Tag Archives: US Dollar / Russian Ruble FX Spot Rate

Russia’s central bank cuts key interest, citing decreased stability risks

MOSCOW, Russia: The Russian central bank has cut its key interest rate by 300 basis points for a third time since its emergency hike in late February, citing cooling inflation and a recovery in the ruble.

KIRILL Kudryavtsev | AFP | Getty Images

The Central Bank of Russia on Thursday cut its key interest rate from 14% to 11%, citing a slowing in inflation and the recovery of the ruble.

Following an extraordinary meeting, policymakers opted for another 300 basis point cut, the Bank’s third since an emergency hike of the key rate from 9.5% to 20% in the immediate aftermath of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and the imposition of punitive sanctions by Western powers. At the time, the CBR also imposed strict capital control measures in a bid to mitigate the impact of sanctions and prop up the ruble.

“The latest weekly data point to a significant slowdown in the current price growth rates. Inflationary pressure eases on the back of the ruble exchange rate dynamics as well as the noticeable decline in inflation expectations of households and businesses,” the CBR said in a statement Thursday.

“In April annual inflation reached 17.8%, however, based on the estimate as of 20 May, it slowed down to 17.5%, decreasing faster than in the Bank of Russia’s April forecast.”

Having plunged to a record low of 150 against the U.S. dollar on Mar. 7, weeks after Russian troops began their unprecedented invasion of Ukraine, the CBR’s capital control measures have brought the currency surging back to a two-year high, briefly touching 53 rubles to the dollar on Tuesday.

The ruble weakened against the greenback on Thursday morning to trade at 60.80 to the dollar.

The CBR said Thursday that funds had continued to flow into fixed-term ruble deposits, while lending activity remains weak, limiting inflationary risks.

“External conditions for the Russian economy are still challenging, considerably constraining economic activity. Financial stability risks decreased somewhat, enabling a relaxation of some capital control measures,” the CBR added.

The central bank said future interest rate decisions would accommodate actual and expected inflation dynamics, relative to its target and efforts to transform the Russian economy for the long term, having previously warned that the economy must undergo a “large-scale structural transformation” to mitigate the impact of sanctions.

It suggested further rate reductions could be on the cards at upcoming meetings, the next of which will be held on June 10.

“According to the Bank of Russia’s forecast, given the monetary policy stance, annual inflation will decrease to 5.0–7.0% in 2023 and return to 4% in 2024,” the CBR added.

William Jackson, chief emerging markets economist at Capital Economics, suggested in a note Thursday that given that this was the second 300 basis point cut within a month, the CBR is unlikely to continue at this pace.

Notably, the language used in Thursday’s announcement, that the CBR “holds open the prospect” for further rate cuts, differed from the scheduled April meeting in which policymakers said the CBR “sees room” for cuts.

“Even so, the key point is that high oil and gas revenues are providing policymakers with a lifeline, allowing them to row back emergency economic measures. Against that backdrop, a further easing of capital controls and additional rate cuts seem likely,” Jackson said.

Read original article here

Russia is now exposed to a historic debt default: Here’s what happens next

Russian President Vladimir Putin attends the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) summit at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia May 16, 2022.

Sergei Guneev | Sputnik | via Reuters

The U.S. has announced that it will not extend an exemption permitting Moscow to pay foreign debt to American investors in U.S. dollars, potentially forcing Russia into default.

Up until Wednesday, the U.S. Treasury Department had granted a key exemption to sanctions on Russia’s central bank that allowed it to process payments to bondholders in dollars through U.S. and international banks, on a case-by-case basis.

This had enabled Russia to meet its previous debt payment deadlines, though forced it to tap into its accumulated foreign currency reserves in order to make payments.

However, the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control allowed the exemption to expire early Wednesday morning.

Russia has built up substantial foreign currency reserves in recent years and has the funds to pay, so will likely contest any declaration of default on the grounds that it attempted payment but was blocked by the tightened sanctions regime.

Moscow has a deluge of debt service deadlines coming up this year, the first being on Friday, when 100 million euros ($107 million) in interest is due on two bonds, one of which requires dollar, euro, pound or Swiss franc payment while the other can be serviced in rubles.

Reuters and The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that the Russian Finance Ministry had already transferred funds in order to make these payments, but a further $400 million in interest is due late in June.

In the event of a missed payment, Russia will face a 30-day grace period before likely being declared in default.

Russia has not defaulted on its foreign currency debt since the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917.

‘Unknown territory’

Central to the fallout from the OFAC’s decision not to extend the waiver is the question of whether Russia will consider itself to be in default.

Adam Solowsky, partner in the Financial Industry Group at global law firm Reed Smith, told CNBC on Friday that Moscow will likely argue that it is not in default since payment was made impossible, despite it having the funds available.

“We’ve seen this argument before where OFAC sanctions have prevented payments from going through, the sovereign issuer has claimed that they are not in default because they tried to make the payment and were blocked,” said Solowsky, who specializes in representing trustees on sovereign bond defaults and restructuring.

“They are potentially looking at a scenario of prolonged litigation after the situation has resolved as they try to determine if there was in fact a default.”

Solowsky highlighted that Russia’s situation is unlike the usual process for sovereign default, in which as a country nears default, it restructures its bonds with international investors.

“That’s not going to be feasible for Russia at this time because basically under the sanctions, nobody can do any business with them, so the normal scenario that we would see play out is not what we would expect in this case,” Solowsky said.

He added that this will affect Russia’s access to global markets and potentially drive up asset seizures both domestically and overseas.

“We’re getting into some unknown territory. This is a major world economy. I think we’ll be seeing the fallout effect from the next few days for many years,” Solowsky said.

Default ‘for years to come’

Timothy Ash, senior emerging markets sovereign strategist at BlueBay Asset Management, said in an email on Tuesday that it is only a matter of time now before Moscow defaults.

“The right move by OFAC as this move will keep Russia in default for years to come, as long as Putin remains president and/or leaves Ukraine. Russia will only be able to come out of default when OFAC allows it to. OFAC hence retains leverage,” Ash said.

“This will be humiliating for Putin who made a big thing with [Former Chancellor of Germany] Schroeder at the time Russia was last on the brink of a Paris Club default that great powers like Russia pay its debts. Russia can no longer pay its debts because of its invasion of Ukraine.”

Ash predicted that Russia will lose most of its market access, even to China, in light of the default, since Moscow’s only financing will come at “exorbitant” rates of interest.

“It means no capital, no investment and no growth. Lower living standards, capital and brain drain. Russians will be poorer for a long time to come because of Putin.”

Ash suggested that this would further Russia’s isolation from the global economy and reduce its superpower status to a similar level to “North Korea.”

‘Burning bridges’

Agathe Demarais, global forecasting director at The Economist Intelligence Unit, told CNBC on Friday that since Russia’s sovereign debt is low and was falling prior to the invasion, entering what the EIU sees as an inevitable default may not pose a huge problem for Russia.

“To me, it’s really a signal as to whether Russia thinks that all bridges have been burned with the West and financial investors. Normally if you’re a sovereign country, you do your utmost to avoid a default,” Demarais said.

“All the moves that we are seeing at the moment – at least to me – suggest that Russia isn’t really concerned about a default, and I think that is because Russia really expects that there isn’t going to be any improvement on the front of relationships with western countries any time soon.”

She added that the punitive sanctions against Russia from the U.S. and Western allies will likely remain in place “indefinitely,” since the Kremlin’s false characterization of the invasion as being a “denazifying” effort means it cannot easily U-turn.

The EIU anticipates a hot war throughout the year and protracted conflict thereafter, as Russia and the West attempt to reconfigure supply chains to adapt to the new sanctions regime rather than seeking ways to end it.

Russia is still attracting substantial amounts of cash from energy exports, and is attempting to force European importers to pay for oil and gas in rubles in order to swerve sanctions.

“What this really shows is this burning bridges strategy of Putin feels he has nothing to lose anymore,” Demarais added.

Read original article here

Russia central bank warns of ‘large-scale structural’ economic transformation

Russian President Vladimir Putin chairs a meeting with members of the Security Council via a video link at the Novo-Ogaryovo state residence outside Moscow, Russia February 18, 2022.

Mikhail Klimentyev | Sputnik | via Reuters

The Central Bank of Russia on Friday held its monetary policy steady and maintained its key interest rate at 20%, but warned of considerable uncertainty as the economy undergoes a “large-scale structural transformation.”

In late February, shortly after Russian forces invaded Ukraine, the CBR more than doubled the country’s key interest rate from 9.5% to 20% in an effort to prop up its plunging currency and mitigate the impact of tough international sanctions.

In its statement Friday, the CBR said the sharp increase in its key rate had “helped sustain financial stability.”

“The Russian economy is entering the phase of a large-scale structural transformation, which will be accompanied by a temporary but inevitable period of increased inflation, mainly related to adjustments of relative prices across a wide range of goods and services,” it said.

“The Bank of Russia’s monetary policy is set to enable a gradual adaptation of the economy to new conditions and a return of annual inflation to 4% in 2024.”

The ruble sank to record lows against the dollar on the back of a barrage of new sanctions and penalties imposed on Moscow by the U.S. and European allies, before moderating in recent weeks. The currency sat at just over 104 to the dollar following the decision on Friday.

Earlier this week, Russia managed to stave off a historic debt default by completing some of its sovereign bond payments in dollars, Reuters reported. The Russian finance ministry said on Friday that it had met its obligations to pay coupons on dollar-denominated eurobonds in full.

The CBR’s large quantities of foreign currency reserves were targeted by western sanctions that aimed to render them almost inaccessible, preventing policymakers from mitigating the depreciation in domestic assets.

Three takeaways

While the decision was expected, the central bank’s statement gave some insight into how it views the economic outlook for Russia at present.

William Jackson, chief emerging markets economist at Capital Economics, said there were three key takeaways, the first of which was that the central bank seems to think it has done enough with last month’s emergency hike to stabilize the financial system and prevent a run on Russian banks.

“Second, the CBR sees sanctions and a shift by the Russian government towards autarky and isolationism as something that is here for the long haul,” Jackson said, noting that the statement mentioned the “large-scale structural transformation” on several occasions.

“And third, despite that, policymakers at the CBR are trying to maintain a semblance of macroeconomic orthodoxy. The over-riding focus of the statement was on the balance of inflation risks and that monetary policy would remain tight to prevent second-round effects from the current inflation spike from taking hold.”

This may indicate that policymakers aim to roll back the current capital controls, revert to a floating ruble and return the focus of monetary policy to inflation-targeting eventually, Jackson suggested.

Read original article here

How much can — and will — China help Russia as its economy crumbles?

Russia’s President Vladimir Putin (R) shakes hands with his China’s counterpart Xi Jinping during a signing ceremony following the Russian-Chinese talks on the sidelines of the Eastern Economic Forum in Vladivostok on September 11, 2018. 

Sergei Chriikov | AFP | Getty Images

Sanctions, asset freezes and withdrawals of international companies are hammering the Russian economy in response to President Vladimir Putin’s military assault on Ukraine, leaving Moscow with only one ally powerful enough to rely on as a source of potential support: China.

“I think that our partnership with China will still allow us to maintain the cooperation that we have achieved, and not only maintain, but also increase it in an environment where Western markets are closing,” Russian Finance Minister Anton Siluanov said on Sunday. 

U.S. national security advisor Jake Sullivan, in response, said it had warned Beijing that there “will absolutely be consequences for large-scale sanctions, evasion efforts or support to Russia to backfill them.” On Monday, U.S. and Chinese diplomats discussed the issue over seven hours of talks. 

Siluanov had made reference to U.S.-led asset freezes on nearly half of Russia’s central bank reserves – $300 billion of the $640 billion in gold and foreign currency that it had amassed since a previous wave of Western sanctions following its annexation of Ukraine’s Crimea in 2014.

The remaining reserves are in gold and Chinese yuan, effectively making China Moscow’s main potential source of foreign exchange to back up the spiraling ruble amid devastating capital outflows.

In some of Beijing’s most explicit comments on the sanctions yet, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said Monday during a call with a European counterpart that “China is not a party to the crisis, nor does it want the sanctions to affect China.” He added that “China has the right to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests.”

Spokespersons for the China’s Dubai consulate, the Abu Dhabi embassy and the South African embassy were not immediately available for comment when contacted by CNBC.

How much could China help ease Russia’s economic pain? Quite a lot, theoretically.

If China decided to open up a full swap line with Russia, accepting rubles as payment for anything it needed to buy — including crucial imports like technology parts and semiconductors that Moscow has been cut off from in the latest rounds of sanctions — China could essentially plug most of the holes fired into Russia’s economy by the West. 

But whether that’s entirely in Beijing’s interest to do, and how much it could backfire, is another matter.

“In terms of to what extent China could help Russia, they could help them a ton,” Maximilian Hess, a Central Asia fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute, told CNBC. “But they would be risking major secondary sanctions on themselves, major renewed trade and sanctions war with the U.S. and the West as well.”

Given the uncertain state of Chinese markets over the last few weeks, amid mounting inflation and a major new Covid-19 outbreak in the country, “it might not be the best time to do that,” Hess said.

A ‘no-limits’ partnership

Still, Beijing does have a long-held alliance with Russia and can benefit from its position. 

Prior to the invasion, Beijing and Moscow announced a “no limits” strategic partnership they said was intended to counter U.S. influence. China’s position has been to ultimately blame the U.S. and NATO’s eastward expansion for the conflict, and on March 7 its Foreign Minister Wang Yi called Russia his country’s “most important strategic partner.”

“No matter how perilous the international landscape, we will maintain our strategic focus and promote the development of a comprehensive China-Russia partnership in the new era,” Wang said from Beijing. 

(China would) be taking all the liabilities and risks of the Russian economy onto their own balance sheet at a time when the Russian economy is at its weakest in decades

Maximilian Hess

Central Asia fellow, Foreign Policy Research Institute

And while China’s government has expressed “concern” over the conflict in Ukraine, it has refused to call it an invasion or condemn Russia, largely pushing Moscow’s narrative of the war on its state news outlets.

“China and Putin have a clear interest in working together more closely,” Holger Schmieding, chief economist at Berenberg Bank, wrote in an early March research note.

“China is happy to cause problems for the West and would not mind turning Russia gradually into its pliant junior partner.” It could also take advantage of its position to buy Russian oil, gas and other commodities at discounted prices, similar to what it’s been doing with Iran. 

To what extent China’s leadership steps in to support Moscow will play a key role in the future of Russia’s economy. China is Russia’s top export market after the European Union; trade between China and Russia reached a record high of $146.9 billion in 2021, up 35.9% year-on-year, according to China’s customs agency. Russian exports to China were worth $79.3 billion in 2021, with oil and gas accounting for 56% of that. China’s imports from Russia exceeded exports by more than $10 billion last year. 

“Russia can use China over time as a bigger alternative market for its raw material exports and a conduit to help circumvent Western sanctions,” Schmieding said.

“But for both countries with their very different perceptions of history, it could be an uneasy and fragile alliance that may not outlast Putin.”

The powerful alliance of the G-7 economies, composed of the U.S. and its European and Asian partners, can slap harsh secondary sanctions on any entity that supports Moscow. But the problem here is that China’s economy is the second-largest in the world and is a key part of global supply chains. It impacts global markets far more than Russia does. Any move to sanction China would mean much greater global effects, and likely economic pain for the West, too.  

Treading a middle path on sanctions?

Beijing likely seeks a “third way somewhere between the binary choice of supporting Russia or refusing to do so,” analysts at New York-based research firm Rhodium Group wrote in a note in early March. That middle path involves “quietly maintaining existing channels of economic engagement with Russia … while minimizing the exposure of China’s financial institutions to Western sanctions.” 

Indeed, in early March, the chairman of China’s banking regulator Guo Shuqing said that China opposed “unilateral” sanctions and would continue normal trade relations with the affected parties.

But maintaining that kind of economic engagement with Russia will be “hard to conceal under the current sanctions architecture,” Rhodium’s analysts wrote. 

Could Beijing keep letting Russia access and trade with its yuan reserves, which total around $90 billion, or about 14% of Russia’s FX reserves? Yes. But what if Beijing allowed Russia’s central bank to sell yuan-denominated assets for dollars or euros? That would likely expose it to sanctions.

China can still trade with Russian firms in rubles and yuan through the Russian banks that haven’t yet been sanctioned. But despite many years of working to increase bilateral trade in their own currencies, the vast majority of that trade – including 88% of Russian exports – is still invoiced in dollars or euros. 

Not only that, but China could be essentially catching a falling knife by taking on the credit and sanctions risks of Russia’s rapidly deteriorating economy. 

“China could alleviate the vast majority of the pain,” Hess said. “But if they offered those swap lines and everything, effectively they’d be taking all the liabilities and risks of the Russian economy onto their own balance sheet at a time when the Russian economy is at its weakest in decades.” 

“So that’s maybe not the wisest move economically,” Hess said. “But politics are different decisions.”

Read original article here

Russia-Ukraine war has hit currencies hard. Here’s what analysts expect next

A man views a digital board showing Russian rouble exchange rates against the euro and the US dollar outside a currency exchange office. On March 2, 2022, the Russian rouble hit record lows with the US dollar and the euro rates reaching 110 and 122 at the Moscow Exchange respectively.

Mikhail Metzel | TASS | Getty Images

LONDON — Currency markets have not escaped the steep losses and wild swings seen across other asset classes in recent weeks, and strategists are changing their game plans in light of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

The Deutsche Bank Currency Volatility Index climbed toward 10% on Tuesday morning in Europe, its highest level since April 2020, in the early stages of the Covid-19 pandemic.

The euro gained 0.4% against the dollar on Tuesday as some of the flight to safe-haven assets moderated, but was still down more than 4% against the greenback since the war began, as conflict intensified and focus switched to the looming threat to European energy supplies. The common currency slid more than 1% on Monday to conclude its largest three-day slide since March 2020.

Euro slide

In a note Friday, Goldman Sachs co-heads of global FX, rates and EM strategy, Zach Pandl and Kamakshya Trivedi, said the Wall Street giant’s constructive outlook on the euro was now off the table as long as military conflict continues.

Goldman’s models suggest that the downgrade to growth expectations across the euro zone subtracted around 1% from the EUR/USD currency pair last week, while an increase in the Europe-wide risk premium – the extra returns an investor can expect for taking on more risk – was worth almost 4%.

“Despite the sharp fall in EUR/USD, these models suggest the currency should be trading somewhat lower—around 1.07-1.08—given the moves in other market variables,” Pandl and Trivedi said.

Although they noted that estimates should be approached with caution, the models suggested that the euro is relatively strong against the Polish zloty (PLN), Swedish krona (SEK), U.S. dollar (USD), Hungarian forint (HUF) and British pound (GBP), while somewhat weak against the Swiss franc (CHF).

“In our view this suggests that EUR/USD and EUR/GBP are the most appropriate crosses for new hedges for Ukraine-related risks,” the strategists said, noting that EUR/CHF has been highly responsive to Ukraine developments thus far, owing to the Swiss franc’s status as a traditional safe haven.

However, the risk of the Swiss National Bank intervening to halt the currency’s appreciation has “likely risen now,” they added.

The military conflict cast broad uncertainty over the region’s macroeconomic outlook, but Pandl and Trivedi suggested that even if spillovers damage the euro area’s growth prospects, it would not necessarily result in sustained euro depreciation, as the European Central Bank may worry about the impact on inflation, while governments may respond to the crisis with fiscal easing.

“Moreover, if Euro Area growth holds up reasonably well and the ECB remains on track to raise rates this year, we would still see a bullish structural outlook for the currency,” they said.

“For now we stay on the sidelines in EUR crosses while we await more clarity on the unfolding geopolitical crisis.”

BMO Capital Markets noted that the smaller downturn in the euro compared to other European currencies is partly due to the high level of liquidity in the EURUSD exchange rate.

“The backdrop points to a period of less inward investment into Europe from abroad, weaker economic growth due in part to rising inflation, and a further deterioration in the trade balance due to the high price of oil,” BMO strategists said.

“Therefore, we wouldn’t judge the move in EURUSD as being over-extended yet from a fundamental perspective.”

Ruble and Eastern Europe

The Russian ruble has lost more than 64% to the dollar year-to-date to reach a record low, in large part due to the surprising severity of western sanctions imposed on Russia and its financial system, which aimed to isolate Moscow from the global economy.

Central to the size of the decline last week, according to BMO, was the effective freeze on the Central Bank of Russia’s ability to use its masses of foreign exchange reserves, the majority of which were denominated in euros and held with EU banks.

The favorable starting point of Russia’s external position prior to the invasion, the lack of a full and immediate ban on EU imports of Russian fossil fuels, and CBR’s doubling of the benchmark interest rate to 20% have somewhat mitigated the size of the move in USDRUB,” said BMO foreign exchange chiefs Greg Anderson and Stephen Gallo.

“However, we cannot be sure that the screen price for USDRUB reflects the true price that Russian citizens and businesses might be forced to pay for USDs if they were to attempt to liquidate their RUB now.”

Russian stock markets have been closed for the past week and are expected to remain so at least through Tuesday. While the global foreign exchange market is not formally closed to ruble trading, BMO said the sanctions have rendered the currency “highly illiquid.”

Alongside the ruble, the currencies of former Soviet satellite states have also plunged, with PLN, HUF and Czech koruna (CZK) down between 8-12% since the days leading up to the invasion.

BMO suggested the magnitude of the moves indicates capital flight from these currencies.

“This capital flight is likely coming from both worried local citizens as well as global investors. Liquidity in these currencies is extremely poor, which leaves room for volatility to persist,” Anderson and Gallo said.

“Poland is the #1 destination for Ukrainian evacuees and it is a key part of the network of supply routes whereby goods and arms are being transported into Ukraine, so PLN seems particularly vulnerable to volatility and disruptions depending on how the war progresses.”

Read original article here

Wall Street analysts share hedging tactics as Russia-Ukraine tensions mount

A service member of the Ukrainian armed forces takes part in tactical military exercises at a training ground in the Rivne region, Ukraine February 16, 2022.

Ukrainian Presidential Press Service via Reuters

Assets across the spectrum have been affected by the geopolitical tensions, including oil and natural gas, wheat, the Russian ruble and safe havens such as gold, government bonds, the Japanese yen and the Swiss franc.

Philipp Lisibach, chief global strategist at Credit Suisse, told CNBC earlier this week that any confirmed de-escalation would give a boost to risk assets after a period of uncertainty and volatility.

“If we have, let’s say, a resolution in terms of the geopolitical issues that we currently face, I would imagine that the global economy takes a breather, risky elements of the market can certainly recover, the cyclicality and the value trade should probably do well, and European equities particularly that have come under pressure, we assume that they can continue to outperform, so we would certainly look into that angle specifically,” Lisibach said.

‘General geopolitical hedges’

Given the vast array of possible outcomes to the current standoff, investors have been reluctant to set forth a base case scenario, opting instead for careful portfolio hedging to mitigate the potential downside risks of a Russian invasion, while capturing some of the upside in the event of a de-escalation.

“We would rarely look to position for material geopolitical risk, as it’s so opaque. That said, we do have some general geopolitical hedges in the portfolio, principally gold and, depending on the source of the risk, some oil exposure, as well as, of course, some government bonds, though with reduced duration,” said Anthony Rayner, multi-asset manager at Premier Miton Investors.

Bhanu Baweja, chief strategist at UBS Investment Bank, argued earlier this week that outside of energy and Russian assets, markets had actually not priced in a great deal of risk.

“We have seen equities come off a little bit, but if you look at consumer durables — because that is the one sector or subsector that would definitely be impacted through weaker growth and higher inflation — in Europe that sector is doing much better than it is in the U.S.” he said.

Baweja added that U.S. high yield debt is also underperforming that of Europe, while the euro has remained relatively steady.

Markets are tracking the “playbook from 2014,” Baweja suggested, when Russia first invaded Crimea and the subsequent levying of sanctions against Russia through the summer.

“Through that period what really happened was some parts of CEE FX got impacted, oil rose a little bit in the first iteration, came down in the second one, so not a lot happened in stocks, so really it became quite a local event,” Baweja told CNBC on Tuesday.

“This time it seems much more serious, but I don’t think investors want to completely upend their way of thinking and probably want to look for hedges, rather than completely changing their core portfolio.”

FX seen as the best hedge

In terms of hedging, Baweja suggested that with equity and bond volatility already high due to central bank speculation, investors should look to foreign exchange markets, where volatility is still relatively low.

“Similar to 2014, I would be looking at CEE (Central and Eastern Europe) FX, places like dollar-Pole (zloty) or dollar-Czech (koruna), for hedges,” he said.

“Russian assets themselves have moved a lot so they along with energy are pricing a lot of risk, which also means if the situation becomes better, then you really shouldn’t see global equities seeing massive relief from that, you should see Russian assets going up and energy coming down.”

If the situation escalates, Baweja suggested hedging through FX rather than buying defensive stocks or favoring U.S. assets over Europe.

“If we have to do it within equities, we think DAX and European banks are probably the best hedges,” he added.

While equity markets in Russia and around the world continue to look sensitive to geopolitical developments, the ruble has remained relatively robust around the 75 mark against the dollar, despite some volatility.

Luis Costa, head of CEEMEA FX and rates strategy at Citi, told CNBC on Thursday that flows into the ruble are likely to render it the most resilient Russian asset class, with high energy and gas prices pointing to strong current account surpluses in Russia.

“And let’s not forget Russia used to buy FX, they used to buy dollars as a derivative on the fiscal law, and they stopped the purchase of dollars about a month ago in order to support the currency,” Costa said.

“This is making natural flows in Ruble even more positive for the currency, so we think that – in the whole asset array of Ruble risk, of Russia risk, credit, rates, bonds and FX – FX will continue to be the most resilient part of the puzzle here.”

Read original article here