Tag Archives: Scientific research on the International Space Station

NASA Details Plan to Retire, Crash ISS Into the Ocean

A view of the ISS at night.
Photo: NASA

The end of the International Space Station is finally approaching, with NASA declaring the retirement of the orbital outpost in 2030 and a dramatic deorbiting early in the following year.

Nothing lasts forever, not even the International Space Station. The writing’s been on the wall for some time now, but NASA made it official earlier this week, announcing that ISS operations will last until 2030 but no further. Upon retirement, the space station will perform a controlled re-entry and crash onto a remote part of the Pacific ocean known as Point Nemo. It’s all part of NASA’s plan to hand over space station responsibilities to the private sector and save a whole lotta cash in the process.

“The private sector is technically and financially capable of developing and operating commercial low-Earth orbit destinations, with NASA’s assistance,” Phil McAlister, director of commercial space at NASA, said in the statement. “We look forward to sharing our lessons learned and operations experience with the private sector to help them develop safe, reliable, and cost-effective destinations in space.”

In a detailed transition report sent to Congress, NASA said it expects to save $1.3 billion the year after ISS is gone and $1.8 billion per year by 2033. The space agency plans to spend these estimated savings on deep space exploration projects, allowing it to “explore further and faster into deep space,” according to the report. But by extending the mission to 2030, NASA will “continue another productive decade of research advancement and enable a seamless transition of capabilities in low-Earth orbit to one or more commercially owned and operated destinations in the late 2020s.”

In an email, Jonathan McDowell, an astronomer from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, cautioned that the new report didn’t include claims that other ISS partners, such as Russia, will agree to sustain ISS until 2030, “so it could be sooner,” he explained. Fair point. Russia, it would appear, has already checked out, as evidenced by threats of leaving and the deteriorating state of its ISS assets.

ISS has been in orbit since 2000, hosting a continuous succession of astronauts throughout its 22-year history. It’s the largest orbital outpost ever built—a stunning collaboration involving 15 different countries. Late last year, the Biden administration quietly extended the station’s lifetime from 2024 to 2030, but as the new report points out, this mission extension represents the last.

In its plan, NASA describes the decommissioning process, including a potential strategy to detach some modules and attach them to other space stations. At some point in 2030, the final crew will have to depart the ISS, in what will be undoubtedly an emotional and historic moment.

In early 2031, and with no one onboard, controllers will use thrusters to lower the station’s altitude to just above Earth’s atmosphere. The ISS will then make its fatal plunge through the atmosphere, followed by bits of debris splashing down onto the South Pacific Oceanic Uninhabited Area (SPOUA) in the vicinity of Point Nemo. This spot carries the nickname “spacecraft cemetery,” as it’s where space agencies have plopped hundreds of space pieces, including Russia’s Mir space station, for the past 50 years. Point Nemo is nowhere near inhabited areas, the closest being 1,670 miles (2,690 km) away.

Sounds simple, but the required degree of precision will require some extra work. The challenge is that ISS isn’t equipped with a big enough engine to allow direct travel from its current position to its required final low orbit in a single burn, as McDowell explained. ISS operators will have to “lower its orbit in stages before the final burn,” he said. “But you can’t lower it too far or the drag (winds) will make you lose attitude control and the station will start to tumble because of the forces.” The station will have to be lowered far enough before making the final burn, requiring the use of two Russian Progress spacecraft to lower the orbit and “then a third one to dump it,” McDowell said.

Indeed, and as NASA explains in its report, the station will “accomplish the de-orbit maneuvers by using the propulsion capabilities of the ISS and its visiting vehicles,” namely Progress and possibly Cygnus spacecraft. Then, “after performing maneuvers to line up the final target ground track and debris footprint” above SPOUA, ISS operators “will perform the ISS re-entry burn, providing the final push to lower ISS as much as possible and ensure safe atmospheric entry,” according to the report.

With the end of the ISS firmly in sight, NASA will be turning to the private sector to maintain a continuous human presence in space. To that end, NASA has already allocated $415.6 million as part of its Commercial Low Earth Destinations program, with the funds being distributed to Blue Origin, Nanoracks, and Northrop Grumman. There is concern, however, that space stations built by these firms won’t be ready in time and that a gap will exist by the time ISS is retired a mere eight years from now.

This situation could get worse if, as McDowell warned, other ISS partners won’t commit to the 2030 extension. Russia, like China, has plans to build its own space station in the coming years. It seems we’re at the end of an era. Fair to say, an international collaboration like this won’t happen any time soon.

More: Rollout of NASA’s New Megarocket Delayed Until at Least March.

Read original article here

NASA Plans To De-orbit The ISS By 2031 So Here’s How To Take It

Image: Jason Torchinsky

NASA has revealed their timeline for what they see as the lifespan of the International Space Station (ISS), which commits to operating the station until 2030, and then de-orbiting it into the Pacific ocean in 2031. Now, I certainly get why NASA is planning to do this — the station is getting pretty old, with the first components docked together way back in 1998, and everything has a lifespan, of course. But, not all of the station is that old, and I suspect that even nine years from now, the ISS could prove very useful for someone, even if it’s too used-up for NASA. That’s why I think some enterprising space agency out there should consider a salvage mission.

Now, I’m pretty sure that NASA won’t go for a salvage mission, and I suspect that even if they agreed to let some other space agency take over the station, NASA would probably want to sell it, for money, because they know what they got, and I’m not here looking to blow a huge wad of cash on some stinky old used space station — I’m looking for a bargain.

That’s why I think this very legitimate salvage has to be done kind of on the down low. So, if you’re considering giving it a try, maybe don’t make too big a deal about it, at least at first.

As for who I think could or should pull this off, I actually do have a space agency in mind, and it’s not one of the usual expected players: Russia may already be planning to separate its ISS modules for its own purposes, and I think if they tried to salvage the whole station, it could be seen as a hostile act.

China is developing their own station currently, and has the first module in orbit. They don’t need a used station. But there is one other country on the verge of human spaceflight that could make a lot of use from a well-used but salvageable space laboratory: India.

Image: ISRO

India’s planned Gaganyaan crewed vehicle is likely to launch its first mission by 2023, which should give India plenty of time to work out any kinks as they work to building reliable human spacecraft, at least one of which will be needed for this plan.

Also, the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) has publicly stated the goal of having their own space station, with a timeline of five to seven years after their first crewed flight of Gaganyaan. Wouldn’t it be so much more appealing to just be able to move into and restore the largest space station ever built by humans? Of course it would.

With all this in mind, here’s my general plan:

Image: Jason Torchinsky

Here’s how it would work: first, whoever is doing this would need to wait until NASA and the ISS partners have undocked from the station for the last time, and made some sort of announcement that the ISS program is finished, and they will soon begin the process of de-orbiting the station.

At this point, with NASA stating that their plans for the station are to ditch it into the Pacific, we can consider the station effectively abandoned, and salvage efforts from from this moment on can be considered legitimate and not, you know, piracy.

Still, no one is getting NASA’s permission for anything, so we have to work quickly and cleverly here.

As soon as possible after the station can definitely be considered abandoned, two launch vehicles should be ready to launch: the first would be an orbital booster module, equipped with an ISS-standard docking module. If India’s ISRO decides to do this, I’d bet that a Gaganyaan modified with the crew module replaced with fuel tanks could do the job?

The ISS may be ready to do its own de-orbit with resupply craft already docked to the station, or, more ideally for this plan, such a de-orbiting vehicle may need to be launched and docked. The best case for this plan would be to get our orbital boost vehicle to the station first.

The orbital boost vehicle would then dock and begin the process of moving the ISS to a new orbit. As soon as possible, a second rocket with the crewed vehicle would launch, and begin the process of catching up with the ISS to rendezvous and dock.

Image: NASA

Once docked, the crew would begin the process of disabling the ISS’ receiving antennae and disabling communication systems. Most of the commands are sent via the S-Band antenna, but to be safe, all comms systems should be disabled, because NASA is full of clever people who could likely take back control of the ISS via HAM radio if they had to.

There may need to be some EVAs involved here, physically removing antennae and hardware from the exterior of the station. This is an extremely important step, because this is how we’ll effectively be able to “change the locks” on the ISS.

Finally, the ISS should be in its new orbit, with its normal comm systems deactivated and replaced with new systems — ideally secure ones — brought up with the crewed module, or on the booster vehicle itself.

Once at this point, with the ISS in a new orbit, taking commands only from its new owner, I think we can consider the ISS salvaged.

This might be a good time to repaint it and re-name it, too.

Listen to me, ISRO or any other up-and-coming space agency: this is a $150 billion asset up there, and even with depreciation, it’s still worth plenty. It’s crazy to just chuck it into the ocean! Go get it!

Read original article here

Astronauts Forced to Take Shelter as Debris Cloud Threatens Space Station

The International Space Station
Image: Roscosmos

All seven astronauts currently aboard the International Space Station are having to take shelter inside their respective spacecraft owing to the sudden appearance of a debris cloud in orbit, the source of which remains unclear.

Information is slowly trickling in, but we do know that the ISS is currently functioning normally and that all seven crew members are healthy and safe. The crew had to take shelter earlier this morning due to the sudden appearance of an orbiting debris field. The unexplained breakup of the defunct Russian satellite Kosmos-1408 is currently the leading candidate for the source of the orbiting debris cloud.

NASA astronauts Raja Chari, Tom Marshburn, Kayla Barron, and ESA astronaut Matthias Maurer are sheltering inside a SpaceX Crew Dragon docked to the ISS, while Russian cosmonauts Anton Shkaplerov, Pyotr Dubrov, and NASA astronaut Mark Vande Hei are inside a Soyuz capsule, reports Russian state-owned news agency TASS. The astronauts could use these spacecraft to safely return to Earth in the event the ISS is damaged by the debris.

A live feed of NASA mission control is available, allowing you to follow the events as they’re happening.

In a tweet, Roscosmos said the crew is “routinely performing operations according to the flight program,” and that the threatening “object” has “moved away from the ISS orbit.” By “object,” the Russian space agency is referring to the debris field. The “station is in the green zone,” Roscosmos added.

“Friends, everything is regular with us!,” tweeted Shkaplerov. “We continue to work on the program.”

Despite these words of reassurance, operations aboard the ISS are most certainly not back to normal. Mission controllers are continually providing countdowns of each debris field transit (i.e. the closest approach of the debris field to the ISS). At 10:32 a.m. ET, controllers provided instructions for the NASA crew to temporarily enter into the Columbus module to perform some quick tasks and to collect personal items should they have to remain inside Dragon overnight (a possible indication that this could take a while).

The debris field transits were happening about once every 93 minutes at first, but now they’re happening about once every 30 to 40 minutes. In an email, Harvard University astrophysicist Jonathan McDowell said that, assuming it’s a debris field caused by a broken-up satellite, “there will be a big error bar on whether there is risk to ISS, hence the caution.”

The source of the debris field remains unconfirmed, but its sudden appearance coincides with reports that Russia has conducted an anti-satellite (ASAT) weapons test. In a tweet, Gunter Krebs, a physicist and editor of Gunter’s Space Page, said the target was an “old Soviet Tselina-D SIGINT satellite called Kosmos-1408 (1982-092A) launched in 1982, which has been dead for decades,” and that ”14 debris objects have been tracked.” But Krebs cautions: “So far no confirmation from official sources.”

U.S. Space Force “is aware of a debris-generating event in outer space” and is “working to characterize the debris field and will continue to ensure all space-faring nations have the information necessary to maneuver satellites if impacted,” tweeted space reporter Joey Roulette from the New York Times.

Today’s incident comes less than a week after the ISS had to make an emergency maneuver to evade potentially threatening space junk. In that case, it was a remnant of the Fengyun-1C weather satellite, which China deliberately destroyed in 2007 as part of an anti-satellite missile test. India did something similar in 2019, joining the United States, Russia, and China as countries that have tested anti-satellite weapons. Currently, the use of ASATs “occupy a gray zone” when it comes to international arms control, writes Talia M. Blatt from Harvard University.  

This is a developing story and we will update this article as we learn more.



Read original article here