Tag Archives: Warren

Warren Buffett praises AAPL stock in annual letter

Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. published its highly-anticipated annual letter this morning, offer details on the conglomerate’s investments in 2020. In this year’s letter, Buffett touted that Apple ranks as Berkshire’s biggest common stock investment, even though the conglomerate sold 9.81 million shares of AAPL at the end of 2020.

Warren Buffett on AAPL:

Buffett touts AAPL as a stock that “vividly illustrates the power of repurchases.” Berkshire first began acquiring Apple stock in late 2016 and it currently holds $120 billion worth of the stock, at a cost of $31.1 billion.

Berkshire’s investment in Apple vividly illustrates the power of repurchases. We began buying Apple stock late in 2016 and by early July 2018, owned slightly more than one billion Apple shares (split-adjusted).

When we finished our purchases in mid-2018, Berkshire’s general account owned 5.2% of Apple.

Buffett also says that Berkshire sold a small portion of its AAPL stake at the end 2020, pocketing $11 billion. Because of Apple’s buybacks, however, which reduce the total number of outstanding shares, Berkshires ownership of AAPL has increased to 5.4% despite that sale:

Since then, we have both enjoyed regular dividends, averaging about $775 million annually, and have also – in 2020 – pocketed an additional $11 billion by selling a small portion of our position.

Despite that sale – voila! – Berkshire now owns 5.4% of Apple. That increase was costless to us, coming about because Apple has continuously repurchased its shares, thereby substantially shrinking the number it now has outstanding.

This also has benefits for Berkshire shareholders, Buffett explains in the letter:

But that’s far from all of the good news. Because we also repurchased Berkshire shares during the 21⁄2 years, you now indirectly own a full 10% more of Apple’s assets and future earnings than you did in July 2018.

As Bloomberg reports, Buffett resisted buying Apple stock for years because he said he failed to understand the technology company. Working with investing deputies Todd Combs and Ted Weschler, however, Berkshire expanded and has also since added other technology companies such as Amazon and Verizon.

AAPL is now one of Berkshire’s top three most valuable assets, aligning with his insurers and BNSF Railway, the American railroad purchase the conglomerate completed in 2010.

Nonetheless, even though Berkshire Hathaway is a major investor in Apple, Warren Buffett himself only switched from a flip phone to the iPhone last year. Buffett said at the time that Apple CEO Tim Cook spent “hours” teaching him how to use his new iPhone 11.

You can read the full Berkshire Hathaway annual letter right here.

Read more:

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.


Check out 9to5Mac on YouTube for more Apple news:

Read original article here

Warren Buffett blames $11 billion loss on a ‘mistake’

Even oracles make mistakes.

Berkshire Hathaway earned $42.5 billion in 2020, but on Saturday, CEO Warren Buffett admitted the conglomerate’s results for the year included a rare “mistake” — that cost the company $11 billion.

The Oracle of Omaha said in his annual letter to shareholders that his 2016 purchase of the company Precision Castparts went bad, forcing Berkshire to “write down,” or deduct, nearly $11 billion from its bottom line last year.

Buffett labeled the write-down on the company, “ugly.” And he blamed himself, saying it was “almost entirely the quantification of a mistake I made in 2016.”

Berkshire, based in Omaha, Nebraska, bought the aerospace manufacturing firm for $32 billion.

“I paid too much for the company,” Buffett, 90, wrote. “No one misled me in any way – I was simply too optimistic about PCC’s normalized profit potential.”

Berkshire Hathaway Chairman and CEO Warren Buffett, center, looks at products produced by Precision Castparts.
AP Photo/Charlie Riedel

With airlines worldwide flying far less over the last year due to the pandemic, the aerospace industry suffered from major disruption, making 2020 a rough year for PCC.

“Last year, my miscalculation was laid bare by adverse developments throughout the aerospace industry, PCC’s most important source of customers,” Buffett wrote.

Buffett stood his ground on the company and said he still believes over time it will earn good returns.

Attendees pass the Precision Castparts Corp. booth during the Berkshire Hathaway Inc. annual shareholders meeting in Omaha, Nebraska on April 30, 2016.
Bloomberg via Getty Images

“I was wrong, however, in judging the average amount of future earnings and, consequently, wrong in my calculation of the proper price to pay for the business,” Buffett said. “PCC is far from my first error of that sort. But it’s a big one.”

Berkshire Hathaway remains the most expensive stock on the market, with its lightly traded “A” shares closing Friday at $364,580, up about 6 percent since the start of the year. Its “B” shares, which were split off several years ago to create a more easily traded stock, settled Friday at $240.51, up about 7.5 percent this year.

Read original article here

Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Cuts Apple Stake And Buys These Drugmaker, Telecom Stocks Instead

TipRanks

2 “Strong Buy” Dividend Stocks Yielding at Least 7%

A number of factors are coming together in the market picture, and indicate a possible change in conditions in the mid-term. These include increases in commodity prices, specifically, oil prices, which have rallied recently. In addition, the January jobs numbers, released earlier this month, were disappointing at best – and grim, at worst. They, do, however, increase the chance that President Biden and the Democratic Congress will push a large-scale COVID relief package through to fruition. These factors are likely to pull in varying directions. The rise in oil prices suggests an upcoming squeeze in supply, while the possibility of further stimulus cash bodes well for fans of market liquidity. These developments, however, point toward a possible price reflationary climate. Against this backdrop, some investors are looking for ways to rebuild and defend their portfolios. And that will bring us to dividends. By providing a steady income stream, no matter what the market conditions, a reliable dividend stock provides a pad for your investment portfolio when the share stop appreciating. And so, we’ve opened up the TipRanks database and pulled the details on two stocks with high yields – at least 7%. Even better, these stocks are seen as Strong Buys by Wall Street’s analysts. Let’s find out why. Williams Companies (WMB) The first stock we’ll look at is Williams Companies, a natural gas processing firm based in Oklahoma. Williams controls pipelines for natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil gathering, in a network stretching from the Pacific Northwest, through the Rockies to the Gulf Coast, and across the South to the Mid-Atlantic. Williams’ core business is the processing and transport of natural gas, with crude oil and energy generation as secondary operations. The company’s footprint is huge – it handles almost one-third of all natural gas use in the US, both residential and commercial. Williams will report its 4Q20 results late this month – but a look at the Q3 results is informative. The company reported $1.93 billion at the top line, down 3.5% year-over-year but up 8.4% quarter-over-quarter, and the highest quarterly revenue so far released for 2020. Net earnings came in at 25 cents per share, flat from Q2 but up 38% year-over-year. The report was widely held as meeting or exceeding expectations, and the stock gained 7% in the two weeks after it was released. In a move that may indicate a solid Q4 earnings on the way, the company declared its next dividend, to be paid out on March 29. The 41-cent per common share payment is up 2.5% from the previous quarter, and annualizes to $1.64. At that rate, the dividend yields 7.1%. Williams has a 4-year history of dividend growth and maintenance, and typically raises the payment in the first quarter of the year. Covering the stock for RBC, 5-star analyst TJ Schultz wrote: “We believe Williams can hit the low-end of its 2020 EBITDA guidance. While we expect near-term growth in the NE to moderate, we think WMB should benefit from less than previously expected associated gas from the Permian. Given our long-term view, we estimate Williams can remain comfortably within investment grade credit metrics through our forecast period and keep the dividend intact.” To this end, Schultz rates WMB an Outperform (i.e. Buy), and his $26 price target suggests an upside of 13% in the next 12 months. (To watch Schultz’s track record, click here) With 8 recent reviews on record, including 7 Buys and just 1 Hold, WMB has earned its Strong Buy analyst consensus rating. While the stock has gained in recent months, reaching $23, the average price target of $25.71 implies it still has room for ~12% growth this year. (See WMB stock analysis on TipRanks) AGNC Investment (AGNC) Next up is AGNC Investment, a real estate investment trust. It’s no surprise to find a REIT as a dividend champ – these companies are required by tax codes to return a high percentage of profits directly to shareholders, and frequently use dividends as the vehicle for compliance. AGNC, based in Maryland, focuses on MBSs (mortgage-backed securities) with backing and guarantees from the US government. These securities make up some two-thirds of the company’s total portfolio, or $65.1 billion out of the $97.9 billion total. AGNC’s most recent quarterly returns, for 4Q20, showed $459 million in net revenue, and a net income per share of $1.37. While down yoy, the EPS was the strongest recorded for 2020. For the full year, AGNC reported $1.68 billion in total revenues, and $1.56 per share paid out in dividends. The current dividend, 12 cents per common share paid out monthly, will annualize to $1.44; the difference from last year’s higher annualization rate is due to a dividend cut implemented in April in response to the coronavirus crisis. At the current rate, the dividend gives investors a robust yield of 8.8%, and is easily affordable for the company given current income. Among AGNC’s bulls is Maxim analyst Michael Diana who wrote: “AGNC has retained a competitive yield on book value relative to other mortgage REITs (mREITS), even as it has out-earned its dividend and repurchased shares. While turmoil in the mortgage markets at the end of March resulted in losses and lower book values for all mortgage REITs, AGNC was able to meet all of its margin calls and, importantly, take relatively fewer realized losses and therefore retain more earnings power post-turmoil.” Based on all of the above, Diana rates AGNC a Buy, along with an $18 price target. This figure implies a ~10% upside potential from current levels. (To watch Diana’s track record, click here) Wall Street is on the same page. Over the last couple of months, AGNC has received 7 Buys and a single Hold — all add up to a Strong Buy consensus rating. However, the $16.69 average price target suggests shares will remain range bound for the foreseeable future. (See AGNC stock analysis on TipRanks) To find good ideas for dividend stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks’ Best Stocks to Buy, a newly launched tool that unites all of TipRanks’ equity insights. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the featured analysts. The content is intended to be used for informational purposes only. It is very important to do your own analysis before making any investment.

Read original article here

Warren Moon Sees 49ers, Colts & Jets As Frontrunners For Deshaun Watson

Read original article here

Elizabeth Warren slams SEC over ‘market manipulation’

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass.

Tom Williams | CQ-Roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images

Sen. Elizabeth Warren lambasted the Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday, blaming the regulator and its failure to act for a chaotic dayslong blitz of market speculation.

“We need an SEC that has clear rules about market manipulation and then has the backbone to get in and enforce those rules,” Warren said. “To have a healthy stock market, you’ve got to have a cop on the beat.”

“That should be the SEC,” she added. “They need to step up and do their job.”

The SEC did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

The senator from Massachusetts joined CNBC after wild swings forced popular trading app Robinhood to restrict access to the high-flying stocks at the center of the controversy.

Warren, a longtime critic of Wall Street, spoke to CNBC’s “Closing Bell” as individual traders took to Reddit, Twitter and other social media platforms to protest Robinhood’s move to curb trading. But she made clear that she isn’t a big fan of Robinhood, either.

Robinhood and similar firms, which offer signup incentives while forcing customers to sign arbitration clauses, don’t help create healthy market conditions she said.

Those arbitration clauses, she said, protect Robinhood “if it turns out that [it] really did cheat you. It’ll never be made public, there will be very little that you can do about.”

The public outrage toward Robinhood came after the California-based brokerage announced earlier on Thursday that it would bar customers from buying additional shares of companies including GameStop and move theater operator AMC Entertainment. It still allows customers to sell those stocks from their current portfolio.

Investors on the irreverent WallStreetBets Reddit led an effort to “squeeze” short sellers to cover their bets in such stocks and, as a result, have sparked a frenzy of volatile trading in recent sessions. Many of those retail investors sparked the short squeeze through Robinhood’s popular trading app.

Videogame retailer GameStop is up 250% so far this week, AMC is up 145% and headphone maker Koss, another “squeeze” target, is up a whopping 1,100%.

Robinhood’s decision, which it says was motivated by “extraordinary volatility in the markets,” sparked criticism from both sides of the political aisle.

For her part, Warren said she is skeptical of a narrative that would relate the current trading to a classic “David versus Goliath” story that pits a scrappy group of retail investors against a colossal, hedge-fund empire.

“That’s the problem: How do you know who’s manipulating the stock at this point?” she asked. “Are you entirely sure that there aren’t wealthy people on both sides? That hedge funds haven’t moved in on the side of the people who bid up the price of GameStop?”

Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., a progressive who represents Silicon Valley, called for “more regulation and equality” and questioned the fairness of preventing individuals from buying.

“While retail trading in some cases, like on Robinhood, blocked the purchasing of GameStop, hedge funds were still allowed to trade the stock,” Khanna said.

By buying GameStop or AMC equity or call options, retail investors have forced investors betting against the stock, known as short sellers and oftentimes hedge funds, to cover their positions by buying back shares in an effort prevent further losses.

When this occurs en masse, it can lead to a feedback cycle and a spike in a stock’s price.

Read original article here