Tag Archives: Francisco

San Francisco 49ers list of 2021 NFL draft picks

The NFL on Wednesday announced compensatory draft picks, which finalized the 49ers’ available selections for this year’s draft.

While there was a bit of confusion about how many comp picks the 49ers received, they wound up with the expected two, giving them 10 heading into the start of the new league year.

That’s a far cry from the limited capital San Francisco was equipped with last year when they wound up with only five players in the seven-round draft. The 10 selections will give them the opportunity to either add a slew of cost-controlled players to help rebuild their roster, or give them a chance to move up and down the board on Draft Day.

Here is the 49ers’ updated list of picks:

Round 1, Pick 12
Round 2, Pick 43
Round 3, Pick 102 (compensatory)
Round 4, Pick 117
Round 5, Pick 155
Round 5, Pick 172 (via New Orleans)
Round 5, Pick 180 (Compensatory)
Round 6, Pick 193
Round 7, Pick 229 (via New York Jets)
Round 7, Pick 239

One thing that stands out aside from the number of picks is where those picks are. The 49ers hold four picks in the top 150, but only two in the top 100 after trading their third-round selection to Washington last year in exchange for Trent Williams.

With a loaded back end of the draft, don’t be surprised if San Francisco uses some of those selections to climb up a couple times to add more premium talent. That’s assuming they wind up carrying all 10 choices into the draft. With plenty of rumblings about possible trades, the 49ers may wind up with a different looking war chest by the time the draft begins.

Read original article here

Trent Williams hints at return to San Francisco 49ers

Free agent left tackle Trent Williams is expected to test the market rather than re-signing with the 49ers before the NFL’s legal negotiating window opens March 15. That doesn’t mean he’s not aiming to return to San Francisco though, and he hinted strongly on the Cris Collinsworth Podcast featuring Richard Sherman that he was leaning toward staying in the Bay Area.

He didn’t outright announce his return, but his response when Sherman made a prediction for Williams’ impending free agency lent some hope that the left tackle would be back in San Francisco.

“I’ve got San Francisco,” Sherman said. “I’ve got him staying in San Francisco for the faithful. I think he stays in San Francisco. I think he makes you guys happy for another 5-6 years and gets his gold jacket, and then decides whether he wants it in Washington or San Francisco.”

Williams’ response after host George Chahrouri and Sherman both made their prediction for Williams to go back to the 49ers:

“That’s not a bad take, fellas. That’s not a bad take. Y’all are barking up the right tree.”

The 49ers acquired Williams from Washington last year for a fifth-round 2020 draft pick and a third-round pick in the 2021 draft. He seemed to indicate after the season he wanted to stay with the 49ers, but also said he’d explore the market to find out what he’s worth in what could be the 32-year-old’s last big pay day of his career.

It’d behoove Williams not to make any declarative statements one way or the other with free agent negotiations just around the corner, and a comment on a podcast is far from a binding commitment. The answer was good news for the 49ers for the time being though. They may just need to wait until after free agency unofficially begins on March 15 to get a real answer on Williams’ future.

Read original article here

Californians aren’t leaving the state en masse — but they are leaving San Francisco, study says

The number of Californians leaving the Bay Area has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly from San Francisco, according to a new study released Thursday.

Despite suggestions of a California exodus to other states in recent months, most who leave that region do not move far, though many Sierra counties saw a large influx of migrants from San Francisco compared with 2019.

The share of residents leaving the state has grown since 2015 — from 16% to 18% — a trend that continued in 2020 with “no marked increase,” the report from the nonpartisan California Policy Lab said.

“While a mass exodus from California clearly didn’t happen in 2020, the pandemic did change some historical patterns. For example, fewer people moved into the state to replace those who left,” Natalie Holmes, research fellow at the California Policy Lab, said in a statement. “At the county level, however, San Francisco is experiencing a unique and dramatic exodus, which is causing 50% or 100% increases in Bay Area in-migration for some counties in the Sierras.”

Since the beginning of the pandemic, net domestic exits from the Bay Area “have increased 178% compared to pre-pandemic trends, with a 9% increase in departures and a 21% decrease in entrances in the last three quarters of 2020 relative to the same period in 2019,” according to the study.

During the last three quarters of 2020, San Francisco saw the largest percentage increase in residential exits of any county in the state, data shows.

In the second through fourth quarters of 2020, exits from San Francisco “were 31% higher than during the same period in 2019.” New entrances were 21% lower, the study said. Net exits from San Francisco in the last nine months of 2020 increased nearly 650% compared with the same period in 2019 — from 5,200 net exits to 38,800.

“There is a trend in most urban areas, but it’s most pronounced in San Francisco,” said Evan White, executive director of the California Policy Lab at UC Berkeley.

Part of this flight from San Francisco, White said, may be the result of large tech companies shifting their offices to remote work for the foreseeable future. That kind of freedom may have led employees to move to more affordable counties, he said.

Most who left San Francisco stayed in the Bay Area economic region, according to the study, and some 80% remained in the state — a trend consistent with pre-pandemic patterns. Although Bay Area counties and urban centers in Southern California tend to be the most popular destinations for those leaving San Francisco, counties in the Sierra Nevada mountains saw some of the largest population growth from the Bay Area, especially in the final quarter of 2020.

“It will be interesting to see, when the pandemic comes to an end, whether those folks move back,” White said.

The number of people leaving California typically tracks with the amount entering the state. But the findings show that wasn’t the case in the fourth quarter of 2020, when 267,000 people left the state and only 128,000 entered.

“It doesn’t look like we’re going to see much change in migration for the state as a whole,” White said. “There’s not a huge migration of people and therefore of businesses, and that’s good news for the state, I suppose.”

But in San Francisco, he said, the implications have been “a little more interesting.”

“With people leaving, we’ve seen rents going down pretty dramatically,” he said. “If rents go down in the commercial and residential sector, we may see businesses trying to take advantage of that.”

window.fbAsyncInit = function() { FB.init({

appId : '134435029966155',

xfbml : true, version : 'v2.9' }); };

(function(d, s, id){ var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) {return;} js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Read original article here

Historic 1880s Victorian home moved in process that San Francisco hasn’t seen in 47 years

SAN FRANCISCO (KGO) — A relic of San Francisco’s past moved to a new location on Sunday and you can see it made for quite a sight.

A 141-year-old Victorian home was picked up and moved six blocks from Franklin Street to Fulton Street.

“This is phenomenal to see this humungous seven-bedroom house being moved,” said Wanda Ramos who lives near the home’s original location.

Gary Carter lives near the new location and echoed those same thoughts. “This is pretty big, pretty amazing,” said Carter.

Sebastian Luke was one of the many who watched the entire move simply saying, “It’s a beautiful building.”

And that beautiful historic building quickly took San Francisco and the internet by storm. Every angle being recorded by the hundreds of San Franciscans, many of whom compared it to the animated Pixar movie Up where a home was moved by balloons.

This home, known as the Englander House, was towed six blocks. Six blocks in around six hours.

“There’s been a few glitches on the way. Trees that were in the way, stops signs, lights, and signs and what not,” said Lana Costantini with the San Francisco Historical Society

“They hit a light pole right there at the corner of Golden Gate and Franklin and also they hit a couple trees,” said Eddie Ramos who closely watched the move.

But no worries because tree cutters were in place, streets were closed, and police were there to lead the way, even if things didn’t always look so perfect, and even as crews worked into the nighttime hours.

“I was scared when they were trying to turn on Golden Gate Street. I was surprised, I was like there’s no way but they got it through,” said Saron Eyob who lives nearby.

The historical society says this is the first time since 1974 that a Victorian home like this has been moved in San Francisco.

Giant dollies are carrying it at about one mile an hour and it came at a cost of $400,000 dollars. More than a dozen city agencies agreed to the relocation.

The Englander House will be turned into single family units. A former mortuary next door and the old lot will also be transformed into housing. Between 50 and 60 new units will eventually be available because of the move, along with of course, the historic home being restored and saved.

RELATED: Historic San Francisco Victorian home to be moved blocks away, converted into apartments

“I was up on the 11th floor at the time looking down and I just could not believe what was going down, I thought this is one for the history books,” said Eddie Ramos.

The move was no easy task. Power lines, parking meters and street lights were removed for the move. and Muni had to re-route some bus lines

The six-bedroom, three-bath home still has the original lumber and “anchor bolts” from the 19th century.

The mover says homes like these are worth preserving instead of demolishing.

Copyright © 2021 KGO-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Read original article here

NFL salary cap floor increase good for San Francisco 49ers

The NFL on Thursday sent a memo to teams that said the salary cap floor would be increased to $180 million for the 2021 season. While it’s a small bit of good news, it’s still good news for the 49ers and the impending salary cap gymnastics they’ll have to swing in free agency.

Prior to last season, the NFL and the NFL Players’ Association agreed to a salary cap floor of $175 million as they braced for the long-term financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Teams can typically rely on the cap to jump roughly $10 million every year. A $175 million floor would’ve been a $23 million dip from 2020 and left the 49ers with around $9 million in cap space.

Now the NFL has reset the floor at $180 million, which would leave San Francisco with $12,670,669 in available space. That number will jump up once they’ve made some cuts and roster restructures to free up some additional room.

General manager John Lynch told reporters after the season that the team was planning on a $175 million cap.

“We’re operating under the premise of the floor, which is 175 (million),” Lynch said in his end-of-season video conference. “We felt like that was best to operate off of that and kind of formulate our plans off of that. If it’s anything on top, that’s gravy for us.”

The additional $5 million will be advantageous in terms of working out their free agent situation, but it’s also a sign that the cap could come in a touch higher than $180 million.

Either way maneuvering won’t be easy for the 49ers this offseason. It’s the first time they’ve really been up against the cap with good players like Trent Williams, K’Waun Williams and Kyle Juszczyk all hitting free agency. They’ll need every last dollar they can get on the cap, and the NFL’s announcement of an increased cap floor gives them $5 million extra they didn’t plan on having.



Read original article here

Buster Posey back for possible final season with San Francisco Giants

Buster Posey tried to watch every inning of San Francisco Giants baseball that he could last year, but he was busy.

Most of his energy was spent caring for four children, particularly two adopted twin girls who were born eight weeks premature last summer. But he also found a useful way to keep his arm in shape — by balling diapers up really tight and flinging them at his 9-year-old son, Lee, while he ran for cover.

“You have to really make sure that you have the right weight of the diapers,” Posey said after the Giants’ first official workout on Wednesday. “Depending on how well they’ve been feeding, that plays a lot into my accuracy and if it’s equivalent to the weight of a baseball. Take all that into account, whatever type of formula they’ve got, if they’re eating baby food or not — and yeah, I’ve been pretty accurate.”

Posey, who sat out the COVID-19-shortened 2020 season primarily out of concern for his newly adopted daughters, heads into the 2021 season with unfamiliar uncertainty. By Opening Day, he’ll be 34 years old, entering his 11th and potentially final season as the Giants’ every-day catcher. Posey’s $167 million contract includes a $22 million club option for 2022, but the Giants also possess a promising young catcher in Joey Bart, who was drafted second overall in 2018 to someday replace Posey long term.

“Yeah, sure, it’s gone through my mind,” Posey said of the possibility that it’s his final season with the Giants. “I think, for me, my biggest goal this year is really to — as cliché as it is — go one day at a time and try to focus on what needs to be accomplished for that day, whether it’s stuff in the weight room or cage work or whatever it may be. And try not to get too far ahead.”

The last time Posey was on the field, he was coming off hip surgery and struggling through the 2019 season, ultimately batting .257/.320/.368 with seven homers and 24 doubles in 114 games. In the seven prior seasons, he made six All-Star teams, won an MVP award and batted .308/.378/.466 while averaging 16 homers, 31 doubles and 141 games per year.

Giants manager Gabe Kapler said in the middle of December that Posey would return as the team’s primary catcher in 2021, offering the 24-year-old Bart more time to develop after a trying season in 2020.

Posey had access to Oracle Park when the team wasn’t there last summer and utilized the facilities to train routinely. He admitted that it might take him some time to get re-acclimated to live pitching but said he believes his body is in good enough shape to stand up to the rigors of another season. He missed the competition.

“It’s nice,” Posey said of returning to play. “It’s different. Look at what we’re doing right now [conducting an interview over video conference] — it’s not the same. You’re still in masks, so that’s obviously different as well. There’s normalcy, too. There’s the normalcy of standing on the foul line and stretching. Playing catch, catching ‘pens. Yeah, it’s great to be back, and hopefully as this vaccine continues to roll out, we’ll be able to all get to experience the game like we’re used to.”

Read original article here

The Colossal Weight of Cities Is Making Them Sink, Even as Sea Levels Are Rising

Cities don’t just have sea level rises to worry about – they’re also slowly sinking under the weight of their own development, according to new research, which emphasises the importance of factoring subsidence into models of climate change risk.

 

Geophysicist Tom Parsons, from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) agency, looked at San Francisco as a case study of how large urban developments could be affecting and depressing the actual surface of the Earth.

By his calculations, San Francisco might have sunk as much as 80 millimetres (3.1 inches) as the city has grown over time. Considering the Bay Area is under threat from as much as 300 mm (11.8 inches) of sea level rise by 2050, the extra variation added by slow subsidence is significant enough to be concerning.

“As global populations move disproportionately toward the coasts, this additional subsidence in combination with expected sea level rise may exacerbate risk associated with inundation,” writes Parsons in his paper.

Taking into account an inventory of all the buildings in the city and their contents, the study calculated the weight of San Francisco (population: 7.75 million) as being around 1.6 trillion kilograms – about 3.5 trillion pounds, or roughly 8.7 million Boeing 747s.

That could be enough to both bend the actual lithosphere on which the urban centre sits, and perhaps more significantly, to change the relative levels of fault blocks – the floating chunks of rock that make up Earth’s surface.

 

In fact the 80 mm of slip is likely to be a conservative estimate, as the weight calculations didn’t include things outside buildings – including transport infrastructure, vehicles, or people. The same sort of sinking is likely in other parts of the world, though it partially depends on the local geology.

“The specific results found for the San Francisco Bay Area are likely to apply to any major urban centre, though with varying importance,” writes Parsons.

“Anthropogenic loading effects at tectonically active continental margins are likely greater than more stable continental interiors where the lithosphere tends to be thicker and more rigid.”

There are plenty of other causes of subsidence to think about too, including tectonic plate shifting and the groundwater pumping necessary to support a growing population – something we’ve seen cause significant city sinking in other parts of the world.

While this current study only looked at San Francisco, and made some broad assumptions in terms of modelling, the findings are notable enough to make city weight another consideration when scientists are figuring out how geography might change over time, and which areas are under threat as the sea level gets higher.

There’s still plenty of detail to dig into as well, particularly in cities already under threat from subsidence. The compaction of sediment and aquifer systems under San Francisco International Airport on the coast – the heaviest building in the city – has already been calculated as causing 4 mm (0.16 inches) of sinking each year.

“It should be possible to improve on the methods presented here by using satellite or air photos to make more detailed analyses in likely flood zones,” writes Parsons.

“Such detailed analyses might also yield better insights about changes to subsurface porosity changes and resultant fluid flow.”

The research has been published in AGU Advances.

 

Read original article here

San Francisco 49ers’ QB: Betting odds on Watson, Darnold and Garoppolo

The new NFL league year begins in a little more than a month, but the excitement is already here for the offseason.

This year’s quarterback market is unprecedented, with several starters from 2020 who could be wearing a different uniform next season. The Detroit Lions have already sent Matthew Stafford to the Los Angeles Rams for Jared Goff and draft picks. We could also see some more significant trades over the next few months involving more quarterbacks.

Deshaun Watson remains the best of the bunch. The 25-year-old has officially requested a trade from the Houston Texans, who are adamant that they will not trade Watson anytime soon. Watson holds a no-trade clause, so we could see a long stalemate between the two parties.

The New York Jets and new head coach Robert Saleh hold the No. 2 overall pick in this year’s NFL Draft and could move on from 2018 third overall pick, Sam Darnold.

San Francisco seems content moving forward with current starter Jimmy Garoppolo but has been linked to virtually every quarterback on the market since the season ended.

The betting lines for where some QBs will land this offseason have the Niners listed as options.

Here are where oddsmakers have the 49ers in the running for Watson (courtesy of Bovada):

Texans +200
PreDolphins and Jets +350
Panthers +400
49ers +500
Broncos +800
Raiders andPatriots +1400

For Darnold (courtesy of Draft Kings):

Jets +150
Colts +400
Panthers and Texans +500
Broncos +1000
49ers and WFT +1100
Bears +1200
Saints and Steelers +1400

Bovada also has odds up for where Russell Wilson, Dak Prescott and Carson Wentz will play in 2021.

Wilson — who voiced his displeasure with the Seahawks’ ability to protect him on the field — is a long-shot to be moved. Bovada has him staying in Seattle as the most likely outcome and has San Francisco listed at +2200.

Prescott has been at an impasse with the Dallas Cowboys regarding his contract situation for more than a year. Bovada has him at -1000 to re-sign with the Cowboys while the Niners come in at +2000. The 49ers aren’t listed among the teams who have the best odds to land Wentz.

The most likely scenario is that Garoppolo will be the starter in 2021. BetMGM has odds available on where Jimmy G will play next season, and it’s no surprise to see San Francisco as the favorite:

49ers (-400)
Patriots (+450)
Vikings (+750)
Broncos (+800)
Bears (+800)
Colts (+1000)
Texans (+1100)

Let’s not forget that oddsmakers had the 49ers as the favorites to land Stafford and had the Rams way down the list prior to the trade:

It would take a massive haul to get Watson out of Houston, while Darnold won’t net nearly as much in any trade. Matt Maiocco of NBC Bay Area wrote an interesting piece about why no current player on the Niners roster should be untouchable when it comes to landing a franchise QB.

Maiocco is well plugged-in with the 49ers and says not even Nick Bosa, George Kittle or Fred Warner should be off-limits. The chances are that one of them would have to be included with some high draft picks to land a talent like Watson.

As of now, Garoppolo returning is listed as the favorite with good reason. San Francisco will still be in a position to contend with all of the high-end talents around him on the roster. We saw Jimmy G lead a healthy squad to a 13-3 finish in 2019 and be within seven minutes of winning the Super Bowl.

But if John Lynch and Kyle Shanahan decide they’re willing to try and meet the asking price for Watson, it should make for an interesting few weeks.

What do you think would be a fair trade proposal to land Watson? Who would you be willing to part with out of Bosa, Kittle or Warner, if it meant Watson would be the 49ers’ QB for the next decade?



Read original article here

Todd McShay mock draft sends Trevon Moehrig to San Francisco 49ers

While the 49ers find themselves with more draft picks this year than they had a season ago, and with more holes for those draft picks to fill, it still wouldn’t be a surprise to see them trade back in the first round from the No. 12 overall pick. ESPN’s Todd McShay illustrated one scenario where San Francisco moves back to pick up some significant draft capital, but his selection is a little head-scratching.

A trade back would make a lot of sense for the 49ers in a scenario where all four quarterbacks go in the first four picks, which is how McShay’s mock plays out. If San Francisco was going to stay put at 12 for a quarterback, it’d probably need to be one of the top prospects like Zach Wilson, Justin Fields or Trey Lance. The likelihood they take a QB for the sake of taking one with the 12th pick seems low.

With no top QBs slipping, the 49ers trade with the Bears. Chicago lands the 12th pick in exchange for No. 20, No. 52 and either a first or second-round selection in the 2022 draft. That’s a massive haul for San Francisco to jump back eight spots where they’d still pick in the top 20. It would also give them two second-round picks that they could use to either maneuver up into the back end of the first round, or deal to scoop a third-round pick after sending theirs to Washington in the Trent Williams trade.

All of this makes a lot of sense for San Francisco. Their pick via McShay is a touch perplexing though given their laundry list of needs. With the No. 20 choice, the 49ers in McShay’s mock draft snag TCU safety Trevon Moehrig.

The 6-2, 202-pound safety could conceivably be a long-term answer for the 49ers’ secondary with Jaquiski Tartt headed for free agency and Jimmie Ward’s future uncertain beyond his contract which ends after the 2022 season. Moehrig isn’t likely to step into a box safety role like the one Tartt often occupied. If the 49ers pick him, it could signal a change in defensive philosophy, or a move for Ward to nickel cornerback with K’Waun Williams tabbed for unrestricted free agency.

Another player available at No. 20 is Michigan defensive end Kwity Paye, who goes 21st to the Colts in McShay’s mock. Paye is a 6-4, 272-pound defensive end who racked up 16.5 tackles for loss and 8.5 sacks over his final 16 games for the Wolverines. He’s a good athlete with some versatility that could play well in a 49ers front that desperately needs edge help.

While the player taken with the pick can be debated, and the team’s needs will likely change after free agency, this kind of trade back can be expected if the offer is there. Unless the 49ers believe there’s a can’t-miss prospect at 12, it’d behoove them to slide back a few spots to pick up some draft capital that gives them more flexibility on Days 2 and 3 in a year where they need to restock their roster with cheap rookie talent.

Read original article here