Tag Archives: Veterinary medicine

Bird flu’s grisly question: how to kill millions of poultry

OMAHA, Neb. — The spread of a bird flu that is deadly to poultry raises the grisly question of how farms manage to quickly kill and dispose of millions of chickens and turkeys.

It’s a chore that farms across the country are increasingly facing as the number of poultry killed in the past two months has climbed to more than 24 million, with outbreaks reported nearly every day. Some farms have had to kill more than 5 million chickens at a single site with a goal of destroying the birds within 24 hours to limit the spread of the disease and prevent animals from suffering.

“The faster we can get on site and depopulate the birds that remain on site, the better,” Minnesota State Veterinarian Beth Thompson said.

The outbreak is the biggest since 2015, when producers had to kill more than 50 million birds. So far this year, there have been cases in 24 states, with Iowa the hardest hit with about 13 million chickens and turkeys killed. Other states with sizable outbreaks include Minnesota, Wisconsin, South Dakota and Indiana.

Farms faced with the need to kill so many birds turn to recommendations by the American Veterinary Medical Association. Even as it has developed methods to kill the poultry quickly, the association acknowledges its techniques “may not guarantee that the deaths the animals face are painless and distress free.” Veterinarians and U.S. Department of Agriculture officials also typically oversee the process.

One of the preferred methods is to spray water-based firefighting foam over birds as they roam around the ground inside a barn. That foam kills the animals by cutting off their air supply.

When foam won’t work because birds are in cages above the ground or it’s too cold, the USDA recommends sealing up barns and piping carbon dioxide inside, first rendering the birds unconscious and ultimately killing them.

If one those methods won’t work because equipment or workers aren’t available, or when the size of a flock is too large, the association said a last resort is a technique called ventilation shutdown. In that scenario, farmers stop airflow into barns, which raises temperatures to levels at which the animals die. The USDA and the veterinary association recommend that farmers add additional heat or carbon dioxide to barns to speed up the process and limit suffering by the animals.

Mike Stepien, a spokesman for the USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, said the techniques are the best options when it’s necessary to quickly kill so many birds.

Not everyone agrees.

Animal welfare groups argue that all these methods for quickly killing birds are inhumane, though they are particularly opposed to ventilation shutdown, which they note can take hours and is akin to leaving a dog in a hot car. Animal rights groups delivered a petition last year signed by 3,577 people involved in caring for animals, including nearly 1,600 veterinarians, that urged the veterinary association to stop recommending ventilation shutdown as an option.

“We have to do better. None of these are acceptable in any way,” said Sara Shields, director of farm animal welfare science at Humane Society International.

Opponents of the standard techniques said firefighting foam uses harmful chemicals and it essentially drowns birds, causing chickens and turkeys to suffer convulsions and cardiac arrest as they die. They say carbon dioxide is painful to inhale and detectible by the birds, prompting them to try to flee the gas.

Karen Davis, of the nonprofit group United Poultry Concerns, urged the veterinary association to stop recommending all of its three main options.

“They’re all ways that I would not choose to die, and I would not choose anybody else to die regardless of what species they belong to,” Davis said.

Shields said there are more humane alternatives, such as using nitrogen gas but those options tend to be more expensive and could have logistical challenges.

Sam Krouse, vice president of Indiana-based MPS Egg Farms, said farmers feel miserable about using any of the options.

“We pour our lives and livelihoods into taking care of those birds, and it’s just devastating when we lose any of those birds,” Krouse said. “Everything that we’re doing every day is focused on keeping the disease out and making sure that we’re keeping our hens as safe as possible.”

Once poultry are dead, farmers must quickly dispose of the birds. They usually don’t want to risk the chance of spreading the virus by transporting the carcasses to landfills, so crews typically pile the birds up into huge rows inside barns and combine them with other materials, such as ground up corn stalks and sawdust to create a compost pile.

After a couple weeks of decomposition, the carcasses are converted into a material that can be spread on cropland to help fertilize crops. In some cases, carcasses are buried in trenches on the farm or incinerated.

Read original article here

Raw Dog Food Might Be Driving the Spread of Dangerous Superbugs

Image: John Minchillo (AP)

Raw dog food contains alarming amounts of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, making it an under-appreciated “international public health risk,” according to new research.

Scientists, including those with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, have advised against the burgeoning trend of feeding raw food to pets, citing the risk of spreading germs like E.coli, Salmonella, and Listeria. New research presented at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases (ECCMID) highlights another danger posed by raw pet food: exposure to multidrug-resistant bacteria.

The team found upsetting levels of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in dozens of dog food products sourced from grocery stores and pet shops in Portugal. Some of these superbugs were found to be the same as those documented in European hospital patients, potentially exposing dog food as an “international public health risk,” as Ana Freitas, a co-author of the study and a researcher at the University of Porto in Portugal, said in a press release.

Drug-resistant bacteria are a significant health risk because they make minor scrapes and infections far more dangerous and sometimes even life threatening. Figures provided by the World Health Organization show that, globally, around 700,000 people die each year from these superbugs, and it’s a problem that’s only going to get worse. The WHO estimates that, by 2050, 10 million people will die each year from multidrug-resistant germs. Hence the importance of identifying the source of these pathogens and finding ways to prevent their ongoing spread.

“Raw meat-based diets are increasingly popular for feeding dogs, but the extent of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in raw dog food is rarely addressed globally,” wrote the scientists in a research letter published by the CDC.

To address this gap in knowledge, the team analyzed 55 samples of dog food sourced from shops in Portugal. These samples included 25 international and national brands and were categorized as wet, dry, semi-wet, treats, and raw-frozen, the latter of which included foods like duck, salmon, poultry, lamb, goose, beef, and veggies.

Of these samples, 54% contained traces of Enterococci. This bacterium is present in human intestines and vaginal tract, and also in soil and water, but it can “spread from one person to another through contact with contaminated surfaces or equipment or through person to person spread, often via contaminated hands,” according to the CDC.

Enterococci is becoming increasingly tolerant to antibiotics, including vancomycin, teicoplanin, and linezolid. In 2017, vancomycin-resistant Enterococci was responsible for about 54,500 infections and 5,400 deaths in U.S. healthcare settings.

All raw dog food sampled in the study contained multidrug-resistant Enterococci, whereas only three non-raw samples contained the bacterium. Over 40% of the Enterococci were found to be resistant to common antibiotics, such as erythromycin and tetracycline, as well as last-resort antibiotics such as vancomycin, teicoplanin, and linezolid.

The “diversity and rate” of Enterococci was “unexpectedly high,” the scientists wrote in the research letter. Genetic sequencing confirmed some of the germs as being of the same kind found in hospital patients in Germany, the UK, and the Netherlands, and also in livestock and wastewater in the UK. A related study from the same team, the details of which were also presented at the online meeting, suggests genes associated with multidrug-resistant bacteria are being passed to humans through dog food.

Another team from Portugal presented evidence at the same meeting showing that the mcr-1 gene—which helps bacteria resist antibiotics—is being passed between humans and their pets. This research paper, which still needs to be submitted to a science journal, presents a “nightmare scenario” in which mcr-1 is “combining with already drug-resistant bacteria to create a truly untreatable infection,” according to a press release.

Freitas and her colleagues warn that raw dog food could be an emerging vehicle of transmission of antibiotic resistance, and that’s because this type of food consists of many raw ingredients taken from different sources, including livestock animals involved in intensive farming, they write. “European authorities must raise awareness about the potential health risks when feeding raw diets to pets and the manufacture of dog food, including ingredient selection and hygiene practices, must be reviewed,” said Freitas in the release.

As for dog owners, they should wash their hands with soap and water immediately after handling pet food and after picking up dog poop, she added.

Good advice. And better still, stop feeding your pets raw meat.

Read original article here