Tag Archives: vaccinated

Among fully vaccinated, study shows Paxlovid does not shorten symptoms – University of Minnesota Twin Cities

  1. Among fully vaccinated, study shows Paxlovid does not shorten symptoms University of Minnesota Twin Cities
  2. Paxlovid Fails to Shorten COVID in Standard-Risk and Vaccinated At-Risk Patients Medpage Today
  3. Predictors of nirmatrelvir–ritonavir receipt among COVID-19 patients in a large US health system | Scientific Reports Nature.com
  4. Paxlovid is effective against Covid-19, but many people eligible for it are not getting it; it’s fre … The Lexington Times
  5. Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir Does Not Speed Alleviation of COVID-19 Symptoms HealthDay

Read original article here

Paxlovid didn’t shorten Covid symptoms in vaccinated adults, full trial results confirm – Endpoints News

  1. Paxlovid didn’t shorten Covid symptoms in vaccinated adults, full trial results confirm Endpoints News
  2. Among fully vaccinated, study shows Paxlovid does not shorten symptoms University of Minnesota Twin Cities
  3. Paxlovid Fails to Shorten COVID in Standard-Risk and Vaccinated At-Risk Patients Medpage Today
  4. Predictors of nirmatrelvir–ritonavir receipt among COVID-19 patients in a large US health system | Scientific Reports Nature.com
  5. Paxlovid is effective against Covid-19, but many people eligible for it are not getting it; it’s fre … The Lexington Times

Read original article here

All eligible people at Chicago migrant shelter have been vaccinated for measles in ‘unprecedented operation’ – CNN

  1. All eligible people at Chicago migrant shelter have been vaccinated for measles in ‘unprecedented operation’ CNN
  2. Measles outbreak in Chicago:10 cases reported, with spread to CPS schools Cooper Dual Language Academy, Armour Elementary WLS-TV
  3. Chicago moving forward with migrant shelter evictions amid measles outbreak at Pilsen site WGN TV Chicago
  4. 2 CPS students reported to have measles as new cases climb to 10, officials say Chicago Sun-Times
  5. Student at Cooper Dual Language Elementary Academy reported to have measles, CPS confirms Chicago Tribune

Read original article here

Duration of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine persistence and factors associated with cardiac involvement in recently vaccinated patients | npj Vaccines – Nature.com

  1. Duration of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine persistence and factors associated with cardiac involvement in recently vaccinated patients | npj Vaccines Nature.com
  2. Could baseline gut microbiota predict the immune responses elicited by COVID-19 vaccines? News-Medical.Net
  3. Antiviral peptide prevents SARS-CoV-2 from infecting host cells Medical Xpress
  4. Previous infection with seasonal coronaviruses does not protect male Syrian hamsters from challenge with SARS-CoV-2 Nature.com
  5. Intranasal vaccine shows promise against COVID variants in hamsters News-Medical.Net
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Flu turned deadly within 48 hours for this young family. Now they get vaccinated every year



CNN
 — 

Jessica Richman felt fear rush over her – again.

In October, she watched her 3-year-old daughter, Layla, become unusually lethargic, develop a high fever and start to have shortness of breath. It was a painful reminder of her other daughter, Cayden, who died of the flu in December 2014.

Cayden had been the same age as Layla.

“It was very similar symptoms to Cayden. So, of course, I jumped into high gear,” Richman said.

When Layla’s symptoms began on Halloween, Richman took her to an urgent care clinic in their hometown of Newport News, Virginia.

“Her heart rate was elevated. Her fever was very high. They kept her there for most of the afternoon to observe her,” Richman said. “I explained to the doctor that was there that I have lost a 3-year-old daughter to the flu, so this was very scary for me. He really took that to heart.”

Layla’s medical team diagnosed her with influenza and gave her Motrin for her fever and the antiviral Tamiflu to treat the infection.

“She felt better fairly quickly, within 24 hours,” Richman said.

Richman’s experience during this flu season was dramatically different than in 2014, when she lost her beloved Cayden.

One key difference: Cayden was unvaccinated in 2014. Layla got her vaccine in September.

“I really think that the vaccine played a big role,” said Richman, who serves as secretary for the nonprofit Families Fighting Flu.

Even though Layla became sick when she encountered the flu virus weeks after vaccination, “she recovered quickly,” Richman said, adding that no one else in their household – which also includes her husband, Matt, and their 6-year-old son, Parker – caught the flu from Layla.

All of them had been vaccinated before Layla’s illness.

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that at least 16,000 people have died of flu this season, and at least 79 deaths have been in children.

Seasonal flu activity continues to be very prevalent across the United States but has been declining in most areas in recent weeks. Still, public health officials encourage people to get their annual flu vaccine as the best way to protect against that virus.

Many people who don’t get their seasonal flu shot are not necessarily anti-vaccination. They simply might not have had the time. That was the case for Cayden in 2014.

That year, Richman and Cayden’s father got their flu shots, but Cayden’s vaccination had to be rescheduled because she had a cold at the time.

“Because I also at the time was ill-informed about the flu, I didn’t feel that it was super urgent to go and immediately get her flu shot as soon as she was well,” Richman said. “I kind of put it off.”

One Thursday some weeks later, Cayden wasn’t her usual talkative and bubbly self. The 3-year-old, affectionately known as CadyBug, was fatigued and developed a cough. She stayed home from daycare with her father, and he took her to the pediatrician’s office.

The doctor thought Cayden’s symptoms were probably from a cold virus and sent her home without testing for the flu, Richman said.

The next morning, Cayden still had a fever. She was coughing and kept asking for water. Her father took her back to the pediatrician’s office but was sent home again.

“No one tested her for the flu. No one seemed to think that this was flu,” Richman said. “She was sent home that Friday afternoon.”

When they got home, Cayden’s symptoms worsened.

“She deteriorated very, very fast. It was in a matter of hours,” Richman said. “It was very deep, shallow breaths. She was not breathing correctly.”

Richman said that she was driving home from work when she got a chilling phone call from Cayden’s father: Cayden had stopped breathing during her nap. He had called 911. Richman arrived home to find emergency vehicles in front of her house and paramedics working on Cayden.

“She could not be resuscitated at the house,” Richman said. “In the ambulance ride, they had not told me at the time that she could not be resuscitated, but I could tell because I was riding in an ambulance and there was no noise. So I knew that it was over.”

When Cayden died, her parents still had no idea that it was because of the flu.

“It wasn’t until we received an autopsy that I clearly understood that it was the flu that caused her lungs to fill with mucus until she could no longer breathe,” Richman said. “I had no idea what happened until we got the autopsy back.”

Before Cayden’s tragic death, her mother was unaware that the flu could turn fatal.

“I was completely taken aback,” she said. “I had no idea that that could ever happen.”

Nearly a decade later, Richman and her family get their flu shots together each year in remembrance of Cayden. They wear pink and share social media posts about it, using the hashtag #pinkforcadybug, since pink was Cayden’s favorite color.

The most common symptoms of flu are fever, body ache and shaking chills. In some cases, it can cause lower respiratory tract infections known as pneumonia or directly infect heart cells and brain cells, causing inflammation of those organs, Dr. Tara Vijayan, an infectious disease doctor at the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, said in an email.

She added that inflammation can result in the body’s own cells dying.

“More commonly, however, if the flu is going to cause severe disease it is because it disrupts the lining of the respiratory tract such that the lungs become more susceptible to other bacterial pneumonias,” Vijayan said. “Generally, those who are unvaccinated and have multiple medical problems or have lowered immune systems are at highest risk, but we have seen death in younger otherwise healthy people.”

She added that people older in age or who are pregnant are also at high risk of complications.

Treating patients with severe flu is a frequent but difficult experience for Dr. Ali Khan, who specializes in internal medicine at one of the primary care network Oak Street Health’s Chicago locations.

“It is an incredibly difficult infection to watch as a clinician,” Khan said, adding that flu infections can turn deadly when someone gets a superimposed bacterial infection like pneumonia or develops severe sepsis.

“We get folks who are coming in to hospitals with seizures or with encephalitis caused by the flu. Folks who are coming in with significant muscle injury and breakdown, like the kind that you get when you’re quite dehydrated and overly fatigued,” he said. “Suffice to say, I’ve seen this far too many times than I’d ever like to see as a clinician.”

It’s not too late to get this season’s flu shot if you haven’t done so, Khan said.

“We’re not out of the woods yet,” he said. “Absolutely, you can still get vaccinated.”

Vijayan had similar sentiments.

“Our flu rates were unexpectedly high in the late fall and it does seem to be leveling off, but I would absolutely be concerned about another rise in cases this winter,” she said. “It is absolutely not too late to get the flu shot.”

Read original article here

Merck’s COVID pill does not cut hospitalisation, death rates in many vaccinated adults

By Natalie Grover

LONDON (Reuters) – Merck & Co Inc’s COVID antiviral molnupiravir speeds up recovery but does not reduce the hospitalisation or death rate in higher-risk vaccinated adults, detailed data from a large study showed on Thursday.

The drug, which prevents the virus from replicating, generated nearly $5 billion in sales for the U.S. drugmaker in the first three quarters of 2022.

Preliminary data from the study, carried out in the winter of 2021-2022 when the Omicron variant was dominant, was unveiled in October. As a result, doctors are already considering limiting molnupiravir’s use, for instance, in Australia.

The latest results offer more detail and have been peer-reviewed.

The study, called PANORAMIC, compared the oral pill against standard treatment alone in people over 50 or those aged 18 and older with underlying conditions. They had been unwell with confirmed COVID for five days or fewer in the community setting.

When Merck originally tested molnupiravir, it was found 30% effective in reducing hospitalisations, but that was in unvaccinated patients.

In the latest study, led by University of Oxford researchers, nearly all of the more than 25,000 patients in the study had received at least three vaccine doses.

These results demonstrate that vaccine protection is so strong that there is no obvious benefit from the drug in terms of further reducing hospitalisation and deaths, said study co-author Jonathan Van-Tam from the University of Nottingham.

The drug was, however, effective in reducing viral load and can help hasten patient recovery by roughly four days, researchers estimated based on study data.

There might be circumstances in which molnupiravir could be useful, for instance, in under-pressure health systems where it could be used to help key workers back to work quicker, said co-chief study investigator Chris Butler from the University of Oxford.

But ultimately, those benefits need to be weighed against the drug’s cost, added co-chief study investigator Paul Little from the University of Southampton. The drug, which was developed with Ridgeback Biotherapeutics, is estimated to cost several hundred pounds for a five-day course.

“For the moment, I think you have to say that don’t use this drug in the general population, including those at slightly higher-risk,” said Little.

Extremely clinically vulnerable patients, although eligible to enroll in PANORAMIC, were encouraged to access COVID treatment directly from Britain’s National Health Service, so the molnupiravir findings are less applicable to highest-risk patients, authors wrote in the medical journal Lancet.

Last month, Britain’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended against the use of molnupiravir at current prices because the cost-effectiveness estimates are higher than what it considered an acceptable use of the national health system’s resources.

(Reporting by Natalie Grover in London; Editing by Richard Chang)

Read original article here

Vaccinated at Higher Risk of COVID-19 Infection: Studies

People who have received COVID-19 vaccines are more likely to get infected than those who are unvaccinated, according to two new studies.

In one paper (pdf), from Cleveland Clinic researchers, each successive dose heightened the incidence of infection. The lowest incidence was among the unvaccinated.

In the other study, researchers in Indiana found that vaccinated people had a higher incidence of infection when compared to unvaccinated people who have natural immunity, or protection from surviving an initial infection.

The studies are the latest to find low or even negative effectiveness against infection among the vaccinated. A growing number of experts are pointing to immune imprinting, or suggesting it could be a cause. The term refers to how an immune system can be locked in by exposure to an early version of a virus, thus hindering its response to mutated versions. The COVID-19 vaccines target only the original virus strain apart from the updated boosters, which target both that strain and the BA.4/BA.5 subvariants of the Omicron variant.

Old vaccines “may have trained the immune response to expect a specific narrow pre-omicron challenge; thus, the response was inferior when the actual challenge was an immune-evasive omicron subvariant,” Qatari researchers wrote in a recent paper (pdf), which found a booster dose lowered the protection against infection.

Cleveland Clinic Paper

In their paper, a preprint published by medRxiv, Cleveland Clinic researchers analyzed data from clinic employees to arrive at estimates of vaccine effectiveness. The retrospective cohort study looked at data from Sept. 12, when the new boosters became available, through Dec. 12.

Researchers not only found the updated vaccines provide poor protection, but the “unexpected” result that people who received more doses of either version of the shots had an increased risk of infection.

“A simplistic explanation might be that those who received more doses were more likely to be individuals at higher risk of COVID-19. A small proportion of individuals may have fit this description. However, the majority of subjects in this study were generally young individuals and all were eligible to have received at least 3 doses of vaccine by the study start date, and which they had every opportunity to do,” wrote the researchers, including Dr. Nabin Shrestha.

“Therefore, those who received fewer than 3 doses (>45% of individuals in the study) were not those ineligible to receive the vaccine, but those who chose not to follow the CDC’s recommendations on remaining updated with COVID-19 vaccination, and one could reasonably expect these individuals to have been more likely to have exhibited higher risk-taking behavior. Despite this, their risk of acquiring COVID-19 was lower than those who received a larger number of prior vaccine doses.”

The researchers noted that multiple other studies, including the Qatari paper, have offered similar results.

“We still have a lot to learn about protection from COVID-19 vaccination, and in addition to a vaccine’s effectiveness it is important to examine whether multiple vaccine doses given over time may not be having the beneficial effect that is generally assumed,” they said.

Researchers did not look at the effectiveness against severe illness or hospitalization.

No funding sources for the study were listed. Under “funding,” researchers listed, “none.”

“It’s important to note that the study was done in a younger, relatively healthy, healthcare employee population. It included no children, very few elderly individuals and likely few immunocompromised individuals. Therefore, we urge caution in generalizing the findings to the public, which can include different populations than was in this study,” a spokesperson for the clinic told The Epoch Times via email.

“The study found that the longer it has been since last exposure to the virus by infection or vaccination, the higher the risk of acquiring COVID-19. It also found that the higher the number of vaccine doses an individual previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19. It is unclear at this time why this was observed and how it should be interpreted, and more research is needed to either confirm or refute this finding. It’s important to note that this paper has not yet been peer reviewed.”

Colorized scanning electron micrograph of a cell (purple) infected with a variant strain of SARS-CoV-2 virus particles (pink), isolated from a patient sample. (NIAID via The Epoch Times)

Indiana Paper

The Indiana researchers, including Dr. Shaun Grannis of the Regenstrief Institute, combed statewide testing and vaccination data as well as medical records to match individuals to compare incidence of infection, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths. The observational study, which only included people aged 12 and older with at least one previously recorded health care encounter with the Indiana Network for Patient Care between Jan. 1, 2016, and early 2022, crunched data from between Nov. 29, 2020, and Feb. 9, 2022.

The researchers estimated the incidence of COVID-19 was higher among the vaccinated when compared with the unvaccinated but naturally immune. Six months after the index date—30 days after an initial infection or 30 days after a vaccination—the cumulative infection rate was 6.7 percent among the vaccinated and just 2.9 percent among the previously infected. The rate remained higher among the vaccinated in all age groups when the results were stratified by age.

“Interestingly, at least in the study population and at [the] time of this analysis, natural immunity appears more effective in preventing new infections, a finding that is also reported in an earlier observational study,” the researchers said, pointing to an April paper from Israeli researchers. They theorized that vaccinated people may be more likely to get tested for COVID-19, which would lead to vaccine effectiveness being underestimated.

The study also concluded that the vaccinated were better protected than the naturally immune against emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and mortality.

“The findings highlight the real-world benefits of vaccination and allude to the health consequences of SARS-CoV-2 after the initial exposure,” Grannis and his co-authors wrote.

The paper was published by the American Journal of Public Health, which is the publication of the American Public Health Association. No funding sources were listed.

Editor’s note: This story has been updated with a comment from the Cleveland Clinic.

Zachary Stieber is a senior reporter for The Epoch Times based in Maryland. He covers U.S. and world news.

Read original article here

Teen denied kidney transplant because she’s not vaccinated for COVID, say parents

Appearing on “Fox & Friends Weekend” on Saturday morning to discuss the dire medical dilemma their family is facing, the parents of a teenage girl who is not vaccinated against COVID-19 revealed that their daughter has been unable to move forward with the kidney transplant she needs at Duke University Hospital in Durham, North Carolina. 

Chrissy Hicks, the mom of 14-year-old Yulia Hicks, recounted her exchange about the issue with a medical official.

“I said, ‘So basically you’re telling us if she does not get the vaccine, then she’s not getting a transplant,'” Chrissy Hicks said. “And [the medical employee] said, ‘Yes, that is the one thing that is holding us up.’”

DR. BEN CARSON SPEAKS OUT AGAINST NEW BIVALENT COVID VACCINE FOR YOUNG KIDS 

Chrissy and Lee Hicks of North Carolina adopted their daughter Yulia from Ukraine nearly two years ago. 

The couple has eight biological children and three who are adopted, the program noted.

Yulia Hicks, a 14-year-old girl, reportedly has been denied a kidney transplant by a hospital because she is unvaccinated for COVID-19.
(Fox News)

The girl suffers from a rare degenerative kidney condition known as Senior Loken Syndrome, which requires a transplant, according to reports. 

Though she is not vaccinated against COVID, she has had the coronavirus — so the parents believe she’s protected by natural immunities.

Dad Lee Hicks said on Saturday morning, “We’ve been up front the entire time we’ve been seen at Duke, for the last two years, that we were not comfortable with the vaccine — with the COVID-19 vaccine. And so they knew all along that we were not comfortable with this.”

Though a 14-year-old girl is not vaccinated against COVID-19, she has had the coronavirus — so her parents in North Carolina are arguing their daughter is protected by natural immunities and should be able to move forward with a kidney transplant. The parents appeared on “Fox and Friends Weekend.”
(REUTERS/Emily Elconin)

The dad added, “And it wasn’t a requirement. It was … a recommendation, according to [the doctors] at first — until the very end.”

“They knew all along that we were not comfortable” with the COVID-19 vaccine, the parents said.

Lee Hicks said that their daughter received a “nine-hour [medical] workup” in October.

BULLIES IN WHITE COATS? ‘TOO MANY’ HEALTH CARE WORKERS EXPERIENCE TOXIC WORKPLACES, STUDIES SHOW

“And that’s when they [the doctors and hospital officials] decided or told us that this was going to be a highly recommended-slash-requirement for her to get a vaccine before she would get the transplant.” 

He added, “So the phone call … That’s when [the official] said it’s not a requirement, it’s [a] recommendation, but she cannot get the transplant without the vaccine.”

Health officials “said it’s not a requirement, it’s [a] recommendation, but she cannot get the transplant without the vaccine.”

Chrissy Hicks also said on “Fox & Friends Weekend,” “We have retained a lawyer … to help us fight Duke [Hospital].”

She added, “But we don’t want Yulia’s life caught up with the litigation. We’re hoping that a medical center can step forward and say, ‘Come here, we’ll give you the transplant without the vaccination.'”

The parents of Yulia Hicks, a 14-year-old girl, appeared on “Fox and Friends Weekend” on Saturday to discuss their daughter’s case. 
(Fox News)

The parents have set up a website for their daughter, they said — YuliaGrace.com.

“If there’s a medical center out there that will take [our daughter] as a patient, we would love for them to reach out to us,” Chrissy Hicks added. 

The mom also said, “We have 11 children. So it’s not really financially accessible for us to go on our own out of state to [get] the surgery.” 

“Hicks, who is originally from Ukraine, already had COVID and has recovered.”

Duke Children’s Hospital & Health Center, it notes on its website, is ranked among the top children’s hospitals nationally in nine specialties by U.S. News & World Report; it provides care for thousands of pediatric patients every year.

BABY FORMULA SHORTAGE WILL CONTINUE TO WREAK HAVOC ON FAMILIES IN NEW YEAR: ‘I’M BEYOND STRUGGLING’

Fox News Digital reached out to the hospital system on Saturday. 

Duke Health officials shared the following comment.

“Our hearts go out to all families coping with the serious illness of a loved one, and we are committed to making organ transplant accessible to as many eligible patients as possible,” the officials said. 

“To protect patient privacy, we cannot comment on individual cases.”

“We have provided more than 10,000 organ transplants since 1965,” they continued. “Eligibility for organ transplant is a complex medical determination informed by many health factors to ensure the best outcomes. These determinations are made in consultation with families and medical professionals and follow the latest medical evidence and regulatory guidelines that all transplant centers must follow.”

Duke Health said further, “To protect patient privacy, we cannot comment on individual cases.”

Yulia Hicks, a 14-year-old girl, was denied a kidney transplant because she was unvaccinated for Covid-19.
(Fox News)

Alex Berenson, a former New York Times investigative reporter, shared on his Substack this past Wednesday that the 14-year-old girl was refused a kidney transplant at Duke University Hospital because she was not vaccinated for COVID-19, as Outkick reported.

Outkick noted in its article that “according to Berenson, Yulia Hicks would need to get the vaccine before the hospital would perform her surgery. Hicks, who is originally from Ukraine, already had COVID and has recovered.” Berenson spoke to the girl’s parents. 

“Yes, it is strongly recommended all patients on the transplant list be fully vaccinated prior to transplantation.”

Many hospital systems around the country either recommend or require that patients on transplant lists be fully vaccinated prior to transplantation. 

The University of California San Francisco health system, for instance, contains “patient education” information that shares that guidance. 

“Yes, it is strongly recommended all patients on the transplant list be fully vaccinated prior to transplantation,” the site says. 

Human kidneys are shown in a cross-section view. “We encourage transplant recipients to get the COVID-19 vaccine when possible,” says one hospital. 
(iStock)

It adds, “Once a person is immunosuppressed at the time of transplant, response to a vaccine will be less robust than before.”

That site also says, “We strongly encourage that all eligible family and household members living with transplant recipients be vaccinated, including booster doses. Transplant recipients are likely to have a suboptimal response to the vaccine, so the best way for all close contacts to protect them is to be fully vaccinated.”

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR LIFESTYLE NEWSLETTER

In another example, the University of Maryland Medical Center in Baltimore, Maryland, says on its website that it “understands that transplant patients — both those already transplanted and those awaiting one — have specific questions related to the COVID-19 vaccine.”

It shares the following FAQ: “Should transplant patients get vaccinated?”

Its answer: “Yes. We encourage transplant recipients to get the COVID-19 vaccine when possible.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Massachusetts shares this note on its website: “Like most other transplant programs across the country, the COVID-19 vaccine is one of several vaccines and lifestyle behaviors that are required for patients awaiting solid organ transplant.”

It adds, “Transplant candidates must also receive the seasonal influenza and hepatitis B vaccines, follow other healthy behaviors, and demonstrate they can commit to taking the required medications following transplant.”

Read original article here

Ohio measles outbreak hits partially vaccinated kids, babies too young for shots

Enlarge / Child with a classic four-day rash from measles.

The measles outbreak in Ohio continues to swell, striking a total of 63 children to date. The tally now includes at least three children who were partially vaccinated against the highly contagious virus and 14 who are typically too young to be vaccinated.

The measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine is a two-dose vaccine, with the first dose recommended between the ages of 12 months and 15 months and the second between ages 4 and 6. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, just one MMR dose is estimated to be 93 percent effective against measles. Two doses are 97 percent effective. People who get their two doses on the recommended schedule are considered protected for life.

It’s unclear if the three partially vaccinated children were too young to be eligible for their second dose or contracted measles quickly after getting their first dose, potentially before full protection developed. Health officials in the affected areas of Ohio have been promoting vaccination, which may have led some parents to get their eligible children freshly vaccinated amid the heightened awareness. The affected areas in Ohio span at least two counties: Franklin County, which encompasses Columbus, and Ross County to the south.

Most of the cases are in completely unvaccinated children who are in the age range eligible for at least one dose. Of the 63 total cases, 49 are between the ages of 1 year and 17 years, with most (29) between the ages of 1 and 2 years, according to a dashboard set up by the Columbus health department. At the time of this reporting, the dashboard was last updated on December 8. Of the 63 total cases, 60 were unvaccinated, with 46 being age 1 or older.

Twenty-five of the 63 cases have required hospitalization.

The outbreak, which began at the beginning of November among unvaccinated children without travel history that could explain exposure, is thought to be linked to four travel-related cases reported early in the year in Ohio. In addition to being a potentially life-threatening infection in young children, measles also suppresses immune responses for weeks to months after an infection, leaving children with heightened susceptibility to other dangerous infections.

Measles is considered eliminated in the US, in that it has not spread continuously in the country since at least 2000, though it is occasionally brought into the country via travel exposure. Slipping vaccination rates amid dangerous antivaccine misinformation and pandemic-related disruptions to health care now threaten the country’s status. The US nearly lost its elimination status in 2019 amid a lengthy outbreak.

In a press conference last week, Mysheika Roberts, public health commissioner for Columbus, said at least 25 percent of the area’s 2-year-olds are unvaccinated. She added that the health department is now working closely with the CDC and that the outbreak is expected to last for several months.

Read original article here

New Zealand takes custody of baby whose parents refused ‘vaccinated blood’

Comment

New Zealand’s High Court on Wednesday took custody of an infant whose parents insisted that he only receive blood from donors who had not been vaccinated against the coronavirus, a demand the court said prevented doctors from performing a lifesaving surgery.

The 6-month-old boy, referred to as “Baby W” in court filings, has been diagnosed with a congenital heart defect and needs surgery to survive, according to the court order.

“He remains in urgent need of an operation, and every day that the operation is delayed his heart is under strain,” the order said, citing one of his doctors.

Baby W’s parents, Cole Reeves and Samantha Savage, had insisted that he could only be operated on if the blood used in the surgery came from unvaccinated donors. Doctors said that using blood donated from outside the normal channels was “impractical” for the situation and that doing the surgery without donated blood was “not an available option.”

With time running out and the parents still objecting, Judge Ian Gault ruled that it was “in Baby W’s best interests” for the court to take custody of him temporarily until the surgery could be completed.

Baby W was placed under the guardianship of the court starting Wednesday until he recovers from surgery, but no later than the end of January. The surgery, which is set for this week, is estimated to take 48 hours to complete. Two doctors were appointed as Baby W’s legal representatives for the purpose of consenting to surgery, and Reeves and Savage were appointed as his representatives for “all other purposes.” Doctors said they would “take the parents’ views into consideration” whenever possible — as long as doing so wouldn’t compromise “Baby W’s interests.”

The decision followed a tense period of several weeks fraught with baseless claims, according to the order.

After Baby W underwent a procedure in late October, his parents “were distressed” when they learned that he had had to receive a “top up” of blood. They requested that in the future, an alternative be found, as they did not want their child to receive “any blood other than blood that did not contain the Pfizer vaccine, mRNA, the spike protein or any other associated contaminants,” the order said.

How wellness influencers are fueling the anti-vaccine movement

Reeves and Savage later told health-care workers at Starship hospital in Auckland that they believed spike proteins in the blood of people who had received mRNA vaccines — such as the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccines — were “causing unexpected deaths relating to transfusions.”

A meeting between Baby W’s parents and doctors in November was “hijacked by the parents’ support person” who spewed “her theory about conspiracies,” according to the order. The person claimed that infants who had received transfusions had died at Starship hospital.

Two days earlier, doctors had met with Savage to explain “that they could not spend more time considering” their requests that Baby W receive blood from special donors and that the parents would need to come to a decision whether to consent to the surgery. Savage “became extremely upset,” according to the order, and accused the doctors of “cornering her without any support present.”

Reeves and Savage appeared Wednesday on Infowars, the podcast hosted by conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, who filed for bankruptcy Friday after he was held liable for lies he spread about the victims of the 2012 mass killing at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.

“It’s so much bigger than us. It’s so much bigger than the baby. God does not want this to be perpetrated on mankind. He doesn’t want this to be perpetrated on the baby,” Reeves said as a baby babbled in the background.

“We stand from a godly point of view that this is not right,” he added.

Sue Grey, a representative for the parents and a self-proclaimed expert on medicinal cannabis and “biological harm from electromagnetic radiation,” did not respond to a request for comment. Grey has been known to spread baseless claims, especially about coronavirus vaccines. She told CNN in a statement that after “many hours” of consideration, Reeves and Savage had concluded that there was “no time to appeal,” adding that “the priority for the family is to enjoy a peaceful time with their baby until the operation, and to support him through the operation.”

Nikki Turner, medical director of the Immunisation Advisory Centre at the University of Auckland, said in an affidavit filed in the case that any components of the vaccine were unlikely to be present in donated blood and that regardless they would not be harmful.

Coronavirus vaccines, including those using mRNA technology, have repeatedly been shown to be safe and effective tools to combat severe illness from covid-19.

Read original article here

The Ultimate News Site