Tag Archives: wsjfinance

Natural-Gas Prices Plunge as Unseasonably Warm Weather Is Forecast

A sudden thaw across the Northern Hemisphere has melted down natural-gas prices, upending dire forecasts of energy shortages and sinking Vladimir Putin’s plan to squeeze Europe this winter.

It isn’t expected to remain as balmy as it was on Wednesday, when temperatures hit 66-degrees Fahrenheit in New York, but the forecasts that energy traders monitor call for abnormally warm weather extending into February, sapping demand for the heating fuel.

U.S. natural-gas futures for February delivery ended Wednesday at $4.172 per million British thermal units. That is down 57% from the summer highs notwithstanding a 4.6% gain on Wednesday that snapped a four-session losing streak, including an 11% drop on Tuesday. 

The price is now about the same as it was a year ago, when temperatures were also warmer than normal and before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine jolted energy markets.

The plunge is a bad omen for drillers, whose shares were among the stock market’s few winners last year. Cheaper gas is good news for households and manufacturers whose budgets have been busted and profit margins pinched by high fuel prices. Though shocks of cold and problems with pipelines could still push up regional prices, less expensive natural gas should help to cool inflation in the months ahead. 

There are also major geopolitical implications. Mild weather is driving gas prices lower in Europe, too, spelling relief for the region that coming into the winter faced the possibility of rolling blackouts and factory shutdowns. The war threw energy markets into chaos, but benchmark European natural-gas prices are now less than half of what they were a month ago and lower than any point since the February invasion. 

The drop is a welcome surprise for European governments that committed hundreds of billions of dollars to shield consumers and companies from high energy prices. Moscow cut supplies of gas to Europe last year in what European officials described as an attempt to undermine military and financial support for Kyiv.

So far, Russia’s strategy isn’t working. Warm weather is limiting demand, as is a European Union-led effort to curb consumption. But analysts say prices in Europe could shoot up again when the continent tries to refill stores for the 2023-24 winter without much Russian gas.

PHOTOS: How a 102-Year-Old Maritime Law Affects Today’s Home-Heating Prices

Besides being burned to heat roughly half of American homes, natural gas is used for cooking, along with making electricity, plastic, fertilizer, steel and glass. Last year’s high prices were a big driver of the steepest inflation in four decades.

When prices peaked in August, the question was whether there would be enough gas to get through the winter, given record consumption by domestic power producers with few alternatives, as well as demand in Europe, where the race is on to replace Russian gas.

Now the question in the market is how low prices will go.  

They were already falling when the late-December storm brought snow to northern cities and stranded travelers. Frigid temperatures prompted a big draw from U.S. natural-gas stockpiles and froze wells in North Dakota and Oklahoma. At its peak, the storm took nearly 21% of U.S. gas supply offline, according to East Daley Analytics, a gas consulting firm.  

The demand surge and the supply disruptions were fleeting and failed to counteract forecasts for balmy January weather. Prices were also pushed lower by another delay in the restart of a Texas export facility. It has been offline since a June fire left a lot of gas in the domestic market that would have otherwise been shipped overseas. 

Temperatures above 60 degrees Fahrenheit are forecast this week around the Great Lakes and along the Ohio Valley, while highs in the Southeast might reach into the 80s.

As measured in heating-degree days, a population-weighted measure of temperatures below 65 degrees Fahrenheit, this week will be twice as warm relative to normal as the last week of December was cold, said Eli Rubin, senior energy analyst at the gas-trading firm EBW AnalyticsGroup.

The firm estimates that warmer weather over the first half of January will reduce gas demand by about 100 billion cubic feet over that stretch. That is about the volume of gas that the U.S. produces each day. The Energy Information Administration estimates that daily American output hit a record in 2022.

Analysts anticipate similarly strong production in 2023. They expect the year to pass without new LNG export capacity coming online for the first time since 2016, when the U.S. began to ship liquefied natural gas abroad from the Lower 48 States. 

“The market is moving from a mind-set of winter scarcity to looking ahead to exiting winter with more in storage, adding production and not adding any new LNG exports,” Mr. Rubin said. “If anything, the market looks oversupplied.” 

Analysts have been reducing their gas-price assumptions as well as their outlooks for producers as the first weeks of winter pass without sustained periods of cold weather. 

Gabriele Sorbara, an analyst at Siebert Williams Shank, told clients this week that he expected natural gas to average $4.25 in 2023, down from a forecast of $5.50 before the warm spell. As a result, he downgraded shares of

EQT Corp.

, the biggest U.S. producer and one of the top-performing stocks in the S&P 500 last year, from buy to hold. 

“EQT will be dead money until estimates recalibrate and there is visibility of a rebound in natural-gas prices,” he wrote in a note to clients.  

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

What price changes are you seeing in your natural-gas bill this winter? Join the conversation below.

Hedge funds and other speculators have, on balance, been bearish on natural-gas prices since the summer, maintaining more wagers on falling prices than on gains, according to Commodity Futures Trading Commission data. Analysts said that is probably the safe bet. 

“We continue to caution against any attempts to time a price bottom,” the trading firm Ritterbusch & Associates told clients this week. 

—Joe Wallace contributed to this article.

Write to Ryan Dezember at ryan.dezember@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Bankrupt FTX Fires Three of Sam Bankman-Fried’s Top Deputies

FTX, the cryptocurrency exchange launched by

Sam Bankman-Fried,

said it fired three of the founder’s top deputies.

Gary Wang, an FTX co-founder and its chief technology officer; FTX engineering director Nishad Singh; and Caroline Ellison, who ran Mr. Bankman-Fried’s trading arm, Alameda Research, were terminated from those roles after FTX tapped

John J. Ray

to oversee the companies’ bankruptcy, an FTX spokeswoman said late Friday.

Mr. Bankman-Fried resigned on Nov. 11, when FTX filed for bankruptcy. He was replaced by Mr. Ray, a veteran restructuring executive who once oversaw the liquidation of Enron Corp. 

FTX and Alameda sought protection from creditors after executives at both businesses revealed that FTX had lent billions of dollars worth of customer assets to Alameda to plug a funding gap, The Wall Street Journal previously reported. In a Thursday court filing, Mr. Ray highlighted numerous failings, including “the concentration of control in the hands of a very small group of inexperienced, unsophisticated and potentially compromised individuals.” 

On a Nov. 9 video call with Alameda employees, Ms. Ellison said that she, along with Messrs. Bankman-Fried, Wang and Singh, were aware of the decision to send customer money to the trading firm, the Journal previously reported. 

The four executives also comprised the board of what they called the Future Fund, a philanthropic arm charged with making grants to nonprofits and investments in “socially-impactful companies.”

Messrs. Bankman-Fried, Wang and Singh all owned stakes in at least some of the FTX companies, according to Mr. Ray’s court filing.

“Mr. Bankman-Fried ultimately agreed to resign, resulting in my appointment as the debtors’ CEO,” Mr. Ray wrote in the filing. “I was delegated all corporate powers and authority under applicable law, including the power to appoint independent directors and commence these Chapter 11 cases on an emergency basis.” 

Write to Justin Baer at justin.baer@wsj.com and Hannah Miao at hannah.miao@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Alameda, FTX Executives Are Said to Have Known FTX Was Using Customer Funds

FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried appeared at a Senate committee hearing earlier this year on cryptocurrencies.



Photo:

Sarah Silbiger/Bloomberg News

Alameda Research’s chief executive and senior FTX officials knew that FTX had lent its customers’ money to Alameda to help it meet its liabilities, according to people familiar with the matter.

Alameda’s troubles helped lead to the bankruptcy of FTX, the crypto exchange founded by

Sam Bankman-Fried.

Alameda is a trading firm also founded and owned by Mr. Bankman-Fried.

In a video meeting with Alameda employees late Wednesday Hong Kong time, Alameda CEO

Caroline Ellison

said that she, Mr. Bankman-Fried and two other FTX executives,

Nishad Singh

and

Gary Wang,

were aware of the decision to send customer funds to Alameda, according to people familiar with the video. Mr. Singh was FTX’s director of engineering and a former Facebook employee. Mr. Wang, who previously worked at Google, was the chief technology officer of FTX and co-founded the exchange with Mr. Bankman-Fried.

Alameda faced a barrage of demands from lenders after crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital collapsed in June, creating losses for crypto brokers such as

Voyager Digital Ltd.

, the people said.

Ms. Ellison said on the call that FTX used customer money to help Alameda meet its liabilities, the people said.

On Friday, FTX, Alameda, FTX US and other FTX affiliates filed for bankruptcy protection.

Bankruptcy means that it could be a long time before individual investors and others owed their funds are able to potentially recover any of them, if ever.

Ms. Ellison didn’t return a phone message and an email seeking comment. Messrs. Singh and Wang didn’t respond to multiple messages seeking comment. Ryne Miller, FTX US’s chief legal officer, declined to comment.

Cryptocurrency platform FTX filed for chapter 11 on Friday and CEO Sam Bankman-Fried resigned. WSJ’s Vicky Ge Huang explains what happened to the company and what this could mean for investors. Photo: Olivier Douliery/AFP

Write to Dave Michaels at dave.michaels@wsj.com, Elaine Yu at elaine.yu@wsj.com and Caitlin Ostroff at caitlin.ostroff@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

FTX Files for Bankruptcy, CEO Sam Bankman-Fried Resigns

Beleaguered cryptocurrency platform FTX filed for bankruptcy protection Friday, and Chief Executive

Sam Bankman-Fried

resigned.

FTX and a bevy of affiliates said they had more than 100,000 creditors and tens of billions of dollars in assets and liabilities. It is the largest crypto-related bankruptcy ever, and a demise remarkable for its swiftness as well as its size.

Just a week ago, FTX was an industry titan, and Mr. Bankman-Fried its smiling public face. In January, FTX raised money from Silicon Valley’s most sophisticated investors, at a valuation of $32 billion. A few weeks ago, Mr. Bankman-Fried was publicly musing about raising more, to get even bigger.

That is all gone. The bankruptcy will likely wipe out billions of equity value, leaving investors including Sequoia Capital and Thoma Bravo with stiff losses. It will maroon the crypto and cash deposits belonging to a legion of customers. FTX faces investigations or asset freezes from regulators and prosecutors around the world.

It has also rattled the crypto world. Crypto lender BlockFi, which had obtained a financial lifeline from FTX in July—one of several companies FTX had rescued earlier in the year—paused withdrawals Thursday evening.

Among the affiliates filing for bankruptcy protection is FTX US, a smaller unit that operated in the U.S. Most of FTX’s business was offshore. FTX and its affiliates filed in federal bankruptcy court in Delaware, where the U.S. unit is registered.

Thursday morning, Mr. Bankman-Fried said the troubles at FTX were confined to its international operations. He tweeted that FTX US “was not financially impacted” and that “every user could fully withdraw.” Later that day, FTX US said it might stop trading. On Friday, FTX US filed for bankruptcy along with the rest of FTX.

Bitcoin slipped after the announcement to trade near $16,500.

At issue in the bankruptcy proceedings and the investigations is to determine what happened to the billions that FTX raised, that its customers deposited, and that it earned from operating what appeared—for a time—to be a successful cryptocurrency exchange.

FTX in 2021 also paid $250 million—a quarter of its revenue that year—to a “related party” for software royalties, according to documents viewed by The Wall Street Journal.

Mr. Bankman-Fried wrote on Twitter roughly an hour after the bankruptcy announcement that he was “shocked to see things unravel the way they did earlier this week.”

FTX’s troubles began last weekend, after rival exchange Binance said it would sell its holdings of an FTX equity-like token—spooked by a CoinDesk report showed the depth of the relationship between FTX and Alameda.

John J. Ray

III has been named the new CEO of FTX Group, the company said. The bankruptcy filing includes FTX Trading Ltd., the company presiding over the global trading website FTX.com, and Alameda Research, a trading firm founded by Mr. Bankman-Fried, in addition to FTX US.

Mr. Ray was chairman of Enron Corp.’s successor company, Enron Creditors Recovery Corp., and oversaw the energy-trading company’s liquidation after it filed for bankruptcy in late 2001. The recovery rate for Enron creditors as of 2008 was about 52 cents on the dollar, the company said at the time. Mr. Ray’s successes included securing a $1.7 billion settlement with

Citigroup

in 2008. He had accused the bank of helping Enron mislead investors.

Other noteworthy bankruptcy cases in which Mr. Ray served in similar roles include Nortel Networks Inc., Fruit of the Loom and

Overseas Shipholding Group Inc.

In the petition, Mr. Bankman-Fried said that

Stephen Neal

would be appointed as the chairman of the board of FTX Group if he is willing to serve. He also said that he is being advised by the law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP.

FTX is the latest in a string of crypto companies seeking bankruptcy protection this year.



Photo:

Leon Neal/Getty Images

Bankruptcy means that it could be a long time before retail traders and others owed their funds are able to potentially recover any of them, if ever. Creditors to Mt. Gox, the Japanese crypto exchange that failed following a 2014 hack, are still waiting for their funds almost a decade later.

The collapse in digital-currency prices earlier this year triggered a rash of crypto-related bankruptcy filings, including Celsius Network LLC,

Voyager Digital Ltd.

and Three Arrows Capital.

Crypto investors may be confronted with an uphill battle to get their crypto deposits back in bankruptcy proceedings because their investments are likely to be treated as unsecured claims without collateral rights.

FTX’s bankruptcy also calls into question the fate of Voyager Digital. In September, the firm won the auction to buy the bankrupt lender’s assets with a purchase price of about $50 million, The Wall Street Journal has reported.

Voyager said Friday that the firm has reopened the bidding process for the company and is in active discussions with potential buyers. Voyager said it didn’t transfer any assets to FTX US, which previously submitted a $5 million good-faith deposit as part of the auction process. The funds are held in escrow, according to Voyager.

Voyager also recalled loans from Alameda Research for 6,500 bitcoin and 50,000 ether. The company currently has no loans outstanding with any borrower, it said. However, Voyager had about $3 million worth of cryptocurrencies stuck on FTX at the time of its bankruptcy filing.

contributed to this article.

Write to Caitlin Ostroff at caitlin.ostroff@wsj.com and Alexander Gladstone at alexander.gladstone@wsj.com

Corrections & Amplifications
Sam Bankman-Fried said he is being advised by the law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP. An earlier version of this article incorrectly said FTX was being advised by the law firm. (Corrected on Nov. 11)

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

First Came the Crypto Crash. Now Comes the Taxman.

The rout in cryptocurrencies worsened this week with the collapse of the offshore exchange FTX. With bitcoin recently down more than 60% in 2022, many crypto investors would surely like to forget about digital assets, at least for now.

That would be a mistake. The Internal Revenue Service hasn’t lost interest in cryptocurrencies, and investors need to focus on key tax issues before year-end. 

New rules and enforcement actions are coming to ferret out crypto transactions that often went unreported in the past. There’s a bit of good news as well: This year’s painful selloff brings an opportunity for crypto holders to harvest losses to offset future taxes. 

Here’s more to help investors make smart crypto moves in the next few weeks—and get ready for new IRS scrutiny.  

Crypto losses as a tax-saving tool

There’s a silver lining for investors whose crypto holdings are in taxable accounts rather than tax sheltered accounts such as IRAs.   

The benefit is that if an investor sells this crypto and books a capital loss, it can be used to offset future capital gains on winners. These gains don’t have to be on digital assets; they could be on stocks, real estate, or other investments.

If an investor with capital losses has no capital gains to shelter, the losses can offset up to $3,000 of ordinary income such as wages per tax return, per year. These losses don’t expire.  

Say that John has a $20,000 loss in his crypto holdings now. If he sells and has no capital gains to offset, he can reduce his wage income by $3,000 this year and in future years. If he then has a capital gain of $5,000 two years from now, he won’t owe tax on it—and he’ll still have $9,000 to offset future taxes. 

In a key way, crypto losses have an advantage over stock losses. If an investor sells shares at a loss, the “wash-sale” rules penalize him if he also buys the same stock within 30 days before or after the sale.  

But the wash-sale rules don’t currently apply to cryptocurrencies. So crypto investors can have their cake and eat it too, by taking losses now to shelter future gains and then repurchasing favorites right away. There’s no need to wait and risk missing a market surge—if there is one. 

New IRS reporting by brokers

The 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act included a provision requiring crypto brokers to report customers’ sale proceeds to the IRS on a 1099 form, if it’s held in a taxable account. The requirements are akin to what brokerage firms report for investors’ stock sales.

The change aims to clamp down on many crypto investors’ cavalier—and sometimes criminal—tax avoidance. Until Congress acted, few crypto transactions had to be reported to the IRS by third parties such as exchanges, and many investors have ignored crypto tax rules. In a recent court filing, the IRS said that in 2019 only about 100,000 tax returns reported crypto transactions. That’s far less than would be expected given research showing that about 20% of American adults have bought, traded, or used cryptocurrencies.   

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Have you been contacted by the IRS about your cryptocurrency holdings? Join the conversation below.

The new law is set to take effect Jan. 1, 2023, so the first forms would go to taxpayers and the IRS in early 2024. However, tax specialists say the date may be postponed because the Treasury Department hasn’t issued regulations detailing the laws defining thorny issues such as who is a crypto broker. Crypto firms also need to update software.  

The new rules will likely increase complexity, even for crypto investors complying with the law—so it could make sense to accelerate moves into this year. More paperwork will likely lead to more errors by taxpayers and the IRS that take time to untangle, says Shehan Chandrasekera, head of tax strategy at CoinTracker, a provider of crypto tax-filing software.   

For crypto holders who aren’t compliant, he adds, “The new reporting doesn’t change the taxation of cryptocurrencies. But it will tell the IRS about your transactions—so it’s important to put things in order now.”    

 New court-ordered searches for crypto tax cheats 

In August and September federal judges approved two new summonses requiring a crypto exchange and a bank to turn over customer information to the IRS to uncover tax cheating using cryptocurrency.

The crypto exchange is sFox, a crypto prime dealer with more than 175,000 customers whose transactions have totaled more than $12 billion since 2015, according to a Justice Department statement. The bank is M.Y. Safra Bank, which had an agreement to provide banking services to sFox customers. Neither business is accused of wrongdoing.

sFox and M.Y. Safra must turn over to the IRS account information on sFox customers who had $20,000 or more in crypto transactions in any one year from Jan. 1, 2016 to Dec. 31, 2021. 

To justify the summonses, the agency provided examples of 10 unnamed people who didn’t declare taxable income from transactions conducted largely through sFox. The unreported income ranged from $1 million by someone allegedly involved in a Ponzi scheme to $5,000 by someone whose return showed wages, retirement income, and Social Security payments—but no crypto profits. 

The IRS has already used this strategy, called a John Doe summons, to pursue crypto tax cheats with transactions of $20,000 or more at three other exchanges:

Coinbase,

Kraken and Circle. From these and other efforts, the agency has assessed more than $110 million in tax due on unreported crypto income, with more expected. Penalties and interest could nearly double the total that some taxpayers owe. 

Future summonses are likely, says Don Fort, a former chief of IRS criminal investigations now with the Kostelanetz law firm: “The IRS and Justice Department have become adept at tailoring requests judges will approve.”  

The IRS’s dogged pursuit of past cases is a reminder to investors with unreported crypto income that it may not stay hidden—and the consequences could be severe. 

Write to Laura Saunders at Laura.Saunders@wsj.com

Corrections & Amplifications
Taxpayers who have no taxable capital gains can deduct up to $3,000 of capital losses against ordinary income such as wages. An earlier version of the story incorrectly said the deduction would reduce income tax, not income. (Corrected on Nov. 11)

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Dow Surges 900 Points in Volatile Trading

U.S. stocks turned sharply higher Thursday, a head-spinning reversal after major indexes spent much of the morning deep in negative territory.

Stocks tumbled in early trading after new data showed that inflation remains persistently high, strengthening expectations for continued large interest-rate increases from the Federal Reserve. At their lows, the Nasdaq Composite had fallen more than 3%, the S&P 500 had dropped more than 2%, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average had declined nearly 2%, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

The morning’s declines followed what had been a dismal stretch for stocks. The S&P 500 on Wednesday fell for the sixth day in a row, hitting its lowest closing level since November 2020.

Traders appeared to decide that the selling had gone too far. Stocks pared their losses throughout the morning, then turned green shortly after 11 a.m. The S&P 500 recently was up 2.8% while the Dow industrials were up about 3%, or about 900 points. The Nasdaq Composite advanced 2.3%.

“What the market is experiencing is the influences of a lot of short-term traders,” said Tom Galvin, chief investment officer at wealth management firm City National Rochdale. While some traders dumped stocks after the inflation data, “once they were done selling, I think markets started to stabilize.”

The turn higher came as a relief after another punishing span in the markets.

The Nasdaq Composite, like the S&P 500, closed lower on Wednesday for a sixth consecutive trading day. On Tuesday those losses tipped the tech-heavy equities gauge into a bear market—Wall Street parlance for a decline of 20% or more from a recent peak—for the second time this year.

Still, such heart-stopping moves—sharp gains as well as steep drops—can be a sign of trouble. Markets were rocked by similar gyrations as they tumbled early in the pandemic.

Investors have been fixated on any signals about the path of inflation and the trajectory of the Federal Reserve’s campaign to tame the price increases by raising interest rates. Rising rates put pressure on the valuations that investors are willing to pay for stocks, while also raising concerns about companies’ future earnings.

Earlier Thursday, new data from the Labor Department showed that a reading of U.S. consumer inflation excluding volatile energy and food prices accelerated to a new four-decade high. The so-called core measure of the consumer-price index gained 6.6% in September from a year earlier, the biggest increase since August 1982.

The overall consumer-price index, meanwhile, increased 8.2% in September from the same month a year ago, down from 8.3% in August and 9.1% in June.

That move lower could be welcome news for investors looking to justify buying back into a stock market that is trading much more cheaply than in the recent past.

“The fact that you’re seeing some peaking out in inflation to where maybe we just don’t have to fight the Fed so much, people will feel comfortable buying in at these levels,” said Dan Genter, chief executive and chief investment officer at Genter Capital Management.

Investors have debated whether signs of stress creeping into some markets might cause the Fed to slow its pace of interest-rate increases. Volatility in U.K. government-bond markets, following government plans for large, debt-funded tax cuts, has sparked margin calls for pension funds and rippled into U.S. junk-debt markets. 

Mortgage rates hit a 20-year high on Thursday, a development that is likely to add to the pressure on the cooling housing market, potentially accelerating the shakeout of this cyclical industry.

Federal Reserve officials expressed concern at their meeting last month over the persistence of high inflation. They revised higher their expectations for rate increases, though some signaled caution about overdoing them amid risks of economic and financial volatility. The International Monetary Fund has warned that global central banks’ moves to quickly raise interest rates have fueled increased risks to the financial system.

A series of interest-rate rises have rippled through the U.S. economy, and more are projected to be on the way. WSJ breaks down the numbers hitting Americans’ wallets this year and beyond. Photo: Elise Amendola/Associated Press

“Market volatility and financial stability is something we’re following closely,” said

Carsten Brzeski,

ING Groep’s

global head of macro research, adding that the fast rise in interest rates “is clearly a potential risk.” 

Additional data from the Labor Department showed that 228,000 Americans applied for unemployment benefits in the week ended Oct. 8, up from 219,000 the week prior.

In bond markets, the yield on the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury note rose to 3.939% from 3.901% Wednesday, reversing earlier losses ahead of the inflation data. Yields and prices move inversely. 

In energy markets, Brent crude, the international benchmark for oil prices, rose 2.3% to $94.57 a barrel. 

Overseas, the pan-continental Stoxx Europe 600 rose 0.8%.

Traders worked on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange last week.



Photo:

BRENDAN MCDERMID/REUTERS

In Asia, major indexes closed with losses. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng fell 1.9% and South Korea’s Kospi declined 1.8%. Japan’s Nikkei 225 and China’s Shanghai Composite edged down 0.6% and 0.3%, respectively.

Write to Caitlin Ostroff at caitlin.ostroff@wsj.com and Karen Langley at karen.langley@wsj.com

We want to hear from you

By submitting your response to this questionnaire, you consent to Dow Jones processing your special categories of personal information and are indicating that your answers may be investigated and published by The Wall Street Journal and you are willing to be contacted by a Journal reporter to discuss your answers further. In an article on this subject, the Journal will not attribute your answers to you by name unless a reporter contacts you and you provide that consent.

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Dow Slips Again After Entering Bear Market

The Dow industrials and the S&P 500 fell again Tuesday as investors parsed a spate of economic data and comments from Federal Reserve officials.

All three indexes spent much of the morning in the green, but it didn’t last. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, which entered a bear market on Monday, fell 125.82 points, or 0.4%, to 29134.99. That marked its sixth consecutive day in the red.

The broad S&P 500 slipped 7.75 points, or 0.2%, to 3647.29, closing at its lowest level of the year for the second day in a row. The S&P is also now down for six days in a row, its longest losing streak since February 2020, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

The technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite rose 26.58 points, or 0.2%, to 10829.50.

Tuesday’s declines prolong a brutal year for financial markets. Stocks and bonds have both dropped sharply this year, an unusual tandem that reflects just how unnerved many investors feel. The Dow, the S&P and the Nasdaq are all on pace for their worst first nine months of a year since 2002.

Stubbornly high inflation has roiled markets since the start of the year. The Federal Reserve in response has been raising interest rates to try to cool the economy, stoking fears that the central bank will tip the U.S. into recession. Some investors hoped this summer that the rate increases might be coming to an end, and stocks rebounded briefly. Now, investors are coming to grips with the idea that bigger interest-rate increases—and weaker global economic growth—are here to stay for quite a while.

Neel Kashkari,

president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, reaffirmed the central bank’s resolve to bring down persistent and elevated inflation in a Tuesday interview with The Wall Street Journal. “There’s a lot of tightening in the pipeline,” Mr. Kashkari said, adding that the Fed is “committed to restoring price stability” but also recognizes “there is a risk of overdoing it.” 

A sharp rise in interest rates has been weighing on stocks, said

Mimi Duff,

managing director at GenTrust, a registered investment adviser with about $3 billion in assets. “I think we need to start seeing the rates stabilize before we can bottom out in equities,” she added. 

As markets react to interest-rate hikes and the threat of a recession, stocks have entered bear-market territory. WSJ’s Gunjan Banerji explains what it takes to push stocks back into a bull market and why it is hard to predict when they’ll turn around. Illustration: Jacob Reynolds

“The equity market is paying attention to this perpetual ratcheting higher of terminal rates in the U.S.,” said

Charles Diebel,

head of fixed income at Mediolanum International Funds. “The more the terminal rate goes up—while necessary to deal with the inflation threat—the bigger the economic downturn will be.”

On the economic front, data Tuesday showed that companies reduced durable goods orders for a second straight month. Home prices continued to notch big year-over-year gains, but the pace of that growth slowed. Home prices fell month over month.

However, consumers are growing more optimistic about the U.S. economy. The Conference Board’s consumer-confidence index increased in September for the second month in a row, lifted in part by falling gas prices.

Bond prices continued to fall, pushing up yields. The yield on the 10-year Treasury rose to 3.963%, once again hitting its highest level since 2010.

Traders worked on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange on Monday.



Photo:

REUTERS

Oil prices rebounded after slumping Monday to their lowest level since January. Brent crude, the international oil benchmark, rose 2.6% to $86.27 a barrel. 

Global stock markets were mixed. The Stoxx Europe 600 edged down 0.1%.

In Asia, stocks closed mostly higher. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index rose 0.5% while China’s Shanghai Composite rose 1.4%. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index ended the day close to flat.

Write to Will Horner at william.horner@wsj.com

We want to hear from you

By submitting your response to this questionnaire, you consent to Dow Jones processing your special categories of personal information and are indicating that your answers may be investigated and published by The Wall Street Journal and you are willing to be contacted by a Journal reporter to discuss your answers further. In an article on this subject, the Journal will not attribute your answers to you by name unless a reporter contacts you and you provide that consent.

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Avaya’s Collapsing Debt Deal Hits Clients of Goldman, JPMorgan

The two banks sold new loans and bonds for Avaya, a cloud-communications company, in late June. Investors included Brigade Capital Management LP and Symphony Asset Management LLC, people familiar with the matter said.

A few weeks later, Avaya announced that it would miss by more than 60% its previous forecasts for adjusted earnings in the third quarter, which ended June 30. It gave no explanation. The company also said that it would miss revenue targets and announced it was removing its chief executive officer.

Prices of the newly issued debt plummeted, hitting investors who lent Avaya the money with paper losses exceeding $100 million, according to analyst commentary and data from MarketAxess and Advantage Data Inc.

Avaya said Tuesday that it “has determined that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.” It also said that the audit committee of the board of directors had opened an internal investigation “to review the circumstances surrounding” the most recent quarter. The committee is also investigating a whistleblower letter, but it didn’t give details.

Avaya also tapped law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP and turnaround adviser AlixPartners LLP as it considers its options, The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday.

New CEO

Alan Masarek

held an abbreviated conference call Tuesday to discuss third-quarter earnings and declined to take questions from Wall Street analysts. Mr. Masarek attributed Avaya’s poor performance in part to clients signing up for smaller and shorter software subscription contracts than expected, potentially out of fear about the company’s debt load.

“I understand very clearly that there is disappointment, there’s worry, there’s concern out there across effectively all Avaya stakeholders,” Mr. Masarek said. “I’m going to thank you in advance for your patience… Give us some time to demonstrate a better future.”

Avaya’s 6.125% bond due 2028 fell as low as 48.50 cents on the dollar after the presentation, down from a close of 56.25 cents on Monday, according to data from MarketAxess.

Some analysts were already skeptical of Avaya’s financial forecasts.

“Why [are] your projections always faltering when you report quarterly results? Why can’t you have a stable outlook?” asked

Hamed Khorsand,

an analyst at BWS Financial, after the company’s last quarterly earnings report in May. Avaya undershot that quarter’s adjusted-earnings targets by about 10%.

Avaya’s former CEO Jim Chirico, applauding at the company’s stock listing in 2018, was removed last month.



Photo:

Richard Drew/Associated Press

Then-CEO

Jim Chirico

attributed the fumble to Avaya’s adoption of a new sales strategy that forced the company to recognize revenue more slowly. “We believe we’re over that hurdle,” he said at the time.

Avaya emerged as a telecommunications-equipment supplier to corporations in 2000, when it spun out of Lucent Technologies. Private-equity firms TPG and Silver Lake Partners bought the company in 2007, but it struggled to transition from selling hardware to selling software, and with servicing debt from the buyout. The company filed for bankruptcy protection a decade later before reorganizing. Mr. Chirico took the helm in 2017 and shifted to developing cloud-based software for enterprises.

“Avaya squandered a lot of money and time and has little to show for it,” independent enterprise communications analyst Dave Michels wrote in a recent report. “Many of us have wondered why the board didn’t act sooner—years sooner.”

A spokeswoman for Avaya declined to comment on analysts’ critiques.

The financial crunch hit this spring when Avaya’s cash reserves shrank to $324 million—down from almost $600 million a year earlier, according to company filings. The company tried to raise new debt to refinance a $350 million convertible bond that was coming due in 2023, according to company filings.

Goldman initially proposed a $500 million loan with a 12.6% yield but found few buyers, according to data provider LevFin Insights. The bank ultimately placed a $350 million secured loan yielding 15.5% with investors. Lenders included Symphony, which has invested in Avaya since before its bankruptcy, the people familiar with the matter said.

Avaya approached JPMorgan in late June to raise additional funds, according to one of the people. The bank placed a $250 million secured convertible bond. Investors included Brigade, the people said.

During the marketing process, Avaya executives told lenders that the company was on track to hit its earnings guidance, some of the people familiar with the matter said.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Should companies return capital raised shortly before large earnings misses? Why or why not? Join the conversation below.

The company had set Ebitda guidance of about $145 million for the quarter ended June 30 but cut that to between $50 million and $55 million on July 28. (Ebitda refers to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.) Avaya reported $54 million of Ebitda for the quarter on Tuesday, a figure that barely covers the quarterly interest expenses it disclosed in recent earnings reports.

“It is a surprising outcome for a company that priced $600 million of fresh capital…just four weeks ago,” said

Lance Vitanza,

a stock analyst at Cowen Inc. “It may be too late to accomplish much without radically restructuring Avaya’s balance sheet.”

The newly issued loans were quoted around 65 cents on the dollar Tuesday, down from 87 cents in late July, according to Advantage Data. The new convertible bond is likely to trade at similar prices in the near future, Mr. Vitanza said.

Losses have been heavier for owners of Avaya stock, which fell to as low as 82 cents last week from around $2.50 in early July and about $10 at the start of May. Avaya shares fell 46% Tuesday to 61 cents.

Alexander Gladstone and Andrew Scurria contributed to this article.

Write to Matt Wirz at matthieu.wirz@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Senate Plan Would Put Bitcoin, Ether Under Commodity Regulator’s Watch

WASHINGTON—Leaders of a Senate committee are pitching legislation that would assign oversight of the two largest cryptocurrencies, bitcoin and ether, to the federal agency that regulates milk futures and interest-rate swaps.

Senate Agriculture Committee Chairwoman Debbie Stabenow (D., Mich.) and top-ranking Republican John Boozman of Arkansas unveiled a plan Wednesday that would empower the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to regulate spot markets for digital commodities, a newly created asset class. Currently the CFTC has authority to police derivatives, such as futures and swaps, rather than underlying commodities.

The bill marks the latest salvo in an intensifying battle among federal agencies and congressional committees that oversee them over who will regulate crypto. Thirteen years after bitcoin was created, cryptocurrencies remain largely unregulated by the federal government, leaving investors without key protections from fraud and market manipulation.

The competition for jurisdiction heated up in recent months as a meltdown in crypto markets underscored the need for guardrails in the eyes of many policy makers. The competition also reflects the industry’s ramped-up lobbying presence in Washington and its push to reach more mainstream investors through Super Bowl ads and other high-profile marketing initiatives.

‘When there’s a topic as hot as crypto, everybody wants a seat at the table.’


— Aaron Klein, Brookings Institution senior fellow

“When there’s a topic as hot as crypto, everybody wants a seat at the table,” said

Aaron Klein,

a senior fellow at Brookings Institution who focuses on financial regulation. “The question is, are we going to have regulatory turf paralysis?”

In practical terms, for federal agencies such as the CFTC, Securities and Exchange Commission, and Federal Reserve, adding crypto to their remit would bring bigger budgets, greater influence and more job opportunities for officials who leave public service. For members of the congressional committees that oversee such regulators, a new industry in their sandbox would create another stream of lobbyists and campaign donations.

“We need to treat this seriously and take our responsibilities seriously for protecting consumers,” Ms. Stabenow said in a virtual press conference alongside Mr. Boozman.

Washington has introduced a flurry of bills in recent months to draw jurisdictional lines. Sens.

Cynthia Lummis

(R., Wyo.) and

Kirsten Gillibrand

(D., N.Y.) unveiled a proposal in June that would create exemptions for cryptocurrencies in securities laws, banking statutes and tax code. In July, leaders of the House Financial Services Committee said they were working on a bill to grant the Federal Reserve a greater role in regulating some stablecoins, crypto tokens pegged against the dollar and other official currencies.

When cryptocurrency lending platform Celsius froze user accounts amid a plunge in valuations, it sent ripples across the industry and raised questions about what happens to user assets if a crypto platform files for bankruptcy. WSJ’s Vicky Ge Huang explains. Photo illustration: Jordan Kranse

Agencies also are seeking to claim territory. CFTC Chairman

Rostin Behnam,

a former staffer to Ms. Stabenow, said last week his agency is “ready and well situated” to oversee spot markets for some cryptocurrencies. He has worked with his former boss for months to help craft legislation that would authorize the CFTC to do so, people familiar with the matter say.

Meanwhile, SEC Chairman

Gary Gensler

has repeatedly demanded that cryptocurrency-trading platforms such as

Coinbase Global Inc.

register with the agency as securities exchanges akin to the New York Stock Exchange or Nasdaq. In May, the SEC nearly doubled the staff of an enforcement unit focused on cryptocurrencies.

“Four years ago when I started this job, there were some people that just thought this thing was all going to blow up and go away, that this was sort of a passing fad,” said Kristin Smith, executive director of the Blockchain Association, a trade group representing crypto firms.

Now, she said, “We’ve got all these regulators suddenly vying for control.”

After the SEC alleged in an insider-trading case in July that at least seven cryptocurrencies listed on Coinbase should have been registered as securities, Republican CFTC Commissioner

Caroline Pham

accused the SEC of “regulation by enforcement.”

“The SEC is not working together with the CFTC,” Ms. Pham said in an interview. “They go out unilaterally to try to establish precedent that’s going to dramatically reshape the landscape as to what’s a security and what’s a commodity.”

Ms. Pham has posted photos to her

Twitter

account of herself posing alongside crypto lobbyists and executives including

Sam Bankman-Fried,

the billionaire founder of trading platform FTX.

Ms. Pham said that crypto is one of the areas she is focused on, and, “I take pictures with everybody. Like, literally, everybody.”

At the heart of the turf war are questions about how cryptocurrencies fit into the definition of a security, the legal classification that includes stocks and bonds.

Coinbase and other firms have lobbied Congress to create a new category for digital commodities and empower the CFTC to regulate it.



Photo:

Shannon Stapleton/REUTERS

A 1946 Supreme Court case created a test that focuses on whether investors buy an asset in hopes of profiting from the efforts of other people. If so, the issuer is required to register with the SEC and publicly disclose any information that may be material to the security’s price.

Even though investors in bitcoin and ether rely on a network of users and programmers to validate transactions and perform software updates, cryptocurrency enthusiasts insist those groups are too decentralized for the assets to be regulated like securities. Instead, they argue, the assets should be considered commodities, which have a broader definition and no full-time regulator.

Firms such as Coinbase, FTX and Ripple have spent millions of dollars over the past year lobbying Congress to create a new category for digital commodities and empower the CFTC to regulate it. The agency has roughly one-sixth the head count of the SEC, and its rules are seen by the industry as easier to comply with than securities laws.

“When you ask the people that are in the industry…almost all feel like the regulator should be primarily the CFTC,” Mr. Boozman said. “The fact that they’re fairly united on that makes it easier on members.”

Crypto skeptics worry that creating a new legal concept for cryptocurrencies could create an alternative to securities registration for a wider variety of assets.

“People who are taking action that could undermine our securities law are playing with fire,” said Dennis Kelleher, president of investor-advocacy group Better Markets. “You may love or hate the SEC, but transparent disclosure, clear rules…and enforcement is what builds trust and confidence in our markets.”

The legislation being unveiled Wednesday would seek to exclude securities from the definition of digital commodities, making it narrower in scope than that of other crypto-related bills floated in recent months, such as the Lummis-Gillibrand proposal.

Ms. Stabenow said she expects the Agriculture Committee to hold a hearing on the bill as early as September.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

How should the two largest cryptocurrencies, bitcoin and ether, be regulated? Join the conversation below.

The bill would require any entity acting as a digital commodity platform—including crypto exchanges such as Coinbase and FTX—to register with the CFTC as trading facilities, dealers or brokers. The exchanges would have to monitor trading, protect investors from abuse and only offer assets that are resistant to market manipulation, among other requirements.

Platforms also would be obliged to disclose some information about the assets they list, such as operating structure and conflicts of interest. Such information would likely fall short of the extensive disclosures required by the SEC for securities.

The derivatives markets the CFTC currently oversees are dominated by professional investors, such as banks and hedge funds. Crypto markets, by contrast, draw legions of small investors who are more vulnerable to scams.

If the agency wins jurisdiction over bitcoin and ether, the CFTC would have to write rules from scratch to protect such investors.

“How robust would they be and how long would that take?” asked Tyler Gellasch, executive director of the Healthy Markets Association, an investor trade group.

Write to Paul Kiernan at paul.kiernan@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Madcap Markets Push Goldman Sachs To Higher Trading Revenue, but Profit Falls

Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

GS 2.51%

said Monday that second-quarter earnings fell 47%, capping an earnings season where weak and volatile markets crimped investment banking revenue across the industry but boosted trading.

But what was bad for investment bankers was good for traders. Widespread volatility meant investors placed more trades across a variety of asset classes, and banks took advantage. At Goldman, second-quarter trading revenue rose 32% to $6.5 billion. The other banks also reported big increases in trading revenue.

However, all the major U.S. banks reported double-digit declines in profit, and most of them missed analysts’ expectations. Year-ago results were juiced by reserve releases across the industry, when the banks let go of some of the money they had socked away for pandemic losses.

This year so far has marked a comedown from what had been near-perfect conditions for Wall Street at the height of the pandemic. The stimulus from governments and central bankers in response to Covid led to a swift recovery from a recession and ebullient capital markets. The effects of the pandemic also led to changes in how customers and businesses operate, which sent corporate chieftains on a deal making spree.

The current environment is far less friendly. The highest inflation in decades, sharply higher interest rates, and significant geopolitical concerns have sent markets for a loop, with the S&P 500 recently finishing its worst first half in more than 50 years. That uncertainty has given corporate executives pause about taking their companies public or selling additional stock.

Likewise, the U.S. economy has been flashing disparate signals about its health. The finances of U.S. consumers and businesses remain relatively strong. Executives at Bank of America, which also reported second-quarter results on Monday, said their customers were spending and borrowing at a strong clip.

But higher costs for groceries, gas and rent are hurting many consumers, and U.S. households have started spending some of the savings they accumulated during the pandemic. Bank executives across the industry are concerned about a possible recession, although they haven’t seen clear evidence of one just yet.

Goldman CEO David Solomon noted conflicting signals on the inflation outlook.



Photo:

patrick t. fallon/Agence France-Presse/Getty Images

Goldman CEO

David Solomon

pointed to conflicting signals on the inflation outlook Monday. He said the bank’s corporate clients continue to experience persistent inflation in their own supply chains, but added that the firm’s economists expect inflation to slow in the rest of the year.

Goldman’s second-quarter profit fell to $2.9 billion from $5.5 billion a year ago. Revenue fell 23% to $11.9 billion, though both beat the expectations of analysts polled by FactSet.

Bank of America’s profit fell 32% to $6.2 billion and revenue rose 6% to $22.7 billion.

Goldman shares rose 2.5%. Bank of America shares were roughly flat.

Within the investment banks, stock-selling businesses were hit especially hard. In 2021, companies raced to go public via initial public offerings and blank-check companies known as SPACs. That activity has ground to a halt so far this year.

Goldman is planning to slow its hiring pace in the second half of the year, after staffing up for the pandemic deal making boom. The bank had 47,000 employees at the end of June, up from about 41,000 a year ago. Finance chief

Denis Coleman

also said the bank would bring back annual performance reviews for its workers, a practice Goldman had mostly suspended during the pandemic.

Bank Earnings Center

More coverage and analysis on the latest financial results from Wall Street

Citigroup executives said last week they expected the slowdown to be temporary and wouldn’t change their pace of hiring more investment bankers. “You’re going to see us take a strategic look at this and a long-term look rather than just a shooting from the hip on the expenses side, because we’re building the firm for the long term here,” CEO

Jane Fraser

said.

At Bank of America, where total investment banking revenue fell 46%, Chief Financial Officer

Alastair Borthwick

said investment banking would “rise back to more normal levels in the next few quarters when economic uncertainty becomes more muted.”

Total trading revenue grew 25% at Citigroup, 21% at Morgan Stanley, 15% at JPMorgan and 11% at Bank of America. Goldman’s 32% jump was powered by a big rise in fixed income, currencies and commodities.

JPMorgan generated more trading revenue than any second quarter except during the middle of the pandemic and notched its best-ever second quarter for equities trading.

“Trading markets whipsawed with each release of economic data during the quarter,”

Daniel Pinto,

JPMorgan’s president and the head of the corporate and investment bank, told staff in a memo last week.

Write to Charley Grant at charles.grant@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here