Tag Archives: sued

3 Texas women sued for wrongful death after man alleges they helped his ex-wife obtain medication for an abortion – CBS News

  1. 3 Texas women sued for wrongful death after man alleges they helped his ex-wife obtain medication for an abortion CBS News
  2. Three Texas women are sued for wrongful death after allegedly helping friend obtain abortion medication The Texas Tribune
  3. Texas man sues women he says helped his ex-wife obtain abortion pills The Washington Post
  4. Woman nearly died because Texas abortion banned treatment: lawsuit Insider
  5. “Barbaric Restrictions”: 5 Women Sue Texas After Being Denied Abortions Despite Deadly Health Risks Democracy Now!
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Lucasfilm Sued For “Egregious” Axing Of Producer Karyn McCarthy From ‘Star Wars’ Series ‘The Acolyte’ – Deadline

  1. Lucasfilm Sued For “Egregious” Axing Of Producer Karyn McCarthy From ‘Star Wars’ Series ‘The Acolyte’ Deadline
  2. Lucasfilm Sued for ‘Egregious’ Firing of Producer on ‘Star Wars’ Series ‘The Acolyte’ Variety
  3. Lucasfilm Sued For “Egregious” Axing Of Producer Karyn McCarthy From ‘Star Wars’ Series ‘The Acolyte’ Yahoo Entertainment
  4. Lucasfilm Sued by Former Producer on ‘Star Wars’ Series ‘The Acolyte’ for Breach of Contract IndieWire
  5. Lucasfilm Faces Lawsuit for Star Wars Disney+ Firing (Report) The Direct
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Marilyn Manson Sued for Sexual Assault of a Minor – Rolling Stone

Marilyn Manson allegedly groomed and sexually assaulted an underage girl multiple times in the 1990s, according to a new lawsuit. This is the first suit to focus on sex crimes that allegedly took place in the beginning of Manson’s career, while those who have previously sued the singer all accused him of sexual misconduct around 2010.

Manson, whose real name is Brian Warner, is listed as a defendant alongside his former labels Interscope and Nothing Records. The plaintiff, now an adult, has submitted the suit anonymously as “Jane Doe.” The filing includes counts of sexual battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress against Warner, and negligence and intentional infliction of emotional distress, among other charges, against the labels. The case was filed in Nassau County Supreme Court on Long Island, New York.

In the lawsuit, Doe says she first encountered Warner in 1995 after a Dallas concert when she was age 16. She had waited outside his tour bus with a group of people to meet him, and he allegedly invited her “and one of the other younger girls” onto his bus where he asked their age and school grade and took down their home addresses and phone numbers. 

“While on the tour bus, Defendant Warner performed various acts of criminal sexual conduct upon Plaintiff, who was a virgin at the time, including but not limited to forced copulation and vaginal penetration,” the lawsuit claims. The age of consent in Texas at the time was, and still is, 17. “One of the band members watched Defendant Warner sexually assault Plaintiff,” the suit says. “Plaintiff was in pain, scared, upset, humiliated and confused. After he was done, Defendant Warner laughed at her. … Then Defendant Warner demanded Plaintiff to ‘get the fuck off of my bus’ and threatened Plaintiff that, if she told anyone, he would kill her and her family.”

Doe alleges that a crew member gave her a 1-800 number for the band and a password so she and Warner could meet again. She began using drugs and alcohol shortly after the alleged sexual assault, the suit says, and would continue to abuse substances in subsequent years. Doe claims in the suit that Warner would call her and chat with her online asking for explicit photos of her and her friends.

Before the year was up, Warner allegedly convinced Doe, who was still 16, to travel to a New Orleans concert where she met with Warner, who, the suit says, “groomed” her by complimenting her artwork. “Defendant Warner then became more aggressive and again sexually assaulted Plaintiff, including kissing, biting her breast, oral copulation, and penetration,” the complaint says. “After the second assault, Defendant Warner acted in a kinder manner nicer to Plaintiff and told her that he wanted to see her again.” (The age of consent in Louisiana at the time was, and still is, 17.)

Doe continued her contact with Warner and his band. At age 18, she started dating then-Nine Inch Nails drummer Chris Vrenna, who allegedly urged her to move to Los Angeles. While there, she attended a Marilyn Manson concert where a band member encouraged her to attend a 1999 Dallas concert. She also went to the next show, in New Orleans, where a crew member helped her get backstage for an audience with Warner. A member of Warner’s retinue allegedly told her he would continue to give her backstage passes. “The atmosphere backstage always included the availability of large amounts of drugs for her and others to use,” according to the suit. She claims she spent the next four weeks on the road with the group, taking drugs and spending hours with Warner in which he’d “groom, harass, and sexually abuse” her.

During this period, the suit alleges that Warner began tightening his psychological control over Doe, as she continued to accompany him on tour dates. “While she was still a child, Defendant Warner had purposefully and intentionally laid the groundwork necessary to intimidate and control her,” it says. “Despite reaching the legal age of majority, that power to psychologically intimidate and control Plaintiff was still present. … While in Florida, Plaintiff considered going back home. Plaintiff spoke with Defendant Warner and revealed her vulnerabilities and a general lack of support she felt from her family. As he did on countless occasions, Defendant Warner exploited this vulnerability to keep Plaintiff under his control. Defendant Warner often made Plaintiff feel alone and isolated by telling her that no one understands her other than him, which included her family. At the time, Plaintiff believed Defendant Warner and was compelled to keep following him.”

He continued this pattern throughout the time they spent together, Doe alleges, claiming that when she was 19, Warner “perpetuated his grooming, manipulation, exploitation and sexual assault of Plaintiff” over the course of approximately a month.

“Throughout the tour and while within the State of New York, when Plaintiff was with Defendant Warner both on concert days and on off days, Defendant Warner coerced her to have sex with him,” the suit claims. “Defendant Warner often coerced Plaintiff to have sex with him and other band members or his assistant at the same time. Defendant Warner controlled what Plaintiff could do, who could touch Plaintiff, and who he wanted Plaintiff to be with sexually, all while providing Plaintiff with drugs.”

Among other charges, Doe is suing for intentional infliction of emotional distress, claiming that Warner’s “emotional manipulation” included “hostile and verbally abusive behavior.” “At times, he began ridiculing Plaintiff, especially in the presence of other young female fans,” the suit says. “Defendant Warner openly called her racial slurs and called her fat. At other times, Defendant Warner told Plaintiff she was beautiful and confided in her some of his most personal secrets. Plaintiff saw Defendant Warner almost every day (except when his fiancée was in town), before, during, and after his shows.”

On one date of the 1999 tour, Doe refused to accompany Warner in his room, according to the filing, because she was afraid of how Warner “had been sexually violent with Plaintiff in the past” and claims he treated her more abusively after that. (A representative for Warner did not immediately reply to a request for comment.)

“This suit by this survivor is a giant step in bringing light and heat to an industry that has been hiding perils in plain sight. It’s time to face the music.”

Doe’s attorney Jeff anderson

A substantial part of the lawsuit claims that Warner’s record labels “were well-aware of Defendant Warner’s obsession with sexual violence and childhood sexual assault.” Marilyn Manson was Nine Inch Nails frontman Trent Reznor’s first signing to his Nothing Records imprint, which was a subsidiary of Interscope. In the lawsuit, Doe alleges that Interscope and Nothing should have safeguarded her from their client’s alleged behavior. “At no time did Defendant Interscope and Defendant Nothing Records have a reasonable system or procedure in place to investigate, supervise, or monitor its staff and/or agents, including Defendant Warner, to prevent pre-sexual grooming and sexual harassment, molestation, and assault of fans, including minors and women,” the suit says. (Representatives for Interscope and its parent company Universal Music Group did not immediately reply to requests for comment.)

In 2021, Reznor addressed a resurfaced passage from Warner’s 1998 autobiography The Long Hard Road Out of Hell in which Warner claims he and Reznor allegedly physically and sexually assaulted a woman in the 1990s.

“I have been vocal over the years about my dislike of Manson as a person and cut ties with him nearly 25 years ago,” Reznor said at the time. “As I said at the time, the passage from Manson’s memoir is a complete fabrication. I was infuriated and offended back when it came out and remain so today.”

“Defendants Interscope and Nothing Records were aware of Defendant Warner’s practice of sexually assaulting minors, and aided and abetted such behavior,” the filing claims. “As a result of Brian Warner’s sexual abuse and assault, enabled and encouraged by Defendants Interscope and Nothing Records, Plaintiff has suffered severe emotional, physical, and psychological distress, including shame, and guilt, economic loss, economic capacity and emotional loss.”

The suit’s claims of negligence against the labels stem from not preventing Warner from allegedly carrying out his abuses on tours they helped finance. “Defendant Interscope and Nothing Records expressly and implicitly represented that the band members, including Defendant Warner, were not a sexual threat to their fans and others who would fall under Defendant Warner’s influence, control direction, and guidance,” the lawsuit claims.

Doe is seeking damages to be determined at trial and an “order enjoining Defendants from future unlawful business practices including, but not limited to, exposing minors and vulnerable adults to sexual abuse and exploitation,” among other prayers for relief.

“This suit by this survivor is a giant step in bringing light and heat to an industry that has been hiding perils in plain sight. It’s time to face the music. New laws give survivors the time to take real action for justice and protection,” Doe’s attorney, Jeff Anderson, says in a statement to Rolling Stone. “Powerful new laws in New York and California give adult survivors the chance to take legal action against predators and those that protect and profit from them.

“We are grateful to the survivors and so many others who now align with us to expose the predators and those in the music industry that have … permitted, promoted, and profiteered from his violence against the vulnerable,” Anderson adds.

“This lawsuit goes beyond the named predator and targets the record labels that packaged and profited from their artist’s criminal behavior, and it is an indictment of the music industry for maintaining a culture that celebrates, protects, and enables sexual predators,” Karen Barth Menzies of KBM Law, an attorney also representing Doe, tells Rolling Stone.

Anderson, the lawyer who for decades has filed suits against the Roman Catholic Church over sexual abuse of children and raised widespread awareness of the scandal, is also representing a woman who recently sued Aerosmith frontman Steven Tyler for sexual assault of a minor. Alongside individual cases, he says in a statement to Rolling Stone, he aims to use “the new laws to expose the perils [and] industry practices that profit from and promote sexual violence against the vulnerable, and the executives in the industry who profit from it and turn a blind eye. It’s time for cleansing and accountability.” 

More than a dozen women have come forward with allegations against Warner over the past two years. Actress Evan Rachel Wood named him as the previously anonymous abuser she’d referenced in interviews and testimonies, on Instagram, on Feb. 1, 2021. “He started grooming me when I was a teenager and horrifically abused me for years,” she wrote. “I was brainwashed and manipulated into submission.”

In addition to sharing their stories publicly, several women, including Game of Thrones actress Esmé Bianco, model Ashley Morgan Smithline, and a former assistant of Warner’s, Ashley Walters, filed civil lawsuits against the singer. Each woman described a similar pattern of alleged grooming and sexual and physical abuse. The women spoke with Rolling Stone for an extensive investigation in 2021. Through his lawyer, Warner  “vehemently denie[d] any and all claims of sexual assault or abuse of anyone” in the Rolling Stone article.

“Victims of his felt completely ashamed that they still didn’t realize what was happening to them until it was way too late,” Bianco said. “He told the whole world and nobody tried to stop him.” Last week, Bianco and Warner reached an out-of-court settlement, whose terms were not disclosed.

Walters’ lawsuit was dismissed over the statute of limitations; Smithline’s was dismissed when she missed a key deadline. A fourth suit by another Jane Doe alleging Warner raped her in 2011 at his home is ongoing. 

An investigation into alleged criminal abuse conducted by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department about Warner concluded last fall when it submitted its findings to the L.A. District Attorney. The D.A.’s office has yet to comment on whether it will be pressing charges.

Last spring, Wood intensified her accusations against Warner in the HBO documentary, Phoenix Rising. In the two-part docuseries, she alleged he threatened her and her family if she spoke out and described how he had initially hit on her, saying he was a fan of the movie Thirteen. She was 14 when she appeared in the movie; he approached her at age 18.

Just before the release of Phoenix Rising, Warner filed a lawsuit against Wood and her friend Illma Gore alleging defamation, emotional distress, and “impersonation over the internet,” among other charges. 

In an appearance on The View, Wood claimed she was not scared of the lawsuit. “I am very confident that I have the truth on my side and that the truth will come out,” she said. “This is clearly timed before the documentary. … I’m not doing this [film] to clear my name. I’m doing this to protect people. I’m doing this to sound the alarm that there is a dangerous person out there and I don’t want anybody getting near him. So people can think whatever they want about me. I have to let the legal process run its course, and I’m steady as a rock.”

Trending

Jane Doe v. Brian Warner, Interscope, Nothing Records



Read original article here

NYPD sued for shooting death of Edward Wilkins by cop Sean Armstead

The mother of the dog-walker who was fatally shot by his lover’s cop husband last year has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the NYPD, claiming her son’s killer never should have had a gun.

Edward Wilkins, 20, was gunned down by Officer Sean Armstead, 36, who then killed himself outside a Buffalo Wild Wings in Wallkill on May 8, 2022, because he suspected the younger man of having an affair with his wife, Alexandra Vanderheyden, 35.

Wilkins’ mother Helena Dow on Thursday sued the NYPD, claiming the department should have known that Armstead was suffering from mental health problems and that he shouldn’t have been allowed to have a gun — or even become a cop, according to the filing in Manhattan Supreme Court.

Armstead — who was supposed to be working a midnight shift in the PSA 8 in the Bronx — had called out sick the day of the murder and was “negligently permitted to take possession of his service handgun and three clips of ammunition,” the suit alleges.

Edward Wilkins’ mother is suing the NYPD after her son was shot by a cop who suspected him of sleeping with his wife.
specia1.ed/TikTok

The jealous cop tracked down Vanderheyden and Wilkins — an employee of her dog walking business — to a La Quinta Inn in Wallkill upstate.

He later crashed his car into Wilkins after chasing him down on NY-211 before Wilkins fled on foot.

Wilkins — who only made it as far as a Buffalo Wild Wings parking lot — was shot by Armstead 11 times outside the restaurant, the suit claims.

Vanderheyden, who was with Armstead for nine years, arrived at the scene to find both men dead after her husband also shot himself, sources told The Post in May.


Armstead was with Vanderheyden for nine years.
Facebook/alexandravanderheyden

Armstead “was negligently permitted to take possession of his service handgun and three clips of ammunition even though he had previously called in sick, was therefore off-duty, and had no legitimate reason to possess” the gun, the suit claims.

And the 11-year veteran cop was, “suffering from mental illness, was a known risk to engage in violence, and was psychologically and emotionally unfit to be a police officer and possess a dangerous …handgun,” the lawsuit alleges.

The NYPD was negligent in “supervising Armstead and entrusting him with a handgun,” which “was a substantial factor and a proximate cause of the death,” of Wilkins, the suit claims.


Armstead was on the force since 2011 and had called out sick on the day of the murder.

Leading up to the tragic murder, Wilkins endured “pre-impact terror and suffered excruciating pain… and agony including fear of imminent death as his motor vehicle was rammed by Armstead,” the filing claims.

Dow is suing for unspecified damages. Her suit also names Armstead’s estate.

Dow’s lawyer Michael Kolb, of law firm O’Connor & Partners, PLLC, told The Post, “I can confirm that [Dow] is [Wilkins’] mother and this matter has been very difficult for her.”

He declined to comment further.


Armstead chased Elkins down by car before crashing into him and then shooting Elkins outside a Buffalo Wild Wings.
James Messerschmidt

Vanderheyden is not named as a defendant in the suit. A working number could not be found for her Thursday.

The NYPD declined to comment as the case is pending.

The Orange County Commissioner of Finance is listed as the administrator of Armstead’s estate. A lawyer for the estate declined to comment.

Additional reporting by Craig McCarthy

Read original article here

Twitter sued for not paying rent at San Francisco HQ


Twitter headquarters is seen in San Francisco on Nov. 18, 2022. 

Anadolu Agency/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

Twitter was sued for millions of dollars over allegations of unpaid rent at the company’s San Francisco headquarters, according to a lawsuit filed on Friday, Jan. 20.

The suit is the culmination of monthslong rumors that under new CEO Elon Musk, Twitter hasn’t been paying rent on its headquarters at 1355 Market St. Those rumors were originally reported by the New York Times. In the interim, two other unrelated lawsuits have been filed against Twitter for nonpayments. Additional stories have emerged that Twitter isn’t paying for janitorial services at its headquarters and that certain rooms in the headquarters have been equipped with beds, the latter of which led to a still-open investigation by San Francisco’s Planning Department and Department of Building Inspection.

Shorenstein, the real estate investment company that originally acquired the building at 1355 Market St. in 2011, alleged in the suit that Twitter owes $3.162 million in unpaid rent for Jan. 2023 — plus interest and late fees. The suit alleged that Twitter didn’t pay rent in Dec. 2022 either; Shorenstein was able to obtain the December rent amount from Twitter’s $3.6 million letter of credit, which functionally served as a security deposit. The real estate company then took roughly $265,000 from the remaining letter of credit to cover a chunk of the January rent. That letter of credit balance has now been drawn down to $1, according to the lawsuit.

Shorenstein said in the suit that as a result of the Musk buyout last October, Twitter’s letter of credit was supposed to increase well beyond $3.6 million — by a sum of $10 million, in fact. But Shorenstein alleged that Twitter has refused to replenish the amount withdrawn from its letter of credit to cover rent owed, and has also refused to bump up its letter of credit by $10 million.

Via a representative, Shorenstein declined to comment on the lawsuit. Twitter’s communications department was eliminated after Musk became CEO.



Read original article here

New York sued by environmental group after approval of crypto mining facility: Report

The New York Public Service Commission (PSC) was sued by environmental activists on Jan. 13 for approving the takeover of a cryptocurrency mining facility in the state.

According to The Guardian, the state Public Service Commission (PSC) is responsible for regulating public utilities, and authorized in September 2022 the conversion of the Fortistar North power plant into a crypto mining site.

The facility is located in Tonawanda, a city less than ten miles from Niagara Falls, and was set to be taken over by the Canadian crypto mining firm Digihost.

Plaintiffs claim that the approval violates New York’s climate law of 2019. The Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) sets the goal of reducing 85% in statewide emissions by 2050, and zero-emissions electricity by 2040, among other targets.

In the lawsuit, the Clean Air Coalition of Western New York and the Sierra Club are represented by the non-profit Earthjustice, claiming that the Fortistar plant was only operated during periods of high demand for electricity, such as extreme weather conditions. As a crypto mining plant, however, the site would be running 24 hours a day, generating up to 3,000% more greenhouse gas emissions.

Related: 1.5M houses could be powered by the energy Texas miners returned

Activists argue that the New York state must conduct environmental reviews when examining projects.

In October 2021, a letter from a group of local business requested the state to deny the power plant conversion to a crypto mining facility, claiming that:

“Proof-of-Work cryptocurrency mining uses enormous amounts of energy to power the computers needed to conduct business — should this activity expand in New York, it could drastically undermine New York’s climate goals established under the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act.”

According to public filings, Digihost planned to convert the facility to renewable natural gas to reduce its environmental impact. The company also noted that the mining site was approved by the North Tonawanda planning commission, which performs environmental reviews before making decisions.

In August, Digihost also disclosed plans to move part of its mining rigs from New York to Alabama in an effort to lower energy costs, Cointelegraph reported.

Digihost did not immediately respond to Cointelegraph’s request for comment.

Read original article here

Twitter sued over $136,260 in unpaid rent after Elon Musk takeover | Twitter

Elon Musk is trying to slash expenses at Twitter as close to zero as possible while his personal wealth shrinks – and this apparently has included falling behind on rent payments at the company’s offices.

Twitter owes $136,260 (£113,601) in overdue rent on its offices on the 30th floor of a building in downtown San Francisco, according to a lawsuit filed by the building’s landlord last week.

The landlord at 650 California Street, which is not Twitter’s main San Francisco headquarters, served a notice to the social media company on 16 December informing it that it would be in default if it didn’t pay within five days. The five days elapsed without payment, according to the lawsuit.

The landlord, Columbia REIT 650 California LLC, is seeking damages totaling the back rent, as well as attorney’s fees and other expenses. Twitter signed a seven-year lease for the offices in 2017. The monthly rent was $107,526.50 (£89,646) in the first full year and increased gradually to $128,397 (£107,045) in the seventh year.

Twitter did not respond to a message for comment. The company no longer has a media relations department.

Musk bought Twitter for $44bn (£37bn) in October 2022 and the company is on the hook for about $1bn a year in interest payments from the deal. Most of Musk’s wealth is tied to his ownership of Tesla shares, which have lost more than half of their value since he took ownership of Twitter. He has sold nearly $23bn (£19bn) worth of the electric vehicle company’s stock to fund the purchase since April, when he started building a position in Twitter. He’s even lost the top spot for the world’s wealthiest person, according to Forbes.

Musk defended his extreme cost-cutting measures last month in a late night Twitter Spaces call.

“This company is like, basically, you’re in a plane that is headed towards the ground at high speed with the engines on fire and the controls don’t work,” Musk said on 21 December.

The company’s headquarters are located at another San Francisco address, 1355 Market Street, where Twitter has also reportedly fallen behind on rent, according to the New York Times.

In addition to not paying rent and laying off workers, Musk’s Twitter is also auctioning off high-end office furniture, kitchen equipment and other relics from the past, when Twitter had over 7,500 full-time workers around the world and free lunch and other office perks were common. Some three-quarters of Twitter’s employee base is estimated to have left the company, either because they were laid off, fired or quit.

Among the items Twitter is auctioning off are a pizza oven, a 40-quart commercial kitchen floor mixer (retails for around $18,000; bidding starts at $25), and high-end designer furniture such as Eames chairs from Herman Miller and Knoll Diamond chairs that retail in the thousands.

Even a Twitter bird statue (bidding starts at $25) and a neon Twitter bird light display (bidding starts at $50) are up for grabs in this fire sale-style auction reminiscent of the dotcom bust of the early 2000s when failed tech startups were selling off their decadent office wares.

Read original article here

Twitter sued for not paying rent on San Francisco HQ since Elon Musk takeover

Twitter is being sued by its landlord for ducking out on rent for its downtown San Francisco headquarters, where the platform reportedly went through heavy cost-cutting under new CEO Elon Musk.

The company owes $136,260 in unpaid rent, according to the lawsuit filed Thursday by Columbia Property Trust.

Twitter’s freeloading was reported early last month by the New York Times, which wrote Musk and his advisors hoped to renegotiate terms of lease agreements after mass layoffs.

The downsizing has already begun.

Twitter closed its Seattle offices, The Times reported Friday — cutting janitorial and security services. Employees were left bringing their own toilet paper to work, according to the report.

Musk purchased Twitter for $44 billion in October and has been cutting costs ever since, amid what Musk admitted was a “massive drop” in revenue.

Cleaning and security staff were also laid off from the company’s New York and San Francisco offices, where workers struck for higher pay. In San Francisco, Musk condensed the company’s footprint at 650 California Street from four floors to two, the Times reported.

Twitter’s San Francisco officers are located in the Hartford Building at 650 California Street.
Getty Images

On Christmas Eve, Musk ordered staff out to a data center in Sacramento to shutdown key servers as a cost-cutting measuring, the Times reported.

Meanwhile, layoffs have continued, with cuts to the company’s infrastructure and public policy divisions last week, the report said.

Employees have been directed to delay paying contractors or vendors — including accountants and consultants working on key regulatory projects, the Times reported.

The company is also being sued for failing to pay almost $200,000 for private charter flights made the week Musk took over.

Employees expect more layoffs to come, the report revealed.

The company owes $136,260 in unpaid rent, according to the suit filed Thursday by landlord Columbia Property Trust.
Getty Images for The Met Museum/

Twitter did not return a request for comment regarding the new lawsuit.

Musk has pledged to step down from leading the company after conducting a poll on whether he should step down. A successor has yet to be chosen.

The multi-billionaire’s purchase of the social media company made him the first person ever to lose $200 billion, a report found.

Read original article here

Twitter sued after Elon Musk failed to pay rent on San Francisco offices

Elon Musk’s Twitter is being sued by the tech giant’s landlord in San Francisco for non-payment of rent.  

Musk owes $136,250 in back rent for the offices, according to Bloomberg. Earlier this week, it was reported that Twitter is being evicted from other offices across the world for the same reasons. 

The company’s landlord Columbia Reit filed a complaint in court in San Francisco on Thursday alleging that it told Twitter on the 16th of December that they would have to vacate the offices within five days, they did not comply, reports Bloomberg. 

At the time of writing, there has been no public statement from Twitter on the spate of missed rent payments. The company is also being sued for non-payment of charter flights. 

Musk owes $136,250 in back rent for the offices, according to Bloomberg

The offices are located on the 30th floor of the Hartford Building at 650 California Street in the city’s financial district. The building’s other tenants include Omnicom Group, Affirm and Credit Suisse. 

The building is not the company’s headquarters, which are located along Market Street, less than two miles away from the California Street location.

Earlier this week, it was reported that Musk was no longer paying rent on Twitter’s Seattle office and was also plotting to shutter one of the firm’s New York offices. 

The San Francisco headquarters has been condensed from four floors to two, with luxurious perks now reportedly scrapped in favor of stinky offices that are no longer cleaned.

And one of the travel expenses Musk has refused to pay included a $197,725 tab for private flights which were taken the very week he took over the company. 

Numerous other travel vendors have also gone unpaid, according to the Times. 

The payment over that private charter bill has gone to court in New Hampshire.

In another drastic change, the billionaire sent staff to a Sacramento data storage facility to shut down servers on Christmas Eve. The center was one of three critical server facilities that had kept the social network running smoothly.

Some expressed concern that losing the servers could cause problems but were told the priority was to save money, according to the New York Times.

Some workers were hauled into work during the festive period because systems went down and internal data was potentially lost.

Twitter has stopped paying millions of dollars in rent and services in the past few months – with Musk ordering his staff to renegotiate the agreements or end them completely.

Billionaire Tesla chief Elon Musk on October 26, 2022 shows himself carrying a sink as he enters the Twitter headquarters in San Francisco

Pictured, Twitter’s California HQ. The landlord that is suing Twitter is not for the company’s headquarters, which are located along Market Street, less than two miles away from the California Street location

The company is facing eviction from its Seattle office after failing to pay rent on the building, with security personnel also being cut in Musk’s money-saving spree.

In San Francisco, he has consolidated workers onto two floors and closed four, sacking janitors after workers went on strike for better wages.

It has left the office reeking of leftover takeout and body odor according to current and former employees.

Bathrooms have been left dirty, and Musk is now turning his efforts to weed out the sources of leaks to the press regarding the company.

He is focusing on eliminating people inside the company that he believes are opposed to him – as well as being described as having an ‘erratic’ management style.

Staff claim that he often interrupts meetings at random and talks for long stretches, demanding top leaders be sounding boards for his ideas.

Many employees are expecting more layoffs as US revenue numbers continue to flag – despite Musk hiring several new employees to replace those terminated during the mass layoffs.

The SpaceX boss said on a live Twitter forum last week that the company is a ‘plane that is headed towards the ground at high speed with the engines on fire and the controls don’t work.’

He claims that Twitter is on track to have a ‘negative cash flow situation’ of about $3billion in 2023 – attributing it to his ‘crazy’ cost-cutting.

Musk said he will appoint a new CEO of Twitter, after putting it to a vote on the social media platform.

Since early November he sought to save around $500 million in non-labor costs and has laid off nearly 75 per cent of the company’s workforce since taking over.

Musk’s acquisition of Twitter has also been partly-blamed for the 70 percent drop in the share price of his electric car firm Tesla.

Key investors there are said to be upset he is not giving the pioneering firm his undivided attention.  

Read original article here

Aerosmith’s Steven Tyler sued for 1970s sexual battery and assault of minor | Pop and rock

A woman who says she had a sexual relationship with Aerosmith frontman Steven Tyler when she was 16 is suing him in California, under a state law that has temporarily extended the statute of limitations for adults to take legal action on sexual abuse they suffered as children.

Julia Holcomb Misley, who has spoken out publicly for years about Tyler’s treatment of her as a teenager, filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles on Tuesday alleging sexual battery, sexual assault and intentional infliction of distress during a three-year period in the 1970s.

“Because I know that I am not the only one who suffered abuse in the music industry, I feel it is time for me to take this stand,” Misley, now 65, said in a statement. She said the goal of her lawsuit was to “make the music industry safer, expose the predators in it, and expose those forces in the industry that have both enabled and created a culture of permissiveness and self-protection of themselves and the celebrity offenders among them”.

While the lawsuit does not name Tyler, referring to him only as “Doe 1”, a “well-known musician and rock star”, the complaint quotes directly from Tyler’s 2011 memoir, Does the Noise in My Head Bother You?, in which the rock star describes his sexual relationship with a 16-year-old girl he picked up after a show in 1973, including convincing her parents to give him legal custody of her, “so I wouldn’t get arrested if I took her out of state”.

However, Misley’s lawyers named Tyler in a press release about the case. Representatives for the singer did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

In the lawsuit, Misley says that the rock star met her after a concert in Portland in 1973, when she had just turned 16, and that he took her back to a hotel, where she told him her age and described her troubled family background. The musician “performed various acts of criminal sexual conduct”, and then sent her home in a taxi, according to the lawsuit.

He soon followed up to offer her a ticket to another show, saying “he would buy the plane ticket so that she could travel separately from him since she was a minor and could not travel with [him] across state lines”.

He would go on to use his power and influence as a prominent rock star to “groom, manipulate, exploit, [and] sexually assault” the teenager “over the course of three years in numerous states across the country”, including in California, the lawsuit alleges.

Julia Holcomb Misley and Steven Tyler in Inglewood, California, in 1975. Photograph: Mark Sullivan/Contour by Getty Images

After her sophomore year in high school, the lawsuit alleges, the rock star brought the teenager to stay with him in Boston, then convinced her not to return home to school, but travel with him on the road instead. He convinced her mother to allow him to become her legal guardian, “promising he would enroll her in school” and provide her with better support than her mother could, but in fact, only “continued to travel with, assault and provide alcohol and drugs” to her.

When Misley became pregnant, in 1975, the rock star was now “both the father of Plaintiff’s unborn child and her legal guardian”, the suit alleges, and he told her not to seek appropriate prenatal care, worried “he would get in trouble” with doctors.

Later, after she was trapped inside a burning apartment and suffered from smoke inhalation, he coerced her to get an abortion, causing her years of distress, the lawsuit alleges.

Misley’s relationship with Tyler was well documented: “Julia Holcomb” was named in a 1976 Rolling Stone profile of the rock star, in which she was portrayed as a girlfriend who was constantly in his company. The two had been photographed together, and Misley was interviewed about her interactions with Tyler in a 2021 documentary, Look Away, which focused on the abuse of young women in the music industry during the 70s and 80s.

Tyler’s 2011 memoir devotes several pages to his upbeat and sexually graphic recollections of a three-year relationship with an anonymous teenage “groupie” he compares to Kate Hudson’s character in the film Almost Famous, writing that he was “so in love I almost took a teen bride”.

“With my bad self being twenty-six and she barely old enough to drive and sexy as hell, I just fell madly in love with her,” Tyler wrote.

A “Julia Halcomb” is named in his book’s acknowledgments. In Misley’s lawsuit, she accuses the rock star of inflicting additional emotional distress on her through the “involuntary infamy” of being described in graphic terms in his memoirs, which created additional trauma, and deep feelings of shame, humiliation and fear in her.

Misley “was in line at a grocery store and saw a picture of herself on a tabloid that referred to her as DEFENDANT DOE 1’s teen lover. The caption under Plaintiff’s photo read, ‘She was 15 when they fell in love. He’s described her as having “more legs than a bucket of chicken,”’” the lawsuit alleges. The same tabloid story included explicit details of her coerced abortion.

Misley has since become an anti-abortion advocate in the US, speaking and writing about her experience with Tyler in the context of campaigns to limit abortion rights, including an interview with Fox News’ Tucker Carlson and a long written piece on an anti-abortion advocacy site. Her lawsuit and statements emphasised the importance of her Catholic faith, and said that she believed safety inside the Catholic church had been improved because of legal efforts to tackle the sexual abuse of children within the church.

Misley’s lawsuit was filed just days before the end of a three-year window, created by a 2019 California law, that gave adult survivors a chance to file lawsuits about child sexual abuse that occurred decades ago.

The impending deadline has resulted in a flood of new lawsuits, including more than 2,000 against the Catholic church, the Los Angeles Times reported.

The Associated Press contributed reporting

Read original article here