Tag Archives: bars

Getting Results—and Money—When Airlines Cancel Flights

Canceled or delayed flights can cost travelers money. Getting an airline to pay you back for expenses like hotel stays and rental cars isn’t impossible, but it can involve lots of legwork.

Southwest pledged to provide refunds to passengers on canceled or significantly delayed flights between Dec. 24 and Jan. 2, but the airline is also providing reimbursement for additional expenses including the cost of staying at a hotel or renting a car. Passengers were also given 25,000 frequent-flier points in a move by Southwest executives to win them back.

Airline passengers “have very few rights,” said

Paul Hudson,

president of FlyersRights, a consumer advocacy organization. Getting the remuneration that passengers believe they are entitled to can come down to perseverance and communicating extensively with the airline over an extended period.

Here’s what travelers need to know about their rights on domestic flights in the U.S. and how to get reimbursed.

My flight was canceled. Can I get a refund?

Airline customers are entitled to a refund if a flight is canceled for any reason or “significantly delayed” and they opt not to travel, according to rules from the Transportation Department. This policy extends to nonrefundable tickets. The DOT determines on a case-by-case basis whether passengers are entitled to a refund for a delayed flight.

While airlines are required to provide refunds in these circumstances if requested, they aren’t barred from offering other forms of redress first. Carriers will often offer a passenger the opportunity to rebook on another flight or a voucher or credit that could be used for future travel.

In these situations, customers will need to speak with an airline representative and request an “involuntary refund,” Mr. Hudson said. Not all customer-service staff will be familiar with this phrase, he warned, but he described it as “the magic words” to use to get a refund quickly.

I had to stay in a hotel because of a flight delay. Am I entitled to reimbursement?

Additional compensation beyond a refund of airfare and other fees isn’t required by the DOT. Still, most airlines have policies on what they will cover.

If a plane has a technical issue or the flight isn’t properly staffed, an airline’s compensation policy typically will kick in. If the delay or cancellation is due to weather, passengers may be out of luck getting assistance.

The DOT maintains a dashboard spelling out what is covered under the customer-service policies at the 10 largest domestic airlines in the U.S. in cases where cancellations or delays were under the carrier’s control. Each of these major airlines has put these policies in writing, making the commitments enforceable, a DOT spokeswoman said in an email.

My checked luggage went missing. What does the airline owe me?

If a checked bag is delayed, missing or damaged, the airline is liable and must reimburse the traveler. For domestic flights, airlines are only required to cover up to $3,800.

Apart from being required to reimburse passengers for the value of items that were lost or damaged, carriers must also compensate people for incidental expenses such as purchasing replacement clothing or medications. Airlines cannot set an arbitrary daily limit for those expenses, though they can require receipts or other proof for valuable items that were lost, according to the DOT.

I can’t rebook with my airline. Are they required to book me on another airline?

Before the airline industry was deregulated in the U.S. in the 1970s, carriers were required to rebook passengers with other airlines in instances where flights were canceled or delayed. “Now, it’s strictly voluntary,” said Mr. Hudson.

Some carriers have formal relationships with other airlines that allow them to rebook reservations at no additional cost, whereas others may buy tickets from competitors for stranded passengers. Southwest said it bought tickets on other airlines during its meltdown, and

Spirit

did the same during its 2021 meltdown.

I was bumped from my flight by my airline. Is that allowed?

Airlines have come under fire in recent years for the practice of overselling flights and then bumping passengers. The practice is allowed, as long as you haven’t boarded the plane. If you’ve already boarded, the airline can remove you from the flight for safety, security or health reasons.

If a passenger is involuntarily bumped, the carrier must provide a written statement of the flier’s rights and how the company decides who is bumped. They may be provided a refund, but they aren’t guaranteed additional compensation.

To be eligible for compensation, the traveler must have a confirmed reservation, have checked in on time and have arrived at the departure gate on time, the DOT states on its website.  

If all those conditions apply—and the airline cannot rebook the passenger on a flight that gets them to their destination within one hour of their original scheduled arrival—compensation is calculated based on the price of the original ticket, the length of the delay and whether the flight is domestic or international. Compensation ranges from up to $775 for short delays to no more than $1,550 for longer delays.

Write to Jacob Passy at jacob.passy@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Four foreign aid groups suspend work in Afghanistan after Taliban bars female employees



CNN
 — 

Four foreign aid groups said Sunday that they were moving to temporarily suspend their operations in Afghanistan after the Taliban barred female employees of non-governmental organizations from coming to work.

“We cannot effectively reach children, women and men in desperate need in Afghanistan without our female staff,” aid organizations Save the Children, Norwegian Refugee Council and CARE International said in a joint statement Sunday. Another international aid group, Afghanaid, made a similar announcement separately on Sunday.

“Without women driving our response, we would not have jointly reached millions of Afghans in need since August 2021. Beyond the impact on delivery of lifesaving assistance, this will affect thousands of jobs in the midst of an enormous economic crisis,” said the statement, which was signed by the heads of the three NGOs.

“Whilst we gain clarity on this announcement, we are suspending our programmes, demanding that men and women can equally continue our lifesaving assistance in Afghanistan,” the statement added.

The Taliban administration on Saturday ordered all local and international non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to stop their female employees from coming to work, according to a letter by the Ministry of Economy sent to all licensed NGOs. Non-compliance will result in the licenses of said NGOs being revoked, the ministry said.

David Wright, chief operating officer for Save the Children International, told CNN on Monday that the organization was unable to “reach tens of thousands of vulnerable mothers and children right across the country” because of the ban.

“We can’t get out to work because we need our female colleagues to help us get access to women and children. You can’t access young mothers or young children in education if you don’t have female staff, because it’s not appropriate in Afghanistan to have all-male staff dealing with young women or children,” he said.

In the letter, the ministry cites the nonobservance of Islamic dress rules and other laws and regulations as reasons for the decision.

“Lately there have been serious complaints regarding not observing the Islamic hijab and other Islamic Emirate’s laws and regulations,” the letter said, adding that as a result “guidance is given to suspend work of all female employees of national and international non-governmental organizations.”

The new restrictions mark yet another step in the Taliban’s brutal crackdown on the freedoms of Afghan women, following the hardline Islamist group’s takeover of the country in August 2021.

Although the Taliban have repeatedly claimed they will protect the rights of girls and women, they have in fact done the opposite, stripping away the hard-won freedoms for which women have fought tirelessly over the past two decades.

“The supreme leader is doing whatever he can… to make women as powerless as possible, even if there are other factions that say otherwise,” Afghan human rights activist Pashtana Durrani told CNN on Sunday, referring to Afghanistan’s Supreme Leader Alaiqadar Amirul Momineen.

“The Taliban don’t care. They want women to be as limited as possible, especially the supreme leader,” she added.

Earlier this week, the Taliban government suspended university education for all female students in Afghanistan.

In a televised news conference on Thursday, the Taliban’s higher education minister said they had banned women from universities for not observing Islamic dress rules and other “Islamic values,” citing female students traveling without a male guardian. The move sparked outrage among women in Afghanistan.

A group of women took to the streets in the city of Herat on Saturday to protest the university ban. Video footage circulating on social media showed Taliban officials using a water cannon to disperse the female protesters. Girls could be seen running from the water cannon and chanting “cowards” at officials.

Some of the Taliban’s most striking restrictions have been around education, with girls also barred from returning to secondary schools in March. The move devastated many students and their families, who described to CNN their dashed dreams of becoming doctors, teachers or engineers.

The United Nations on Saturday condemned the Taliban’s NGO announcement and said it would try to obtain a meeting with Taliban leadership to seek clarity.

“Women must be enabled to play a critical role in all aspects of life, including the humanitarian response. Banning women from work would violate the most fundamental rights of women, as well as be a clear breach of humanitarian principles,” the UN statement read. “This latest decision will only further hurt those most vulnerable, especially women and girls.”

UNICEF said the order was an “egregious rollback of rights for girls and women (that) will have sweeping consequences on the provision of health, nutrition and education services for children.”

Amnesty International called for the ban to “be reversed immediately” and for the Taliban to “stop misusing their power.”

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) said Sunday it was particularly concerned about the future of Afghanistan’s healthcare system and female patients.

The ICRC said that it supports 45 health structures in Afghanistan, including hospitals and medical schools. Among others, it pays the salaries of 10,483 health workers – 33% of whom are women.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken also condemned the move Saturday. “Deeply concerned that the Taliban’s ban on women delivering humanitarian aid in Afghanistan will disrupt vital and life-saving assistance to millions,” he wrote on Twitter. “Women are central to humanitarian operations around the world. This decision could be devastating for the Afghan people.”

Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said US officials should “not interfere in the internal issues of” Afghanistan.

“Those organizations operative in Afghanistan are obliged to comply with the laws and regulations of our country,” he tweeted Sunday, adding, “We do not permit anyone to state irresponsible words or make threats about the decisions or officials of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan under the title of humanitarian aid.”

Read original article here

Federal appeals court bars Biden administration from forcing Catholic groups to provide transgender care

A federal appeals court on Friday permanently blocked the Biden administration from requiring religious doctors and hospitals to perform transgender medical services that violate their conscience, becoming the second court to do so. 

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed a lower court ruling in favor of the plaintiffs in Sisters of Mercy v. Becerra, a case concerning a coalition of Catholic groups who have challenged the Biden administration’s attempt to invoke the Affordable Care Act to prohibit doctors and hospitals from discriminating against transgender patients. The Catholic groups, which include hospitals, a university and nuns who run health clinics, say the Biden administration’s rule violates their free exercise of religion. 

An August ruling from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals similarly held that the federal government cannot force Christian medical organizations to perform abortions or gender transition surgeries under the Affordable Care Act.

US GOVERNMENT CAN’T FORCE CHRISTIAN GROUPS TO PERFORM ABORTIONS, GENDER REASSIGNMENT SURGERY, COURT RULES

Xavier Becerra, secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), speaks during a news conference at the HHS headquarters in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, June 28, 2022. Under the White House’s direction, Becerra unveiled an action plan in response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. 
(Amanda Andrade-Rhoades/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

In 2016, the Department of Health and Human Services promulgated a rule implementing the probation of discrimination under Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act, also called Obamacare. The rule prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in all health programs and requires doctors and hospitals who receive funding from HHS (including hospitals that accept Medicare or doctors who accept Medicaid) to treat individuals consistent with their gender identity. 

Any doctor or hospital who violates the rule could face severe financial penalties.

MULTIPLE STATES CRACK DOWN ON TRANSGENDER TREATMENT FOR MINORS AMID GROWING LEGAL DEBATE

People hold signs during a joint board meeting of the Florida Board of Medicine and the Florida Board of Osteopathic Medicine gather to establish new guidelines limiting gender-affirming care in Florida, on Nov. 4, 2022.
(Ricardo Ramirez Buxeda/Orlando Sentinel/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)

Catholic employers sued, arguing that the government’s mandate “forces doctors to perform controversial and sometimes harmful medical procedures” and violates their religious conscience. The lawsuit was joined by the state of North Dakota and the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which is representing the plaintiffs, Sisters of Mercy, the University of Mary and SMP Health System. 

On January 21, 2021, U.S. District Court Judge Peter D. Welte ruled in favor of the Catholic groups, blocking the transgender rule from taking effect. Welte, a Trump appointee, also blocked the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) from requiring the Catholic employers to provide insurance coverage for sex-change surgeries or cross-hormone therapies. 

AMERICAN GIRL ACCUSED OF ‘GASLIGHTING CHILDREN’ WITH BOOK ABOUT GENDER IDENTITY, TRANSITIONING

Demonstrators protest in support of rights for transgender youth.
(Fox News )

The Biden administration appealed to the Eighth Circuit, but a three-judge panel of Republican appointees upheld the lower court’s ruling that “intrusion upon the Catholic Plaintiffs’ exercise of religion is sufficient to show irreparable harm.” 

“The federal government has no business forcing doctors to violate their consciences or perform controversial procedures that could permanently harm their patients,” said Luke Goodrich, vice president and senior counsel at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“This is a common-sense ruling that protects patients, aligns with best medical practice and ensures doctors can follow their Hippocratic Oath to ‘do no harm,'” he added.

The Biden administration may next ask the full Eighth Circuit to rehear the case or make an appeal to the Supreme Court. 

Read original article here

Dwayne Johnson buys up Snickers bars at Hawaii 7-Eleven location to make up for past shoplifting

Dwayne Johnson buys up supply of Snickers bars at Hawaii 7-Eleven location to make up for shoplifting them when he was younger

  • Johnson, 50, visited convenience store to right a past wrong 
  • He said he shoplifted Snickers bars everyday for a year 
  • Actor paid for store’s Snickers inventory and other customers’ tabs 

Dwayne Johnson is making up for past missteps.

The 50-year-old superstar on Monday took to Instagram to document a visit to a 7-Eleven store in Hawaii where he used to shoplift at as a teenager – this time buying out the store’s Snickers inventory while picking up the tabs for surprised and starstruck customers.

The wrestler-turned-actor said in the caption of the post that when he was 14, he had routinely swiped a king-size Snickers ‘EVERY DAY from 7-11 for almost a year’ as he headed to work out at the gym.

The latest: Dwayne Johnson, 50, on Monday took to Instagram to document a visit to a 7-Eleven store in Hawaii where he used to shoplift at as a teenager – this time buying out the store’s Snickers inventory while picking up the tabs for surprised and starstruck customers

‘The same clerk was there every day and always just turned her head and never busted me,’ the Black Adam star explained. 

He continued: ‘I’ve exercised a few big demons over the years. I know this one seems VERY SILLY, but every time I come back home to Hawaii and drive by 7-11…I always knew I needed to go in and clean out every Snickers bar they had – the right way.’

Johnson said that ‘it was a lot of fun to take care of everybody who walked into 7-11 while I was there,’ as it was the least he ‘could do considering all the s*** [he] used to steal from here.’

He said that the timeframe was around when his family was evicted from their home in Hawaii amid financial troubles.

The actor smiled as he cleared out the store’s Snickers inventory 

The Black Adam actor laid dozens of Snickers bars out on the counter 

Johnson picked up a tab in the $300 range including the Snickers and tabs for customers 

Johnson reflected on his past mistakes, saying, ‘We can’t change the past and some of the dumb stuff we may have done, but every once in a while we can add a little redeeming grace note to that situation – and maybe put a big smile on some stranger’s faces.’

In the accompanying clip, Johnson was seen in a black tank top with his Brahma Bull logo and black shorts, with black sneakers and sunglasses.

He walked in the convenience store and purchased around $300 in Snickers and other items for customers. He also tipped the employees for processing the massive purchase.

He told the clerk, ‘Thank you so much. I appreciate you. If somebody looks like they’re stealing Snickers, give them these so they don’t steal them.’

In the accompanying clip, Johnson was seen in a black tank top with his Brahma Bull logo and black shorts, with black sneakers and sunglasses

Johnson posed with the employees at the convenience store 

Read original article here

Apple, Amazon, McDonald’s Headline Busy Earnings Week

Amazon.

com Inc.,

Apple Inc.

and

Meta Platforms Inc.

are among the tech heavyweights featured in a packed week of earnings that investors will probe for indicators about the broader economy.

Other tech companies scheduled to report their latest quarterly reports include Google parent company

Alphabet Inc.

and

Microsoft Corp.

Investors also will hear from airlines such as

Southwest Airlines Co.

and

JetBlue Airways Corp.

, automotive companies

General Motors Co.

and

Ford Motor Co.

, and energy giants

Chevron Corp.

and

Exxon

Mobil Corp.

Nearly a third of the S&P 500, or 161 companies, are slated to report earnings in the coming week, according to FactSet. Twelve bellwethers from the Dow Jones Industrial Average, including

Boeing Co.

and

McDonald’s

Corp., are expected to report as well.

The flurry of results from a broad set of companies will give a sense of how businesses are faring as they deal with inflation denting consumer spending, ongoing supply-chain challenges and a stronger dollar.

People awaited the release of Apple’s latest iPhones in New York last month. The company will report quarterly results on Thursday afternoon.



Photo:

ANDREW KELLY/REUTERS

One area holding up to the challenges has been travel. Several airline companies have reported that consumers still have an appetite to spend on trips and vacations. On Friday,

American Express Co.

raised its outlook for the year in part because of a surge in travel spending.

“We expected the recovery in travel spending to be a tailwind for us, but the strength of the rebound has exceeded our expectations throughout the year,” American Express Chief Executive

Stephen Squeri

said.

In addition to airlines reporting, companies such as car-rental company

Hertz Global Holdings Inc.

and lodging companies

Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.

and

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Inc.

will offer reads into leisure spending.

Overall, earnings for the S&P 500 companies are on track to rise 1.5% this period compared with a year ago, while revenue is projected to grow 8.5%, FactSet said.

Other companies will serve as a gauge for how consumers have responded to higher prices and whether they have altered their spending as a result.

Coca-Cola Co.

and

Kimberly-Clark Corp.

on Tuesday and

Kraft Heinz Co.

on Wednesday will show how consumers are digesting higher prices.

Mattel Inc.,

set to report on Tuesday, will highlight whether demand for toys remains resilient. Rival

Hasbro Inc.

issued a warning ahead of the holiday season.

United Parcel Service Inc.

will release its results on Tuesday and provide an opportunity to show how it is faring ahead of the busy shipping season. The Atlanta-based carrier’s earnings come weeks after rival

FedEx Corp.

warned of a looming global recession and outlined plans to raise shipping rates across most of its services in January to contend with a global slowdown in business.

Results from credit-card companies

Visa Inc.

and

Mastercard Inc.

will offer insights into whether inflation has finally put a dent in consumer spending after both companies reported resilient numbers last quarter.

Wireless carrier

T-Mobile US Inc.’s

numbers on Thursday will give more context to mixed results from competitors

Verizon Communications Inc.

and

AT&T Inc.

AT&T

issued an upbeat outlook on Thursday after its core wireless business exceeded the company’s expectations, whereas Verizon on Friday said earnings tumbled as retail customers balked at recent price increases.

Other notable companies lined up to report include

Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.

on Tuesday, chicken giant

Pilgrim’s Pride Corp.

on Wednesday and chip maker

Intel Corp.

on Thursday.

Write to Denny Jacob at denny.jacob@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Uvalde school shooting: Texas state trooper who was among the first to respond to school massacre has been fired, official says



CNN
 — 

Sgt. Juan Maldonado, a Texas state trooper who was among the first to respond to the Uvalde mass school shooting in May, has been fired from the state Department of Public Safety, spokesperson Ericka Miller told CNN on Friday.

The public safety department did not disclose the grounds for termination.

CNN has requested additional details from the department regarding their termination process, including timeframe and potential appeal process. CNN has also reached out to Maldonado for comment.

Maldonado’s ousting comes after public outcry and condemnation over the extreme delay in law enforcement response to the shooting at Robb Elementary, where a teenage gunman entered adjoining classrooms on May 24 and opened fire.

The shooter killed 19 students and two teachers and wounded others, while dozens of officers arriving on scene failed to immediately take down the gunman.

In early August, CNN was the first to report Maldonado was seen on body camera video arriving 4 minutes and 51 seconds after the gunman began his massacre, which became the deadliest school shooting in the US since 2012.

A total of 376 law enforcement officers would arrive on the scene, yet it took 77 minutes from the onset of the attack before the gunman was shot and killed by authorities, according to a Texas House investigative committee. Some 91 Department of Public Safety officers were among those on scene.

In August, DPS Director Col. Steven McCraw announced an internal review of every DPS officer who responded to the shooting. Seven officers were subsequently referred to the inspector general for further investigation. Their names were not publicly released.

CNN identified one of the officers being investigated as Capt. Joel Betancourt, who issued an order to delay the breach of the classrooms even as a Border Patrol Tactical Unit was entering and stopping the gunman. As of Thursday, Betancourt remained on active duty. DPS declined to comment on Betancourt when asked by CNN Friday.

Another DPS officer under scrutiny was Crimson Elizondo, who left the department and was later hired as a police officer for the Uvalde Consolidated Independent School District. She was fired from that position after CNN reported what she did and said at Robb Elementary on the day of the massacre during the response.

McCraw told CNN in September no officer would get a pass, adding he would also take responsibility if needed.

“I’ll be the first to resign, I’ll gladly resign, I’ll tender my resignation to the governor if I think there is any culpability in the Department of Public Safety. Period,” he said.

CNN is in a coalition of news organizations suing the DPS for records relating to the investigations that have been withheld from the media and public.

As the fallout continues following law enforcement’s botched response to the massacre at Robb Elementary, families of the victims have been demanding greater accountability from officials.

The school board in August fired Pete Arredondo, who was the Uvalde school district police chief at the time of the shooting. State officials identified Arredondo as the on-scene police commander, though he has said he did not consider himself in charge.

At the time, DPS director McCraw blamed Arredondo for officers’ failure to confront the shooter, adding that the commander was “the only thing” that stopped officers. Local officials criticized McCraw and DPS for a lack of transparency regarding their investigation.

Further, some parents also called for the removal of Hal Harrell, who served as the superintendent for the Uvalde school district. Harrell formally retired this week.

“I am truly grateful for your support and well wishes. My decision to retire has not been made lightly and was made after much prayer and discernment,” he said in a social media post dated October 10. “My heart was broken on May 24th and I will always pray for each precious life that was tragically taken as well as their families.”

Harrell’s retirement came months after a Texas state House committee that investigated the response found the school did not comply with safety policies. The committee’s report also said the school failed to adequately prepare for the risk of an armed intruder and the common practice of leaving doors unlocked.

Before retiring, Harrell announced safety measures, including the addition of at least 33 officers, 500 cameras as well as the installation of fences around campuses.

The district has since suspended its police force operations and placed a lieutenant and another top school official on leave as part of its investigation.

Read original article here

California Fast Food Wages Would Be Set by Government Under Bill Passed by State Legislature

California’s Legislature passed a bill Monday to create a government panel that would set wages for an estimated half-million fast food workers in the state, a first-in-the-U.S. approach to workplace regulation that labor union backers hope will spread nationally.

The bill, known as the Fast Act, would establish a panel with members appointed by the governor and legislative leaders composed of workers, union representatives, employers and business advocates. They would set hourly wages of up to $22 for fast food workers starting next year and can increase them annually by the same rate as the consumer-price index, up to a maximum of 3.5%.

A previous version of the bill passed by the state Assembly in January also allowed the council to oversee workplace conditions such as scheduling and made restaurant chains joint employers of their franchise’s employers, potentially opening them to liability for labor violations.

Representatives for companies including

McDonald’s Corp.

,

Yum Brands Inc.

and

Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.

succeeded in having those provisions removed in the state Senate via amendments over the past week, though they still oppose the bill.

“This is the biggest lobbying fight that the franchise sector has ever been in,” said

Matthew Haller,

president of the International Franchise Association, a trade group whose members own many fast food restaurants.

A University of California, Riverside School of Business study commissioned by the franchisee association found that setting minimum wages between $22 and $43 would generate a 60% increase in labor costs and raise fast-food prices by about 20%.

California’s current minimum wage is $15 and is set to increase by 50 cents on Jan. 1.

The final version of the Fast Act passed both houses of the Democratic-controlled state Legislature on Monday. In both the Assembly and the Senate, all of the “yes” votes came from Democrats and every Republican who voted opposed the bill.

Democratic Gov.

Gavin Newsom

now has until Sept. 30 to decide whether to sign or veto the bill.

Mr. Newsom hasn’t taken a public stance on the current version of the bill, but his Department of Finance opposed the original version.

Labor unions backing the measure have long struggled to organize fast food workers, in part because the industry’s franchise model means there are so many different employers.

California lawmakers first floated the bill last year, with proponents arguing that tighter regulations were needed to protect fast food workers, who are overwhelmingly Black or Latino and who they say experience unpaid overtime and other labor violations.

The average U.S. home earned more last year than the average American worker. Prices for homes, groceries and gas are rising faster than Americans’ wages and that may be why sentiment and confidence have been so low recently. WSJ’s Dion Rabouin explains. Photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Despite the recent changes, proponents said the bill is still a significant step forward. Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher, a former Democratic legislator who introduced the bill when she was in the Assembly, said it moves California closer to a labor model used in Europe where unions negotiate for wages and work conditions in an entire sector, rather than company-by-company.

“It’s still a big bold idea. And just the notion of giving workers a voice at the table will be fundamentally different for those workers,” said Ms. Gonzalez Fletcher, who now leads the California Labor Federation, the state’s largest union umbrella group.

The recent amendments call for the council to shut down in 2028 unless it is renewed, though inflation-adjusted wage increases for workers would continue.

The bill covers fast food restaurants that are part of a chain, that have limited or no table service and where customers order their food and pay before eating. The chain must have 100 or more locations nationally, up from 30 in a previous bill version.

California accounts for around 14% of total U.S. restaurant sales, and policy in the state tends to affect the rest of the sector, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. analysts wrote in a client note earlier this month.

Service Employees International Union President

Mary Kay Henry

said she hoped the bill would be a catalyst for similar movements across the country.

Investors have begun to ask about the act’s potential implications for restaurant chains at a time when companies are struggling with high food and labor costs, Wall Street analysts said.

“Obviously, we think it’s problematic on many, many fronts,” said

Paul Brown,

chief executive of Dunkin’ and Arby’s owner Inspire Brands Inc., in an interview. “I think it’s actually trying to solve a problem that doesn’t exist.”

Chipotle, Yum Brands, Chick-fil-A Inc., In-N-Out Burgers,

Jack in the Box Inc.,

and Burger King parent

Restaurant Brands International Inc.

have together spent more than $1 million to lobby lawmakers between 2021 and June 30 of this year, primarily on the Fast Act, state records show.

The International Franchise Association, which represents some 1,200 franchise brands, has spent $615,000 lobbying against the Fast Act and other legislation in that time.

Disclosures for lobbying spending since July 1 aren’t due until later this year, but industry advocacy against the bill has ramped up considerably during that time, people familiar with the effort said.

Labor unions have collectively spent more than $5 million to lobby the Legislature since the beginning of 2021, mostly on the Fast Act, state records show.

McDonald’s has encouraged franchisees around the country to email California lawmakers urging them to vote against the bill, according to a message viewed by The Wall Street Journal.

State Sen. Shannon Grove, a Republican, said on the Senate floor Monday that McDonald’s representatives told her that if the Fast Act becomes law, the company could stop expanding in California or leave altogether.

“Could we really survive without the golden arches?” Ms. Grove said.

Write to Heather Haddon at heather.haddon@wsj.com and Christine Mai-Duc at christine.maiduc@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Some Dallas restaurants and bars ‘got rocked’ by flash flooding Monday

As parts of Dallas were slammed with flash flooding Monday morning, restaurants and bars in hard-hit areas such as Deep Ellum, downtown and East Dallas were assessing the damage.

Joel Morales, who runs The Peak Inn in East Dallas as well as Adair’s Saloon in Deep Ellum, said Peak Inn “got rocked,” with 3 inches of water in the building from front to back. Morales hopes not to close at all, “but possibly a day,” he said.

Adair’s was fine, he said, but it was dicey for a while. “If it rains medium hard, it typically comes in the down slope at the back door. But we also have a sump pump and sand bags, so that was covered. A little water started to come in the front door, which I have only seen twice in 20-plus years.”

Tracy Miller, chef-owner at Local restaurant on Elm Street, said the front entrance of the eatery was flooded Monday morning. The water receded quickly, but leaves and dirt still scattered the front dining room hardwood floor.

In Expo Park, Shad Kvetko of bar Las Almas Rotas said he and his business partner were assessing flood damage. Some water got in but not enough to close the restaurant.

But nearby, the dining room at Tarantino’s Cicchetti Bar and Record Lounge on Parry Avenue got about 6 inches of water, but it had all receded by about 10 a.m., said owner Peter Tarantino.

Tarantino said he’ll have to replace all the rugs and carpets in the lounge area and that a few records got damaged, but the furniture might be salvageable. “I’m hoping by Thursday we’ll be able to open up the bar with a few snacks,” he said. “I don’t give up too easily.”

He adds that the infrastructure in the area needs some work and the buildings are old. Tarantino lives in an apartment nearby and said he couldn’t leave by foot initially. “Exposition Avenue turned into a river,” he said. “I couldn’t get out of my apartment. I looked out the window, and it was just a river flowing. Same thing on Parry Avenue.”

Tarantino has been through a “roller coaster” since he signed a lease for the restaurant in 2019, he said. He delayed opening in 2020 because of the pandemic, finally opening in 2021. Then the restaurant was hit by plumbing issues, labor issues, staff members getting ill with COVID-19 and inflation. The restaurant recently had closed temporarily because construction at the Music Hall at Fair Park led to less dinner business.

“I’m trying to get my doors back open, and then this happens. It’s just one monster after another,” Tarantino said. “The restaurant industry needs a break. I’ve seen more mayhem in the last two years than I have in my whole life.”

On Cedar Springs Road, Alexandre’s Bar declared an “inclement weather emergency.” An Instagram post stated: “With entry into Oak Lawn impassable, only local workers are allowed to work today if safe. This means our kitchen will not be open today. We will keep an eye on the ongoing weather situation and keep you updated. Please do not drive unless you have to and never cross moving or even small inches of water on the roadway.”

In Oak Cliff, Xaman Cafe posted a video on Instagram of employees sweeping water off the floor and out the front door and said it would be “closing until further notice” and waiting for the rain to subside.

Freelance writer Amanda Albee contributed to this report.



Read original article here

Driver who killed Nicki Minaj’s father in accident is sentenced to spend just ONE year behind bars

Charles Polevich, 71, (pictured) was sentenced to one year behind bars on Wednesday for killing Nicki Minaj’s father Robert Maraj, 64, in February 2021 car accident on Long Island 

The driver who killed Nicki Minaj’s father in a hit-and-run accident has been sentenced to one year behind bars and his license suspended for six months. 

Charles Polevich, 71, was sentenced on Wednesday after pleading guilty to leaving a scene of an accident and tampering with physical evidence – both felonies – after killing Robert Maraj, 64, in February 2021 car accident on Long Island.

He has also been ordered to pay a $5,000 fine. 

The older man originally faced up to seven years, but the judge promised he wouldn’t sentence him for more than a year, according to TMZ. 

The victim’s widow, Carol, told reporters she was ‘not happy’ with the planned sentence at the time. The widow, who is suing Polevich for $150million, said seeing him in court left her shaking at the memory of her husband fighting for his life in the hospital.

Prosecutors, who sought a one-to-three-year prison sentence, also took issue with the planned penalty. 

Maraj had been walking on Long Island when Polevich hit him. He initially got out of his car and looked at the injured man on the ground, but then drove off, didn’t call 911, garaged his car and covered it with a tarp, authorities said.

The singer’s father was taken to the hospital in critical condition and died the next day. 

Polevich (pictured on Wednesday) was also ordered to pay a $5,000 fine and will have his license suspended after he attempted to hide his vehicle after the accident 

Carol Maraj (left, with husband, Robert, in 2013) told reporters she was ‘not happy’ with the planned sentence. The widow is suing Polevich for $150million

Polevich’s lawyer, Marc Gann, previously called the hit-and-run ‘completely out of character’ for his client, who hails from Long Island, but has a drilling and water purification business in Guam.

‘He does feel tremendous empathy for Mr. Maraj’s family and tremendous remorse for any role he played in his death,’ Gann said by phone after court. He suggested that Polevich might have had a medical problem that made him not ‘fully aware of what he was doing,’ while noting that it wasn’t a legal justification.

Polevich, who spent a lot of time in Guam but has a home in Mineola, initially got out of his car, observed Maraj lying on the ground, then got back behind the wheel and drove to his home, where he then parked his Volvo in the garage and covered it up, according to police.

The Grammy award winner – who is best known for her songs Super Bass and Anaconda – had previously commented on her father’s death, writing that it was ‘the most devastating loss of my life’ on her website last year.  

In interviews years ago, she described a troubled relationship with her father. But she later said he had changed.

After his death, she wrote about wishing she could pick up the phone and talk to him.

Nicki said losing her father was ‘the most devastating loss of my life’

‘He was very loved & will be very missed,’ she wrote.

Detectives used surveillance video from the neighborhood to track the vehicle involved in the hit-and-run crash to Polevich’s home in the 160 block of Roselle Street in Mineola.

Officers then offered Polevich the opportunity to surrender at police headquarters.

He was charged with leaving the scene of an auto accident and tampering with evidence.

Police said that had Polevich stayed at the scene and was not under the influence of drugs or alcohol at the time, he would have avoided criminal charges.

Read original article here

Stocks Rise on Services Data, Earnings

U.S. stocks rose Wednesday as investors considered another wave of corporate earnings reports and after a key reading on the services sector hit a three-month high.

The S&P 500 rose 1.1%, recouping losses after it fell Tuesday. The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 0.9%. The Nasdaq Composite gained 1.8%. 

Stocks had come under renewed pressure in recent days from geopolitical tensions, as U.S. House Speaker

Nancy Pelosi

met with Taiwan’s president despite warnings from China. Meanwhile, Federal Reserve officials said the central bank is likely to continue raising interest rates at coming meetings, dampening hopes in markets that slowing economic growth could mean a change in policy.

But some better-than-expected earnings reports amid low liquidity in August are lifting sentiment, investors say.

“Markets are taking a bit of a breather to assess what’s going on globally. There is still a lot of inflation, central banks are keeping that hawkish rhetoric and we get some geopolitics on top of that,” said Olivier Marciot, global macro portfolio manager at Unigestion. But earnings have been pretty good, in terms of beating expectations, he added.

The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note rose to 2.805% from 2.740% Tuesday. Weak economic data have weighed on yields in recent days, according to Michael Hewson, markets analyst at CMC Markets. There are “raised concerns that the U.S. economy could well be slowing sharply,” he said.

There have been concerns about the pace of the economy, and even whether a new recession is coming, but the U.S. services sector continued to expand in July, according to a report from the Institute for Supply Management. The ISM’s index of conditions for businesses like restaurants, hotels and retailers hit a three-month high in July.

The broader problem for investors is that whether or not the economy is technically in recession, inflation and the pressure it puts on the Fed to raise rates is resulting in an environment for investors that is fundamentally different from anything they have seen over the past several decades, said Eaton Vance portfolio manager Aaron Dunn. That won’t end soon, he said.

There has been a bounce back recently in some of the more beaten-up stocks, he said, but those hoping the growth trade returns may be disappointed. “Equities returns are going to be a grind.”

In corporate news,

PayPal

shares jumped 10% after hedge fund Elliott Management confirmed it has a $2 billion stake in the payments company. Starbucks rose 2.7% after it said demand is still strong and raising prices partially offset higher labor costs.

Vaccine maker

Moderna

rose 16% after it posted earnings above analysts’ estimates and said it would begin a new $3 billion share repurchase program.

Airbnb

declined 4.7% after it said it swung back to profit but its outlook disappointed investors. Online dating group

Match

tumbled 17% after posting results that missed estimates and said the CEO of Tinder is leaving the firm. 

Chip maker

Advanced Micro Devices

fell 3% after it reported a drop in profit and issued guidance for the current period that came below Wall Street’s expectations. 

Clorox,

MGM Resorts,

and insurers

MetLife

and

Allstate

are scheduled to report earnings after markets close.

Oil prices fell after an OPEC+ meeting where a committee suggested a smaller-than-expected production increase, according to delegates. U.S. crude fell 2.5% to $92.10.

Traders worked on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange on Tuesday.



Photo:

ANDREW KELLY/REUTERS

Overseas, the pan-continental Stoxx Europe 600 ticked up 0.4%. British-listed cybersecurity firm

Avast

soared 43% after a U.K. regulator said it has provisionally cleared

NortonLifeLock’s

$7.3 billion acquisition of the company. French

bank Société Générale

rose 2.9% after reporting a narrower loss than analysts expected, despite its exit from Russia.

In Asia, major benchmarks were mixed. The Shanghai Composite Index ticked down 0.7%, extending losses after it closed down 2.3% on Tuesday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng added 0.4% and Japan’s Nikkei 225 rose 0.5%.

Write to Anna Hirtenstein at anna.hirtenstein@wsj.com

We want to hear from you

By submitting your response to this questionnaire, you consent to Dow Jones processing your special categories of personal information and are indicating that your answers may be investigated and published by The Wall Street Journal and you are willing to be contacted by a Journal reporter to discuss your answers further. In an article on this subject, the Journal will not attribute your answers to you by name unless a reporter contacts you and you provide that consent.

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here