Tag Archives: sexual abuse

Armie Hammer docuseries to remove photo of alleged bite mark

The Armie Hammer docuseries about the sexual abuse allegations against him is making a change following “new information.”

“House of Hammer” will be removing an image of a bite mark that one of Hammer’s exes believed to be a photo of her own body — but is reportedly a picture of a bite mark tattoo taken from Pinterest.

Courtney Vucekovich — one of Hammer’s former partners — accused him of improper sexual behavior and participated in an on-camera interview for the Discovery+ docuseries, where she alleged love-bombing, coercion and abuse.

“He bites really hard,” Vucekovich claimed.

She said that Hammer, 36, allegedly coerced her into multiple BDSM situations that made her feel unsafe, including rope bondage and biting. 

The bite mark as seen on Pinterest.
Pinterest
“House of Hammer” is streaming on Discovery+.
Discovery+

“He tells you to wear them like a badge of honor,” she claimed. “Almost like he convinced me that I’m lucky to have it. As f—ked up as it sounds, at that time, I was interpreting that as love. Looking at it now, makes me sick. He pushes your boundaries a little bit at a time.”

In the docuseries, Vucekovich also said the “Call Me By Your Name” actor once reportedly left her a letter that read, “I am going to bite the f—k out of you,” with his signature. 

As Vucekovich talks about the biting, a photo is shown on screen. She claimed the photo was taken by Hammer and she believes it’s of her own body.

“House of Hammer” will be removing an image of a bite mark that one of Armie Hammer’s exes believed to be a photo of her own body.
Courtney Vucekovich gave an on-camera interview in “House of Hammer.”
Talos Films

Social media users were quick to notice something was off about the photo of the alleged bite mark.

After the discovery, Talos Films is working to remove the image from “House of Hammer,” according to Variety.

“We take seriously the responsibility of representing victims’ stories. When new information came forward about this series we immediately began investigating it and will make any appropriate changes as quickly as possible,” a spokesperson for the production company said in a statement.

“We are proud of those who came forward to share their truth to the public — including Courtney Vucekovich and Casey Hammer — and stand firmly behind the important message in this docuseries.”

Meanwhile, Vucekovich explained in a statement to People how the photo made its way into the docuseries. 

“When you are love-bombed, you receive multiple images in rapid succession. During my time with Armie, I received numerous messages including countless images and videos,” she said. “The bite mark shown was a photo sent by Armie within our archived text thread and over a year later, I believed it to have been a photo of me given that I have dozens of photos depicting his abuse on my body.”

Armie Hammer was at the center of a cannibalism scandal in early 2021.
Discovery+
Armie Hammer was dropped from projects over graphic messages he allegedly sent women.
Discovery+

Vucekovich previously spoke to Page Six about her gory romance with the actor, claiming Hammer told her he wanted “to break my rib and barbecue and eat it.”

After the release of the “House of Hammer” trailer, she posted to her Instagram story writing, “onwards and upwards is the only option.”

Hammer was hit with a string of allegations of sexual abuse after being at the center of a cannibalism scandal in early 2021. He was dropped by his agency, WME, and a number of projects over graphic messages he allegedly sent women telling them he wanted to eat their flesh during sexual encounters.

Courtney Vucekovich — one of Armie Hammer’s former partners — accused him of improper sexual behavior.
Discovery+

The LAPD is currently investigating Hammer over claims he “violently raped” an ex-girlfriend called Effie.

“House of Hammer” is currently streaming on Discovery+.

Read original article here

Why anal sex ‘taboos’ put ‘generation of women’ at risk: doctors

Anal sex isn’t the taboo sex act it used to be — especially among heterosexual women.

Indeed, the most recent statistics provided by the Centers for Disease Control and the National Center for Health Statistics showed that more than a third — 35% — of women aged 15 to 49 have tried anal sex with a male partner.

Those numbers, taken from a survey of more than 5,500 women between 2015 and 2019, are rising — perhaps by a lot, depending on who you ask. A similar survey of 880 “sexually active adults,” conducted by doctor-led butt health brand Future Method, showed that 70% of women have tried anal sex at least once.

In the spirit of a new age of sexual exploration and health awareness, a duo of surgical researchers published an editorial in the BMJ this week, urging more clinicians to talk to women about the potential risks of engaging in anal sex — particularly for those who feel pressured by their partners to do so.

“Clinicians may shy away from these discussions, influenced by society’s taboos,” wrote Tabitha Gana and Lesley Hunt, colorectal and consultant surgeons, respectively, with the UK’s National Health System. “By avoiding these discussions, we may be failing a generation of young women, who are unaware of the risks.”

Physicians and healthcare workers, especially those in primary care and family medicine, “have a duty to acknowledge changes in society around anal sex in young women, and to meet these changes with open neutral and non-judgemental conversations to ensure that all women have the information they need to make informed choices about sex,” the colleagues wrote.

Silence on the albeit sensitive subject, they continued, “exposes women to missed diagnoses, futile treatments, and further harm arising from a lack of medical advice.”

Gana and Hunt referred to a national survey of British women that outlined the top reasons why they’ve tried anal sex, including curiosity and personal pleasure. Unfortunately, for approximately a quarter of women, pressure from their male partners has played a significant role. The US is meanwhile expected to reflect similar trends.

“The pain and bleeding women report after anal sex is indicative of trauma, and risks may be increased if anal sex is coerced,” they wrote.

Anal sex can be safe and enjoyable for many, but the authors warned there are anatomical features to women that bring a different set of risks, such as incontinence, due to their “less robust” sphincter and weaker anal canal muscles compared to men. That’s one reason why women who engage in the act show increased rates of fecal incontinence and anal injury.

The surgeons point out that a majority of medical literature for patients pertaining to anal sex focuses on sexually transmitted illnesses, such as HIV, herpes and HPV — which can lead to certain cancers — but misses the aforementioned physiological risks, as well as the emotional toll of coercion.

In the absence of clinical guidance, women are looking to a “plethora of non-medical or pseudomedical websites to fill the health information void,” some of which “may increase societal pressure to try anal sex,” rather than helping women “make informed decisions,” the authors said.

“Hit television shows such as ‘Sex and the City‘ and ‘Fleabag’ may unwittingly add to the pressure, as they seem to normalize anal sex in heterosexual relationships or make it appear racy and daring,” they added.

Beyond shame or stigma, the doctors urge clinicians to overcome the fear of coming off as “judgmental” or even “homophobic” by raising these concerns with patients — insisting there are resources for them to learn how to approach the subject in a conscientious way.

“With better information, women who want anal sex would be able to protect themselves more effectively from possible harm, and those who agree to anal sex reluctantly to meet society’s expectations or please partners, may feel better empowered to say no,” Gana and Hunt conclude.

Read original article here

R. Kelly may face life in prison at sex-trafficking sentencing

Fallen R&B star R. Kelly could spend the rest of his life in prison when he is sentenced Wednesday on charges he sexually abused multiple women, young girls and boys.

Kelly, 55, is set to appear in Brooklyn federal court after he was found guilty in September on nine charges, including racketeering and violating the Mann Act, which bars the transportation across state lines of women and girls for an “immoral purpose.”

The hearing is set to start at 10:30 a.m. and several women, including some who testified at Kelly’s trial last year, are expected to speak in court.

Prosecutors have asked Judge Ann Donnelly for a sentence of more than 25 years for the “I Believe I Can Fly” singer, whose full name is Robert Kelly — saying in a sentencing memo that Kelly relied on his fame and money to “both carry and conceal his crimes.”

R. Kelly is set to be sentenced in Brooklyn federal court on sexual abuse chages.
Antonio Perez/Chicago Tribune via AP, Pool, File

“He continued his crimes and avoided punishment for them for almost 30 years and must now be held to account,” the US Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York said in a 31-page sentencing memo.

Prosecutors sought to portray Kelly during the trial as a predator with a pattern of abuse over decades who showed no remorse for what he had done.

Prosecutors have asked the judge to sentence Kelly to over 25 years in prison.
REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg

“Indeed, the defendant’s decades of crime appear to have been fueled by narcissism and a belief that his musical talent absolved him of any need to confirm his conduct — no matter how predatory, harmful, humiliating or abusive to other — to the structures of the law,” the memo said.

Jennifer Bonjean, an attorney who has also represented disgraced actor and comedian Bill Cosby, has asked for a sentence of less than 14 years.

The defense team tried to portray accusers who testified as scorned fans, and said Kelly shouldn’t get more time for abusing a victim referred to in court as “Jane” whose parents pushed for his help with her music career.

“The record shows that Jane’s parents directed Jane to lie to the defendant about her age and then encouraged her to seduce him,” Kelly’s attorneys said in a court memo.

There were some 45 witnesses called during the trial, with tearful testimony from victim Jerhonda Pace, who described a confrontation with an enraged Kelly, who she said smacked her and forced her to perform oral sex on him.

One witness testified to walking in on Kelly performing oral sex on singer Aaliyah when she would have been just 13 or 14 years old.

Witnesses in Kelly’s trial described details about his marriage to singer Aaliyah when she was just 15 years old.
LIFETIME

Witnesses described the scheme for Kelly to illegally marry Aaliyah in 1994, when she was just 15 and he was 27. Kelly allegedly feared the girl was pregnant and married her with the idea it would help him avoid charges for having sex with a minor, and bar her from testifying against him. A former member of Kelly’s entourage testified he bribed an official to get Aaliyah a fake idea showing she was 18 so the marriage could go forward.

Aaliyah died in a plane crash in 2001 at 22 years old.

Kelly is also facing charges in Minnesota and federal charges of pornography and obstruction in Illinois.

The Grammy winner didn’t testify in his own defense during his New York trial, but famously broke into hysterics during a 2019 CBS News interview with Gayle King and denied any wrongdoing. The interview came in the wake of the series “Surviving R. Kelly,” which documented a slew of the allegations against him.

He may choose to make a statement at his sentencing Wednesday.

With Post wires

Read original article here

WWE’s first female ref, who claimed Vince McMahon raped her in the 1980s, reveals new details

WWE’s first female referee who claimed she was raped by former chairman Vince McMahon in the 1980s revealed new details about the incident amid a slew of fresh allegations against the wrestling boss. 

Rita Chatterton, who became a licensed wrestling referee in New York in 1984, had previously accused McMahon of forcing himself on her in a limo in a 1992 interview with Geraldo Rivera.

Her allegations were corroborated by former pro wrestler Leonard Inzitari in a new report by New York Magazine — which also delved into what led up to the harrowing encounter nearly four decades ago.

“He promised me half-a-million dollars a year,” she told the outlet in the story out Monday, referring to the contract offer McMahon extended over the phone following her television debut with the then-WWF in January 1985.

McMahon, whose father started WWF, had called Chatterton to tell her he was “impressed” with her work and wanted her to go “full-time” but had a warning for her, she told New York Magazine.

Rita Chatterton’s claim that she was raped by former WWE chairman Vince McMahon has recently been corroborated by former professional wrestler Leonard Inzitari.
Rachman, Chad

“Keep yourself clean,” he said, according to Chatterton.

“I don’t wanna see you messing around with any of the wrestlers. You keep it professional.”

The wrestling mogul also told Chatterton she’d be on the cover of glossies like Women’s Day, Better Homes and Gardens and Time, so she quit her job as a delivery driver with Frito-Lay and began to pursue wrestling full-time. But the relationship soured when the young ref tried to follow up – and McMahon allegedly raped her in July 1986.

During her interview with New York Magazine, Chatterton refused to go into specifics but Inzitari, a longtime friend from the business, corroborated her story for the first time since the allegations were made.

“I remember it like it was yesterday,” Inzitari told the outlet.

“She was a wreck. She was shaking. She was crying.”

Inzitari, whose stage name was Mario Mancini, said soon after the incident, he found Chatterton standing by herself close to the wrestling ring and when she saw him, she burst into tears and told him she was in McMahon’s limo when he “took his penis out.” 

“He kinda forced my head down there, and I made it known I wasn’t interested in doing that,” Inzitari recalled Chatterton telling him. 

“Then, [McMahon] pulled me on top of him,” she told Inzitari and soon, “He was inside her.”

Chatterton told the outlet the attack happened after she asked McMahon to discuss her career and he told her to meet her at a diner after the show.

Later, while sitting at a “big round table” with about a dozen others, Chatterton brought up her career but McMahon told her to keep quiet, she told the outlet.

“[He] put his finger to his mouth, in a shhh sign,” she recalled.

“When I come out of the ladies’ room, McMahon’s standing there … and he says, ‘I don’t wanna talk to you about your career in front of all these people, because it’s none of their business.’”

He suggested the two go to another diner down the street but when she left the restaurant, McMahon said he was tired and asked to speak inside his limo.

“It’ll only take 10 minutes,” he allegedly said.

During her interview with Rivera, Chatterton claimed McMahon then unzipped his pants and orally raped her. 

“Vince continued to, you know, ‘If you want a half-a-million-dollar contract, you’re going to have to satisfy me, and this is the way things have to go,’” she said at the time.

“Vince grabbed my hand, kept trying to put my hand on him. I was scared. At the end, my wrist was all purple, black, and blue. Things just didn’t … He just … God, he just didn’t stop. This man just didn’t stop.”

Chatterton told Rivera that McMahon asked how her daughter planned to go to college and said “Of course, she doesn’t have to go to college.”

“I was forced into oral sex with Vince McMahon. When I couldn’t complete his desires, he got really angry, started ripping off my jeans, pulled me on top of him, and told me again that, if I wanted a half-a-million-dollar-a-year contract, that I had to satisfy him. He could make me or break me, and if I didn’t satisfy him, I was black-balled, that was it, I was done,” she told Rivera. 

Speaking to New York Magazine, Chatterton recalled what McMahon said once the attack was over.

“One of the things that sticks with me, and always will… was, after he got done doing his business, he looked at me and said, ‘Remember when I told you not to mess with any of the wrestlers? Well, you just did,’” she recalled.

Following the attack, Chatterton told New York Magazine she went to the diner’s restroom and “cried my heart out” before going home and taking a “five-hour shower.”

While she did contact a lawyer in hopes of holding McMahon accountable, she ultimately decided against it.

“It came down that it was my word against McMahon’s, because I took a shower and didn’t go to the hospital,” she said.

“I was scared … He was powerful. It was gonna be him over me.”

When Chatterton first told Rivera her story in 1992, WWE was already in the midst of numerous scandals and her claims were buried in the noise. Soon, she left wrestling altogether and became a youth counselor. 

Earlier this month, McMahon was accused of paying millions of dollars in hush money to a female employee he had an affair with, leading to his resignation from his role as CEO and chairman of WWE.

The fresh claims are what inspired Chatterton and Inzitari to speak out after so much time had passed. 

“I’m sure others will come forward. Because we’re not the only two. There’s not a doubt in my mind about that,” Chatterton told the outlet. 

“As far as wrestling goes, I guess I’m the first in a lot of things … As far as I know, I’m the first to come out with the whole issue of what a scumbag he is.”

Inzitari, who has avoided speaking negatively about McMahon in the past, agreed. 

“I’ll tell you why I’m hopping on the bandwagon now,” he said. 

“There’s worse stuff than that.”

WWE didn’t return a request for comment.

Read original article here

‘He Raped Me for Days,’ Alleged British Victim of Paul Haggis Told Cops

ROME—Police in the southern Italian city of Brindisi say the British woman who has accused Oscar-winning director Paul Haggis of brutal rape has injuries consistent with her allegations. “I was raped for days,” the woman told investigating prosecutor Antonio Negro, according to a summary of the arrest document relayed to The Daily Beast. “We were supposed to work together, but instead he raped me from Sunday evening to Wednesday.”

The woman, who Negro’s office says holds a British passport, was left last Wednesday before dawn by the director outside the Brindisi airport in the province of Puglia, which sits at the heel of Italy’s boot, according to her testimony to police. She says she did not have an airline ticket, but that he gave her money to buy one when the airport opened, according to the prosecutor’s office.

The prosecutor’s office says the woman was discovered cowering in a corner of the small airport by a flight attendant who immediately alerted authorities. “She was destroyed,” the attendant told police, according to the initial investigative document. “She spoke with difficulty.”

After an initial medical examination at the airport health clinic, she was taken to the hospital for treatment in line with Italy’s “pink protocol” for rape victims, which includes psychological counseling. The prosecutor’s office says she “suffered repeated non-consenting sexual assaults” including one so violent she was “forced to seek medical attention.”

That horrific event is apparently what led to the end of her ordeal, when she says Haggis drove her to the airport in the early hours of Wednesday. The medical examiner’s report says that she was left incapable of having sex from the violence.

The prosecutor’s office says that after she was left incapacitated, he drove her alone to the airport from the tourist town of Ostuni about an hour away where the 69-year-old—who has been accused of sexual misconduct by four other women—was headlining the Allora Fest with Oliver Stone, Matt Dillon, Edward Norton, and Marisa Tomei. The music and film festival immediately distanced themselves from Haggis, canceling all events he was scheduled to take part in.

Police then investigated the new allegations, surveying camera footage outside Haggis’ hotel room and the airport that reportedly proves she was with him. They then waited until the woman left Italy safely to arrest the director on Sunday in Ostuni. His family had by then joined him. He was held in custody in the provincial capital city of Brindisi overnight, but has been released under house arrest at a hotel in Ostuni awaiting the equivalent of an arraignment this week.

An attorney for Haggis, Priya Chaudhry, refused to comment on the case to The Hollywood Reporter, citing a non-existent “law” she says prohibits her from commenting on ongoing cases. “That said, I am confident that all allegations will be dismissed against Mr. Haggis,” Chaudhry said in an email to the outlet. “He is totally innocent, and willing to fully cooperate with the authorities so the truth comes out quickly.”

The director’s Italian lawyer, Michele Laforgia, has been speaking to local press entities and confirmed to The Daily Beast that his client’s first court date is scheduled for Thursday. He said he believes that Haggis is “completely innocent and we hope for the maximum speed of all the necessary investigations to clarify the matter.”

He added that until they are presented with details of the charges, “we cannot declare anything else, nor enter into the merits of the accusations.”

Haggis wrote two best picture Oscar films with Million Dollar Baby in 2014 and Crash in 2005. The latest incident is not the first time the Canadian director has been in legal trouble. An ongoing civil lawsuit accusing him of violence was filed against him by publicist Haleigh Breest in 2017. Three more women came forward a year later saying he had sexually abused them. He denies all accusations.

Haggis, who left the Church of Scientology in 2009, has claimed that the sex abuse allegations are simply retaliation by the church. His accusers deny that claim.

Read original article here

Bill Cosby civil trial jury must start deliberations over

SANTA MONICA, Calif. — After two days of deliberations in which they reached verdicts on nearly all of the questions put before them, jurors in a civil trial who were deciding on sexual abuse allegations against Bill Cosby will have to start from scratch on Monday.

By the end of the court day Friday, the Los Angeles County jury had come to agreement on whether Cosby had sexually assaulted plaintiff Judy Huth at the Playboy Mansion when she was 16 in 1975, and whether Huth deserved any damages. In all they had answered eight of nine questions on their verdict form, all but one that asked whether Cosby acted in a way that should require punitive damages.

Judge Craig Karlan, who had promised one juror when she agreed to serve that she could leave after Friday for a prior commitment, decided over the objections of Cosby’s attorneys to accept and read the verdict on the questions the jury had answered. But he had to change course when deputies at the Santa Monica Courthouse appeared and required him to clear the courtroom. The courthouse has a required closure time of 4:30 p.m. because of no budget for deputies’ overtime

Karlan refused to require the departing juror, who had been chosen as foreperson, to return on Monday, so jurors will have to begin again with an alternate in her place.

“I won’t go back on my word,” Karlan said.

It was a bizarre ending to a strange day of jury deliberations. It began with a note to the judge about what he called a “personality issue” between two of the jurors that was making their work difficult.

After calling them to the courtroom and getting them to agree that every juror would be heard in discussions, the jurors resumed, but had a steady flurry of questions on issues with their verdict form that the judge and attorneys had to discuss and answer. One question was on how to calculate damages.

After the lunch break, Cosby lawyer Jennifer Bonjean moved for a mistrial because of a photo taken by a member of Cosby’s team that showed a juror standing in close proximity to a Cosby accuser who had been sitting in the audience and watching the trial.

Karlan said the photo didn’t indicate any conversation had happened, and quickly dismissed the mistrial motion, getting assurances from the juror in question, then the entire jury, that no one had discussed the case with them.

The accuser, Los Angeles artist Lily Bernard, who has filed her own lawsuit against Cosby in New Jersey, denied speaking to any jurors.

“I never spoke to any juror, ever,” Bernard told the judge from her seat in the courtroom. “I would never do anything to jeopardize this case. I don’t even look at them.”

Karlan fought to get past the hurdles and have jurors deliberate as long as possible, and kept lawyers, reporters and court staff in the courtroom ready to bolt as soon as a verdict was read, but it was fruitless in the end.

Jurors had begun deliberating on Thursday morning after a two-week trial.

Cosby, 84, who was freed from prison when his Pennsylvania criminal conviction was thrown out nearly a year ago, did not attend. He denied any sexual contact with Huth in a clip from a 2015 video deposition shown to jurors. The denial has been repeated throughout the trial by his spokesman and his attorney.

In contentious closing arguments, Bonjean urged the jurors to look past the public allegations against Cosby and consider only the trial evidence, which she said did not come close to proving Huth’s case.

Huth’s attorney Nathan Goldberg told jurors Cosby had to be held accountable for the harm he had done to his client.

The Associated Press does not normally name people who say they have been sexually abused, unless they come forward publicly, as Huth and Bernard each have.

———

Follow AP Entertainment Writer Andrew Dalton on Twitter: https://twitter.com/andyjamesdalton



Read original article here

University of Michigan settling students’ sexual abuse lawsuit

The University of Michigan on Thursday reached a settlement agreement with students who demanded changes in the university’s handling of sexual assault on campus, according to a report by The Associated Press. 

In the university’s deal with the students in federal court, the school will create a multidisciplinary committee which will be designed to protect those on the University of Michigan campus from sexual assault and abuse, the AP notes.

The committee, called the Coordinated Community Response Team (CCRT), will be made up of 30 members that include experts on Title IX and campus sexual abuse, reports the AP. 

The committee will also include select faculty and administration members, as well as members of the community, the AP reports.

“I think, most importantly, [the committee] has representation from students and survivors,” said assistant professor of law at Wayne State University Nancy Cantalupo to the AP. “They will all have a seat at the table alongside the other experts that are on the CCRT.”

“And that will give them a direct line into the administration — and the upper levels of the administration — in terms of communicating their concerns and their needs,” Cantalupo added.

The University of Michigan was hit by allegations that came to light in 2020 from hundreds of men who alleged sexual assault by the deceased campus doctor, Robert Anderson, the outlet reports.

The school announced a $490 million settlement with those who accused Anderson, the AP reports.

Former University President Mark Schlissel was also removed from his position early this year, the AP notes, following the revelation of emails citing an inappropriate sexual relationship between him and a subordinate.



Read original article here

Retired pope asks pardon for abuse, but admits no wrongdoing

ROME — Retired Pope Benedict XVI asked forgiveness Tuesday for any “grievous faults” in his handling of clergy sex abuse cases, but denied any personal or specific wrongdoing after an independent report criticized his actions in four cases while he was archbishop of Munich, Germany.

Benedict’s lack of a personal apology or admission of guilt immediately riled sex abuse survivors, who said his response reflected the Catholic hierarchy’s “permanent” refusal to accept responsibility for the rape and sodomy of children by priests.

Benedict, 94, was responding to a Jan. 20 report from a German law firm that had been commissioned by the German Catholic Church to look into how cases of sexual abuse were handled in the Munich archdiocese between 1945 and 2019. Benedict, the former Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, headed the archdiocese from 1977 to 1982.

The report faulted Benedict’s handling of four cases during his time as archbishop, accusing him of misconduct for having failed to restrict the ministry of the four priests even after they had been convicted criminally. The report also faulted his predecessors and successors, estimating there had been at least 497 abuse victims over the decades and at least 235 suspected perpetrators.

The Vatican on Tuesday released a letter that Benedict wrote to respond to the allegations, alongside a more technical reply from his lawyers who had provided an initial 82-page response to the law firm about his nearly five-year tenure in Munich.

The conclusion of Benedict’s lawyers was resolute: “As an archbishop, Cardinal Ratzinger was not involved in any cover-up of acts of abuse,” they wrote. They criticized the report’s authors for misinterpreting their submission, and asserted that the authors provided no evidence that Benedict was aware of the criminal history of any of the four priests.

Benedict’s response was more nuanced and spiritual, though he went on at length to thank his legal team before even addressing the allegations or the victims of abuse.

“I have had great responsibilities in the Catholic Church,” the retired pope said in his letter. “All the greater is my pain for the abuses and the errors that occurred in those different places during the time of my mandate.”

Benedict issued what he called a “confession,” though he didn’t confess to any specific fault. He recalled that daily Mass begins with believers confessing their sins and asking forgiveness for their faults and even their “grievous faults.” Benedict noted that in his meetings with abuse victims while he was pope, “I have seen at firsthand the effects of a most grievous fault.

“And I have come to understand that we ourselves are drawn into this grievous fault whenever we neglect it or fail to confront it with the necessary decisiveness and responsibility, as too often happened and continues to happen,” he wrote. “As in those meetings, once again I can only express to all the victims of sexual abuse my profound shame, my deep sorrow and my heartfelt request for forgiveness.”

His response drew swift criticism from Eckiger Tisch, a group representing German clergy abuse survivors, who said it fit into the church’s “permanent relativizing on matters of abuse — wrongdoing and mistakes took place, but no one takes concrete responsibility,” the group said.

“Joseph Ratzinger can’t bring himself simply to state that he is sorry not to have done more to protect the children entrusted to his church,” the group said.

The response will likely complicate efforts by German bishops to try to re-establish credibility with the faithful, since their demands for accountability have only increased as the church has come to terms with decades of abuse and cover-up.

The head of the German bishops conference, Limburg Bishop Georg Baetzing, had previously said that Benedict needed to respond to the report by distancing himself from his lawyers and advisers. “He must talk, and he must override his advisers and essentially say the simple sentence: ’I incurred guilt, I made mistakes and I apologize to those affected,” Baetzing said.

In a tweet Tuesday, Baetzing noted that Benedict had responded.

”I am grateful to him for that and he deserves respect for it,” Baetzing wrote. The tweet didn’t address the substance of Benedict’s response.

The law firm report identified four cases in which Ratzinger was accused of misconduct in failing to act against abusers.

Two cases involved priests who offended while Ratzinger was archbishop and were punished by the German legal system but were kept in pastoral work without any limits on their ministry. A third case involved a cleric who was convicted by a court outside Germany but was put into service in Munich. The fourth case involved a convicted pedophile priest who was allowed to transfer to Munich in 1980, and was later put into ministry. In 1986, that priest received a suspended sentence for molesting a boy.

Benedict’s team had earlier clarified an initial “error” in their submission to the law firm that had insisted Ratzinger was not present at the 1980 meeting in which the priest’s transfer to Munich was discussed. Ratzinger was there, but his return to ministry was not discussed, they said.

Benedict said he was deeply hurt that the “oversight” about his presence at the 1980 meeting had been used to “cast doubt on my truthfulness, and even to label me a liar.” But he said he had been heartened by the support he had received, including from his successor.

“I am particularly grateful for the confidence, support and prayer that Pope Francis personally expressed to me,” he said.

The Vatican had already strongly defended Benedict’s record in the aftermath of the law firm report, recalling that Benedict was the first pope to meet with victims of abuse, that he had issued strong norms to punish priests who raped children and had directed the church to pursue a path of humility in seeking forgiveness for the crimes of its clerics.

The Vatican’s defense, however, focused primarily on Benedict’s tenure as head of the Holy See’s doctrine office and his eight-year papacy.

Benedict reflected on his legacy in his letter.

“Quite soon, I shall find myself before the final judge of my life,” he wrote. “Even though, as I look back on my long life, I can have great reason for fear and trembling, I am nonetheless of good cheer. For I trust firmly that the Lord is not only the just judge, but also the friend and brother who himself has already suffered for my shortcomings.”

Benedict’s response also rang hollow outside of Germany, with the U.S.-based survivor’s advocacy group, SNAP, accusing him of “repeating words of apology that have fallen on deaf ears for decades.”

And Mitchell Garabedian, the Boston attorney of “Spotlight” fame who has represented hundreds of abuse victims, said Benedict’s words re-victimized and insulted survivors.

“He’s a leader setting a poor example morally, and in the process he is encouraging further cover-up of clergy sexual abuse. The criminality continues,” he said.

———

AP reporters Geir Moulson in Berlin and Mark Pratt in Boston contributed.

Read original article here

Evan Rachel Wood Exposes Marilyn Manson’s Nazi House of Horrors in Sundance Doc ‘Phoenix Rising’

In director Amy Berg’s new documentary Phoenix Rising, Evan Rachel Wood holds Marilyn Manson accountable for the abuse she says she endured during their relationship, which began when she was 18 years old. But the actress and activist makes clear that she’s not exactly rejoicing about it.

“This isn’t about revenge, or, ‘He’s a monster and he needs to be punished and destroyed,’” she says in the documentary. “He’s already destroyed. That man is not a man anymore; he is gone.”

Part One of the documentary premiered Sunday at the Sundance Film Festival. The second installment is due on HBO later this year, but the first covers a lot of ground: Evan Rachel Wood’s upbringing, her rise as an actress and subsequent treatment by the industry as a mature “troubled teen” figure, and her alleged grooming and abuse at the hands of the then-37-year-old rock star—who she says terrorized her emotionally and sexually, threatened her life, and began getting swastikas and decorating their home with Nazi propaganda during their relationship despite knowing she is Jewish. Wood also alleges that Manson “essentially raped” her during a music video shoot for “Heart-Shaped Glasses.”

Manson, who is facing multiple civil lawsuits for sexual assault and is under investigation by the authorities, has denied the abuse claims against him and says his “intimate relationships have always been entirely consensual with like-minded partners.”

More important than any lurid details about Wood’s abuse, however, is the film’s study of what came next—the moment Wood felt safe enough to come forward about what had happened to her and subsequently began advocating to expand California’s statute of limitations for when domestic abuse survivors can press charges against their abusers to beyond three years.

Berg’s documentary unfolds through interviews with Wood, her family, and fellow activists—all brought to life alongside archival footage and Alice in Wonderland-like illustrations. Wood reads from a journal she kept for years starting at the age of 15. She recalls growing up feeling alone and invisible. “I didn’t know where to go,” she says, “so I was the perfect candidate for somebody to pop up and say, ‘Come with me.’”

Wood says she and Manson, born Brian Warner, met in 2006 at a Chateau Marmont party where at first she mistook him for a Manson wannabe. She recalls he recognized her from her work in Thirteen—then a cornerstone of the actress’ Lolita image in Hollywood. (“The industry machine… saw this image of maturity and ran with it,” Wood says. “But I was still so young.”)

Warner allegedly told Wood that he wanted to work with her on a film adaptation of Phantasmagoria and asked for her contact information, after which they began seeing one another—ostensibly to work on the project. It was at that point, Wood says, that the grooming began. Warner began to isolate her from her friends and family, she says; he egged on a rift between her and her boyfriend; cast aspersions on Wood’s mother by impugning on her conduct as Wood’s manager; and would eventually threaten to, in Wood’s words, “fuck up my whole family from the bottom up” starting with her father.

A striking feature of Berg’s work: Wood’s mother and brother both provide interviews in support of her story, testimony that proves devastating in its empathy. “He has studied this,” says Wood’s mother, Sara Lynn Moore. “He’s studied how to manipulate people. He’s a predator—he’s a predator.”

Wood recalls that her first kiss with Warner occurred when she was preparing to leave town. The two had been drinking absinthe and he told her he’d miss her. She couldn’t even finish her reply before he “stuck his tongue down my throat… Everything went white and I just didn’t know how to respond.” The two didn’t have intercourse then, she says, but “things definitely escalated on the roof. It ended with him on top of me and then it was over and I felt really weird and very icky. I wasn’t even really attracted to him.” She says it was the first time that she’d kissed an adult man in her personal life.

Wood recalls that Warner’s proclamations of love quickly became unnerving—missives like “quite the muse, you brat” and “you’re so important to me I want to kick you.” (Definitions for terms like “grooming” and “love bombing” appear on screen in moments like these.)

During their relationship, Warner also began to express a heightened interest in Nazism and mass psychology, Wood says—despite the fact she is Jewish. She recalls his insistence that Adolf Hitler was “the first rock star because Hitler was stylish, he was well spoken, and he knew how to manipulate the masses.” He was obsessed with Nazi paraphernalia and imagery, she says, and made fun of her when it made her upset. At one point, she recalls, the words “Kill All the Jews” hung over their bed. “At what point are you doing a commentary,” she wonders aloud, “and at what point are you just a Nazi?”

At what point are you doing a commentary, and at what point are you just a Nazi?

Wood also details how scarification and branding became a part of their bond when they carved initials into one another, in her case an “M” next to her vagina “to show him that I belonged to him.”

Perhaps the most gut-wrenching moment in Phoenix Rising comes when Wood and her mother address Warner’s “Heart-Shaped Glasses” music video. “I didn’t want her to do it,” Moore says. “Nobody wanted her to do it. But I think she felt like it was true romance—it was cool and it was edgy and she really… wanted to do it.”

Wood recalls that Warner railroaded her into multiple explicit scenarios the two had not previously discussed during the video shoot, which she describes as traumatizing. The two had discussed a simulated sex scene, she said, but once the cameras began rolling “he started penetrating me for real; I had never agreed to that… No one was looking after me.” It was the first time, she says, that Warner committed a crime against her—and it was “just the beginning of the violence that would keep escalating over the course of the relationship.”

Another harrowing incident allegedly occurred while Wood accompanied Warner on tour; he was high on Vicodin and grabbed her by the arm, dragging her into a hotel in front of his crew. As she watched Warner destroy their room, Wood says she silently pleaded with a crew member whom she’d worked with before not to leave them alone. “I remember him starting to slowly close the door,” she says. “That’s when I knew I wasn’t safe.”

As much responsibility as Phoenix Rising understandably places on Warner’s shoulders, the film also does not shy away from confronting the industry that enabled him. One of the most disturbing aspects of Wood’s revelations about Warner has always been the degree to which the singer appears to have told the public exactly who he was from the beginning. Berg includes archival footage of a talk show interview in which he detailed a disturbing video project called “Groupie” with Andy Dick, Jon Favreau, and Daryl Hannah—all of whom politely banter along.

But Berg’s film also strikes a more hopeful note: The day after the 2016 presidential election, Wood decided to come forward about her experience. In 2018, she testified for the Sexual Assault Survivors Bill of Rights—at which point she began hearing from other women who knew exactly who her abuser was even though she did not name him. Their stories sounded just like hers. “It was like finding out that you had dated a serial killer,” Wood says. Eventually, Wood and her fellow activists were able to raise the California statute of limitations to a maximum of five years—the first time in the state’s history that the window has been altered.

“It was the first time that I had felt really heard,” Wood says of the moment. “Not only did people hear our stories, but they said, ‘Yeah we hear you, and something does need to change.’”

Read original article here

Ex-Michigan Speaker Lee Chatfield’s sister-in-law accused him of sexual assault

The woman who accused former Michigan House Speaker Lee Chatfield of multiple sexual assaults since she was a teenager was revealed to be his own sister-in-law.

Rebekah Chatfield, who is married to the politician’s younger brother, claims the former speaker assaulted her “more times than I can count” beginning when she was 15 years old more than a decade ago.

Rebekah, now 26, filed the criminal complaint with the Lansing Police Department against Lee, 33, she said in several interviews with Bridge Michigan.

The assaults allegedly began when she dated the politician’s younger brother and continued until 2021, she told the outlet.

“He destroyed me, and has controlled my life since I was 15-16, the past 10-11 years,” she said. “And I know the only way to get justice for this is to come forward and to file a criminal (complaint) against him.”

Lee, a Republican, was the youngest person to serve as Speaker of the House in Michigan in over 100 years. He left office in 2020 due to term limits.

Rebekah claimed the assaults began when she was 15 or 16 years old at Northern Michigan Christian Academy, a private school in Burt Lake where Lee taught and coached soccer before he launched his political career. His father is pastor of the church, the school superintendent and a teacher.

She had reportedly been dating Lee’s younger brother, Aaron Chatfield. Rebekah and Aaron were pushed to marry when at 19, after their families discovered they were having sex, according to the report.

Rebekah and Aaron Chatfield were engaged in June 2014 and married two months later.
Facebook

Rebekah claimed she kept the incidents secret from her family and husband because she was ashamed and afraid to tell them. Her mental health reached a breaking point in December, when she finally shared her trauma with them and subsequently filed the police report, according to Bridge.

Rebekah would allegedly stay at Lee’s home often, and she said the touching began as unwanted gropes in the basement stairwell, eventually progressing to sexual intercourse, she told Bridge. She claimed the assaults continued “more times than I can count.

“I had a lot of family stuff going on in my life,” she told Bridge. “My dad was a recovering alcoholic, and so I believe that Lee used those (circumstances) against me and helped take advantage of me. So he would manipulate me, he would mess with my emotions.”

With trouble at home, she became more dependent on the Chatfield family, who “ran that whole church and school” that had become essential to her social life, she said.

“My whole world was the Chatfield family,” she said. “So if I told (the Chatfields), that would, that would ruin everything. I couldn’t see what would happen past then. I didn’t know there was an option to report. I didn’t know there were options for therapy.”

Aaron claimed to remember his older brother being handsy with his then-girlfriend when they were younger.

“I always had questions,” he told Bridge. “I don’t remember how I asked, I just remember saying, ‘Is something going on between you and Lee?’

“I just saw the way he looked at her.”

Lee Chatfield served as speaker of the Michigan House of Representatives from 2019 to 2021.
AP

Rebekah said Lee would find reasons to text her late at night, and enter the guest room and grope her. She said the sexual assaults when she stayed at Lee’s home became more frequent, eventually culminating in sex. Each time she would break up with Aaron, she said Lee would coax them back together.

The psychological abuse wore her down, she said, and she stopped resisting.

“When I was in my darkest place, I didn’t know what else to do, and he continued to remind me that I didn’t have, really, anyone else but him,” she said.

Rebekah’s mother, Debbie Newberry, claimed to have seen a change in her daughter’s behavior in her later teenage years as Lee allegedly began to groom her daughter. 

Rebekah and Aaron were engaged in June 2014 and married two months later, according to Bridge. Neither of the 19-year olds were prepared for marriage, and had second thoughts, the report said.

The night before the wedding, while Rebekah was crying inside of the Chatfield’s home, she alleged Lee offered to comfort her, before forcing her into a closet for a sex act.

“After he finished he said, ‘Don’t worry. I’ll talk to Aaron, you guys are getting married.’” Rebekah Chatfield told Bridge. “And he walked out.”

After Rebekah and Aaron were married, the affair allegedly continued while the two went off to separate colleges. She recalled one time where Lee allegedly visited with his wife and two children, “And during my husband’s soccer game,” she said, “he took me back to my house and assaulted me.”

Rebekah Chatfield claimed the assaults began when she was a teenager at a private school where Lee Chatfield taught and coached soccer.
Getty Images

Aaron quit school earlier to support his brother’s political career. He claimed to Bridge that he’d worked in Lansing as Lee’s driver and would take the rising politician to strip clubs and to meet with various women, including a former staffer.

“Lee portrays himself as a family tradition, conservative guy who believes in the Bible and the Bible is so important,” said Aaron, 26. “No, it couldn’t be further from who my man was as a person.”

On one occasion two years ago, Rebekah said she and Aaron were visiting Lee’s office when he asked Aaron to go pick up a pizza. Lee pressured her into unwanted sex in a separate room before his brother returned, she alleged.

Since Aaron learned about his brother’s years of assault on his wife in December, he has been supportive of his wife and is confident she is telling the truth, he alleged.

“I’m rethinking every conversation I ever had with Lee,” Aaron reportedly said.

The pain, he said,  “goes very deep,” calling his older brother “the person I looked up to most in the world.”

Lee’s father, Rusy Chatfield, who founded the church and school where his son taught told Bridge “the allegations are false.”

Paul Chatfield, another younger brother who also worked with Lee in politics, said he believes Lee engaged in “inappropriate behavior” with Rebekah but questions her timeline.

“What she is saying, I don’t believe,” Paul Chatfield said, adding that “the best-case scenario is, I’m disappointed” in his brother.

Rebekah acknowledged to the Bridge that at times it was she who initiated contact with Lee, but denied that it was consensual.

“…it was never consensual, because it started when I was a minor — the brainwashing, the mentality, the manipulation, the psychological, the emotional — he groomed me into being who he wanted me to be.”

Lee has not commented on the accusations, but his attorney Mary Chartier told The Bridge in a statement that both were “consenting adults” in the relationship.

“Their affair lasted for years, but they were both consenting adults,” she said. “Mr. Chatfield deeply regrets the decisions he has made. It has caused great pain to his wife and family, and they are working through this together. But he did not assault this woman in any manner during their years-long adult relationship. He intends to vigorously fight these false claims.”

Under Michigan law, the age of consent in 16, however it is illegal for teachers to have any type of penetrative sex with a student under the age of 18.

Read original article here