Tag Archives: Senior Level Management

Peloton Swaps Out Finance Chief as It Navigates Persistent Losses

Peloton Interactive Inc.

is exchanging its top finance executive about four months after it named a new chief executive, a move that comes as the fitness-equipment maker navigates persistent losses.

The New York-based at-home exercise equipment company on Monday said

Liz Coddington

will serve as its chief financial officer, effective June 13. Peloton said its current CFO,

Jill Woodworth,

decided to leave after more than four years with the company.

Peloton said Ms. Woodworth will remain with the company as a consultant on an interim basis to help prepare the fiscal year 2022 financial results.

Ms. Coddington most recently served as vice president of finance for Amazon Web Services, an

Amazon.com Inc.

subsidiary that provides on-demand cloud computing platforms. Before that, she held CFO and leadership finance roles at companies including retailer

Walmart Inc.

and streaming business

Netflix Inc.

Ms. Coddington joins Peloton as the company is dealing with waning demand from consumers after facing issues around its ability to meet orders, which soared during the early stages of the pandemic. The surge in demand for Peloton bikes led the company to break ground on a million-square-foot factory in Wood County, Ohio, last year.

Peloton is now looking to sell the factory that it will never use. The company also slashed prices for its equipment, projected slower growth and had to borrow $750 million to fund its operations.

Peloton in May reported its largest quarterly loss since the company went public in 2019, reporting a net loss of $757.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, compared with a loss of $8.6 million in the prior-year period.

In February, Peloton replaced Chief Executive

John Foley

with

Barry McCarthy,

who previously led the finances of digital music service

Spotify Technology SA

and Netflix. The company also cut 2,800 jobs amid reduced demand for its exercise equipment. Mr. Foley was closely associated with the company’s growth phase after its public offering and the revenue surge early in the pandemic.

The change in the CFO-seat makes sense given the continuing restructuring under Mr. McCarthy, said

Rohit Kulkarni,

managing director at equity trading and research firm MKM Partners LLC.

“As the new CEO puts his mark on the organization’s structure and aligns it with where he wants the company to go, these changes are not completely surprising,” he said.

With Peloton’s fiscal year ending June 30, Ms. Coddington will very quickly be “under a bigger investor microscope,” as the expectation is that the company will release fiscal year guidance soon after she joins, Mr. Kulkarni said. “It will be a challenging task to provide that new guidance.”

Write to Jennifer Williams-Alvarez at jennifer.williams-alvarez@wsj.com and Mark Maurer at Mark.Maurer@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Elon Musk Says His $44 Billion Twitter Deal Is ‘On Hold’

Elon Musk

said his planned acquisition of

Twitter Inc.

TWTR -9.67%

was “temporarily on hold” because of concerns about fake accounts, a surprise twist that jolted investors and raised questions about his willingness to go through with the $44 billion transaction.

Mr. Musk’s grenade came in a tweet posted at 5:44 a.m. Eastern Time that was followed just over two hours later by another saying he was “still committed to acquisition.” Lawyers close to Mr. Musk urged him to send that follow-up tweet, according to people familiar with the matter.

The initial announcement was unorthodox not just in its timing and format, but because Mr. Musk referenced a recent Twitter disclosure about fake and spam accounts that it has made consistently for years—and because Mr. Musk has already signed an agreement for the purchase and waived detailed due diligence on the deal.

The sudden shake-up fueled questions about whether Mr. Musk is committed to a deal that was struck amid a sharp decline in technology stocks that has made Twitter less valuable on paper than it was a month ago when he made his offer of $54.20 a share. Twitter shares, which were already trading well below that level, closed down 9.7% in afternoon trading at $40.70.

People in Twitter’s camp said Mr. Musk’s first tweet was a surprise and that he hadn’t reached out to the company ahead of time. But they played down its significance and said the second tweet, indicating that the deal is still on, is the one that matters. The company continues working to complete the acquisition and is supplying Mr. Musk with all the relevant information under the terms of the contract, according to a person familiar with Twitter’s response.

Twitter CEO

Parag Agrawal

on Friday said “while I expect the deal to close, we need to be prepared for all scenarios,” a day after he internally announced a hiring freeze and cost cuts.

Mr. Musk was aware of questions about fake and spam accounts on Twitter when he agreed to the acquisition—he has raised concerns about it in his own tweets for years. In Friday’s post on his verified Twitter account, he said: “Twitter deal temporarily on hold pending details supporting calculation that spam/fake accounts do indeed represent less than 5% of users.”

He linked to a May 2 report about a Twitter securities filing that said it estimates that false or spam accounts represented fewer than 5% of its daily active users. The company has reported the same figure in its annual reports since it went public in 2013.

It couldn’t be determined if the latest tweets were a negotiating tactic to abandon the transaction or reprice the deal.

The tweets come as many big tech stocks have been falling on Wall Street, including shares of Tesla, which retreated 29% since Mr. Musk’s investment in Twitter became public. Mr. Musk is using his Tesla holdings to help fund the Twitter deal. Meanwhile, Twitter’s stock price had traded below Mr. Musk’s offer price as investors wondered if the deal might get reworked or not get done.

Susannah Streeter,

an investment analyst at

Hargreaves Lansdown,

said there will be skepticism whether the fake accounts are the real reason for the delaying tactic. “The $44 billion price tag is huge, and it may be a strategy to row back on the amount he is prepared to pay to acquire the platform,” she said.

After Hindenburg Research LLC, an activist short seller, this week called the Twitter deal overpriced and said that there is “significant risk” it could get repriced lower, Mr. Musk tweeted in response: “Interesting. Don’t forget to look on the bright side of life sometimes!”

If the deal does fall apart, Mr. Musk could owe Twitter $1 billion depending on the reason for the breakup. The size of the breakup fees, at just over 2% of the deal value, is about average for similar transactions. Also called termination fees, the penalties are meant to deter parties from breaking agreements and address the expense and inconvenience of a failed deal.

Because Mr. Musk waived doing detailed due diligence on the deal, it could make it more difficult for him to back out over something like a discrepancy in the number of spam accounts. If he tries to, the company could attempt to force him to complete the deal under a legal protection called “specific performance,” though that maneuver is rarely successful in practice.

In 2020, luxury-goods conglomerate

LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE

tried to back out of a deal to buy Tiffany & Co. for $16.2 billion after the pandemic hurt demand for high-end jewelry. Tiffany sued to enforce the agreement and LVMH countersued, arguing the business had been so deeply damaged that their original agreement was no longer valid. The two sides later agreed to cut the price by a relatively modest $430 million and settle related litigation.

Mr. Musk’s initial tweet Friday could be seen as critical of Twitter, which could further complicate things. The merger agreement stipulates that he can tweet about the deal so long as he doesn’t disparage the company or any of its representatives.

Before Friday, Mr. Musk had appeared to be moving forward on the deal in meetings with Twitter and hadn’t attempted to restart negotiations, but he had started asking questions about the number of spam accounts on the platform, people familiar with the matter said. A Twitter spokesman said Mr. Musk had visited the company May 6 as part of the transaction-planning process.

Twitter has warned that its estimate of fake and spam accounts is based on a sampling of accounts and that “the actual number of false or spam accounts could be higher than we have estimated.”

Mr. Musk’s tweets Friday are the latest twist in the unorthodox attempt to take over the social-media giant by the world’s richest man. It began with Mr. Musk buying a large chunk of Twitter shares on the open market earlier this year as a passive investor, which soon turned into a full-fledged buyout offer, outlined in a four-paragraph letter and several text messages to Twitter’s chairman.

Elon Musk has cultivated close ties with Beijing to build Tesla’s business in China. Now that he is buying Twitter and focusing on free speech, WSJ looks at how China has used the social-media platform to promote its views, and why that’s raising concerns. Photo Illustration: Sharon Shi

The per-share offer price of $54.20 contained a veiled reference to marijuana. The latest bombshell comes on a superstitious date: Friday the 13th.

Truist Securities analyst

Youssef Squali

said he could see a scenario where Mr. Musk tries reducing the offer price by 15% to 20%, to $46 or $43 a share. “If he’s successful, then his ability to secure funding while lowering his reliance on Tesla shares increases pretty dramatically,” Mr. Squali said.

In addition to financing from Wall Street, Mr. Musk has had to sell at least $8.5 billion worth of Tesla shares to fund the deal. He has also assembled a cast of 19 investors, from a Saudi prince to Silicon Valley stalwarts, to put up another $7 billion.

Meanwhile, federal regulators are investigating Mr. Musk’s late disclosure last month of his sizable stake in Twitter, a lag that allowed him to buy more stock without alerting other shareholders to his ownership, The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday, citing people familiar with the matter.

Mr. Musk made his filing on April 4, at least 10 days after his stake surpassed the trigger point for disclosure. He hasn’t publicly explained why he didn’t file in a timely manner. An attorney for Mr. Musk didn’t respond to a message seeking comment.

Amid Mr. Musk’s takeover attempt, Twitter has been dealing with the disruptions in the digital advertising market from global economic turmoil and the war in Ukraine. The company said Thursday that it was pausing hiring and looking to cut costs and announced the departure of two senior executives.

“Effective this week, we are pausing most hiring and backfills, except for business critical roles,” Twitter’s Mr. Agrawal wrote in a memo, which was viewed by The Wall Street Journal. Twitter’s move adds to broader upheaval in the tech industry in recent weeks in which several companies have been cutting staff and spending or slowing hiring.

contributed to this article.

Write to Sarah E. Needleman at sarah.needleman@wsj.com and Cara Lombardo at cara.lombardo@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Elon Musk’s Twitter Funding Puts More of His Tesla Holdings at Risk

Tesla Inc.

Chief Executive

Elon Musk

has for years intertwined his personal business ventures with his stake in the auto maker. Using those holdings to help finance his $44 billion purchase of

Twitter Inc.

TWTR 0.97%

brings that connection to a deeper level.

A key part of the funding plan includes borrowing $12.5 billion from loans backed by more than $62.5 billion worth of Tesla shares that Mr. Musk owns—or about 40% of his stake at Wednesday’s closing price of $881.51. Tesla and several banks have put in place rules that would require him to put up more collateral if the company’s share prices fall.

The business tycoon has long built his personal financial house on a web of loans backed by his stakes in companies he backed.



Photo:

ryan lash/Agence France-Presse/Getty Images

Using Wednesday’s price, Mr. Musk would need to satisfy the banks with more collateral if Tesla shares were to fall 43% to around $504. In that case, the banks would require a rebalancing that would call for an additional $14 billion, or 28.5 million shares at that level. That’s on top of the 70.9 million shares needed at Wednesday’s price for the original collateral.

Similarly, Tesla has long capped the amount Mr. Musk is allowed to borrow against his shares at 25% of the total value of the pledged stock. This suggests that if the deal used Wednesday’s share price, he’d need to pony up more if those shares fell more than 20% to below $705 and Tesla enforces its policy. These arrangements mean that in certain scenarios, he could be pressured to sell Tesla shares.

Tesla didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Mr. Musk sold roughly $4 billion worth of Tesla stock in the two days after agreeing to buy Twitter, selling a total of more than 4.4 million shares on Tuesday and Wednesday at prices ranging from around $870 and $1,000 a share, according to regulatory filings made public late Thursday.

The overarching story of Tesla’s stock has been one of growth, rising more than 18,000% since going public in 2010. But, like Tuesday, when it fell 12% as investors digested, among other things, what Mr. Musk’s involvement in Twitter might mean for other parts of his empire, the stock has been highly volatile. The Tesla shares are down more 20% since April 4 after he balked at joining the Twitter board, setting him on a path to bidding for the company.

Tesla in 2021 became the world’s first auto maker valued at more than $1 trillion.



Photo:

Patrick Tehan/MediaNews Group/Bay Area News/Getty Images

Since 2010, positive and negative stock swings of 5% or more in a single day have totaled 318, according to FactSet data, including Tuesday when Tesla fell to $876.42 a share. In that same period,

Apple

has seen 57 similar days while

General Motors Co.

had 90.

At the end of 2021, Mr. Musk had 173 million Tesla shares, not counting his options. About half of his stake was already promised as collateral for personal loans, according to the most recent public record last year. Pledging doesn’t necessarily indicate that actual borrowing against those shares has occurred, the filing said. The most recent public filing in late 2020 said Mr. Musk personally owed a combined $515 million to

Morgan Stanley,

Goldman Sachs

and

Bank of America.

The business tycoon has long built his personal financial house on a complicated web of loans backed by his ownership stakes in the companies he backed, including his privately held rocket company, Space Exploration Technologies Corp.

Tesla has previously warned investors of the risk that a stock sale by Mr. Musk to cover loans could cause share prices to fall.

“If the price of our common stock were to decline substantially and Mr. Musk were unable to avoid a sale of the pledged shares (for example, by contributing additional collateral or reducing his leverage), Mr. Musk may be forced by one or more of the banking institutions to sell shares of our common stock,” the company wrote in a 2020 regulatory filing.

Along with competing for his attention, Tesla and SpaceX have over the years shared employees and resources—the Model S sedan prototype was developed under a tent inside SpaceX’s Hawthorne, Calif., headquarters.

In 2016, Mr. Musk led Tesla’s controversial acquisition of a struggling solar panel company called SolarCity Corp., where he was chairman and the largest individual shareholder. Opponents of the deal described it as a bailout for Mr. Musk, while he said it would fuel natural synergies. A Delaware judge ruled Wednesday that the deal was lawful.

Mr. Musk’s unusual finances are in part a legacy of the struggles Tesla and SpaceX faced during the Great Recession in 2008. He plowed what was left of his fortune from his involvement in

PayPal

into those ventures and was reluctant to sell his ownership stakes later as those businesses improved.

That history had left him a cash-poor billionaire for much of his career even while the Bloomberg Billionaires Index ranks him as the world’s richest man with a fortune of more than $250 billion.

To fund his life and investments, Mr. Musk has borrowed money against his shares in Tesla and SpaceX to avoid having to sell them, a common practice among some of the wealthiest Americans. Before Mr. Musk began selling billions of dollars of shares late last year to help cover taxes on his options that vested, the company reported in June that about half of the Tesla shares he held were being used as collateral for personal borrowing.

His finances have benefited by the fact that the valuations of Tesla and SpaceX have continued to grow, allowing him to borrow more with fewer shares down.

Elon Musk at a 2019 event at Tesla’s plant in Shanghai.



Photo:

Qilai Shen/Bloomberg News

But Tesla shares have fallen precipitously on occasion, often triggered by events or predictions tied to the company’s prospects for growth.

Shares fell 21% on Sept. 8, 2020, after Tesla failed to be included in the S&P 500 as expected. Later that autumn they rose 8.2% the day after it was announced that the company would be included in the benchmark gauge of U.S. equities.

In early 2019, a dark cloud descended over Tesla as shares fell 43% in May from the year’s start among concerns about the company’s outlook. Mr. Musk was struggling to export the Model 3 compact car to China and Europe and with efforts to lower the vehicle’s price in the U.S.

Once those challenges were addressed and Tesla opened its first China assembly plant, the stock would begin the run that took it to new heights as the world’s first auto maker valued at more than $1 trillion in 2021.

Twitter will become a private company if Elon Musk’s $44 billion takeover bid is approved. The move would allow Musk to make changes to the site. WSJ’s Dan Gallagher explains Musk’s proposed changes and the challenges he might face enacting them. Illustration: Jordan Kranse

During those times when Tesla shares have fallen dramatically, attention often focuses on the margin call price for Mr. Musk’s shares.

In May 2019, for example, some short sellers—those investors who benefit from a decline in share price—were pushing a theory on what the trigger price would be for a selloff as Mr. Musk moved to cover his position.

That didn’t happen, but his family has clearly felt that pressure before. In 2015, Tesla board member and Mr. Musk’s younger brother,

Kimbal Musk,

faced a possible margin call on shares of SolarCity which had fallen to half their value from the start of the year, according to court records. Under financial pressure, he sought a loan from his brother.

“You know that I don’t actually have any cash, right?” Mr. Musk responded, according to records released in litigation dealing with the acquisition. “I have to borrow.”

Write to Tim Higgins at Tim.Higgins@WSJ.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

GE Cuts Larry Culp’s 2022 Pay After Shareholder Protest

General Electric Co. said Chief Executive

Larry Culp

agreed to reduce his potential compensation by about $10 million this year, responding to shareholder concerns over changes that

GE’s

GE 0.88%

board made to executives’ pay packages in 2020.

In August 2020, the GE board revised Mr. Culp’s contract, extending it until 2024 and awarding him a special stock grant during the year that was valued at more than $100 million by the end of 2020. Asset managers called the awards poorly linked to the company’s performance, which they characterized as trailing that of GE’s peers.

Nearly 58% of GE shares were voted against the board’s compensation practices at last year’s annual meeting. It is rare for shareholders to withhold their support for such say-on-pay votes at major companies.

For 2022, Mr. Culp stands to receive a $5 million equity award, instead of the $15 million set out in his revised contract, if he and the company meet performance targets. Exceeding those targets or falling short would increase or reduce the award, respectively.

GE reduced Mr. Culp’s potential 2022 pay following discussions with most of its major shareholders last year, the company said in its annual proxy statement.

“There was shareholder concern around the timing, size and structure of the 2020 retention grant made as part of the extension,” GE said in its filing, along with shareholder support for Mr. Culp’s leadership. The company also said it doesn’t plan to make similar changes to its CEO’s pay in future years.

On Thursday, GE reported paying Mr. Culp $22.7 million for 2021, including a cash bonus of $4.2 million and salary of $2.5 million as well as a $15 million equity award. The equity award was made before the 2021 annual meeting, GE said in the filing.

His 2021 pay trailed the $73.2 million that GE reported paying him in 2020, but it roughly matched the $24.6 million paid in 2019, Mr. Culp’s first full year heading the company, securities filings show.

GE said in its proxy that the board would also limit its use of discretion when determining executive bonuses, after shareholders expressed concerns that GE used discretion in 2020 to award bonuses rather than pegging them to performance measures.

The company said Mr. Culp’s bonus for 2021 paid out at 112% of target, reflecting better-than-target free-cash-flow and margin-expansion figures, and worse-than-target revenue growth, as well as a penalty based on companywide safety metrics.

A GE spokeswoman said the company spoke with investors holding about half the company’s shares, and three-quarters of those held by institutional investors, after the failed say-on-pay vote.

Write to Theo Francis at theo.francis@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Appeared in the March 18, 2022, print edition as ‘GE Cuts CEO Pay After Shareholder Protest.’

Read original article here

A Global Hunt for Russian Oligarchs’ Yachts Has Begun

PARIS—French authorities blocked a yacht linked to

Igor Sechin,

the sanctioned chief executive of Russian oil producer

Rosneft,

from leaving port, as authorities around the world cast what they have promised would be a global dragnet of assets belonging to Russia’s oligarchs in response to Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine.

France had already apprehended a Russia-owned cargo ship, a rare at-sea interception made shortly after a first round of sanctions against several individuals, banks and other entities was unveiled. Since then, the U.S., the U.K. and the European Union have expanded their lists of sanctioned individuals, and have pledged to go after a group of ultrarich Russian businesspeople and officials who they accuse of benefiting from close ties to President

Vladimir Putin.

The U.S. Justice Department launched a new task force Wednesday to hunt down and seize the luxury real estate, private jets, yachts and other assets of sanctioned Russian oligarchs that officials say have been stashed around the globe. The task force is part of an international effort to raise the cost to the Kremlin and its supporters of pursuing the Ukraine invasion, officials said.

“To those bolstering the Russian regime through corruption and sanctions evasion: We will deprive you of safe haven and hold you accountable,” said Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco, whose office will run Task Force KleptoCapture.

France announced this week the creation of a similar task force to hunt down sanctioned Russian oligarchs and their families’ assets in the country. French Finance Minister

Bruno Le Maire

said the state was exploring ways not just to freeze assets but to seize them. “When we seize it, it means you lose the ownership of that apartment, that yacht, or that house,” Mr. Le Maire said, adding that the West was waging “all-out economic and financial war on Russia.”

In response,

Dmitry Medvedev,

deputy chair of the Security Council of Russia, tweeted: “Watch your tongue, gentlemen! And don’t forget that in human history, economic wars quite often turned into real ones.” Mr. Le Maire later said his use of the word “war” was inappropriate.

Mr. Sechin’s yacht represents an early trophy in the French effort. Mr. Sechin was sanctioned by the U.S. in 2014 after Russia annexed Crimea. He was more recently included on a list of rich and influential individuals the EU sanctioned.

Representatives for Mr. Sechin and Rosneft weren’t immediately available to comment. When Mr. Sechin was sanctioned in 2014 by the U.S., he said he considered the move an endorsement of his effectiveness at Rosneft.

Mr. Sechin was among a group of individuals sanctioned by the European Union.



Photo:

MAXIM SHEMETOV/REUTERS

The 280-foot Amore Vero, or “True Love” in Italian, was impounded overnight at a shipyard in La Ciotat, on France’s Mediterranean coast, French officials said. The yacht was undergoing repairs, but French authorities said it was making arrangements to sail urgently. French authorities said it belonged to a company majority owned by Mr. Sechin.

Delivered to its owner in 2013, the yacht was registered under the flag of the Cayman Islands. It arrived in La Ciotat on Jan. 3 and was due to remain there until April 1 for repairs, according to French authorities, who said the fact that the yacht was trying to leave French territorial waters prompted their action.

It wasn’t the first vessel France has stopped since sanctions rolled out after the invasion. France intercepted a Russia-bound cargo ship in the English Channel last weekend, saying the ship was subject to new EU sanctions. French authorities said they stopped the ship, a 400-foot commercial vessel named the Baltic Leader, en route to St. Petersburg, Russia, as part of a joint operation with American authorities.

The vessel, which was carrying vehicles, was named on the U.S. sanctions list for allegedly belonging to Promsvyazbank, a state-owned bank focusing on Russia’s defense sector. The bank is also on the EU sanctions list, and French officials said it owned the vessel. Representatives of the bank weren’t immediately available to comment.

France said it had worked with U.S. authorities.

The new U.S. team, which includes representatives from a number of federal law-enforcement agencies, will aim to enforce sweeping sanctions, export restrictions and other economic measures being levied as officials step up pressure on Russia to end its invasion of Ukraine. The U.S. and its European allies have been escalating sanctions against Russian elites, including Mr. Putin.

The Justice Department said the unit would seek to prosecute sanctions violators; target the use of cryptocurrency to evade sanctions; fight illegal efforts to undermine restrictions taken against Russian banks; and begin criminal cases or use civil forfeiture laws to seize property, including personal real estate, financial and commercial assets.

“We will leave no stone unturned in our efforts to investigate, arrest, and prosecute those whose criminal acts enable the Russian government to continue this unjust war,” Attorney General

Merrick Garland

said.

Write to Nick Kostov at Nick.Kostov@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Elon Musk gave 5 million Tesla shares to charity after teasing possible donation to fight world hunger

Tesla Inc. Chief Executive Elon Musk donated more than 5 million Tesla shares in November, days after the U.N. World Food Program outlined a plan to potentially use a $6 billion donation from the world’s richest man.

A filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission made public Monday showed the donation, but not the recipient. The Tesla
TSLA,
+1.83%
shares were transferred in batches between Nov. 19 and Nov. 29, as Musk was also selling Tesla stock in preparation for a large tax bill.

On Halloween, Musk promised on Twitter
TWTR,
-0.42%
that he would sell Tesla stock and donate $6 billion to the U.N. World Food Program if it “can describe on this Twitter thread exactly how $6B will solve world hunger.” The executive director of the program, David Beasley, responded with a proposal on Monday, Nov. 15, and Musk began transferring shares to a charity the following Friday.

World Food Program spokesman Steve Taravella declined to disclose any information when contacted Monday. An email to Tesla, which disbanded its public-relations team in 2020, was not returned.

“To respect the privacy of our supporters, WFP’s practice has always been to leave any disclosure of possible contributions up to donors themselves,” Taravella wrote in an email to MarketWatch.

Musk did not respond publicly to the proposal from WFP’s Beasley, who had been tagging Musk in tweets that sought financial support from famous billionaires. Musk instead spent the day that Beasley posted it lashing out at U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders about taxes, after the Vermont independent and former Democratic presidential candidate tweeted: “We must demand that the extremely wealthy pay their fair share. Period.”

At the time, Musk was selling millions of shares in preparation for a large tax bill, while also exercising options for shares at much lower prices. Even with the gifted shares disclosed in Monday’s filing, Musk has about 2 million more shares — 172.6 million in total — than he owned when he began selling the stock.

Beasley has continued to tweet at Musk since the donation in apparent attempts to work together, including a Nov. 20 tweet asking him to “shock us all. Just do it.” He last tweeted at Musk on Dec. 16, according to a Twitter search.

It’s also possible the donation went to Musk’s own philanthropic organization, the Musk Foundation, which he established in 2002 and held a bit less than $1 billion as of the end of June 2020, according to a federal filing. Billionaires tend to divert stock to their own foundations before donating to charitable causes from those organizations.

For example, another electric-vehicle executive, Fisker Inc.
FSR,
+0.78%
Chief Executive and Chairman Henrik Fisker, directed $4 million in stock to establish a foundation in the name of him and his wife and $1.9 million to a donor-advised fund. That move was also made public Monday afternoon in an SEC filing, though that EV company also issued a news release outlining where the money was going.

Musk in 2012 signed the Giving Pledge, a public promise to give away at least half of his wealth in his lifetime or when he dies. Compared with some of his wealthy peers, he has been relatively quiet about his philanthropy until last year. Musk announced a $100 million prize aimed at helping to solve climate change, and he made several other donations in 2021, including a $1 million contribution to a Texas food bank, Vox reported. Musk sometimes announces his philanthropic activities on Twitter, including a September message about a $50 million donation for children’s cancer research.

At Monday’s closing price of $875.76, the 5,044,000 Tesla shares would be worth roughly $4.42 billion; on Nov. 19, when Musk began the transactions, the total outlay would have been worth roughly $5.74 billion at the closing price.

MarketWatch staff writer Leslie Albrecht contributed to this report.



Read original article here

Peloton CEO John Foley to Step Down, Firm to Cut 2,800 Jobs

Peloton Interactive Inc.

PTON 20.93%

plans to replace its chief executive, cut costs and overhaul its board after a slowdown in demand caused the once-hot bike maker’s value to plummet.

Peloton co-founder

John Foley,

who has led the company for its entire 10-year existence, is stepping down as CEO and will become executive chairman, the company told The Wall Street Journal.

Barry McCarthy,

the former chief financial officer of

Spotify Technology SA

and

Netflix Inc.,

will become CEO and president and join Peloton’s board.

The New York company will also cut roughly 2,800 jobs, affecting 20% of its corporate positions, to help cope with the drop-off in demand and widening losses. The cuts won’t affect Peloton’s instructor roster or content.

A little over two weeks ago, activist investor Blackwells Capital LLC called for Peloton to fire Mr. Foley and explore a sale of the company, which the Journal has reported is attracting potential suitors including Amazon.com Inc.

Blackwells reiterated its call Tuesday, saying Mr. Foley should leave the company entirely rather than become executive chairman. The company also released a 65-page presentation in which it estimated a sale could value Peloton above $65 a share. Peloton shares closed Monday at $29.75.

“We are open to exploring any opportunity that could create value for Peloton shareholders,” Mr. Foley said in an interview prior to Blackwells’s Tuesday release. Mr. Foley, a former Barnes & Noble Inc. executive who co-founded Peloton 10 years ago last month, declined to comment further.

The naming of a new CEO could indicate that Peloton sees an independent future for itself, or at least doesn’t want to sell at the current depressed share price. Any deal would likely require Mr. Foley’s support, as he and other insiders have shares that gave them control of over 80% of Peloton’s voting power as of Sept. 30, according to a securities filing.

Former Spotify CFO Barry McCarthy said his strength is a deep understanding of content-driven subscription models.



Photo:

Michael Nagle/Bloomberg News

Once a pandemic darling as homebound customers ordered its exercise equipment and streamed its virtual classes and its valuation soared, Peloton’s fortunes have recently sagged, with its stock until recently trading below its September 2019 IPO price of $29 a share as lockdowns ease and gyms start to fill up again.

The company’s shares fell 2% in early Tuesday trading. The company confirmed news of the leadership changes and reported a second-quarter net loss of $439 million. Peloton also lowered its revenue forecast for its full fiscal year to a range of $3.7 billion to $3.8 billion, down from its prior range of $4.4 billion to $4.5 billion.

The company’s value has fallen from a high of around $50 billion roughly a year ago to around $8 billion last week, before its shares rose 21% Monday on news of potential suitors.

Peloton has said it was planning cost cuts and reviewing the size of its workforce and production levels. Investors have been awaiting details of its plans.

Messrs. Foley and McCarthy said that the company had long been planning to hire a new CEO and that Mr. McCarthy entered the picture in the past few weeks.

“I have always thought there has to be a better CEO for Peloton than me,” said Mr. Foley, 51. “Barry is more perfectly suited than anybody I could’ve imagined.”

Mr. McCarthy, who is in his late 60s and plans to move from California to New York, said his strength is a deep understanding of content-driven subscription models, while Mr. Foley’s is in product development and marketing.

“Together we can make a complete grown-up and build a really remarkable business,” Mr. McCarthy said. He has consulted for Peloton investor Technology Crossover Ventures, sits on the boards of Instacart Inc. and Spotify, and was CFO of the music-streaming service until early 2020.

Peloton is making other personnel changes:

William Lynch,

the company’s president, will step down from his executive role but remain on the board;

Erik Blachford,

a director since 2015, will leave the board; and two new directors will be added.

The new directors are

Angel Mendez,

who runs a private artificial-intelligence company focused on supply-chain management, and

Jonathan Mildenhall,

the former chief marketing officer of

Airbnb Inc.

and co-founder of branding company TwentyFirstCenturyBrand.

Peloton said it expects to cut roughly $800 million in annual costs and reduce capital expenditures by roughly $150 million this year. The company will wind down the development of its Peloton Output Park, the $400 million factory that it said in May it was building in Ohio, and reduce its delivery teams as well as the amount of warehouse space it owns and operates.

“Where the company got over its skis is it built out a cost structure as if Covid was the new normal,” Mr. McCarthy said.

Mr. Foley has said the company is acting to improve its profitability and would share details with earnings. The company reported preliminary second-quarter revenue of $1.14 billion and said it ended the period with 2.77 million subscribers.

Peloton’s Pandemic Rise and Fall

Write to Cara Lombardo at cara.lombardo@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Spotify CEO Apologizes to Employees for Joe Rogan, Says He Doesn’t Believe in ‘Silencing’ Him

Spotify Technology SA Chief Executive

Daniel Ek

apologized to employees for the way

Joe Rogan’s

use of a racial slur in previous podcast episodes has impacted them, saying the situation “leaves many of you feeling drained, frustrated and unheard.”

He said in a letter shared with The Wall Street Journal by a company spokesman that he has no plans to remove the star podcaster from the streaming platform and committed to spending $100 million on music and audio content from what he called historically marginalized groups.

“There are no words I can say to adequately convey how deeply sorry I am for the way ‘The Joe Rogan Experience’ controversy continues to impact each of you,” Mr. Ek said to Spotify staffers on Sunday, referring to Mr. Rogan’s podcast. “Not only are some of Joe Rogan’s comments incredibly hurtful, I want to make clear that they do not represent the values of this company.”

The Spotify executive’s comments doubled down on his statements last week that Spotify is an open platform despite its exclusive deal to distribute Mr. Rogan’s podcast and that excluding Mr. Rogan isn’t the right choice. Mr. Ek’s letter follows Spotify’s acknowledgment that it was delayed in addressing outcry sparked by rocker

Neil Young

over Mr. Rogan’s shows about the Covid-19 pandemic and vaccines.

Mr. Ek said in his letter that Mr. Rogan chose to remove some episodes from Spotify following discussions with the company and Mr. Rogan’s own reflections. Tracking site jremissing.com says 113 of Mr. Rogan’s episodes have been taken off Spotify since Friday.

Mr. Rogan apologized for the second time in a week on Saturday after a compilation video emerged showing how he and some of his guests used the N-word numerous times on his show. In a video on his Instagram account, Mr. Rogan said he offered “my sincere and humble apologies” for “the most regretful and shameful thing that I’ve ever had to talk about publicly.”

In an Instagram video post, Joe Rogan addressed the growing backlash against him and Spotify, which distributes Rogan’s podcast, stemming from accusations that his show spread false information about Covid-19 vaccines. Photo: USA Today Sports/Reuters

He said the clips were taken out of context and that they were based on 12 years of conversations. He added that they look “horrible, even to me.”

The influence Mr. Rogan’s show has and how much responsibility Spotify has for its content has generated significant attention in recent days. Several artists, including Mr. Young,

Joni Mitchell

and

Graham Nash

have said they want to remove their content from Spotify for what they deem is misinformation about the Covid-19 pandemic and vaccines spread by Mr. Rogan.

Singer-songwriter

India Arie

said she pulled her music from the platform because she opposed the language Mr. Rogan used around race and the amount of money he makes from Spotify. She shared the compilation video of Mr. Rogan using a racial slur in numerous instances on his show, which sparked the latest outcry.

“While I strongly condemn what Joe has said and I agree with his decision to remove past episodes from our platform, I realize some will want more. And I want to make one point very clear—I do not believe that silencing Joe is the answer,” Mr. Ek said. “We should have clear lines around content and take action when they are crossed, but canceling voices is a slippery slope. Looking at the issue more broadly, it’s critical thinking and open debate that powers real and necessary progress.”

Last week Spotify publicized its content policies and created advisories for pandemic-related shows that send listeners to an information hub about Covid-19.

In 2020, Spotify paid $100 million, according to people familiar with the deal, to host “The Joe Rogan Experience” exclusively on its platform. The podcast has been critical to Spotify’s growth and expansion beyond music streaming. Mr. Ek repeated in his letter to staffers that he wants the company to be the biggest audio platform in the world.

Spotify’s response comes as companies increasingly are being forced to address backlash stemming from content appearing on their platforms.

Netflix Inc.

late last year responded to the outcry over a

Dave Chappelle

stand-up special that some employees said was offensive to the transgender community.

At the time, Netflix Co-Chief Executive and Chief Content Officer

Ted Sarandos

issued a companywide email defending the special and saying the service wouldn’t pull it down. Mr. Sarandos said the company works hard to support creative freedom and this means “there will always be content on Netflix some people believe is harmful.” He also said he didn’t think the special incites hate or violence.

“The Joe Rogan Experience” is the No. 1 show in 93 markets, Spotify has said. In 2021, Mr. Rogan’s show was the most-listened-to podcast every month in more than 30 markets, including in the U.S., said a person familiar with the matter. Mr. Rogan’s listeners have grown by 75% from the time he joined Spotify’s platform in September 2020 to December 2021, the person said.

Mr. Ek said that having an open platform was a core value of Spotify and that disputes were inevitable. Still, he said, the company could do more to elevate creators from underrepresented communities and diverse backgrounds.

News Corp’s Dow Jones & Co., publisher of The Wall Street Journal, has a content partnership with Spotify’s Gimlet Media unit.

Spotify, Neil Young and Joe Rogan

Write to Steven Russolillo at steven.russolillo@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8



Read original article here