Tag Archives: Saquon

Here’s how close Saquon Barkley, Josh Jacobs reportedly were to long-term deals before franchise tag deadline – CBS Sports

  1. Here’s how close Saquon Barkley, Josh Jacobs reportedly were to long-term deals before franchise tag deadline CBS Sports
  2. Giants no longer see Saquon Barkley as more than just a running back Newsday
  3. Giants are trapped without Saquon Barkley, why DeAndre Hopkins chose Titans over Pats | THE HERD The Herd with Colin Cowherd
  4. No deals for tagged RBs Saquon Barkley, Josh Jacobs, Tony Pollard – ESPN ESPN
  5. Derrick Henry, Christian McCaffrey, Jonathan Taylor, Austin Ekeler sound off on absence of RB extensions: ‘Criminal’ Yahoo Sports
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

2023 franchise tag deadline winners, losers: Tough day for Josh Jacobs, Saquon Barkley, Tony Pollard – CBS Sports

  1. 2023 franchise tag deadline winners, losers: Tough day for Josh Jacobs, Saquon Barkley, Tony Pollard CBS Sports
  2. CBA dramatically limits ability of franchise-tagged players to sign long-term deals after mid-July NBC Sports
  3. Reacting to the franchise tag deadline: Saquon Barkley, Josh Jacobs and more | NFL News, Rankings and Statistics Pro Football Focus
  4. 2023 NFL franchise tag tracker: No long-term deals for Saquon Barkley, Josh Jacobs or Tony Pollard CBS Sports
  5. Saquon Barkley, Josh Jacobs, Tony Pollard did not reach agreement on long-term deals NBC Sports
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Giants news, 4/13: Saquon Barkley, Waller trade, drafting a QB Day 3, more headlines – Big Blue View

  1. Giants news, 4/13: Saquon Barkley, Waller trade, drafting a QB Day 3, more headlines Big Blue View
  2. Saquon Barkley won’t sign franchise tag before Giants’ offseason program starts ESPN
  3. Giants’ Saquon Barkley skipping spring workouts. So what? He has no leverage — and should take what he can ge NJ.com
  4. Saquon Barkley, Dexter Lawrence set to skip start of Giants’ 2023 offseason program, per reports CBS Sports
  5. DL Dexter Lawrence Seeking New Contract, Won’t Report To Start Of Giants’ Offseason Program profootballrumors.com
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Giants’ Saquon Barkley won’t sign franchise tag, will miss start of offseason program: reports – Fox News

  1. Giants’ Saquon Barkley won’t sign franchise tag, will miss start of offseason program: reports Fox News
  2. Saquon Barkley won’t sign franchise tag before Giants’ offseason program starts ESPN
  3. Saquon Barkley, Dexter Lawrence set to skip start of Giants’ 2023 offseason program, per reports CBS Sports
  4. Giants RB Saquon Barkley reportedly won’t sign franchise tag before start of offseason program Yahoo Sports
  5. DL Dexter Lawrence Seeking New Contract, Won’t Report To Start Of Giants’ Offseason Program profootballrumors.com
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Giants RB Saquon Barkley reportedly won’t sign franchise tag before start of offseason program – Yahoo Sports

  1. Giants RB Saquon Barkley reportedly won’t sign franchise tag before start of offseason program Yahoo Sports
  2. Report: Saquon Barkley won’t sign tag ahead of Giants offseason program NBC Sports
  3. Saquon Barkley won’t sign franchise tag, will not participate in Giants’ offseason program: Reports The Athletic
  4. Saquon Barkley will not sign Giants’ franchise tag, set to skip start of 2023 offseason program, per report CBS Sports
  5. Saquon Barkley won’t sign franchise tag, won’t be eligible for Giants offseason program Newsday
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Saquon Barkley on goals for next contract: ‘I’m not too concerned with resetting any markets, I’m realistic’

Moments after his team’s season-ending 38-7 loss to the Eagles on Saturday night, Saquon Barkley was asked about his future with the Giants heading into the offseason. 

A former first-round pick, Barkley is set to become a free agent when the new league year begins on March 16. While he isn’t sure whether or not he will be back with the team, the two-time Pro Bowl running back expressed optimism regarding his future with Big Blue. 

“I can’t envision that being my last time in a Giants uniform,” Barkley said following his team’s divisional round playoff loss, via NFL Media. 

Speaking to reporters on Sunday as the Giants were cleaning out their lockers, Barkley was asked what type of contract he would be looking for in the offseason.

“I’m not really too concerned with resetting any markets,” Barkley said. “I’m realistic. I know what I was on pace to do, but having two years of injuries doesn’t help. But I think I was able to show the caliber of player I am.”

The 2022 season was an important one for Barkley, who played at a Pro Bowl level after injuries dogged him during the previous two seasons. This season, Barkley ran for a career-high 1,312 yards. He also ran for 10 scores while catching 57 passes for 338 yards in 16 regular-season games. 

Barkley played an integral role in the Giants’ upset win over the Vikings on Super Wild Card Weekend. He had two touchdowns on the ground while totaling 109 all-purpose yards on 14 touches. Barkley has 82 yards on 11 touches against the Eagles. His 39-yard run helped set up the Giants’ only touchdown. 

“I wanted to show them the guy they drafted is still here,” Barkley said. “I hope I did that. Everyone knows I would love to be a Giant for life, but I really can’t give 100% answers. Sometime this week, I’ll have a conversation with my agent Kim and see what’s up.”

Barkley undoubtedly increased his market value this past season. His market value is currently projected at $47.8 million over four years for an annual salary of just under $12 million annually, according to Spotrac. While that salary would not elevate his status among the league’s highest-paid running backs, it would make him the ninth running back to command a salary that pays him at least $10 million per season. 

Christian McCaffrey currently paces all running backs in average salary at just over $16 million. Alvin Kamara, Ezekiel Elliott and Dalvin Cook round out the list of running backs who make $15 million annually. Derrick Henry, Nick Chubb, Aaron Jones and Joe Mixon are the only other running backs who currently average making at least $12 million per season. Barkley proved this season that, when healthy, his talent commands similar compensation. 

The Giants have the desired cap space should they decide to further invest in Barkley. The Giants currently have the third-most cap space in the NFL and the most in the ultra-competitive NFC East. 

require.config({"baseUrl":"https://sportsfly.cbsistatic.com/fly-0393/bundles/sportsmediajs/js-build","config":{"version":{"fly/components/accordion":"1.0","fly/components/alert":"1.0","fly/components/base":"1.0","fly/components/carousel":"1.0","fly/components/dropdown":"1.0","fly/components/fixate":"1.0","fly/components/form-validate":"1.0","fly/components/image-gallery":"1.0","fly/components/iframe-messenger":"1.0","fly/components/load-more":"1.0","fly/components/load-more-article":"1.0","fly/components/load-more-scroll":"1.0","fly/components/loading":"1.0","fly/components/modal":"1.0","fly/components/modal-iframe":"1.0","fly/components/network-bar":"1.0","fly/components/poll":"1.0","fly/components/search-player":"1.0","fly/components/social-button":"1.0","fly/components/social-counts":"1.0","fly/components/social-links":"1.0","fly/components/tabs":"1.0","fly/components/video":"1.0","fly/libs/easy-xdm":"2.4.17.1","fly/libs/jquery.cookie":"1.2","fly/libs/jquery.throttle-debounce":"1.1","fly/libs/jquery.widget":"1.9.2","fly/libs/omniture.s-code":"1.0","fly/utils/jquery-mobile-init":"1.0","fly/libs/jquery.mobile":"1.3.2","fly/libs/backbone":"1.0.0","fly/libs/underscore":"1.5.1","fly/libs/jquery.easing":"1.3","fly/managers/ad":"2.0","fly/managers/components":"1.0","fly/managers/cookie":"1.0","fly/managers/debug":"1.0","fly/managers/geo":"1.0","fly/managers/gpt":"4.3","fly/managers/history":"2.0","fly/managers/madison":"1.0","fly/managers/social-authentication":"1.0","fly/utils/data-prefix":"1.0","fly/utils/data-selector":"1.0","fly/utils/function-natives":"1.0","fly/utils/guid":"1.0","fly/utils/log":"1.0","fly/utils/object-helper":"1.0","fly/utils/string-helper":"1.0","fly/utils/string-vars":"1.0","fly/utils/url-helper":"1.0","libs/jshashtable":"2.1","libs/select2":"3.5.1","libs/jsonp":"2.4.0","libs/jquery/mobile":"1.4.5","libs/modernizr.custom":"2.6.2","libs/velocity":"1.2.2","libs/dataTables":"1.10.6","libs/dataTables.fixedColumns":"3.0.4","libs/dataTables.fixedHeader":"2.1.2","libs/dateformat":"1.0.3","libs/waypoints/infinite":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/inview":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/jquery.waypoints":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/sticky":"3.1.1","libs/jquery/dotdotdot":"1.6.1","libs/jquery/flexslider":"2.1","libs/jquery/lazyload":"1.9.3","libs/jquery/maskedinput":"1.3.1","libs/jquery/marquee":"1.3.1","libs/jquery/numberformatter":"1.2.3","libs/jquery/placeholder":"0.2.4","libs/jquery/scrollbar":"0.1.6","libs/jquery/tablesorter":"2.0.5","libs/jquery/touchswipe":"1.6.18","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.core":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.draggable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.mouse":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.position":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.slider":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.sortable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.touch-punch":"0.2.3","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.autocomplete":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.accordion":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tabs":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.menu":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.dialog":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.resizable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.button":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tooltip":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.effects":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.datepicker":"1.11.4"}},"shim":{"liveconnection/managers/connection":{"deps":["liveconnection/libs/sockjs-0.3.4"]},"liveconnection/libs/sockjs-0.3.4":{"exports":"SockJS"},"libs/setValueFromArray":{"exports":"set"},"libs/getValueFromArray":{"exports":"get"},"fly/libs/jquery.mobile-1.3.2":["version!fly/utils/jquery-mobile-init"],"libs/backbone.marionette":{"deps":["jquery","version!fly/libs/underscore","version!fly/libs/backbone"],"exports":"Marionette"},"fly/libs/underscore-1.5.1":{"exports":"_"},"fly/libs/backbone-1.0.0":{"deps":["version!fly/libs/underscore","jquery"],"exports":"Backbone"},"libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tabs-1.11.4":["jquery","version!libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.core","version!fly/libs/jquery.widget"],"libs/jquery/flexslider-2.1":["jquery"],"libs/dataTables.fixedColumns-3.0.4":["jquery","version!libs/dataTables"],"libs/dataTables.fixedHeader-2.1.2":["jquery","version!libs/dataTables"],"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/app/VideoPlayer/AdobePass-min.js":["https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/util/Utils-min.js"]},"map":{"*":{"adobe-pass":"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/app/VideoPlayer/AdobePass-min.js","facebook":"https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js","facebook-debug":"https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all/debug.js","google":"https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js","google-platform":"https://apis.google.com/js/client:platform.js","google-csa":"https://www.google.com/adsense/search/async-ads.js","google-javascript-api":"https://www.google.com/jsapi","google-client-api":"https://apis.google.com/js/api:client.js","gpt":"https://securepubads.g.doubleclick.net/tag/js/gpt.js","hlsjs":"https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/hls.js/1.0.7/hls.js","recaptcha":"https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?onload=loadRecaptcha&render=explicit","recaptcha_ajax":"https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api/js/recaptcha_ajax.js","supreme-golf":"https://sgapps-staging.supremegolf.com/search/assets/js/bundle.js","taboola":"https://cdn.taboola.com/libtrc/cbsinteractive-cbssports/loader.js","twitter":"https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js","video-avia":"https://vidtech.cbsinteractive.com/avia-js/2.4.0/player/avia.min.js","video-avia-ui":"https://vidtech.cbsinteractive.com/avia-js/2.4.0/plugins/ui/avia.ui.min.js","video-avia-gam":"https://vidtech.cbsinteractive.com/avia-js/2.4.0/plugins/gam/avia.gam.min.js","video-avia-hls":"https://vidtech.cbsinteractive.com/avia-js/2.4.0/plugins/hls/avia.hls.min.js","video-avia-playlist":"https://vidtech.cbsinteractive.com/avia-js/2.4.0/plugins/playlist/avia.playlist.min.js","video-ima3":"https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/sdkloader/ima3.js","video-ima3-dai":"https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/sdkloader/ima3_dai.js","video-utils":"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/util/Utils-min.js","video-vast-tracking":"https://vidtech.cbsinteractive.com/sb55/vast-js/vtg-vast-client.js"}},"waitSeconds":300});



Read original article here

Saquon Barkley: When I saw Tyrod Taylor go down, I realized I was up next at QB

Getty Images

Giants running back Saquon Barkley said late last week that he feels like he’s back to being the player he was during his first couple of years in the NFL, but Sunday’s game against the Bears offered Barkley a chance to do something new.

Daniel Jones left the game with an ankle injury and backup Tyrod Taylor had to come out for a concussion evaluation, which left Barkley in position to take snaps as a Wildcat quarterback. Jones eventually came back in to hand the ball off, but the Wildcat helped set up a field goal as the Giants finished out a 20-12 victory at home.

Barkley ended the day with 31 carries for 146 yards and a good feeling about his cameo as the quarterback.

“When I saw Tyrod go down, I kind of realized I’m up next,” Barkley said. “I’m the quarterback. First of all, you have to give credit to DJ coming back in the game. I can’t curse, he’s a tough you know what. Nothing but respect for him to go in and continue to fight through that for his team just shows you the type of person and type of player he is. I think I just tried my best to read it. It’s really not that hard, I guess, but I think I made the right reads on them. But we were able to keep the ball moving, get down field, get some points and the defense did a great job for us.”

The Giants will be hoping that Jones is well enough to play against the Packers in London this week, but the first four weeks have shown that the offensive focus should be on Barkley regardless of who is taking the snaps.

Read original article here

Big Blue View mailbag: Saquon Barkley, Malik Willis, and a whole lot more

This is a busy, overflowing Big Blue View Mailbag filled with draft and free agency questions as the New York Giants proceed through an insanely interesting offseason. Let’s get to it.

Jeffrey Mleziva asks: If the Giants retain Barkley this year then let him walk in 2023, would they be eligible to receive a compensation pick in 2024? I know future draft picks aren’t viewed as being “worth” as much as picks in the current year, but if the market isn’t there to trade him, is this something that would need to be considered?

Ed says: Jeffrey, yes, that is possible. The loss of Evan Engram to the Jacksonville Jaguars is currently projected to qualify the Giants for a fifth-round pick in 2023. I don’t want to speculate on what the pick might be, but Barkley would qualify for the compensatory formula.


Two Malik Willis questions this week.

Doug asks: Without making this a discussion about Daniel Jones — been there, done that — what do you think of Malik Willis at 7? From what I read, I see enormous upside and about average risk for a first round QB. He surely would need to sit and watch for a year.

Robert Forgione asks: Ed, the more I hear about Malik Willis, the more I like. Is it possible, at all, that even with Schoen saying all the right things about Daniel Jones, that the Giants pick Willis at 5. Just a hunch. They took Josh Allen, when there were many doubters as to Allen’s ability to perform at next level. If Schoen, Brown, Daboll think Willis could be “the guy”would they pull the trigger?

Ed says: I think I hope there is a team out there in full bloom love with Willis. Or Matt Corral. Or Kenny Pickett. Enough that they would give up a 2023 first-round pick to move up to No. 5 or No. 7 to get him. That is the scenario I think GM Joe Schoen goes to bed at night praying for.

Never say never — I hate using that phrase because it was a Ben McAdoo favorite, but it applies. I would, though, be as stunned by the Giants taking a quarterback at No. 5 or No. 7 as I’ve been by anything in the more than 15 years I have covered this team.


Walker Joyce asks: I‘ve read a ton of copy on our incumbent QB over the last several months, including the link you posted today, but one central question continues to be ignored:

Is Jones’ mysterious neck injury healed?

As far as I can tell, this hasn’t been explored since he went on IR. We don’t even know what happened to him, and whether or not it could be a chronic condition.

If Daniel is healthy, and can stay that way, I have great confidence that Daboll, et al can coach him up and have him reach his max potential. Especially as Schoen rebuilds the O-line, and the skill guys also heal. But if his cervical spine is still an issue, he’s probably finished.

So…what’s going on?

Ed says: Walker, we don’t know. The Giants are — obviously — not required to give us any injury information during the offseason. And they have not. No one around him is going to speak out of turn, either. What we heard at the end of the season was that Jones could practice, he could work out, he could lift weights. He just wasn’t cleared for contact. Pretty much all practice for quarterbacks is non-contact, anyway.

The one thing I will say is I think something would have filtered out by now if there were real long-term concern. The Giants get an extra mini-camp because they have a new head coach. As far as we know, that is likely to begin April 4. We will try to find out more then.


Ronald Buchheim asks: Ed, I was disappointed that the Giants released Carter. He was showing great potential just before he tore his Achilles, and had five sacks in the final four games of last season, possibly because he was finally back to full strength. The Giants are desperate for edge rushers. Why not give Carter a chance to prove he’s what we hoped for? You wrote that would be worthwhile if the Giants could get him at a reasonable price. But I read that they didn’t make much of an effort, if any, to sign him. Might this be a case of cleaning house without sufficient regard for Carter’s potential?

Ed says: Ronald, the Giants did not “release” Lorenzo Carter. He was an unrestricted free agent, able to negotiate with every team in the NFL, and he chose to sign with the Atlanta Falcons.

Remember the Giants have virtually no salary cap space and have — for the most part — been signing players to the most inexpensive contracts possible. Carter signed a one-year, $3.5 million deal with Atlanta. Mike Garafolo reported that the Giants tried to bring Carter back, but even that relatively small amount is too rich for the Giants at this point.

Simply put, this is the reality of where the Giants are right now. They have extremely limited financial resources, made a calculated decision regarding their priorities of how to use those limited resources, and Carter fell outside what they could do.


Ed says: Jeffrey, I don’t know if Cross’s Pro Day puts him in Joe Schoen’s top 7 picks. I will say that I am finding fewer and fewer reasons to keep him out of mine. Don’t tell me he can’t run block. I have seen that he can. He just hasn’t been asked to do it a lot. I know he hasn’t played right tackle. He is, though, just 21 years of age. There will be an adjustment, but don’t tell me he can’t make it. The one thing that bugs me is that he never played out of a three-point stance in college. Again, though, he’s 21 and he can figure it out.

I love Ikem Ekwonu’s tenacity and his upside. He’s a home run for the Giants if they can get him. I can’t find a whole lot of reasons to complain about Evan Neal. He’s a plug and play right tackle who will be a good one.

Cross, most analysts will tell you, is the best pass blocking tackle in the class right now. It would be hard to be unhappy with the Giants landing that in the draft.


Rowland Smith asks: In free agency to date, the Giants have signed a significant number of players from either Buffalo or Baltimore, that have connections to the new coaching staff. Do you think that this is a positive or a negative? The Giants have a pro player scouting organization charged with identifying the best available free agent across the league. Its hard to imagine that all of the best free agents just happen to have played on teams where current Giants coaches previously worked. So are our pro player scouts doing their job?

On the other hand, these signings might be considered a positive because these players may place some value on continuing to play for our new coaches with a new team, and as a result we are getting better players at a bit of a bargain with these signings. A third possibility is that among the vast expanse of second tier players in the league it is so hard to make any fine distinctions, that going with guys the coaches know is as good as any other strategy.

On a final note, with the exception of Nate Ebner I don’t remember many free agent signings with connections to the previous coaching staff. If that is the case, is this recent trend a cause for some optimism?

Ed says: Rowland, I think that’s a complicated question to answer. There are both good and bad things about signing players your front office or coaching staff has a prior relationship with.

On the positive side, if you have coaches and front office people with a prior working relationship with a player, you have invaluable first-hand knowledge of what makes that player tick, how he learns, how he works, how he is in the locker and meeting rooms, how to use him on the field. On the flip side, simply signing guys you know and discarding guys you don’t can be lazy scouting. That’s how the Giants have lost players like Devon Kinnard, Romeo Okwara and Michael Thomas in the past

In this case, I do not think the Giants are being lazy. I think they are honestly assessing the roster and trying to keep players they think can help. I think they are being practical. They don’t have much money. They know and trust many of these players. These players know and trust them. They can buy GM Joe Schoen time to get the Giants’ house in order.

As for connections to the Judge coaching staff, there were several others. Logan Ryan was with Joe Judge and Patrick Graham in New England. So was Danny Shelton. Dion Lewis, who played for the Giants in 2021, was a Judge favorite from New England. Keion Crossen, acquired via trade, was a Judge guy from the Patriots. Korey Cunningham spent time with the Patriots while Judge was there. Graham Gano played for Thomas McGaughey in Carolina. Judge also had an affinity for Nate Solder from their New England days. I wouldn’t be surprised if I missed a couple.


Christopher Benfer asks: Coming up on the draft, it looks like most people (me included) want to see some significant improvement along the O-Line, particularly for the right tackle spot. Traditionally, left tackle was looked on as the more premier position and teams would pay a premium for a quality LT. With the Giants picking in the top 10 (twice), do we need to spend that high of a pick to get a solid starter at RT? Do the distinctions between the tackle positions really matter in today’s NFL? If there really is a difference between the spots, is there a general feel for guys who would specifically be starting quality RT’s a little later in the draft? I’d love to come out of this with a franchise guy at both tackle spots, but as you always say it is important to maximize resources and I’m wondering if dropping down a bit and focusing on a guy more suited to his expected role (while picking up some additional picks) wouldn’t be a better solution.

Ed says: Christopher, there are a number of layers to your question. I’m going to try to hit them all, but not in the order you asked them.

Is there really a difference between the two positions? Well, yes and no. Teams still generally want the better pass protector at left tackle and the better, more powerful run blocker at right tackle.

First, almost all NFL quarterbacks are right-handed. That makes the left tackle the “blind side” protector. In theory, the quarterback can see the rusher coming from his right — the side faces — and should be able to react better. So, theoretically, pressure you can see is less impactful than pressure you can’t see.

The other reality, and I don’t know the reason for this, is that many teams are right-handed in the run game. Per NFL Savant, the Giants ran 120 times (37.98) percent of the time to the right of center last season and 95 times (30.06) to the left. The Baltimore Ravens ran to the right 53.52 percent of the time in 2021.

Do the distinctions really matter? Well, they shouldn’t. It’s a matchup league and defenses no longer line up a standard three- or four-man front with the same players in the same spots all the time. Guys float all around as coordinators seek matchups and seek to stress whoever they identify as the weak players on an offensive line. Still, left tackles get the big paychecks. The four highest-paid tackles and 15 of the top 20 tackle wage earners play on the left. So, the NFL still values left tackles over right tackles.

Now, do the Giants “need” to spend a pick at No. 5 or No. 7 to get their right tackle? No, but their odds of finding a long-term solution are better if they do. The top five right tackles by paycheck are Ryan Ramcyzk, Brian O’Neill, Lane Johnson, Braden Smith and Taylor Moton. Ramczyk and Johnson were first-round picks. O’Neill, Smith and Moton were second-round picks. The Bills found Spencer Brown, their starting left tackle, in the third round of the 2021 draft.

You can always find guards and centers in the middle to late portions of the draft. Those guys don’t necessarily need some manner of elite athletic traits. Tackle is different. I would have to do an in-depth study to get accurate numbers, but I would say in general your return on investment is going to be greater the earlier you dive into the tackle pool.

As for trading down, I’ve said over and over I think moving down with one of those two top-10 picks is a strategy that has to be in play. You have to see what happens before the Giants are on the clock and who does or does not want to move up. It has to be a consideration, but you just have to wait and see what is on the table when it’s time to make a decision.


William Bowman asks: Does Saquon have the potential to be used in the same way as the 49ers used Deebo Samuel?

Ed says: William, they can both catch passes and run with the ball but they are very different players.

Saquon Barkley is a running back with pass-catching ability. Yes, sometimes pass-catching ability the Giants have not been able to use well enough. Still, he is a running back first.

Deebo Samuel is a wide receiver who has the ability to occasionally run the ball out of the backfield. He had 77 receptions and 59 carries in 2021.

They are both “offensive weapons.” They are not, though, the same player.


Scott Coghlan asks: Hey Ed, I’ve seen a few national football journalists push for a Baker Mayfield trade to the Giants. I am not in favor, as I question whether he is much better than DJ. What do you think of the idea?

Ed says: Scott, I think Skip Bayless is an idiot. I think it’s a dumb idea, and that’s all I’m going to say.


Jesse Sorel asks: If the top 2 tackles (Neal and Ekwonu) are off the board and Giants take Sauce with the 5th pick and can’t find a trade partner for the 7th pick and Charles Cross is still on the board. Do you think the Giants pick Cross with the possible intentions on moving him to left tackle and Thomas to right tackle? Thomas at this point seems like a better and more experienced run blocker. Cross seems really athletic for his size. What is your opinion?

Ed says: Jesse, I understand the question. Anything is possible, but this is something I just don’t see. It makes no sense to me to move a player who is already a successful NFL left tackle — generally considered the most important position on your offensive line — for a player who has never played an NFL snap. I would not surprised if the Giants draft Cross. I would be shocked if they do that and then move Thomas.



Read original article here

Reporters give advice on Saquon Barkley, Tony Pollard, Titans RBs

There is great joy and likewise utter misery in choosing streaming options.

As fantasy managers, we’ve all been there. You get caught short at a position because of injuries, COVID-19, bye weeks, etc. Suddenly you’re scanning the waiver wire looking at projected points and matchups, trying to choose between players you know very little about. In some cases their coaches don’t know how they’ll play either.

Of the running backs who played on Thanksgiving Day, a few were primary streaming options this week. In New Orleans, Tony Jones Jr. figured to play a big role with both Alvin Kamara and Mark Ingram unable to go. And while Jones did get 16 carries, a nice volume for a streaming option, which is half the battle, he wasn’t targeted in the passing game and rushed for only 27 yards. And 2.7 fantasy points does not a great streaming option make.

As it turns out, the better streaming option from the Saints was Ty Montgomery. He got six carries and seven targets in the passing game that resulted in five receptions. He mustered only 45 yards, but put it with the receptions in a PPR league and Montgomery was a much better option than Jones.

ESPN fantasy sports researcher Kyle Soppe, who is responsible for our 32 questions, noticed all of the interesting happenings on Thursday, and has questions about Montgomery as well running backs you possibly streamed such as Matt Breida of Buffalo and Tony Pollard of Dallas.

Riding byes this week are Kansas City and Arizona. So questions about the respective West Division leaders will resume next week. Away we go.

AFC EAST

Is Matt Breida’s role in this offense something we should expect to continue to grow?

Yes, but more production doesn’t mean he will be seeing the field as much as a top running back. This version of the Bills’ offense will never have a true No. 1 back, but Breida is certainly seeing an uptick in opportunities and has brought much-needed speed. He has scored at least one touchdown in two of the last three games and is primed to continue to have more opportunities. — Alaina Getzenberg


It has been every other week for Myles Gaskin. After 23 carries on Sunday, can we finally count on him for consecutive good games?

You can count on him for a good workload — and you can work with that in fantasy football. Miami’s win in Week 11 marked Gaskin’s fifth straight game with at least 12 carries and 15 total touches. Even more promising? He has 17 red-zone touches over the past three weeks — 12 of which came inside the 10-yard line. With Malcolm Brown not expected to return this week, Gaskin should be the Dolphins’ unquestioned RB1 yet again. — Marcel Louis-Jacques


If you have to pick one running back from this offense the rest of the way, who would it be?

Damien Harris. While rookie Rhamondre Stevenson is coming on strong, and a case could be made for him to be the choice, Harris is still 1A, and experience tilts the needle in his direction ever so slightly. Rushing touchdowns this season: Harris 7, Stevenson 3. — Mike Reiss


Elijah Moore seems to be coming into his own. Do you expect his growth to continue this season? How good can he be in 2022?

Moore could be the Jets’ WR1 in 2022, ahead of Corey Davis. That’s how much the organization thinks of him. He has 24 receptions, 336 yards and four TDs over the last four games. Don’t be surprised, though, if his production dips temporarily. QB Zach Wilson, who returns from a four-game knee injury, didn’t have much success with Moore early in the year; Davis was his go-to receiver. It may take some time before Wilson and Moore build their chemistry. — Rich Cimini

play

2:00

Matthew Berry and Field Yates break down Elijah Moore’s emergence as a top-scoring fantasy wide receiver in recent weeks.

AFC NORTH

Safe to label Devonta Freeman as the leader of this backfield for Week 12? For the rest of the season?

Absolutely for Week 12, and most likely for the rest of the season. Freeman has shown the most burst of all the Ravens running backs signed to help fill the void of the injury-filled backfield. It was noticeable when Freeman still received 60% of the running back carries, even after Latavius Murray returned from his ankle injury. Ravens coach John Harbaugh has always talked about going with the hot hand, and Freeman is the hottest of the backs. But, if he slows down, Baltimore could turn to Murray, who is more of an inside-the-tackles runner. — Jamison Hensley

play

1:26

Field Yates and Matthew Berry break down Devonta Freeman’s recent success in fantasy.


That’s three high-usage games out of four for Tyler Boyd. Do you think he can sustain consistent, albeit low upside, value moving forward?

The Bengals have been very hard to predict. What we believed the offensive philosophy might be this season has shifted and adapted throughout the course of the season. There does seem to be some optimism about Boyd maintaining his current usage rate. Bengals coach Zac Taylor took the blame for Boyd’s two-target outing against Cleveland in Week 9. Bengals QB Joe Burrow called Boyd his comfort blanket, which will always make him a valuable resource. — Ben Baby


D’Ernest Johnson was an afterthought with Nick Chubb back; safe to cut ties with him if the roster spot is needed?

Yes, safe to cut ties with Johnson. Especially with Chubb’s wingman, Kareem Hunt, on the way back from the calf injury. — Jake Trotter


Sunday night was Chase Claypool’s best game in over a month; safe to call him healthy and poised for a strong finish to the season?

He’s healthy, but it’s hard to trust any Steelers receiver’s fantasy output. Ben Roethlisberger likes to spread the ball around, though Diontae Johnson and Claypool are the two he trusts the most. Still, the Steelers utilize Najee Harris in the run game, and Pat Freiermuth has been coming on strong in recent weeks, too. Claypool is worth keeping around on a fantasy team if there’s a bench spot because he could get hot, but it’s too soon to tell just how strong he’ll finish the season. — Brooke Pryor

AFC SOUTH

Brandin Cooks has found producing difficult lately; does it continue, or can he regain his early season form?

Don’t expect Cooks to replicate what he did in the first three weeks — coach David Culley said “it wasn’t intentional” for Cooks to have such a high target share early in the season — but his numbers should be somewhere in the middle. Culley said teams are doubling Cooks way more as the season has gone on, but given the receiver’s chemistry with Tyrod Taylor, his production should increase. — Sarah Barshop


Make your case for Jonathan Taylor as the top overall pick next season.

The numbers don’t lie. Taylor not only leads the NFL in rushing yards (1,122) by nearly 200 yards over the injured Derrick Henry, he leads the entire league in yards from scrimmage (1,444) by more than 300 yards over the next-closest player — Rams receiver Cooper Kupp (1,136) to go with 13 total touchdowns. Enough said. — Mike Wells

play

2:07

Field Yates and Matthew Berry react to Jonathan Taylor’s five-touchdown performance for the Colts on Sunday.


Do you think James Robinson can take advantage of a favorable upcoming schedule?

That depends on how banged up he is. He’s dealing with heel and knee injuries, and unless the Jaguars shut him down for a couple weeks he’ll have to battle through them every week. You could see in last Sunday’s game against San Francisco that Robinson doesn’t have the same burst through the line of scrimmage that he did before the injury. Another issue for Robinson is the Jaguars are having a hard time consistently moving the ball and are falling behind by double digits, which effectively takes the run game out of play. — Michael DiRocco


Does any Titans running back need to be rostered?

No! Don’t be fooled by how the Titans collectively topped 100 yards rushing last week. That came against a Texans’ defense that was allowing 136 rushing yards per game entering last week. D’Onta Foreman and Dontrell Hilliard have flashed, but they’ll continue to be part of a committee. The stats simply aren’t relevant enough to warrant rostering any Titans back, especially with no one emerging as a candidate to get 15+ carries. — Turron Davenport

AFC WEST

Is Courtland Sutton going to see more looks, or will his low production/usage in games with Jerry Jeudy active continue?

If the Broncos really self-scouted during the bye and stick to what they do best on offense, Sutton’s productivity should increase. But it’s up to the Broncos. If they put quarterback Teddy Bridgewater under center more, use play action more, they will have more success pushing the ball down the field in the passing game. In the win over the Cowboys they had a season-best 190 yards rushing, as well as their only game of the season with multiple completions of more than 40 yards. If they run the ball a little more, the opportunities for Sutton to have impact out of the play action will rise. — Jeff Legwold


Are you buying DeSean Jackson as a weekly upside threat (102 yards, but tied for fifth on the team in targets on Thanksgiving)?

Once on Thanksgiving and twice on Sundays. Jackson was signed to bring that big-play possibility and production, and produce he did at Dallas. The trust is there with QB Derek Carr, who said it was “fun” to throw the soon-to-be 35-year-old wide out the ball. And with another old NFC East rival in Washington up next, that chip on Jackson’s shoulder will only loom larger. — Paul Gutierrez


Are you buying the chunk run plays we saw Sunday night from Justin Herbert as a real part of his game moving forward?

Not necessarily, but it worked well in this instance and his sliding game was on point. If the gaps are there and the defense is giving it to him, he proved what an asset his wheels are. But little of that was by design. — Shelley Smith

NFC EAST

Give us your best guess for average touches per game moving forward for Ezekiel Elliott and Tony Pollard.

If the Cowboys were in a 60-40 split between Elliott and Pollard for a good spell earlier in the season, it will now be closer to 50-50. But don’t confuse this with any ineffectiveness from Elliott. He is dealing with a bone bruise in his knee that is limiting him. He is trying to play through it, and the Cowboys are managing his workload if not so much his snap count. With a longer break after next Thursday’s game vs. the Saints, the Cowboys hope that will serve as a mini-bye for Elliott. The running game as a whole, however, needs to improve. Aside from a 31-yard run vs. the Chiefs, Pollard’s yard per carry average is not much different than Elliott’s. — Todd Archer


What are your weekly touch expectations moving forward for Saquon Barkley on a 3-7 team?

Barkley played 32 snaps (59.3%) and had 12 touches in Tampa Bay following a six-week absence. It would have been more if it wasn’t a blowout in the fourth quarter. Barkley should creep closer to 20 touches and 75% of the snaps on Sunday in Philadelphia. Expect his role to increase only as he gets healthier. It should mean for some big games. — Jordan Raanan

play

2:34

Field Yates, Stephania Bell and Matthew Berry react to Saquon Barkley’s performance in the Giants’ loss to the Buccaneers.


The backfield rotation seemed to vary by quarter. Do you expect any RB to earn the feature role, or is this a committee that will be more of a headache than anything?

Miles Sanders is the starter when healthy and will get the bulk of the snaps, but Jordan Howard has earned a role and could siphon a lot of the touchdowns given his effectiveness as a short-yardage back. Howard is expected to be out at least this week because of injury. However, Boston Scott could be featured given his success against the Giants in the past (222 rush yards, 5 TDs in 4 games). — Tim McManus


Antonio Gibson looked like “the guy” in Week 10, not so much in Week 11. Moving forward, can we count on him for 15 touches a game, or is it going to vary weekly?

Actually, he looked a lot like “The Guy” in Week 11 — in the second half, that is. That’s when he gained 76 of his 95 yards, following a three-series benching at the end of the first half after he had fumbled. The fumbling issues will be worth watching down the stretch; he has fumbled five times this season, losing three. If it continues to happen, beware. Short of that, yes you can expect 15 touches a game — provided his shin holds up. They like how Gibson is running – more physical, pressing the hole better. They’ve found an offensive identity and it centers around their run game. The other backs — J.D. McKissic and Jaret Patterson — have shown they can be effective. But Gibson remains the primary focus. — John Keim

NFC NORTH

Cole Kmet’s role is on the rise: Can we count on him weekly to produce viable numbers?

I think so. Kmet is a viable member of the offense who is a proven pass-catcher. Unfortunately, he often got lost in the shuffle earlier in the season because the Bears were such a mess on offense. Kmet, however, has emerged over the past couple of weeks and I see no reason for that to change. To clarify, he isn’t going to put up eye-popping statistics. But viable numbers? Absolutely. — Jeff Dickerson


How many touches should we expect from Jamaal Williams if D’Andre Swift were to miss time?

On average, even with Swift, Williams is already seeing a little over 12 touches per game. On Thanksgiving, he got 15 carries for 65 yards with another five receptions for 18 yards, so that would be around the number I would expect him to see if Swift were to remain out. Although he’s not as gifted as Swift, he has proven that he’s more than capable of carrying that load as a dual threat, if necessary. — Eric Woodyard


Anything to the heavy Marquez Valdes-Scantling usage against the Vikings, or was it simply a one-week matchup thing?

Allen Lazard’s absence due to a shoulder injury helped get him more in the plan. Also, MVS’ hamstring injury finally appears to be completely healed. He could have trouble this week, though, because all the injuries on the offensive line might force Aaron Rodgers to get the ball out much faster, which means fewer deep-ball chances for MVS. — Rob Demovsky


Minnesota’s final four games of the season: Bears (twice), Packers and Rams. Can Kirk Cousins be a top-10 QB over that valuable stretch?

Yes. Cousins ranks top 10 in all the major passing categories (passer rating, QBR, completion percentage, yards, touchdowns) and his 21-2 touchdown-to-interception ratio is insanely good. Mike Zimmer wants his quarterback to keep “going for the jugular” despite throwing two near-interceptions versus Green Bay, and if Cousins can keep the Vikings’ offense humming with this new-found aggressive attitude (PFF has him ranked fourth in expected points added), Minnesota should fare well against two bottom-half defenses in Chicago and Detroit. — Courtney Cronin

NFC SOUTH

Would the return of Calvin Ridley help Kyle Pitts, or would it further hurt his upside by taking targets off his plate?

A return of Calvin Ridley — which is anything but certain as Arthur Smith had no update Monday even though Ridley is now eligible to return off the NFI list — would be beneficial to Kyle Pitts. While it might shrink his target share, it would give Atlanta three players defenses must account for every play — Pitts, Cordarrelle Patterson and Ridley. That alone could leave Pitts in some single-coverage situations, which might lead to more breakout plays. Right now, Pitts is the main target for defenses in the intermediate and deep passing game, and it has shown in his — and Atlanta’s — production. — Michael Rothstein


Is Cam Newton back to being a viable option?

Well, he had two touchdowns on only eight plays in his first outing, and he followed that with two touchdown passes and one rushing touchdown in his first full game. So YES. He’s a viable option. The more he learns this offense the more dangerous he should be. — David Newton

play

1:40

Matthew Berry explains why he thinks Cam Newton is a borderline QB1 as long as he has the starting job in Carolina.


Can Ty Montgomery work into a weekly role if at least one of Alvin Kamara/Mark Ingram is injured?

No, I think he would need both to be sidelined to make a significant fantasy impact, and I expect one or both to be back next week. But if they do both remain out, Thursday night was a reminder that Montgomery might be just as valuable as Tony Jones Jr. in PPR leagues. And the seven-year vet does deserve credit for being a reliable emergency option at both RB and WR. Remember, he ran for 105 yards in Week 17 last year when the rest of the RB room was wiped out by COVID. — Mike Triplett


Leonard Fournette has impressed as a pass-catcher all season, but his usage is peaking. Can he sustain 6-8 targets per game moving forward?

As long as opposing defenses are hell-bent on stopping the big play downfield — which they have been all year — we’ll continue to see more of Fournette in the short passing game as he’s who Brady trusts the most in the Bucs’ running back room. — Jenna Laine

NFC WEST

The second most productive pass catcher in this offense moving forward will be …

Van Jefferson. Prior to Odell Beckham Jr.’s signing and the season-ending knee injury to Robert Woods, quarterback Matthew Stafford had been looking more often to target the second-year pro and the two have connected on short, intermediate and deep throws. Watch for Stafford to continue to connect with Jefferson, who can be depended on to run crisp routes and hang onto the football. — Lindsey Thiry


A great season for Deebo Samuel is getting better with his usage in the backfield. Can we count on that continuing?

Yes. Here’s the thing, Elijah Mitchell has earned the right to be the team’s primary ball carrier when healthy, but he has struggled to do that. And the Niners love racking up the rushing attempts, so it only stands to reason they’ll keep handing it to Samuel as part of that plan. If nothing else, it’s a guaranteed way to get the ball in the hands of their best player, and that’s always a good thing. — Nick Wagoner


Is there a single player in this offense we can trust right now?

Nope. They’ve scored a combined 13 points in the last two games because Russell Wilson and their passing game have been so off. Wilson continues to say his surgically repaired finger is fine, and his resume over the last decade suggests he’ll snap out of his funk eventually. But who knows when? The closest thing the Seahawks have to a reliable fantasy play right now is Alex Collins, who figures to remain their primary back. But barely getting double-digit touches each week means his ceiling is limited. — Brady Henderson



Read original article here

New York Giants RB Saquon Barkley back with team after false positive COVID-19 tests, but likely to sit vs. Las Vegas Raiders

EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. — New York Giants running back Saquon Barkley and safety Xavier McKinney returned to the team after spending several days away because of false positive COVID-19 tests. They were activated from the reserve/COVID list on Friday morning.

McKinney was at practice and is expected to play Sunday vs. the Las Vegas Raiders. Barkley was in the building but didn’t practice because of an ankle injury that sidelined him the past three games. He is almost certainly going to miss another game in part because the false positives limited his opportunities to get on the field this week.

“A guy who’s been out for several weeks like that, yeah, we’d like to see him on the field and making sure we can assure how he’s moving and get out there and do it safely and stay on the field,” coach Joe Judge said before practice.

The Giants (2-6), who have a bye next week, are expected to get back wide receiver Kenny Golladay (knee) against the Raiders. Golladay also missed the previous three games. He practiced for the first time since the injury on Thursday.

Barkley’s likely absence caps a wild week in which coaches and players were in and out of the building because of false positives. Running back Gary Brightwell remained away from the team Friday as it awaits confirmation that his result was incorrect.

The Giants did have one confirmed positive case, running backs coach Burton Burns, earlier this week. But 12 of 13 positive tests Tuesday were later deemed false. Results for Barkley, McKinney and starting left guard Matt Skura turned out to be false positives on Wednesday, and there were a “good amount” more on Thursday, according to Judge.

Dr. Allen Sills, the NFL’s chief medical officer, said Thursday in an interview with the NFL Network that the league was looking into irregularities with the lab handling the Giants’ testing. The Giants eventually stopped using the rapid tests that kept producing incorrect results.

“Bio-Reference Laboratories (BRL) is experiencing an unusually high number of false positives using the Rapid Mesa Test at our facility. With the exception of one individual, all of the positive Mesa test results over the last two days have come back negative through PCR testing,” the Giants said in a statement on Thursday. “The laboratory is working with experts to determine the source of the problem.

“The NFL and BRL are monitoring this situation closely. We are temporarily halting the use of the Rapid Mesa Test and administering PCR tests only.”

The time lost was still too much for Barkley to overcome. He wasn’t able to rehab the ankle at the facility for several days or get onto the field for practice.

Barkley was at practice working on the side with trainers last week. He did not even get to that point this week because of his false positive, instead spending an inordinate amount of time at home.

“He’s assured us that he’s moving in the right direction,” Judge said. “But again, he’s a very competitive player, he wants to be out there, he wants to be out there competing on the field with his teammates.”

Read original article here