Tag Archives: triggered

Kourtney Kardashian Reveals Why Her Daughter Is ‘So Triggered’ By Tristan Thompson – Yahoo Entertainment

  1. Kourtney Kardashian Reveals Why Her Daughter Is ‘So Triggered’ By Tristan Thompson Yahoo Entertainment
  2. Why Kourtney Kardashian Says She and Penelope Are ‘TRIGGERED’ By Tristan Thompson Entertainment Tonight
  3. Tristan Thompson slammed for ‘inappropriate’ greeting to Kourtney Kardashian as star admits she’s ‘trig… The US Sun
  4. ‘I’m so triggered by him I can’t be around him’: Kourtney Kardashian opens up about sister Khloe’s cheating ex-boyfriend Tristan Thompson PINKVILLA
  5. Kourtney Kardashian, Daughter Penelope ‘Triggered’ by Tristan Thompson PEOPLE
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Kourtney Kardashian Says Her Daughter Penelope Is “Triggered” by Tristan Thompson – InStyle

  1. Kourtney Kardashian Says Her Daughter Penelope Is “Triggered” by Tristan Thompson InStyle
  2. Kourtney Kardashian, Daughter Penelope ‘Triggered’ by Tristan Thompson PEOPLE
  3. Kourtney Kardashian Asked Her Daughter If She Was OK With Tristan Thompson Being Around After Telling Her She’s “So Triggered” By Him, And Here’s What Khloé Had To Say BuzzFeed News
  4. Kourtney Kardashian’s Daughter Picked Up Her Tristan Thompson Dislike Us Weekly
  5. Kourtney Kardashian admits she’s ‘so triggered’ by Tristan Thompson after ‘horrible’ cheating scandals Page Six
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Chelsea Handler Responds To Tucker Carlson And Other Attacks On Her “Childless Woman” Sketch: “You Guys Seem So Triggered By Me” – Deadline

  1. Chelsea Handler Responds To Tucker Carlson And Other Attacks On Her “Childless Woman” Sketch: “You Guys Seem So Triggered By Me” Deadline
  2. Chelsea Handler Rips Tucker Carlson, Ben Shapiro After They Mocked Her for Having No Kids: ‘Who Needs Birth Control When Your Voice Is 100% Effective?’ Yahoo Entertainment
  3. Chelsea Handler Taunts ‘Hate-Masturbating’ Tucker Carlson Over Latest Meltdown HuffPost
  4. “Do we treat unmarried men this way?”: Chelsea Handler childless controversy explained Sportskeeda
  5. Chelsea Handler’s ‘Day in the Life of a Childless Woman’ TikTok Is Going Viral Yahoo Life
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Blazing meteorites from the outer solar system triggered life on Earth 4.6 billion years ago

Great balls of fire! Blazing meteorites from the outer regions of the solar system triggered life on Earth 4.6 billion years ago

Great balls of fire from the outer regions of the solar system brought the building blocks of life to Earth 4.6 billion years ago, a new study reveals.

Scientists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Imperial College London found these ancient meteorites contained carbonaceous chondrite, which consisted of potassium and zinc.

Potassium helps produce a cell’s fluids, while zinc is vital in creating DNA.

The team found that these space rocks made up ten percent of the space rocks that smashed into the planet during its birth.

The other 90 percent came from the inner solar system’s non-carbonaceous (NC) material. 

Life of Earth was triggered by fireballs that collided with the newly birthed planet 4.6 billion years ago

‘Our studies complement and confirm each other’s results in multiple ways,’ the study’s lead author Dr Nicole Nie told SWS.

‘Among moderately volatile elements, potassium is the least volatile while zinc is one of the most volatile elements.’ 

READ MORE: Mystery of the diamond-bearing meteorites is SOLVED 

 

Scientists from RMIT and Monash University in Australia have discovered that the diamonds were formed in an ancient dwarf planet from our solar system. 

<!- - ad: https://mads.dailymail.co.uk/v8/de/sciencetech/none/article/other/mpu_factbox.html?id=mpu_factbox_1 - ->

Advertisement

The meteorites provided 20 percent of Earth’s potassium and half its zinc.

Both are considered volatiles, which are elements or compounds that change from a solid or liquid state into vapor at relatively low temperatures.

Senior author Professor Mark Rehkämper, of Imperial College London’s Department of Earth Science and Engineering, said in a statement: ‘Our data show that about half of Earth’s zinc inventory was delivered by material from the outer Solar System, beyond the orbit of Jupiter. 

‘Based on current models of early Solar System development, this was completely unexpected.’ 

Previous research suggested that the Earth formed almost exclusively from inner Solar System material, which researchers inferred was the predominant source of Earth’s volatile chemicals.

However, the new study provides the first evidence that Earth formed partly from carbonaceous meteorites from asteroids in the outer main belt. 

‘This contribution of outer Solar System material played a vital role in establishing the Earth’s inventory of volatile chemicals,’ said Rehkämper.

‘It looks as though without the contribution of outer Solar System material, the Earth would have a much lower amount of volatiles than we know it today – making it drier and potentially unable to nourish and sustain life.’ 

The team analyzed 18 meteorites,11 from the inner region and the rest traveled from the outer areas.

The meteorites contained potassium and zinc and traveled from the outer regions of the solar system

And then, they measured the relative abundances of zinc’s five different forms – or isotopes. 

They then compared each isotopic fingerprint with Earth samples to estimate how much these materials contributed to the Earth’s zinc inventory, showing that Earth only incorporated about ten percent of its mass from carbonaceous bodies. 

 The researchers found that material with a high concentration of zinc and other volatile constituents is also likely to be relatively abundant in water, giving clues about the origin of Earth’s water.

Read original article here

Chronic pain conditions can be triggered by human emotions, research shows

Common illnesses ranging from sciatica, Fibromyalgia and other chronic pain conditions can be triggered by human emotions, leading researchers have suggested.

Georgie Oldfield MCSP, from Huddersfield, who runs SIRPA, a company set up in 2010 to teach health professionals and coaches to help individuals to tackle the underlying causes of chronic pain and other persistent symptoms, has worked as a physiotherapist since 1983.

The 62-year-old was employed by the NHS for decades before leaving the health service to become self-employed and run her own business and focus more on helping people with pain.

For years in the public and private sector, Mrs Oldfield dealt with patients who could not link their pain or recurring health problems to any physical cause.

Common illnesses ranging from sciatica, Fibromyalgia and other chronic pain conditions can be triggered by human emotions, leading researchers have suggested (file image: man with shoulder pain)

Mrs Oldfield told MailOnline: ‘It was not making sense that people were coming to me and going away pain free and they still had a prolapsed disc, for example.

‘Whereas for other people experiencing pain, they came with results from medical tests and scans, yet nothing could be found.

‘When I left the NHS in 2005, I had more time to consider this. I was reading around and talking to colleagues and was questioning so much and then in 2007,

‘I came across the work of Professor of Rehabilitation Medicine, Dr John Sarno in New York.

Mrs Oldfield (pictured) was employed by the NHS for decades before setting up SIRPA in 2010

For years she has dealt with patients who could not link their pain or recurring health problems to any physical cause

‘His hypothesis was that chronic pain was a mind-body condition with unresolved emotions manifesting as pain and other symptoms.

‘The work SIRPA teaches is constantly evolving as pain science now explains why treating the underlying causes of chronic pain, rather than the pain itself, is more likely to allow pain to resolve, rather just managing it.’

At an early stage it is important to rule out a physical cause for a person’s pain including cancer, infection, fracture or an auto-immune condition.

When a physical cause for pain has been ruled out it can be confusing, especially if an illness has come out of nowhere and disrupted someone’s daily life.

Mrs Oldfield said once the nervous system becomes oversensitive it can lead to a myriad of issues within the body

However, seemingly random pain is often linked to the triggering of repressed feelings such as anger, fear and frustration.

Once these emotions start to build up and reach a tipping point, they can make the nervous system oversensitive.

This can then result in a myriad of issues in the body and lead to conditions such as sciatica, migraines, whiplash, Fibromyalgia and tinnitus.

The sufferer, who lacks the understanding of the current science, may feel their pain is physical, and something is wrong in their tissues, muscles, nerves or bones.

The sufferer, who lacks the understanding of the current science, may feel their pain is physical, and something is wrong in their tissues, muscles, nerves or bones (Pictured: SIRPA conference) 

To make matters more confusing, they may even be told they have wear and tear or a slipped disc from a scan and believe this is the root cause of the problem.

But as researchers claim, this is an outdated and flawed model, with a growing body of evidence suggesting that people reporting no pain have had scans that show disc, joint and arthritic problems, showing that degeneration is just a normal part of ageing.

Pain – whether it be emotional or physical – is ultimately controlled in the same part of the brain.

When the research was in its infancy in 2007 these conclusions received pushback, but now there is more evidence to support these claims.

Pain – whether it be emotional or physical – is ultimately controlled in the same part of the brain (Pictured: a SIRPA conference)

Some patients with chronic pain, however, are sceptical and are adamant there must be something structurally wrong with them.

To change this attitude, we need to educate ourselves and update our beliefs about what pain is, according to Mrs Oldfield.

Major organisations such as the International Association for the Study of pain are starting to interpret it differently.

For them, pain is not only associated with actual damage but can ‘resemble’ it too.

Mrs Oldfield added: ‘What we do is help people address faulty beliefs/myths all the time, which isn’t easy and can take time.

When Mrs Oldfield’s research was in its infancy in 2007 these conclusions received pushback, but now there is more evidence to support these claims (Pictured: Mrs Oldfield on ITV)

‘We are affecting beliefs people have had for decades. However, we know the mind and the body are not separate and this is why part of our work is encouraging people to become more aware of what is happening in their body.

What can make pain worse is the six F’s which were laid out by Mrs Oldfield’s US colleague, clinician and researcher, Dr Howard Schubiner.

According to Dr Schubiner, chronic pain is often made worse due to Fear, Frustration, Focusing on the pain, attempting to Fix it, trying to Figure it out and Fighting it.

SIRPA researchers (pictured) have found that seemingly random pain is often linked to the triggering of repressed feelings such as anger, fear and frustration

Mrs Oldfield explained: ‘Evidence shows that fear of pain, even just worrying about it, can make it worse.

‘Also, the more we focus on pain, the more we fuel it. And if we try and fight it and push it away this can also make it worse.

‘Trying to fix it and googling it all the time as well as frustration makes it worse. But trying to figure out the pain exactly and overanalysing it can also make it worse.

‘I receive emails from people who say, ‘I’m battling with my pain every day’ but sadly this just creates resistance.

‘This is about self-compassion and surrendering to the pain, which is challenging for people to understand. However, if you surrender the pain will stop fighting you, like soldiers do if you surrender in war.’

To change this attitude, we need to educate ourselves and update our beliefs about what pain is, according to Mrs Oldfield

To improve one’s chronic pain requires working with the stress response, identifying and addressing any underlying causes, learning how to reprogramme the brain from a state of fear and protection to a state of safety.

Mrs Oldfield added: ‘Looking at a timeline of your life can be helpful to identify some of the issues, past and present, that may have been challenging for you and which were probably not acknowledged and addressed at the time.

‘Therapeutic journaling can be an effective way to help with this.’

Before starting to work on any unresolved emotions, though, Mrs Oldfield says she would always teach a client calm, connected breathing and how to ground themselves.

Major organisations such as the International Association for the Study of pain are starting to interpret it differently (Pictured: Catherine Pollitt, a physio on SIRPA’s Membership Board)

This helps the victim of pain feel more comfortable in acknowledging emotions which have started to surface.

And what’s more, it can help many feel safe at recognising their emotions once they start to surface.

For years people have avoided and distracted themselves because in early childhood we have learned it was not safe to express them.

So by becoming more emotionally aware, addressing faulty beliefs and unhelpful behaviours plus retraining our pain away from the learned and sensitised neural circuits, Mrs Oldfield says is possible to resolve chronic pain.

READ MORE:

Social media users left outraged by ‘frustrating NHS advice on ‘ways to manage chronic pain’ – which tells people to ‘exercise and ‘continue to work’ 

DR MICHAEL MOSLEY: The new ways to conquer chronic pain from gut microbe transplants to medical cannabis – no pills required! 

Can you THINK yourself out of pain? Doctor claims these five simple exercises can ease discomfort – from practising ‘3-4-5 breathing’ to writing down positive thoughts 

Read original article here

NFL’s chief medical officer says Tua Tagovailoa showed ‘nothing that would have triggered’ concussion protocol

Tua Tagovailoa’s visit to the concussion protocol drew tons of controversy – and it seems like history is repeating itself.

The Miami Dolphins quarterback is in concussion protocol for the second time this season after Sunday’s game against the Green Bay Packers – however, the league is saying he showed no signs of such an injury during the game.

Tagovailoa reported symptoms the day after the game, but the league’s chief medical officer, Dr. Allen Sills, said Tuesday in an interview with NFL Network that he showed nothing “that would have triggered the protocol” during the game.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

Miami Dolphins quarterback Tua Tagovailoa looks to the sidelines during the first half of an NFL football game against the Cincinnati Bengals, Thursday, Sept. 29, 2022, in Cincinnati. Tagovailoa suffered a second frightening injury in five days when he was carted off the field Thursday.
(AP Photo/Jeff Dean)

“What our spotters and our unaffiliated neuro doctors are looking for is any blow that transmits force to the head or neck area, followed by that injury behavior,” Sills explained. “And so, there are many blows to the head that occur during a game. We are always looking for the blow plus the injury behavior and obviously if we see any injury behavior, then there’s a call down made to evaluate that player. Also, if a player identifies any symptoms or a teammate, coach, official, anyone else identifies symptoms, that also initiates a protocol. So many people can initiate the protocol and in this game on Sunday, none of those factors were present. There were no visible signs present, even though there was a blow to the head and the player did not report any symptoms, despite being in contact with the medical staff throughout the game. So, there was nothing that would have triggered the protocol in the moment.”

Tua Tagovailoa #1 of the Miami Dolphins takes the field prior to a game against the Green Bay Packers at Hard Rock Stadium on December 25, 2022, in Miami Gardens, Florida.
(Megan Briggs/Getty Images)

AARON RODGERS THINKS DOLPHINS SHOULD CONSIDER SHUTTING TUA TAGOVAILOA DOWN FOR REST OF SEASON

It’s unknown when exactly Tagovailoa suffered the concussion, but it’s widely regarded he suffered it after he shoveled a pass to tight end Durham Smythe and was tackled from behind in the second quarter, resulting in his head smacking the grass at Hard Rock Stadium on Christmas Day. 

Tagovailoa remained in the game but it wasn’t pretty, as he threw three straight interceptions on Miami’s final three drives while the Packers scored 16 unanswered points to win 26-20 on the road to keep their playoff hopes alive.

That tackle was eerily similar to the hit he took in Week 3, where he was wobbly post-hit but played just three days later, then suffered a concussion that sent him to the hospital and forced the NFL to make changes to its protocol.

The hit to the head was so bad that Tagovailoa’s hands curled up on the field. Many speculated that he should’ve been in concussion protocol after that hit against the Bills. 

Instead, he practiced like normal leading up to the early game of the week.

Tua Tagovailoa #1 of the Miami Dolphins looks to pass against the Detroit Lions during the first quarter at Ford Field on October 30, 2022, in Detroit, Michigan.
(Rey Del Rio/Getty Images)

 CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Tagovailoa finished Sunday’s loss to the Packers 16 of 25 for 310 yards, one touchdown and three interceptions. He surpassed 200 yards in the first half alone after some long completions, including an 84-yard touchdown catch-and-run to Jaylen Waddle.

The 8-7 Dolphins currently sit as the seventh seed in the AFC playoff picture, but they have lost each of their last four games.

Fox News’ Scott Thompson contributed to this report.

Read original article here

More anti-COVID protests in China triggered by deadly fire

TAIPEI, Taiwan (AP) — Protests against China’s restrictive COVID-19 measures appeared to roil in a number of cities Saturday night, in displays of public defiance fanned by anger over a deadly fire in the western Xinjiang region.

Many protests could not be immediately confirmed, but in Shanghai, police used pepper spray to stop around 300 protesters who had gathered at Middle Urumqi Road at midnight, bringing flowers, candles and signs reading “Urumqi, November 24, those who died rest in peace” to memorialize the 10 deaths caused by a fire in an apartment building in Xinjiang’s capital city Urumqi.

A protester who gave only his family name, Zhao, said one of his friends was beaten by police and two friends were pepper sprayed. He said police stomped his feet as he tried to stop them from taking his friend away. He lost his shoes in the process, and left the protest barefoot.

Zhao says protesters yelled slogans including “Xi Jinping, step down, Communist Party, step down,” “Unlock Xinjiang, unlock China,” “do not want PCR (tests), want freedom” and “press freedom.”

Around 100 police stood line by line, preventing some protesters from gathering or leaving, and buses carrying more police arrived later, Zhao said.

Another protester, who gave only his family name of Xu, said there was a larger crowd of thousands of demonstrators, but that police stood in the road and let protesters pass on the sidewalk.

Posts about the protest were deleted immediately on China’s social media, as China’s Communist Party commonly does to suppress criticism.

Earlier Saturday, authorities in the Xinjiang region opened up some neighborhoods in Urumqi after residents held extraordinary late-night demonstrations against the city’s draconian “zero-COVID” lockdown that had lasted more than three months. Many alleged that obstacles caused by anti-virus measures made the fire worse. It took emergency workers three hours to extinguish the blaze, but officials denied the allegations, saying there were no barricades in the building and that residents were permitted to leave.

During Xinjiang’s lockdown, some residents elsewhere in the city have had their doors chained physically shut, including one who spoke to The Associated Press who declined to be named for fear of retribution. Many in Urumqi believe such brute-force tactics may have prevented residents from escaping in Thursday’s fire and that the official death toll was an undercount.

Anger boiled over after Urumqi city officials held a press conference about the fire in which they appeared to shift responsibility for the deaths onto the apartment tower’s residents.

“Some residents’ ability to rescue themselves was too weak,” said Li Wensheng, head of Urumqi’s fire department.

Police clamped down on dissenting voices, announcing the arrest of a 24-year-old woman for spreading “untrue information” about the death toll online.

Late Friday, people in Urumqi marched largely peacefully in big puffy winter jackets in the cold winter night.

Videos of protests featured people holding the Chinese flag and shouting “Open up, open up.” They spread rapidly on Chinese social media despite heavy censorship. In some scenes, people shouted and pushed against rows of men in the white whole-body hazmat suits that local government workers and pandemic-prevention volunteers wear, according to the videos.

By Saturday, most had been deleted by censors. The Associated Press could not independently verify all the videos, but two Urumqi residents who declined to be named out of fear of retribution said large-scale protests occurred Friday night. One of them said he had friends who participated.

The AP pinpointed the locations of two of the videos of the protests in different parts of Urumqi. In one video, police in face masks and hospital gowns faced off against shouting protesters. In another, one protester is speaking to a crowd about their demands. It is unclear how widespread the protests were.

The demonstrations, as well as public anger online, are the latest signs of building frustration with China’s intense approach to controlling COVID-19. It’s the only major country in the world that still is fighting the pandemic through mass testing and lockdowns.

Given China’s vast security apparatus, protests are risky anywhere in the country, but they are extraordinary in Xinjiang, which for years has been the target of a brutal security crackdown. A huge number of Uyghurs and other largely Muslim minorities have been swept into a vast network of camps and prisons, instilling fear that grips the region to this day.

Most of the protesters visible in the videos were Han Chinese. A Uyghur woman living in Urumqi said it was because Uyghurs were too scared to take to the streets despite their rage.

“Han Chinese people know they will not be punished if they speak against the lockdown,” she said, declining to be named for fear of retaliation against her family. “Uyghurs are different. If we dare say such things, we will be taken to prison or to the camps.”

In one video, which the AP could not independently verify, Urumqi’s top official, Yang Fasen, told angry protesters he would open up low-risk areas of the city the following morning.

That promise was realized the next day, as Urumqi authorities announced that residents of low risk areas would be allowed to move freely within their neighborhoods. Still, many other neighborhoods remain under lockdown.

Officials also triumphantly declared Saturday that they had basically achieved “societal zero-COVID,” meaning that there was no more community spread and that new infections were being detected only in people already under health monitoring, such as those in a centralized quarantine facility.

Social media users greeted the news with disbelief and sarcasm. “Only China can achieve this speed,” wrote one user on Weibo.

On Chinese social media, where trending topics are manipulated by censors, the “zero-COVID” announcement was the No. 1 trending hashtag on both Weibo, a Twitter-like platform, and Douyin, the Chinese edition of TikTok. The apartment fire and protests became a lightning rod for public anger, as millions shared posts questioning China’s pandemic controls or mocking the country’s stiff propaganda and harsh censorship controls.

The explosion of criticism marks a sharp turn in public opinion. Early on in the pandemic, China’s approach to controlling COVID-19 was hailed by its own citizens as minimizing deaths at a time when other countries were suffering devastating waves of infections. China’s leader Xi Jinping had held up the approach as an example of the superiority of the Chinese system in comparison to the West and especially the U.S., which had politicized the use of face masks and had difficulties enacting widespread lockdowns.

But support for “zero-COVID” has cratered in recent months, as tragedies sparked public anger. Last week, the Zhengzhou city government in the central province of Henan apologized for the death of a 4-month old baby. She died after a delay in receiving medical attention while suffering vomiting and diarrhea in quarantine at a hotel in Zhengzhou.

The government has doubled down its policy even as it loosens some measures, such as shortening quarantine times. The central government has repeatedly said it will stick to “zero COVID.”

Many in Xinjiang have been locked down since August. Most have not been allowed to leave their homes, and some have reported dire conditions, including spotty food deliveries that have caused residents to go hungry. On Friday, the city reported 220 new cases, the vast majority of which were asymptomatic.

The Uyghur woman in Urumqi said she had been trapped in her apartment since Aug. 8, and was not even allowed to open her window. On Friday, residents in her neighborhood defied the order, opening their windows and shouting in protest. She joined in.

“No more lockdowns! No more lockdowns!” they screamed.

___

Kang reported from Beijing.

Read original article here

The Arrival of Tree Roots May Have Triggered Mass Extinctions in The Ocean : ScienceAlert

The first land plants to evolve penetrating root systems, around 400 million years ago, may very well have triggered a series of mass extinctions in the ocean.

The expansion of plants onto terra firma was a big moment on Earth, completely restructuring the terrestrial biosphere. According to researchers from Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) in the US and University of Southampton in the UK, the consequences for our oceans might have been just as profound.

During the Devonian Period, which stretched from 360 million to 420 million years ago, the marine environment experienced numerous mass extinction events. A particularly destructive event towards the end of this period resulted in the extinction of up to nearly 60 percent of all genera in the ocean.

Some scientists think trees were the root cause of these losses.

As plant life moved away from water sources, they dug ever deeper for new sources of nutrients. At some point their roots would have begun to pull phosphorus from minerals locked up underground.

Once the tree decays, those nutrients within its biomass dissolve more easily into groundwater, which eventually winds up in the sea.

In the Devonian, as root systems grew more complex and moved further inland, more and more phosphorus would have been dumped into the marine environment.

A new timeline of these nutrient pulses speaks to their destruction. The data is based on the chemical analysis of stones from ancient lake beds and coastlines in Greenland and Scotland.

“Our analysis shows that the evolution of tree roots likely flooded past oceans with excess nutrients, causing massive algae growth,” explains IUPUI earth scientist Gabriel Filippelli.

“These rapid and destructive algae blooms would have depleted most of the oceans’ oxygen, triggering catastrophic mass extinction events.”

While scientists have suspected tree roots of playing a role in Devonian mass extinctions before, this study is one of the first to calculate the magnitude and timing of phosphorus delivery from land to water.

From site to site, researchers found differences in how much phosphorus was present in the lake environment, but overall, most cases suggest there were large and rapid changes during the Devonian.

The fact that rising phosphorus levels in the ocean largely lines up with major extinction events during this time suggests the elevated nutrient played a role in the crisis.

Peaks of phosphorus exportation did not necessarily coincide in time or magnitude at each site studied, but the authors say that’s to be expected. The colonization of land by plants was not a “single punctuated event”, they explain, “but likely staggered geographically, peaking at different times in different parts of Euramerica and other parts of the Devonian Earth.”

The phosphorus on land depleted at varying rates depending on the location, leading to marine extinction events that lasted many millions of years. Although the precise processes behind the nutrient absorption, plant growth, and decay more than likely varied, an overall trend seems apparent. During drier periods, researchers found phosphorus delivery to lakes shot upwards, suggesting that tree roots might decay if not enough water is available, leading to the release of their nutrients.

Today, trees aren’t nearly as destructive for marine life as they were when they first arrived on the scene. Soil on land is now much deeper, allowing mineral-bound phosphorus to hide far beyond the reach of roots to leave organic molecules containing phosphorus to cycle more easily through the ecosystem.

That said, what is happening today shares worrisome patterns with what occurred hundreds of millions of years ago.

During the Devonian, atmospheric carbon dioxide and oxygen reached similar levels to those of recent years, but back then the changes were, in large part, due to the slow advance of plant life, as opposed to rapid changes through human activity.

Pollution from fertilizers and organic waste doesn’t require tree roots to make it out to sea. It is pumped there by us, and it’s triggering ‘dead zones’ of low oxygen in many important marine and lake environments.

“These new insights into the catastrophic results of natural events in the ancient world may serve as a warning about the consequences of similar conditions arising from human activity today,” says Fillipelli.

The study was published in GSA Bulletin.

Read original article here

Betelgeuse’s mysterious ‘Great Dimming’ may have been triggered by a wandering black hole

In late 2019, the star Betelgeuse dimmed by about 60%. While it’s impossible to say with certainty exactly what caused it, new research suggests that a wandering companion may have played a role. By swinging close to the giant star, the interloper may have raised a tidal bulge, causing the surface of Betelgeuse to dim. While this scenario can’t explain the full amount of dimming observed, it may have triggered other effects on the star that made the problem worse, researchers propose in a new paper.

Betelgeuse is one of the most easily recognizable stars in the sky. You can see it as the bright red shoulder of Orion and is usually the 10th brightest star in the sky. If you were to place the red supergiant in our solar system, it would engulf all of the inner rocky planets and stretch from the sun to the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter.

Betelgeuse is almost ready to die. It’s immense because it stopped fusing hydrogen in its core long ago and switched to fusing helium. Surrounding that core is a shell of burning hydrogen. With the intensity of fusion reactions in and around the core, the energies push the outer layers of the atmosphere outward, forcing the star to expand.

Related: Scientists still stuck on Betelgeuse antics a year after strange dimming episode

Red supergiants like Betelgeuse are among the largest stars in the universe by volume. They are also incredibly bright. With their sheer amount of surface area, they can pump out enormous quantities of light despite being relatively cool.

So naturally, astronomers were very surprised in late 2019, when Betelgeuse began to dim for no apparent reason. The dimming continued throughout early 2020, and at its lowest point, the absolute brightness of Betelgeuse dropped by about 60%. Just as randomly, the dimming halted in February 2020 and the star began to brighten again, and it has now reached its normal levels of intensity.

Astronomers have records of Betelgeuse going back half a century, and in those records, they could find no precedent for the 2019 event. So whatever caused the “Great Dimming,” as it came to be called, must have been truly extraordinary.

Gravity darkening 

Whatever caused the dimming also must have come from a situation outside the star itself, rather than being due to some fundamental change in Betelgeuse’s internal operations. That’s because changes to the fusion reactions don’t stop and start in only a few months. There’s simply too much mass in the core, and the energies released by fusion reactions are simply too high, to support those kinds of quick changes.

Astronomers have proposed many possibilities, including stellar outbursts or giants clumps of orbiting dust. One possibility is that the shape of Betelgeuse’s outer atmosphere changed, causing a shift in brightness. The brightness of a star’s atmosphere depends crucially on how far that outermost layer is from the nuclear core (and any surrounding shells) in the center. That’s because stars aren’t solid bodies but rather giant balls of gas. The stars hold themselves together with the weight of their own gravity, but that force is counterbalanced by the (literally) explosive energies released in their cores.

So a star’s surface is always balanced between these two forces. Where that balance point sits determines the star’s temperature, and its temperature determines its brightness.

Astronomers can see the effects of this when stars rotate too quickly. When they do, the rotational force bulges out their equators relative to their poles. That makes the equator of the star sit farther away from the core, which reduces the temperatures and, in turn, the brightness. This kind of “gravity darkening” makes some stars appear brighter at their poles than around their middles.

An unruly neighbor 

Betelgeuse isn’t rotating fast enough for this to be a source of the problem, but things other than rotation can raise bulges on the side of a star. If a random visitor, like a small black hole, swung too close to the star, it could raise tides on the surface exactly the same way the moon raises tides on Earth.

With the tidal bulge in place, the equator would dim, along with the overall appearance of the star. Once the visitor left, however, Betelgeuse could return to normal, with all parts of its atmosphere in the right places, and resume its usual copious radiation output. 

A team of astronomers investigated this scenario, and their work is published in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. After investigating a few options for the mass and velocity of an unknown, hidden visitor briefly swinging into the Betelgeuse system, the astronomers concluded that this scenario couldn’t account for the full 60% dimming. 

However, the passage of the visitor may have caused other effects, like a strong stellar outburst. Combined with the gravity darkening caused by tidal effects, a large amount of ejected material could have briefly obscured our view of Betelgeuse, with the total effect explaining the Great Dimming.

Astronomers may never fully understand what happened to Betelgeuse in late 2019. After all, it happened only once in all of our records of the famous star. Further observations, of both Betelgeuse and other red supergiants like it, may reveal an answer. While the combination of gravity darkening from a tidal bulge raised by a close encounter with a black hole and the ensuing eruption of shrouding material may seem far-fetched, with limited evidence, we can only concoct the best stories possible.

Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom or on Facebook.  



Read original article here

NIH probes whether Boston University COVID experiments should have triggered review

Boston University refutes report that lab created dangerous COVID strain


Boston University refutes report that lab created dangerous COVID strain

03:02

The National Institutes of Health is now examining whether experiments performed at Boston University should have triggered a federal review, the agency says, after scientists at the school tested strains they created of the COVID-19 virus combining the ancestral and Omicron variants.

Federal health authorities say they are looking into whether the scientists should have sought their permission before undertaking research that could lead to a “gain of function” in the virus gaining new or enhanced abilities, which can be “inherently risky.”

And locally, a spokesperson for the Boston Public Health Commission says it is now reviewing application materials from the study’s scientists “to confirm that the research was conducted in conformity with protocols, and that they were properly overseen.” 

The commission approved a proposed research protocol submitted by the scientists in March 2020, the spokesperson said.

However, Boston University says its research followed “all required regulatory obligations and protocols” to safely experiment with the viruses.

“Before anything is done in the [National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories], it goes through multiple layers of careful safety review and this is done through committees that are part of Boston University and also committees that are outside of, independent of, BU,” Robert Davey, a professor at Boston University’s National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories, said in a statement.

The scientists were studying what role the Omicron variant’s highly-mutated spike protein might play in its generally milder severity compared to previous waves. 

Mice were exposed to “chimeric recombinant” versions created by the scientists, which carried the Omicron variant’s spike protein combined with the “backbone” of the original strain. Similar kinds of recombinant variants have evolved in the wild.

Their findings were released Friday as a preprint that has yet to be peer-reviewed. The NIH’s scrutiny was first reported by Stat News.

Though NIH money was not directly sought for the experiments, the agency is probing whether it may have still been subject to their grants policy. 

The experiments may have also required clearance first by the federal government’s rules governing experiments that could lead to a “gain of function” in the virus, the NIH said. This kind of research is supposed to be vetted by a group of experts convened by the federal government before it can be funded.

However, Boston University says it “did not have an obligation to disclose this research” to the NIH.

While funding from the NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases was acknowledged by the scientists in their paper, Boston University said the grants were only for “tools and platforms” used by the scientists .

“NIAID funding was acknowledged because it was used to help develop the tools and platforms that were used in this research; they did not fund this research directly. NIH funding was also acknowledged for a shared instrumentation grant that helped support the pathology studies,” Rachel Lapal Cavallario, a spokesperson for the university, said in a statement.

News of the NIH’s probe follows coverage of the Boston University research first in the Daily Mail. The university had denounced the tabloid for sensationalizing their research, with “false and inaccurate” reporting that took their findings out of context.

For example, those early reports on the findings highlighted that 80% of infected mice died after scientists infected the animals with the recombinant strain, while none died after being exposed to the Omicron variant.

The university points out that the original variant led to 100% of the mice dying, meaning that their recombinant virus was made effectively “less dangerous.”

If there were any signs the viruses they created for their experiments were “gaining function,” the scientists would have “immediately” stopped and reported their research, Lapal Cavallario said.

The research was also conducted in the university’s “BSL-3” lab. That is the second-highest tier of precautions scientists can take when studying viruses, short of those taken for studying the most dangerous pathogens “for which no vaccine or therapy is available.”

“We take our safety and security of how we handle pathogens seriously, and the virus does not leave the laboratory in which it’s being studied,” Ronald Corley, director of Boston University’s NEIDL, said in a statement.

The study’s lead author, Mohsan Saeed, and other experts have cited other research that have performed similar kinds of experiments without controversy. 

One study co-authored by Food and Drug Administration researchers over the summer also generated “chimeric viruses” with the Omicron and ancestral strains to test on mice.

“In this case, we are interested in understanding viral genes or factors or mutations that attenuate SARS-CoV-2 so that we can use the knowledge to design live attenuated viral vaccines,” FDA spokesperson Abby Capobianco said in a statement.

The FDA’s internal research review committees approved the work, Capobianco said. The work was deemed not to be so-called “P3CO” research, which would have triggered a review before experiments that may “create, transfer, or use” enhanced potential pandemic pathogens (ePPP).

The Boston University preprint comes amid scrutiny of the federal government’s policies governing ePPP research, which are in the midst of a review by an NIH working group.

“It is concerning that this research – like the research in Wuhan that may have caused the pandemic – was not identified by the funding agency as possible ePPP research,” Rutgers University Professor Richard Ebright wrote on Twitter.

Ebright and others also disputed the university’s claim that the research was not a “gain of function” experiment.

“First, these are unquestionably gain-of-function experiments. As many have noted, this is a very broad term encompassing many harmless and some potentially dangerous experiments,” Marc Lipsitch, an epidemiologist at Harvard University and key official in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s forecasting arm, said Wednesday on Twitter.



Read original article here