Tag Archives: Wondering

Helldivers 2 Operation Swift Disassembly was a success, leaving players wondering what’s next – Eurogamer.net

  1. Helldivers 2 Operation Swift Disassembly was a success, leaving players wondering what’s next Eurogamer.net
  2. Some Helldivers 2 Players Are Threatening to Teamkill Anyone Who Wears the New Malevelon Creek Cape — but the Community Is Fighting Back IGN
  3. Helldivers 2 grunts have dismantled the Automatons and are squishing Terminids at pace, but can’t help but fear Game Master Joel plans something horrid Gamesradar
  4. Helldivers 2 players just wiped out an entire enemy faction, so what on Super Earth happens now? PC Gamer
  5. ‘Helldivers 2’ Players Just Killed Every Automaton In The Game, Now What Happens? Forbes

Read original article here

Blake Lively reacts perfectly to Ryan Reynolds’ joke wondering where she was during Super Bowl 2024 – New York Post

  1. Blake Lively reacts perfectly to Ryan Reynolds’ joke wondering where she was during Super Bowl 2024 New York Post
  2. Blake Lively Had the Cutest Response to Husband Ryan Reynolds’s Super Bowl Joke Yahoo Life
  3. Blake Lively Responds to Husband Ryan Reynolds’ Super Bowl Joke with ‘Honey, I’m Home’ Photo PEOPLE
  4. ‘Honey, I’m home!’ – Wrexham co-owner Ryan Reynolds ‘finds’ wife Blake Lively after Super Bowl party in Las Vegas alongside Taylor Swift & victorious Kansas City Chiefs Goal.com
  5. Blake Lively Responds to Ryan Reynolds Trolling Her About Super Bowl 2024 BFF Outing – E! Online E! NEWS

Read original article here

Is Bold & Beautiful’s R.J. Forrester Gay? Here’s Why We’re Wondering… – Soaps.com

  1. Is Bold & Beautiful’s R.J. Forrester Gay? Here’s Why We’re Wondering… Soaps.com
  2. B&B’s Annika Noelle on the Aftermath of Hope Kissing Thomas: “There Will Be a Fallout That Will Impact the Entire Canvas” Michael Fairman TV
  3. The Bold and the Beautiful Recaps: Exotic Locals, Passion & Disappointment Soap Hub
  4. The Bold and the Beautiful Recap: Ridge Asks Brooke to be His Forever Logan Daytime Confidential
  5. The Bold and the Beautiful Spoilers: Hope & Thomas’ Bedroom Fireworks – No Holding Back After Offi… Celebrity Dirty Laundry
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Early Updated COVID-19 Vaccine Recipients Left Wondering: When’s the Next Booster Shot? | The Report | U.S. News – U.S. News & World Report

  1. Early Updated COVID-19 Vaccine Recipients Left Wondering: When’s the Next Booster Shot? | The Report | U.S. News U.S. News & World Report
  2. Chicago Department of Public Health revising at-home COVID 19 vaccine schedule; flu shot also offered WLS-TV
  3. Preliminary Estimates of Effectiveness of Monovalent mRNA Vaccines in Preventing Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Children Aged 3–5 Years — Increasing Community Access to Testing Program, United States, July 2022–February 2023 | MMWR CDC
  4. Evaluation of BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine in Children Younger than 5 Years of Age | NEJM nejm.org
  5. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

How do you lose a radioactive capsule? Australian investigators are wondering too


Brisbane, Australia
CNN
 — 

The discovery of a tiny lost radioactive capsule beside a remote highway in Western Australia raises many questions – not least how it escaped layers of radiation-proof packaging loaded onto a moving truck.

It’s one of the many puzzling aspects of a case investigators will examine in the coming weeks as they try to piece together the timeline of the capsule’s movements from January 12, when it was packaged for transport, to February 1, when a recovery team found it by the side of the road.

The capsule – just 8 millimeters by 6 millimeters – was used in a density gauge fitted to a pipe at Rio Tinto’s Gudai-Darri iron ore mine to measure the flow of material through the feeder.

Rio Tinto said in a statement Monday the capsule was packaged for transit to Perth, 1,400 kilometers (870 miles away), with its presence inside the package confirmed by a Geiger counter before it was transported by a third-party contractor.

Normally, the trip would take more than 12 hours by road, but roughly two hours in, the capsule exited the vehicle as it traveled south, and somehow crossed one lane of traffic, to end up two meters (6.5 feet) from the northbound side of the two-lane highway.

Lauren Steen, general manager of Radiation Services WA, a consultancy that writes radiation management plans, said industry insiders were just as baffled as the public when they heard the capsule was missing.

“The whole team were scratching our head. We couldn’t figure out what had happened,” said Steen, whose company was not involved in its disappearance.

“If the source had been placed in a certified package and transported under all of the requirements of the code of practice, then it’s an extremely unlikely event – one-in-a-million,” she said.

The truck thought to be carrying the capsule arrived in Perth on January 16, four days after its departure from the Gudai-Darri iron ore mine. But it wasn’t until January 25, when workers from SGS Australia went to unpack the gauge for inspection, that it was discovered missing.

In a statement, SGS Australia said it had been hired by Rio Tinto to package the capsule but it had nothing to do with its transportation, which was carried out by a “specialist transporter.”

“We performed the contracted service to package the equipment at the mine site and unpackage it following transportation using qualified personnel for our customer in accordance with all standards and regulations,” it said.

“The transportation of the package, organized by our client and delegated to a specialist transporter, was not within the scope of SGS services. Our personnel noticed the loss of the source at our Perth laboratory when opening the package and reported this incident immediately.”

The name of the company contracted to transport the package has not been released.

The missing capsule triggered a six-day search along a stretch of the Great Northern Highway. Then on Wednesday morning, a car fitted with special equipment traveling south of the small town of Newman detected a higher radiation reading. Handheld devices were then used to hone in on the capsule nestled in the dirt.

In Australia, each state has its own laws regarding the handling of radioactive substances and codes of practice that comply with guidelines set by the Australian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA), a government body that works closely with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and World Health Organization (WHO).

In Western Australia, the rules are governed by the Radiation Safety Act 1975, which Steen says is well overdue for review. “It hasn’t been rewritten since the 70s, so I think that kind of speaks for itself,” she said.

Steen said over the decades technological advancements had made the use of radiation sources within mining equipment much safer – and because it was safer, devices were being used more frequently. As of 2021, over 150 projects were operating in Western Australia, the hub of the country’s mining exports, according to the state’s Chamber of Minerals and Energy.

Under the Radiation Safety Act 1975, only specially trained and licensed operators can package radioactive substances, but different rules apply to contractors hired to transport it, Steen said.

“Any transport company can transport radioactive material provided they have got the license to do so,” she said.

Under the act that license can be obtained by attending a one-day course and passing a test certified and approved by the regulator.

The licensee must have oversight of a transportation plan submitted to the regulator but does not have to supervise the journey in person. There are no rules about the type of vehicles used for transport.

Steen says clearly something went wrong – and she hopes the results of the investigation will be shared with the radiation community so they can avoid such issues in future.

Discussion has already started about the need for tougher penalties – in WA, mishandling radioactive substances carries a fine of just 1,000 Australian dollars ($714) – a figure described as “ridiculously low” by Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to reporters on Wednesday.

The rules around packaging radiation sources depend on how much radiation they emit. In some cases, the device could be encased in three layers. In the case of the capsule, the gauge could be considered one layer of protection before it was placed into an “overpack,” a container that was likely bolted shut.

In a statement, DFES said when the package was opened the gauge was found to be broken, with one of the four mounting bolts missing. Referring to the capsule, the statement added, “the source itself and all screws on the gauge were also missing.”

One theory investigators may examine is if the gauge broke and the capsule fell out of the overpack through a hole used to secure the lid.

It’s expected to be several weeks before the Radiological Council submits its report to the WA health minister. Meanwhile, Rio Tinto is carrying out its own investigation.

CEO Simon Trott said the company would be willing to reimburse the government for costs associated with the search – if requested.

WA Emergency Services Minister Stephen Dawson said the offer was appreciated but the government would wait for the outcome of the investigation to apportion blame.

He said he didn’t know how much the search had cost but at least 100 people were involved including police, firefighters, health department and defence force personnel.

Staff from the National Emergency Management Agency, the Australian Nuclear and Science Technology Organization and the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency also took part.

On Thursday, relieved DFES officials released new images of the capsule being taken to Perth where it will be safely held in a facility.

This time, it traveled in a convoy of enclosed white vehicles – with big stickers warning of the presence of a radioactive substance.

Read original article here

When My Father Died, I Felt Relieved. But An Unearthed Childhood Photo Has Me Wondering More.

“1975 was not the greatest year for children’s fashions but I was trying my best to be a stylin’ baby butch.”  (Photo: Photo Courtesy Of Kelli Dunham)

I am the fifth and final child born into a struggling rural Midwestern family. My mom reports that I was so active in utero that she knew she was having “a boy or a heaven-help-us girl.” I identify as nonbinary now, but “heaven-help-us girl” is probably a more accurate description of my gender. 

Like a sitcom character sent from central casting to portray The Kid Who Would Wreak Havoc, I emerged as a fully formed, sensitive, opinionated coastal genderqueer.

Starting at age 7, I asked to be a vegetarian (in ’70s farmland Wisconsin), to which my mother replied, “What on earth would you eat?” One Sunday afternoon, I spent three hours following my mom around from room to room, pestering her about what we could do to keep harp seals from being clubbed. She just wanted to clean her house. 

When it rained, I regularly missed the school bus. I would be delayed by my quest to prevent worms from getting run over by returning each of them from the pavement onto the grass.

My third-grade teacher gave us an art project that undid me completely. She put her 45 record of Gordon Lightfoot’s “The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald” on repeat and told us to draw the story. As I attempted to crayon the capsized boat with the sailors spilling into the water, the lyrics caused me to break into protracted sobs so intense that the teacher frantically scheduled a conference with my mom. 

While my mom was summoned for these (and many other) crying-related emergencies, my dad unraveled in frustration in response to my inexplicable, insistent and highly inconvenient tenderhearted antics. 

If Archie Bunker, the Great Santini and Matt Foley, motivational speaker, somehow overcame biology and their status as fictional characters to produce a child, that offspring would be my father. 

He was an almost ludicrously stoic man who was raised on a struggling farm near the struggling town of Caro, Michigan, by an even more stoic and also struggling father. He often bragged that he hadn’t ever seen his father smile.

The ’70s self-help classics like ”How to Win Friends and Influence People” and ”Winning Through Intimidation” enthralled him. He would signal the beginning of breakfast (always at 6 a.m.) by slamming his fist on the table and announcing, “Act enthusiastic, and you’ll be enthusiastic!”

He would then add, “Most people are just about as happy as they make up their mind they’re going to be,” a quote he alternately attributed to Dale Carnegie and Winston Churchill, which seemed aimed directly at me.

But I wasn’t unhappy, 

I was just worried about the worms.

And the harp seals.

And the whales.

And the widows of the Edmund Fitzgerald crew.

I also really, really, really really didn’t want to wear a dress to school, even on picture day. 

Concerned about — and inevitably annoyed by — behavior he found inexplicable, my dad would attempt to head off a sob attack by asking, “Oh, are you gonna cry now?”

Since the answer to that question was nearly always yes, it’s curious that he never reconsidered the effectiveness of his behavior modification technique. 

My mom always informed us, “Your father never struck you in anger,” and although that particular narrative doesn’t match my historical recollection, I prefer my version. If you’re going to get hit, “I’m mad” seems like a better reason than, for example, “It’s Tuesday.”

My father was a lifelong smoker. When I was 12, he developed lung cancer. I knew I was supposed to be worried ― and I felt sad to watch him suffer so much from ultimately futile treatments — but the weaker he got, the less afraid I felt. 

When he was sick, I felt ambivalent. I was heartbroken for his physical anguish. But each chemo treatment he underwent made it less likely he’d explode across the dinner table for an offense only he understood — drinking in between bites of food was an inexplicable and random pet peeve ― eventually leaving me with a bloody nose or much much worse. 

When he died, the ambivalence was replaced with relief. There was relief for him, that he was no longer suffering. But there was also ease in simply feeling safer. The man who had once beaten our 125-pound Newfoundland dog with a two-by-four didn’t live in our house any more. The constant creeping fear of “Could I be next?” was gone. 

And then I felt guilt for feeling relief. 

I wouldn’t say the Germanic culture of rural Wisconsin during the ‘70s particularly helped me develop the ability to read other folks’ emotional cues. Still, as near as I could figure, it seemed my cisgender, less emotionally soggy siblings who were much less likely to become a focus of my dad’s anger and my mom all missed him. Maybe even a lot. 

I pretended to be mildly sad; it seemed impolite to be less concerned about the death of my flesh and blood than a harp seal I had never met. 

“You’re very brave,” said my seventh grade physical education teacher when I returned to school and didn’t mention my dad’s death, even to my friends. 

“Sure,” I thought, “let’s call this brave.” 

I guarded my grief secret closely until I was in my early 40s. A new friend heard me reference one of my more unsavory memories of my father, and she brightened up.

“Oh, you’re part of the Glad Dead Dad club too?” Being asked that question loosened decades of guilt that had been tight like a band around my chest. The Glad Dead Dad’s Club is not a large club, perhaps, but I was extremely relieved to discover I was not the only member.

I took to social media the following Father’s Day and shared, “had a great day courtesy of my dad’s death from lung cancer when I was 12. I should write Philip Morris a letter. I bet Big Tobacco doesn’t get a lot of thank you notes.”

It wasn’t the world’s most nuanced post (and frankly not the most well-received), but it was a relief to be open after spending years feeling like I was a villain in a Disney animated movie. We didn’t have a simple relationship. Why would I expect my feelings in response to his death to be uncomplicated? 

Then last year, my older sister patiently scanned 2,000-plus pictures my dad had taken during the last 30 years of his life. She emailed me a link to the massive online photo album site with a note, “I think I found the cover image for your next comedy album.”

I clicked through the site. There were countless images of trees damaged by ice storms, our Ford LTD station wagon looking small next to giant snowdrifts, children looking small next to giant vegetables, and a large slobbering outdoor dog we should have taken much better care of. When pictures captured groups of adults, each person would have a cigarette in one hand and a drink in the other.

Then I found the photo she was referencing. 

Although I was wearing my brother’s hand-me-down baseball cap and carrying a bat, I was not playing baseball. I was hanging out in the woods, building a fort, and living my best life.

(Photo: Photo Courtesy Of Kelli Dunham)

(Photo: Photo Courtesy Of Kelli Dunham)

I don’t have a specific memory of my dad taking this photo, but he didn’t habitually carry his camera, so he would have had to stop whatever chore he was doing and get his camera, film, and flashbulbs from the house to capture this moment. It doesn’t seem like a behavior sequence motivated by annoyance. It felt like a picture taken by someone who really saw this kid.

Whenever I refer to my parents as the cliche “doing their best,” my Slightly Sarcastic New York Therapist will say in her Slightly Sarcastic New York Way, “Hmmm. Really. So that was their best.”

They would perhaps not be shortlisted as candidates for parents of the year now (or in the ’70s), but within their context, given their skills and resources, they certainly could have done much worse. 

This photo made me wonder how much more of me my dad indeed saw but didn’t have the emotional language or experience to communicate. What could have happened between my father and me if he had lived and been given access to any tool to improve his relationships: therapy, the 12 steps or, in a pinch, even AITA on Reddit

Not that my dad would have become the kind of parent who has an ironic handlebar mustache, brews his own kombucha and gives his children multiple choices about what brand of organic yogurt they’d prefer. But in a world where my dentist asks about my pronouns and Target carries transmasculine packing underwear, perhaps he could have at least been proud of the sensitive, not-a-man, not-a-woman that I’ve become.

My grief for my dad is still complicated. Because I’m so grateful for the years of safety his death provided for me, it would be disingenuous to turn in my membership card for the Glad Dead Dad’s Club. My tears — which, of course, would make him bananas ― reflect my sadness for both of us, and our collective missed potential opportunity to know and be known. 

Do you have a compelling personal story you’d like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we’re looking for here and send us a pitch.

This article originally appeared on HuffPost and has been updated.

Read original article here

Wondering About the 6 Rays Coming out of JWST’s Test Image? Here’s why They Happen

At the Space Telescope Science Institute (STSI) in Baltimore, Maryland, NASA engineers are busy aligning the mirrors and instruments on the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). In the meantime, the mission team has provided us with another glimpse of what this observatory – a successor to the venerable Hubble Space Telescope – will see once it is fully operational. The latest teaser is a “telescope alignment evaluation image” of a distant star that looks red and spiked!

This milestone represents the completion of the fifth phase of preparation, known as “fine phasing,” where the mission controllers adjusted each of Webb’s primary mirror segments to produce a unified image using only the Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam). This image was focused on a bright star at the center of JWST’s alignment. This star is known as 2MASS J17554042+6551277 and is located about 2,000 light-years from Earth.

The sensitivity of Webb’s optics and NIRCam (and a red filter that optimized the visual contrasts) meant that the galaxies and stars in the background were also visible. But whereas the background stars and galaxies are billions of years away (and a bit distorted), the foreground star is spiked in appearance. These are known as diffraction spikes (or a “spider”), which refer to artifacts created by a telescope’s secondary mirror or aperture.

Image of the alignment evaluation star, called 2MASS J17554042+6551277. Credit: NASA/STScI

According to Dr. Christopher S. Baird, an Assistant Professor of Physics at West Texas A&M University:

“Certain telescopes have a large primary mirror that focuses the incoming beam of light onto a secondary mirror or a sensor that is held over the primary mirror. The secondary mirror diverts the light out of the telescope so it can be seen or further processed. Or, alternately, a sensor held above the primary mirror converts the image to an electrical signal that is delivered to a computer.”

The key to diffraction spikes, writes Baird, is that the secondary mirror (or sensor) is held in place over the primary mirror by support rods (aka. struts or vanes), which obstruct the incoming light. As starlight enters the telescope and heads towards the primary mirror, some of it skims past the support rods and is slightly deflected. This diffraction ultimately shifts light in the final image, forming a “spider” that conforms to the position of the support rods (not the original image).

“For stars and other bright point sources of light, this shifted light pattern takes the form of radial spikes,” adds Baird. “When the support rods of a telescope’s secondary mirror are built in a nice, symmetrical cross pattern, the diffraction spikes in the image of the star takes on the same cross pattern.”

One look at JWST’s secondary mirror shows that it does not conform to a crossed or six-sided “spider” diffraction. However, diffraction can also be caused by the edge of a telescope’s aperture, which incoming light must also pass through. Since the apertures of most telescopes and cameras are circular, they typically create diffraction rings rather than spikes that are generally very faint – and known as an “Airy pattern.”

Webb’s primary mirror intercepts red and infrared light traveling through space and reflects it onto a smaller secondary mirror. Credits: IMAGE: STScI, Andi James (STScI)

As Baird explained, diffraction spikes can also be caused by hexagonal-shaped apertures, which is consistent with James Webb’s mirror segments:

“If the aperture is not circular but has some other shape, then both rings and spikes can result from just the aperture. Such polygonal apertures also cause diffraction spikes. Diffraction spikes seen in images taken by lens-based cameras are therefore not caused by support rods but by the non-circular aperture. In contrast, telescopes usually have circular apertures and therefore create images with diffraction spikes caused by the support rods.”

This is common with segmented primary mirrors, which are common for ground-based observatories. Examples include the Keck Telescopes, the Gran Telescopio Canarias (GTC), the Hobby-Eberly Telescope (HET), the Southern African Large Telescope (SALT), and the Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope (LAMOST) in China. With its 6.5-meter (21-foot 4-inch) primary mirror (made up of 18 hexagonal beryllium mirror segments), Webb is the first space telescope to utilize such a design.

Although there are months to go before Webb commences science operations and delivers new views of the cosmos, this image represents a major milestone. It signals the completion of Phase 5 and that Webb’s primary imager and its optical system are functioning as well as can be expected. As Webb’s deputy optical telescope element manager, Ritva Keski-Kuha, indicated in a recent NASA press release, it has bolstered the mission team’s confidence in the telescope.

“We have fully aligned and focused the telescope on a star, and the performance is beating specifications,” she said. “We are excited about what this means for science. We now know we have built the right telescope.” Over the next six weeks, the team will proceed through the remaining alignment steps before conducting the final science instrument preparations.

The team is currently in the sixth phase of preparation, where they will conduct measurements at multiple field points and extend the alignment to the rest of the instruments – the Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec), Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI), and Near InfraRed Imager and Slitless Spectrograph (NIRISS). For this phase, an algorithm will evaluate the performance of each instrument and then calculate the final corrections needed to achieve a well-aligned telescope across all science instruments.

Following this, Webb’s final alignment step will begin, and the team will adjust any small, residual positioning errors in the mirror segments. Said Thomas Zurbuchen, associate administrator for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate (SMD) in Washington D.C.:

“More than 20 years ago, the Webb team set out to build the most powerful telescope that anyone has ever put in space and came up with an audacious optical design to meet demanding science goals. Today we can say that design is going to deliver.”

The team is on track to conclude all aspects of the Optical Telescope Element (OTE) alignment by early May before moving on to the final two months of science instrument preparations (Phase 7). Preparations are expected to wrap up by this summer, at which point Webb’s first full-resolution imagery and science data will be released. So get ready for more breathtaking images like this one!

Speaking of images, check out the #JWSTArt Submissions Slideshow, which features art inspired by the JWST.

Further Reading: NASA, West Texas A&M University

Read original article here