Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka, K. et al. Asgard archaea illuminate the origin of eukaryotic cellular complexity. Nature 541, 353–358 (2017).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y. et al. Expanded diversity of Asgard archaea and their relationships with eukaryotes. Nature 593, 553–557 (2021).
Google Scholar
Eme, L., Spang, A., Lombard, J., Stairs, C. W. & Ettema, T. J. G. Archaea and the origin of eukaryotes. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15, 711–723 (2017).
Google Scholar
Stairs, C. W. & Ettema, T. J. G. The archaeal roots of the eukaryotic dynamic actin cytoskeleton. Curr. Biol. 30, R521–R526 (2020).
Google Scholar
Akıl, C. et al. Mythical origins of the actin cytoskeleton. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 68, 55–63 (2021).
Google Scholar
Nobs, S. J., MacLeod, F. I., Wong, H. L. & Burns, B. P. Eukarya the chimera: eukaryotes, a secondary innovation of the two domains of life? Trends Microbiol. 30, 421–431 (2022).
Google Scholar
Imachi, H. et al. Isolation of an archaeon at the prokaryote-eukaryote interface. Nature 577, 519–525 (2020).
Google Scholar
Huet, J., Schnabel, R., Sentenac, A. & Zillig, W. Archaebacteria and eukaryotes possess DNA-dependent RNA polymerases of a common type. EMBO J. 2, 1291–1294 (1983).
Google Scholar
Iwabe, N., Kuma, K., Hasegawa, M., Osawa, S. & Miytata, T. Evolutionary relationship of archaebacteria, eubacteria, and eukaryotes inferred from phylogenetic trees of duplicated genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 9355–9359 (1989).
Google Scholar
Spang, A. et al. Complex archaea that bridge the gap between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Nature 521, 173–179 (2015).
Google Scholar
Sun, J. et al. Recoding of stop codons expands the metabolic potential of two novel Asgardarchaeota lineages. ISME Commun. 1, 30 (2021).
Google Scholar
Seitz, K. W., Lazar, C. S., Hinrichs, K. U., Teske, A. P. & Baker, B. J. Genomic reconstruction of a novel, deeply branched sediment archaeal phylum with pathways for acetogenesis and sulfur reduction. ISME J. 10, 1696–1705 (2016).
Google Scholar
Seitz, K. W. et al. Asgard archaea capable of anaerobic hydrocarbon cycling. Nat. Commun. 10, 1822 (2019).
Google Scholar
Cai, M. et al. Diverse Asgard archaea including the novel phylum Gerdarchaeota participate in organic matter degradation. Sci. China Life Sci. 63, 886–897 (2020).
Google Scholar
Farag, I. F., Zhao, R. & Biddle, J. F. “Sifarchaeota,” a novel Asgard phylum from Costa Rican sediment capable of polysaccharide degradation and anaerobic methylotrophy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 87, e02584-20 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. W. et al. Newly discovered Asgard archaea Hermodarchaeota potentially degrade alkanes and aromatics via alkyl/benzyl-succinate synthase and benzoyl-CoA pathway. ISME J. 15, 1826–1843 (2021).
Google Scholar
Xie, R. et al. Expanding Asgard members in the domain of Archaea sheds new light on the origin of eukaryotes. Sci. China Life Sci. 65, 818–829 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bulzu, P.-A. et al. Casting light on Asgardarchaeota metabolism in a sunlit microoxic niche. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 1129–1137 (2019).
Google Scholar
Akıl, C. et al. Insights into the evolution of regulated actin dynamics via characterization of primitive gelsolin/cofilin proteins from Asgard archaea. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 19904–19913 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lu, Z. et al. Coevolution of eukaryote-like Vps4 and ESCRT-III subunits in the Asgard archaea. Ecol. Evol. Sci. 11, e00417-20 (2020).
Hatano, T. et al. Asgard archaea shed light on the evolutionary origins of the eukaryotic ubiquitin-ESCRT machinery. Nat. Commun. 13, 3398 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ettema, T. J. G., Lindås, A. C. & Bernander, R. An actin-based cytoskeleton in archaea. Mol. Microbiol. 80, 1052–1061 (2011).
Google Scholar
Izoré, T., Kureisaite-Ciziene, D., McLaughlin, S. H. & Löwe, J. Crenactin forms actin-like double helical filaments regulated by arcadin-2. eLife 5, e21600 (2016).
Google Scholar
Akıl, C. & Robinson, R. C. Genomes of Asgard archaea encode profilins that regulate actin. Nature 562, 439–443 (2018).
Google Scholar
Survery, S. et al. Heimdallarchaea encodes profilin with eukaryotic-like actin regulation and polyproline binding. Commun. Biol. 4, 1024 (2021).
Google Scholar
Inturi, R., Lara, S., Derweesh, M. & Chi, C. N. Structural characterization of a Thorarchaeota profilin indicates eukaryotic-like features but with an extended N-terminus. Adv. Biol. 6, e2101323 (2022).
Google Scholar
Schleper, C. & Sousa, F. L. Meet the relatives of our cellular ancestor. Nature 577, 478–479 (2020).
Google Scholar
Baum, D. A. & Baum, B. An inside-out origin for the eukaryotic cell. BMC Biol. 12, 76 (2014).
Google Scholar
Manoharan, L. et al. Metagenomes from coastal marine sediments give insights into the ecological role and cellular features of Loki– and Thorarchaeota. mBio 10, e02039-19 (2019).
Google Scholar
Cai, M. et al. Ecological features and global distribution of Asgard archaea. Sci. Total Environ. 758, 143581 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wu, F. et al. Unique mobile elements and scalable gene flow at the prokaryote–eukaryote boundary revealed by circularized Asgard archaea genomes. Nat. Microbiol. 7, 200–212 (2022).
Google Scholar
Klappenbach, J. A., Dunbar, J. M. & Schmidt, T. M. rRNA operon copy number reflects ecological strategies of bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 1328–1333 (2000).
Google Scholar
Roller, B. R. K., Stoddard, S. F. & Schmidt, T. M. Exploiting rRNA operon copy number to investigate bacterial reproductive strategies. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16160 (2016).
Google Scholar
Luo, C., Rodriguez-R, L. M. & Konstantinidis, K. T. MyTaxa: an advanced taxonomic classifier for genomic and metagenomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, e73 (2014).
Google Scholar
Konstantinidis, K. T., Rosselló-Móra, R. & Amann, R. Uncultivated microbes in need of their own taxonomy. ISME J. 11, 2399–2406 (2017).
Google Scholar
Penev, P. I. et al. Supersized ribosomal RNA expansion segments in asgard archaea. Genome Biol. Evol. 12, 1694–1710 (2020).
Google Scholar
Rosenshine, I., Tchelet, R. & Mevarech, M. The mechanism of DNA transfer in the mating system of an archaebacterium. Science 245, 1387–1389 (1989).
Google Scholar
Nickell, S., Hegerl, R., Baumeister, W. & Rachel, R. Pyrodictium cannulae enter the periplasmic space but do not enter the cytoplasm, as revealed by cryo-electron tomography. J. Struct. Biol. 141, 34–42 (2003).
Google Scholar
Sivabalasarma, S. et al. Analysis of Cell–Cell Bridges in Haloferax volcanii using electron cryo-tomography reveal a continuous cytoplasm and S-layer. Front. Microbiol. 11, 612239 (2021).
Google Scholar
Marguet, E. et al. Membrane vesicles, nanopods and/or nanotubes produced by hyperthermophilic archaea of the genus Thermococcus. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 41, 436–442 (2013).
Google Scholar
Von Der Ecken, J. et al. Structure of the F-actin-tropomyosin complex. Nature 519, 114–117 (2015).
Google Scholar
Yutin, N., Wolf, M. Y., Wolf, Y. I. & Koonin, E. V. The origins of phagocytosis and eukaryogenesis. Biol. Direct 4, 9 (2009).
Google Scholar
Bernander, R., Lind, A. E. & Ettema, T. J. G. An archaeal origin for the actin cytoskeleton: implications for eukaryogenesis. Commun. Integr. Biol. 4, 664–667 (2011).
Google Scholar
Van den Ent, F., Amos, L. A. & Löwe, J. Prokaryotic origin of the actin cytoskeleton. Nature 413, 39–44 (2001).
Google Scholar
Pollard, T. D. & Cooper, J. A. Actin, a central player in cell shape and movement. Science 326, 1208–1212 (2009).
Google Scholar
Yin, X. et al. Subgroup level differences of physiological activities in marine Lokiarchaeota. ISME J. 15, 848–861 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jørgensen, S. L., Thorseth, I. H., Pedersen, R. B., Baumberger, T. & Schleper, C. Quantitative and phylogenetic study of the deep sea archaeal group in sediments of the arctic mid-ocean spreading ridge. Front. Microbiol. 4, 299 (2013).
Google Scholar
Jorgensen, S. L. et al. Correlating microbial community profiles with geochemical data in highly stratified sediments from the Arctic Mid-Ocean Ridge. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2846–E2855 (2012).
Google Scholar
Moreira, D. & López-García, P. Symbiosis between methanogenic archaea and δ-proteobacteria as the origin of eukaryotes: the syntrophic hypothesis. J. Mol. Evol. 47, 517–530 (1998).
Google Scholar
Martin, W. & Müller, M. The hydrogen hypothesis for the first eukaryote. Nature 392, 37–41 (1998).
Google Scholar
López-García, P. & Moreira, D. Eukaryogenesis, a syntrophy affair. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 1068–1070 (2019).
Google Scholar
Spang, A. et al. Proposal of the reverse flow model for the origin of the eukaryotic cell based on comparative analyses of Asgard archaeal metabolism. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 1138–1148 (2019).
Google Scholar
Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ludwig, W. et al. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1363–1371 (2004).
Google Scholar
Caporaso, J. G. et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4516–4522 (2011).
Google Scholar
Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 17, 10–12 (2011).
Google Scholar
Bolyen, E. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bokulich, N. A. et al. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 6, 90 (2018).
Google Scholar
Amann, R. I., Krumholz, L. & Stahl, D. A. Fluorescent-oligonucleotide probing of whole cells for determinative, phylogenetic, and environmental studies in microbiology. J. Bacteriol. 172, 762–770 (1990).
Google Scholar
Raskin, L., Stromley, J. M., Rittmann, B. E. & Stahl, D. A. Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes to describe natural communities of methanogens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 1232–1240 (1994).
Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, T. et al. In situ DNA-hybridization chain reaction (HCR): a facilitated in situ HCR system for the detection of environmental microorganisms. Environ. Microbiol. 17, 2532–2541 (2015).
Google Scholar
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).
Google Scholar
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
Google Scholar
Prjibelski, A., Antipov, D., Meleshko, D., Lapidus, A. & Korobeynikov, A. Using SPAdes de novo assembler. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 70, e102 (2020).
Google Scholar
Graham, E. D., Heidelberg, J. F. & Tully, B. J. Binsanity: unsupervised clustering of environmental microbial assemblies using coverage and affinity propagation. PeerJ 5, e3035 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wu, Y. W., Simmons, B. A. & Singer, S. W. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 32, 605–607 (2016).
Google Scholar
Kang, D. D., Froula, J., Egan, R. & Wang, Z. MetaBAT, an efficient tool for accurately reconstructing single genomes from complex microbial communities. PeerJ 3, 31165 (2015).
Alneberg, J. et al. Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition. Nat. Methods 11, 1144–1146 (2014).
Google Scholar
Sieber, C. M. K. et al. Recovery of genomes from metagenomes via a dereplication, aggregation and scoring strategy. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 836–843 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chaumeil, P. A., Mussig, A. J., Hugenholtz, P. & Parks, D. H. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 36, 1925–1927 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wick, R. R., Judd, L. M., Gorrie, C. L. & Holt, K. E. Completing bacterial genome assemblies with multiplex MinION sequencing. Microb. Genom. 3, e000132 (2017).
De Coster, W., D’Hert, S., Schultz, D. T., Cruts, M. & Van Broeckhoven, C. NanoPack: visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics 34, 2666–2669 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, M. et al. metaFlye: scalable long-read metagenome assembly using repeat graphs. Nat. Methods 17, 1103–1110 (2020).
Google Scholar
Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34, 3094–3100 (2018).
Google Scholar
Danecek, P. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience 10, giab008 (2021).
Google Scholar
Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).
Google Scholar
Shen, W., Le, S., Li, Y. & Hu, F. SeqKit: a cross-platform and ultrafast toolkit for FASTA/Q file manipulation. PLoS ONE 11, e0163962 (2016).
Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, M., Yuan, J., Lin, Y. & Pevzner, P. A. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 540–546 (2019).
Google Scholar
Walker, B. J. et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS ONE 9, e112963 (2014).
Google Scholar
Giguere, D. J. et al. Complete and validated genomes from a metagenome. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.08.032540 (2020).
Seemann, T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069 (2014).
Google Scholar
Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).
Google Scholar
Criscuolo, A. & Gribaldo, S. BMGE (Block Mapping and Gathering with Entropy): a new software for selection of phylogenetic informative regions from multiple sequence alignments. BMC Evol. Biol. 10, 210 (2010).
Google Scholar
Minh, B. Q. et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 1530–1534 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hoang, D. T., Chernomor, O., Von Haeseler, A., Minh, B. Q. & Vinh, L. S. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 518–522 (2018).
Google Scholar
Mistry, J. et al. Pfam: the protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D412–D419 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kanehisa, M., Sato, Y. & Morishima, K. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 726–731 (2016).
Google Scholar
Xie, Z. & Tang, H. ISEScan: automated identification of insertion sequence elements in prokaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics 33, 3340–3347 (2017).
Google Scholar
Li, L., Stoeckert, C. J. J. & Roos, D. S. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 13, 2178–2189 (2003).
Google Scholar
Farrer, R. A. Synima: a synteny imaging tool for annotated genome assemblies. BMC Bioinform. 18, 507 (2017).
Google Scholar
Haas, B. J., Delcher, A. L., Wortman, J. R. & Salzberg, S. L. DAGchainer: a tool for mining segmental genome duplications and synteny. Bioinformatics 20, 3643–3646 (2004).
Google Scholar
Hao, Z. et al. RIdeogram: drawing SVG graphics to visualize and map genome-wide data on the idiograms. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 6, e251 (2020).
Google Scholar
Fu, L., Niu, B., Zhu, Z., Wu, S. & Li, W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28, 3150–3152 (2012).
Google Scholar
Capella-Gutiérrez, S., Silla-Martínez, J. M. & Gabaldón, T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–1973 (2009).
Google Scholar
Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B. Q., Wong, T. K. F., Von Haeseler, A. & Jermiin, L. S. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 14, 587–589 (2017).
Google Scholar
Brameyer, S. et al. Outer membrane vesicles facilitate trafficking of the hydrophobic signaling molecule CAI-1 between Vibrio harveyi cells. J. Bacteriol. 200, e00740-17 (2018).
Google Scholar
Flechsler, J. et al. 2D and 3D immunogold localization on (epoxy) ultrathin sections with and without osmium tetroxide. Microsc. Res. Tech. 83, 691–705 (2020).
Google Scholar
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).
Google Scholar
Weiss, G. L., Medeiros, J. M. & Pilhofer, M. in Bacterial Protein Secretion Systems (eds Journet, L. & Cascales, E.) 353–375 (Humana Press, 2017).
Tivol, W. F., Briegel, A. & Jensen, G. J. An improved cryogen for plunge freezing. Microsc. Microanal. 14, 375–379 (2008).
Google Scholar
Iancu, C. V. et al. Electron cryotomography sample preparation using the Vitrobot. Nat. Protoc. 1, 2813–2819 (2007).
Google Scholar
Mastronarde, D. N. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36–51 (2005).
Google Scholar
Schorb, M., Haberbosch, I., Hagen, W. J. H., Schwab, Y. & Mastronarde, D. N. Software tools for automated transmission electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 16, 471–477 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hagen, W. J. H., Wan, W. & Briggs, J. A. G. Implementation of a cryo-electron tomography tilt-scheme optimized for high resolution subtomogram averaging. J. Struct. Biol. 197, 191–198 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kremer, J. R., Mastronarde, D. N. & McIntosh, J. R. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 116, 71–76 (1996).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y.-T. et al. Isotropic reconstruction for electron tomography with deep learning. Nat. Commun. 13, 6482 (2022).
Hylton, R. K., Heebner, J. E., Grillo, M. A. & Swulius, M. T. Cofilactin filaments regulate filopodial structure and dynamics in neuronal growth cones. Nat. Commun. 13, 2439 (2022).
Google Scholar
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zivanov, J. et al. A Bayesian approach to single-particle electron cryo-tomography in RELION-4.0. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.28.482229 (2022).
Castaño-Díez, D., Kudryashev, M., Arheit, M. & Stahlberg, H. Dynamo: a flexible, user-friendly development tool for subtomogram averaging of cryo-EM data in high-performance computing environments. J. Struct. Biol. 178, 139–151 (2012).
Google Scholar
Sas-Chen, A. et al. Dynamic RNA acetylation revealed by quantitative cross-evolutionary mapping. Nature 583, 638–643 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sweeney, B. A. et al. R2DT is a framework for predicting and visualising RNA secondary structure using templates. Nat. Commun. 12, 3494 (2021).
Google Scholar
Martins, B. et al. Unveiling the polarity of actin filaments by cryo-electron tomography. Structure 29, 488–498 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, Z. et al. The molecular basis for sarcomere organization in vertebrate skeletal muscle. Cell 184, 2135–2150 (2021).
Google Scholar
He, S. & Scheres, S. H. W. Helical reconstruction in RELION. J. Struct. Biol. 198, 163–176 (2017).
Google Scholar