Tag Archives: staffers

Three London hospital staffers under investigation over alleged Kate Middleton medical records breach: report – New York Post

  1. Three London hospital staffers under investigation over alleged Kate Middleton medical records breach: report New York Post
  2. Kate’s photo of late Queen was doctored, agency says, as princess spotted in public for first time in months CNN
  3. Did UK hospital staff try to snoop on Kate’s medical records? A privacy watchdog is investigating Yahoo! Voices
  4. Kate hospital says any privacy breach would be investigated BBC.com
  5. CEO of London Clinic speaks out on Kate Middleton document breach investigation: All ‘disciplinary steps’ will be taken New York Post

Read original article here

‘I captured one!’ — IDF recordings show more UNRWA staffers bragging of Oct. 7 crimes – The Times of Israel

  1. ‘I captured one!’ — IDF recordings show more UNRWA staffers bragging of Oct. 7 crimes The Times of Israel
  2. UN: ‘Reasonable grounds’ to believe Hamas raped women on Oct. 7 The Associated Press
  3. UN agency accuses Israel of detaining, coercing staffers into false confessions about ties to Hamas CNN
  4. UN Report Finds ‘Clear Evidence of Sexual Violence and Rape’ Against Israeli Victims of Hamas’ Oct 7. Attack, Hostages – Israel News Haaretz
  5. IDF implicates more UNRWA officials in October 7 massacre following release of recordings The Jerusalem Post

Read original article here

Anna Wintour ‘did not remove her sunglasses’ while laying off Pitchfork staffers: report – New York Post

  1. Anna Wintour ‘did not remove her sunglasses’ while laying off Pitchfork staffers: report New York Post
  2. Anna Wintour Kept Her Sunglasses On the Entire Time She Was Telling Pitchfork Staffers They Were Getting Laid Off, Writer Says Variety
  3. Opinion: Pitchfork News Is Devastating for Music Criticism. Here’s Why Reviews Matter. · Feature RA Resident Advisor
  4. Pitchfork GQ: it was always clear what the music review site’s new owner really wanted. Slate
  5. Condé Nast honcho Anna Wintour failed to remove signature shades while laying off staff, impacted writer says Fox News

Read original article here

Royal staffers ‘furious’ over book revelations about Prince Harry and William’s feud as Queen lay dying: report – New York Post

  1. Royal staffers ‘furious’ over book revelations about Prince Harry and William’s feud as Queen lay dying: report New York Post
  2. “Omid Scobie’s Still Useful To Them” Kinsey Schofield On Bombshell Book By Harry and Meghan’s Friend TalkTV
  3. Prince Harry and Prince William’s Relationship Beyond Repair (Exclusive) PEOPLE
  4. Prince Harry ‘completely by himself’ amid Queen Elizabeth’s final hours, Omid Scobie claims The Killeen Daily Herald
  5. Prince Harry ‘Found Out About Queen Elizabeth’s Death By News Alert On Phone’ TalkTV
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

‘Tonight Show’ staffers defend Jimmy Fallon after ‘toxic’ work environment claims: report – Page Six

  1. ‘Tonight Show’ staffers defend Jimmy Fallon after ‘toxic’ work environment claims: report Page Six
  2. Jimmy Fallon apologizes to Tonight Show staff for toxic work culture CBC News: The National
  3. Jerry Seinfeld Responds to The Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon Exposé Incident as an “Idiotic Twisting of Events” MovieWeb
  4. ‘The Tonight Show staffers quash ‘toxic workplace claims about Jimmy Fallon Geo News
  5. “Everybody walked on eggshells”: After Ellen DeGeneres, Jimmy Fallon Accused of Toxic Workplace Behavior as Staff Compare Affable Host to James McAvoy’s Terrifying Character FandomWire

Read original article here

Jimmy Fallon Apologizes to Staffers Following Report of Toxic Workplace Behavior: ‘It’s Embarrassing And I Feel So Bad’ – Variety

  1. Jimmy Fallon Apologizes to Staffers Following Report of Toxic Workplace Behavior: ‘It’s Embarrassing And I Feel So Bad’ Variety
  2. Former Jimmy Fallon employees claim ‘toxic’ work environment KTLA 5
  3. Chaos, Comedy, and ‘Crying Rooms’: Inside Jimmy Fallon’s ‘Tonight Show’ Rolling Stone
  4. Jimmy Fallon’s ‘erratic behavior’ left ‘Tonight Show’ employees in a ‘constant state of fear’: report Fox News
  5. ‘The Tonight Show’ Staffers Defend Jimmy Fallon After ‘Toxic Workplace’ and ‘Erratic Behavior’ Accusations PEOPLE
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Palm Beach Central staffers may have known about alleged sexual assault of girl months before parents – WPTV News Channel 5 West Palm

  1. Palm Beach Central staffers may have known about alleged sexual assault of girl months before parents WPTV News Channel 5 West Palm
  2. Boy accused of assault is related to Palm Beach Central official charged with failing to report it Palm Beach Post
  3. Nonprofit reports ‘massive’ uptick in child abuse, neglect allegations WPTV News – FL Palm Beaches and Treasure Coast
  4. 5 Florida school employees accused of failing to report student’s sexual assault WKMG News 6 & ClickOrlando
  5. 5 Palm Beach County school employees arrested for alleged failure to report student’s sexual assault CNN

Read original article here

‘The Kelly Clarkson Show’ Accused of Being a Toxic Work Environment by Former and Current Staffers – Entertainment Tonight

  1. ‘The Kelly Clarkson Show’ Accused of Being a Toxic Work Environment by Former and Current Staffers Entertainment Tonight
  2. ‘The Kelly Clarkson Show’ Is Toxic Behind the Scenes, Staffers Say Rolling Stone
  3. ‘Kelly Clarkson Show’ is ‘traumatizing’ workplace run by ‘monster’: staffers Page Six
  4. The Kelly Clarkson Show accused of toxicity behind the scenes The A.V. Club
  5. ‘The Kelly Clarkson Show’ Staffers Reportedly “Traumatized” by Toxic Workplace: “Worst Experience I’ve Ever Had in My Life” msnNOW
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

School downplayed warnings about 6-year-old before teacher’s shooting, staffers say

The Virginia teacher who was shot by a 6-year-old student repeatedly asked administrators for help with the boy but officials downplayed educators’ warnings about his behavior, including dismissing his threat to light a teacher on fire and watch her die, according to messages from teachers obtained by The Washington Post.

The previously unreported incidents raise fresh questions about how Richneck Elementary School in Newport News handled the troubled student before police say he shot Abigail Zwerner as she taught her first-grade class earlier this month. Authorities have called the shooting “intentional” but are still investigating the motive.

Many parents are already outraged over Richneck officials’ management of events before the shooting. Newport News Superintendent George Parker III has said school officials got a tip the boy had a gun that day and searched his backpack, but that staffers never found the weapon before authorities say the 6-year-old shot Zwerner. Newport News Police Chief Steve Drew said his department was not contacted about the report that the boy had a weapon before the shooting.

Police and school officials have repeatedly declined to answer questions about the boy’s disciplinary issues or worrisome behaviors the 6-year-old may have exhibited and how school officials responded, citing the child’s age and the ongoing law enforcement investigation. The boy’s family said in a statement he has an “acute disability,” but James Ellenson, an attorney for the family, declined to comment on accounts of the boy’s behavior or how it was handled by the school.

School district spokeswoman Michelle Price said in a phone interview late Friday that the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, a federal law protecting students’ privacy, prohibits her from releasing information related to the 6-year-old.

“I cannot share any information in a child’s educational record,” she said. “A lot of what you’re asking is part of the child’s educational record, and it’s also a matter of an ongoing police investigation and an internal school investigation. Unfortunately, some of these details I’m not even privy to.”

6-year-old who allegedly shot Va. teacher used gun legally purchased by mom, police say

Screenshots of a conversation held online between school employees and Parker shortly after the shooting show educators claiming that Zwerner raised alarms about the 6-year-old and sought assistance during the school year.

“she had asked for help,” one staffer wrote in that chat, referring to Zwerner.

“several times,” came another message.

The messages, which were provided to The Post by the spouse of a Richneck Elementary schoolteacher, do not detail what specific assistance Zwerner sought, or to whom she directed her requests. Zwerner and her family have not returned repeated messages from The Washington Post.

A separate message written by a Richneck teacher, and obtained by The Washington Post from the local teachers union, alleges that school administrators waved away grave concerns about the 6-year-old’s conduct and that the school was overall unable to care for him properly.

Authorities explained the timeline of events that took place after a six-year-old child shot his teacher on Jan. 6 in Richneck Elementary School in Virginia. (Video: The Washington Post)

The Post obtained the message on the condition the teacher’s identity not be revealed because the union feared she would face retaliation. The teacher declined interview requests through the union, the Newport News Education Association, citing worries of professional consequences and a directive from Newport News schools not to talk to the media about the shooting.

On one occasion, the boy wrote a note telling a teacher he hated her and wanted to light her on fire and watch her die, according to the teacher’s account. Alarmed, the teacher brought the note to the attention of Richneck administrators and was told to drop the matter, according to the account. The date of the incident was not mentioned.

The principal and vice principal of the school did not respond to requests for comment on the teacher’s account.

A 6-year-old is accused of shooting someone at school. He isn’t the first.

On a second occasion, the boy threw furniture and other items in class, prompting students to hide beneath their desks, according to the account. Another time, the teacher alleges in her account, the boy barricaded the doors to a classroom, preventing a teacher and students from leaving.

The teacher banged on the classroom door until another teacher from across the hall forced it open from the outside, according to the teacher’s account. It was not clear whether the teacher asked for any specific action from administrators after that incident.

The teacher also described strained resources at the school. The lead special education teacher was frustrated because she has a high caseload, according to the account. Some aides regularly missed work, including for as long as a week at a time.

The teacher further alleged in her account that the boy was not receiving the educational services he needed, that it was difficult to get help with him during outbursts and that he was sometimes seen wandering the school unsupervised.

The boy’s family said in a statement Thursday, the first public remarks his relatives have given about the shooting, that the 6-year-old was “under a care plan” that “included his mother or father attending school with him and accompanying him to class every day.” That stopped the week of the shooting, the statement said.

“We will regret our absence on this day for the rest of our lives,” the statement read.

The teacher’s account dovetails with descriptions of the student’s behavior shared by the spouse of a Richneck teacher and a mother whose child is enrolled in a class located across the hallway from Zwerner’s. Both the spouse and the mother, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to protect their families’ privacy, said the student was known campuswide for disruptive and violent behavior, and that school employees struggled to manage him in class.

The Post reached out to dozens of other Richneck teaching staff, administrators and parents to try to corroborate the teachers’ allegations, but most have not responded or declined interviews, citing the ongoing police investigation or fear of reprisals.

Drew, the police chief, has said detectives will look into allegations of the student’s troubling conduct before the incident, though he has not confirmed any specific incidents.

James Graves, president of the Newport News Education Association, said the union is investigating safety concerns raised by teachers in the wake of the shooting.

“We want to know what happened so we can protect our members,” Graves said. “They believe and they know the administration should take their concerns more seriously than they did. This could have been prevented.”

Thomas Britton, whose son was taught by Zwerner, said school officials never formally notified parents in the class about issues with the boy who fired the shot.

He said administrators mishandled the shooting, asserting they should have pulled the boy out of class until they had definitively determined whether he possessed a gun, and conducted a more thorough search.

“That was a shocking revelation that not only did he bring the weapon, but somebody gave a tip he had the weapon,” Britton said. “It seems to me it would be completely avoidable at that point.”

Valerie McCandless, a 52-year-old resident of Newport News who sent six kids to Richneck, said her children had a wonderful experience at the school, but she is troubled that the school’s administrators, some of whom she said are relatively new, failed to take preemptive action.

“I don’t think the teachers there are getting support, they’re not getting compassion, they’re not getting answers, they’re not getting listened to,” she said, adding of the shooting, “this was, I believe, God’s way of saying somebody needs to listen to them.”

Similar concerns emerged this week at a packed Newport News school board meeting, during which dozens of parents recounted their disappointment, anger and frustration with security measures at Richneck and other schools in the district. There have been three shootings on school grounds in Newport News since late 2021.

Several teachers said they received no support when they faced violence in the classroom or attacks from students. Some speakers claimed the district is more interested in keeping discipline statistics low than in taking meaningful action to address students’ problems.

A parent of a child in Zwerner’s class said her daughter had been bullied by classmates. She said she struggled to make the school take her concerns seriously and that the Richneck principal once failed to show for a conference about the bullying, although other officials did come.

She said Zwerner defended her daughter.

“Listen to your teachers when they have concerns,” the woman said raising her voice. “Please!”

Parker, the superintendent, said at a meeting with Richneck students that the district is purchasing 90 metal detectors to install at all Newport News schools and acquiring clear backpacks to hand out to students. He has assigned a new administrator to Richneck and also said officials were taking note of teachers’ concerns.

“We listened and we continue to work to improve current systems and processes to help better manage extreme behaviors that adversely affect the culture and climate in schools,” Parker wrote in a note to staff this week.

Celeste Holliday, a substitute teacher who covered Zwerner’s first-grade class at Richneck Elementary School on one occasion, said Zwerner had difficulty maintaining order in the class of 25 to 30 kids, but Holliday thought she was a conscientious teacher.

“She was great. She was doing the best she could,” Holliday said of Zwerner. “She mentally prepared me. She told me, ‘They’re rambunctious 6-year-olds. It’s going to be a hard day. Do the best you can.’”

Zwerner’s warning proved prescient.

Holliday said the class was rowdier than many others for which she has substituted. Holliday said that, on the day she worked at Richneck, one boy shoved another during recess and the boy scraped his knee. The injured boy had to go to the nurse’s office for treatment.

Afterward, the principal came to the classroom and told the boys to calm down because they were shouting, Holliday said. The principal filed a report about the shoving incident. Holliday said that, after the experience, she decided she would not substitute at Richneck Elementary School again.

Drew said in his online chat that detectives have wrapped up interviews with most students but are still seeking school disciplinary records and other materials related to the boy.

When the probe is complete, Drew said the findings will be sent to the Newport News commonwealth’s attorney to decide whether anyone should be charged. Legal experts say it is unlikely the boy will be charged since children under 7 are presumed unable to form the intent to carry out an illegal act under Virginia law. But Drew has said it is possible someone could be charged for failing to secure the gun used in the shooting.

Ellenson, the attorney for the boy’s family, said in an interview that the gun was secured with a trigger lock and kept on the top shelf of the mother’s bedroom closet. Ellenson said it is unclear how the boy got hold of the gun.

Newport News police declined to comment on the family’s characterization that the weapon was stored securely.

The Jan. 6 shooting occurred as school was winding down for the week. Police said the boy pulled out the gun as Zwerner was teaching and shot her.

Zwerner was rushed to the hospital with critical injuries; Drew said she is continuing to recover. Police said the boy brought the gun from home in a backpack.

The boy’s family said in their statement he is in a hospital receiving treatment and expressed sorrow for the shooting.

“We continue to pray for his teacher’s full recovery, and for her loved ones who are undoubtedly upset and concerned,” the statement read. “At the same time, we love our son and are asking that you please include him and our family in your prayers.”

Read original article here

Jan. 6 Committee Staffers Prepare for All-Out Republican Assault – Rolling Stone

Members and staff of the Jan. 6 committee are actively preparing for a multi-pronged Republican revenge campaign when the GOP takes the House next month, anticipating an all-out effort to discredit the panel’s work and punish its workers, according to current and former staff, as well as other sources briefed on the situation.

As the committee readies its final report, staff are also preparing for their investigation to be investigated, including with subpoenas seeking access to a year-and-a-half of their private communications, emails, and other documents, the sources said.

“I was told [months ago] by a superior to fastidiously avoid putting anything in writing or in emails that could one day be used against the committee and our important work,” says one former investigator. “Nothing that could be taken out of context, and nothing that could be held up as some kind of ‘smoking gun’ for the Jim Jordan’s and [Marjorie Taylor Greene’s] of Congress.”

Anticipating GOP attacks, some current and former staff have asked their supervisors if they should preemptively retain lawyers, or at least look into potential attorneys. Earlier this year, various committee staffers were advised to purchase professional liability insurance in anticipation of a coming GOP counter-investigation, according to two sources familiar with the committee’s work. Both sources say they bought it. When asked by Rolling Stone why they decided to purchase the insurance earlier this year, one of them simply said: “Because I’m not a moron.”

Republicans have been overt about their plans to go after the panel. According to a source with direct knowledge of the matter, Donald Trump spoke to House Republican allies earlier this year about potential plans for tearing through the Jan. 6 committee’s undisclosed records and communications, aiming to uncover dirt or unflattering details. Trump even, the source said, privately suggested possible routes of inquiry, including investigating whether committee members leaked details to the press or divulged embarrassing material about the former president and his loyalists. And House Speaker hopeful Kevin McCarthy has publicly indicated plans to investigate the investigators, part of the party’s ongoing quest to insulate Donald Trump from the consequences of Jan. 6. In a letter dated Nov. 30, McCarthy told the committee to preserve its voluminous records.


The committee was already required to preserve its records, with or without McCarthy’s letter. And committee personnel viewed it as a glorified press release. One of the sources familiar with the committee’s work adds that one irony that’s been discussed among certain staff is that the “bad-faith arguments used by Trump and his allies, including Republican House members, to obstruct the select committee’s investigation could come back to haunt them, if used by targets of the incoming majority’s investigations.”

Still, it is unclear what, exactly, House Republicans will be able to get their hands on if — and more likely when — the party begins turning the Jan. 6 committee’s operations inside-out.

“The question isn’t what can be subpoenaed, but what the committee is required to turn over to its successor committee or the National Archives under House rules,” says Michael Stern, an attorney and a former senior counsel to the House of Representatives. “It gets murkier if you are talking about informal staff work product like notes and the like… If the incoming majority thinks that there are things that should have been turned over that were not, or it just wants access to certain information, it could issue subpoenas or take other steps to obtain access to records that are in the hands of individual members and staff. Its options will depend in part on whether the individuals in question are still members or staff of the House in the next Congress.”

The looming attacks add new pressure to an already tense time for the House committee. The panel’s final stretch has been rocked by internal divisions, according to current and former staff, and other sources briefed on the situation.

There have been leaks, “angry” resignations, internal paranoia, finger-pointing, and, above all, bitter disputes over what to include in the final report, the sources recount. Broadly, there have been divisions between committee staffers working on the investigation and members of Congress who serve as the panel’s management. “Remaining staff seem to trust and like one another enough to execute tasks efficiently. But the distrust between management and staff that has unsurprisingly resulted from copious leaks and appallingly bad management for the last 18 months has zapped any remaining goodwill,” one staffer who spoke on the condition of anonymity tells Rolling Stone

“There was a time not so long ago when staff would be happy to work 80 hour weeks and take on seemingly insurmountable tasks because the mission was worth it, management be damned,” the committee staffer says. “It’s hard to get people to give a fuck when the higher ups — management and some members — have routinely shit on the people actually doing the investigation, whether by actually being assholes or just by mismanaging this thing from top to bottom.”

The climate of suspicion between members and staff increased following a November story from The Washington Post, where 15 staffers claimed they felt the committee that committee vice chair Rep. Liz Cheney has ignored or sought to remove important findings about the insurrection that didn’t directly concern former President Trump. Multiple knowledgeable sources confirm to Rolling Stone that a number of current and former Jan. 6 staffres believe that, while the committee went hard at Trump, it too often let his enablers in the GOP elite off easy, as well as that it ignored other conservative drivers behind the “election fraud” conspiracy theories that led to the Capitol assault.

Sources familiar with the matter also tell Rolling Stone that ahead of this month’s planned release of the final report, multiple staffers have departed via “angry” resignations, complaining to their colleagues and other aides on Capitol Hill about missed opportunities and committee members’ perceived personal agendas.

Some staff have also begun to express regret at what they view as fundamental missteps by committee members in failing to more aggressively pursue some witnesses, including Fox News Host Sean Hannity. However, according to people with knowledge of the matter, Hannity was mostly left alone by the committee — and no subpoena was issued to him — in part due to concerns and potential backlash regarding his First Amendment protections as a pro-Trump journalist.

The committee initially wrote to Hannity requesting a voluntary interview with the Fox News host. Hannity’s testimony was necessary, they wrote, because he “had advance knowledge regarding President Trump’s and his legal team’s planning for January 6th” and had “provid[ed] advice” to Trump and his aides about efforts to overturn the election. 

Cheney and committee chair Rep. Bennie Thompson appeared wary of pursuing Hannity more forcefully with a subpoena. In their initial letter, the inquiry leaders tried to frame their requests as unrelated to Hannity’s work in journalism and prohibit questions about “any of your broadcasts or your political views or commentary.”

But some staff now view that cautious approach as a mistake. “[The committee] let him off the hook, but that was the case with a lot of the Republican Party that should have answered for what had happened,” one of these sources says.

Text messages from Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows released by the committee showed  Hannity acting as a de facto arm of the campaign in the wake of the election, offering advice on issues like “Directing legal strategies vs Biden.” 

Trending

The testy final stretch follows a highly successful summer and fall for the panel, in which it earned praise and high ratings with a series of hearings offering shocking revelations about Trump’s clashes with the Secret Service, advance warnings about armed Trump supporters, and Trump’s comments that Vice President Mike Pence “deserved” the threats from MAGA fans. 

Republicans will take over the House at noon on Jan. 3, 2023.



Read original article here

The Ultimate News Site