Tag Archives: Wasnt

The withdrawal that wasn’t – POLITICO

Welcome to the second week of National Security Daily, POLITICO’s newsletter on the global events roiling Washington and keeping the administration up at night. I’m Nahal Toosi, POLITICO’s foreign affairs correspondent. Your regular host, Alex Ward, has gone undercover on a previously planned mission to visit his in-laws and will be back next Monday. Until then, Quint and I will be your guides to who’s up, who’s down and what’s happening inside the Pentagon, the NSC and D.C.’s foreign policy machine. As with Pentagon reporter Lara Seligman today, we may have some special guests along the way. National Security Daily will arrive in your inbox Monday through Friday by 4 p.m.; please subscribe here.

Still aim your tips, comments and hate mail at [email protected] and @alexbward on Twitter. Make sure to follow @nahaltoosi and @QuintForgey, too!

No, President JOE BIDEN is not withdrawing all U.S. troops from Iraq.

The commander in chief and Iraqi Prime Minister MUSTAFA AL-KADHIMI touted an agreement to end the U.S. combat mission there by the end of the year during a much-anticipated Oval Office meeting this afternoon. But don’t expect the vast majority of American forces in the country to return home anytime soon.

Biden and al-Kadhimi’s agreement formally establishes an end date for the U.S. combat role in Iraq — but only on paper. In reality, no American troops have fought in combat in Iraq for more than a year, defense officials said. Instead, the 2,500 troops on the ground, including special forces, are focused on training and supporting the Iraqis actively battling the Islamic State with airstrikes, logistics and intelligence. That mission will continue, officials said.

Experts and former military officials say the announcement today was more of a symbolic gesture than a concrete shift, designed to boost al-Kadhimi ahead of parliamentary elections this fall. “It looks more like a rebranding exercise designed to help [al-Kadhimi] politically and throw a bone to those Iraqi groups that have joined the push for a troop withdrawal,” said ARON LUND, a fellow at The Century Foundation. “I think everyone realizes there’s a bit of theater involved here.”

“It is a game of appearances more than substance,” added RYAN CROCKER, a former U.S. ambassador to Iraq.

Meanwhile, former Brig. Gen. MARK KIMMITT — a former top Pentagon official in the Bush administration and director of operations and chief military spokesperson in Iraq — said the situation on the ground will not change. “If the non-combat intelligence, advisory and logistic missions continue with the same troop levels, it is unlikely this decision will have a significant operational impact,” Kimmitt said.

The new agreement isn’t even really new. In fact, U.S. and Iraqi officials agreed last spring that the time had come for Iraqi forces to conduct independent operations and for American forces to focus more heavily on an advisory role. That shift was made official in an April joint statement, although a timetable was not specified for the transition.

Biden aides dispute the notion that the announcement is purely symbolic. A senior administration official, speaking Friday on condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive topic, said to expect “adjustments” between now and the end of the year as American forces in Iraq complete the shift — meaning that some special forces could leave or be reassigned.

On Monday, alongside the Iraqi leader, Biden laid out his vision for the change: “Our role in Iraq will be as a — dealing with not — it’s just to be available. To continue to train, to assist, to help and to deal with ISIS as it arrives,” he said. “But we’re not going to be, by the end of the year, in a combat mission.”

FIRST IN NATSEC DAILY — VP SET FOR SOUTHEAST ASIA TREK: Vice President KAMALA HARRIS is planning to visit Vietnam and Singapore later this summer, a U.S. official familiar with the issue tells Nahal. The Asia swing — the details of which remain tentative and could change — will likely take place in August. The coronavirus pandemic is expected to be on Harris’ agenda. The vice president’s office would not comment.

UNITED, SORT OF, ON CUBA: The Biden administration is touting a new joint statement on Cuba that it issued along with 20 other countries. The statement says the nations “condemn the mass arrests and detentions of protestors in Cuba and call on the government to respect the universal rights and freedoms of the Cuban people, including the free flow of information to all Cubans.” But the group that issued the statement is missing some notable names. Where’s Britain? Canada? France? Germany? Asked if we were missing something, a State Department spokesperson said: “We refer you to those countries directly.”

THE OTHER ASIAN ALLY: Deputy Secretary of State WENDY SHERMAN — whose recent adventures you’ll read about further down — visited Mongolia over the weekend. Unlike India, Mongolia rarely makes headlines in the U.S. But as a democracy sandwiched between Russia and China, few countries have more to gain or lose from America’s geopolitical rivalries. In 2019, the U.S. and Mongolia upgraded their ties to a “strategic partnership.” While the State Department’s readout of Sherman’s visit didn’t mention China or Russia, the two autocratic nations loomed between the lines. Sherman “discussed ways to strengthen Mongolia’s democratic institutions, enhance its sovereignty, and diversify its economy.”

WELCOME TO NATIONAL SECURITY DAILY. Thanks for tuning in to POLITICO’s newsletter on the national security politics roiling Washington. NatSec Daily is for the top U.S. and foreign officials, the lawmakers, the lobbyists, the experts and the people like you who care about how the natsec sausage is made. Please share this subscription link with a colleague or friend. Tips welcome anytime at [email protected], and follow me at @alexbward on Twitter.

IF YOU’RE MISSING MORNING DEFENSE, DON’T WORRY — WE’RE STILL HERE: Morning D is now turbo-charged and better than ever, coming at Pro subscribers bright and early every a.m. Get more intel and sign up here. With industry scoops, breaking Pentagon news, and new reporters covering acquisitions and influence, you can’t afford to miss it.

TUNISIA IN TURMOIL: Tunisia has been the sole democratic success story from the Arab Spring. Ten years later, its democracy appears in peril. Amid popular fury over the economy and the coronavirus pandemic, the country’s president on Sunday sacked the prime minister and suspended parliament. Leaders of Ennahda, the Islamist party that has the largest bloc in parliament, called it a coup. Supporters and critics of the moves clashed on the streets on Monday, while Al-Jazeera reported that Tunisian police stormed its office.

White House press secretary JEN PSAKI told reporters that the administration was “concerned about the developments” in the country. U.S. officials, she said, “are in touch at a senior level from both the White House and the State Department with Tunisian leaders to learn more about the situation, urge calm and support Tunisian efforts to move forward in line with democratic principles.”

Psaki added that branding the unrest in Tunisia as a coup “is a legal determination, and we would look to the State Department to conduct a legal analysis before making” that designation. “There hasn’t been a conclusion on that front,” she said.

THE AIR IN AFGHANISTAN: Gen. KENNETH MCKENZIE, the head of U.S. Central Command, said over the weekend that the Pentagon will continue conducting airstrikes against advancing Taliban militants in support of the Afghan security forces at least until the American withdrawal is complete by the end of August — but he wouldn’t say whether that support would continue past the Aug. 31 pullout deadline.

Airstrikes are the last remaining leverage the U.S. military has over the Taliban, which has captured more than half of Afghanistan’s districts across the country. Despite the Taliban’s gains, officials have previously insisted that U.S. air support will end after American troops leave the country. But McKenzie’s refusal to commit to ending the airstrikes raises the question of whether there is room for Biden to authorize continued airstrikes after the official drawdown.

CHINA CONSTRUCTING MASSIVE CYBER CENTER: Since 2017, China has been building a 15-square-mile National Cybersecurity Center campus in Wuhan to help facilitate its ambitions of becoming a “cyber powerhouse,” DAKOTA CARY writes for Defense One.

A new report by Georgetown University’s Center for Security and Emerging Technology, together with an interactive map of satellite photos, shows that the NCC site includes seven centers for research, talent cultivation and entrepreneurship; two government-focused laboratories; and a National Cybersecurity School. Still, Beijing’s road to cyber dominance remains far from free of obstacles.

INDIANS IN SYNC WITH AMERICANS ON AI: Another recent study from the Center for Security and Emerging Technology concluded that India has become an important strategic partner to the U.S. in the field of artificial intelligence, reports National Defense Magazine’s MANDY MAYFIELD.

The center’s researchers — who examined India’s potential for AI development across a number of indicators including talent, research, patents, cloud computing, and companies and investment — “saw that there are strong arguments in favor of an India-USA partnership,” said HUSANJOT CHAHAL, a co-author of the report.

The U.S. is currently partnering with India on emerging technologies, and the U.S. National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence has also proposed creating a U.S.-India strategic technology alliance.

LOCKHEED MARTIN MISSES ITS MARK: Although Lockheed Martin’s space business boosted revenues in the year’s second quarter, a classified aeronautics development program caused the world’s largest defense contractor to miss analysts’ profit estimate, per MIKE STONE of Reuters.

Quarterly sales at Lockheed’s largest unit, aeronautics — which makes the F-35 fighter jet — rose 2.5 percent to $6.6 billion. But “performance issues” at aeronautics in the quarter led to a loss of $225 million on “a highly classified program that Lockheed Martin has been working on for a couple of years,” said KEN POSSENRIEDE, Lockheed’s chief financial officer.

Although Lockheed wouldn’t say which program caused the loss, our own LEE HUDSON reports that it’s likely either the AGM-183 Air-Launched Rapid Response Weapon or the Hypersonic Air-breathing Weapon Concept. Those two hypersonic weapon programs are not classified, but certain aspects are, such as where the glide vehicles and boosters are being built.

PROPS FROM THE PENTAGON CHIEF: Defense Secretary LLOYD AUSTIN gave a shout-out to 1st Lt. AMBER ENGLISH, a logistics officer in the Army Reserve, for notching a record-setting 56 hits and scoring a gold medal in women’s skeet at the Olympic Games in Tokyo. “Your country is extremely proud of you today, and I’m so glad you’re representing us,” Austin tweeted.

SENATORS SWELL BIDEN’S NAVY BUDGET: The Senate Armed Services Committee, deeply unhappy with the Biden administration’s Navy blueprint, tacked an extra $2 billion onto the service’s acquisition budget in last week’s National Defense Authorization Act markup, our own PAUL MCLEARY reports.

The proposed funding boost for the Navy — which comes as part of the $25 billion senators added to the White House’s defense budget request last Thursday — paves the way for the service to purchase a second destroyer, transport vessel and more F-35C fighter jets.

AREA LAWMAKER WANTS TO TALK: We are reliably informed that Sen. CHRIS MURPHY (D-Conn.) has something he’d like to say about America’s military aid to a certain dictator-run country. “Congress needs to have a serious talk about Egypt,” Murphy tweeted Sunday, along with a Foreign Policy column by CHARLES DUNNE. Give us a call, senator. We’re listening.

TALKS GET TENSE IN TIANJIN: The U.S.-China relationship is “in a stalemate and faces serious difficulties,” Vice Foreign Minister XIE FENG told Deputy Secretary of State WENDY SHERMAN today when the senior American diplomat visited the Chinese city of Tianjin — the two countries’ first high-level engagement in months — per a recap of the session by Bloomberg News.

For her part, Sherman conveyed the administration’s “concerns about human rights, including Beijing’s anti-democratic crackdown in Hong Kong; the ongoing genocide and crimes against humanity in Xinjiang; abuses in Tibet; and the curtailing of media access and freedom of the press,” among several other hot-button issues, according to a State Department readout.

Sherman, who also met with Foreign Minister WANG YI on her two-day China trip, reflected on the contentious round of talks in an interview with KEN MORITSUGU of the Associated Press: “We will see whether, in fact, there’s follow up and we are able to move another step. There’s no way to know in the early stages of building this relationship whether we will get to all the places that we hoped for.”

MIDAIR SWEARING-IN: Defense Secretary LLOYD AUSTIN swore in ELY RATNER as the assistant secretary of defense for Indo-Pacific security affairs on Sunday, aboard Austin’s E4-B “Doomsday Plane” over the Pacific en route to Singapore. Austin tweeted a picture of himself administering the oath.

Foreign Affairs: “How Biden Can Bolster India’s Democracy”

The Intercept: “Colombian Mercenaries and the Assassination of Haitian President Jovenel Moïse”

The Nation: “Like JFK, Biden Has Good Reason to Be Wary of the Military”

— President JOE BIDEN visits the Office of the Director of National Intelligence: He will address the intelligence community workforce and its leadership, per the White House.

— Deputy Secretary of State WENDY SHERMAN travels to Oman: She will meet with Deputy Foreign Minister Sheikh Khalifa Al Harthy to discuss advancing peace and security in the region, per the State Department.

— Defense Secretary LLOYD AUSTIN, in Singapore, addresses the International Institute for Strategic Studies, 6 a.m.: “The 40th IISS Fullerton Lecture: The imperative of partnership”

— The American Enterprise Institute, 8:30 a.m.: “Scoping the threat: Do African Salafi-jihadi groups threaten the West?”

— Chatham House, 9 a.m.: “Paper launch: Breaking the curse of corruption in Lebanon”

— Deputy Defense Secretary KATHLEEN HICKS delivers a keynote speech at the Pentagon, 9:30 a.m.: She will speak at the unveiling of the 2021 National POW/MIA Recognition Day poster.

— The Congressional-Executive Commission on China, 10 a.m.: “Corporate Sponsorship of the 2022 Beijing Olympics”

— House Foreign Affairs Committee, 10 a.m.: “Subcommittee on Asia, the Pacific, Central Asia, and Nonproliferation hearing: Scenarios in a Cross-Strait Conflict”

— Senate Foreign Relations Committee, 10 a.m.: “Nominations hearing for ISOBEL COLEMAN, RUFUS GIFFORD and LEE SATTERFIELD

— Chatham House, 11 a.m.: “How do we tackle ransomware?”

— The Institute of Strategic Studies Islamabad, 11 a.m.: “Book Launch: Pakistan’s Response Towards Terrorism – A Case Study of Musharraf Regime”

— KELLI SEYBOLT, deputy undersecretary of the Air Force for international affairs, addresses the Wilson Center, 11:30 a.m.: “Arctic Security Dialogues IV | Progress on the Department of the Air Force Arctic Strategy”

— Gen. JAMES DICKINSON, commander of the U.S. Space Command, addresses Auburn University’s McCrary Institute and The George Washington University’s Space Policy Institute, 11:45 a.m.: “Securing Space”

— The Heritage Foundation, 12 p.m.: “Scaling Up the U.S. Response to the Coup in Burma”

— The Hudson Institute, 12 p.m.: “IndoPac Strategy & Thailand with Michael George DeSombre”

— New America, 12 p.m.: “Trevor Aaronson, American ISIS”

— PATRICIA BARRON, deputy assistant secretary of Defense for military community and family policy, addresses the Center for Strategic and International Studies, 1 p.m.: “Food Security in the Military: What We Know and Why It Matters”

— The Progressive Policy Institute, 7 p.m.: “Global Tech, Global Democracy: How Tech Has Broken Down International Boundaries?”

Have a natsec-centric event coming up? Transitioning to a new defense-adjacent or foreign policy-focused gig? Shoot us an email at [email protected] or [email protected] to be featured in the next edition of the newsletter.



Read original article here

Curtis Sliwa, GOP candidate for NYC mayor, says he wasn’t invited to White House to discuss crime reduction

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate for mayor of New York City, questioned why he wasn’t invited Monday to meet with President Biden and several law enforcement leaders from across the nation to discuss strategies on how to reduce violent crime — while his Democratic opponent, Eric Adams, was. 

Sliwa said Adams, a former police officer and current Brooklyn borough president, has already been coronated as the mayor by the media. 

The founder of the Guardian Angels anti-crime group said he should have been invited to the White House roundtable given his vast experience with gun violence. 

Sliwa was kidnapped and shot five times in 1992 while trying to hail a taxi in what was thought to be a mafia hit. John Gotti Jr., son of John Gotti, the deceased former leader of the Gambino crime family, was tried multiple times for the shooting but never convicted. 

NYC MAYOR DE BLASIO MOCKED FOR TWEET ON ‘BRIGHT’ FUTURE AMID CITY’S CRIME WAVE

Curtis Sliwa founded the “Guardian Angels” in 1979.

Prosecutors alleged Gotti tried to have Sliwa killed because he criticized his father on his radio show. 

“Having been a victim of gun violence and having gone through the federal court system in handling that, in dealing with violence in the streets would have given a more pragmatic and more common sense solution to our problems,” Sliwa said during a news conference. “I’m hoping the process was not a political one because really this is a tremendous advantage for Eric Adams.”

“I think I should have had a place at the table,” he added. 

He also blasted Adams for purporting to be a law and order candidate despite taking positions to the contrary, for instance supporting making the city’s subway system free, which Sliwa said would entice offenders to take their crimes underground. 

“That’s not a law and order philosophy. I represent a law and order philosophy,” he said. “I guarantee you. It’s almost like we’re going to see round three of [Mayor] Bill de Blasio in office, except his name will be Eric Adams.”

Other leaders who attended the White House meeting included Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser and Chicago Police Superintendent David Brown. Shootings and killings are on the rise across the country as violent crime started to balloon in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic. 

Sliwa said he would have told Biden and law enforcement leaders that problems began in New York City when officials voted to slash the police budget amid the defund the police movement and when the “no bail” law was enacted, after which some suspected criminals are cut loose only to re-offend days or even hours later. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“There’s no reason to even have judges,” he said. “They can’t make a decision about flight risk. They can’t make decisions as to whether the individual charged is a danger to themselves or anyone else.”

As of Sunday, New York City experienced 225 reported homicides, 10 more than in the same time frame last year, according to police figures. Shootings are also up, with 803 this year versus 623 last year as of July 11, the New York Police Department said. 

Read original article here

Will Smith almost wasn’t cast in Independence Day

The cast of Independence Day (and director Roland Emmerich, second from the right) at the film’s premiere in 1996.
Photo: JEFF HAYNES/AFP via Getty Images

It’s not hard to peg Roland Emmerich and Dean Devlin’s Independence Day as the moment Will Smith went from “Will Smith, well-known rapper and potentially promising sitcom actor” to “Will Smith, no further qualifiers needed.” Building off the previous year’s Bad Boys, Independence Day transformed Smith into the go-to Hollywood blockbuster star of the next several years, comfortable with comedy and action alike. But, as revealed in a new Hollywood Reporter oral history of the film, it almost didn’t happen—because studio executives were convinced that international movie markets wouldn’t respond to a Black lead.

Or, as remembered by Devlin: “You cast a Black guy in this part, you’re going to kill foreign [box office].” But the writer-producer and his directing partner put their feet down, stating that they just might take their project over to Universal (which had bid heavily on the film’s explosive script) if they didn’t get their choice of leads. (It eventually turned out that, hey, international audiences would go see a movie with a Black man in the lead part, to the tune of a record-shattering performance.) It’s one of several fascinating stories from the oral history, which also includes Jeff Goldblum waxing nostalgic about talking jazz with Brent Spiner, early ideas to have Kevin Spacey play the film’s heroic president, and a number of odd asides from Randy Quaid (including that the film “had no press tour” and that he won a bundle playing at a casino during the shoot).

The primary focus is on Devlin and Emmerich, though, who track the whole history of the project, from the rush to beat Tim Burton’s similarly-themed Mars Attacks to theaters, to the fight to use the movie’s big White House explosion in commercials, to eventually sitting in the White House, hanging out with Bill and Hillary Clinton as they watched the film. (Also, apparently Bill Pullman’s big speech was a placeholder; Devlin always assumed he’d re-write it, but never got around to it before it had to be shot.)

All in all, it’s a fantastic read, culminating in a recounted conversation with Steven Spielberg, who praised the duo’s film, declaring—correctly, as Steven Spielberg so often has been—You guys reinvented the blockbuster. After this movie, nobody can do a normal blockbuster anymore.”

Read original article here

Jamie Spears Says He Wasn’t the One Making Britney’s Life Miserable

Read original article here

Kassidi Kurill’s death likely wasn’t caused by vaccine

Utah’s chief medical examiner urged the public not to jump to conclusions about the death of a 39-year-old woman four days after she received the second dose of Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine — insisting there is no evidence the jab was connected to her passing.

After receiving her second jab on Feb. 1, Kassidi Kurill became sick and was hospitalized. Four days later, the single mom died under mysterious circumstances.

But Dr. Erik Christensen, chief medical examiner for Utah’s Health Department, told Fox News that the tragic mom’s second dose and her death are only “temporally related.”

“We don’t have any evidence that there are connections between the vaccines and deaths at this point,” he insisted. “We don’t have any indication of that.”

Christensen said side effects from inoculations are to be expected, but that how people respond to the vaccine will ultimately be determined by their biology.

“Certainly, there are side effects of a vaccine that are directly linkable to the vaccine and what’s going on in your body,” Christensen said. “You know, the pain in the arm … the fever-like symptoms related to your immune response to what was put into you. Those kinds of things clearly happen.”

Dr. Erik Christensen, chief medical examiner for Utah’s Health Department, said Kassidi Kurill’s second vaccine dose and her death are only “temporally related.”
Facebook

Kurill, who received the vaccine due to her work as a surgical tech, experienced a sore arm after the first dose, but had no other side effects, her father, Alfred Hawley, told KUTV.

But things took a tragic turn after she received her second dose when she soon became ill and ended up in a hospital, where doctors determined that her liver was failing, Hawley said.

She died 30 hours later.

The Food and Drug Administration requires that vaccination providers report any deaths after COVID-19 jabs to the Vaccine Adverse Report System, which shows that there have been four deaths reported involving Utah residents, according to Fox News.

One of the four matches Kurill’s age, while the other three were all in their 80s, the outlet reported.

Utah’s Health Department told Fox News that the Office of the Medical Examiner will “investigate any death where the COVID-19 vaccine is mentioned on the death certificate.”

However, there is currently no evidence that the jab is dangerous.

An autopsy was performed on Kassidi Kurill, but privacy laws have kept the state Medical Examiner’s Office from commenting.
Facebook

“There is no evidence COVID-19 vaccines have caused any deaths in Utah. Reports of adverse reactions and death following vaccination do not necessarily mean the vaccine caused the reaction or death,” it said.

“Reports of concern are verified and undergo scientific study. The CDC also follows up on any report of death to request additional information and learn about what occurred and to determine whether the death was a result of the vaccine or unrelated.”

Christensen said that cases involving post-vaccine deaths are worth investigating, but added that until we know all the results, it’s just “speculation.”

An autopsy was performed on Kurill’s body, but the state Medical Examiner’s Office could not comment on it due to privacy laws.

Read original article here

The AI research paper was real. The “co-author” wasn’t

Getty Images

David Cox, the co-director of a prestigious artificial intelligence lab in Cambridge, Massachusetts, was scanning an online computer science bibliography in December when he noticed something odd—his name listed as an author alongside three researchers in China whom he didn’t know on two papers he didn’t recognize.

At first, he didn’t think much of it. The name Cox isn’t uncommon, so he figured there must be another David Cox doing AI research. “Then I opened up the PDF and saw my own picture looking back at me,” Cox says. “It was unbelievable.”

It isn’t clear how prevalent this kind of academic fraud may be or why someone would list as a co-author someone not involved in the research. By checking other papers written by the same Chinese authors, WIRED found a third example, where the photo and biography of an MIT researcher were listed under a fictitious name.

It may be an effort to increase the chances of publication or gain academic prestige, Cox says. He says he has heard rumors of academics in China being offered a financial reward for publishing with researchers from prestigious Western institutions.

Whatever the reason, it highlights weaknesses in academic publishing, according to Cox and others. It also reflects a broader lack of rules around the publishing of papers in AI and computer science especially, where many papers are posted online without review beforehand.

“This stuff wouldn’t be so harmful if it didn’t undermine public trust in peer review,” Cox says. “It really shouldn’t be able to happen.”

Cox, who directs the MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab, a collaboration that explores fundamental challenges in AI, was credited as a co-author on two papers in the niche journal Cluster Computing. One paper concerned a machine-learning method for protecting mobile networks from cyberattack; another outlined a networking scheme for a smart transportation system in Macau.

The paper identified by WIRED, about another smart transportation project, listed as one author “Bill Franks,” allegedly a professor in MIT’s electrical engineering department. There is no Bill Franks in MIT’s electrical engineering department. The paper, which appeared in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, showed a bio and photograph for a real MIT professor, Saman Amarasinghe, alongside the bogus name. Amarasinghe did not respond to requests for comment via email and an MIT spokesperson.

“The article in question has been retracted”

All three papers have since been retracted, and the publishers say they are investigating. But Cox was angered that the journals would publish something so obviously fake in the first place. He says IEEE quickly retracted the paper listing Bill Franks.

“Our investigation found evidence of a violation of IEEE’s policies, and, in accordance with our editorial procedures, the article in question has been retracted,” says Monika Stickel, director of corporate communications and brand marketing at IEEE.

But Cox says it wasn’t until he threatened legal action that Springer Nature, the publisher of Cluster Computing, removed his name from the two papers and issued a retraction. He was told that the journal had received an email confirming him as an author, although that came through a Hotmail address.

“The fundamental challenge that we face is that publishing has, for decades, functioned based on trust,” says Suzanne Farley, research integrity director at Springer Nature. “Unfortunately, it has become clear that there are some individuals and groups who are intent to deceive and abuse this trust, as well as cases in which there are honest mistakes and misunderstanding.”

Farley says sometimes academics do not use an institutional email address, in which case efforts are made to confirm that the address and the author are legitimate.

According to Retraction Watch, a website that tracks cases of academic fraud, one of the Chinese authors, Daming Li, a researcher affiliated with the City University of Macau, blamed the situation on a junior author, Xiang Yao, who is affiliated with a company Zhuhai Da Hengqin Science and Technology Development. Li told the publication that Yao added Cox’s name after “listening to his good ideas” and said the researcher had been fired. Li and Yao did not respond to emailed requests for comment.

Ruixue Jia, a professor at UC San Diego who has studied Chinese academia, says the authors may have wanted to “fake some international collaboration, which is often encouraged by universities.”

“Fabricating the appearance of scholarly dialog”

In an earlier example of academic fraud, more than 1,000 papers were retracted between 2012 and 2015 because one or more of the peer reviewers turned out to be fake, according to Retraction Watch.

Cox says the incident shows how poor the quality of some published academic work is. “In some sense, I think what happened to me was the system working ‘as it should,’” he says. “The whole thing is about fabricating the appearance of scholarly dialog.”

Brent Hecht, a researcher at Microsoft and Northwestern University who focuses on ethical issues around computer science, says the lax approach is broader. Many papers are first published without peer review on arXiv, a server where researchers can read the latest work. He notes that without peer review the affiliations of authors on these papers can serve as a proxy for legitimacy and quality. “Science works on an economy of credit, so when credit is improperly assigned or gained, everyone loses,” Hecht says.

This story originally appeared on wired.com.

Read original article here

Kourtney Kardashian shares own lingerie pic after she ‘wasn’t invited to’ photoshoot with her sisters

Kourtney Kardashian refuses to feel left out.

After not being featured in a recent photoshoot with siblings Kendall and Kylie Jenner and sister Kim Kardashian, Kourtney decided to take matters into her own hands — sharing a mirror selfie on Friday.

The snapshot sees the Poosh founder posing in red lingerie while sitting inside a walk-in closet adorned with shoes, as well as various pieces of lingerie scattered across the floor. Kardashian was also seen rocking a lengthy braid and a skull and bones necklace.

“Since I wasn’t invited to the sister shoot …,” Kardashian, 41, jokingly wrote on Instagram, referencing her sisters’ photoshoot for Kim’s latest SKIMS line. The shoot notably featured Kim, Kendall and Kylie all wearing red lingerie for Valentine’s Day.  

KOURTNEY KARDASHIAN POSES FOR SIZZLING SWIMSUIT SHOOT

Kourtney Kardashian shared a lingerie pic after not being invited to her sisters’ photoshoot.
(Photo by Dave Kotinsky/Getty Images for Sugar Factory American Brasserie)

Kardashian’s fans were quick to shower the “Keeping Up with the Kardashians” star with praise and support.

“UR THE HOTTEST SISTER QUEEN,” one commenter wrote. “You weren’t invited because you are the best sister,” another user wrote.

“Because they know u stole the show [heart],” said one commenter.

KYLIE JENNER FACES BACKLASH FOR LAVISH PARTY THAT APPEARS TO FLOUT CORONAVIRUS RULES: ‘DON’T GIVE A DAMN’

Kim Kardashian (left) teamed up with her younger sisters Kendall Jenner (center) and Kylie Jenner (right) to promote her new lingerie line on Feb. 7.
(Getty Images)

Despite not being invited to her family photoshoot, Kardashian is feeling loved in another way.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER

The mom-of-three and Blink-182 drummer Travis Barker, 45, seemingly confirmed their relationship on Tuesday with a vague Instagram post from Kardashian, which features the two holding hands after Valentine’s Day weekend.

Furthermore, the couple have received the blessing from their respective families after news of their relationship broke.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“They have big modern families [and they] both are dedicated to their kids,” an insider explained to Us Weekly. “They come from these modern families with modern relationships. Both of their families are supportive. It’s still very new, but they are both very excited by how easy it all has been.”



Read original article here

Alex Smith says “country wasn’t ready” for Colin Kaepernick

CLOSE

SportsPulse: Mackenzie Salmon connected with Hall of Fame safety Ed Reed to get his thoughts on the NFL’s new social justice messaging that will be featured on end zones this year. Reed was pretty blunt about what ‘messages’ mean at this point.

USA TODAY

While reflecting on a season with former San Francisco 49ers teammate Colin Kaepernick, Alex Smith says Kaepernick’s absence from football is a tragedy. 

“It’s so tragic looking at it. I think (Kaepernick) was ahead of his time, certainly trying to call out social injustice, especially around police reform,” said the Washington Football Team quarterback on The Ringer’s podcast 10 questions with Kyle Brandt.

“The country wasn’t ready,” said Smith. “Nobody was ready for it. And he’s sitting there trying to tell everybody through a completely peaceful manner about some of the things going on in this country that had been going on for a long time, and to see the backlash that happened, it hurts. It hurts looking back at it. The country wasn’t ready for it, and he suffered the repercussions.”

When Kaepernick took a knee in 2016 during the national anthem to peacefully protest police brutality and systemic racism in America, he faced national backlash. Kaepernick became a free agent at the end of the 2016- 2017 season after opting out of his 49ers contract and has not played a down in the NFL since.

Smith recalls Kaepernick as a quiet, respectful and talented teammate, saying “it still doesn’t make sense” that Kaepernick is no longer playing in the league. 

Smith, 36, and Kaepernick, 33, played together in San Francisco in 2011 and 2012. Kaepernick was the 49ers starting quarterback in 2012, the year they reached the Super Bowl. In his first NFL playoff start, Kaepernick led the 49ers to an NFC West division win against the Green Bay Packers, rushing for an NFL record of 181 yards. Kaepernick went on to lead the 49ers to a championship win against the Atlanta Falcons before falling short in Super Bowl 47 against the Baltimore Ravens. 

“The run that he went on at the end of that last year when we were together and then went to the Super Bowl… was so crazy to watch,” said Smith. “Truly one of the historic runs in football. It’s crazy to fast forward only a couple later that he was out of the league. Couldn’t even grasp it. Couldn’t understand it. It still doesn’t make sense.”

“Obviously, he was incredibly brave and I’m certainly proud of him, to even know him and what he has done,” said Smith. “He lost his livelihood. Probably one of the guys, I felt like had the brightest future ahead of him. Fast forward a few years later and I think we all were like, ‘he obviously was trying to tell us something and knew it.’ To see what has happened this last year and hopefully will continue to happen going forward. You hope that (Kaepernick) will be apart of the answer and the solution.

Contact Analis Bailey at aabailey@usatoday.com or on Twitter @analisbailey.

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Last SlideNext Slide



Read original article here

‘1000-Lb. Sisters’ Star Tammy Wasn’t Rejected By Jerry Over Pansexuality



Read original article here

The Ultimate News Site