Tag Archives: ESGGOV

Spirit ends sale to Frontier as JetBlue talks continue

July 27 (Reuters) – Spirit Airlines Inc (SAVE.N) canceled its $2.7 billion sale to Frontier Group Holdings Inc (ULCC.O) on Wednesday after Spirit shareholders balked at supporting it, leaving JetBlue Airways Corp (JBLU.O) with an opening to clinch a deal.

The development, first reported by Reuters on Wednesday, came after Spirit pushed back a shareholder vote on the Frontier deal four times, hoping it could muster enough support. Spirit had earlier argued that antitrust regulators were unlikely to clear JetBlue’s $3.7 billion bid.

The outcome was a setback for Frontier and its chairman Bill Franke, who was instrumental in kicking off talks between the sides last year. Franke’s airline-focused buyout firm, Indigo Partners, is a major shareholder in Frontier.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

“While we are disappointed that Spirit Airlines shareholders failed to recognize the value and consumer potential inherent in our proposed combination, the Frontier board took a disciplined approach,” Franke said in a statement.

A Frontier-Spirit combination would have reshaped the domestic travel landscape and marked the most consequential U.S. airline industry merger since Alaska Air Group bought Virgin America Inc for $2.6 billion in 2016.

JetBlue sees Spirit as an opportunity to expand its domestic footprint at a time when the U.S. airline industry is dogged by labor and aircraft shortages.

A sale of Spirit to Frontier or JetBlue would create the fifth-largest U.S. airline. Negotiations between JetBlue and Spirit are progressing favorably and a deal is possible in the next few weeks, according to people familiar with the matter.

“We are pleased that the merger agreement with Frontier has been terminated and we are engaged in ongoing discussions with Spirit toward a consensual agreement as soon as possible,” JetBlue said in a statement.

But Spirit also could choose to remain independent.

ANTITRUST RISK

Spirit has expressed concern about JetBlue’s Northeast Alliance (NEA) partnership with American Airlines (AAL.O). The U.S. Justice Department filed an antitrust lawsuit against American and JetBlue in September seeking to end the alliance, saying it would lead to higher fares in busy airports in the U.S. Northeast.

JetBlue so far has refused to pull out of the alliance and instead offered other sweeteners like a higher breakup fee and route divestments.

Frontier shares rose 6.4% to close at $11.27 as investors expressed relief that the company exited what had become a bidding war for Spirit. Spirit shares rose 4% to $24.30, while JetBlue shares rose 3.6% to $8.35.

With the end of the proposed Spirit-Frontier tie-up, Spirit will pay Frontier $25 million for merger-related costs that it incurred. As per the terms of the deal, Spirit would owe Frontier an additional $69 million if it ends up striking a merger deal with JetBlue or any other competitor within the next 12 months.

“Now that Spirit Airlines has terminated the Frontier merger agreement, we hope that Frontier management will put aside its merger distraction and invest the same amount of resources and focus to improving conditions at their own airline,” said the Frontier pilots’ union, which is a subset of the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA).

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Anirban Sen and Greg Roumeliotis in New York, additional reporting by David Shepardson
Editing by Chizu Nomiyama, Will Dunham, Matthew Lewis and David Gregorio

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Exclusive: Cassava Sciences faces U.S. criminal probe tied to Alzheimer’s drug, sources say

WASHINGTON, July 27 (Reuters) – The U.S. Justice Department has opened a criminal investigation into Cassava Sciences Inc (SAVA.O) involving whether the biotech company manipulated research results for its experimental Alzheimer’s drug, two people familiar with the inquiry said.

The Justice Department personnel conducting the investigation into Austin, Texas-based Cassava specialize in examining whether companies or individuals have misled or defrauded investors, government agencies or consumers, according to the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity. The sources did not provide details of the focus of the probe and whether the department was looking into any specific individuals.

As in any Justice Department investigation, this one could lead to criminal charges or be closed without any charges being brought.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

In an emailed statement, Kate Watson Moss, a lawyer representing Cassava, neither confirmed nor denied the existence of the Justice Department criminal probe.

“To be clear: Cassava Sciences vehemently denies any and all allegations of wrongdoing,” Watson Moss said, adding that the company “has never been charged with a crime, and for good reason – Cassava Sciences has never engaged in criminal conduct.”

Watson Moss added that Cassava Sciences has received confidential requests for information from government agencies, but declined to identify those agencies. Watson Moss said that “Cassava Sciences has provided information in response to these requests in full satisfaction of its legal obligations.” Watson Moss added that no government agency has accused the company of wrongdoing.

A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment.

The company already was facing scrutiny from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and investors after two physicians from outside Cassava last year made allegations of data manipulation and misrepresentation involving research underpinning the company’s Alzheimer’s drug, called simufilam.

Cassava, a small company with about two dozen employees, in a statement last year called the allegations of data manipulation and misrepresentation “false and misleading.”

Cassava on its website describes simufilam as taking an “entirely new approach” to treating Alzheimer’s, the most common form of dementia and a progressive brain disorder that affects nearly 6 million Americans. The oral medication restores the normal shape and function of a key protein in the brain, the company said.

A PETITION TO THE FDA

The criminal investigation began, according to the sources, sometime after a petition was filed in August 2021 with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration by a lawyer on behalf of two physicians asking the agency to halt clinical trials of simufilam. The physicians are David Bredt, a neuroscientist formerly at Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen, and Geoffrey Pitt, a cardiologist who serves as director of Weill Cornell Medicine’s Cardiovascular Research Institute in New York.

The petition filed by Jordan Thomas, a New York-based lawyer representing both doctors, said Cassava’s published studies on clinical trials involving simufilam in various journals contained data misrepresentation and images of experiments that appeared to have been manipulated by photo-editing software. The FDA denied the petition and let the trials proceed.

Bredt and Pitt disclosed last November in an article published by The Wall Street Journal that they shorted Cassava’s stock, betting that the price would go down once investors learned of the manipulation they alleged. They later told The New Yorker magazine that they no longer have a short position in Cassava, a claim Reuters could not independently verify.

The short-selling represents “a major conflict of interest,” Watson Moss said in her statement to Reuters.

“Cassava Sciences is interested in helping those with Alzheimer’s disease, not an easy payday,” Watson Moss added.

STOCK DROP

Cassava’s stock fell precipitously following the petition filed with the FDA by Thomas, presenting an opportunity for Bredt and Pitt to profit on their bet against the company.

Thomas declined to comment on the matter.

The FDA in February said the so-called citizen petition filed by the two physicians urging it to launch an investigation into simufilam was not a proper avenue for such a request. Requests for the FDA to initiate an enforcement action, meanwhile, are “expressly excluded from the scope of the FDA’s citizen petition procedures,” the agency said, adding that it exercises its own discretion on such matters.

An FDA spokesperson declined to comment.

Cassava shares rose on Nasdaq from around $7 in January 2021 to above $135 in July 2021 on investor hopes that the company was on the verge of a breakthrough in treating Alzheimer’s. The stock plunged weeks later following word of the petition questioning Cassava’s research results.

The company’s shares closed at $21.72 on Tuesday.

Cassava has received more than $20 million from the U.S. National Institutes of Health to support developing simufilam.

The NIH told Reuters it does not discuss potential cases of research misconduct related to grants but that officials “take research misconduct very seriously. Research misconduct may distort NIH funding decisions, the overall integrity of the research we support and the public’s trust in science and resulting outcomes.”

Cassava also is facing the SEC investigation, the sources said. The Wall Street Journal last November first reported on the SEC probe, saying the agency was examining the claims made in the FDA petition. Reuters was unable to determine what specific claims, if any, drew the agency’s scrutiny.

An SEC spokesperson said the agency “does not comment on the existence or nonexistence of a possible investigation.”

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Marisa Taylor in Washington and Mike Spector in New York; Editing by Will Dunham and Michele Gershberg

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Credit Suisse found guilty in cocaine cash laundering case

  • Credit Suisse first major Swiss bank to face criminal trial
  • Former banker found guilty of qualified money laundering
  • Bank plans to appeal

BELLINZONA, Switzerland, June 27 (Reuters) – Credit Suisse (CSGN.S) was convicted by Switzerland’s Federal Criminal Court on Monday of failing to prevent money-laundering by a Bulgarian cocaine trafficking gang in the country’s first criminal trial of one of its major banks. read more

A former employee was found guilty of money-laundering in the trial, which included testimony on murders and cash stuffed into suitcases and is seen as a test case for prosecutors taking a tougher line against the country’s banks.

The ruling marks another headache for Switzerland’s second-biggest bank, which has been reeling from billions in losses racked up via risk-management and compliance blunders.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Federal prosecutor Alice de Chambrier welcomed the verdict as “good for transparency”.

Both Credit Suisse and the former employee had denied wrongdoing.

Credit Suisse said it would appeal against the conviction. read more

The judges looked at whether Credit Suisse and the former employee did enough to prevent the cocaine trafficking gang from laundering profits through the bank from 2004 to 2008. read more

The court said on Monday it found deficiencies within Credit Suisse both with regard to the management of client relations with the criminal organisation and with regard to the monitoring of the implementation anti-money laundering rules.

“These deficiencies enabled the withdrawal of the criminal organisation’s assets, which was the basis for the conviction of the bank’s former employee for qualified money laundering,” the court said.

“The company could have prevented the infringement if it had fulfilled its organisational obligations,” the presiding judge said in handing down the verdict, adding that the former employee’s superiors had been “passive”.

Credit Suisse said the case arose from a investigation that dated back more than 14 years.

“Credit Suisse is continuously testing its anti-money laundering framework and has been strengthening it over time, in accordance with evolving regulatory standards,” the bank said.

“Generating compliant business growth in line with legal and regulatory requirements is key for Credit Suisse.”

Credit Suisse was fined 2 million Swiss francs ($2.1 million). The court also ordered the confiscation of assets worth more than 12 million francs that the drug gang held in accounts at Credit Suisse, and ordered the bank to relinquish more than 19 million francs — the amount that could not be confiscated due to internal deficiencies at Credit Suisse.

The court handed the former employee, who cannot be named under Swiss privacy laws, a suspended 20-month prison sentence and a fine for money laundering.

The logo of Swiss bank Credit Suisse is seen at its headquarters at the Paradeplatz square in Zurich, Switzerland October 1, 2019. REUTERS/Arnd Wiegmann

The presiding judge said she had failed to fulfil her role in the bank’s “first line of defence”.

The former banker’s attorney said she would appeal against the “unfounded and unfair decision”, noting she had not made any financial gain.

“This judgment places the responsibility for money laundering on people without any serious training or experience,” her attorney said.

Credit Suisse shares closed up 0.4%, while the European banking sector index (.SX7P) rose 0.3%. They are down more than 40% in the past year.

LEGAL ACTION

Corruption and money laundering experts had said the fact that Switzerland had taken legal action against a global banking player like Credit Suisse could send a powerful message in a country famous for its banking industry.

“This has the potential to be a watershed moment for Switzerland,” Mark Pieth, a money laundering expert at the University of Basel, said on the eve of the trial.

“What is significant about this case is that Switzerland is taking legal action against a company and not just any company – Credit Suisse is one of the jewels in the Swiss crown.”

Swiss private banks have adopted tougher anti-money laundering checks after an international regulatory crackdown to prevent money laundering.

Under Swiss law, a company can be held liable for inadequate organisation or failing to take all reasonable measures to prevent a crime from happening.

In the Credit Suisse case, prosecutors alleged the former relationship manager helped to conceal the criminal origins of money for clients through more than 146 million Swiss francs in transactions, including 43 million francs in cash, some of it stuffed into suitcases. read more

The relationship manager, who left Credit Suisse in 2010, was not in the courtroom on Monday.

During court hearings in February, the former relationship manager said Credit Suisse learned of murders and cocaine smuggling allegedly connected to the Bulgarian gang but continued to manage cash that became the focus of the trial.

The former banker said during the hearings she informed her managers about events, including two murders, associated with the clients, but that they decided to pursue the business nonetheless.

Credit Suisse has disputed the illegal origin of the money, saying that a former Bulgarian wrestler and his circle operated legitimate businesses in construction, leasing and hotels.

($1 = 0.9594 Swiss francs)

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Paul Carrel, Additional reporting by Brenna Hughes Neghaiwi and John O’Donnell; Editing by Michael Shields and Jane Merriman

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Amazon shareholders vote against investor-led proposals

BOSTON/NEW YORK May 25 (Reuters) – Amazon.com Inc (AMZN.O) shareholders on Wednesday voted against all investor-led resolutions that challenged the company’s policies – including its use of plastics and certain concealment clauses in contracts – at the company’s annual meeting.

A total of 15 investor resolutions were considered, including one introduced at the meeting. The figure was a record for the retail and cloud computing giant, as socially minded investors scrutinize its treatment of workers. read more

Investors voted for proposals to approve executive compensation, board members and a stock split. read more

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

The boost in the number of resolutions, which Amazon recommended investors vote against, comes as tech company shareholders push for more transparency on social issues such as pay equity, workplace culture and safety, and sustainability practices.

Antoine Argouges, CEO of activist investor Tulipshare, said in a statement that the company will continue its push for workers’ rights at Amazon.

“Whilst we are disappointed that our proposal did not pass today, this vote was just the beginning in the fight for workers rights,” Argouges said.

Amazon Chief Executive Andy Jassy defended the company’s record on safety and reviewed steps it has taken to reduce injury rates ranging from new anti-slip shoes to software meant to predict and prevent repetitive stress injuries.

He conceded that injury rates could be affected by the rapid hiring of new workers during the pandemic, including about 300,000 workers in 2021 alone. “When you hire a lot of people, your (injury) rates tend to go up,” he said.

The number of proposals also reflects changes under securities regulators appointed by U.S. President Joe Biden that have made it easier for investors to file proposals and more difficult for companies to convince regulators that these resolutions should not go to a shareholder vote. read more

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Ross Kerber in Boston, Arriana McLymore in New York and Eva Mathews in Bengaluru
Additional reporting by Simon Jessop in London
Editing by Peter Henderson and Matthew Lewis

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Arriana McLymore

Thomson Reuters

Arriana McLymore reports on the business of law, including diversity in the profession, corporate practices, legal education and attorney career life cycles.

Read original article here

Tesla removed from S&P 500 ESG Index, prompting Musk pushback

May 18 (Reuters) – S&P Dow Jones Indices has removed electric carmaker Tesla Inc (TSLA.O) from its widely-followed S&P 500 ESG Index (.SPXESUP), citing issues including racial discrimination claims and crashes linked to its autopilot vehicles, a move that prompted critical tweets from Tesla CEO Elon Musk on Wednesday.

Other contributing factors to the changes, effective May 2, included Tesla’s lack of published details related to its low carbon strategy or business conduct codes, said Margaret Dorn, the organization’s head of ESG indices for North America, in an interview.

Even though Tesla is contributing to reducing emissions with its electric cars, Dorn said, its issues and lack of disclosures relative to industry peers should raise concerns for investors looking to judge the company across environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

“You can’t just take a company’s mission statement at face value, you have to look at their practices across all those key dimensions,” she said.

Tesla representatives did not immediately respond to questions. But after the index changes, Tesla CEO Elon Musk tweeted on Wednesday that “ESG is a scam. It has been weaponized by phony social justice warriors.”

The back-and-forth underscores a growing controversy about how to judge corporate ESG performance. Investors concerned about issues like diversity and climate change have poured money into funds using ESG criteria to pick stocks, prompting questions about how effectively the funds promote change or whether they have become too involved in setting policy. read more

S&P Dow Jones Indices is majority-owned by S&P Global Inc. (SPGI.N).

The removal Tesla was among a group of changes made to the S&P 500 ESG Index dating from April 22, according to an announcement. Among the additions to the index at the same time was Twitter Inc (TWTR.N), the social media platform Musk has under agreement to purchase.

Dorn and others did not immediately describe the reasons Twitter was added.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Ross Kerber; Editing by Aurora Ellis

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Allianz to pay $6 bln in U.S. fraud case, fund managers charged

NEW YORK/MUNICH, May 17 (Reuters) – Germany’s Allianz SE (ALVG.DE) agreed to pay more than $6 billion and its U.S. asset management unit will plead guilty to criminal securities fraud over the collapse of its Structured Alpha funds early in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Allianz’s settlements with the U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission are among the largest in corporate history, and dwarf earlier corporate settlements obtained under President Joe Biden’s administration.

Gregoire Tournant, the former chief investment officer who created and oversaw the now-defunct Structured Alpha funds, is also being indicted for fraud, conspiracy and obstruction, while two portfolio managers entered related guilty pleas.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Once with more than $11 billion of assets under management, the Structured Alpha funds lost more than $7 billion as the spread of COVID-19 roiled markets in February and March 2020.

Prosecutors said Allianz Global Investors US LLC misled teacher pension funds, clergy, bus drivers, engineers and other investors by understating the funds’ risks, and displayed “significant gaps” in its monitoring of the funds. read more

Investors were told the funds employed options that included hedges to protect against market crashes, but prosecutors said the fund managers repeatedly failed to buy those hedges.

The managers also inflated fund performance to boost their own pay, collecting 30% of excess returns over relevant benchmarks as a performance fee, prosecutors said.

Tournant’s pay was the highest or second-highest in his unit from 2015 to 2019, including $13 million in 2019, court papers show.

At a news conference, U.S. Attorney Damian Williams in Manhattan said more than 100,000 investors were harmed, and that while U.S. prosecutors rarely bring criminal charges against companies it was “the right thing to do.”

Investors “were promised a relatively safe investment with strict risk controls designed to weather a sudden storm, like a massive collapse in the stock market,” he said. “Those promises were lies…. Today is the day for accountability.”

BLAME COVID, DEFENDANT’S LAWYERS SAY

Also known for its insurance operations, Allianz is among Germany’s most recognizable brands and an Olympic sponsor.

Its namesake arena near its Munich headquarters, meanwhile, houses Bayern Munich, one of world’s best-known soccer teams.

Tuesday’s settlement calls for Allianz to pay a $2.33 billion criminal fine, make $3.24 billion of restitution and forfeit $463 million, court papers show.

Williams said the fine was significantly reduced because of the compensation Allianz offered to investors.

Even so, the payout is close to twice the $3.3 billion that the Justice Department collected in corporate penalties for all of 2021.

Allianz also agreed to a $675 million civil fine to settle with the SEC, one of that regulator’s largest penalties since the implosions of Enron Corp and WorldCom Inc two decades ago.

The company previously set aside enough money to cover the settlement. While the debacle had frustrated shareholders and prompted some top Allianz managers to cut their own pay, the group’s shares closed up 1.7% in Germany after the total payout broadly matched its provisions.

Two former Structured Alpha portfolio managers, Stephen Bond-Nelson and Trevor Taylor, agreed to plead guilty to fraud and conspiracy charges and entered cooperation agreements.

Tournant, who joined Allianz in 2002 and founded the funds three years later, surrendered to authorities on Tuesday morning in Denver, and according to his lawyers will fight the charges.

“Greg Tournant has been unfairly targeted,” his lawyers Seth Levine and Daniel Alonso said in a joint statement. “We have faith that the justice system will reject this meritless and ill-considered attempt by the government to criminalize the impact of the unprecedented, COVID-induced market dislocation.”

Lawyers for Bond-Nelson and Taylor declined immediate comment.

VOYA PARTNERSHIP

Allianz’s guilty plea carries a 10-year ban on Allianz Global Investors’ providing advisory services to U.S.-registered investment funds.

As a result, Allianz agreed to move about $120 billion of investor assets to Voya Financial Inc (VOYA.N), in exchange for up to a 24% stake in Voya’s investment management unit.

Regulators said the misconduct included a situation where he and Bond-Nelson altered more than 75 risk reports before sending them to investors, to reduce projected losses in market-stress scenarios.

The SEC said projected losses in one market crash scenario were changed to 4.15% from the actual 42.15%, simply by removing the “2.”

Allianz’s alleged oversight lapses included a failure to ensure that Tournant was using his promised hedges, though only people in his group knew of the misconduct before March 2020.

“No compliance system is perfect, but the controls at AGI didn’t even stand a chance,” Williams said.

Bond-Nelson, at Tournant’s direction, also lied to Allianz’s in-house lawyers after the company learned about the altered reports and the SEC probe, prosecutors added.

“Unfortunately, we’ve seen a recent string of cases in which derivatives and complex products have harmed investors across market sectors,” SEC Chair Gary Gensler said in a statement.

Investors have also filed more than two dozen lawsuits against Allianz over the Structured Alpha funds.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York and Tom Sims and Alexander Huebner in Munich; Additional reporting by Luc Cohen in New York; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama and Tomasz Janowski

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

U.S., Chinese regulators in talks for audit deal -sources

Chinese and U.S. flags flutter outside the building of an American company in Beijing, China January 21, 2021. REUTERS/Tingshu Wang

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

HONG KONG, May 6 (Reuters) – U.S. and Chinese regulatory officials are in talks to settle a long-running dispute over the auditing compliance of U.S.-listed Chinese firms, three people briefed on the matter told Reuters.

The standoff, if not resolved, could see Chinese firms kicked off New York bourses.

The U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) denied an earlier Reuters report that said a team from the agency had arrived in Beijing for talks.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

This week the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) added over 80 firms, including e-commerce giant JD.com (9618.HK) and China Petroleum & Chemical Corp (600028.SS) to the list of companies facing possible expulsion. read more

The talks between officials from the PCAOB and their counterparts at the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) can be described as “late stage” after China made concessions in recent months, the people said.

But a PCAOB spokesperson said, “Recent reports that PCAOB officials are currently in China, or that PCAOB officials were in China earlier this year to conduct face-to-face negotiations, are untrue. The PCAOB has not sent any personnel to China since 2017.”

He said the board continues to engage with the Chinese authorities but “speculation about a final agreement remains premature.” As a result, the PCAOB is planning “for various scenarios”.

The CSRC on Friday did not respond directly on the status of discussions. It referred Reuters to official statements from both sides but did not specify which statements.

The sources asked not to be identified due to the sensitivity of the issue.

Authorities in China have long been reluctant to let overseas regulators inspect local accounting firms, citing national security concerns.

But in a key concession, Chinese regulators last month proposed revising confidentiality rules for offshore listings and scrapping requirements that on-site inspections of overseas-listed Chinese firms be conducted mainly by domestic regulators. read more

Sources told Reuters last month that a preliminary framework for audit supervision cooperation between the two countries has been formed. read more

The spat over audit oversight of New York-listed Chinese companies, simmering for more than a decade, came to a head in December when the SEC finalised rules to delist Chinese companies under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act. It said there were 273 companies at risk but did not name them.

As of Friday, the PCAOB has identified 128 Chinese firms as at risk of being delisted.

The issue has been a major factor dragging on American depositary receipts (ADRs) issued by Chinese firms, with the Nasdaq Golden Dragon China Index tumbling 57% over the past 12 months.

Goldman Sachs estimated in March that U.S. institutional investors held around $200 billion worth of Chinese ADRs.

In addition to the concessions by Chinese regulators, there have been other signs that a deal is in the offing.

In late March, sources said the CSRC asked some of the country’s U.S.-listed firms, including Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (9988.HK), Baidu Inc (9888.HK) and JD.com, to prepare for more audit disclosures. Late last month, Fang Xinghai, the CSRC’s vice chairman said he expected a deal in the near future.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Xie Yu; Additional reporting by Katanga Johnson in Washington, Selena Li in Hong Kong and Jing Xu in Beijing; Editing by Edwina Gibbs and William Mallard

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Musk’s $44 billion Twitter buyout challenged in shareholder lawsuit

May 6 (Reuters) – Elon Musk and Twitter Inc (TWTR.N) were sued on Friday by a Florida pension fund seeking to stop Musk from completing his $44 billion takeover of the social media company before 2025.

In a proposed class action filed in Delaware Chancery Court, the Orlando Police Pension Fund said Delaware law forbade a quick merger because Musk had agreements with other big Twitter shareholders, including his financial adviser Morgan Stanley (MS.N) and Twitter founder Jack Dorsey, to support the buyout.

The fund said those agreements made Musk, who owns 9.6% of Twitter, the effective “owner” of more than 15% of the company’s shares. It said that required delaying the merger by three years unless two-thirds of shares not “owned” by him granted approval.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Morgan Stanley owns about 8.8% of Twitter shares and Dorsey owns 2.4%.

Musk hopes to complete his $54.20 per share Twitter takeover this year, in one of the world’s largest leveraged buyouts.

He also runs electric car company Tesla Inc (TSLA.O), leads The Boring Co and SpaceX, and is the world’s richest person according to Forbes magazine.

Twitter and its board, including Dorsey and Chief Executive Parag Agrawal, were also named as defendants.

Twitter declined to comment. Lawyers for Musk and the Florida fund did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The lawsuit also seeks to declare that Twitter directors breached their fiduciary duties, and recoup legal fees and costs. It did not make clear how shareholders believed they might be harmed if the merger closed on schedule.

On Thursday, Musk said he had raised around $7 billion, including from sovereign wealth funds and friends in Silicon Valley, to help fund a takeover. read more

Musk had no financing lined up when he announced plans to buy Twitter last month.

Some of the new investors appear to share interests with Musk, a self-described free speech absolutist who could change how the San Francisco-based company moderates content.

Florida’s state pension fund also invests in Twitter, and Governor Ron DeSantis said this week it could make a $15 million to $20 million profit if Musk completed his buyout.

In afternoon trading, Twitter shares were down 60 cents at $49.76.

The case is Orlando Police Pension Fund v Twitter Inc et al, Delaware Chancery Court, No. 2022-0396.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York
Editing by Howard Goller and Mark Potter

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Berkshire shareholders vote to keep Buffett as chairman, reject climate disclosures

OMAHA, Neb., April 30 (Reuters) – Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRKa.N) shareholders on Saturday rejected proposals to have an independent chair replace Warren Buffett, and require his company to disclose more about its climate-related risks and efforts to improve diversity.

Shareholders supported letting Buffett keep both the chairman and chief executive roles by a nearly 6-to-1 margin, Berkshire said at its annual meeting in Omaha, Nebraska.

Buffett, 91, has run Berkshire since 1965.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

The National Legal and Policy Center, a Berkshire shareholder, had said it was poor corporate governance for the legendary investor to retain both roles.

Its proposal gained greater attention when Calpers, which invested $460 billion on April 28 and is the largest U.S. public pension fund, expressed support, as it has at other companies.

Berkshire’s board, however, said Buffett should keep both roles. Buffett’s oldest son Howard Buffett, a Berkshire director, is expected to become non-executive chairman when his father is no longer in charge.

By approximately 3-to-1 margins, shareholders also rejected proposals to have the company disclose more about the climate-related risks, greenhouse gas emissions and diversity efforts in its dozens of businesses.

Berkshire’s board also opposed those proposals, saying its operating businesses already disclosed or appropriately managed environmental risks, and were committed to diversity, equity and inclusion.

The proposals faced long odds to pass, given Buffett’s control of 32% of Berkshire’s voting power. He owns approximately 16% of Berkshire’s stock.

Berkshire’s slate of 15 people to serve as directors won shareholder approval by an overwhelming margin.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Carolina Mandl and Jonathan Stempel in Omaha, Nebraska
Editing by Nick Zieminski

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Buffett reveals big investments, rails against Wall St excess at Berkshire meeting

OMAHA, Neb., April 30 (Reuters) – Warren Buffett on Saturday used the annual meeting of Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRKa.N) to reveal major new investments including a bigger stake in Activision Blizzard Inc (ATVI.O), while also railing against Wall Street excess and addressing the risks to his conglomerate of inflation and nuclear war.

The meeting in downtown Omaha, Nebraska was Berkshire’s first welcoming shareholders since 2019, before COVID-19 derailed America’s largest corporate gathering for two years.

It allowed shareholders to ask five hours of questions directly to Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger, and some questions to Vice Chairmen Greg Abel, who would become chief executive if Buffett could not serve, and Ajit Jain.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Buffett said Berkshire, long faulted for holding too much cash, boosted its combined stakes in oil company Chevron Corp (CVX.N) and “Call of Duty” game maker Activision Blizzard Inc (ATVI.O) nearly six-fold to more than $31 billion. read more

Berkshire also said first-quarter operating profit was little changed at $7.04 billion, as many of its dozens of businesses withstood supply chain disruptions caused by COVID-19 variants, the Ukraine invasion and rising costs from inflation. read more

Buffett, 91, said it “really feels good” to address shareholders in person, after holding the last two meetings without them. Attendees included JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N) Chief Executive Jamie Dimon and the actor Bill Murray.

Buffett had in his annual shareholder letter in February bemoaned the lack of investment opportunities.

That prompted a shareholder to ask what changed in March, when Berkshire bought 14.6% of Occidental Petroleum Corp (OXY.N) and agreed to buy insurer Alleghany Corp (Y.N) for $11.6 billion.

Buffett said it was simple: he turned to Occidental after reading an analyst report, and to Alleghany after its chief executive, who once led Berkshire’s General Re business, wrote to him.

“Markets do crazy things, and occasionally Berkshire gets a chance to do something,” he said. “It’s not because we’re smart…. I think we’re sane.”

Berkshire spent $51 billion on equities in the quarter, and its cash stake sank more than $40 billion to $106 billion.

But the conglomerate has many cash-generating resources, including its insurance operations, and Buffett assured that reserves won’t run dry.

“We will always have a lot of cash,” he said. “It’s like oxygen, it’s there all the time but if it disappears for a few minutes, it’s all over.”

Buffett and Jain stumbled for answers when asked about whether the Ukraine conflict could degenerate into nuclear war.

Jain, who has drawn Buffett’s praise for decades, said he had a “lack of ability” to estimate Berkshire’s insurance exposure.

Buffett added that there was a “very, very, very low” risk of a nuclear attack, though the world had “come close” during the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis.

“The world is flipping a coin every day,” Buffett said. “Berkshire does not have an answer.”

Buffett also picked on a favored target in saying stock markets sometimes resembled a casino or gambling partner.

“That existed to an extraordinary degree in the last couple of years, encouraged by Wall Street,” he said.

For his part, Munger, 98, echoed Nancy Reagan in criticizing bitcoin, saying that if an advisor suggested you put your retirement account there, “just say no.” Munger also criticized trading firm Robinhood Markets Inc. (HOOD.O) read more

He and Buffett munched their familiar candies from See’s, which Berkshire owns, and drank soda from Coca-Cola, a big Berkshire investment, at the meeting.

Abel defended Berkshire’s BNSF railroad, saying there was “more to be done” to improve operations and customer service, and compete against rival Union Pacific Corp (UNP.N).

Buffett also said Berkshire is designed to assure shareholders that the company and its business culture will survive his and Munger’s departures.

“Berkshire is built forever,” he said.

Shareholders also rejected proposals requiring Berkshire to disclose more about how its businesses promote diversity and address climate risks, and install an independent chairman to replace Buffett in that role. read more

Buffett has run Berkshire since 1965, and Mario Gabelli, chairman of Gamco Advisors and a prominent Berkshire investor, opposed ending his chairmanship.

“It’s not inappropriate for companies to look at separating the chair and CEO,” he said. “It doesn’t make sense in the case of Berkshire Hathaway because this guy has done a fantastic job for 50 years. We like the idea, but not here.”

Thousands of people massed outside the downtown arena housing the meeting before doors opened at 7 a.m. (1200 GMT).

Berkshire had projected lower attendance than in 2019, and about 10% to 15% of seats in the normally-full arena were empty.

As at other Berkshire-sponsored events this weekend, nearly all attendees did not wear masks, though all needed proof of COVID-19 vaccination. CNBC.com webcast the meeting.

“I bought a chair from Walmart so I could sit down,” said Tom Spain, founder of Henry Spain Investment Services in Market Harborough, England, who arrived at 3:15 a.m. for his third meeting. “Everyone has been using it. Next year I might bring a massive container of coffee and give it out.”

Lauritz Fenselau, a 23-year-old owner of a software startup from Frankfurt, Germany, showed up at 4 a.m. for his first meeting. “It’s like a pilgrimage,” he said.

Also sleep-deprived was Andres Avila, who arrived in Omaha from Boston just five hours before getting in line at 4:45 a.m., carrying an umbrella to fend off the rain.

“I have a bunch of my idols here,” he said.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Jonathan Stempel and Carolina Mandl in Omaha, Nebraska; editing by Megan Davies, Ros Russell and Diane Craft

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here