Tag Archives: Commodity/Financial Market News

The stock market is sliding because investors fear recession more than inflation

A stock-market paradox, in which bad news about the economy is seen as good news for equities, may have run its course. If so, investors should expect bad news to be bad news for stocks heading into the new year — and there may be plenty of it.

But first, why would good news be bad news? Investors have spent 2022 largely focused on the Federal Reserve and its rapid series of large rate hikes aimed at bringing inflation to heel. Economic news pointing to slower growth and less fuel for inflation could serve to lift stocks on the idea that the Fed could begin to slow the pace or even begin entertaining future rate cuts.

Conversely, good news on the economy could be bad news for stocks.

So what’s changed? The past week saw a softer-than-expected November consumer-price index reading. While still running mighty hot, with prices rising more than 7% year over year, investors are increasingly confident that inflation likely peaked at a roughly four-decade high above 9% in June.

See: Why November’s CPI data are seen as a ‘game-changer’ for financial markets

But the Federal Reserve and other major central banks indicated they intend to keep lifting rates, albeit at a slower pace, into 2023 and likely keep them elevated longer than investors had anticipated. That’s stoking fears that a recession is becoming more likely.

Meanwhile, markets are behaving as if the worst of the inflation scare is in the rearview mirror, with recession fears now looming on the horizon, said Jim Baird, chief investment officer of Plante Moran Financial Advisors.

That sentiment was reinforced by manufacturing data Wednesday and a weaker-than-expected retail sales reading on Thursday, Baird said, in a phone interview.

Markets are “probably headed back to a period where bad news is bad news not because rates will be driving concerns for investors, but because earnings growth will falter,” Baird said.

A ‘reverse Tepper trade’

Keith Lerner, co-chief investment officer at Truist, argued that a mirror image of the backdrop that produced what became known as the “Tepper trade,” inspired by hedge-fund titan David Tepper in September 2010, may be forming.

Unfortunately, while Tepper’s prescient call was for a “win/win scenario.” the “reverse Tepper trade” is shaping up as a lose/lose proposition, Lerner said, in a Friday note.

Tepper’s argument was that the economy was either going to get better, which would be positive for stocks and asset prices. Or, the economy would weaken, with the Fed stepping in to support the market, which would also be positive for asset prices.

The current setup is one in which the economy is going to weaken, taming inflation but also denting corporate profits and challenging asset prices, Lerner said. Or, instead, the economy remains strong, along with inflation, with the Fed and other central banks continuing to tighten policy, and challenging asset prices.

“In either case, there’s a potential headwind for investors. To be fair, there is a third path, where inflation comes down, and the economy avoids recession, the so-called soft landing. It’s possible,” Lerner wrote, but noted the path to a soft landing looks increasingly narrow.

Recession jitters were on display Thursday, when November retail sales showed a 0.6% fall, exceeding forecasts for a 0.3% decline and the biggest drop in almost a year. Also, the Philadelphia Fed’s manufacturing index rose, but remained in negative territory, disappointing expectations, while the New York Fed’s Empire State index fell.

Read: Still a bear market: S&P 500 slump signals stocks never reached ‘escape velocity’

Stocks, which had posted moderate losses after the Fed a day earlier lifted interest rates by half a percentage point, tumbled sharply. Equities extended their decline Friday, with the S&P 500
SPX,
-1.11%
logging a 2.1% weekly loss, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average
DJIA,
-0.85%
shed 1.7% and the Nasdaq Composite
COMP,
-0.97%
dropped 2.7%.

“As we move into 2023, economic data will become more of an influence over stocks because the data will tell us the answer to a very important question: How bad will the economic slowdown get? That’s the key question as we begin the new year, because with the Fed on relative policy ‘auto pilot’ (more hikes to start 2023) the key now is growth, and the potential damage from slowing growth,” said Tom Essaye, founder of Sevens Report Research, in a Friday note.

Recession watch

No one can say with complete certainty that a recession will occur in 2023, but it seems there’s no question corporate earnings will come under pressure, and that will be a key driver for markets, said Plante Moran’s Baird. And that means earnings have the potential to be a significant source of volatility in the year ahead.

“If in 2022 the story was inflation and rates, for 2023 it’s going to be earnings and recession risk,” he said.

It’s no longer an environment that favors high-growth, high risk equities, while cyclical factors could be setting up nicely for value-oriented stocks and small caps, he said.

Truist’s Lerner said that until the weight of the evidence shifts, “we maintain our overweight in fixed income, where we are focused on high quality bonds, and a relative underweight in equities.”

Within equities, Truist favors the U.S., a value tilt, and sees “better opportunities below the market’s surface,” such as the equal-weighted S&P 500, a proxy for the average stock.

Highlights of the economic calendar for the week ahead include a revised look at third-quarter gross domestic product on Thursday, along with the November index of leading economic indicators. On Friday, November personal consumption and spending data, including the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge are set for release.

Read original article here

Stocks Waver After Producer Prices Rise More Than Expected

Stocks wavered after producer-price data came in hotter than expected, disappointing investors who had hoped for signs of easing inflation before the Federal Reserve’s meeting next week.

The S&P 500 was flat on Friday morning, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average lost 0.1%. The technology-focused Nasdaq Composite rose 0.2%.

The producer-price index, which measures what suppliers are charging businesses and other customers, climbed 0.3% in November compared with the previous month, the Labor Department said Friday morning, the same as October’s revised 0.3% increase. Economists surveyed by The Wall Street Journal had expected U.S. supplier prices to increase 0.2% for November.

Investors had been hopeful that the inflation reading would offer evidence that price pressures in the U.S. are abating and would help solidify a smaller interest-rate increase next week. The Fed will make its next interest-rate decision on Wednesday, and the PPI data—combined with consumer-price data Tuesday—are expected to factor heavily into the trajectory of interest rates over the coming months.

Stock futures, which had traded higher throughout the morning, turned lower after the data’s release. Yields on U.S. government bonds rose, also reversing their performance earlier in the day.

In recent days, investors have grown increasingly worried that elevated inflation will force the Fed to keep lifting rates to higher levels than once expected, potentially pushing the U.S. economy into a recession.

“Even though the market sometimes seems to ignore Powell, thinking he’s bluffing, he keeps reiterating that he will put this economy into a recession if he has to,” said Eric Sterner, referring to Fed chairman

Jerome Powell.

Mr. Sterner, chief investment officer at Apollon Wealth Management, said he expects markets could retest their recent lows in the first and second quarter of next year.

“We’re stuck in this rut right now waiting for inflation to normalize and it may take all of next year for that to happen,” he said.

Those concerns about how high interest rates might go—and how they will affect the economy—have led to choppy trading in U.S. stocks recently and interrupted a rally that began in October. All three major U.S. indexes are on pace to end the week with losses, breaking a two-week winning streak. As of Thursday, the S&P 500 had fallen 2.7% for the week.

“The markets are so sensitive to this right now,” said Susannah Streeter, senior investment and markets analyst at

Hargreaves Lansdown.

“Although supersized rate hikes are probably in the rearview mirror, it’s about how long more gradual rate increases will continue for, and that’s why you’ve got these twin evils looming: recession and high inflation. That’s the real concern—that we’ll get a stagflation scenario.” 

The S&P 500 on Thursday snapped a five-day losing streak.



Photo:

BRENDAN MCDERMID/REUTERS

Yields on government bonds rose, with the yield on the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury note climbing to 3.525%, from 3.492% Thursday. The yield on the two-year note, which is more sensitive to near-term interest-rate expectations, rose to 4.332%. Yields rise when bond prices fall.

Brent crude, the international benchmark for oil prices, climbed 1.1% to $77 a barrel, on pace to possibly break a six-session losing streak that amounted to its longest since August 2021. Oil prices have slumped recently amid concerns that slowing economic growth will impede demand for fuel. Both Brent and its U.S. counterpart WTI—both of which reached eye-popping heights this year—are now trading lower on a year-to-date basis.

Outsize market moves have followed the release of inflation data in recent months.

“When CPI comes out slightly above or slightly below, you get massive market action,” said Brandon Pizzurro, director of public investments at GuideStone Capital Management. “Those of us that are defensively positioned are either going to really benefit from next Tuesday and Wednesday, or feel some short term pain if this Santa Claus rally is kickstarted.”

In China, major indexes climbed amid a sharp rise in property stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 2.3%. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite added 0.3%, helping it notch its sixth consecutive week of gains. Japan’s Nikkei 225 gained 1.2%.

In Europe, the pan-continental Stoxx Europe 600 rose 0.4%.

Write to Caitlin McCabe at caitlin.mccabe@wsj.com and Jack Pitcher at jack.pitcher@wsj.com 

We want to hear from you

By submitting your response to this questionnaire, you consent to Dow Jones processing your special categories of personal information and are indicating that your answers may be investigated and published by The Wall Street Journal and you are willing to be contacted by a Journal reporter to discuss your answers further. In an article on this subject, the Journal will not attribute your answers to you by name unless a reporter contacts you and you provide that consent.

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

20 dividend stocks with high yields that have become more attractive right now

Income-seeking investors are looking at an opportunity to scoop up shares of real estate investment trusts. Stocks in that asset class have become more attractive as prices have fallen and cash flow is improving.

Below is a broad screen of REITs that have high dividend yields and are also expected to generate enough excess cash in 2023 to enable increases in dividend payouts.

REIT prices may turn a corner in 2023

REITs distribute most of their income to shareholders to maintain their tax-advantaged status. But the group is cyclical, with pressure on share prices when interest rates rise, as they have this year at an unprecedented scale. A slowing growth rate for the group may have also placed a drag on the stocks.

And now, with talk that the Federal Reserve may begin to temper its cycle of interest-rate increases, we may be nearing the time when REIT prices rise in anticipation of an eventual decline in interest rates. The market always looks ahead, which means long-term investors who have been waiting on the sidelines to buy higher-yielding income-oriented investments may have to make a move soon.

During an interview on Nov 28, James Bullard, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis and a member of the Federal Open Market Committee, discussed the central bank’s cycle of interest-rate increases meant to reduce inflation.

When asked about the potential timing of the Fed’s “terminal rate” (the peak federal funds rate for this cycle), Bullard said: “Generally speaking, I have advocated that sooner is better, that you do want to get to the right level of the policy rate for the current data and the current situation.”

Fed’s Bullard says in MarketWatch interview that markets are underpricing the chance of still-higher rates

In August we published this guide to investing in REITs for income. Since the data for that article was pulled on Aug. 24, the S&P 500
SPX,
-0.50%
has declined 4% (despite a 10% rally from its 2022 closing low on Oct. 12), but the benchmark index’s real estate sector has declined 13%.

REITs can be placed broadly into two categories. Mortgage REITs lend money to commercial or residential borrowers and/or invest in mortgage-backed securities, while equity REITs own property and lease it out.

The pressure on share prices can be greater for mortgage REITs, because the mortgage-lending business slows as interest rates rise. In this article we are focusing on equity REITs.

Industry numbers

The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (Nareit) reported that third-quarter funds from operations (FFO) for U.S.-listed equity REITs were up 14% from a year earlier. To put that number in context, the year-over-year growth rate of quarterly FFO has been slowing — it was 35% a year ago. And the third-quarter FFO increase compares to a 23% increase in earnings per share for the S&P 500 from a year earlier, according to FactSet.

The NAREIT report breaks out numbers for 12 categories of equity REITs, and there is great variance in the growth numbers, as you can see here.

FFO is a non-GAAP measure that is commonly used to gauge REITs’ capacity for paying dividends. It adds amortization and depreciation (noncash items) back to earnings, while excluding gains on the sale of property. Adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) goes further, netting out expected capital expenditures to maintain the quality of property investments.

The slowing FFO growth numbers point to the importance of looking at REITs individually, to see if expected cash flow is sufficient to cover dividend payments.

Screen of high-yielding equity REITs

For 2022 through Nov. 28, the S&P 500 has declined 17%, while the real estate sector has fallen 27%, excluding dividends.

Over the very long term, through interest-rate cycles and the liquidity-driven bull market that ended this year, equity REITs have fared well, with an average annual return of 9.3% for 20 years, compared to an average return of 9.6% for the S&P 500, both with dividends reinvested, according to FactSet.

This performance might surprise some investors, when considering the REITs’ income focus and the S&P 500’s heavy weighting for rapidly growing technology companies.

For a broad screen of equity REITs, we began with the Russell 3000 Index
RUA,
-0.18%,
which represents 98% of U.S. companies by market capitalization.

We then narrowed the list to 119 equity REITs that are followed by at least five analysts covered by FactSet for which AFFO estimates are available.

If we divide the expected 2023 AFFO by the current share price, we have an estimated AFFO yield, which can be compared with the current dividend yield to see if there is expected “headroom” for dividend increases.

For example, if we look at Vornado Realty Trust
VNO,
+1.01%,
the current dividend yield is 8.56%. Based on the consensus 2023 AFFO estimate among analysts polled by FactSet, the expected AFFO yield is only 7.25%. This doesn’t mean that Vornado will cut its dividend and it doesn’t even mean the company won’t raise its payout next year. But it might make it less likely to do so.

Among the 119 equity REITs, 104 have expected 2023 AFFO headroom of at least 1.00%.

Here are the 20 equity REITs from our screen with the highest current dividend yields that have at least 1% expected AFFO headroom:

Company Ticker Dividend yield Estimated 2023 AFFO yield Estimated “headroom” Market cap. ($mil) Main concentration
Brandywine Realty Trust BDN,
+1.82%
11.52% 12.82% 1.30% $1,132 Offices
Sabra Health Care REIT Inc. SBRA,
+2.02%
9.70% 12.04% 2.34% $2,857 Health care
Medical Properties Trust Inc. MPW,
+1.90%
9.18% 11.46% 2.29% $7,559 Health care
SL Green Realty Corp. SLG,
+2.18%
9.16% 10.43% 1.28% $2,619 Offices
Hudson Pacific Properties Inc. HPP,
+1.55%
9.12% 12.69% 3.57% $1,546 Offices
Omega Healthcare Investors Inc. OHI,
+1.30%
9.05% 10.13% 1.08% $6,936 Health care
Global Medical REIT Inc. GMRE,
+2.03%
8.75% 10.59% 1.84% $629 Health care
Uniti Group Inc. UNIT,
+0.28%
8.30% 25.00% 16.70% $1,715 Communications infrastructure
EPR Properties EPR,
+0.62%
8.19% 12.24% 4.05% $3,023 Leisure properties
CTO Realty Growth Inc. CTO,
+1.58%
7.51% 9.34% 1.83% $381 Retail
Highwoods Properties Inc. HIW,
+0.76%
6.95% 8.82% 1.86% $3,025 Offices
National Health Investors Inc. NHI,
+1.90%
6.75% 8.32% 1.57% $2,313 Senior housing
Douglas Emmett Inc. DEI,
+0.33%
6.74% 10.30% 3.55% $2,920 Offices
Outfront Media Inc. OUT,
+0.70%
6.68% 11.74% 5.06% $2,950 Billboards
Spirit Realty Capital Inc. SRC,
+0.72%
6.62% 9.07% 2.45% $5,595 Retail
Broadstone Net Lease Inc. BNL,
-0.93%
6.61% 8.70% 2.08% $2,879 Industial
Armada Hoffler Properties Inc. AHH,
-0.08%
6.38% 7.78% 1.41% $807 Offices
Innovative Industrial Properties Inc. IIPR,
+1.09%
6.24% 7.53% 1.29% $3,226 Health care
Simon Property Group Inc. SPG,
+0.95%
6.22% 9.55% 3.33% $37,847 Retail
LTC Properties Inc. LTC,
+1.09%
5.99% 7.60% 1.60% $1,541 Senior housing
Source: FactSet

Click on the tickers for more about each company. You should read Tomi Kilgore’s detailed guide to the wealth of information for free on the MarketWatch quote page.

The list includes each REIT’s main property investment type. However, many REITs are highly diversified. The simplified categories on the table may not cover all of their investment properties.

Knowing what a REIT invests in is part of the research you should do on your own before buying any individual stock. For arbitrary examples, some investors may wish to steer clear of exposure to certain areas of retail or hotels, or they may favor health-care properties.

Largest REITs

Several of the REITs that passed the screen have relatively small market capitalizations. You might be curious to see how the most widely held REITs fared in the screen. So here’s another list of the 20 largest U.S. REITs among the 119 that passed the first cut, sorted by market cap as of Nov. 28:

Company Ticker Dividend yield Estimated 2023 AFFO yield Estimated “headroom” Market cap. ($mil) Main concentration
Prologis Inc. PLD,
+1.29%
2.84% 4.36% 1.52% $102,886 Warehouses and logistics
American Tower Corp. AMT,
+0.68%
2.66% 4.82% 2.16% $99,593 Communications infrastructure
Equinix Inc. EQIX,
+0.62%
1.87% 4.79% 2.91% $61,317 Data centers
Crown Castle Inc. CCI,
+1.03%
4.55% 5.42% 0.86% $59,553 Wireless Infrastructure
Public Storage PSA,
+0.11%
2.77% 5.35% 2.57% $50,680 Self-storage
Realty Income Corp. O,
+0.26%
4.82% 6.46% 1.64% $38,720 Retail
Simon Property Group Inc. SPG,
+0.95%
6.22% 9.55% 3.33% $37,847 Retail
VICI Properties Inc. VICI,
+0.41%
4.69% 6.21% 1.52% $32,013 Leisure properties
SBA Communications Corp. Class A SBAC,
+0.59%
0.97% 4.33% 3.36% $31,662 Communications infrastructure
Welltower Inc. WELL,
+2.37%
3.66% 4.76% 1.10% $31,489 Health care
Digital Realty Trust Inc. DLR,
+0.69%
4.54% 6.18% 1.64% $30,903 Data centers
Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc. ARE,
+1.38%
3.17% 4.87% 1.70% $24,451 Offices
AvalonBay Communities Inc. AVB,
+0.89%
3.78% 5.69% 1.90% $23,513 Multifamily residential
Equity Residential EQR,
+1.10%
4.02% 5.36% 1.34% $23,503 Multifamily residential
Extra Space Storage Inc. EXR,
+0.29%
3.93% 5.83% 1.90% $20,430 Self-storage
Invitation Homes Inc. INVH,
+1.58%
2.84% 5.12% 2.28% $18,948 Single-family residental
Mid-America Apartment Communities Inc. MAA,
+1.46%
3.16% 5.18% 2.02% $18,260 Multifamily residential
Ventas Inc. VTR,
+1.63%
4.07% 5.95% 1.88% $17,660 Senior housing
Sun Communities Inc. SUI,
+2.09%
2.51% 4.81% 2.30% $17,346 Multifamily residential
Source: FactSet

Simon Property Group Inc.
SPG,
+0.95%
is the only REIT to make both lists.

Read original article here

Central banks must buy bitcoin to hedge against sanctions: Harvard Ph.D. candidate

A research paper published at Harvard University is advocating that central banks should buy bitcoin
BTCUSD,
+2.41%
as a hedge against sanctions by other countries.

The paper, titled “Hedging Sanctions Risk: Cryptocurrency in Central Bank Reserves,” was authored by Ph.D. candidate Matthew Ferranti from Harvard’s economics department, and likens central banks’ gold reserves to potential bitcoin holdings.

Ferranti points out that central banks in countries across the globe should look into holding bitcoin as a hedge against possible financial sanctions. He gives the example of the unprecedented financial sanctions levied against Russia by the U.S. and many western nations following its invasion of Ukraine — billions in Russian assets were frozen after the Ukraine war began.

“Sanctions risk may diminish the appeal of U.S. Treasuries, propel broader diversification in central bank reserves, and bolster the long-run fundamental value of both cryptocurrency and gold,” Ferranti writes.

In the paper, Ferranti says El Salvador is a model for central banks owning bitcoin. The country, headed by bitcoin bull Nayib Bukele, has purchased millions of dollars worth of the crypto and has even made bitcoin an official national currency.

See also: ‘We just bought the dip’: El Salvador expands bitcoin holdings

Since the inception of popular cryptos like bitcoin and ether
ETHUSD,
+3.74%,
part of its appeal has been the lack of involvement from central banks, in favor of the decentralized nature of the digital asset.

In the wake of the recent crypto winter and collapse of popular crypto exchange FTX, as well as financial issues for crypto companies Voyager and Celsius, some crypto bulls have called for increased regulation and transparency for the industry.

The paper comes after FTX struggled with liquidity issues in November, eventually leading to a bankruptcy filing. Sam Bankman-Fried resigned as CEO and later apologized for the collapse of his former company.

See: Why do people invest in crypto? ‘It’s partly fraud and partly delusion,’ says Charlie Munger.

Also see: Tom Brady, Steph Curry and Kevin O’Leary set to lose big from FTX bankruptcy filing

Bitcoin’s price is down over 70% over the past year, and the price for ether is also down over 70% over the same period. The total market cap for all crypto nearly hit $3 trillion during parts of 2021, but is now around $800 billion.

Read original article here

Fed’s Waller says market has overreacted to consumer inflation data: ‘We’ve got a long, long way to go’

Federal Reserve Gov. Christopher Waller said Sunday that financial markets seem to have overreacted to the softer-than-expected October consumer price inflation data last week.

“It was just one data point,” Waller said, in a conversation in Sydney, Australia, sponsored by UBS.

“The market seems to have gotten way out in front over this one CPI report. Everybody should just take a deep breath, calm down. We’ve got a ways to go ” Waller said.

Investors cheered the soft CPI print, released Thursday, driving stocks up to their best week since June. The S&P 500 index
SPX,
+0.92%
closed 5.9% higher for the week.

The data showed that the yearly rate of consumer inflation fell to 7.7% from 8.2%, marking the lowest level since January. Inflation had peaked at a nearly 41-year high of 9.1% in June.

Waller said it was good there was some evidence that inflation was coming down, but noted that there were other times over the past year where it looked like inflation was turning lower.

“We’re going to see a continued run of this kind of behavior and inflation slowly starting to come down, before we really start thinking about taking our foot off the brakes here,” Waller said.

“We’ve got a long, long way to go to get inflation down. Rates are going keep going up and they are going to stay high for awhile until we see this inflation get down closer to our target,” he added.

The Fed is focused on how high rates need to get to bring inflation down, and that will depend solely on inflation, he said.

Waller said “the worst thing” the Fed could do was stop raising rates only to have inflation explode.

The 7.7% inflation rate seen in October “is enormous,” he added.

The Fed signaled at its last meeting earlier this month that it might slow down the pace of its rate hikes in coming meetings.

The central bank has boosted rates by almost 400 basis points since March, including four straight 0.75-percentage-point hikes that had been almost unheard of prior to this year.

“We’re looking at moving in paces of potentially 50 [basis points] at the next meeting or the next meeting after that,” Waller said.

The Fed will hold its next meeting on Dec. 13-14, and then again on Jan. 31-Feb. 1.

At the same time, Powell said the Fed was likely to raise rates above the 4.5%-4.75% terminal rate that they had previously expected.

“The signal was ‘quit paying attention to the pace and start paying attention to where the endpoint is going to be,’” Waller said.

In the wake of the CPI report, investors who trade fed funds futures contracts see the Fed’s terminal rate at 5%-5.25% next spring and then quickly falling back to 4.25%-4.5% by November. That’s well below the levels prior to the CPI data.

Read original article here

Crypto.com Withdrawals Rise After CEO Admits Transaction Problem

Customers pulled funds from Crypto.com over the weekend after the company’s chief executive said the cryptocurrency exchange mishandled a roughly $400 million transaction. 

Crypto.com Chief Executive

Kris Marszalek

said on Twitter that the transfer was sent to the wrong type of account on another exchange. The transfer of a large chunk of ether, a popular cryptocurrency, took place on Oct. 21, but came to light after Twitter users flagged the transfer as unusual, based on publicly available blockchain transaction records.

Concerns about Singapore-based Crypto.com spread across the internet over the weekend, with prominent digital-currency figures taking aim at the company. Cryptocurrency traders are on edge following the quick collapse of FTX, which went from one of the most trusted exchanges to bankrupt in the course of a week.

Changpeng Zhao,

chief executive at Crypto.com’s larger peer Binance, appeared to question the nature of the transfers without naming the company, which may have fueled Sunday’s withdrawals, according to crypto industry players. “If an exchange [has] to move large amounts of crypto before or after they demonstrate their wallet addresses, it is a clear sign of problems,” Mr. Zhao tweeted Sunday. 

The value of Crypto.com’s own cryptocurrency sank roughly 20% Sunday from the prior 24 hours. It traded near 6 cents apiece. 

Mr. Marszalek dismissed the concerns about Crypto.com, tweeting later on Sunday that the October transfers had “generated so much [fear, uncertainty and doubt] & speculation on Twitter” weeks later.

A spokesman for Crypto.com said that the platform was seeing higher levels of activity, noting that it had assets fully matching customer deposits. “Fluctuations in deposit and withdrawal activity does not affect our levels of service,” he added.

An outside analysis of Crypto.com’s public blockchain from Argus Inc., a blockchain analysis firm, showed that between 7 p.m. EST Saturday and 5:30 a.m. EST Sunday, users withdrew a net $14 million worth of the cryptocurrency ether and $39 million worth of other tokens tied to the Ethereum network from Crypto.com. Over that same time, Crypto.com moved $33 million from other wallets to meet customer demands, according to Argus.

It appeared that Crypto.com had enough funds to meet user withdrawals, said Owen Rapaport, co-founder of Argus.

Crypto.com is a midsize exchange. It has tried to raise its profile over the past year among retail investors. In late 2021, it sponsored the arena that is home to LeBron James and the Los Angeles Lakers, renaming it the Crypto.com Arena from the Staples Center. It also ran its first Super Bowl ad this year and is a global partner of Formula One.

The transaction that sparked concerns about Crypto.com involved the transfer of 320,000 ether—or roughly $400 million worth of the token at the time—to a wallet linked to crypto exchange Gate.io on Oct. 21. 

Over the weekend, Mr. Marszalek said on Twitter that the transfer was supposed to be a “move to a new cold storage address,” but was sent to an external exchange address.

“We have since strengthened our process and systems to better manage these internal transfers,” he said on Twitter. 

A cold storage address is a type of wallet that is unplugged from the internet. It is considered the safest way to prevent digital currencies from being stolen or hacked. 

Mr. Marszalek said the company had worked with Gate.io to return the funds back to its cold storage. 

“It’s not looking good for these guys in general,” tweeted Adam Cochran, founder of venture-capital firm Cinneamhain Ventures, which invests in blockchain-related companies. 

After FTX’s troubles began last week, a number of cryptocurrency exchanges, including Crypto.com, promised to publish proof of their reserves in the spirit of transparency. The audited proofs allow users to check that their own assets are covered by an exchange’s reserves.

Write to Caitlin Ostroff at caitlin.ostroff@wsj.com and Elaine Yu at elaine.yu@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8



Read original article here

FTX bankruptcy is ‘somebody running a company that’s just dumb-as-f___ing greedy,’ says Mark Cuban

Billionaire Dallas Maverick’s owner Mark Cuban recently offered his perspective on the implosion of crypto platform FTX late this week.

‘That’s somebody running a company that’s just dumb-as-fucking greedy.’


— Mark Cuban

Cuban, speaking on Friday at a conference in Washington, D.C. hosted by Sports Business Journal, shared the view that avarice was at the root of the downfall of one-time crypto darling Sam Bankman-Fried, whose firm FTX Group just filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy.

“So what does Sam Bankman [Fried] do, he’s just–‘gimme more, gimme more, gimme more.’ So I’m gonna borrow money, loan it to an affiliated company and hope and pretend to myself that the FTT tokens that are in there on my balance sheet are gonna to sustain their value.”

Check out: Mark Cuban says buying metaverse real estate is ‘the dumbest shit ever

FTX’s collapse marks a stunning turnabout for a company, which was once valued at $26 billion, and whose founder, Bankman-Fried was viewed by many in the crypto industry as a venerable actor in the Wild West of digital exchanges.

On Thursday, the 30-year-old entrepreneur tweeted: “I f—ked up, and should have done better,” referencing the collapse of his exchange.

Embattled FTX, short billions of dollars, sought bankruptcy protection after the exchange experienced the crypto equivalent of a bank run. FTX, an affiliated hedge fund Alameda Research, and dozens of other related companies also filed a bankruptcy petition in Delaware on Friday morning. Boasting a nearly $16 billion fortune recently, Sam Bankman Fried’s net worth had all but evaporated in the wake of the FTX implosion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.

The price of FTX’s native token FTT went down about 88.8% over the past seven days to around $2.74, according to CoinMarketCap data.

The U.S. Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission are looking into the crypto exchange to determine whether any criminal activity or securities offenses were committed.

Regulators and are examining whether FTX used customer deposits to fund bets at Alameda Research, a no-no in traditional markets, according to reports.

Cuban, who is one of the stars of the investing show “Shark Tank” and owns the NBA’s Dallas Mavericks, is a big investor in crypto and blockchain-related platforms. According to a CNBC report, he has said that 80% of his investments that aren’t on Shark Tank are crypto-centric.

See: Tom Brady, Steph Curry and Kevin O’Leary set to lose big from FTX bankruptcy filing

For his part, Cuban is part of a class-action lawsuit accused of misleading investors into signing up for accounts with crypto platform Voyager Digital, which filed for bankruptcy in July. The suit alleges that Cuban touted his support for Voyager and referred to it “as close to risk-free as you’re gonna get in the crypto universe.”

Cuban mentioned Voyager in his Friday interview. Representatives for the billionaire investor didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Mavericks owner took to Twitter on Saturday to say that the crypto implosions “have been banking blowups. Lending to the wrong entity, misvaluations of collateral, arrogant arbs, followed by depositor runs.”

Cuban’s net worth is $4.6 billion, according to Forbes.



Read original article here

FTX Files for Bankruptcy, CEO Sam Bankman-Fried Resigns

Beleaguered cryptocurrency platform FTX filed for bankruptcy protection Friday, and Chief Executive

Sam Bankman-Fried

resigned.

FTX and a bevy of affiliates said they had more than 100,000 creditors and tens of billions of dollars in assets and liabilities. It is the largest crypto-related bankruptcy ever, and a demise remarkable for its swiftness as well as its size.

Just a week ago, FTX was an industry titan, and Mr. Bankman-Fried its smiling public face. In January, FTX raised money from Silicon Valley’s most sophisticated investors, at a valuation of $32 billion. A few weeks ago, Mr. Bankman-Fried was publicly musing about raising more, to get even bigger.

That is all gone. The bankruptcy will likely wipe out billions of equity value, leaving investors including Sequoia Capital and Thoma Bravo with stiff losses. It will maroon the crypto and cash deposits belonging to a legion of customers. FTX faces investigations or asset freezes from regulators and prosecutors around the world.

It has also rattled the crypto world. Crypto lender BlockFi, which had obtained a financial lifeline from FTX in July—one of several companies FTX had rescued earlier in the year—paused withdrawals Thursday evening.

Among the affiliates filing for bankruptcy protection is FTX US, a smaller unit that operated in the U.S. Most of FTX’s business was offshore. FTX and its affiliates filed in federal bankruptcy court in Delaware, where the U.S. unit is registered.

Thursday morning, Mr. Bankman-Fried said the troubles at FTX were confined to its international operations. He tweeted that FTX US “was not financially impacted” and that “every user could fully withdraw.” Later that day, FTX US said it might stop trading. On Friday, FTX US filed for bankruptcy along with the rest of FTX.

Bitcoin slipped after the announcement to trade near $16,500.

At issue in the bankruptcy proceedings and the investigations is to determine what happened to the billions that FTX raised, that its customers deposited, and that it earned from operating what appeared—for a time—to be a successful cryptocurrency exchange.

FTX in 2021 also paid $250 million—a quarter of its revenue that year—to a “related party” for software royalties, according to documents viewed by The Wall Street Journal.

Mr. Bankman-Fried wrote on Twitter roughly an hour after the bankruptcy announcement that he was “shocked to see things unravel the way they did earlier this week.”

FTX’s troubles began last weekend, after rival exchange Binance said it would sell its holdings of an FTX equity-like token—spooked by a CoinDesk report showed the depth of the relationship between FTX and Alameda.

John J. Ray

III has been named the new CEO of FTX Group, the company said. The bankruptcy filing includes FTX Trading Ltd., the company presiding over the global trading website FTX.com, and Alameda Research, a trading firm founded by Mr. Bankman-Fried, in addition to FTX US.

Mr. Ray was chairman of Enron Corp.’s successor company, Enron Creditors Recovery Corp., and oversaw the energy-trading company’s liquidation after it filed for bankruptcy in late 2001. The recovery rate for Enron creditors as of 2008 was about 52 cents on the dollar, the company said at the time. Mr. Ray’s successes included securing a $1.7 billion settlement with

Citigroup

in 2008. He had accused the bank of helping Enron mislead investors.

Other noteworthy bankruptcy cases in which Mr. Ray served in similar roles include Nortel Networks Inc., Fruit of the Loom and

Overseas Shipholding Group Inc.

In the petition, Mr. Bankman-Fried said that

Stephen Neal

would be appointed as the chairman of the board of FTX Group if he is willing to serve. He also said that he is being advised by the law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP.

FTX is the latest in a string of crypto companies seeking bankruptcy protection this year.



Photo:

Leon Neal/Getty Images

Bankruptcy means that it could be a long time before retail traders and others owed their funds are able to potentially recover any of them, if ever. Creditors to Mt. Gox, the Japanese crypto exchange that failed following a 2014 hack, are still waiting for their funds almost a decade later.

The collapse in digital-currency prices earlier this year triggered a rash of crypto-related bankruptcy filings, including Celsius Network LLC,

Voyager Digital Ltd.

and Three Arrows Capital.

Crypto investors may be confronted with an uphill battle to get their crypto deposits back in bankruptcy proceedings because their investments are likely to be treated as unsecured claims without collateral rights.

FTX’s bankruptcy also calls into question the fate of Voyager Digital. In September, the firm won the auction to buy the bankrupt lender’s assets with a purchase price of about $50 million, The Wall Street Journal has reported.

Voyager said Friday that the firm has reopened the bidding process for the company and is in active discussions with potential buyers. Voyager said it didn’t transfer any assets to FTX US, which previously submitted a $5 million good-faith deposit as part of the auction process. The funds are held in escrow, according to Voyager.

Voyager also recalled loans from Alameda Research for 6,500 bitcoin and 50,000 ether. The company currently has no loans outstanding with any borrower, it said. However, Voyager had about $3 million worth of cryptocurrencies stuck on FTX at the time of its bankruptcy filing.

contributed to this article.

Write to Caitlin Ostroff at caitlin.ostroff@wsj.com and Alexander Gladstone at alexander.gladstone@wsj.com

Corrections & Amplifications
Sam Bankman-Fried said he is being advised by the law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP. An earlier version of this article incorrectly said FTX was being advised by the law firm. (Corrected on Nov. 11)

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Russia Says It Will Rejoin Ukraine Grain-Export Deal

Russia said it would rejoin a deal allowing for the safe passage of Ukrainian grain, ending days of uncertainty over future shipments and feeding some criticism at home that Moscow had capitulated in the standoff.

Over the weekend, Russia suspended its involvement in an agreement with the United Nations and Turkey that was struck in July and allowed for the safe passage of grain exports from war-torn Ukrainian ports through the Black Sea to world markets. Russian authorities had said a maritime corridor used to facilitate the grain shipments had been used in an attack on Russia-occupied Crimea. Moscow threatened to board ships that left without its permission.

Russia’s Defense Ministry said early Wednesday it had received written guarantees from Kyiv that Ukraine wouldn’t use the corridor to attack Russian forces and that those were sufficient to rejoin the deal. President

Vladimir Putin

later Wednesday said that Russia reserved the right to pull out of the deal, but that it wouldn’t interfere in any future grain shipments from Ukraine directly to Turkey.

The justification provided by the Defense Ministry triggered derision in Moscow, where commentators have openly criticized Russia’s execution of the war in Ukraine. Senior military officials have at times drawn fire from pro-Kremlin military bloggers for losing ground to Ukraine’s army in recent months and for other moves these critics have called tactical or strategic mistakes. Russian officials have also had to defend themselves against criticism they have bungled a recent mobilization of reinforcements across the country.

“We trust Kyiv that the grain deal will not be used for military purposes. Brilliant,” wrote political commentator

Pavel Danilin,

director of the Center for Political Analysis, a pro-Kremlin Moscow-based think tank, questioning the logic of trusting Ukraine.

After Russia said over the weekend that it was suspending its participation in the deal, ships continued to pull in and out of Ukraine, navigating through a maritime corridor established to safeguard the trade. Moscow then threatened it would intercept ships that disembarked without permission, but Russia’s navy didn’t stop any vessels.

The relatively smooth operation, despite Russia’s suspension, was taken by some critics as a sign Moscow was powerless to upset the trade, even if it wanted to.

“The Kremlin itself simply fell into a trap from which it did not know how to get out,”

Tatiana Stanovaya,

founder of R.Politik, an independent political-analysis firm founded in Moscow, wrote on Telegram.

An oil refinery in Sicily, owned by Russia’s second largest oil and gas giant Lukoil, acts as a pass-through for Russian crude, which ultimately makes its way to the U.S. as gasoline and other refined oil products. Photo Illustration: Laura Kammermann

Among shipping and insurance executives, though, Russia’s suspension was threatening to dry up underwriting for voyages. Insurers were pulling policies and refusing to write new ones without Russia’s participation in the deal.

“You can’t get insurance with Russia out of the agreement,” said

Nikolas Tsakos,

president and chief executive of U.S.-listed, Greece-based Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd. Shipowners said insurers have resumed offering cover.

The grain standoff came as Russia faces setbacks on the battlefield and far from it. Ukrainian forces have taken back swaths of terrain that Russian forces had occupied in the early days of the invasion. Meanwhile, Russia’s economic leverage over Europe, in the form of its once-prodigious sales of natural gas, has recently waned—at least temporarily. European buyers have pivoted from Russian supplies, while Moscow cut back sharply on its sales to Europe.

Still, the continent has managed in recent months to sock away enough gas in storage that analysts believe will help it avoid the sort of shortages and rationings many Western officials just a few months ago had been bracing to endure. That new comfort could be short-lived, analysts say, if there is a colder-than-expected winter or infrastructure problems that further disrupt supplies.

Russia’s grain-deal suspension threatened to increase economic pressure on Ukraine, which relied on agriculture for about 10% of its gross domestic product before the war, Western and Ukrainian officials said. The Russian shutdown also imperiled food supplies for millions of people in poorer countries that import Ukrainian wheat.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine had bottled up those grain exports, sending global prices soaring. The U.N.-brokered deal moderated those prices, but also appeared to give Moscow outsize leverage on markets. As Mr. Putin threatened in recent weeks to leave the deal, Western officials accused him of using food as a weapon.

A U.N. official prepares to inspect in Istanbul a ship from Ukraine loaded with grain.



Photo:

yasin akgul/Agence France-Presse/Getty Images

Ismini Palla,

a spokeswoman for the U.N. at a coordination center in Istanbul that is charged with overseeing the deal, said Wednesday’s pause in shipping, which had been anticipated before Russia’s decision to rejoin the deal, was intended “to provide time for planning and discussions for the next movement of vessels.”

Ukraine shipped nearly 10 million tons of corn, wheat, sunflower oil and other products through the deal’s maritime corridor between August and October, helping to return the country’s exports to prewar levels. More than 100 large bulk ships are involved in the trade.

Russia stopped cooperating with the agreement after it accused Ukraine of using the corridor to attack Russian forces over the weekend. The U.N. said no military vessels are allowed to approach the corridor, which is closely monitored using satellite data.

In threatening to abandon the deal in recent months, Russia had complained that not enough of Ukraine’s grain was going to poor countries and said Western sanctions had slowed Russian food and fertilizer exports. U.S. and European Union officials say the sanctions don’t apply to food products. The U.N. said the measures have created obstacles to financing, insuring, shipping and paying for Russian products.

Russian shipping executives said vessel arrivals at Russian export ports had fallen by 20% over the past two months, with the majority of ships shifting to move Ukrainian cargoes.

U.N. Secretary-General

António Guterres

praised Russia’s renewed participation in the deal. Mr. Guterres “continues his engagement with all actors towards the renewal and full implementation of the Initiative, and he also remains committed to removing the remaining obstacles to the exports of Russian food and fertilizer,” his spokesman,

Stéphane Dujarric,

said.

Russia’s Defense Ministry said Wednesday that thanks to the U.N. and Turkey, “it was possible to obtain the necessary written guarantees from Ukraine” that it wouldn’t use the maritime corridor and Ukrainian ports for combat operations against Russia. Russia “considers that the guarantees received at the moment appear to be sufficient and resumes the implementation of the agreement,” it said.

Write to Jared Malsin at jared.malsin@wsj.com, Ann M. Simmons at ann.simmons@wsj.com and Costas Paris at costas.paris@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Russia Moves to Pull Out of Ukraine Grain Deal After Blasts Hit Crimean Port

Russia said Saturday that it would suspend participation in the export of agricultural products from Ukrainian ports, in response to an attack on the occupied Black Sea port of Sevastopol that it blamed on the government of Ukraine.

The Defense Ministry said in a statement published on Telegram that ships of the Black Sea Fleet and civilian ships involved in ensuring the security of the so-called grain corridor had come under attack. As a result, “the Russian side suspends participation in the implementation of agreements on the export of agricultural products from Ukrainian ports,” the statement said.

The move threatens to derail the United Nations brokered deal that unblocks Ukraine’s vital grain exports through the Black Sea, which is critical to addressing a global hunger crisis and comes a day after U.N. chief

António Guterres

urged Russia and Ukraine to renew the agreement, which is officially set to expire on Nov. 19.

Officials from Russia, Turkey, Ukraine and the U.N. signed the grain agreement in July, freeing millions of tons of food products that had been bottled up in the country since the Russian invasion began in February.

The agreement is one of the few diplomatic breakthroughs of the war and helped to bring the global price of wheat down to prewar levels, helping to ease a global hunger crisis that resulted in part from the conflict. Ukraine provided about 10% of the world’s wheat before Russia invaded.

If shipments of Ukrainian grain are halted, the suspension will likely drive up the global price of wheat, corn and other vital food products.

But Russia’s Foreign Ministry said that Ukraine’s armed forces used “the cover of a humanitarian corridor” to launch massive air and sea strikes and as a result Moscow “cannot guarantee the safety of civilian dry cargo ships participating in the Black Sea Initiative and suspends its implementation from today for an indefinite period.” It said appropriate instructions have been given to Russian representatives at the Joint Coordination Center in Istanbul, which controls the transportation of Ukrainian food.

A Turkish official said Turkey hasn’t been officially notified of Russia’s decision to suspend its participation in the deal. Turkish President Recep

Tayyip Erdogan

helped broker the deal.

Oleksandr Kubrakov,

Ukraine’s minister of infrastructure, said his country will continue supplying grains around the world. “The world should not be held hostage to Russia’s whims, hunger cannot be a weapon,” he said in a Tweet.

Russia’s decision to suspend it is also a major blow to Ukraine’s globally important agriculture industry, which returned to a nearly prewar level of grain exports earlier this month, largely due to the deal. Since the agreement was signed, Ukraine exported 9.2 million tons of food products through a safe corridor in the Black Sea, according to the United Nations.

Russian President

Vladimir Putin

has threatened to abandon the deal in recent months, arguing that not enough of Ukraine’s wheat was going to poorer nations and that not enough Russian food and fertilizers were being exported due to sanctions. Around one-quarter of the food shipped through the deal went to low-income countries, according to the U.N. Ukraine also has shipped wheat to crisis-stricken nations including Somalia, Afghanistan and Yemen under the agreement.

Stéphane Dujarric,

a spokesman for the U.N. secretary-general, on Saturday said, “We’ve seen the reports from the Russian Federation regarding the suspension of their participation in the Black Sea Grain Initiative following an attack on the Russian Black Sea Fleet. We are in touch with the Russian authorities on this matter.”

“It is vital that all parties refrain from any action that would imperil the Black Sea Grain Initiative which is a critical humanitarian effort that is clearly having a positive impact on access to food for millions of people around the world,” said Mr. Dujarric.

In Luch, a village near the Kherson front line, a resident plays with her dog in the basement where she has been living during the war.



Photo:

Virginie NGUYEN HOANG for the Wa

Volunteers distribute humanitarian aid in the village.



Photo:

Virginie NGUYEN HOANG for the Wa

When asked about how Russia’s decision would affect the operation of the grain corridor, a representative of the Joint Coordination Center referred to Mr. Dujarric’s statement.

Ukraine’s foreign minister said in a tweet, “We have warned of Russia’s plans to ruin the Black Sea Grain Initiative. Now Moscow uses a false pretext to block the grain corridor which ensures food security for millions of people. I call on all states to demand Russia to stop its hunger games and recommit to its obligations.”

A worker at a Ukrainian power plant repairs equipment damaged in a missile strike.



Photo:

sergei supinsky/Agence France-Presse/Getty Images

The remains of a house in the southern village of Luch, which has suffered frequent shelling.



Photo:

Virginie NGUYEN HOANG for the Wa

Ukraine President

Volodymyr Zelensky

accused Russia earlier this month of deliberately slowing the passage of vessels through the corridor, creating a backlog of more than 170 vessels waiting to transit. The corridor’s capacity is limited by the number of inspectors from Russia, Turkey, Ukraine and the U.N. who must check each ship as it enters and exits the Black Sea.

Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Lt. Gen. Igor Konashenkov said nine aerial drones and seven maritime drones were involved in Saturday’s attack. He said the air attacks were repelled, but a sea minesweeper, the Ivan Golubets, sustained minor damage, as did some defensive infrastructure in Yuzhnaya Bay, one of the harbor bays in Sevastopol.

“You could hear explosions coming in from the sea,” said Yevgeni Babalin, a dockworker at the Port of Sevastopol. “There are fears that the Admiral Makarov was hit by an underwater drone.They shot at it from the ship and from a helicopter.”

The Admiral Makarov, a frigate, replaced the Moskva as the Black Sea Fleet’s flagship after the latter was attacked earlier this year.

A broker in Odessa who arranges cargoes from Sevastopol to the Middle East said the situation at the port was tense with residents asked to stay inside by Russian authorities.

Mikhail Razvozhayev, the Russian-installed governor of Sevastopol, wrote on his Telegram messaging channel that the attack had caused minimal damage to civilian infrastructure but city services were put on alert. He appealed to residents of the city not to publicize videos or information of the attack that could aid Ukrainian forces “to understand how the defense of our city is built.”

Ukrainian officials haven’t claimed responsibility for previous blasts in Crimea, including a drone strike on the headquarters of the Black Sea Fleet in August, but rejoiced and vowed to reclaim the peninsula annexed by Russia in 2014.

Crimea has served as a rear base for Moscow’s military occupation of a swath of territory in southern Ukraine, where Kyiv’s forces are now seeking to dislodge Russian forces from part of the Kherson region.

Gen. Sergei Surovikin, the recently appointed commander of Russian troops in Ukraine, has acknowledged that the position in Kherson is challenging and that “difficult decisions” might be called for, without elaborating.

Russian-installed officials in Kherson began telling residents to leave the city earlier this month in what they said was preparation for a Ukrainian assault.

Kirill Stremousov,

deputy head of the Kherson region’s Russian-installed administration on Friday said the evacuation of civilians was complete.

Meanwhile, the Russian Defense Ministry spokesman accused the British Navy on Saturday of being responsible for sabotaging Nord Stream pipelines in late September. Western governments have found that explosions rocked Nord Stream and a parallel pair of pipelines, Nord Stream 2. Investigations are continuing. Some German officials have said they are working under the assumption that Russia was behind the blasts.

The U.K. Defense Ministry said in a tweet on Saturday: “To detract from their disastrous handling of the illegal invasion of Ukraine, the Russian Ministry of Defence is resorting to peddling false claims of an epic scale. This invented story, says more about arguments going on inside the Russian Government than it does about the west.”

Write to Ann M. Simmons at ann.simmons@wsj.com, Jared Malsin at jared.malsin@wsj.com and Isabel Coles at isabel.coles@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8



Read original article here