Tag Archives: tiny

Kim Kardashian, 42, showcases VERY tiny waist with daughter North West, nine, at Fashion LA Awards – Daily Mail

  1. Kim Kardashian, 42, showcases VERY tiny waist with daughter North West, nine, at Fashion LA Awards Daily Mail
  2. Kim Kardashian, Gwyneth Paltrow & More Stars Attend Daily Front Row’s Fashion Los Angeles Awards Access Hollywood
  3. Gwyneth Paltrow, Brie Larson and Elle Fanning lead glam parade at Fashion Los Angeles Awards Daily Mail
  4. Meghann Fahy showcases her incredible figure at The Daily Front Row’s 7th Fashion Los Angeles Awards Daily Mail
  5. Keanu Reeves makes surprise appearance with Gwyneth Paltrow at The Daily Front Row Fashion LA Awards Daily Mail
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Merritt Wever on Why She Had to ‘Fortify’ Herself to Play Kathryn Hahn’s Mother in ‘Tiny Beautiful Things’ – Variety

  1. Merritt Wever on Why She Had to ‘Fortify’ Herself to Play Kathryn Hahn’s Mother in ‘Tiny Beautiful Things’ Variety
  2. ‘Tiny Beautiful Things’ Recap: Season 1, Episode 1 Premiere on Hulu TVLine
  3. Tiny Beautiful Things | A tearjerker that falls short Radio Times
  4. Stream It Or Skip It: ‘Tiny Beautiful Things’ On Hulu, Where Kathryn Hahn Is A Woman Who Becomes An Advice Columnist Despite Her Messy Life Decider
  5. Tiny Beautiful Things review – you’ll either weep or storm out of the room in fury The Guardian
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

This 51-year-old pays $725 a month to live in a ‘tiny home on wheels’ in someone’s backyard—take a look inside – CNBC

  1. This 51-year-old pays $725 a month to live in a ‘tiny home on wheels’ in someone’s backyard—take a look inside CNBC
  2. This Tiny House Costs a Fraction of a Traditional One and Comes With a Functional Kitchen autoevolution
  3. I ordered a tiny house from Home Depot – my pint-size pad costs me just $300 a month… The US Sun
  4. I live in a $725/month luxury tiny home on wheels near Boulder, Colorado – take a look inside CNBC
  5. Woman builds tiny homes in her backyard, helps unhoused families | People respond with generosity ABC10.com KXTV
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Kathryn Hahn on Relating to ‘Tiny Beautiful Things’ Character, Finally Being Picky in Her Career and Genres She Still Wants to Conquer – Variety

  1. Kathryn Hahn on Relating to ‘Tiny Beautiful Things’ Character, Finally Being Picky in Her Career and Genres She Still Wants to Conquer Variety
  2. ‘Tiny Beautiful Things’ Recap: Season 1, Episode 1 Premiere on Hulu TVLine
  3. Tiny Beautiful Things review – you’ll either weep or storm out of the room in fury The Guardian
  4. Tiny Beautiful Things | Life-to-Screen Featurette | Hulu Hulu
  5. ‘Tiny Beautiful Things’ Review: Kathryn Hahn in Hulu’s Moving Cheryl Strayed Adaptation Hollywood Reporter
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Rio Tinto apologises for loss of tiny radioactive capsule in Australian outback

MELBOURNE, Jan 30 (Reuters) – Rio Tinto Ltd (RIO.AX) apologised on Monday for the loss of a tiny radioactive capsule that has sparked a radiation alert across parts of the vast state of Western Australia.

The radioactive capsule, believed to have fallen from a truck, was part of a gauge used to measure the density of iron ore feed which had been entrusted to a specialist contractor to transport. The loss may have occurred up to two weeks ago.

Authorities are now grappling with the daunting task of searching along the truck’s 1,400 kilometre (870 mile) journey from north of Newman – a small town in the remote Kimberley region – to a storage facility in the northeast suburbs of Perth – a distance longer than the length of Great Britain.

The task, while akin to finding the proverbial needle in a haystack, is “not impossible” as searchers are equipped with radiation detectors, said Andrew Stuchbery who runs the department of Nuclear Physics & Accelerator Applications at the Australian National University.

“That’s like if you dangled a magnet over a haystack, it’s going to give you more of a chance,” he said.

“If the source just happened to be lying in the middle of the road you might get lucky…It’s quite radioactive so if you get close to it, it will stick out,” he said.

The gauge was picked up from Rio’s Gudai-Darri mine site on Jan. 12. When it was unpacked for inspection on Jan. 25, the gauge was found broken apart, with one of four mounting bolts missing and screws from the gauge also gone.

Authorities suspect vibrations from the truck caused the screws and the bolt to come loose, and the radioactive capsule from the gauge fell out of the package and then out of a gap in the truck.

“We are taking this incident very seriously. We recognise this is clearly very concerning and are sorry for the alarm it has caused in the Western Australian community,” Simon Trott, Rio’s iron ore division chief, said in a statement.

The silver capsule, 6 millimetres (mm) in diameter and 8 mm long, contains Caesium-137 which emits radiation equal to 10 X-rays per hour.

Authorities have recommended people stay at least five metres (16.5 feet) away as exposure could cause radiation burns or radiation sickness, though they add that the risk to the general community is relatively low.

“From what I have read, if you drive past it, the risk is equivalent to an X-ray. But if you stand next to it or you handle it, it could be very dangerous,” said Stuchbery.

The state’s emergency services department has established a hazard management team and has brought in specialised equipment that includes portable radiation survey meters to detect radiation levels across a 20-metre radius and which can be used from moving vehicles.

Trott said Rio had engaged a third-party contractor, with appropriate expertise and certification, to safely package and transport the gauge.

“We have completed radiological surveys of all areas on site where the device had been, and surveyed roads within the mine site as well as the access road leading away from the Gudai-Darri mine site,” he said, adding that Rio was also conducting its own investigation into how the loss occurred.

Analysts said that the transport of dangerous goods to and from mine sites was routine, adding that such incidents have been extremely rare and did not reflect poor safety standards on Rio’s part.

The incident is another headache for the mining giant following its 2020 destruction of two ancient and sacred rock shelters in the Pilbara region of Western Australia for an iron ore mine.

Reporting by Melanie Burton; Editing by Edwina Gibbs

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Shooting Tiny, High Speed Bullets at a Spacecraft Could Speed Up Travel to The Stars : ScienceAlert

Today, multiple space agencies are investigating cutting-edge propulsion ideas that will allow for rapid transits to other bodies in the Solar System.

These include NASA’s Nuclear-Thermal or Nuclear-Electric Propulsion (NTP/NEP) concepts that could enable transit times to Mars in 100 days (or even 45) and a nuclear-powered Chinese spacecraft that could explore Neptune and its largest moon, Triton.

While these and other ideas could allow for interplanetary exploration, getting beyond the Solar System presents some major challenges.

As we explored in a previous article, it would take spacecraft using conventional propulsion anywhere from 19,000 to 81,000 years to reach even the nearest star, Proxima Centauri (4.25 light-years from Earth). To this end, engineers have been researching proposals for uncrewed spacecraft that rely on beams of directed energy (lasers) to accelerate light sails to a fraction of the speed of light.

A new idea proposed by researchers from UCLA envisions a twist on the beam-sail idea: a pellet-beam concept that could accelerate a 1-ton spacecraft to the edge of the Solar System in less than 20 years.

The concept, titled “Pellet-Beam Propulsion for Breakthrough Space Exploration,” was proposed by Artur Davoyan, an Assistant Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA).

The proposal was one of fourteen proposals chosen by the NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) program as part of their 2023 selections, which awarded a total of US$175,000 in grants to develop the technologies further. Davoyan’s proposal builds on recent work with directed-energy propulsion (DEP) and light sail technology to realize a Solar Gravitational Lens.

As Prof. Davoyan told Universe Today via email, the problem with spacecraft is that they are still beholden to the Rocket Equation:

“All current spacecraft and rockets fly by expanding fuel. The faster the fuel is thrown away, the more efficient is the rocket. However, there is a limited amount of fuel that we can carry on board. As a result, the velocity a spacecraft can be accelerated to is limited. This fundamental limit is dictated by the Rocket Equation. The limitations of Rocket Equation translate into a relatively slow and costly space exploration. Such missions as Solar Gravitational Lens are not feasible with current spacecraft.”

The Solar Gravitational Lens (SGL) is a revolutionary proposal that would be the most powerful telescope ever conceived. Examples include the Solar Gravity Lens, which was selected in 2020 for NIAC Phase III development.

The concept relies on a phenomenon predicted by Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity known as Gravitational Lensing, where massive objects alter the curvature of spacetime, amplifying the light from objects in the background. This technique allows astronomers to study distant objects with greater resolution and precision.

By positioning a spacecraft at the heliopause (~500 AU from the Sun), astronomers could study exoplanets and distant objects with the resolution of a primary mirror measuring around 100 km (62 miles) in diameter. The challenge is developing a propulsion system that could get the spacecraft to this distance in a reasonable amount of time.

To date, the only spacecraft to reach interstellar space have been the Voyager 1 and 2 probes, which launched in 1977 and are currently about 159 and 132 AUs from the Sun (respectively).

When it left the Solar System, the Voyager 1 probe was traveling at a record-breaking velocity of about 17 km/s (38,028 mph), or 3.6 AU a year. Nevertheless, this probe still took 35 years to reach the boundary between the Sun’s solar wind and the interstellar medium (the heliopause).

At its current speed, it will take over 40,000 years for Voyager 1 to fly past another star system – AC+79 3888, an obscure star in the constellation Ursa Minor. For this reason, scientists are investigating directed energy (DE) propulsion to accelerate light sails, which could reach another star system in a matter of decades.

As Prof. Davoyan explained, this method offers some distinct advantages but also has its share of drawbacks:

“Laser sailing, unlike conventional spacecraft and rockets, does not require fuel on board to accelerate. Here acceleration comes from a laser pushing the spacecraft by radiation pressure. In principle, near-speed-of-light velocities can be reached with this method. However, laser beams diverge at long distances, meaning that there is only a limited distance range over which a spacecraft can be accelerated. This limitation of laser sailing leads to a need of having exorbitantly high laser powers, gigawatts, and in some proposals, terawatts, or puts a constraint on spacecraft mass.”

Examples of the laser-beam concept include Project Dragonfly, a feasibility study by the Institute for Interstellar Studies (i4is) for a mission that could reach a nearby star system within a century.

Then there’s Breakthrough Starshot, which proposes a 100-gigawatt (Gw) laser array that would accelerate gram-scale nanocraft (Starchip).

At a maximum velocity of 161 million km (100 million miles) or 20 percent of the speed of light, Starshot will be able to reach Alpha Centauri in about 20 years. Inspired by these concepts, Prof. Davoyan and his colleagues propose a novel twist on the idea: a pellet-beam concept.

This mission concept could serve as a fast-transit interstellar precursor mission, like Starshot and Dragonfly.

But for their purposes, Davoyan and his team examined a pellet-beam system that would propel a ~900 kg (1 U.S. ton) payload to a distance of 500 AU in less than 20 years. Said Davoyan:

“In our case, the beam pushing the spacecraft is made of tiny pellets, hence [we call it] the pellet beam. Each pellet is accelerated to very high velocities by laser ablation, and then the pellets carry their momentum to push the spacecraft.

Unlike a laser beam, pellets do not diverge as quickly, allowing us to accelerate a heavier spacecraft. The pellets, being much heavier than photons, carry more momentum and can transfer a higher force to a spacecraft.”

In addition, the small size and low mass of the pellets mean that they can be propelled by relatively low-power laser beams. Overall, Davoyan and his colleagues estimate that a 1-ton spacecraft could be accelerated to velocities of up to ~30 AU a year using a 10-megawatt (Mw) laser beam.

For the Phase I effort, they will demonstrate the feasibility of the pellet-beam concept through detailed modeling of the different subsystems and proof-of-concept experiments. They will also explore the utility of the pellet-beam system for interstellar missions that could explore neighboring stars in our lifetimes.

“The pellet beam aims to transform the way deep space is explored by enabling fast transit missions to far-away destinations,” said Davoyan. “With the pellet beam, outer planets can be reached in less than a year, 100 AU in about three years, and solar gravity lens at 500 AU in about 15 years. Importantly, unlike other concepts, the pellet-beam can propel heavy spacecraft (~1 ton), which substantially increases the scope of possible missions.”

If realized, an SGL spacecraft would allow astronomers to directly image neighboring exoplanets (like Proxima b) with multi pixel resolution and obtain spectra from their atmospheres. These observations would offer direct evidence of atmospheres, biosignatures, and possibly even technosignatures.

In this way, the same technology that lets astronomers directly image exoplanets and study them in extensive detail would also enable interstellar missions to explore them directly.

This article was originally published by Universe Today. Read the original article.

Read original article here

NASA’s Lunar Gateway space station will be so tiny that astronauts won’t be able to stand

Orbiting at 250 miles above the Earth, the International Space Station (ISS) has been integral to a bucket load of research over the past 25 years.

Surrounded by a dizzying number of controls and experiments, occupants get some shut eye in sleeping bags attached to walls that couldn’t be further from luxury if you tried.

But compared to the upcoming Lunar Gateway space station, which will orbit the moon when it is built later this decade, the ISS is decidedly roomy.

That is according to one of the architects behind the design of Gateway, who said the living quarters will be so small that astronauts won’t be able to stand upright inside them.

Cramped: One of the architects behind the design of the new Lunar Gateway space station says the living quarters will be so small that astronauts won’t be able to stand upright inside them. René Waclavicek said they would total about 280 cubic feet (8 cubic metres), making it smaller than not only the International Space Station but even the average UK living room

LUNAR GATEWAY: THE KEY FACTS

Mass: 40 tonnes

Orbit: Near rectilinear halo

Modules:

– Power and Propulsion Element

– Communications module and connecting module (ESPRIT)

– Science and airlock module 

– Habitat with robotic arm

– Logistics module

<!- - ad: https://mads.dailymail.co.uk/v8/de/sciencetech/none/article/other/mpu_factbox.html?id=mpu_factbox_1 - ->

Advertisement

René Waclavicek, a space architect and design researcher at Austria-based LIQUIFER Space Systems, said the Lunar Gateway living quarters would total about 280 cubic feet (8 cubic metres), making it smaller than not only the ISS but even the average UK living room.

When Gateway is finished it will be about one sixth of the size of the ISS and feature two habitation modules that will force crew members to exist in very close proximity to each other. 

The space lab’s quarters will be 6ft wide, 6ft long and 6ft high, compared to a 7.2 x 7.2ft interior on the ISS that even allows astronauts to perform space gymnastics routines.

The average UK living room is around 55 cubic feet (17 metres), or 7.5 x 7.5ft.

‘The International Habitation module will have habitable space of about 8 cubic meters [280 cubic feet] and you will have to share it with three others,’ Waclavicek said at the Czech Space Week conference in Brno last November. 

‘In other words, that would be a room 2 by 2 by 2 meters [6.6 by 6.6 by 6.6 feet]. And you are locked in there. 

‘There are other rooms but they are not bigger and there are not many of them.’

When Gateway is finished it will be about one sixth of the size of the ISS and feature two habitation modules that will force crew members to exist in very close proximity to each other 

Who is involved: How Gateway will look and the space organisations involved in building it

That is according to one of the architects behind the design of Gateway, who said the living quarters will be so small that astronauts won’t be able to stand upright inside them 

NASA has said the orbiting laboratory will provide astronauts with a ‘home away from home’ during trips to the moon, and a staging post for lunar landings

WHAT IS THE LUNAR GATEWAY? 

The NASA-led Lunar Gateway is part of a long-term project to send humans to Mars.

The crew-tended spaceport will orbit the moon and serve as a ‘gateway to deep space and the lunar surface,’ the US space agency has said.

The first modules of the station could be completed as soon as 2024.

An international base for lunar exploration for humans and robots and a stopover for spacecraft is a leading contender to succeed the $100 billion International Space Station (ISS), the world’s largest space project to date.

<!- - ad: https://mads.dailymail.co.uk/v8/de/sciencetech/none/article/other/mpu_factbox.html?id=mpu_factbox_2 - ->

Advertisement

NASA has said the orbiting laboratory will provide astronauts with a ‘home away from home’ during trips to the moon, and a staging post for lunar landings.

The lab will have a four person capacity and will see the US space agency work with some existing ISS partners including Europe, Japan and Canada.

Waclavicek has been involved in the design phase of the European-built International Habitation module, or I-Hab.

It is made up of bedrooms and lab space and is one of Gateway’s two habitable areas, along with the Habitation and Logistics Outpost, or HALO, being developed by US company Northrop Grumman.

Waclavicek said designers initially wanted to make larger modules than the ones on the ISS, with more living space associated with them, but this vision had to be scrapped because it was deemed impossible to launch something as big to the moon.

‘We started off in the first phase with a cylinder with outer dimensions similar to what we know from the ISS,’ Waclavicek said.

‘That’s about 4.5 m [15 feet] in diameter and 6 m [20 feet] long. But due to mass restrictions, we had to shrink it down to 3 m [10 feet] in outer dimensions. 

‘And that left us with an interior cross section of only 1.2 m by 1.2 m [4 feet by 4 feet]. 

‘Most of the internal volume is consumed by machinery, so it’s essentially just a corridor, where you have to turn 90 degrees if you want to stretch out.’

He added: ‘[The I-Hab] really is just a cylinder with a hatch on each end and two hatches at the sides and a corridor going through the length axis. 

‘Even if you want to pass one another, it’s already quite difficult, you have to interrupt whatever you are doing in the moment to let the other fellow pass by you.’

Waclavicek has been involved in the design phase of the European-built International Habitation module, or I-Hab

The space lab’s quarters will be 6ft wide, 6ft long and 6ft high, compared to 7.2 x 7.2ft on the ISS 

 ‘The International Habitation module will have habitable space of about 8 cubic meters [280 cubic feet] and you will have to share it with three others,’ space architect René Waclavicek said

Lunar Gateway forms a core part of the Artemis missions, the first of which was successfully completed at the end of last year.

It is hoped that Artemis III, scheduled to launch in 2025, will see NASA put the first woman and next man on the moon.

The US space agency wants to use its massive Space Launch System rocket to blast four astronauts into orbit onboard an Orion crew capsule, which will then dock with Gateway if it is ready.

A separate craft based on Elon Musk’s Starship design, docked with the Gateway, will be there waiting to receive two crew members for the final leg of the journey to the surface of the moon.

The astronauts would spend a week on the moon before boarding Starship to return to lunar orbit, then take Orion back to Earth. 

Musk’s company SpaceX is also due to launch the foundational elements of the Gateway to lunar orbit, including the Power and Propulsion Element (PPE) and the HALO.

Plans: When Gateway is finished it will be about one sixth of the size of the ISS and feature two habitation modules that will force crew members to exist in very close proximity to each other

Although Gateway won’t have a massive viewing window like on the ISS, it will have smaller ones in the fuelling module ESPIRIT.

The reason it can’t have a big one is again because of the technical issues associated with it — ‘glass is very heavy so a window is the first thing that gets canceled’, Waclawicek said.

The team has now begun building a real-size mockup for testing human interaction with the habitat environment.

I-Hab’s journey to the moon is not expected before 2027, although the American HALO module could be launched as early as 2024.

If you enjoyed this article…

Sticking on the extraterrestrial theme, are ‘alien bugs’ living on Mars? 

And do you speak extraterrestrial? Scientists say Earth needs to prepare for an alien encounter now before it’s too late

Or check out these weird and wonder new exoplanets discovered in 2022, including water worlds, a gas giant ‘in the womb’ and a marshmallow-like marble

EXPLAINED: THE $100 BILLION INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION SITS 250 MILES ABOVE THE EARTH

The International Space Station (ISS) is a $100 billion (£80 billion) science and engineering laboratory that orbits 250 miles (400 km) above Earth.

It has been permanently staffed by rotating crews of astronauts and cosmonauts since November 2000. 

Crews have come mainly from the US and Russia, but the Japanese space agency JAXA and European space agency ESA have also sent astronauts. 

The International Space Station has been continuously occupied for more than 20 years and has been expended with multiple new modules added and upgrades to systems 

Research conducted aboard the ISS often requires one or more of the unusual conditions present in low Earth orbit, such as low-gravity or oxygen.

ISS studies have investigated human research, space medicine, life sciences, physical sciences, astronomy and meteorology.

The US space agency, NASA, spends about $3 billion (£2.4 billion) a year on the space station program, with the remaining funding coming from international partners, including Europe, Russia and Japan.

So far 244 individuals from 19 countries have visited the station, and among them eight private citizens who spent up to $50 million for their visit.

There is an ongoing debate about the future of the station beyond 2025, when it is thought some of the original structure will reach ‘end of life’.

Russia, a major partner in the station, plans to launch its own orbital platform around then, with Axiom Space, a private firm, planning to send its own modules for purely commercial use to the station at the same time. 

NASA, ESA, JAXA and the Canadian Space Agency (CSA) are working together to build a space station in orbit around the moon, and Russia and China are working on a similar project, that would also include a base on the surface. 

Read original article here

Upcoming Lunar Space Station to Feature Tiny Living Quarters

An illustration of the lunar gateway in orbit around the Moon.
Illustration: NASA

Architects designing the living space for the upcoming lunar Gateway did their best to make it comfortable for astronauts, but technical constraints forced them to create a tiny, noisy corridor with no windows and barely enough room to stand upright.

The European-built international habitat, or I-Hab, is meant to provide living quarters for astronauts on board the Lunar Gateway, a future outpost that will orbit the Moon. The purpose of Gateway, a collaboration between NASA, the European Space Agency, and other international partners, is to provide a place for astronauts to conduct science in lunar orbit and to transfer from one spacecraft to another, such as a lunar lander. But an architect involved in I-Hab’s design recently revealed the claustrophobic conditions for the orbital habitat that’s supposed to house up to four astronauts for around 90 days at a time.

Related story: What to Know About Lunar Gateway, NASA’s Future Moon-Orbiting Space Station

During the Czech Space Week conference in Brno, Czechia (the country formerly known as the Czech Republic), René Waclavicek, a space architect and design researcher at Austria-based LIQUIFER Space Systems, stated that the Lunar Gateway will be roughly one-sixth of the size of the International Space Station (ISS), Space.com reported. Waclavicek, who was involved in I-Hab’s design, said that the architects behind the lunar living quarters were constrained by the amount of material that can be transported to the Moon, requiring them to make some sacrifices.

I-Habwill have habitable space of about 8 cubic meters [280 cubic feet] and you will have to share it with three others,” Waclavicek said during the conference. “In other words, that would be a room 2 by 2 by 2 meters [6.6 by 6.6 by 6.6 feet], and you are locked in there.”

By comparison, the ISS stretches for about 357 feet (108 meters) from end-to-end, and is essentially a five-bedroom orbital complex complete with a gym, two bathrooms, and a 360-degree window with an enviable view of our home planet.

A view of the Moon wouldn’t be bad either, except I-Hab won’t be equipped with the same luxury. “We always get asked ‘where is the window?’,” Waclavicek said. “The moon is a thousand times farther away [than the ISS] and each window is a disturbance in the continuity of the structure. Also, glass is very heavy so a window is the first thing that gets canceled.” The Gateway will have windows, although not in the living quarters. Instead, the refueling module ESPRIT will have small windows, according to Waclavicek.

With an extremely curtailed view of the surrounding cosmos, the astronauts will have a hard time relaxing during their downtime—especially as they’re being serenaded by the robotic hum of onboard machinery. “Actually, you are living in a machine room,” Waclavicek said. “The life-support systems make noise, they have a lot of fans, and you have [a tiny amount] of private space where you can close the door and tame the noise.”

The architect admits that they began with a design for larger living quarters but had to shrink it down due to mass restrictions for the lunar outpost. As a result, astronauts will be cramped inside a tiny tube for the duration of their mission around the Moon. “[The I-Hab] really is just a cylinder with a hatch on each end and two hatches at the sides and a corridor going through the length axis,” he said. “Even if you want to pass one another, it’s already quite difficult, you have to interrupt whatever you are doing in the moment to let the other [person] pass by you.” It will be a cramped environment, no doubt, but it’s important to remember that a capsule, namely NASA’s Orion spacecraft, will be attached to the Gateway station during these missions, which will allow for some added elbow room. Lunar landers, such as SpaceX’s upcoming Starship, will also dock to Gateway.

NASA’s Artemis program is officially underway, having kicking off in November 2022 with the launch of Artemis 1. Unlike Apollo, Artemis is designed to establish a sustainable presence of astronauts on and around the Moon, with the Lunar Gateway being an essential part of the mission objective.

The first components of the Lunar Gateway could reach orbit as early as 2024, but I-Hab isn’t expected to make it up there until 2027. The living quarters may not sound like it would provide for a pleasant experience on board, but it will likely contribute some valuable science on Earth’s natural satellite and beyond.

More: Texas Company Wins $57 Million From NASA to Develop Lunar Construction Tech

Read original article here

Why You Should Never Pop Those Tiny, Hard Bumps on Your Face

How to Get Rid of Milia SafelyMykola Sosiukin / EyeEm – Getty Images

You look in the mirror and there they are: a bunch of tiny, hard white spots on your face, possibly with a faint blue tint. They don’t look or feel like a typical zit or whitehead, so what could they be? Most likely, they’re something called milia, or tiny pockets of dead skin.

“Milia are made of keratin,” says Farah Moustafa, MD, dermatologist and director of laser and cosmetics at Tufts Medical Center in Boston. They commonly develop on the cheeks, eyelids and the nose. As your skin naturally exfoliates old cells so that new ones can develop, the cells can get trapped, harden and become cystic — that’s milia. “Think of them as pimples with nowhere to go,” says Joshua Zeichner, MD, a dermatologist and the director of Cosmetic and Clinical Research in Dermatology at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City.

These benign cysts — sometimes called “milk spots”— are very common in infants; about 50% of babies have them at birth, according to the Cleveland Clinic. But they can show up on anyone at any age.

What causes milia in adults?

According to Dermatology Advisor, there are different types of milia, including neonatal milia, the type that shows up on infants’ skin. The most common type in adults is primary milia; there are two other types that are less common, one that occurs in clusters on your skin and another that’s caused by trauma to the skin.

Besides the process of skin cells being trapped during the natural process of exfoliation, milia can also occur because of other factors. “They may be due to sun damage or from heavy skin care products,” Dr. Zeichner says. Oil-based makeup or cleansers can be a culprit, if they clog your pores.

Skin damage from an injury or a rash, or prolonged use of corticosteroids, can also be a possible cause. Additionally, certain medical conditions can cause milia to form. “Milia can be a secondary symptom of a blistering skin condition, like a burn,” explains Dr. Moustafa. “They can also happen because of an autoimmune disease or genetic condition.” You can also get milia if you don’t cleanse your skin regularly, and you may be more prone to develop them if you have rosacea or dandruff.

The first thing you may wonder is whether you should see a doctor if you have milia. Most often, there’s no need to. “Milia are completely harmless and are strictly a cosmetic issue,” says Dr. Zeichner.

Often times, they’ll simply go away on their own. But if yours are sticking around, and they bug you, don’t try any of the “milia removers” you see online – they’re completely ineffective, experts say.

How to get rid of and prevent milia:

Don’t try to remove them yourself.

It’s never a good idea to try a pop milia like a pimple (you also shouldn’t be popping your pimples either!). “Never poke or prod milia,” advises Dr. Moustafa. “And avoid scrubbing milia with any kind of gritty exfoliant.”

Focus on gentle cleansing.

Here’s the best daily remedy to try: “Gentle skin care,” says Dr. Moustafa. Wash your face the right way, following advice from the American Academy of Dermatology: Using a gentle cleanser and your fingertips, wash with lukewarm water, avoiding scrubbing and rinse with lukewarm water and pat dry with a soft towel. Also, make sure your skin has a chance to breathe and be free of makeup every once in a while.

Try topical retinoid cream.

If you have a predisposition to milia, your dermatologist may recommend you try a topical retinoid if you have a recurrence. “This can help by removing cells in the outer skin layer, encouraging eventual release of the milia from your skin,” says Dr. Zeichner.

Always wear sunscreen.

This is a golden rule even if you don’t have milia, but sun burn and damage can be common contributors. Be sure to properly apply at least an SPF 30 sunscreen to your skin 30 minutes before heading outside. Birnur K. Aral, Ph.D., the Good Housekeeping Institute’s Beauty, Health & Sustainability Lab executive director, suggests applying a nickel-size dollop to your face. For sprays, she suggests spraying the sunscreen all over skin, then rubbing it in.

Visit dermatologist for professional removal.

To actually remove milia, you need to have them extracted from your skin. “This means when a dermatologist physically creates an opening with a needle or a scalpel blade,” says Dr. Zeichner. Never do this yourself. Trying to remove milia the wrong way can lead to infections or scars.” And he adds, “Milia around the eyes are particularly difficult to address, because of their proximity to your eyeball.”

The actual process of removing milia is called de-roofing. A dermatologist uses a needle to remove the flap that’s trapping the keratin in your skin and pluck out the keratin itself. The procedure isn’t covered by insurance, though, and can be a bit pricey, ranging from $200-$500 on average.

You Might Also Like

Read original article here

Why You Should Never Pop Those Tiny, Hard Bumps on Your Face

How to Get Rid of Milia SafelyMykola Sosiukin / EyeEm – Getty Images

You look in the mirror and there they are: a bunch of tiny, hard white spots on your face, possibly with a faint blue tint. They don’t look or feel like a typical zit or whitehead, so what could they be? Most likely, they’re something called milia, or tiny pockets of dead skin.

“Milia are made of keratin,” says Farah Moustafa, MD, dermatologist and director of laser and cosmetics at Tufts Medical Center in Boston. They commonly develop on the cheeks, eyelids and the nose. As your skin naturally exfoliates old cells so that new ones can develop, the cells can get trapped, harden and become cystic — that’s milia. “Think of them as pimples with nowhere to go,” says Joshua Zeichner, MD, a dermatologist and the director of Cosmetic and Clinical Research in Dermatology at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City.

These benign cysts — sometimes called “milk spots”— are very common in infants; about 50% of babies have them at birth, according to the Cleveland Clinic. But they can show up on anyone at any age.

What causes milia in adults?

According to Dermatology Advisor, there are different types of milia, including neonatal milia, the type that shows up on infants’ skin. The most common type in adults is primary milia; there are two other types that are less common, one that occurs in clusters on your skin and another that’s caused by trauma to the skin.

Besides the process of skin cells being trapped during the natural process of exfoliation, milia can also occur because of other factors. “They may be due to sun damage or from heavy skin care products,” Dr. Zeichner says. Oil-based makeup or cleansers can be a culprit, if they clog your pores.

Skin damage from an injury or a rash, or prolonged use of corticosteroids, can also be a possible cause. Additionally, certain medical conditions can cause milia to form. “Milia can be a secondary symptom of a blistering skin condition, like a burn,” explains Dr. Moustafa. “They can also happen because of an autoimmune disease or genetic condition.” You can also get milia if you don’t cleanse your skin regularly, and you may be more prone to develop them if you have rosacea or dandruff.

The first thing you may wonder is whether you should see a doctor if you have milia. Most often, there’s no need to. “Milia are completely harmless and are strictly a cosmetic issue,” says Dr. Zeichner.

Often times, they’ll simply go away on their own. But if yours are sticking around, and they bug you, don’t try any of the “milia removers” you see online – they’re completely ineffective, experts say.

How to get rid of and prevent milia:

Don’t try to remove them yourself.

It’s never a good idea to try a pop milia like a pimple (you also shouldn’t be popping your pimples either!). “Never poke or prod milia,” advises Dr. Moustafa. “And avoid scrubbing milia with any kind of gritty exfoliant.”

Focus on gentle cleansing.

Here’s the best daily remedy to try: “Gentle skin care,” says Dr. Moustafa. Wash your face the right way, following advice from the American Academy of Dermatology: Using a gentle cleanser and your fingertips, wash with lukewarm water, avoiding scrubbing and rinse with lukewarm water and pat dry with a soft towel. Also, make sure your skin has a chance to breathe and be free of makeup every once in a while.

Try topical retinoid cream.

If you have a predisposition to milia, your dermatologist may recommend you try a topical retinoid if you have a recurrence. “This can help by removing cells in the outer skin layer, encouraging eventual release of the milia from your skin,” says Dr. Zeichner.

Always wear sunscreen.

This is a golden rule even if you don’t have milia, but sun burn and damage can be common contributors. Be sure to properly apply at least an SPF 30 sunscreen to your skin 30 minutes before heading outside. Birnur K. Aral, Ph.D., the Good Housekeeping Institute’s Beauty, Health & Sustainability Lab executive director, suggests applying a nickel-size dollop to your face. For sprays, she suggests spraying the sunscreen all over skin, then rubbing it in.

Visit dermatologist for professional removal.

To actually remove milia, you need to have them extracted from your skin. “This means when a dermatologist physically creates an opening with a needle or a scalpel blade,” says Dr. Zeichner. Never do this yourself. Trying to remove milia the wrong way can lead to infections or scars.” And he adds, “Milia around the eyes are particularly difficult to address, because of their proximity to your eyeball.”

The actual process of removing milia is called de-roofing. A dermatologist uses a needle to remove the flap that’s trapping the keratin in your skin and pluck out the keratin itself. The procedure isn’t covered by insurance, though, and can be a bit pricey, ranging from $200-$500 on average.

You Might Also Like

Read original article here