Tag Archives: Uncrewed

Blue Origin rocket suffers problem during uncrewed launch

Blue Origin’s New Shepard rocket suffered a serious problem after lifting off Monday morning, forcing the vehicle’s emergency abort system to jettison the capsule away from the booster.

No people were on board — only science experiments — in what was supposed to be another in a series of suborbital flights to the edge of space and back. The company, which is owned by Jeff Bezos, also uses the New Shepard system to fly paying customers and has flown several human missions since Bezos himself flew on the first crewed flight last year. (Bezos owns The Washington Post.)

Leading up to the launch, Blue Origin flight controllers called a series of holds, delaying the flight. It lifted off shortly before 10:30 a.m. Eastern from the company’s launch site in Van Horn, Tex. After clearing the launch tower, it entered what is known as “Max Q,” or the moment when aerodynamic pressure is greatest on the vehicle as it pushes through the atmosphere on the way to space.

Suddenly, at about 1 minutes 5 seconds into flight, bright flames burst from the booster and the capsule’s emergency abort system kicked in, quickly shooting it away from the rocket. The capsule’s parachutes later deployed, and it landed softly in the West Texas desert.

During a live broadcast of the event, Erika Wagner, Blue Origin’s payload sales director, said: “It appears we’ve experienced an anomaly with today’s flight. This was unplanned and we don’t have any details yet. But our crew capsule was able to escape successfully.”

On Twitter, Blue Origin wrote: “We’re responding to an issue this morning at our Launch Site One location in West Texas. This was a payload mission with no astronauts on board. The capsule escape system functioned as designed. More information to come as it is available.”

Blue Origin has said repeatedly that it designed the vehicle to ensure safety, and before it flew any people, it rigorously tested the capsule’s emergency escape system on the ground and twice during flight. During one test, they simulated a parachute failure so that the spacecraft landed under two parachutes instead of three.

“Safety is our highest value at Blue Origin,” Wagner said. “It’s why we built so much redundancy into the system.”

In an interview last year, Gary Lai, the senior director of the New Shepard design team, said that the “flights are just kind of the tip of the iceberg — the part that floats above the water that people can see. We test the vehicle on the ground, the components, the software, many, many more times than we fly them. Up to the point where when we do the flight tests we’re actually pretty confident it’s going to work.”

On board the capsule were 36 payloads from schools, universities and organizations, including the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. It was the fourth flight for New Shepard this year, and the ninth flight for the reusable vehicle, which the company said is dedicated to flying science and research to space.

In all, Blue Origin has flown 31 people to space and was hoping to fly more this year. That will be on hold, while the company investigates what went wrong on Monday’s flight.

The mishap comes as the Federal Aviation Administration and National Transportation Safety Board have been working to clarify who investigates spaceflight crashes. Last week, the agencies signed an agreement detailing how they’ll work together in the event of a mishap. The NTSB would be the lead agency in any commercial space accidents that result in a fatal or serious injury to anyone, or if there is damage to property not associated with the launch.

In a statement, the FAA said it would oversee the accident investigation into Monday’s mishap, because “the capsule landed safely and the booster impacted within the designated hazard area. No injuries or public property damage have been reported.”

Before New Shepard can return to flight, the FAA “will determine whether any system, process, or procedure related to the mishap affected public safety,” it said.

In addition to Blue Origin, Virgin Galactic also aims to fly paying customers to the edge of space. Elon Musk’s SpaceX has flown a series of NASA astronaut crews to the International Space Station, as well as private astronaut missions. Boeing also plans to start flying astronauts early next year.

The industry has been lightly regulated, enjoying a mandate by Congress that commercial spaceflight is still in its infancy and therefore in a “learning period.” The emerging space companies should be allowed to innovate and grow, proponents say, before the government can impose strict rules that govern how they operate.

Read original article here

Starship uncrewed lunar lander test a “skeleton” of crewed lander

LAUREL, Md. — A SpaceX Starship that will land on the moon an on uncrewed test flight may only be a “skeleton” of the version of that will carry people on the Artemis 3 mission, NASA says.

In a presentation at the annual meeting of NASA’s Lunar Exploration Analysis Group (LEAG) here Aug. 23, Lisa Watson-Morgan, manager of the Human Landing System (HLS) program, said the Starship that performs that uncrewed landing demo mission won’t necessarily be identical to the vehicle that is used to transport astronauts to and from the surface of the moon on Artemis 3 as soon as 2025.

“For the uncrewed demo, the goal is to have a safe landing,” she said. “The uncrewed demo is not necessarily planned to be the same Starship that you see for the crewed demo. It’s going to be a skeleton because it just has to land. It does not have to take back off.”

“Clearly we want it to,” she added, referring to a takeoff, “but the requirements are for it to land.”

That uncrewed landing, scheduled for no earlier than 2024, is a key test ahead of the crewed Artemis 3 mission. Watson-Morgan said that the uncrewed landing will take place in the south polar regions of the moon, but no decisions have been made on a landing site, including whether it will be one of the 13 regions NASA announced Aug. 19 would be considered for the Artemis 3 mission. One factor in choosing a landing site, she said, was to “preserve science in the future” by not disrupting any Artemis 3 landing sites.

There will be an opportunity to do science on the uncrewed demo landing. That includes flying a suite of sensors and imagers “and potentially one payload,” she said, but didn’t specify what kinds of sensors or payloads might fly. The types of payloads NASA were interested in flying include those “that don’t require a tremendous amount of upkeep.”

However, she and others said they want to maximize the performance that Starship offers on lunar landings, with the potential to carry large payloads. While the original HLS competition had a requirement to carry only 100 kilograms of cargo to the surface and back in addition to two astronauts, said Logan Kennedy, HLS surface lead at NASA, the later “sustained” missions will increase that to 182 kilograms to the surface and 160 kilograms back, with a goal of 1,000 kilograms down and back.

“We’re going to leverage all that we can on this mission to try and take up and down as much as we can, using the size of their system,” Watson-Morgan said.

She said SpaceX has been a “fantastic partner” on HLS so far, with close cooperation between the company and the agency. SpaceX has been involved in the Artemis 3 landing site selection process to ensure potential landing regions are compatible with Starship. NASA, in turn, has its personnel, including astronauts, visiting SpaceX facilities for reviews and hardware tests.

That includes one of the unique attributes of Starship, the elevator required to go from the crew cabin to the surface. “It’s a very tall lander. It doesn’t look like the traditional landers that we’ve all seen in the past, so it can be hard to reconcile that mentally,” Watson-Morgan said.

She assured scientists at the meeting that the elevator design was robust, saying it was “multi-fault-tolerant” and designed for operating in lunar conditions. In his presentation, Kennedy showed images of a full-scale mockup of the elevator that SpaceX built for “crew-in-the-loop” tests, including ones where astronauts wore simulated spacesuits to test the ability to get in and out of the elevator.

Some aspects of the overall Starship lunar landing architecture, though, remain unclear. The concept of operations for the lander involves SpaceX launching a Starship into low Earth orbit that will serve as a fuel depot, which is filled by subsequent Starship launches that serve as tankers. The lunar lander Starship will then launch, fill its tanks at the depot, and head to lunar orbit.

Neither NASA nor SpaceX, though, have said exactly how many launches will be required for a single Starship lunar landing mission, an issue of contention during protests of the SpaceX HLS award last year by Blue Origin. “How many? However many is needed. That is how many we’ll launch,” Watson-Morgan said.

NASA’s requirements for HLS missions end once the astronauts are returned to Orion. “We don’t tell them to do anything with it,” Kennedy said of the fate of the Starship lander after returning astronauts from the lunar surface. “That’s going to be up to SpaceX.”

Read original article here

Uncrewed Artemis I mission to Moon pushed back

NASA’s giant SLS rocket will be used for the Artemis mission to take humans back to the Moon.

The first mission in NASA’s program to take humans back to the Moon has been delayed until spring at the earliest, the US space agency said Wednesday, saying it needed more time to complete safety checks.

The Artemis I launch, initially scheduled for late 2021 and then postponed twice more, will now happen no earlier than April.

“Teams are taking operations a step at a time to ensure the integrated system is ready to safely launch the Artemis I mission. NASA is reviewing launch opportunities in April and May,” NASA said in a statement.

Artemis I will be an uncrewed flight test, but will signal the real start of the program, which could eventually see the first woman and the first person of color to step foot on the Moon.

Artemis I also will be the first flight of the massive Space Launch System (SLS) rocket, which will carry the Orion capsule to the Moon, where it will be put into orbit before returning to Earth.

The testing of the SLS system, which had been set for this month, is now expected to take place at Kennedy Space Center in Florida in March, NASA said.

For that test, the rocket will be moved to the launch pad, fueled up and the launch sequence initiated—except for the actual take-off.

This test will then help the US space agency set an actual launch date.

There is no “specific” issue that sparked the additional delays, Tom Whitmeyer, the deputy associate administrator for exploration systems development at NASA Headquarters in Washington, told reporters.

“It could be something as simple as a scratch that needs to be polished out or some paint that needs to be fixed. There’s just a lot of that—it’s a really big vehicle,” he said.

A few months ago, a government audit indicated that Artemis I would likely take place “in the summer of 2022.”


NASA says glitch on Boeing rocket delays launch again


© 2022 AFP

Citation:
Uncrewed Artemis I mission to Moon pushed back (2022, February 2)
retrieved 3 February 2022
from https://phys.org/news/2022-02-uncrewed-artemis-mission-moon.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.



Read original article here

The Ultimate News Site