Category Archives: Health

What To Do After Testing Positive for COVID-19 in Massachusetts – NBC Boston

With COVID-19 cases rising in Massachusetts and most of the state now considered high risk for community transmission, it may be time to revisit quarantine guidance.

What should you do if you test positive for COVID-19?

The latest virus quarantine guidance, as posted on the Massachusetts Department of Public Health website, is primarily based on two factors – how long since your positive test result, and whether or not the activity you want to do allows you to wear a mask.

If you test positive, you should stay home and isolate for at least the first five days. If you never experienced symptoms, or your symptoms are improving, you can resume most normal activities that you can do wearing a mask on day 6. You should wear a mask around others for a full 10 days, including the people you live with.

If you cannot wear a mask, or the activity you want to do doesn’t allow for a mask, you should stay home and isolate for 10 days. If you’ve never had symptoms or your symptoms are improving, you can resume normal activities on day 11. You are still encouraged to wear a mask around others in your household for 10 days.

This guidance is the same whether you are vaccinated against COVID-19 or not.

How do I count days to isolate?

  • Day 0 of isolation should be your first day of symptoms OR the day your positive test was taken, whichever is earlier.
  • Days 1-4 are strict isolation days, unless you’re going out to receive medical care.
  • Day 5 is the last full day of isolation if you were asymptomatic or if symptoms have been improving.
  • Day 6 is when you can leave isolation, if wearing a mask.
  • Day 11 is when you can leave isolation without a mask.

Mass. DPH notes that there may be circumstances where individuals may be allowed to return to child care, school or a health care job sooner under certain conditions. More on that here.

What if I was exposed to someone with COVID-19?

Here is where the guidance differs depending on your vaccination status. If you are a close contact of someone who tested positive for the virus, and you are up to date on COVID-19 vaccinations, you do not need to quarantine, but you should wear a mask around others for 10 days, including at home. You should also take a rapid antigen or PCR test on day 5, or if you develop symptoms. If you test positive, follow the isolation guidance. If you are not able to mask, you should quarantine for 10 days after the exposure, and follow the same testing guidelines as above.

If you are a close contact and you are not up to date on COVID-19 vaccinations or unvaccinated, it is recommended you quarantine for five days after exposure, wearing a mask around others, including at home. It is also recommended that you wear a mask around others for an additional five days after that quarantine period, including at home. If you cannot wear a mask, extend that quarantine to 10 days. You should test on day 5, or if symptoms develop. If you do not take a test on day 5, you should quarantine for a full 10 days.

When should I seek emergency medical attention?

The CDC recommends you look out for the following emergency warning signs* for COVID-19:

  • Trouble breathing
  • Persistent pain or pressure in the chest
  • New confusion
  • Inability to wake or stay awake
  • Pale, gray, or blue-colored skin, lips, or nail beds, depending on skin tone

*This list is not all possible symptoms. Please call your medical provider for any other symptoms that are severe or concerning to you.

Top Boston doctors discuss COVID cases in Massachusetts, the BA.2.12.1 omicron subvariant and whether masks should be required for schools in high risk communities during NBC10 Boston’s weekly “COVID Q&A” series.

When should I get tested?

The CDC outlines several scenarios for getting tested — if you are experiencing symptoms, if you’ve been exposed to someone with COVID-19 (as outlined above) or if you are going to an indoor event or large gathering. The last one is especially important if attending a gathering with high-risk individuals, older adults, anyone who is immunocompromised, or anyone who is not up to date on their COVID-19 vaccines, including young children who cannot be vaccinated yet.

What are the symptoms of COVID-19?

COVID-19 can manifest in a variety of ways. Here are the most commonly reported symptoms. Symptoms can appear anywhere from 2 to 14 days after exposure to the virus.

  • Fever or chills
  • Cough
  • Shortness of breath or difficulty breathing
  • Fatigue
  • Muscle or body aches
  • Headache
  • New loss of taste or smell
  • Sore throat
  • Congestion or runny nose
  • Nausea or vomiting
  • Diarrhea

Massachusetts’ latest COVID-19 data

All but three of Massachusetts’ 14 counties are now considered high risk for COVID-19, according to the latest data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Massachusetts’ COVID metrics, tracked on the Department of Public Health’s interactive coronavirus dashboard, have declined since the omicron surge, but case counts and hospitalizations are starting to increase once again.

State health officials reported 5,576 new COVID-19 cases Thursday. The last time there were over 5,000 new cases reported in a single day was at the end of January. The state’s seven-day average positivity rate increased to 8.24% Thursday, compared to 7.89% on Wednesday. The number of new COVID-19 cases in Massachusetts schools has also shot up significantly, rising 62.6% in the past week.

What about the rest of New England?

In New Hampshire, the entire state is now considered either high or medium risk. Grafton, Rockingham and Sullivan counties are designated as high risk, while the rest of the state is medium risk.

In Vermont, only Essex County remains low risk. Addison, Bennington, Chittenden, Franklin, Orange, Rutland Washington and Windsor are high risk, with Caledonia, Grand Isle, Lamoille, Orleans and Windham counties at medium risk.

Four Maine counties — Aroostook, Hancock, Penobscot and Piscatiquis — are considered high risk, with the remainder of the state in the medium risk category.

In Connecticut, Hartford, Litchfield, Middlesex, New Haven, Tolland and Windham counties are all high risk, with Fairfield and New London in the medium risk category.

All of Rhode Island remains in the medium risk category for the second straight week.

Residents in counties with a high risk are urged to wear masks indoors in public and on public transportation, to stay up to date with vaccines and to get tested if they have symptoms, according to the CDC.

Residents in areas with medium risk are encouraged to wear a mask if they have symptoms, a positive test or exposure to someone with COVID-19. Anyone at high risk for severe illness should also consider wearing a mask indoors in public and taking additional precautions, the CDC says.

The majority of cases in New England right now are still being attributed to the “stealth” omicron variant BA.2, although cases of the BA.2.12.1 subvariant are on the rise. Increases in cases in South Africa and other countries are raising concerns that the U.S. could soon experience another COVID-19 wave.

Despite the rising cases here, Massachusetts and the other New England states have yet to take any steps to bring back mask mandates or any other COVID-related restrictions that were relaxed following January’s omicron-fueled surge.

Read original article here

Masks recommended indoors in 9 N.J. counties with ‘high’ COVID risk, CDC says

Masks are now recommended for indoor public places and on public transportation in nine New Jersey counties for the first time since federal COVID-19 risk guidelines were updated in February.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention elevated the nine counties in the state to “high” transmission risk for COVID-19 as cases continue to steadily increase. New Jersey reported 5,309 confirmed positive tests on Friday, the first time more than 5,000 cases have been reported since late January during the winter omicron wave.

The counties ranked as “high” risk include Atlantic, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Gloucester, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean and Sussex, according to the CDC’s metrics.

Eleven counties are in the medium risk category: Bergen, Essex, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Union, and Warren. Warren County is in the low risk category. Masks are not recommended in the medium and low regions.

Gov. Phil Murphy ended remaining statewide mask mandates for schools and public transit in March as the omicron wave eased. He said as recently as last month that he doesn’t envision a return to statewide mask rules or other restrictions.

Murphy’s office did not immediately respond Friday afternoon to a request for comment on nine counties being elevated to high transmission risk.

The CDC’s revised metrics introduced in February take into account case rate by population over the last seven days along with hospital admissions and hospital capacity.

New Jersey’s 71 hospitals had 727 patients with confirmed or suspected coronavirus as of Thursday night, down 16 patients from the previous night. Still, the numbers of hospitalized coronavirus remain far lower than when they peaked at 6,089 on Jan. 10 during the omicron wave.

The state’s seven-day average for confirmed positive tests increased to 3,453 on Friday, up 39% from a week ago, and up 136% from a month ago. Cases have been steadily rising for the past month, despite concerns that wide availability of at-home rapid tests are going uncounted because they are not reported to health officials.

New Jersey has seen the BA.2 strain of COVID-19 spread for weeks, however, at lower rates than the sweeping omicron surge in late 2021 through January. The latest strain of the virus apparently spreads more easily but does not lead to more serious illnesses.

NJ Advance Media staff writers Brent Johnson and Deion Johnson contributed to this report.

Thank you for relying on us to provide the local news you can trust. Please consider supporting NJ.com with a voluntary subscription.

Noah Cohen may be reached at ncohen@njadvancemedia.com.

Read original article here

Wear a mask in these Michigan counties as COVID-19 surges

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention now recommends that people in 16 Michigan counties wear masks again in indoor, public places as the coronavirus surges and hospitalizations climb.

The CDC updated its map Thursday evening that details community risk from COVID-19, showing all of metro Detroit now in the high-risk category as well as many counties in the northwestern lower peninsula.

They are: Washtenaw, Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, Livingston, St. Clair, Chippewa, Mackinac, Emmet, Cheboygan, Antrim, Kalkaska, Grand Traverse, Benzie, Manistee and Calhoun.

In those 16 high-risk counties, the CDC recommends:

  • Wearing a mask in indoor, public places.
  • Staying up to date with COVID-19 vaccines, including boosters if you’re eligible.
  • Getting tested if you’re symptomatic.
  • If you are at high risk for severe disease from the virus, the agency recommends considering other precautions, such as avoiding nonessential indoor activities that could lead to exposure.

More: Michigan is facing ‘unique moment’ of COVID-19 history, expert says, as cases rise

More: Got a positive COVID-19 test? New treatments can help keep you out of the hospital

Even though masks are recommended yet again in large swaths of the state, public health officials in Wayne, Oakland, Washtenaw and Macomb counties and the city of Detroit told the Free Press on Friday they aren’t going to mandate them at this stage.

“We are not planning to issue orders at this point,” said Susan Ringler Cerniglia, a spokesperson for the Washtenaw County Health Department. “Based on our guidance, we expect some entities, especially our higher-risk or group settings, to require it again while we’re at a high community level. This would include schools, public agencies, shelters, etc. if they’re not currently requiring universal masking indoors.” 

As the omicron subvariants BA.2 and BA.2.12.1 gain prevalence, the virus is spreading quickly in other parts of the state as well.

Twenty-eight Michigan counties now have moderate levels of transmission, according to the CDC.

They are: Gogebic, Ontonagon, Marquette, Presque Isle, Alpena, Montmorency, Otsego, Alcona, Crawford, Charlevoix, Leelanau, Kent, Barry, Kalamazoo, Eaton, Clinton, Gratiot, Isabella, Ingham, Shiawassee, Saginaw, Midland, Bay, Genesee, Sanilac, Monroe, Lenawee, Jackson.

[ Want more updates on COVID-19 in Michigan? Download our app for the latest ]

In those counties, the CDC recommends:

  • Talking to your health care provider about whether to wear a mask or take other precautions if you’re at high risk for severe illness with COVID-19.
  • Staying up to date with COVID-19 vaccines.
  • Getting tested if you are symptomatic.

The state health department reported 901 people were hospitalized with confirmed cases of coronavirus Friday — more than double the number hospitalized a month ago, when 429 people with the virus were getting hospital care. 

It’s still nowhere near the levels of COVID-19 hospitalization Michigan saw in January, when the state hit pandemic peaks with more than 4,600 people hospitalized.

The state reached a seven-day average of 3,958 new daily cases on Wednesday — the highest point since February, when Michigan was coming down from the initial omicron surge.

The latest wave of infections comes as the nation marked its 1 millionth death from the virus and U.S. flags across the country are lowered to half-staff to honor the dead.

More: Death of Grosse Pointe Woods man haunted Oprah Winfrey, inspired documentary

What it means: COVID-19 cases in Michigan expected to climb through May

Even though few pandemic restrictions remain in place, people can still choose to take steps to protect themselves by getting vaccinated, boosted and using some tried-and-true mitigation measures, according to Emily Martin, associate professor of epidemiology for the University of Michigan School of Public Health. 

“Even though the political landscape has changed and sort of the recommendation landscape has changed, the same things work now that worked a few months ago,” Martin said in a Twitter Space chat discussing the future of COVID-19.

“Masks still work, and higher-quality masks still provide a higher level of protection. Being outdoors is still better than being indoors and being in less crowded spaces is still … better than being in crowded spaces.”

Treatments like the antiviral drug Paxlovid are available now that can reduce the risk of hospitalization or death from the virus. Monoclonal antibody therapy is an option, too, for people who are vulnerable. 

“And the sooner you test, the sooner you can access treatment and the sooner … you use them, the better they work,” Martin said. “There are things that we can do with a positive result to make you feel better. And so it’s important to test so that you know that you’re positive so then you can seek the treatment.”

That the state is in the throes of yet another COVID-19 surge is frustrating to Lauren Metiva, 42, of Wyandotte. 

A home health nurse, Metiva is fully vaccinated and two of her three children are, too. But her youngest daughter, 4½-year-old Annabelle, is still not eligible because none of the COVID-19 vaccines have won emergency-use authorization for kids under the age of 5. 

Metiva said she bristles when public health leaders talk about personal responsibility in getting vaccinated because that isn’t an option for her daughter.

“I don’t think I’ve ever heard from any of the health officials or experts the caveat of ‘Well, we’re sorry. We recognize that this still isn’t available for a certain amount of the population.’ It’s just frustrating to read it over and over and over again get vaccinated and I cannot get her vaccinated,” she said.

Though a U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s advisory committee is scheduled in early June to discuss applications from Pfizer and Moderna to use their vaccines in kids as young as 6 months old, it feels to Metiva like young children have been left out for too long.

“I just have seen firsthand how devastating COVID can be to healthy individuals,” she said. “I’m worried about COVID. I’m worried about the inflammatory disease they’ve seen in children. I’m worried about long COVID. I’m worried about all the opportunities to do things that I’ve kept her from.

“I’ve kept her out of preschool. We did do swim lessons, but when she’s doing swim lessons there is a lot of anxiety. It’s gone on for so long that I feel like I’m constantly calculating risk about where it’s better to take her and where it’s better to pass. It’s been a really long time and I’m very frustrated.”

Contact Kristen Jordan Shamus: kshamus@freepress.com. Follow her on Twitter @kristenshamus. 

Follow her on Twitter @kristenshamus. 

Read original article here

How Sleep Helps to Process Emotions

Summary: Study sheds light on how the brain processes emotions during dream sleep by consolidating positive emotions while dampening the consolidation of negative emotions. The findings could pave the way for new treatments for PTSD and other disorders associated with negative emotional processing.

Source: University of Bern

Researchers at the Department of Neurology of the University of Bern and University Hospital Bern identified how the brain triages emotions during dream sleep to consolidate the storage of positive emotions while dampening the consolidation of negative ones.

The work expands the importance of sleep in mental health and offers the way to new therapeutic strategies.

Rapid eye movement (REM or paradoxical) sleep is a unique and mysterious sleep state during which most dreams occur together with intense emotional contents.

How and why these emotions are reactivated is unclear. The prefrontal cortex integrates many of these emotions during wakefulness but appears paradoxically quiescent during REM sleep.

“Our goal was to understand the underlying mechanism and the functions of such a surprising phenomenon,” says Prof. Antoine Adamantidis from the Department of Biomedical Research (DBMR) at the University of Bern and the Department of Neurology at the Inselspital, University Hospital of Bern.

Processing emotions, particularly distinguishing between danger and safety, is critical for the survival of animals.

In humans, excessively negative emotions, such as fear reactions and states of anxiety, lead to pathological states like Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). In Europe, roughly 15% of the population is affected by persistent anxiety and severe mental illness.

The research group headed by Antoine Adamantidis is now providing insights into how the brain helps to reinforce positive emotions and weaken strongly negative or traumatic emotions during REM sleep.

This study was published in the journal Science.

A dual mechanism

The researchers first conditioned mice to recognize auditory stimuli associated with safety and others associated with danger (aversive stimuli). The activity of neurons in the brain of mice was then recorded during sleep-wake cycles.

In this way, the researchers were able to map different areas of a cell and determine how emotional memories are transformed during REM sleep.  

Neurons are composed of a cell body (soma) that integrates information coming from the dendrites (inputs) and sends signals to other neurons via their axons (outputs). The results obtained showed that cell somas are kept silent while their dendrites are activated.

“This means a decoupling of the two cellular compartments, in other words soma wide asleep and dendrites wide awake,” explains Adamantidis.

This decoupling is important because the strong activity of the dendrites allows the encoding of both danger and safety emotions, while the inhibitions of the soma completely block the output of the circuit during REM sleep. In other words, the brain favors the discrimination of safety versus danger in the dendrites, but blocks the over-reaction to emotion, in particular danger.

A survival advantage

According to the researchers, the coexistence of both mechanisms is beneficial to the stability and survival of the organisms:

“This bi-directional mechanism is essential to optimize the discrimination between dangerous and safe signals,” says Mattia Aime from the DBMR, first author of the study. If this discrimination is missing in humans and excessive fear reactions are generated, this can lead to anxiety disorders.

How and why these emotions are reactivated is unclear. Image is in the public domain

The findings are particularly relevant to pathological conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorders, in which trauma is over-consolidated in the prefrontal cortex, day after day during sleep.

Breakthrough for sleep medicine

These findings pave the way to a better understanding of the processing of emotions during sleep in humans and open new perspectives for therapeutic targets to treat maladaptive processing of traumatic memories, such as post-traumatic stress disorders (PTSD) and their early sleep-dependent consolidation.

Additional acute or chronic mental health issues that may implicate this somatodendritic decoupling during sleep include acute and chronic stress, anxiety, depression, panic, or even anhedonia, the inability to feel pleasure.

See also

Sleep research and sleep medicine have long been a research focus of the University of Bern and the Inselspital, Bern University Hospital.

“We hope that our findings will not only be of interest to the patients, but also to the broad public,” says Adamantidis.

About this sleep and emotional processing research news

Author: Press Office
Source: University of Bern
Contact: Press Office – University of Bern
Image: The image is in the public domain

Original Research: Closed access.
“Paradoxical somatodendritic decoupling supports cortical plasticity during REM sleep” by Mattia Aime et al. Science


Abstract

Paradoxical somatodendritic decoupling supports cortical plasticity during REM sleep

Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep is associated with the consolidation of emotional memories. Yet, the underlying neocortical circuits and synaptic mechanisms remain unclear.

We found that REM sleep is associated with a somatodendritic decoupling in pyramidal neurons of the prefrontal cortex.

This decoupling reflects a shift of inhibitory balance between parvalbumin neuron–mediated somatic inhibition and vasoactive intestinal peptide–mediated dendritic disinhibition, mostly driven by neurons from the central medial thalamus.

REM-specific optogenetic suppression of dendritic activity led to a loss of danger-versus-safety discrimination during associative learning and a lack of synaptic plasticity, whereas optogenetic release of somatic inhibition resulted in enhanced discrimination and synaptic potentiation.

Somatodendritic decoupling during REM sleep promotes opposite synaptic plasticity mechanisms that optimize emotional responses to future behavioral stressors.

Read original article here

Eating chocolate SLASHES risk of dying young by 12 per cent, major study reveals

EATING chocolate cuts the danger of dying young by 12 per cent, a study says.

Regular consumers’ risk of fatal heart disease or cancer falls by up to 16 per cent.

1

Eating chocolate SLASHES risk of dying young by 12 per cent, a major study revealsCredit: Alamy

Fans who munch the equivalent of two Dairy Milk bars a week were four times less likely to suffer diabetes than those who eat none.

Experts say chocolate can lower bad cholesterol and blood pressure and, to cap it all, devotees tend to be slimmer and more active.

Scientists say compounds in cocoa known as flavonoids boost the health of blood vessels.

Prof Jiaqi Huang, of the US National Cancer Institute in Maryland, said the study may “partially allay concerns regarding adverse health outcomes from low-to-moderate chocolate consumption”.

The British Heart Foundation said the study was not conclusive enough for it to recommend eating chocolate to lessen heart disease risk.

It said: “It’s fine to treat yourself now and again, but no single food or nutrient is more important than an overall balanced healthy diet.”

We pay for your stories!

Do you have a story for The Sun news desk?



Read original article here

SF Bay Area health officers issue guidance amid COVID surge

Amid a surge in COVID-19 cases, county health officers across the San Francisco Bay Area issued a statement Friday, recommending that people take safety precautions including wearing masks in indoor public places, testing and keeping up with vaccinations.

Health officers issued the recommendation as opposed to a mandate (as they have done in past surges) because while cases are skyrocketing, hospitalizations remain relatively low. The region is well protected from serious illness and death due to immunity from vaccinations and past infection, more so than it was before the emergence of the omicron variant.

“I think we’re recognizing that there’s something in between a mandate and a world where nobody is covering their faces,” Marin County Health Officer Dr. Matt Willis told SFGATE of the guidance. “Our hope is we can achieve a middle ground where people can recognize the value of face coverings. The Bay Area is clearly seeing a surge in COVID activity, and people need to recognize that and take that into account when they’re out and about, and a mask is a helpful way to prevent infection.”

“People who are at high risk of severe illness, or who are in close contact with someone at high risk should be especially vigilant as we get through this current swell in cases,” San Francisco Health Officer Dr. Susan Philip said in a news release.


The recommendation was endorsed by all counties in the San Francisco Bay Area except Solano.

Willis said that people who want to avoid infection should wear a higher quality mask such as a N95 and KN95 rather than a cloth face covering. 

“Our residents at the highest risk for serious infection should know if they go to a public place right now, there’s a high likelihood someone in that room is infected,” Willis said. 

COVID-19 cases have been increasing in California since early April, and the greater San Francisco Bay Area is reporting more new cases per day than most other areas in the state. San Francisco’s seven-day average went from 79 new cases a day on March 13 to 343 new cases a day on May 5. At the January peak, the city was reporting an average of 2,377 cases a day.

Willis noted that case numbers are even higher than what’s being reported since so many people are using home tests. 

“I estimate that at least half of the cases aren’t being detected right now” he said. “It’s everywhere.”

As of May 9, there were 61 COVID-19 patients in acute and intensive care in San Francisco compared to 286 people at the January peak. “In San Francisco, hospitalizations are increasing but remain relatively low compared to previous surges and well within the capacity of the hospital system,” the city’s public health department said in a statement. The emergence of the omicron variant has led hospitals to recognize the issue of “incidental positives,” where hospitalization numbers are overcounted due to patients in the hospital for other reasons testing positive for COVID-19 and being counted as COVID-19 patients.

Omicron subvariants — especially the new BA.2.12.1 — are driving the swell in cases. While the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has said preliminary data suggest that BA.2.12.1 does not cause more serious disease, it is more transmissible than its predecessors.

“BA.2.12.1 is thought to be 25% more transmissible than BA.2, which is itself 30% to 80% more transmissible than BA.1, which is itself 200% more transmissible than delta,” UCSF infectious diseases expert Dr. Peter Chin-Hong told SFGATE for a story published earlier this week on why cases are climbing in the Bay Area.

Read original article here

Life-threatening inflammation is turning COVID-19 into a chronic disease

GAINESVILLE, Fla. — Long COVID continues to be a lingering problem for more and more coronavirus patients in the months following their infection. Now, a new study contends that the life-threatening inflammation many patients experience — causing long-term damage to their health — is turning COVID-19 into a chronic condition.

“When someone has a cold or even pneumonia, we usually think of the illness being over once the patient recovers. This is different from a chronic disease, like congestive heart failure or diabetes, which continue to affect patients after an acute episode. We may similarly need to start thinking of COVID-19 as having ongoing effects in many parts of the body after patients have recovered from the initial episode,” says first author Professor Arch G. Mainous III, vice chair for research in the Department of Community Health and Family Medicine at the University of Florida Gainesville, in a media release.

“Once we recognize the importance of ‘long COVID’ after seeming ‘recovery’, we need to focus on treatments to prevent later problems, such as strokes, brain dysfunction, and especially premature death.”

COVID inflammation increases risk of death one year later

The study finds COVID patients experiencing severe inflammation while in the hospital saw their risk of death skyrocket by 61 percent over the next year post-recovery.

Inflammation raising the risk of death after an illness is a seemingly confusing concept. Typically, inflammation is a natural part of the body’s immune response and healing process. However, some illnesses including COVID-19 cause this infection-fighting response to overshoot. Previous studies call this the “cytokine storm,” an event where the immune system starts attacking healthy tissue.

“COVID-19 is known to create inflammation, particularly during the first, acute episode. Our study is the first to examine the relationship between inflammation during hospitalization for COVID-19 and mortality after the patient has ‘recovered’,” Prof. Mainous says.

“Here we show that the stronger the inflammation during the initial hospitalization, the greater the probability that the patient will die within 12 months after seemingly ‘recovering’ from COVID-19.”

There is a way to stop harmful inflammation

The study examined the health records of 1,207 adults hospitalized for COVID-19 in the University of Florida health system between 2020 and 2021. Researchers followed them for at least one year after discharge — keeping track of their C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. This protein is secreted by the liver and is a common measure of systemic inflammation.

Results show patients with a more severe case of the virus and those needing oxygen or ventilation had higher CRP levels during their hospitalization. The patients with the highest CRP concentrations had a 61-percent increased risk of death over the next year after their release from the hospital.

However, the team did find that prescribing anti-inflammatory steroids after hospitalization lowered the risk of death by 51 percent. Study authors say their findings show that the current recommendations for care after a coronavirus infection need to change. Researchers recommend more widespread use of orally taken steroids following a severe case of COVID.

These results appear in the journal Frontiers in Medicine.



Read original article here

‘This is not my kid’: Mysterious hepatitis wreaked havoc in healthy child with shocking speed

“Her eyes didn’t look like they were attached to her head anymore,” her mom, Kelsea Schwab, told CNN Chief Medical Correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta. “They were just rolling all over.

“She would still ask for bananas and ask for juice and ask for snuggles, kind of like she’s still there, but not really,” she said.

Seemingly out of nowhere, Baelyn’s liver had become so damaged that it could no longer clean ammonia out of her blood.

She’s part of a nationwide investigation by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention into recent cases of sudden severe hepatitis — or swelling of the liver — in 109 children in 25 states and territories. There are roughly 340 more children with similar cases around the world, the, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control reported on Wednesday.

In the US, five of the children have died, and 15 have needed liver transplants.

Globally, including the US, there have been 11 deaths, and in the UK, 11 children have received liver transplants.

Like Baelyn, most of the children are young — under the age of 5. Many had no apparent health problems before showing signs of liver injury: They lost their appetites. Their skin and eyes began to turn yellow, symptom called jaundice. Some had dark urine and cloudy gray stool.

Within a week, Baelyn had gone from running around her family’s farm in Aberdeen, South Dakota, playing with her sister and watching the children’s TV show “Blippi,” to a room in the pediatric intensive care unit at M Health Fairview Masonic Children’s Hospital in Minneapolis, where doctors were checking her blood four or five times a day, watching to see if her liver might recover. But it didn’t.

“Slowly watching her deteriorate like that, like her muscles, she would start shaking, and she had a hard time sitting up, and she couldn’t hold her head up, and just watching her go through that was like, ‘this is not my kid,’ ” Schwab said. “Like, am I ever even going to get her back?”

‘This is very unusual for us’

The liver has a number of important roles. It controls clotting factors in the blood. It contributes to the body’s immune response. It also filters out ammonia that is produced when bacteria in the intestines break down protein. When the liver is working as it should, ammonia gets changed into urea and flushed out of the body as urine.

Normal blood levels of ammonia are between 25 and 40, says Dr. Srinath Chinnakotla, surgical director of the liver transplant program at M Health Fairview Masonic Children’s Hospital.

“Anything over 100, you can get symptoms,” Chinnakotla said. “So what happens is that the brain starts swelling, and then they become comatose. And if you don’t transplant them appropriately, they can have brain damage” — or, worse, die.

Baelyn’s ammonia level had gotten as high as 109.

“That’s when I got a little bit nervous,” Chinnakotla said. At levels that high, “the kidneys shut down; the patient becomes comatose. And then you know you are behind the eight ball.”

People waiting for liver transplants can get so sick that they can’t withstand the procedure. That’s the situation Chinnakotla did not want Baelyn to be in.

Chinnakotla, a world-renowned surgeon and one of only a few dozen specialists who perform pediatric liver transplants in the United States, put Baelyn on a transplant waiting list.

Children automatically get highest priority, a status called 1A, reserved for those who have hours or days to live.

In an average year, he might do this surgery on 10 children. Most of them need new livers because they were born with autoimmune diseases or birth defects. Maybe one might need a new liver because of sudden liver failure.

“And this year,” he said, “we’ve already seen two children with liver failure and transplanted two children with liver failure. This is very unusual for us.”

A medical mystery

Disease detectives aren’t sure what’s causing these hepatitis cases.

Dr. Jay Butler, the CDC’s deputy director of infectious diseases, said at a briefing last week that the agency was “casting a wide net” to look at all possible exposures and associations.

Even before this outbreak, sudden liver failure cases like this often puzzled doctors.

“I’ve taken care of a half-dozen or a dozen kids where we did our best look, and we never found a cause for why their livers just failed,” said Dr. Beth Thielen, a pediatric infectious disease specialist at the University of Minnesota who has been treating Baelyn. “And some of them got better, or some of them went to transplant, so this happens at some base frequency.

“And I think what has drawn people’s attention is that this seems to be happening more frequently, and there does seem to be this association with adenovirus — not every child, but there does seem to be a larger percentage of these cases that do seem to be associated with adenovirus,” Thielen said.

More than half the children in the CDC’s investigation — including Baelyn — have tested positive for adenovirus 41, a type of virus that ordinarily causes stomach upset and cold-like symptoms. It has never before been linked to liver failure in otherwise healthy children.

Doctors aren’t sure how this virus might be involved. It’s not clear whether it could be directly damaging the liver or setting off an unusual immune response that’s causing the body to attack its own tissues. Another possibility is that adenovirus has an accomplice, a co-factor that could be genetic, environmental or even infectious, that in tandem is leading to these extreme outcomes.

Because these cases are happening amid the pandemic, researchers are also looking for any link to the virus that causes Covid-19. Some of the children in the investigation, including Baelyn, have a history of Covid-19 infection, but others don’t. Investigators says it’s too early to know whether it’s a factor.

Baelyn tested positive for adenovirus in her blood but not in her liver tissue. It’s a pattern doctors have noticed in other children, too. In Baelyn’s case, her doctors say her liver may have been so damaged by the time they tested it that they couldn’t find the virus. They’ve sent tissue samples to the CDC for more specialized testing.

The adenovirus infection created a quandary for Baelyn’s doctors. Ordinarily, adenovirus infections are relatively mild-mannered, and the link to liver failure in these children is still uncertain.

But what if it was the culprit?

Patients who get organ transplants must have their immune function turned down with powerful medications so their bodies won’t reject the new organ. The drugs might diminish Baelyn’s immune function, allowing the smoldering infection to reignite and burn out of control.

If the adenovirus had destroyed one healthy liver, could it attack another? Would they give her a new liver only to see that one ravaged, too?

They could treat the adenovirus, but the drug they would need to use — cidofovir — is toxic to the kidneys.

It was a risk.

With so much uncertainty still about the cause of these infections, should they use this powerful antiviral in a medically fragile child?

They decided to try it but to watch her carefully. They didn’t have time to wait for the infection to clear. Her liver was failing too quickly.

A stealthy disease

On Friday, April 22, Baelyn woke up covered in itchy red welts. Her mom had seen it before: hives.

“She has a pretty long list of allergies,” Schwab said. “She’s always had a snotty nose, since the beginning of time.”

The family has been working with an allergist, so they took her to the doctor, who gave her a shot of epinephrine and sent her to the local emergency room for monitoring. The hives cleared up.

The next day, her mom thought she could see a little yellow in the whites of Baelyn’s eyes, but she chalked it up to the epinephrine.

On Sunday, she thought they were a little more yellow, and she texted a photo to her mother. “Do you see the yellow, or am I crazy?”

On Monday, her mother-in-law mentioned that Baelyn’s eyes looked yellow. “OK, I’m not crazy,” Schwab thought. She made a doctor’s appointment for the next day.

“She was still acting fine. She still acted perfectly healthy. Her skin wasn’t yellow, just her eyes,” Schwab said.

The doctor drew blood and, later that afternoon, called them with dire news.

“You have to get to the city now. You don’t have time to wait,” they were told.

They didn’t even have the five hours it takes to drive to Minneapolis. Schwab raced from work to the hospital, and the family was flown to the city by helicopter.

Just the day before, Schwab had been talking with her mother, a lab technician, about the mysterious cases of hepatitis that were being investigated in kids. She never imagined that Baelyn might be one of them.

Schwab and her husband, who doesn’t want to be named for this story, also have a 4-year-old daughter, Kennedy. They farm 1,000 acres in Aberdeen, South Dakota, where they grow hay and raise sheep. She used to travel to Fargo each week for a job managing dental offices, but she left that job recently because of a family tragedy.

In December, her youngest daughter, Laramie, died of sudden infant death syndrome just 12 days before her first birthday.

Then, tragedy seemed to compound itself.

Weeks after losing Laramie, Schwab went to the doctor with pain in her abdomen. She thought it was stress from grief, but it was her appendix. While she was recovering from surgery for that, the whole family got Covid-19 — possibly from Laramie’s funeral. Then, two of her husband’s grandparents died within weeks of each other.

“I think I’ve cried so much in the last five months, I don’t have any tears left,” Schwab said. “To be back in the hospital setting again, it’s like replaying in your head all day.”

Schwab shared photos and videos but asked that CNN not film Baelyn, who was taking powerful drugs to weaken her immune system and being weaned off painkillers. Her mother didn’t want the world to see feisty, independent Baelyn as weak and sick.

A lifesaving gift

The liver that saved Baelyn’s life came in a picnic cooler, packed in ice.

It had been drained of blood, washed and preserved in a solution. These preparations blanch the normally deep burgundy tissue to pale fleshy color that’s not quite tan and not quite pink. In the surgeon’s gloved hands, it could be mistaken for an uncooked chicken breast.

Although bioengineers have created machines that can temporarily take over the work of the heart, the lungs and even the kidneys, there is no device or procedure that can fill in for the liver. When it fails, patients need a transplant.

“The interesting thing about liver, it’s just such a humble organ,” said Dr. Heli Bhatt, a pediatric gastroenterologist at M Health Fairview Masonic Medical Center who is treating Baelyn.

It does its job without much fuss until it just can’t anymore. Bhatt says someone can lose a lot of liver tissue and not know until it’s almost too late.

When Baelyn came to the hospital, doctors did a liver biopsy to see the damage from the inside. They found something called precursor cells, a sign that the liver was trying to repair itself. They tried to buy Baelyn a little time to see if the organ might recover.

“Kids that present like that, a lot of times, do turn over within like two to three days and then do fine and not require a liver transplant,” Bhatt said.

They took her blood every four hours around the clock, watching for any change in her liver enzymes, her clotting factors, her ammonia levels.

But over the next few days, the numbers did not improve. They decided to put Baelyn on the transplant list and to screen her parents to see if they might be able to be living donors.

“She kept appearing really well, you know, till she was not well and needed to be intubated,” Bhatt said. “That’s the thing about the liver, that you need to have extremely low suspicion to be very carefully monitored in the hospital and sent to ICU at the first drop-off deterioration so that you can get the best care.”

Baelyn had been at the top of the transplant list for three days when the offer came for a liver from a 16-year-old in Texas. It was just in time.

Masonic dispatched a team, including a surgeon, to Texas. They removed the organ, turning one family’s heartbreak into another’s hope.

Hooking up the washing machine

Chinnakotla’s team carefully divided the liver, teasing apart its internal structures so it would be small enough to fit into a 2-year-old’s body and still work. They raced back to Minnesota.

Transplants are long, painstaking surgeries under even the best of circumstances. “With children, you get one good shot. So you want to do it slowly and carefully, at least that’s my philosophy,” Chinnakotla said.

When Chinnakotla explains liver transplants to patients, he tells them it’s like hooking up a washing machine: There are two hoses coming in, like one for the cold water and one for hot water, and a hose to drain fluid out.

The hot water hose is the hepatic artery that supplies blood to the liver and pancreas. He compares the cold water tube to the portal vein, which drains blood from the intestines. The drainage hose is a large vein called the inferior vena cava that carries filtered blood back to the heart, where it can be re-oxygenated.

He has to clamp off these vessels to stop the flow of blood, remove the old liver, replace it with the donor liver, reattach the blood vessels and finally — in a moment that always makes him hold his breath — release the clamps. It’s in that instant that he knows whether the operation was successful, if the liver once again flushes with color, back to its deep dark red.

When he opened Baelyn’s body, it was clear that her liver was heavily damaged. One side was bulbous and swollen, and there were dark areas of dead tissue. Under a microscope, doctors could see that much of the tissue was destroyed. Normal livers are spongy; Baelyn’s was tough and rubbery, another sign of disease.

There was also a surprise. Instead of one vessel supplying the liver with blood, there were two, each about half the normal size.

When he tried each of these smaller vessels to the new liver, it didn’t work. “There wasn’t enough flow,” he said. Finally, he used blood vessels harvested from the donor to create a special graft, or bridge, between the aorta and the liver.

“When I did that, it looked good,” he said.

Even the downsized liver was still too large for tiny Baelyn’s body, so Chinnakotla left her incision open, covered with mesh, for a day or two so her care team could check on the transplant more easily and drain the wound.

The operation lasted from 8 in the morning until 4:30 in the afternoon on May 5.

“She came back from surgery, and she wasn’t yellow anymore,” Schwab said. It was an astonishing change.

But Baelyn is not out of the woods and won’t really be for another year, Bhatt says.

She will stay in the hospital for at least two more months, her mom said. After that, she will be monitored frequently while her body and her new liver get used to each other.

The long road to recovery

Baelyn is awake. She is being weaned off the medications that control her pain. She is getting physical therapy to help restore the strength she lost from being in bed. Her doctors say she is recovering remarkably fast.

For the Schwabs, life is still minute-to-minute. They are managing with the help of friends and family and donations from a GoFundMe page for Baelyn.

“I think we tried our hardest to make sure we were sleeping. We definitely have not slept or ate since the transplant, just anticipating that something bad is going to happen or has happened,” Schwab said.

And they’re still working through some grief over the fact that their once-healthy rough-and-tumble 2-year-old needed a liver transplant at all.

Schwab hopes that by telling their story, they can help other families avoid the same fate.

“I really want to spread awareness about this because I don’t want another parent to be in this situation,” she said. “It’s terrifying. It’s horrible. It’s dramatic. And not very many families can handle the strain that this puts on them and emotionally, physically, mentally, financially.”

She wants people to watch for any symptoms — like any yellowing of the skin or eyes, dark urine, cloudy gray stool, fatigue, fever, nausea, vomiting or a loss of appetite — and take immediate action if they appear.

“I feel like if somebody would have done a story a couple months ago, I would have definitely jumped on it.”

Their doctors, though, say the family did everything right.

“Mom is a fighter, too,” Bhatt said. “She is an amazing advocate for Baelyn. She’s so attentive to all her care.”

“Going through your kid almost died and needed a transplant in such a short amount of time, and yet to understand all the medical stuff and ask good questions, it’s not something that I personally could have done,” Bhatt said. “Hats off to them.”

CNN’s Nadia Kounang contributed to this story.

Read original article here

16 Michigan counties at high community levels; CDC says mask up

More than half of all Michiganians live in counties where they should mask up indoors following a spike in COVID-19 cases, according to recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Across the state, 16 counties — including Wayne, Oakland, Macomb and many others near heavily-populated Metro Detroit — are now in “high” community levels, a CDC classification to show where COVID cases and hospitalizations have risen to the point that people are recommended to wear masks indoors. The city of Detroit is also at a high level, the city health department said.

Last week, only one county was considered to be at a high community level: Grand Traverse in the northern lower peninsula. Nearly every county spent most of April in the “low” category.

Another 28 counties are considered to be “medium” community levels, where people are advised to test for infections before socializing with those who may be more susceptible to severe COVID illness and to wear a mask around them. Those 28 counties account for another 30% of all Michiganians. 

The results come after Michigan added 27,705 cases of COVID and 76 deaths from the virus on Wednesday, including totals from the previous six days. The state reported an average of about 3,958 cases per day over the seven days, a 46% increase from 2,706 cases per day last week and the fifth straight week cases have risen.

After declining for nearly three months, hospitalization rates in Michigan also increased for the fifth straight week.

“It’s concerning to see this after we got all the way down to low and got great numbers,” said Dr. Russel Faust, medical director of the Oakland County Health Division.

It is still early in the uptick to say what the results will be, experts say. But it appears fewer patients are getting dangerously sick, and for those who are sick, treatments exist.

“Hospitals have been getting better at managing this,” Faust said.

Dr. Matthew Sims, director of infectious disease research for Beaumont Health, said that upticks tend to follow a particular pattern. First, community levels rise, followed by a rise in hospitalizations, and then, a few weeks later, a rise in deaths. He estimated that if home tests were taken into consideration, the entire state would be in a high community level.

“We’re certainly not at a crisis point,” said Sims, acknowledging the number of COVID patients he has seen in recent days has risen. “But we could be there in a few weeks if things don’t go well. We’re going to keep watching this and doing everything we can.” 

Case loads are better than they were in January, Faust said, when the first wave of the omicron variant rippled through the state and country. They’re worse than they were last summer, or even in March, but it seems so far that fewer people are getting seriously ill.

The downside of that is that “people have become more complacent,” Faust said.

“People who consider themselves more vulnerable, maybe because they’re older or they have other illnesses that would make them more susceptible, they’re still wearing masks,” he said. “But the majority of folks haven’t been wearing them, if you look around.”

That can help contribute to higher caseloads across Michigan. Masks are one of the most effective tools at limiting illness, he said, along with getting vaccinated, maintaining a safe distance from others and washing your hands properly for at least 20 seconds with soap.

“It’s the same old advice coming around again,” said Dr. Allison Weinmann, senior staff of infectious diseases at Henry Ford Health Systems, on Friday. 

When people ditch their masks or aren’t fully boosted against COVID, more people are potentially exposed to illness. Even a person who is a while off from their doses may be at higher risk of catching or spreading the virus, Weinmann said.

Current CDC guidelines recommend that a person get both doses of a two-shot regimen and a first booster at least five months after that second shoot. Those 50 and older or who are immunocompromised can also get a second booster “at least four months after the first.”

There are also new variants coming through, substrains of the omicron variant. A new iteration of the omicron variant, BA.2, is now the dominant across Michigan and the country. Viruses like COVID have to evolve to keep infecting new patients, and it is the most infectious ones that become dominant strains.

“People may not necessarily be getting worse infections, but those particular variants are better at being transmitted than the last variant,” Faust said. “That’s what we’ve been watching happen around the world with past variants, and that’s what is happening with the omicron subvariants.”

That helps to explain why more counties are reaching high community levels not just in Michigan but around the country. More than 4% of all counties in the U.S. are at a high level this week, compared with 2.45% last week. More counties have also hit the medium level — 14.2% of counties are considered medium community levels, compared with just under 10% last week.

But even with an increase, Faust said the situation still isn’t as bad as it has been during previous case spikes.

“At this point, a lot of people are fully vaccinated and boosted or have been infected previously, which gives them a level of immune response,” he said. It is nearly impossible to say how many people would actually have a level of immunity against the newest strain, Weinmann said.

But any immunity can make a difference. People are still getting sick, but that immune response means that viral levels aren’t getting as high as they would if someone were exposed for the first time. That in turn means that most people aren’t getting severely sick.

“People still die from it. We need to make that clear: This is still not a cold or a flu,” Faust said. “But immunity across the community is way up, and that means our hospitals aren’t filling up and people are able to get the treatment they need.”

Weinmann said it is possible things could change. The current rise in cases is still relatively new. Every individual still needs to estimate their own risk levels, she said, adding it’s “never a mistake to wear a mask.”

“We’re going to be in this for the long haul. We’re going to see surges, and we have a fear that the next variant is going to be more transmissible and more deadly,” she said. “We’re not going to get out of this quickly, so now our goal needs to be: ‘How can I prevent myself and others from getting sick?’ That is still what we need to be thinking about.”

It is possible that even people who have been infected with recent variants may become infected again, Sims said. Research out of South Africa has shown that even people who were infected with BA.1, the original omicron variant, might not have the needed immunity to avoid getting sick from BA.4 and BA.5, the most recent omicron subvariants identified.

Sims said he felt it was probably time that the CDC expand the pool of people who can get a second booster in order to keep people as safe as possible. He pointed to bivalent vaccines, like the one Moderna has been working on, as the likely next step in vaccinations. 

A bivalent vaccine is one that works against two different viruses (or, in the case of the new Moderna effort, multiple variants of the same virus). Many vaccines work that way, which is why flu shots change every year or why others, like pneumonia or HPV, have added additional strains over time.

Moderna’s new shot would target not only older COVID variants but also omicron variants specifically. The company said last month that initial results were promising, indicating that with additional research and federal approval, it could be used in the fall to protect against winter surges.

“We don’t have a magic bullet, some sort of medication that will save 90% of COVID patients, but we do have vaccines,” Sims said. “They are how you stay safe — you get vaccinated, you wear your mask in crowds, you protect yourself and everyone around you.”

hharding@detroitnews.com

Twitter: @Hayley__Harding



Read original article here

How to Know If You Have a Fear of Abandonment (and What to Do About It)

Photo: panitanphoto (Shutterstock)

It’s normal to feel a little uneasy or unsure about a new romantic interest or new friend. But if you find yourself overly concerned about being dumped and left behind by others, then you might have a fear of abandonment.

“Fear of abandonment is an all-consuming fear that people close to you might leave you,” says Dr. Nereida Gonzalez-Berrios, a certified psychiatrist. “You are in a state of constant anxiety that people around you are going away or you will be left alone, or isolated in a social structure.”

For example, says Gonzalez-Berrios, you may feel someone you love deeply will leave you and never come back. You might experience feelings of isolation and inability to connect with others emotionally because you are always overwhelmed with fear of being left alone, or you may feel emotionally neglected and not heard by people who matter the most in your life.

Fear of abandonment also symbolizes insecurity, poor self-image, and feelings of worthlessness, Dr. Gonzalez-Berrios says. While the condition isn’t classified as an official phobia, she notes the “worry seems to worsen over time” when left untreated.

So where does fear of abandonment come from, what are the signs, and what you can do about it?

Where does fear of abandonment come from?

Fear of abandonment is often rooted in some sort of attachment trauma that has made it difficult for you to trust others.

“[Fear of abandonment stems from] when someone you’re attached to, usually a parent during your early childhood, but not always, abandons you in some way,” says Brianna Sanders, a licensed professional counselor. “Whether they physically abandon you, emotionally neglect you, are present but harmful in some way that betrays your safety, or even if they die unexpectedly—these can all be forms of attachment trauma. From this traumatic event, your nervous system rewrites itself in a way that will allow you to minimize harm from future potential abandonment.”

These traumatic events can develop from losing a parent or partner through death or divorce, or suffering from a sort of betrayal from someone you trusted, resulting in a fear of being left.

How does fear of abandonment manifest?

Fear of abandonment can take on a variety of forms, and is usually linked to your attachment style in relationships. Sanders says this fear typically manifests itself in one of three ways: Anxious attachment, avoidant attachment, and fearful attachment.

Anxious attachers “are preoccupied with ensuring that their attachment needs will be met,” explains Sanders.This looks like constantly checking to make sure someone still likes you, easily noticing if someone’s communication patterns change or decrease, and feeling as though it is your responsibility to make sure that others do not leave at any cost. Without doing these things, you experience a lot of anxiety. The goal of anxious attachers is to maintain closeness, because closeness [equals] safety.”

Those with an avoidant attachment, “avoid becoming attached to others due to fear of abandonment,” says Sanders. “This looks like distancing yourself from people when you start to feel closer with them, avoiding vulnerability and keeping things surface-level, and needing a lot of space, especially in romantic relationships. The goal for avoidant attachers is to maintain independence because independence equals safety.”

People with a fearful attachment, “want to experience closeness and maintain their independence but are afraid of both,” Sanders says. “Usually fearful attachers’ caregivers were very unpredictable, so it is hard for them to feel safe in close relationships, but they also feel anxious without close relationships. Their actions may seem very confusing from the outside because they are unsure how to alleviate their fear of abandonment on the inside.”

According to Dr. Gonzalez-Berrios other signs of fear of abandonment include:

  • tries to connect quickly with unknown people
  • attention-seeking tendencies
  • no long term healthy relationships
  • nitpicky, blaming tendencies
  • never takes the responsibility for wrong behavior
  • feels hurt and distressed if left alone
  • feels jealous if anyone else talks to their loved ones
  • lack of trust in others
  • searches for hidden meaning in the behavior of their loved ones
  • lack of emotional control
  • constantly doubts relationship status
  • constant anxiety over potentially losing a partner, parent, friend, or a child

How to deal with a fear of abandonment

Because fear of abandonment usually stems from deep-seated insecurities and childhood trauma, Dr. Gonzalez-Berrios says it’s key to try to understand the roots of your trauma, preferably with the help of a therapist or counselor. Consider “why…you feel distressed, or what will happen if people leave you?” she says.When you are able to identify the worst-case scenarios, you’ll be able to face your fears boldly.”

Sanders says it’s also important to recognize that the things that you’re doing once kept you safe. “Extend gratitude to your defense mechanisms, and give them permission to leave you as you begin to create safety within.”

Another exercise to consider: Connect with the part of yourself that is afraid. “Notice how you speak to yourself now,” Sanders says. “Notice how it ingrains your current patterns and fear of abandonment. Notice where it comes from and how old you were when you learned to fear people leaving or emotionally neglecting you.

And finally, it’s crucial to create safety within. “Create an inner voice of the person you needed as a child to not abandon you,” Sanders says. “Speak to yourself as that person whenever you’re experiencing abandonment fears. Once you’re able to securely attach to yourself, [you can] heals the abandonment fear with consistency over time.”

The best way to do all of these things, according to Sanders, is through a regular meditation practice. “Just starting at five minutes a day and increasing to 15 minutes a day. If you’re a meditation beginner, there is no shame in using guided meditation. In fact I recommend it.”

Read original article here