Tag Archives: Scientists

Scientists Discover ‘Ingredients For Life’ in 3.5 Billion-Year-Old Rocks in Australia

Researchers have discovered organic molecules trapped in incredibly ancient rock formations in Australia, revealing what they say is the first detailed evidence of early chemical ingredients that could have underpinned Earth’s primeval microbial life-forms.

 

The discovery, made in the 3.5-billion-year-old Dresser Formation of Western Australia’s Pilbara Craton, adds to a significant body of research pointing to ancient life in this part of the world – which represents one of only two pristine, exposed deposits of land on Earth dating back to the Archean Eon.

In recent years, the hydrothermal rock of the Dresser Formation has turned up repeated signals of what looks to be the earliest known life on land, with scientists discovering “definitive evidence” of microbial biosignatures dating back to 3.5 billion years ago.

Now, in a new study, researchers in Germany have identified traces of specific chemistry that could have enabled such primordial organisms to exist, finding biologically relevant organic molecules contained inside barite deposits, a mineral formed through various processes, including hydrothermal phenomena.

“In the field, the barites are directly associated with fossilised microbial mats, and they smell like rotten eggs when freshly scratched,” explains geobiologist Helge Mißbach from the University of Cologne in Germany.

“Thus, we suspected that they contained organic material that might have served as nutrients for early microbial life.”

Barite rock from the Dresser Formation. (Helge Mißbach)

While scientists have long hypothesised about how organic molecules could act as substrates for primeval microbes and their metabolic processes, direct evidence has to date proven largely elusive.

To investigate, Mißbach and fellow researchers examined inclusions within barites from the Dresser Formation, with the chemically stable mineral capable of preserving fluids and gases inside the rock for billions of years.

 

Using a range of techniques to analyse the barite samples – including gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, microthermometry, and stable isotope analysis, the researchers found what they describe as an “intriguing diversity of organic molecules with known or inferred metabolic relevance”.

Among these were the organic compounds acetic acid and methanethiol, in addition to numerous gases, including hydrogen sulfide, that could have had biotic or abiotic origins.

(Mißbach et al., Nature Communications, 2021)

Above: The Barite rock, indicating close association to stromatolites.

While it may be impossible to be sure of the precise links, the close proximity of these inclusions within the barite rock and adjacent organic accretions called stromatolites suggests that the ancient chemicals, once carried inside hydrothermal fluids, may have influenced primeval microbial communities.

“Indeed, many compounds discovered in the barite-hosted fluid inclusions … would have provided ideal substrates for the sulfur-based and methanogenic microbes previously proposed as players in the Dresser environment,” the researchers write in their study.

In addition to chemicals that may have acted as nutrients or substrates, other compounds found within the inclusions may have served as ‘building blocks’ for various carbon-based chemical reactions – processes that could have kickstarted microbial metabolism, by producing energy sources, such as lipids, that could be broken down by life-forms.

“In other words, essential ingredients of methyl thioacetate, a proposed critical agent in the emergence of life, were available in the Dresser environments,” the team explains.

“They might have conveyed the building blocks for chemoautotrophic carbon fixation and, thus, anabolic uptake of carbon into biomass.”

The findings are reported in Nature Communications.

 

Read original article here

Scientists Have New Theory for What Killed the Dinosaurs

American researchers have a new theory about how an object struck the Earth and caused the dinosaurs to die off.

Scientists mostly agree on where the impact happened about 65 million years ago. They say a huge object struck an area off the coast of what is now Mexico. Astronomers have said the most likely cause of the strike was either an asteroid or a comet.

In recent years, researchers have presented evidence that the impact was caused by an asteroid. The theory suggests the asteroid came from an area between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter.

Artist’s creation of the event involving an asteroid impact that scientists believe happened on Earth 65 million years ago. (Credit: NASA/Don Davis)

But a study by two astronomers from Harvard University presents a new theory: that the crash was caused by a comet. The researchers say the comet came from an area containing icy debris on the edge of the solar system. The area is known as the Oort cloud.

Their theory states that the comet was pulled into the solar system by Jupiter’s gravity. The comet then came very close to the sun, whose tidal force caused it to break up into pieces. The researchers believe one of the pieces crashed into the place that scientists have identified in Mexico.

The team based its theory on a model created to predict the probability that a long-period comet from the Oort cloud would hit Earth. Long-period comets take more than 200 years to orbit the Sun.

Because comets come from frozen areas of the outer solar system, they are icier than asteroids. They are known for leaving long trails of gas and dust as they melt.

The comet Neowise or C/2020 F3 is seen behind an Orthodox church over the Turets, Belarus, 110 kilometers (69 miles) west of capital Minsk, early Tuesday, July 14, 2020. (AP Photo/Sergei Grits)

The new study was recently published in Scientific Reports. The lead author was Amir Siraj, an astrophysics student at Harvard. “Jupiter is so important because it’s the most massive planet in our solar system,” he told the French press agency AFP.

Siraj said the findings showed that Jupiter’s large influence pushes “these incoming long-period comets into orbits that bring them very close to the sun.” The comets experience such a large tidal force from the sun “that the most massive of them would shatter into about a thousand fragments,” he said. Each of those fragments would be large enough to produce a crater the size of the Mexican site, he added.

That massive impact is estimated to have been equal to the strength of about 10 billion nuclear bombs. The U.S. Space Agency NASA has estimated the strike created a huge crater about 180 kilometers wide and 900 meters deep.

An artist’s interpretation is shown of the asteroid impact that scientists believe caused the extinction of the dinosaurs. (Credit: NASA/Don Davis)

The event is believed to have caused widespread wildfires, earthquakes and ocean waves. It also released chemicals into the atmosphere, leading to severe cooling. Scientists blame the event for destroying more than 70 percent of plant and animal life. In addition, all dinosaurs that were not bird-like died out.

The researchers say their theory can be tested by further studying the crater in Mexico, as well as possibly those on the moon. In addition, space explorers might also be sent to collect comet material for examination.

The study also suggests that similar impacts can be expected to strike Earth about once every 250 to 730 million years. But the other lead researcher on the project, Harvard professor Avi Loeb, noted that that is just an estimate.

“You never know when the next one will come,” he said. “The best way to find out is to search the sky.”

I’m Bryan Lynn.

Bryan Lynn wrote this story for Learning English, based on reports from Agence France-Presse and The Harvard Gazette. Mario Ritter, Jr. was the editor.

We want to hear from you. Write to us in the Comments section, and visit our Facebook page.

Quiz – Scientists Have New Theory for What Killed the Dinosaurs


Start the Quiz to find out

________________________________________________________________

Words in This Story

impact n. an act or event in which something strikes another thing

asteroid n. a space rock, that can be small or the size of a large moon, that orbits the sun

cometn. an outer space object that is made of material like gas and ice which is left behind in its orbit as it approaches the sun

debrisn. pieces that are left after something comes apart

tidal forcen. a secondary force of gravity involving two objects

shatterv. to suddenly break into many pieces

fragmentn. a broken piece of something that was once larger

cratern. a round hole made by an explosive force such as a bomb or an object falling from the sky

Read original article here

Real-life “Inception”: Scientists have figured out how to enter your dreams

The tornado was clearly visible to my friends and I, but we didn’t care. In fact, as we drove to the center of town, we didn’t even feel any wind. My friend in the driver’s seat pushed down hard on the gas pedal and we plowed straight through the funnel, a mild breeze whooshing past our faces as we did so.

Something seemed off. “Wait a minute, this is ridiculous,” I said to them. “We just drove right through a tornado. There is no way this is real. I’m obviously dreaming.”

I was experiencing what scientists call a lucid dream, or one in which the person sleeping is aware of the fact that they are not awake. It’s a state that is well-known to psychology and sleep scientists; for generations, many have studied the art of intentionally inducing this state so that they can fly or cultivate other imaginative experiences. Curiously, lucid dreaming may also be the key to communicating with the awake: a new study reveals that it is possible to communicate with someone while they are dreaming, although the catch is that it has to be a lucid dream. The study’s premise is reminiscent of the blockbuster sci-fi movie “Inception,” in which dream mercenaries are paid to enter others’ dreams and manipulate them while unconscious.

The paper, which was co-authored by a team of researchers and published in the journal Current Biology, involved a quartet of independent teams in the Netherlands, France, Germany and the United States. Between the four of them they studied 36 volunteers who either had experienced lucid dreaming or could recall at least one dream that they had had within the week prior to the experiment. They then trained the recruits on how to communicate with researchers while they were lucid dreaming; techniques ranged from the researchers using lights and tapping their fingers, to the dreamers moving their eyes in predetermined patterns. Scientists then held dozens of sessions in which they used electronic devices to confirm when participants were sleeping. Once they were asleep, the researchers tried to communicate with them by asking simple math or yes-or-no questions.

On 15 separate occasions, six sleeping individuals indicated to researchers that they were lucid dreaming. Between them they were asked 158 questions. 

“Across all teams, we observed a correct response on 18.4% of these trials; the independent experts unanimously scored the polysomnographic evidence as indicating REM sleep for 26 of these 29 trials,” the authors write. “On a further 17.7% of the trials, expert raters did not agree on deciphering the response (and on 9 of those trials two raters thought there was no response). An incorrect response was produced on 3.2% of the trials. The most common outcome was a lack of a response (60.1% of the trials).”

Salon interviewed Dr. Ken A. Paller, a psychology professor at Northwestern University and co-author of the study, about its larger implications.

“Our repeated demonstrations of successful interactive dreaming now provide a new way to gain knowledge about dreams,” Paller told Salon by email. “This new method has advantages over the retrospective reports people give after waking up, particularly because communication is while an individual is in the midst of a dream, rather than later when the individual has transitioned to the waking state and their recollection of the dream is less reliable.”

Paller explained that the research could help scientists better understand why we dream and how “sleep cognition” helps people. He ticked off possible explanations for dreaming including “maintaining memory storage, for using our memories creatively, for problem solving, and even for general well-being.”

“A second set of implications is for applying the methods as a function of people’s specific needs,” Paller added. “Applications could be developed for problem solving, practicing well-honed skills, spiritual development, nightmare therapy, and strategies for other psychological benefits.”

Paller told Salon that the researchers also managed to develop ways to help people have lucid dreams.

“We call our method Targeted Lucidity Reactivation, and it involves 20 minutes of training prior to sleep and an unobtrusive sound presented later, during REM sleep,” Paller explained, using the acronym for “rapid eye movement” sleep that is associated with dreaming. “We are continuing to work on improving these procedures, and we are also exploring possibilities for running experiments in people’s own homes. There may be some advantages to doing so, as people will not be bothered by the unusual environment of a sleep laboratory or the monitoring technology we use.”

“We have developed a smartphone app that we are testing out for this purpose,” Paller added.

Read original article here

Scientists revisit the 1st black hole they ever discovered and realize it’s bigger than they thought

New evidence suggests the first known black hole is bigger than previously thought, which may force scientists to reconsider their understanding of how giant stars give rise to black holes.

Scientists think stellar-mass black holes, which contain up to a few times the sun’s mass, form when giant stars die and collapse in on themselves. The first black hole ever discovered was Cygnus X-1, located within the Milky Way in the constellation of Cygnus, the Swan. Astronomers saw the first signs of the black hole in 1964 via gas it sucked away from a closely orbiting blue supergiant star. As this gas spiraled into the black hole, it became so hot it emitted high-energy X-rays and gamma-rays that satellites could detect.

A trio of studies in 2011 suggested Cygnus X-1 was located about 6,070 light-years from Earth, but the new research suggests the black hole is actually about 7,240 light-years away. Because other characteristics of the object are calculated based on distance, the new calculation argues that Cygnus X-1 is quite a bit larger than scientists had realized. 

Related: What happens at the center of a black hole?

An artist’s depiction of the Cygnus X-1 black hole and its companion star. (Image credit: International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research)

Space.com Collection: $26.99 at Magazines Direct

Get ready to explore the wonders of our incredible universe! The “Space.com Collection” is packed with amazing astronomy, incredible discoveries and the latest missions from space agencies around the world. From distant galaxies to the planets, moons and asteroids of our own solar system, you’ll discover a wealth of facts about the cosmos, and learn about the new technologies, telescopes and rockets in development that will reveal even more of its secrets. View Deal

To estimate the black hole’s distance, scientists use the so-called parallax technique, which examines Cygnus X-1 compared to its background. “If you hold a finger at arm’s length and close one eye and then the other, you will see it [your finger] appear to move from one spot to another in comparison with more distant background objects,” James Miller-Jones, an astrophysicist at the Curtin University node of the International Center for Radio Astronomy Research in Perth, Australia, lead author on the new study and co-author on some of the 2011 research, told Space.com. “Using that same idea, one can calculate how far away Cygnus X-1 was by looking at it from different vantage points as Earth moved around the sun.”

The 2011 work analyzed the light from the black hole’s companion star to help estimate the star’s diameter. With this measurement, researchers calculated other details of the partnership, such as the black hole’s mass, suggesting it was about 14.8 times that of the sun.

However, the 2011 research did not collect data from the black hole throughout a full orbit around its companion star. Without that information, the prior work could not fully account for how these orbital motions might affect the distance and mass estimates.

In the new study, Miller-Jones and his colleagues analyzed observations of Cygnus X-1 from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a giant radio telescope made of 10 dishes scattered across the U.S. Over the course of six 12-hour-long observations carried out on consecutive days, the researchers monitored the full orbit of the black hole.

Using the parallax technique on this new data combined with the 2011 data, the scientists found the black hole may be farther away that previously thought, about 7,240 light-years from Earth. 

These new findings led the researchers to revise what models of the motions of Cygnus X-1’s companion star, which in turn led to a new estimated mass for the black hole — about 21.2 times that of the sun. This size makes Cygnus X-1 the largest stellar-mass black hole detected to date with observations of light. (Gravitational-wave observatories such as LIGO that detect ripples in the fabric of space and time have detected larger stellar-mass black holes, including one about 50 times the sun’s mass.)

These findings suggest that the stars that form stellar-mass black holes may not lose as much material via winds as previously thought. “The mass of a black hole is set by how massive a star it started off as,” Miller-Jones said. “Stars lose mass as winds blowing off their surface, and massive stars generate more powerful winds. The most massive stars can have very powerful winds, and lose a lot of mass through them before they form black holes.”

The newfound giant size of Cygnus X-1 therefore suggests the stars that form stellar-mass black holes can be larger than previously thought. “Previous models predicted the most massive black hole a massive star in our Milky Way galaxy should be able to make should only be about 15 times the mass of the sun,” Miller-Jones said. “So finding something 21 times the mass of the sun means we have to revise our estimates of how much mass these massive stars are losing.”

The updated estimates of the black hole’s mass and distance also helped revealed the object is spinning very close to the speed of light, “faster than any other black hole found to date,” study co-author Xueshan Zhao at the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing, said in a statement.

And even larger stellar-mass black holes may be waiting for scientists’ attention. “Cygnus X-1 is unlikely the most massive stellar-mass black hole that can be produced,” Miller-Jones said. “The question is can we identify them, and how accurately can we measure their masses?”

The scientists detailed their findings online Feb. 18 in the journal Science. Two other papers focusing on different aspects of this work also appeared Feb. 18 in The Astrophysical Journal.

Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom and on Facebook.

Read original article here

Scientists Found a Way to Communicate With People Who Are Asleep And Dreaming

Scientists have identified a new phenomenon they describe as “interactive dreaming”, where people experiencing deep sleep and lucid dreams are able to follow instructions, answer simple yes-or-no questions, and even solve basic mathematics problems.

 

As well as adding a whole new level of understanding to what happens to our brains when we’re dreaming, the new study could eventually teach us how to train our dreams – to help us towards a particular goal, for example, or to treat a particular mental health problem.

There’s plenty about the psychology of sleep that remains a mystery, including the rapid eye movement (REM) stage where dreams usually occur. Being able to get responses from sleepers in real time, rather than relying on reports afterwards, could be hugely useful.

“We found that individuals in REM sleep can interact with an experimenter and engage in real-time communication,” says psychologist Ken Paller from Northwestern University. “We also showed that dreamers are capable of comprehending questions, engaging in working-memory operations, and producing answers.

“Most people might predict that this would not be possible – that people would either wake up when asked a question or fail to answer, and certainly not comprehend a question without misconstruing it.”

The researchers worked with 36 individuals in experiments across four different laboratories. One volunteer had narcolepsy and frequently experienced lucid dreams, while the others varied in terms of their experience with lucid dreaming.

 

During the deepest stages of sleep, as monitored by electroencephalogram (EEG) instruments, scientists interacted with the study participants through spoken audio, flashing lights, and physical touch: the sleepers were asked to answer simple maths questions, to count light flashes or physical touches, and to respond to basic yes or no questions (like “can you speak Spanish?”).

Answers were given through eye movements or facial muscle movements agreed in advance. Across 57 sleep sessions, at least one correct response to a query was observed in 47 percent of the sessions where lucid dreaming was confirmed by the participant.

Confirmation of the lucid dreaming states was done in a blinded fashion, with sleeper responses needing to be agreed upon by several witnesses.

A summary of the experiments. (Konkoly et al., Current Biology 2021)

“We put the results together because we felt that the combination of results from four different labs using different approaches most convincingly attests to the reality of this phenomenon of two-way communication,” says neuroscientist Karen Konkoly from Northwestern University.

“In this way, we see that different means can be used to communicate.”

 

The individuals involved in the study were usually woken up after a successful response in order to get them to report on their dreams. In some cases, the external inputs were remembered as being outside or overlaid on the dream; in others, they came through something inside the dream (like a radio).

In the published study the researchers compare trying to communicate with lucid dreamers to trying to get in touch with an astronaut in space, and it’s the immediacy of the responses that make this new approach so exciting.

The research could be helpful in the future study of dreams, memory, and how important sleep is for fixing memories in place. It might also come in useful in the treatment of sleeping disorders, and further down the line might even give us a way to train what we see in our dreams.

“These repeated observations of interactive dreaming, documented by four independent laboratory groups, demonstrate that phenomenological and cognitive characteristics of dreaming can be interrogated in real time,” write the researchers in their paper.

“This relatively unexplored communication channel can enable a variety of practical applications and a new strategy for the empirical exploration of dreams.”

The research has been published in Current Biology.

 

Read original article here

Scientists Make Unexpected Find Deep Under Antarctic Ice


(Newser)

Researchers working in Antarctica have made an unexpected discovery: colonies of stationary animals—likely sponges and related creatures—attached to a boulder deep beneath the ice, NBC reports. Geologists boring through the 3,000-foot-thick ice of the Filchner-Ronne Ice Shelf to take sediment samples from the ocean floor ran into the rock and sent down a camera. “It was a genuine surprise to see these animals there,” Huw Griffiths, a marine biologist and lead author of the new study documenting the find, told CNN. “It’s amazing,” he said, speaking to NBC, “because no one has ever seen these before.” In the past, small mobile creatures—things like fish, worms, jellyfish, and crustaceans—have been found far beneath the ice, the Guardian notes. But stationary filter-feeders have not.

Many scientist thought that was because of the hostile environment created by total darkness, a dearth of food sources, and frigid temperatures. Sponges and other filter feeders survive by feeding on floating material from plants and animals. The boulder hosting the animals is about 150 miles from the open sea. Based on the currents, the food they ingest may come from more than 900 miles away, the researchers say. “It was a real shock to find them there, a really good shock, but we can’t do DNA tests, we can’t work out what they’ve been eating, or how old they are. We don’t even know if they are new species, but they’re definitely living in a place where we wouldn’t expect them to be living,” Griffiths told the Guardian. (Read more Antarctica stories.)

var FBAPI = '119343999649';

window.fbAsyncInit = function() { FB.init({ appId: FBAPI, status: true, cookie: true, xfbml: true, oauth: true, authResponse: true, version: 'v2.5' });

FB.Event.subscribe('edge.create', function (response) { AnalyticsCustomEvent('Facebook', 'Like', 'P'); }); };

// Load the SDK asynchronously (function (d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));



Read original article here

Why some scientists think a comet, not an asteroid, caused the dinosaurs to go extinct

One day 66 million years ago, Earth suddenly transformed from being a verdant, dinosaur-ridden world to a soot-covered apocalyptic hellscape. The extinction event wiped out 75 percent of the world’s animal and plant species at the time, including dinosaurs.

Evidence of that calamitous day can be found in the Chicxulub crater, a heavily eroded 90-mile wide impact site located on Mexico’s Yucatán Peninsula, which is widely believed to be the impact site for whatever triggered the mass extinction event. And while there is scientific consensus that something hit the Earth that fateful day, there are different theories about exactly what

Indeed, for decades, geologists and geophysicists have fixated on the idea that an asteroid is to blame. Now, astrophysicists at Harvard University are theorizing that an icy comet from the Oort cloud — a theoretical shell of icy debris at the edge of the solar system— flew too close to the sun, in part due to Jupiter’s strong tidal forces, and eventually broke apart and crashed into Earth. In other words, “cometary shrapnel” from a long-period comet which pinged around our solar system could have caused the impact that led to a mass extinction, rather than an astroid.

Amir Siraj, lead researcher and undergraduate in astrophysics at Harvard University, and Avi Loeb, who is the former chair of astronomy at Harvard University, landed on this theory using statistical analysis and gravitational simulations. Their findings were published in Nature’s Scientific Reports on February 15.

In the paper, the researchers put forth their new calculations that increase by a factor of 10 the likelihood of long-period comets — meaning those which have orbital periods longer than 200 years — striking Earth. They also calculate that 20 percent of long-period comets become sungrazers, meaning comets that fly very close to the Sun and are whipped back through the terrestrial planets. The timing of these calculations would be “consistent with the age of the Chicxulub impact crater,” the researchers explained, providing a “satisfactory explanation for the origin of the impactor.”

Siraj told Salon he didn’t originally seek out to find the answer to the origins of the Chicxulub impactor, but he started to probe deeper while looking into the asteroid impact rates for Earth-like exoplanets. This led him to study cometary impact rates on those systems, which led to him creating numerical simulations to calculate long-period comets in our own solar system.

“What I ended up finding most striking was that a significant fraction of Earth-crossing comet —  Earth-crossing meaning comets 1 AU [astronomical unit] of the sun — were directly preceded by remarkably close encounters with the Sun,” Siraj said. “I found that these comets were passing so close to the Sun that they were within the Roche limit, where you can get tidal disruptions, and I dug into this point further, and what I ended up finding is that these comets were being produced by and large by interactions with Jupiter, which was essentially acting like a pinball machine.”

A common theory on the origin of the Chicxulub crater suggests that the source originated from the main belt, an area between the orbit of Jupiter and Mars populated with asteroids. The researchers say their theory provides a more realistic basis that can eventually be proved.

“Our paper provides a basis for explaining the occurrence of this event,” Loeb said in a media statement. “We are suggesting that, in fact, if you break up an object as it comes close to the sun, it could give rise to the appropriate event rate and also the kind of impact that killed the dinosaurs.”

Previously, evidence from the Chicxulub crater suggested the impact object was made of carbonaceous chondrite.

“Data in the past decade or so, and even before that, show that this composition is quite rare amongst asteroids,” Siraj said. “And we have a fairly good sense of the distribution of asteroid compositions simply as a result of having meteorites, which primarily come from asteroids.”

Yet comets, he noted, are not as well understood. Yet we know from one successful sample-return comet mission that comets do contain carbonaceous chondrite, Siraj said.

Siraj and Loeb aren’t the only ones positing the theory that a comet killed the dinosaurs. Two geoscientists advanced the theory in 2013, partially because the levels of iridium and osmium around the impact site were lower than should appear in an asteroid and more apt for a comet impact. Siraj said studying iridium will be an “important active area of research” to better understand what impactor that caused the Chicxulub crater.

Let’s say scientists eventually prove that a comet led to the extinction of dinosaurs and completely transformed Earth. Will that change how we perceive asteroids (or comets) as a threat to life on Earth?

“Asteroids are still the major short-term risk,” Siraj said. He noted that the good news about their theory is that there’s a low probability that shrapnel from a long-period comet will hit Earth in our lifetime. “We don’t have to worry about cometary impact being extremely common on very short timescales . . . however, it does change the way we think about longer term, like a million years and more — I imagine our civilization will have to have to reckon with these questions of deflecting small asteroids, which is very different from deflecting big asteroids, which is also very different from deflecting comets.”

Humanity’s need to make “contingency plans” to address planet-wide devastation events highlights the importance of future research around the dynamics of small bodies in our solar system.

“Science is really the tool that we can use to address these looming existential threats and be prepared,” Siraj said.

Read original article here

Harvard scientists have a new take on what wiped out the dinosaurs

Artist’s illustration of a comet bound for Earth.


Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

Harvard’s most controversial astronomer has a new theory about the space rock that took out the dinosaurs. There’s reason to believe it came from farther afield than previously assumed, he says. 

Avi Loeb has been making waves for a few years now by arguing that first ever interstellar object Oumuamua could be a wayward piece of alien technology from far beyond our solar system. But his latest paper has nothing to do with that.

Loeb and Harvard University astrophysics undergraduate student Amir Siraj suggest in a new study published Monday in Scientific Reports that the Chicxulub Impactor, which ended the rule of the thunder lizards, originated from the edge of our own solar system.

A popular theory about the demise of the dinos says the impactor likely originated from the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter, but Loeb and Siraj use statistical analysis and gravitational simulations to calculate that more Earth impactors actually originated from the far-off Oort cloud where most long-period comets hail from.

The pair’s calculations suggest some such comets can get knocked off track on their journey toward the inner solar system, with potentially catastrophic consequences.

“The solar system acts as a kind of pinball machine,” Siraj explained in a statement. “Jupiter, the most massive planet, kicks incoming long-period comets into orbits that bring them very close to the sun.”

So-called sungrazer comets can then be torn apart by the pull of the sun’s gravity.

“And crucially, on the journey back to the Oort cloud, there’s an enhanced probability that one of these fragments hit the Earth,” Siraj said. 


Now playing:
Watch this:

Q&A with Harvard’s Avi Loeb on our alleged extraterrestrial…



5:01

The research finds that the odds of such an impact are significantly higher than previously thought and that the new rate of impact lines up with the age of the Chicxulub impact crater in the Gulf of Mexico. A comet fragment from the Oort cloud also matches up with the unusual makeup of the impactor better than an asteroid from closer to home.

Even more important than solving the mystery of what killed off the dinosaurs, Loeb says a deeper understanding of natural traffic from deep space could also be important if a potential impactor should threaten our planet in the future.

“It must have been an amazing sight,” he said, “but we don’t want to see that again.”  

Follow CNET’s 2021 Space Calendar to stay up to date with all the latest space news this year. You can even add it to your own Google Calendar.  

Read original article here

Scientists Call on C.D.C. to Set Air Standards for Workplaces, Now

Nearly a year after scientists showed that the coronavirus can be inhaled in tiny droplets called aerosols that linger indoors in stagnant air, more than a dozen experts are calling on the Biden administration to take immediate action to limit airborne transmission of the virus in high-risk settings like meatpacking plants and prisons.

The 13 experts — including several who advised President Biden during the transition — urged the administration to mandate a combination of masks and environmental measures, like better ventilation, to blunt the risks in various workplaces.

On Friday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued new guidelines for reopening schools, but quickly passed over improved ventilation as a precaution. It was only in July that the World Health Organization conceded that the virus can linger in the air in crowded indoor spaces, after 239 experts publicly called on the organization to do so.

In a letter to the administration, scientists detailed evidence supporting airborne transmission of the virus. It has become even more urgent for the administration to take action now, the experts said, because of the slow vaccine rollout, the threat of more contagious variants of the virus already circulating in the United States, and the high rate of Covid-19 infections and deaths, despite a recent drop in cases.

“It’s time to stop pussyfooting around the fact that the virus is transmitted mostly through the air,” said Linsey Marr, an expert on aerosols at Virginia Tech.

“If we properly acknowledge this, and get the right recommendations and guidance into place, this is our chance to end the pandemic in the next six months,” she added. “If we don’t do this, it could very well drag on.”

The letter was delivered on Monday to Jeffrey D. Zients, coordinator of the Biden administration’s Covid-19 response; Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

The letter urged the C.D.C. to recommend the use of high-quality masks, such as N95 respirators, to protect workers at high risk of infection. At present, health care workers mostly rely on surgical masks, which are not as effective against aerosol transmission of the virus.

Many workers vulnerable to infection are people of color, who have borne the brunt of the epidemic in the United States, the experts noted.

Mr. Biden has directed the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, which sets workplace requirements, to issue emergency temporary standards for Covid-19, including those regarding ventilation and masks, by March 15.

But OSHA will only mandate standards that are supported by guidance from the C.D.C., said David Michaels, an epidemiologist at George Washington University and one of the signatories.

(Dr. Michaels led OSHA during the Obama administration; the agency has not had a permanent leader since his departure.)

“Until the C.D.C. makes some changes, OSHA will have difficulty changing the recommendations it puts up because there’s an understanding the government has to be consistent,” Dr. Michaels said. “And C.D.C. has always been seen as the lead agency for infectious disease.”

Public health agencies, including the W.H.O., have been slow to acknowledge the importance of aerosols in spreading the coronavirus. It was only in October that the C.D.C. recognized that the virus can sometimes be airborne, after a puzzling sequence of events in which a description of how the virus spreads appeared on the agency’s website, then vanished, then resurfaced two weeks later.

But the agency’s recommendations on workplace accommodations did not reflect this change.

Early in the pandemic, the C.D.C. said health care workers did not need N95 respirators, and could even wear bandannas to protect themselves. It also did not recommend face coverings for the rest of the population.

The agency has since revised those recommendations. It recently recommended that people wear two masks or improve the fit of their surgical masks to protect from the virus.

“But they don’t talk about why you need a better fitting mask,” said Dr. Donald Milton, an aerosol expert at the University of Maryland. “They’re acknowledging the importance of breathing it in and the route of transmission, and yet they don’t say it clearly in their various web pages.”

The agency recommends surgical masks for health care workers and says N95 respirators are needed only during medical procedures that generate aerosols, like certain kinds of surgery.

But many studies have shown that health care workers who have no direct contact with Covid-19 patients are also at high risk of infection and should be wearing high-quality respirators, said Dr. Céline Gounder, an infectious disease specialist at Bellevue Hospital Center in New York and an adviser to Mr. Biden during the transition.

“The C.D.C. has not emphasized the risk of aerosol transmission enough,” Dr. Gounder said. “Unfortunately, concerns about supply continue to muddy the discussion.”

Many hospitals still expect their staff to reuse N95 masks per the agency’s recommendation to reuse when supplies are low. But since the masks are no longer in short supply, the agency should change its recommendations, Dr. Gounder said.

“We really do need to stop this reuse and decontamination approach to N95s,” she added. “We’re a year into this, and that’s really not acceptable.”

Hospitals, at least, tend to have good ventilation so health care workers are protected in other ways, the experts said. But in meatpacking plants, prisons, buses or grocery stores, where workers are exposed to the virus for long periods of time, the C.D.C. does not recommend high-quality respirators, nor does it endorse upgrades to ventilation.

“If you go to other workplaces, this idea that aerosol transmission is important is virtually unknown,” Dr. Michaels said. In food processing plants, for example, a refrigerated environment and the lack of fresh air are ideal conditions for the virus to thrive. But the industry has not put in safety measures to minimize the risk, he added.

Employers instead hew to the C.D.C.’s recommendations for physical distancing and cleaning surfaces.

The recent emergence of more contagious variants makes it urgent for the C.D.C. to address airborne transmission of the virus, said Dr. Marr of Virginia Tech. Germany, Austria and France now mandate N95 respirators or other high-quality masks in public transportation and shops.

Dr. Marr was one of the experts who wrote to the W.H.O. last summer to push for an acknowledgment of airborne transmission. She did not expect to be in a similar position again so many months later, she said: “It feels like Groundhog Day.”

Read original article here

The massive planet scientists can’t find

One example is the aptly-named process of “spaghettification”, which is often illustrated by the fable of an astronaut who ventured too near a black hole’s event horizon – the point beyond which no light can escape – and fell in headfirst. Though her head and feet were just metres from each other, the difference in the gravitational forces acting on them would be so great, she would be stretched like spaghetti.

Intriguingly, the effect should be even more dramatic, the smaller the black hole is. Sholtz explains that it’s all about relative distances – if you’re two metres tall, and you’re falling through an event horizon that’s one metre from a primordial black hole’s centre, the discrepancy between the location of your head and feet is larger, compared to the size of the black hole. This means you’ll be stretched far more than if you fell into a stellar one that’s a million miles across.

“And so, peculiarly enough, they’re more interesting,” says Scholtz. Spaghettification has already been seen via a telescope, when a star got too close to a stellar black hole 215 million light years from Earth, and was ripped apart (no astronauts were harmed). But if there is a primordial black hole in our own solar system, it would provide astrophysicists with the opportunity to study this behaviour – and many others – up close.  

So what does Batygin make of the possibility that the long-sought ninth planet could actually be a black hole instead? “It’s a creative idea, and we cannot constrain what its composition is even in the least bit,” he says. “I think maybe it’s just my own bias, being a planetary science professor, but planets are a little bit more common…”

While Unwin and Scholtz are rooting for a primeval black hole to experiment with, Batygin is just as keen for a giant planet – citing the fact that the most common type throughout the galaxy are those which have around the same mass as Planet Nine.

“Meanwhile most exoplanets that orbit Sun-like stars, are in this weird range of being bigger than the Earth and considerably smaller than Neptune and Uranus,” he says. If scientists do find the missing planet, it will be the closest they can get to a window into those elsewhere in the galaxy.

Only time will tell if the latest quest will be more successful than Lowell’s. But Batygin is confident that their missions are totally different. “All of the proposals are quite distinct in both the data they seem they seek to explain, as well as the mechanisms they use to explain it,” he says.

Either way, the search for the legendary ninth planet has already helped to transform our understanding of the solar system. Who knows what else we’ll find before the hunt comes to an end. 

Zaria Gorvett is a senior journalist for BBC Future and tweets @ZariaGorvett

Join one million Future fans by liking us on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter or Instagram.

If you liked this story, sign up for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter, called “The Essential List”. A handpicked selection of stories from BBC FutureCultureWorklife, and Travel, delivered to your inbox every Friday.



Read original article here