Tag Archives: selfserving

CAA’s Bryan Lourd Fires Back at Ari Emanuel: He’s “Erratic” and “Self-Serving” – Hollywood Reporter

  1. CAA’s Bryan Lourd Fires Back at Ari Emanuel: He’s “Erratic” and “Self-Serving” Hollywood Reporter
  2. Bryan Lourd Hits Back At Ari Emanuel, Calling Him “Erratic” & “Self-Serving” Over Harvey Weinstein Comments Deadline
  3. Bryan Lourd Talks SAG-AFTRA Strike, ‘Brand Alignment’ with Pinault and Ari Emanuel Diss Variety
  4. CAA CEO Bryan Lourd Disputed Ari Emanuel’s Allegations Over Harvey Weinstein Bloomberg
  5. Ari Emanuel Takes Aim At CAA Over Harvey Weinstein Handling, Teases Netflix Deals, Urges Actors, Studios To Strike Deal & Condemns Benjamin Netanyahu Deadline
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Bryan Lourd Hits Back At Ari Emanuel, Calling Him “Erratic” & “Self-Serving” Over Harvey Weinstein Comments – Deadline

  1. Bryan Lourd Hits Back At Ari Emanuel, Calling Him “Erratic” & “Self-Serving” Over Harvey Weinstein Comments Deadline
  2. CAA’s Bryan Lourd Fires Back at Ari Emanuel: He’s “Erratic” and “Self-Serving” Hollywood Reporter
  3. Bryan Lourd Talks SAG-AFTRA Strike, ‘Brand Alignment’ With Pinault and Ari Emanuel Diss Variety
  4. Ari Emanuel Takes Aim At CAA Over Harvey Weinstein Handling, Teases Netflix Deals, Urges Actors, Studios To Strike Deal & Condemns Benjamin Netanyahu Deadline
  5. CAA CEO Bryan Lourd Disputed Ari Emanuel’s Allegations Over Harvey Weinstein Bloomberg
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Former GOP aide on Speaker vote: ‘Self-serving’ Republicans would make ‘mockery’ of Congress

A former Republican aide to two past GOP House Speakers said in an op-ed published Monday that a “self-serving” move by a small group of Republicans to potentially deny House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) the Speakership would make a “mockery” of the institution of Congress. 

Brendan Buck, a communications consultant who previously worked for former Speakers John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), said in The New York Times op-ed that the “usual pageantry” and “fleeting” hope that the incoming Congress will be better than the last could be “immediately dashed” if the House fails to choose a Speaker on the first ballot. 

Buck said a “small band of Republican misfits” have pledged to vote against McCarthy for the Speakership, and only five Republican votes against him are needed to deny him the role. He said McCarthy should do “all within reason” to secure the votes he needs to win on the first ballot. 

“Otherwise, a self-serving power play by a small group of Republicans threatens to make a mockery of the institution and further cement the notion that the party is not prepared to lead,” Buck wrote. 

McCarthy needs to win a majority of the House members present and voting to become Speaker, but the GOP’s narrow majority in the body means he cannot afford more than four votes with all 222 GOP members are voting. 

A group of at least five Republicans have expressly said or strongly indicated they would not support McCarthy for Speaker, which would be enough to deny him victory at least on the first ballot. A larger number of Republicans have demanded McCarthy agree to certain rules to win their support.

McCarthy offered a series of concessions to his detractors in the House rules package proposed on Sunday, but it remains unclear if that will be enough to secure him the necessary support.

Buck noted that the last time the House did not choose a Speaker on the first ballot was a century ago and that it has happened only once since the Civil War. He said a failed vote would weaken McCarthy or whoever the next Speaker is. 

“But no matter who ultimately emerges as the top House Republican, the prolonged spectacle would leave the Republican majority hopelessly damaged from the start, along with the institution of the House itself,” he said. 

Buck said the House cannot conduct any other business until a Speaker is chosen, and the selection process can be time-consuming even when it goes smoothly. 

He said the House would allow members to make speeches in favor of a candidate if McCarthy does not win on the first ballot, which he said could “unleash a circus” in which GOP opponents to McCarthy question his fitness for the job on the floor. 

Buck also predicted that Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), who is mounting a bid against McCarthy, would not win the leadership role and instead another Republican would be elected if McCarthy fails.

“But the agitators’ objective isn’t to win the speakership for one of their own; it is to weaken Mr. McCarthy or whoever emerges as the next speaker of the House. The embarrassment indeed may be the point,” Buck wrote.

Read original article here

Obama blasted for ‘self-serving’ ‘revisionist’ Russia comments during conference on disinformation

Former President Obama was called out on Twitter Thursday for presenting what some called a “revisionist history” about his record with Russia. 

The former president was participating in the “Disinformation and the Erosion of Democracy” conference at the University of Chicago, where he told the audience and The Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg, that he had been encouraged by the global response to aid Ukraine after Russian President Vladimir Putin invaded the country in February. He also remarked that when he was president, he recalled having to “drag” U.S. allies to take action against Russia.

“I will say that, as someone who grappled with the incursion into Crimea and the eastern portions of Ukraine, I have been encouraged by the European reaction. Because, in 2014, I often had to drag them kicking and screaming to respond in ways that we would’ve wanted to see, from those of us who describe ourselves as Western democracies,” the former president said.

However, Obama’s portrayal of how his presidency was tough on Russia didn’t ring true to many people on Twitter, who criticized and mocked the president for his memory on the issue. 

Terrorism expert and International security professor at Northeastern University Max Abrahms blasted Obama’s answer as “self-serving revisionist history.”

“Watch Obama’s self-serving revisionist history of how his administration responded the last time Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014,” Abrahms wrote. 

Mark Hemingway, senior writer at RealClearInvestigations, mocked Obama, tweeting, “‘grappled’ = did nothing after spending years mocking anyone that thought Russia was threatening and still refused to arm Ukraine.”

Several users remembered Obama’s infamous 2012 presidential debate moment, where he mocked Republican nominee Mitt Romney for calling Russia our number one geopolitical foe. Obama said at the time, “the 1980s” called and they “want their foreign policy back.”

Stephen Miller, contributing editor to The Spectator, shared an image of Romney, laughing. 

“Anybody know if @JeffreyGoldberg asked Obama about his ‘the ‘80s called’ jab at Romney? Would be a good question at a conference about disinformation,” Free Beacon reporter Chuck Ross said.

Barack Obama meets Russian President Vladimir Putin in 2016.
Kremlin.ru

In a thread, popular conservative Twitter account AGHamilton29 said he remembered “this going a little differently.”

“Umm I definitely remember this going a little differently. What I remember is that after Russian separatists shot down a civilian airliner and Russia invaded a sovereign country, we just passed weak and targeted sanctions. All because Obama wanted Putin’s help [w] Iran deal,” he tweeted.

“And then Obama was publicly thanking Putin less than a year later for that deal. It was no wonder Putin assumed the international costs of another invasion of Ukraine would be relatively low,” he added.

At this same event, Obama also told how Putin had always been “ruthless” but “five years ago,” he wouldn’t have predicted Putin would’ve invaded Ukraine.

“For him to bet the farm in this way I’m not—I wouldn’t have necessarily predicted from him five years ago,” he said.

Paul Niland, a businessman who has resided in Ukraine for 20 years, noted that Russia invaded Ukraine 8 years ago when he was still president. 

Conservative author and columnist Derek Hunter highlighted the time Obama was caught on a hot mic telling Russian President Dmitry Medvedev in 2012, “I’ll have more flexibility” after the election. Medvedev responded by telling Obama he would relay his message to Putin. 

Even former Obama White House officials agree his administration was soft on Russia.

Obama’s former Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, admitted this week on CNN that his presidency should’ve been tougher on Russia in 2014 when they invaded and annexed Crimea. 



Read original article here