Tag Archives: spaceships

NASA wants ideas to boost the Hubble Space Telescope into a higher orbit with private spaceships

NASA is looking deeper into the possibility of using a private spacecraft to lift the Hubble Space Telescope to new heights, giving the influential space observatory a new lease on life. 

On Dec. 22, the space agency issued a Request for Information regarding a non-exclusive SpaceX study earlier this year that suggested how the Hubble Space Telescope could be “reboosted” into a higher orbit.

NASA’s request for information, which you can read here, comes as it continues to consider the space telescope’s future and will remain open until Jan. 24, 2023.

Related: The  best Hubble Space Telescope images of all time

Since the start of Hubble’s operations in 1990, the orbit of the space telescope 335 miles (540 kilometers) above Earth has been decaying. Reboosting it to an orbit that is both higher and more stable could add years to Hubble’s operating lifetime delaying the point at which NASA must deorbit or dispose of the telescope.

During its five space shuttle missions to the service Hubble, NASA used the shuttle to reboost the telescope. The last shuttle servicing mission to Hubble was in 2009. NASA retired its shuttle fleet in 2011.

The idea to raise Hubble to a higher orbit using a Dragon spacecraft at no cost to the government was first developed between SpaceX and Polaris Program, a private program of space missions using SpaceX’s Dragon and Starship vehicles funded by billionaire Jared Isaacman. The unfunded agreement between SpaceX and NASA to study the feasibility of reboosting Hubble was then signed in September 2022.

The SpaceX study was designed to help NASA, which currently has no plans to operate or fund a new Hubble servicing mission, determine the commercial possibility of such a mission. The SpaceX study also aimed to lay out the technical challenges of such a servicing endeavor. 

The fact the study is non-exclusive means that other companies are free to propose their own Hubble servicing studies based on the use of different rockets or spacecraft. 

These studies will collect data from Hubble itself and from SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft to assess the possibility of safely rendezvousing and docking with the space telescope before shunting it to a higher stable orbit. The studies are expected to take around 6 months to complete. 

“This study is an exciting example of the innovative approaches NASA is exploring through private-public partnerships,” associate administrator for the Science Mission Directorate at NASA Headquarters in Washington, Thomas Zurbuchen, said in a statement. (opens in new tab) “As our fleet grows, we want to explore a wide range of opportunities to support the most robust, superlative science missions possible.”

The operation to reboost Hubble would demonstrate how older satellites and spacecraft could be given extended operating lives, especially those in near-Earth orbits like the space telescope. 

“SpaceX and the Polaris Program want to expand the boundaries of current technology and explore how commercial partnerships can creatively solve challenging complex problems,” said Jessica Jensen, vice president of Customer Operations & Integration at SpaceX. “Missions such as servicing Hubble would help us expand space capabilities to ultimately help all of us achieve our goals of becoming a space-faring, multiplanetary civilization.”

Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom or on Facebook.



Read original article here

NASA Artemis spaceship’s new moon images are really eerie

When a space rock slams into the moon, the impact crater often stays for billions of years, almost frozen in time.

That’s because, unlike Earth, our lunar satellite has no weather to wash away the collision, nor intense geologic activity to blanket the surface in new rock. NASA’s new Orion spacecraft — which is currently orbiting the moon on a crucial, uncrewed mission to test the capsule’s spaceflight abilities — recently captured detailed images of the moon’s deeply cratered ground. The space agency released these pictures from the Artemis I mission on Nov. 23.

NASA snapped the black and white images with the Orion capsule’s optical navigation camera, which engineers are testing for future moon flights. “Orion uses the optical navigation camera to capture imagery of the Earth and the Moon at different phases and distances, providing an enhanced body of data to certify its effectiveness under different lighting conditions as a way to help orient the spacecraft on future missions with crew,” NASA wrote online.

SEE ALSO:

Why landing a spaceship on the moon is still so challenging

Orion captured some of these images from around 80 miles above the surface. Below are a few of the new pictures of the moon, a barren desert teeming with craters and hills. Crucially, NASA suspects some of the satellite’s craters contain bounties of water ice — a necessary resource for future deep space missions.

NASA’s Orion spacecraft captured new images of the lunar surface.
Credit: NASA

As NASA’s Orion spacecraft flew by the moon on the sixth day of its mission, it captured views of the deeply cratered lunar surface.
Credit: NASA

As NASA’s Orion spacecraft flew by the moon on the sixth day of its mission, it captured views of the deeply cratered lunar surface.
Credit: NASA

Orion’s view of the moon with the blackness of space behind it.
Credit: NASA

Want more science and tech news delivered straight to your inbox? Sign up for Mashable’s Top Stories newsletter today.

The Orion capsule, which will one day carry up to six astronauts, has some major benchmarks just ahead. On Friday evening, NASA will fire the spacecraft’s engines and send it into an orbit (called “distant retrograde orbit”) that will fling it some 50,000 miles beyond the moon. There, it will orbit the moon for over six days. Then Orion will again fire its engines to leave the moon’s gravity and travel back to Earth.

The uncrewed spacecraft is expected to splash down into the Pacific Ocean, off of San Diego, on Dec. 11. If the mission proves successful, astronauts may fly aboard Orion as early as 2024. And though the timeline is ambitious and will likely be pushed back, astronauts may again step foot on the lunar surface as soon as 2025.

This time, they’ll be looking to establish a permanent presence on the resource-rich moon. NASA wants to stay.



Read original article here

Interstellar Travel Could Be Possible Even Without Spaceships, Scientist Says

In about 5 billion years, the Sun will leave the main sequence and become a red giant. It’ll expand and transform into a glowering, malevolent ball and consume and destroy Mercury, Venus, Earth, and probably Mars.

 

Can humanity survive the Sun’s red giant phase? Extraterrestrial Civilizations (ETCs) may have already faced this existential threat.

Could they have survived it by migrating to another star system without the use of spaceships?

Universe Today readers are well-versed in the difficulties of interstellar travel. Our nearest neighboring solar system is the Alpha Centauri system.

If humanity had to flee an existential threat in our Solar System, and if we could identify a planetary home in Alpha Centauri, it would still take us over four years to get there – if we could travel at the speed of light!

It still takes us five years to get an orbiter to Jupiter at our technological stage. There’s lots of talk about generation starships, where humans could live for generations while en route to a distant habitable planet.

Those ships don’t need to reach anywhere near the speed of light; instead, entire generations of humans would live and die on a journey to another star that takes hundreds or thousands of years. It’s fun to think about but pure fantasy at this point.

 

Is there another way we, or other civilizations, could escape our doomed homes?

The author of a new research article in the International Journal of Astrobiology says that ETCs may not need starships to escape existential threats and travel to another star system.

They could instead use free-floating planets, also known as rogue planets. The article is “Migrating extraterrestrial civilizations and interstellar colonization: implications for SETI and SETA”. The author is Irina Romanovskaya. Romanovskaya is a Professor of Physics and Astronomy at Houston Community College.

“I propose that extraterrestrial civilizations may use free-floating planets as interstellar transportation to reach, explore, and colonize planetary systems,” Romanovskaya writes. And when it comes to the search for other civilizations, these efforts could leave technosignatures and artifacts.

“I propose possible technosignatures and artifacts that may be produced by extraterrestrial civilizations using free-floating planets for interstellar migration and interstellar colonization, as well as strategies for the search for their technosignatures and artifacts,” she said.

It’s possible that rogue planets, either in the Milky Way or some of the other hundreds of billions of galaxies, carry their own life with them in subsurface oceans kept warm by radiogenic decay.

 

Then if they meet a star and become gravitationally bound, that life has effectively used a rogue planet to transport itself, hopefully, to somewhere more hospitable. So why couldn’t a civilization mimic that?

We think of free-floating planets as dark, cold, and inhospitable. And they are unless they have warm subsurface oceans. But they also offer some advantages.

“Free-floating planets can provide constant surface gravity, large amounts of space and resources,” Romanovskaya writes. “Free-floating planets with surface and subsurface oceans can provide water as a consumable resource and for protection from space radiation.”

An advanced civilization could also engineer the planet for an even greater advantage by steering it and developing energy sources. Romanovskaya suggests that if we’re on the verge of using controlled fusion, then advanced civilizations might already be using it, which could change a frigid rogue planet into something that could support life.

The author outlines four scenarios where ETCs could take advantage of rogue planets.

The first scenario involves a rogue planet that happens to pass by the home world of an ETC. How often that might occur is tied to the number of rogue planets in general.

 

So far, we don’t know how many there are, but there are certainly some. In 2021, a team of researchers announced the discovery of between 70 and 170 rogue planets, each the size of Jupiter, in one region of the Milky Way. And in 2020, one study suggested there could be as many as 50 billion of them in our galaxy.

Where do they all come from? Most are likely ejected from their solar systems due to gravitational events, but some may form via accretion as stars do.

Another source of rogue planets is our Solar System’s Oort Cloud. If other systems also have a cloud of objects like this, they can be an abundant source of rogue planets ejected by stellar activity.

Romanovskaya writes: “Stars with 1–7 times solar mass undergoing the post-main-sequence evolution, as well as a supernova from a 7–20 times solar mass progenitor, can eject Oort-cloud objects from their systems so that such objects become unbound from their host stars.”

But how often can an ETC, or our civilization, expect a rogue planet to come close enough to hitchhike on? A 2015 study showed that the binary star W0720 (Scholz’s star) passed through our Solar System’s Oort Cloud about 70,000 years ago.

While that was a star and not a planet, it shows that objects pass relatively close by. If the studies that predict billions of free-floating planets are correct, then some of them likely passed close by, or right through, the Oort Cloud long before we had the means to detect them.

The Oort Cloud is a long way away, but a sufficiently advanced civilization could have the capability to see a rogue planet approaching and go out and meet it.

The second scenario involves using technology to steer a rogue planet closer to a civilization’s home. With sufficient technology, they could choose an object from their own Oort Cloud – assuming they have one – and use a propulsion system to direct it towards a safe orbit near their planet.

With sufficient lead time, they could adapt the object to their needs, for example, by building underground shelters and other infrastructure. Maybe, with adequate technology, they could alter or create an atmosphere.

The third scenario is similar to the second one. It also involves an object from the civilization’s outer Solar System. Romanovskaya uses the dwarf planet Sedna in our Solar System as an example.

Sedna has a highly eccentric orbit that takes it from 76 AUs from the Sun to 937 AU in about 11,000 years. With sufficient technology and lead time, an object like Sedna could be turned into an escape ship.

The author notes that “Civilizations capable of doing so would be advanced civilizations that already have their planetary systems explored to the distances of at least 60 AU from their host stars”.

There are lots of potential problems. Bringing a dwarf planet from the distant reaches of the Solar System into the inner Solar System could disrupt the orbits of other planets, leading to all sorts of hazards.

But the dangers are mitigated if a civilization around a post-main sequence star has already migrated outward with the changing habitable zone. Romanovskaya discusses the energy needed and the timing required in more detail in her article.

The fourth scenario also involves objects like Sedna. When a star leaves the main sequence and expands, there’s a critical distance where objects will be ejected from the system rather than remain gravitationally bound to the dying star.

If an ETC could accurately determine when these objects would be ejected as rogue planets, they could prepare it beforehand and ride it out of the dying solar system. That could be extraordinarily perilous, as periods of violent mass loss from the star creates an enormous hazard.

In all of these scenarios, the rogue planet or other body isn’t a permanent home; it’s a lifeboat.

“For all the above scenarios, free-floating planets may not serve as a permanent means of escape from existential threats,” the author explains. “Because of the waning heat production in their interior, such planets eventually fail to sustain oceans of liquid water (if such oceans exist).”

Free-floating planets are also isolated and have fewer resources than planets in a solar system. There are no asteroids to mine, for example, and no free solar energy. There are no seasons and no night and day. There are no plants, animals, or even bacteria. They’re simply a means to an end.

“Therefore, instead of making free-floating planets their permanent homes, extraterrestrial civilizations would use the free-floating planets as interstellar transportation to reach and colonize other planetary systems,” writes Romanovskaya.

In her article, Professor Romanovskaya speculates where this could lead. She envisions a civilization that does this more than once, not to escape a dying star but to spread throughout a galaxy and colonize it.

“In this way, the parent-civilization may create unique and autonomous daughter-civilizations inhabiting different planets, moons, or regions of space.

“A civilization of Cosmic Hitchhikers would act as a ‘parent-civilization’ spreading the seeds of ‘daughter-civilizations’ in the form of its colonies in planetary systems,” she writes. “This applies to both biological and post-biological species.”

Humanity is only in the early stages of protecting ourselves from catastrophic asteroid impacts, and we can’t yet manage our planet’s climate with any degree of stability. So thinking about using rogue planets to keep humanity alive seems pretty far-fetched. But Romanovskaya’s research isn’t about us; it’s about detecting other civilizations.

All of this activity could create technosignatures and artifacts that signified the presence of an ETC. The research article outlines what they might be and how we could detect them. Rogue planets used as lifeboats could create technosignatures like electromagnetic emissions or other phenomena.

An ETC could use solar sails to control a rogue planet or use them on a spaceship launched from a rogue planet once they have reached their destination. In either case, solar sails produce a technosignature: cyclotron radiation.

Maneuvering either a spacecraft or a rogue planet with solar sails would produce “… cyclotron radiation caused by the interaction of the interstellar medium with the magnetic sail”.

Infrared emissions could be another technosignature emitted as waste heat by an ETC on a rogue planet. An excessive amount of infrared or unnatural changes in the amount of infrared could be detected as a technosignature.

Infrared could be emitted unevenly across the planet’s surface, indicating underlying engineering or technology. An unusual mix of different wavelengths of electromagnetic energy could also be a technosignature.

The atmosphere itself, if one existed, could also hold technosignatures. Depending on what was observed, it could contain evidence of terraforming.

For now, astronomers don’t know how many rogue planets there are or if they’re concentrated in some areas of the galaxy. We’re at the starting line when it comes to figuring these things out. But soon, we may get a better idea.

The Vera Rubin Observatory should see first light by 2023. This powerful observatory will image the entire available sky every few nights, and it’ll do it in fine detail. It houses the largest digital camera ever made: a 3.2 gigabyte CCD.

The Vera Rubin will be especially good at detecting transients, that is, anything that changes position or brightness in a couple of days. It’ll have a good chance of spotting any interlopers like rogue planets that might approach our Solar System.

There’s a strong possibility that some of those rogue planets will exhibit unusual emissions or puzzling phenomena. Scientists will probably puzzle over them as they did over Oumuamua.

Maybe another civilization more advanced than us has already faced an existential threat from their dying star. Maybe they made a Herculean effort to capture a rogue planet and engineer it to suit their needs.

Maybe they’ve already boarded it and launched it towards a distant, stable, long-lived yellow star, with rocky planets in its habitable zone. Maybe they’re wondering if there’s any life at their destination and how they might be received after their long journey.

This article was originally published by Universe Today. Read the original article.

 

Read original article here

Tiny laser-propelled spaceships could travel to the far reaches of the solar system and beyond

Miniature spaceships the size of cellphones could fly across the solar system using sails propelled by lasers, which would allow the tiny spacecraft to reach much faster speeds — and, potentially, much more distant destinations — than conventionally powered rockets, a new study finds.

Current spacecraft usually take years to make trips within the solar system; for example, NASA’s New Horizons probe took nearly 10 years to reach Pluto

In theory, spacecraft using conventional rockets would need thousands of years to complete an interstellar voyage. For example, Alpha Centauri, the nearest star system to Earth, lies about 4.37 light-years away — more than 25.6 trillion miles (41.2 trillion kilometers), or more than 276,000 times the distance from Earth to the sun. It would take NASA’s Voyager 1 spacecraft, which launched in 1977 and reached interstellar space in 2012, about 75,000 years to reach Alpha Centauri even if the probe were headed in the right direction, which it’s not.

Related: Is interstellar travel really possible?

The problem with all rocket thrusters is that the propellant they carry with them has mass. Long trips require a lot of propellant, which makes spacecraft heavy, which, in turn, requires more propellant, making them heavier, and so on. 

Previous research has suggested that “light sailing” might be one of the only technically feasible ways to get a spacecraft to another star within a human lifetime. Although light does not exert much pressure, scientists have long suggested that what little pressure it does apply could have a major effect. Indeed, numerous experiments have shown that “solar sails” can rely on sunlight for propulsion if the spacecraft is light enough and has a large enough sail. 

Indeed, the $100 million Breakthrough Starshot initiative, announced in 2016, plans to launch swarms of microchip-size spacecraft to Alpha Centauri, each of them sporting extraordinarily thin, incredibly reflective sails propelled by the most powerful lasers ever built. The plan has them flying at up to 20% the speed of light, reaching Alpha Centauri in about 20 years.

A major challenge Starshot faces is building the lasers needed for propulsion. It calls for a ground-based laser array on the order of 0.4 square miles (1 square kilometer) and as powerful as 100 gigawatts, which would be by far the most powerful laser ever made on Earth.

In the new study, the researchers suggest that a more humble ground-based laser array — one that’s 3.3 to 33 feet (1 to 10 meters) wide and 100 kilowatts to 10 megawatts in power — could still prove useful by sending tiny probes across the solar system, propelling them to much faster speeds than rocket engines could.

“Such lasers can be built already today with a relatively small investment,” study senior author Artur Davoyan, a materials scientist at the University of California, Los Angeles, told Space.com. “We do not need to wait till a 100-gigawatt laser becomes available.”

Going interstellar on a reasonable timescale imposes more constraints than voyaging within the solar system. For instance, Starshot aims to send probes to another star within a human lifetime, so its spacecraft are designed to be extraordinarily lightweight — each just 0.035 ounces (1 gram) or so — to fly as fast as possible given the amount of energy they receive. 

Laser sails for interplanetary voyages, by contrast, do not have to be as lightweight. The scientists envision spacecraft for such trips ranging up to 3.5 ounces (100 g) or so — a mass “comparable with that of a typical cell phone,” Davoyan said.

Whereas Starshot faces mass constraints that make it challenging to fit all the needed spacecraft systems and instruments into a single platform, a 3.5-ounce probe “can easily be equipped with all the needed components, including spectrometers, accelerometers, particle detectors, cameras and so on — all the key ingredients to conduct a proper scientific mission in far reaches of space,” Davoyan said.

Furthermore, because a laser array can launch more than one probe, it could potentially send a fleet of tiny probes, each with different equipment, to a destination. “For example, one may be a magnetometer probe, another equipped with a camera, the third serving as a particle detector,” Davoyan said. “We foresee that many small probes can be sent to really different destinations to do breakthrough science.”

In addition, because interplanetary voyages do not require the kind of powerful lasers needed with Starshot, they also do not require large sails with the kind of extraordinary material properties needed to withstand the many demands of interstellar flight, such as not vaporizing under the light of such a powerful laser. The researchers suggested that silicon nitride or boron nitride sails about 4 inches (10 centimeters) wide should suffice for flights within the solar system.

Related: The solar system: A guide to things orbiting the sun

“Our work is a first step to fast and low-cost interplanetary and deep space missions,” Davoyan said. “We see that a new model for space exploration can emerge, where individual users, which typically do not have access to space, could now spend just a few thousand dollars and launch a real deep space mission.”

Laser arrays on the order of 100 kilowatts are already under development by the U.S. military; in 2020, for instance, the U.S. Navy’s littoral combat ship USS Little Rock received a 150-kilowatt laser. Furthermore, the cost of high-power lasers is rapidly dropping every year, driven by the need for optical telecommunications, with 1-kilowatt lasers available for less than $10,000, Davoyan noted.

“Rough estimates show that [a] 1-megawatt laser beamer could be constructed with less than $100 million, which is far less than most of NASA’s missions,” Davoyan said. “Importantly, once built, the beamer can be used and reused to launch multiple probes in different directions. Essentially, the laser beamer is an initial capital investment and, once built, serves as a launchpad. The mission cost then consists of producing probes, which, with the use of mass manufacturing, can be on the order of $100, launching probes to orbit for less than $100 per probe and then operating a mission during its useful lifetime. Therefore, overall the laser-driven approach offers very low cost for space exploration.”

The scientists estimated that a 0.035-ounce laser sail with a 4-inch sail driven to speeds of about 112,000 mph (180,000 km/h) could reach Mars in 20 days, compared with the 200 days for NASA’s Perseverance rover; Jupiter in 120 days, compared with five years for NASA’s Juno probe; Pluto in less than three years, compared with 10 years for NASA’s New Horizons craft; and 100 times the distance of Earth from the sun in 10 years, compared with nearly 30 years for NASA’s Voyager 1 spacecraft.

“The fact that we can change the way space is being explored already today with a minimal investment is truly energizing,” Davoyan said. “Such an approach allows almost everyone to develop and launch their own mission — something that was not possible before. It would be really exciting to see an undergraduate student sending their own science probe to, say, Jupiter.”

The scientists now hope to test and prototype their ideas. “We are also partnering with industry and government to move further some of the designs and ideas we have,” Davoyan said. “We believe we can make a real difference in the future of space exploration.”

The scientists detailed their findings online Jan. 31 in the journal Nano Letters.

Originally published on Space.com.

Read original article here

SpaceX Has Discovered Urine Leaks on 2 Crew Dragon Spaceships

SpaceX’s first tourist flight seemed to go swimmingly last month, but there was a hidden problem beneath the floorboards.

That issue came from the bathroom — the toilet tucked away in the Crew Dragon spaceship’s ceiling, which is shrouded in proprietary secrecy. A tube carrying urine from that toilet broke loose in an area beneath the spaceship’s cabin floor, releasing its contents onto a fan. That fan is used to create suction for the toilet, which is necessary because when you’re doing in microgravity, there’s no force pulling waste in any one direction. The fan then sprayed the pee all over the hidden compartment.

Even though all of this happened in microgravity, the pee didn’t drift into the cabin. That kept it away from the spaceship’s four passengers: billionaire Jared Isaacman, geoscientist Dr. Sian Proctor, physician-assistant Hayley Arceneaux, and engineer Chris Sembroski. While they orbited Earth for three days, on a mission called Inspiration4, they didn’t notice the issue, SpaceX representatives told reporters on Monday.

The Inspiration4 crew poses in front of the Falcon 9 rocket and Crew Dragon spaceship that will launch them into space.

Inspiration4/John Kraus



“We didn’t really even notice it, the crew didn’t even notice it, until we got back,” SpaceX official Bill Gerstenmaier said in a press conference Monday, according to The New York Times. “When we got the vehicle back, we looked under the floor and saw the fact that there was contamination underneath the floor of Inspiration4.”

A mechanical issue with the toilet fan had, however, set off an alarm while Inspiration4 was in orbit, prompting the passengers to troubleshoot, Isaacman told CNN Business in September. He did not reveal how they solved the problem. Upon the spaceship’s return to Earth, SpaceX technicians opened the cabin floor to investigate the fan issue. That’s when they discovered the pee leak.

As SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has promised on Twitter, the toilet system is getting an upgrade. SpaceX is redesigning the leaky tube beneath Crew Dragon’s floor for its next launch, which will carry four NASA astronauts to the International Space Station this weekend. With the new upgrade, the tube shouldn’t come “unglued” again, Gerstenmaier said.

Pee is also loose in another SpaceX spaceship

Another Crew Dragon capsule is currently attached to the space station, since it carried four astronauts to the space station in April and is waiting to carry them back to Earth in the coming weeks. But it has the same plumbing system as the capsule that suffered a leak.



The Crew-2 astronauts during a training session in Hawthorne, California. Left to right: Thomas Pesquet, Megan McArthur, Shane Kimbrough, and Akihiko Hoshide.

SpaceX



Fearing the same toilet troubles, SpaceX asked the astronauts on the space station to snake a camera on a cable into the pee-tube compartment beneath the floor. Sure enough, they discovered the same issue as Inspiration4.

“Yes, there was some indication of some contamination under the floor,” Gerstenmaier said.

That could be a more serious issue for this spaceship, which has been in Earth’s orbit for nearly six months, and has presumably been carrying loose urine the whole time.

After astronauts pee, that urine gets mixed with a substance called Oxone, which removes ammonia so that it doesn’t build up in the air. But Oxone can be corrosive, so SpaceX is investigating the possibility that the Oxone-pee mixture could have damaged the spaceship after months of floating around beneath its cabin floor.



SpaceX CEO Elon Musk

Britta Pedersen / POOL / AFP via Getty Images


SpaceX engineers tested this theory on the ground, Gerstenmaier said, according to the Times, by gathering some aluminum parts similar to those on the spaceship and soaking them in an oxone-urine mixture. The engineers put those parts in a chamber that imitates the humidity conditions of the space station. They left them there for “an extended period of time,” Gerstenmaier said, though he did not specify for how long.

So far, SpaceX has not found significant corrosion in those samples.

“Luckily, or, on purpose, we chose an aluminum alloy that is very insensitive to corrosion,” Gerstenmaier said.

He also noted that there is less urine inside the Crew Dragon capsule that’s attached to the ISS, since those astronauts were only on the spaceship for about 24 hours before they docked to the space station.

SpaceX’s on-the-ground testing is still ongoing.

“We’ll double check things, we’ll triple checks things, and we got a couple more samples we’ll pull out of the chambers and inspect,” Gerstenmaier said, according to CNN. “But we’ll be ready to go and make sure the crew is safe to return.”



Read original article here

NASA wants to buy more astronaut rides on private spaceships

NASA wants more private-sector firms to ferry astronauts up into space, including missions to and from the International Space Station. The agency has put out a request for information, an initial step towards awarding contracts.

NASA’s announcement comes just days after one such private-sector contractor, Boeing, announced that the next test flight of its Starliner astronaut taxi has been delayed until 2022. Starliner was initially slated to launch in August, before an issue with faulty valves pushed the schedule back into a yet-to-be-determined time next year.

“NASA has a need for additional crew rotation flights to the space station beyond the twelve missions the agency has awarded Boeing and SpaceX under the current contracts,” Phil McAlister, NASA’s director of commercial spaceflight, said in a statement.

Related: Commercial crews and private astronauts will boost International Space Station’s science

Those current contracts date from 2014, when NASA awarded Boeing and SpaceX transport contracts, via the Commercial Crew Program, to carry astronauts to and from the International Space Station following the retirement of the space shuttle in 2011. Boeing’s answer to the contract has been Starliner — a spacecraft that has so far flown only one uncrewed test flight that did not succeed at reaching the space station. 

Meanwhile, SpaceX has already flown three crewed missions to the orbiting lab (two operational missions and one test flight), and the company is getting ready to launch another crew of four astronauts to the station next week. 

NASA’s original plan was for initial commercial crew flights to go up in 2017. But delays on both SpaceX and Boeing’s parts meant that NASA had to continue sending astronauts to the ISS on board Russian Soyuz flights. The first astronauts to arrive at the ISS via a Crew Dragon — Bob Behnken and Doug Hurley — did so in May 2020 with the Demo-2 mission.

NASA astronauts Doug Hurley (foreground) and Bob Behnken give a thumbs up from inside the Crew Dragon capsule ahead of the Demo-2 launch on May 30, 2020. (Image credit: SpaceX/Twitter)

Now, NASA seemingly wants to bolster its list of options. They’ve slated 2027 as a deadline for future flight systems to acquire certification. The number of additional commercial crew missions that NASA intends to fly, as well as the number of seats that the agency intends to purchase on each mission, will be determined “depending on mission requirements.”

NASA’s request for information can be found here.

Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom and on Facebook 



Read original article here