote to President Biden on Tuesday saying they want a “full accounting” of how the government has spent funds already provided before supporting new money. 

The president signed the sweeping $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan into law last March without any support from Republicans. 

Now, the White House says it is open to exploring reallocating already-approved, unspent money – and potentially shifting the cost of shots and pills to insurers. But, it emphasized that the priority must be to continue to meet needs. 

“We are being reasonable in our urgent request now, but we know more will be needed,” said Quillian.

Since the pandemic’s start. COVID-19 relief bills have contained $370 billion for public health programs, according to a Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) table obtained by The Associated Press, $355 billion of which is currently being spent, has been spent or has been committed to contracts. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“The $22 billion for COVID is absolutely necessary; in fact, we probably will need more as we need more therapies,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said at her weekly news conference.

Pelosi said she hopes Republicans will “see the wisdom of the science of what we need to do in terms of COVID,” according to The New York Times.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Read original article here

White House expected to send Vice President Harris to Poland, source says

Russian President Vladimir Putin holds a meeting with members of his security council on March 3. (Kremlin Press Office/Handout/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images)

There is a loud and growing chorus of calls for the International Criminal Court to pursue Vladimir Putin. On Wednesday, the court said it would immediately proceed with an active investigation of possible war crimes following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

The US Embassy in Kyiv said on Friday that Russia committed a war crime by attacking a nuclear power plant in Ukraine.

“It is a war crime to attack a nuclear power plant,” the embassy said on its official Twitter feed. “Putin’s shelling of Europe’s largest nuclear plant takes his reign of terror one step further.”

Russia’s suspected use of cluster bombs and so-called vacuum bombs in dense areas with many civilians has also been described as a war crime.

“I want to be very clear about this, that Mr. Putin is a war criminal,” former Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk told the Council on Foreign Relations on Thursday. “He has to sit behind the bars in International Criminal Court.”

However, if justice in general moves slowly, international justice barely moves at all. Investigations at the ICC take many years. Only a handful of convictions have ever been won.

Here’s a very broad look at war crimes and the international justice movement:

Note: Some of what’s below comes from CNN’s research library, which compiled information about the International Criminal Court.

What is a war crime? The International Criminal Court has specific definitions for genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and the crime of aggression. Read about them in this guide published by the ICC.

Specifically, targeting civilian populations, violating the Geneva Conventions, targeting specific groups of people and more could be potential Russian war crimes.

“One thing is certain, that intentionally directing shelling or targeting civilians or civilian objects is a crime within the jurisdiction of the court,” the ICC’s chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour on Thursday.

“And even if there’s military necessity, there’s a clear obligation upon parties to a conflict to not use disproportionate force, to make sure the ordnance used and the weapons don’t have a very wide footprint in heavy civilian areas,” said Khan.

What are cluster bombs and vacuum bombs? The feared use of banned weapons meant to kill without discrimination is what people are discussing now as a very specific war crime.

With a cluster bomb, a missile is fired and explodes thousands of feet in the air, releasing smaller bombs that each detonate when they fall to the ground. See an illustration from The Washington Post. Amnesty International said a Russian cluster bomb fell on a Ukrainian preschool.

“Vacuum bombs,” or thermobaric weapons, suck in the oxygen from the surrounding air to generate a powerful explosion and a large pressure wave that can have enormous destructive effects. Russia previously used them in Chechnya, and a CNN team spotted a Russian thermobaric multiple rockets launcher near the border with Ukraine late last month.

Read the full analysis here.



Read original article here

Ukraine, coronavirus aid are part of big White House funding request to Congress

To aid Ukraine, the Biden administration called on lawmakers to approve $10 billion, hoping to address the emerging humanitarian crisis in the country in the face of a worsening Russian onslaught. The proposal also included assistance to bolster Ukraine’s defenses, protect its electrical grid from disruption, and further equip other European allies, according to two people familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the plans.

For the pandemic, meanwhile, the Biden administration requested about $22.5 billion from Congress to replenish key public health programs as a safeguard against future variants of the coronavirus, the people said. Top White House officials have maintained in recent days that they have enough funding to combat the waning omicron surge. But they have stressed that significant money has been spent or committed to specific purposes, warranting new investment in testing, therapeutics and vaccines to protect against the possibility of a new wave.

The fate of the two spending requests rests in the hands of Congress, where lawmakers have raced in recent days to cobble together a widely sought — and repeatedly delayed — long-term deal to fund the government. Talks have progressed, but disagreements remain, including over the size and scope of the emergency aid that might be attached to the deal, known in congressional parlance as an omnibus.

On Tuesday, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) announced a “snag” in talks over Ukraine assistance, attacking Democrats for trying to source the money from sums they already planned to apportion for the Pentagon. A day later, dozens of Republicans questioned whether additional coronavirus aid is necessary, arguing that the Biden administration has not fully accounted for existing spending, including the $1.9 trillion package adopted last year.

The Biden administration sought to assuage those concerns in the request it is transmitting to Congress. The Ukraine money would be new, emergency aid, not repurposed dollars meant for the Defense Department. And the funds set aside for the coronavirus reflect immediate needs, particularly because some existing programs to help uninsured Americans obtain tests and vaccinations are set to expire this spring, according to one of the people familiar with the administration’s thinking.

But it remained unclear whether it would be enough to satisfy Republicans, particularly those who still question whether more pandemic-related spending is necessary at a time when infections are waning. In both cases, though, senior administration officials said the fast-evolving nature of both crises could force them to seek additional funds in the weeks ahead.

“Given the rapidly evolving situation in Ukraine, I anticipate that additional needs may arise over time,” Shalanda Young, acting director of the Office of Management and Budget, wrote in a letter to lawmakers obtained by The Washington Post. She added she anticipates that “additional funding will be needed to support the covid-19 response,” as well.

For now, the clock is ticking: Lawmakers have eight days to finalize the emergency spending measures and broker a broader government funding deal, though they can still buy themselves additional time with another stopgap. Top Democrats and Republicans have insisted they have made progress in recent weeks, with Sen. Richard C. Shelby of Alabama, the top Republican on his chamber’s appropriations panel, telling reporters Wednesday that negotiators “haven’t sealed anything, but we’re moving positively.”

Without such a deal, Young, the acting OMB director, warned of significant consequences. In her missive, dated Wednesday, she said a failure to act could “constrain” the Pentagon and its readiness while preventing a wide array of agencies from carrying out efforts to combat the coronavirus, including a new administration initiative to bolster the delivery of tests and antiviral drugs.

Initially, the Biden administration had asked lawmakers to provide about $6.4 billion in response to Ukraine, hoping to boost programs at the State Department and Pentagon in response to the geopolitical crisis. The money was meant to shore up the country at a time when the president had joined with the international community in levying historic sanctions against Russia and key Kremlin-aligned figures. At the time, top officials warned that their ask could change as conditions on the ground warranted.

Soon, though, Democrats and Republicans alike quickly called for additional spending, and the Biden administration found reason for it. The roughly $10 billion request transmitted to Congress would help train Ukraine’s military, boost its cybersecurity defenses, provide food and other humanitarian aid and fortify its electricity supply.

It also called for funding to enforce the president’s recent actions to punish Russia. That includes $59 million for a task force, announced during the president’s State of the Union address on Tuesday, that aims to enforce sanctions against Russian oligarchs who have avoided them. And it proposed $91 million for the Treasury Department, an allotment that would support the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN, which can pursue offshore companies and trusts often hidden from government view.

The Biden administration’s request for aid to combat the coronavirus comes about a month after top officials told lawmakers they had exhausted nearly all the money set aside for the Department of Health and Human Services to respond to the pandemic.

Initially, HHS asked Congress for more than $30 billion to bolster public health programs, with a focus on stocking the country with more therapeutics and monoclonal antibodies and researching new vaccines. The Biden administration sought an additional $5 billion to aid the deployment of vaccines globally, hoping to help prevent more dangerous versions of the virus from originating in unprotected populations.

Ultimately, though, the administration settled on a formal request for $22.5 billion — with about $18.25 billion set aside for public health and $4.25 billion for global vaccine deployment. The latter figure amounts to less than some congressional Democrats initially sought, though party lawmakers have labored in recent days to try to increase the sum.

Even before the Biden administration transmitted the request, it had encountered early political obstacles, as spending-wary Republicans questioned whether the money is needed. Nearly a year after the party opposed Biden’s $1.9 trillion aid package, some including McConnell have urged the administration to repurpose existing aid rather than seek new funds. This week, three dozen GOP members also criticized the White House, saying it had failed to be transparent about how much has been spent and how much remains of the roughly $6 trillion in emergency funds approved since the start of the pandemic.

“We want to know where the money has gone,” said Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah), who led a letter to the Biden administration signaling the GOP may not support additional aid. The missive raised the possibility that Republicans could withhold their votes unless they first receive more information about the administration’s existing spending.

Taking to the Senate floor a day later, Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) responded to the concerns with a warning. “Either we act now to secure the progress we made, or we risk backsliding,” he said.

Read original article here

White House says sanctioning Russian fuel exports ‘on the table,’ but Biden still weighing their impact on gas prices at home

Taking such a step would be an extraordinary measure that could have an intense effect on domestic gas prices, however, and Psaki made clear that the White House’s top priority is to minimize the impact at home.

“What (Biden) does not want to do is topple the global oil markets or the global marketplace or impact the American people more with higher energy and gas prices,” Psaki told CNN’s John Berman on “New Day.”

“That’s something we heavily weigh. It’s still on the table. It’s not off the table. But again, that’s how the President looks at this as we’re announcing and pursuing additional steps,” she added.

The US has already announced a slew of sanctions against Russia and President Vladimir Putin since the country’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine last week. But the unprecedented step of sanctioning its oil experts would likely send prices skyrocketing, dealing a painful blow to consumers around the world as Russia is the world’s No. 2 oil producer.

Though the US consumes very little Russian oil — oil imports from Russia stood at just 90,000 barrels per day in December — the interconnected global market means supply shocks in one part of the world can impact prices everywhere.

Psaki’s comments come as the US and other countries scramble to steady gas prices at home as the crisis enters its second week. On Tuesday, the White House and International Energy Agency announced that the US and its allies agreed to a release of 60 million barrels of oil from their reserves, a move the IEA said was meant to send a “strong message to global oil markets that there will be no shortfall” as a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Prices surged even higher Wednesday, as global crude oil prices rose to more than $110 per barrel and the cost of natural gas skyrocketed to a new record in Europe as Russia’s escalating military campaign in Ukraine stoked fear in markets.

Despite soaring prices, Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries members and Russia agreed to stick to their current plan of gradually increasing output by just 400,000 barrels per day per month.

The cartel said in a statement “that current oil market fundamentals and the consensus on its outlook pointed to a well-balanced market, and that current volatility is not caused by changes in market fundamentals but by current geopolitical developments,” adding that its next meeting will be March 31.

Echoing Psaki, Vice President Kamala Harris said Wednesday that “everything is on the table” as the US assesses economic sanctions on Russia and continued to stress the US will not send troops to fight Russian forces in Ukraine.

“What we are going to continue to do is stand firm with our allies in terms of reassessing what we are doing with sanctions. Everything is on the table for consideration, frankly,” she told NBC News.

This story has been updated with additional developments Tuesday morning.

CNN’s Kate Sullivan and Matt Egan contributed to this report.

Read original article here

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene defends speaking at conference organized by white nationalist

Romney on Sunday called racist views “evil.”

“There’s no place in either political party for this white nationalism or racism. It’s simply wrong,” Romney told Bash. He added: “Marjorie Taylor Greene and Paul Gosar — I don’t know them, but I’m reminded of that old line from the ‘Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid’ movie where one character says, ‘Morons. I’ve got morons on my team.’ ”

“And I have to think anybody that would sit down with white nationalists and speak at their conference was certainly missing a few IQ points,” Romney added.

Greene attended the conference in person, according to CBS News, while Gosar addressed attendees in a 30-second prerecorded video. Gosar attended the event last year, The Washington Post reported.

Before introducing Greene, Fuentes told the crowd, “Now they’re going on about Russia and Vladimir Putin is Hitler — they say that’s not a good thing.” Fuentes also asked the crowd to “give a round of applause for Russia” and responded, “Absolutely,” as attendees chanted “Putin! Putin!”

After Fuentes introduced Greene, she told the crowd they were “canceled Americans,” HuffPost reported.

“You’ve been handed the responsibility to fight for our Constitution and stand for our freedoms, and stop the Democrats, who are the Communist Party of the United States of America,” Greene said.

Romney wasn’t the only conservative to criticize Greene for her Friday speech, given hours before she addressed the Conservative Political Action Conference, which was also held last week in Orlando. Ronna McDaniel, chairwoman of the Republican National Committee and Romney’s niece, said, “White supremacy, neo-Nazism, hate speech and bigotry are disgusting and do not have a home in the Republican Party,” comments Romney cited on “State of the Union.”

Romney also denounced former president Donald Trump and other Republicans for complimenting Putin in what the senator called “almost treasonous” comments.

On Sunday, Greene defended herself to CBS News, denouncing the attacks against her as “identity politics” and an attempt to “cancel” her. She also said she didn’t know about Fuentes’s views and spoke at the conference not because she agreed with the organizers but to engage with an audience about what she believes.

“It doesn’t matter if I’m speaking to Democrat union members or 1,200 young conservatives who feel cast aside and marginalized by society,” Greene said in a statement to CBS News. “The Pharisees in the Republican Party may attack me for being willing to break barriers and speak to a lost generation of young people who are desperate for love and leadership.”

Greene has a history of making inflammatory comments. In 2018, she blamed California’s wildfires on a “laser” beamed from space in a Facebook post that surfaced last year, Forbes reported. Last year, she equated safety measures designed to stop the spread of the coronavirus with the Holocaust, The Post reported. Before she was elected in 2020, she claimed the school shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla., was a hoax, according to NPR.

Romney slammed her for those comments, too, telling reporters in February 2021 that the Republican Party “should have nothing to do with Marjorie Taylor Greene,” NPR reported.

“It’s important for us to separate ourselves from the people that are in the wacky weeds,” he said, “and if we don’t, then our opposition tries to brand us with their image and with their point of view.”



Read original article here

Liz Cheney calls out Republicans for being associated with White nationalist event

“As Rep Marjorie Taylor Greene and Rep Paul Gosar speak at this white supremacist, anti-Semitic, pro-Putin event, silence by Republican Party leaders is deafening and enabling,” Cheney tweeted Saturday.

“All Americans should renounce this garbage and reject the Putin wing of the GOP now,” she added.

Greene, a Georgia Republican, spoke at the America First Political Action Conference in Orlando, Florida, on Friday — an event founded by the far-right activist Fuentes as an alternative to the annual Conservative Political Action Conference, which is taking place this week.

Gosar appeared at the American First Political Action Conference via a pre-recorded video, HuffPost reported. The Arizona Republican attended the same conference last year, and Cheney was the only member of House GOP leadership to directly call him out over it at the time.
Illinois Rep. Adam Kinzinger, who, like Cheney, has been increasingly marginalized within the GOP after criticizing former President Donald Trump’s hold on the party, also made his criticism known, tweeting Saturday at Greene, “If this was not bizarro world, you would be the one censured and excommunicated from the GOP.”
Utah Sen. Mitt Romney backed up Cheney’s remarks in an interview Sunday with CNN’s Dana Bash on “State of the Union.”

“Liz Cheney was right with that statement and has been right for a long time,” the Republican senator said. “There’s no place in either political party for this White nationalism or racism. It’s simply wrong.”

Fuentes, who has been labeled a White supremacist by the US Justice Department and the Anti-Defamation League, has been banned from most major social media platforms for his White nationalist rhetoric.

After Russian forces invaded Ukraine this week, Fuentes wrote on the messaging app Telegram, “I am totally rooting for Russia,” while also referring to Russian President Vladimir Putin as “my Czar.”

And the Republican Jewish Coalition took aim at Greene and Gosar for associating with Fuentes.

“It is appalling and outrageous that a Member of Congress would share a platform with an individual who has actively spread antisemitic bile, mocked the Holocaust, and promoted dangerous anti-Israel conspiracy theories,” the coalition said in a statement.

Greene, meanwhile, defended her appearance at the event.

“I am not going to play the guilt by association game in which you demand every conservative should justify anything ever said by anyone they’ve ever shared a room with. I’m not going to be drawn into that. I’m only responsible for what I say,” she said in a statement Saturday.

“I’m also not going to turn down the opportunity to speak to 1,200 young America First patriots because of a few off-color remarks by another speaker, even if I find those remarks unsavory,” she added.

She told reporters at CPAC on Saturday that she doesn’t know Fuentes, or about his views, and condemned Putin and his invasion of Ukraine.

Gosar and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Greene and Gosar have a history of pushing conspiracy theories and espousing inflammatory rhetoric. House Democrats voted to strip both lawmakers from their committee assignments last year. Gosar was also formally censured by the House in November over posting a violent anime video that depicted him killing a Democratic House member.
Last year, Gosar denied knowing about a fundraiser Fuentes planned to host for him.
Fuentes was also present on US Capitol grounds on January 6, 2021, and was subpoenaed by the House panel investigating the attack. He has promoted unsupported theories about fraud in the 2020 election.

CORRECTION: This story has been updated to correct the titles of the America First Political Action Conference and the Conservative Political Action Conference.

CNN’s Daniella Diaz contributed to this report.



Read original article here

Russian central bank targeted by White House and allies

“Putin embarked on a path aiming to destroy Ukraine. But what he is also doing in fact is destroying the future of his own country,” European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said Saturday. In response, she said, “we will paralyze the assets of Russia’s central bank. This will freeze its transactions. It will make it impossible for the central bank to liquidate assets.”

In a joint statement by the European Union, the United States, Britain and Canada, the countries announced they reached an agreement on what appear to be unprecedented measures to “ensure that this war is a strategic failure for Putin.”

“As Russian forces unleash their assault on Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities, we are resolved to continue imposing costs on Russia that will further isolate Russia from the international financial system and our economies,” the statement said. “We will implement these measures within the coming days.”

But the White House didn’t immediately release details on how the moves against the central bank would be implemented. Steps short of freezing Russia’s reserves held in all the major Western economies could have a lesser impact on its central bank, which is Russia’s equivalent of the Federal Reserve.

Russia’s central bank had over $640 billion in foreign exchange reserves as of Feb. 18, much of it held in the computers of Western central banks in cities such as New York, London and Frankfurt. The effort to freeze or quarantine that money will likely put tremendous pressure on Russia, one of the world’s largest economies and a nuclear power. It could lead to domestic turmoil, triggering a bank run, cratering the ruble and causing businesses to panic.

“We’re disarming ‘Fortress Russia’ by taking this action,” said a senior administration official, speaking on the condition of anonymity under rules set by the White House.

In its statement, the allies said, “We commit to imposing restrictive measures that will prevent the Russian Central Bank from deploying its international reserves in ways that undermine the impact of our sanctions.”

Those measures will come on top of sanctions that the United States and Europe began imposing this week in response to Russia’s invasion. On Tuesday, Biden announced sanctions against two Russian state-owned banks. On Thursday, the West upped the ante, penalizing more Russian banks and targeting the 10 largest Russian financial institutions, holding nearly 80 percent of total bank assets.

“This has been the worst week for the Russian stock market on record,” the senior administration official said. The Russian ruble has had its worst week since March 2020, its currency hit a record low against the dollar this week, and Russian borrowing costs have almost doubled to 17 percent, the official said. “In short,” the official said, “Russia has become a global economic financial pariah.”

The targeting of Russia’s central bank would be the most significant penalty yet. The United States and other governments are still working out the exact measures, the official said, explaining that they could involve blocking “flows that the Russian central bank is allowed to undertake” as well as freezing its assets.

Already, the sanctions imposed have induced Moscow to dip into its foreign reserves. Russia’s central bank announced it had decided to “start interventions in the foreign exchange market” to stabilize its financial market and provide banks with “extra liquidity.” It has not reported how much of its foreign currency it has sold to do so.

Michael Bernstam, a research fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, said a full and immediate sanction of the central bank is the only financial punishment that could possibly get Moscow to stand down from its aggression.

Cracking down on the central bank could prompt Russian citizens and businesses to “rush to get dollars,” Bernstam said. “There will be a huge panic, a run on the dollar. The exchange rate will collapse.”

Richard Nephew, a senior research scholar at Columbia University, said if done in a coordinated fashion, “you would impose dramatic sweeping costs on the Russian state. This would in one fell swoop say all the reserves of Russia are locked down and no longer usable,” adding that “it could have a devastating effect on the Russian economy.”

But the strategy is not without its risks. The United States has never taken this step against any country with nuclear weapons or an economy as large as Russia. And it is possible the Kremlin reacts by ratcheting up hostilities against Ukraine or by using it to reinforce Putin’s claim at home that the West is out to destroy Russia. Sanctioning the central bank, Nephew said, “will be seen as a massive escalation regardless.”

Mark Weisbrot, a liberal economist and a director at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, warned that targeting Russia’s central bank could prove to be a mistake. “If there’s one thing that recent events have shown, it’s that threats to meet or deter military force with economic punishment are not working,” he said. “And if carried out, these threats have additional costs for all parties.”

Russians have an acute memory of the country’s financial crisis in 1998. Many people saw their savings go up in smoke as Moscow devalued the ruble and defaulted on its debt. In 2014, when Putin’s first invasion of Ukraine coincided with a decline in oil prices, the ruble also plummeted, prompting Russians to line up at banks to withdraw money and make huge purchases of appliances, cars and other items before prices surged.

As of June 30 last year, 32 percent of Russia’s foreign currency reserves were euros and 16 percent were U.S. dollars, according to its central bank. About 7 percent were British pounds, 13 percent Chinese renminbi and 22 percent monetary gold. The remainder was held in other currencies.

So China is not a likely safety net here for Russia, analysts said. The senior administration official also pointed to media reports this week that China had restricted financing for Russian commodity purchases, suggesting Beijing had limits to its willingness to support Moscow in the crisis.

SWIFT is short for the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, a global messaging network that connects banks around the world. The consortium, based in Belgium, links banks in 200 countries and is used as money is transferred through the banking system. Last year, SWIFT averaged 42 million messages a day.

President Biden was asked by reporters several days ago why the White House hadn’t decided to restrict Russia’s access to SWIFT. He said the idea was under consideration but that some European countries had not yet agreed to take that step.

Europe’s calculation appeared to have changed in the past few days as Russia’s attacks in Ukraine continued. While under siege in Kyiv, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky appealed to the West to cut Russia off from SWIFT, and in particular urged Germany and Hungary to do so, suggesting they were the final European holdouts.

In their joint statement, the United States and its allies said “we commit to ensuring that selected Russian banks are removed from the SWIFT messaging system. This will ensure that these banks are disconnected from the international financial system and harm their ability to operate globally.”

The statement did not specify which “selected Russian banks” would be removed, and the statement suggested that some Russian banks could be exempt from the action. It included three other commitments. The countries said they would take action against people and entities responsible for the war in Ukraine “and the harmful activities of the Russian government.”

They also said they would “limit the sale of citizenship” through “golden passports” that let “wealthy Russians connected to the Russian government become citizens of our countries and gain access to our financial systems.”

In addition, they said they were creating a task force that is meant to ensure that sanctions against oligarchs and others are implemented effectively.

Read original article here

White House spokesperson compares Trump, Putin to pigs “rubbing their snouts together.”

Deputy White House press secretary Andrew Bates called former president Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin “nauseating, fearful pigs what America stands for”.

Mr Bates’ broadside in a tweet posted on Thursday, came as he shared a HuffPost article that featured quotes from a speech Mr Trump gave on Tuesday night, at Mar-a-Lago praising the Russian leader as “pretty smart” for “taking over a country for $2 worth of sanctions.”

“He’s taking over a country, really a vast, vast location, a great piece of land with a lot of people, just walking right in,” Mr Trump said.

The former president’s comments came as Russia began a full-scale military assault on Ukraine that has already left scores of people dead and countless more fearing for their safety in what is already one of the biggest military conflicts in Europe since the end of the second World War.

Reports this afternoon suggest that Russian forces are preparing to try to capture the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv and have already today captured the nearby Chernobyl area after heavy fighting.

Mr Trump has a history of praising authoritarian leaders, including Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines, and Kim Jong Un of North Korea, but he has long seemed particularly fond of Mr Putin — whose government’s meddling in the 2016 presidential election was intended to boost Mr Trump’s electoral chances.

This most recent praise, of a military action roundly condemned by the United States and its western allies, rankled Mr Bates.

The Biden administration Thursday morning announced a package of new sanctions intended to punish Russia for the attack on its neighboring state, while making clear that he did not intend to involve American troops in the conflict.

“Putin chose this war, and now he and his country will bear the consequences,” Mr Biden said.



Read original article here

White House spokesman calls Trump and Putin ‘two nauseating, fearful pigs who hate what America stands for’

A top White House spokesman on Thursday called former President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin “two nauseating, fearful pigs who hate what America stands for” after Trump again praised Putin’s invasion of Ukraine.

Speaking at a political fundraiser at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Fla., on Wednesday night, Trump reiterated his view that the Russian president’s incursion into the sovereign nation was a stroke of “genius.”

“I mean, he’s taking over a country for $2 worth of sanctions,” Trump said. “I’d say that’s pretty smart. He’s taking over a country — literally a vast, vast location, a great piece of land with a lot of people, and just walking right in.” The former president went on to insist that he knew Putin very well and that the crisis would not have happened if he were in office.

Russian President Vladimir Putin and President Donald Trump at the G-20 summit in 2017. (Getty Images)

Andrew Bates, the White House deputy press secretary, responded with a scathing tweet.

“Two nauseating, fearful pigs who hate what America stands for and whose every action is driven by their their own weakness and insecurity, rubbing their snouts together and celebrating as innocent people lose their lives,” Bates tweeted.

Trump’s comments came shortly before Putin launched a predawn attack on Ukraine, hitting cities with airstrikes and sending tanks across the border. The long-anticipated move, which U.S. intelligence agencies have been predicting for months, was widely condemned by world leaders.

President Biden called it “an unprovoked and unjustified attack by Russian military forces.”

The Ukrainian State Border Guard Service site, damaged by shelling in Kyiv on Thursday. (Handout via Reuters)

“Putin has chosen a premeditated war that will bring a catastrophic loss of life and human suffering,” Biden said in a statement. “Russia alone is responsible for the death and destruction this attack will bring, and the United States and its Allies and partners will respond in a united and decisive way. The world will hold Russia accountable.”

On Tuesday, Trump made headlines by praising Putin’s decision to send troops into Ukraine to support Russian-backed separatists in Luhansk and Donetsk provinces.

“This is genius,” he said on a radio program. “So Putin is now saying it’s independent — a large section of Ukraine. I said, how smart is that? And he’s gonna go in and be a peacekeeper. We could use that on our southern border. That’s the strongest peace force I’ve ever seen. There were more army tanks than I’ve ever seen. They’re gonna keep peace, all right.”



Read original article here

‘White Lotus’ Star To Play Chamelon In Sony’s ‘Kraven The Hunter’ – Deadline

EXCLUSIVE: Fred Hechinger has joined Sony Pictures’ Kraven the Hunter, starring Aaron Taylor Johnson in the titular role. Although it’s unconfirmed, sources say Hechinger would play Chameleon, the brother of Kraven, in the movie.

J.C. Chandor is directing the pic with Avi Arad and Matt Tolmach producing. Art Marcum & Matt Holloway and Richard Wenk penned the screenplay.

One of Sony Pictures’ universe of Marvel characters, Kraven is among Marvel’s most iconic and notorious antiheroes, who has encountered Venom and Black Panther among many others as well as being one of Spider-Man’s best-known and most-formidable enemies. The film will be released theatrically on January 13, 2023.

As for Chameleon, the character is the half-brother of Kraven and usually is depicted as a master of disguises, known for his ability to impersonate virtually anybody

Sony is coming off a hot streak with Venom: Let There Be Carnage making more than $500 million worldwide, while Spider-Man: No Way Home has become the biggest film of 2021 with $1.7 billion in worldwide sales. As for future films, the Jared Leto starrer Morbius bows in April, and the studio just named Dakota Johnson to lead Madame Web.

Hechinger is coming off his scene-stealing role as Steve Zahn and Connie Britton’s son in HBO’s hit series The White Lotus. He appears in the Hulu limited series Pam & Tommy and is filming Scott Cooper’s The Pale Blue Eye starring Christian Bale. He also will be seen in Gabe Polsky’s upcoming Butchers Crossing, starring Nicolas Cage and adapted from John Williams’ 1960 novel.

Hechinger is repped by A3 Artists Agency, Brillstein, and attorney Ryan LeVine.



Read original article here