Tag Archives: Royalist

All Prince Harry’s Memoir Revelations ‘Spare’ No One, Including Himself

As read by Tim Teeman, Tom Sykes, Katie Baker, Kevin Fallon, Helen Holmes, Matt Young, Kate Briquelet, Brooke Leigh Howard, Rachel Olding, Danika Fears, Malcolm Jones, Madeline Roth.

Prince Harry opens his memoir, Spare, with a quote from Faulkner: “The past is never dead. It’s not even passed.” However he admits, just a few pages in, that he discovered it “on brainyquote.com.” What follows is a rollercoaster ride of revelations and relentless royal dish.

As well as all that has been divulged in countless articles and leaks already, Harry begins by revealing King Charles in an unfamiliar pose—in boxer shorts at Balmoral, doing headstands.

Harry reveals that he and brother Prince William always bowed to a statue of Queen Victoria on the second floor at Balmoral, having been “told to do so.” A risk of entering a “wrong door” at the Scottish castle was finding his father, “doing his head stands. Prescribed by his physio, these exercises were the only effective remedy for the constant pain in Pa’s neck and back. Old polo injuries, mostly. He performed them daily, in just a pair of boxers, propped against the door, hanging from a bar like a skilled acrobat.”

In an early recognition of his status, Harry says that at Balmoral he and William shared a room, saying William “had the larger half, with a double bed, a good size basin, a cabinet with mirrored doors, a beautiful window looking down on the courtyard, the fountain, the bronze statue of a roe deer buck. My half of the room was far smaller. Less luxurious. I never asked why. I didn’t care. But I also didn’t need to ask. Two years older than me, Willie was the Heir, whereas I was the Spare.”

And so the book begins as it means to go on: a blunt indictment of what Harry sees as his inherently lower position within the royal family that has impacted every part of his life.

He says that on the day of his birth his father told his mother: “Wonderful! Now you’ve given me an Heir and a Spare—my work is done.” Harry says the comment was “presumably” a joke but adds that, “minutes after delivering this bit of high comedy,” his father went off to meet “his girlfriend. So. Many a true word spoken in jest.”

“Emotion. Drama. Pain.”

Harry describes drifting off to sleep on the evening of August 30, 1997, before waking to find his father at the end of his bed, who tells him, “Darling boy, mummy has been in a car crash.” Harry writes, “I remember thinking: crash… Okay. But she’s alright? Yes?”

However his father then says, “There were complications. Mummy was quite badly injured and taken to hospital, darling boy.”

Harry says, “He always called me darling boy but he was saying it quite a lot now. His voice was soft. He was in shock, it seemed.”

Charles finally broke the news of Diana’s death to Harry by saying, “They tried, darling boy. I’m afraid she didn’t make it.”

Harry describes the morning of his mother’s death, saying that the family went to church as usual for a Sunday, but that he can remember very little about it.

After attending a private service at Crathie Church, Royal family stop to look at floral tributes left for Princess Diana, at the gates of Balmoral Castle. They are: Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Philip, Prince Charles, Prince William, Prince Harry, Peter Phillips.

Robert Patterson/Mirrorpix/Getty Images

He says that on the way home, “It was suggested that we stop. People had been gathering all morning outside the front gates, some had begun leaving things. Stuffed animals, flowers, cards. Acknowledgement should be made.”

He says that as he began to hear the “rhythmic clicking” of photographers he reached for his father’s hand, “for comfort,” then “cursed” himself “because that gesture just set off an explosion of clicks. I’ve given them exactly what they wanted. Emotion. Drama. Pain. They fired and fired and fired.”

His hatred of the media is the primary theme of the book, alongside the dysfunction of his own family, and his fractured relations with his father and brother.

As already reported by The Daily Beast, Harry writes about thinking Diana had staged her own death, and—truly alive—she would later be reunited with her two sons.

In a grim detail he says that his aunt Sarah McCorquodale handed him and William “two tiny blue boxes“ which contained Diana’s hair. He writes, “Aunt Sarah explained that, while in Paris, she’d clipped two locks from Mummy’s head. So there it was. Proof. She’s really gone.”

“I wasn’t Camilla’s biggest hurdle”

The seeds of royal rebellion were sown early. Harry’s history teacher at Ludgrove, named Mr. Hughes-Games, admonished Harry for not knowing anything about his family history; Harry also says he didn’t care to know anything about his ancestors.

Harry says Charles never spoke to him about James Hewitt, contrary to many profiles and biographies which say they had a heart-to-heart about the rumor that Hewitt was Harry’s father, which is patently false, Harry says.

Before they were officially introduced to their father’s mistress after Diana went “missing,” Harry says William once bumped into Camilla in the Palace. Harry says during his first formal introduction to Camilla, they were both “calm or bored.” “Neither of us much fretted about the other’s opinion. She wasn’t my mother, and I wasn’t her biggest hurdle. In other words, I wasn’t the Heir.”

In subsequent interviews this week, Harry has called Camilla both a “dangerous” schemer willing to leave “bodies in the street” to secure her royal position, while saying he has “compassion” for her.

Harry reveals Charles has a ratty old teddy bear called Teddy, and that William ignored him as a kid. On a hunting trip to Africa, a guide shoves Harry’s head into the carcass of a dead animal as part of a “blooding ritual.” A close encounter with a leopard in Botswana that passes near to the camp and Harry takes it as a sign from Diana that: “All is well. And all will be well.”

“Rehabber Kooks—infected pustule on the arse of humanity”

Harry talks about Club H, a place he could drink and let his hair down at his dad’s country pile, Highgrove, and of losing his virginity, as has been widely reported.

“Inglorious episode, with an older woman. She liked horses, quite a lot, and treated me not unlike a young stallion. Quick ride, after which she’d smacked my rump and sent me off to graze. Among the many things about it that were wrong: It happened in a grassy field behind a busy pub.”

He reserves particular scorn for one journalist who seems to be dead-set on pursuing him at all costs—anagram “Rehabber Kooks,” who seems very likely to be Rebekah Brooks, former editor of the News of the World and the Sun and now CEO of News UK (and tipped to take over the entire Murdoch empire)as “an infected pustule on the arse of humanity, plus a shit excuse for a journalist.”

Charles and Camilla’s spin doctor decided to collude with Brooks, Harry writes, and throw the teenage Harry under the tabloid bus in order to “bolster the sagging reputation of Pa… No more the unfaithful husband, Pa would now be presented to the world as the harried single dad coping with a drug-addled child.”

The tabloid, Harry says, invented a story that he’d gone to rehab. He was furious when the story landed: “I felt heartbroken at the idea that this had been partly the work of my own family, my own father and future stepmother. They’d abetted this nonsense. For what? To make their own lives a bit easier.”

Diana, Princess Of Wales, holds Prince Harry, Prince William below, and Princess Margaret, left, on Buckingham Palace balcony.

Tim Graham Photo Library via Getty Images

Harry also talks about the late Princess Margaret, another Spare as any Crown fan will remember, watching the powers-that-be separate her and her sister, Queen Elizabeth, early in their lives.

Harry finds “Margo” cold and intimidating with a scowl that could kill any house plant. One Christmas she gave him a biro as a gift. “It wasn’t just any biro, she pointed out. It had a tiny rubber fish wrapped around it… I told myself: That is cold-blooded.”

“Now and then, as I grew older, it struck me that Aunt Margo and I should’ve been friends,” Harry writes. “We had so much in common. Two Spares. Her relationship with Granny wasn’t an exact analogue of mine with Willy, but pretty close. The simmering rivalry, the intense competition (driven largely by the older sibling), it all looked familiar.”

“Cocaine didn’t make me particularly happy”

Harry writes about taking cocaine, and denying to a courtier that he had done so, despite press reports saying he had. “It wasn’t much fun, and it didn’t make me particularly happy as it seemed to make everyone around me, but it did make me feel different, and that was the main goal. Different. I was a deeply unhappy 17-year-old boy willing to try almost anything that would alter the status quo. That was what I told myself anyway. Back then, I could lie to myself as effortlessly as I’d lied to that courtier.”

Harry outlines his struggle to find purpose; he was not academic (saying the press cast him as “Prince Thicko”), and by “process of elimination” decided on the army as a career. He worked on a farm in Australia until the tabloids discovered him there, and then—on returning home—slept with a “page-three girl” (the famed topless models of the Sun) which led to more “nauseating,” snobbish press coverage.

His girlfriend Chelsy Davy “seemed immune to that common affliction sometimes called throne syndrome. It was similar to the effect that actors and musicians have on people, except with actors and musicians, the root cause is talent. I had no talent‚ so I’d been told, again and again—and thus all reactions to me had nothing to do with me. They were down to my family, my title, and consequently, they always embarrassed me, because they were so unearned. I’d always wanted to know what it might be like to meet a woman and not have her eyes widen at the mention of my title, but instead to widen them myself, using my mind, my heart. With Chelsy that seemed a real possibility…she was remarkably incurious.”

“Camilla sacrificed me on her personal PR altar”

Harry writes that he welcomed Charles and Camilla’s announcement they would marry, even if the ceremony was delayed. “Other than feeling sorry for them, I couldn’t help but think that some force in the universe (Mummy?) was blocking rather than blessing their union. Maybe the universe delays what it disapproves of?”

Still, “when the wedding did finally take place—without Granny, who chose not to attend—it was almost cathartic for everyone, even me…I did sneak several long peeks at the groom and the bride and each time I thought: Good for you. Though, also: Goodbye. I knew without question that this marriage would take Pa away from us…I didn’t relish losing a second parent, and I had complex feelings about gaining a step-parent who, I believed, had recently sacrificed me on her personal PR altar. But I saw Pa’s smile and it was hard to argue with that, and harder still to deny the cause: Camilla. I wanted so many things, but I was surprised to discover at their wedding that one of the things I wanted most, still, was for my father to be happy. In a funny way I even wanted Camilla to be happy. Maybe she’d be less dangerous if she was happy?”

Please, put me on a battlefield where there are clear rules of engagement. Where there’s some sense of honor.

Prince Harry

Harry goes on to write about things already leaked and reported—his Nazi costume, allegedly greenlit and encouraged by William and Kate, and seeing photographs of his dead mother taken—as well as his army career, and ongoing paranoia he and William had about who was leaking stories about them to the press. Harry said he would rather be in a warzone than in Fleet Street’s sights. “What a relief it will be, I thought, to be in a proper war zone, where none of this is part of my daily calculus. Please, put me on a battlefield where there are clear rules of engagement. Where there’s some sense of honor.”

Prince Harry (R) speaks with RAF personnel during his visit to RAF Honington on July 14, 2010 in Suffolk, easten England.

Ben Stansall – WPA Pool/Getty Images

As it was, fighting in Iraq, Harry writes about himself becoming a target for insurgents to kidnap, torture, or kill. Upon returning to Britain, his partying became extreme, and the ever-present paparazzi he compared to Iraqi insurgents. “The paps had always been grotesque people, but as I reached maturity they were worse. You could see it in their eyes, their body language. They were more emboldened, more radicalized, just as young men in Iraq had been radicalized. Their mullahs were editors…”

As has been reported, William and Harry went to where their mother died in Paris.

Harry writes about finding purpose in Africa, of meeting people in real need “humbling” him, and of his frostbitten penis, as a result of Arctic travels just before Prince William’s wedding to Kate Middleton. The Sussex todger is still icy and painful during the ceremony. Harry is also massively hungover and freaked out being back at Westminster Abbey where his mother’s funeral service was. He can’t look at any of his nearest and dearest in case he bursts into tears.

Harry: I was Chandler in ‘Friends’

Late summer of 2013, Harry was having “terrifying panic attacks” and lethargy. Putting on a suit in the morning would trigger the panic attacks. He began to fear “all public venues” and started staying at home. He watched a lot of Friends and decided he was “a Chandler.”

He loved the show. Describing his bachelor lifestyle, he writes he did his own laundry, and folded his underwear while watching the show. For his everyday clothes he went to T.K. Maxx, liked Gap and J Crew.

He writes that he stopped going out in 2015, but still watched Friends, then would smoke a joint and go to bed early. “Solitary life. Strange life. I felt lonely, but lonely was panicky. … I was an agoraphobe.”

One therapist said he was suffering from post-traumatic stress, and that rang a bell. He also started meditating and taking psychedelics. “I’d experimented with them over the years, for fun, but now I’d begun to use them therapeutically, medicinally.”

NBCU Photo Bank/NBCUniversal via Getty Images via Getty Images

In 2016 he went back to America and ended up staying at Courteney Cox’s house, who was a friend of a friend. Was thrilled “as a Friends fanatic.” But, “She was Monica. And I was a Chandler. I wondered if I’d ever work up the courage to tell her. Was there enough tequila in California to get me that brave?”

During a party at Cox’s, he met an actor from Batman (but doesn’t say who). At that party, he took mushrooms and washed them down with tequila. This is the bathroom shrooms story where the toilet became a head. The next day, there was another party with more tequila and more mushrooms. He ended the night by staring at the moon, which was speaking to him and telling him that “the year ahead would be good” and that there would be “something special” and “big.”

Maybe even someone who would be there for him, when the rain starts to pour.

“The King lived here, you say? Really?”

The book is intriguing as a kind of inside report on incidents that became such well-known tabloid fodder. Harry writes about the infamous time in Las Vegas where he was photographed nude after a wild night out. His “sense of guilt and shame made it hard at moments to draw a clean breath.” He fled to Balmoral, where his dad was “gentle” and “bemused” about it. Harry was relieved his bodyguards weren’t fired over it.

Deployed in Afghanistan, after he kills motorbike-riding Taliban soldiers, a friend asks, “Did it factor into your feeling that these killers were on motorbikes? The chosen vehicle of paps all over the world.” He “couldn’t say” that “not one particle” of him was thinking about the bikes that chased him, and “one Mercedes into a Paris tunnel.”

As has been reported, Harry killed 25 people while deployed. “It wasn’t a number that gave me any satisfaction. But neither was it a number that made me feel ashamed.” “They were chess pieces removed from the board, Bads taken away before they could kill Goods.” His questions about the war were never moral and the only shots he thought twice about were the ones he “hadn’t taken.”

Harry credits ex Cressida Bonas with performing “a miracle, opening me up, releasing suppressed emotions” during their relationship.

Damn, I thought. She helped me cry. And now I’m leaving her in tears.

Prince Harry

One night she asked about his mother. “Her tone was just the right blend of curiosity and compassion.” Harry started crying and told her, “This is the first time I’ve been able to cry about my mum since the burial… She was the first person to help me across that barrier, to help me unleash the tears. It was cathartic, it accelerated our bond, and added an element rare in past relationships: immense gratitude. I was indebted to Cress, and that was the reason why, when we got home from Kazakhstan, I felt so miserable, because at some point during that ski trip I’d realized that we weren’t a match.” He drove over to see Cress and broke up with her. “Damn, I thought. She helped me cry. And now I’m leaving her in tears.”

On a trip to America for his friend Guy Pelly’s wedding. Harry toured Graceland and was super-unimpressed. “Dark, claustrophobic. I walked around saying: The King lived here, you say? Really?”

The wedding made him think, “When’s it going to be my turn? The one person who might want it most, to be married, to have a family, and it’s never going to happen. More than a little petulantly, I thought: It’s just not fair of the universe.”

Prince William, Duke of Cambridge and Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge attend a Christmas Party for families and children of deployed personnel from RAF Coningsby and RAF Marham serving in Cyprus, at Kensington Palace on December 4, 2018 in London, England.

Mark Cuthbert/UK Press via Getty Images

Having left the army to be a full-time royal, Harry read the stories of William being lazy “which was obscene, grossly unfair, because he was busy having children and raising a family.”

“He did as much as Pa wanted him to do, and sometimes that wasn’t much, because Pa and Camilla didn’t want Willy and Kate getting loads of publicity. Pa and Camilla didn’t like Willy and Kate drawing attention away from them or their causes. They’d openly scolded Willy about it many times. Willy told me that both he and Kate felt trapped, and unfairly persecuted, by the press and by Pa and Camilla.”

Kate and William were big fans of “Suits”

Harry says he and Meghan began messaging each other on July 1, 2016—what would have been his mom’s 55th birthday. In their meet, which Harry writes about suitably cutely, he talks about traveling to Africa together, a freaky moment where his phone is bust and he is not able to contact her, and Will and Kate’s shock when Harry reveals he is dating Meghan.

They “explained that they were regular—nay, religious—viewers of Suits. They barraged me with questions…overall what I told them was heavily redacted. I just didn’t want to give away too much. I also said I couldn’t wait for them to meet her, that I looked forward to the four of us spending lots of time together, and I confessed, for the umpteenth time, that this had long been my dream—to join them with an equal partner. To become a foursome. I’d said this to Willy so many times and he’d always reply: ‘It might not happen, Harold! And you’ve got to be OK with that.’ Now I felt that it was going to happen, and I told him so—but he still said to slow down. ‘She’s an American actress after all, Harold. Anything might happen.’ I nodded, a bit hurt. Then hugged him and Kate and left.”

SUITS — Season 1 — Pictured: (l-r) Gina Torres as Jessica Pearson, Rick Hoffmann as Louis Litt, Meghan Markle as Rachel Zane, Gabriel Macht as Harvey Specter, Patrick Adams as Mike Ross.

Frank Ockenfels/USA/NBCU Photo Bank/NBCUniversal via Getty Images

Meghan meets Queen Elizabeth very early, does a flawless curtsey, declines to discuss Donald Trump, and scores major points when she says she’s been working in Canada— part of the Commonwealth. Meghan also meets William, hugs him, freaks him out. Both William and Charles are furious when Harry issues a statement decrying racism, sexism and harassment in the initial media coverage and online comment around Meghan. “Pa and Willy were furious. They gave me an earful. My statement made them look bad, they both said. Because they’d never put out a statement for their girlfriends or wives when they were being harassed.”

Harry reveals he warned Meghan before she took a trip to India for World Vision that she shouldn’t take a photo in front of the Taj Mahal. “I’d explained that my mother had posed for a photo there, and it had become iconic, and I didn’t want anyone thinking Meg was trying to mimic my mother. Meg had never heard of this photo, and found the whole thing baffling.”

Kate: “I know, Meghan, that I was the one that made you cry”

In the run-up to the wedding, Kate and Meghan fell out over what has become an endless saga of who said what about bridesmaid dresses.

Post-wedding, Harry conveys an image of them being hunted by the media, and frozen out by the family, although Meghan tells him of her first joint engagement with the queen: “We bonded! The queen and I really bonded! We talked about how much I wanted to be a mum and she told me the best way to induce labour was a good bumpy car ride! I told her I’d remember that when the time came.”

There are excruciating meetings where Harry and Meghan and Kate and William try to get their relationship back on track. William and Kate are upset that they did not receive Easter presents from Harry and Meghan.

Harry perceptively notes: “None of this airing of grievances was doing us any good, I felt. We weren’t getting anywhere.”

Had it actually come to this? Shouting at each other about place cards and hormones?

Prince Harry

Kate tells Meghan she owes her an apology over Meghan saying she may have “baby brain”: “You hurt my feelings Meghan… I told you I couldn’t remember something and you told me it was my hormones… We’re not close enough for you to talk about my hormones.”

As has been reported William told Meghan she was being “rude,” and Meghan told him not to point at her.

“Was this really happening?” Harry writes. “Had it actually come to this? Shouting at each other about place cards and hormones?”

Harry does not address the bullying allegations against Meghan directly, but says, “Team Cambridge versus Team Sussex took shape,” with “rivalry, and competing agendas poisoning the atmosphere… Nerves were shattering, people were sniping… more than once a staff member slumped across their desk and wept.”

l to r: Prince William, Duke of Cambridge, Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex and Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex arrive to attend Christmas Day Church service at Church of St Mary Magdalene on the Sandringham estate on December 25, 2018 in King’s Lynn, England.

Stephen Pond/Getty Images

When the story breaks that Meghan made Kate cry over the bridesmaid dresses, Meghan says to her husband, “Haz, I made her cry? I made HER cry?” In December 2018, at another “summit” between the couples, Kate allegedly says to Meghan: “I know, Meghan, that I was the one that made you cry.”

Meghan asked what was being done to correct the story in public.

Harry writes that he realized that nothing would be done: nothing could “happen to embarrass the future queen.” William confesses that he told Charles and Camilla about the beef between the couples, and although it is not stated the unspoken source of the leak is implied to be him or Camilla.

“I was a stranger to my older brother”

In January 2019, Harry recalls Meghan saying she felt suicidal, then a letter she wrote to her father was leaked to the Mail, Harry watching his wife’s mood deteriorate even further. William visited, and shoves him—now infamously—on to the dog bowl. There is joy when Archie is born, with Harry transfixed by the miracle of life.

There is more joy when the couple go to chill at Elton John and David Furnish’s home in the South of France, until Elton tells Harry that the Daily Mail will serialize his memoir, pointing out, “I want people to read it!” Harry is furious that Elton is dealing with “the very people who’ve made your life miserable,” but then says he will always love Elton.

Back home, Harry does battle with three terrifying-sounding courtiers, nicknamed the Bee, the Fly, and the Wasp, who he sees as scheming for ever more control around an ailing queen. Harry then launched three lawsuits against British newspapers, which his family does not not support.

The queen and Charles called an emergency meeting with Harry, the Bee, and the Wasp to confront him for making their relationship with the media “complicated” because of the lawsuits. Harry reminded them many family members, the queen included, had sued the press. Why was this different? Plus, he and Meghan had been asking for their protection constantly, and they did nothing to help. “You’re doing a disservice to yourselves by not protecting my wife.”

William and Harry viciously fight by text, with William accusing Harry of being “brainwashed” by therapy. “I was a stranger to my older brother,” Harry writes.

Next came a briefly blissful sojourn to Vancouver Island, Canada, until the media found Harry and Meghan—although the experience, Harry says, gave him and Meghan an opportunity to see life outside the royal fishbowl. The idea of leaving their royal roles was born.

Exit strategy

Harry describes in great detail the alleged skullduggery and briefing and leaking against him and Meghan planning their royal exit. Finally, he recalls the “Sandringham Summit” that played out with the world’s media agog at every machination. Harry writes that the queen, Charles, William, the Bee, and the Wasp were all at the meeting. William was annoyed that he was being accused in the papers of bullying Harry and Meghan out of the family.

There were five options, Harry writes. Option 1 was the status quo. Option 5 was full severance from the family, royal duties, and security. Retaining security was paramount to Harry, to prevent “another untimely death.” Everyone Harry had consulted recommended Option 3: living elsewhere part of the year, continuing their work, and retaining security. The family pushed for Option 1, and said, barring that, they’d only accept Option 5. They had even already drafted an Option 5 statement to the public, without consulting Harry, he writes.

For Harry, keeping security was paramount, especially given the viciousness of what had been said against Meghan.

Chris Jackson/Getty Images

The Palace head of security told Harry that the threat level for them “was still higher for that of nearly every other royal, equal to that assigned the Queen.” As Harry trying to figure out hiring his own security, the Palace directed him to a firm that quoted him a price of “six million a year.”

In the midst of all this, Harry’s old friend/ex Caroline Flack took her own life. “She couldn’t stand it any more, apparently. The relentless abuse at the hands of the press, year after year. I felt so awful for her family. I remembered how they’d all suffered for her mortal sin of going out with me.”

The reason Tyler Perry offered them his house to stay in during the pandemic was “my mother,” Perry told them in a FaceTime call. “My mother loved your mother.” After Diana visited Harlem, “She could do no wrong in Maxine Perry’s book.”

That was everything…That is a man…My love. That is not a Spare.

Meghan Markle

In the house, Archie became obsessed with a painting of a scene from ancient Rome. Finally, after Archie kept staring at it, Meghan noticed the nameplate on the frame: “Goddess of the hunt. Diana.” When they moved to their Santa Barbara house after the press discovered they were at Tyler Perry’s, the move only took hours. “Everything we owned fit in 13 suitcases.”

After Meghan suffered her miscarriage, in the midst of the stress of preparing for the tabloid trial, they buried their unborn child in a tiny package under a banyan tree.

The brothers, as has been widely reported, had another physical altercation after Prince Philip’s funeral.

After their daughter Lilibet was born and they were home, Meghan told Harry that she’s never been more in love with him. She jotted notes in a journal that she showed him: “She said: That was everything…She said: That is a man…My love. She said: That is not a Spare.”

And that moment of cheer—after hundreds of pages of tumult—is the last line of the book.

Read original article here

Queen Elizabeth Had Cancer Before She Died, New Book Claims

Welcome to this week’s edition of Royalist, The Daily Beast’s newsletter for all things royal and Royal Family. Subscribe here to get it in your inbox every Sunday.

Queen died while suffering from cancer, author says

Queen Elizabeth was suffering through cancer in the last months of her life, according to well-connected author Gyles Brandreth. Brandreth, in his new book Elizabeth: An Intimate Portrait—as reported by the Daily Mailwrites: “I had heard that the queen had a form of myeloma—bone marrow cancer—which would explain her tiredness and weight loss and those ‘mobility issues’ we were often told about during the last year or so of her life.

“The most common symptom of myeloma is bone pain, especially in the pelvis and lower back, and multiple myeloma is a disease that often affects the elderly. Currently, there is no known cure, but treatment—including medicines to help regulate the immune system and drugs that help prevent the weakening of the bones—can reduce the severity of its symptoms and extend the patient’s survival by months or two to three years.” (The queen’s death certificate recorded that she had died of old age.)

In the days preceding her death on September 8, 2022, Brandreth writes that the queen had Sunday lunch with the Right Reverend Dr Iain Greenshields, the vicar of the local Braemar and Crathie Parish Church. “They talk about the queen’s childhood, her horses, church affairs (she is ‘well up to speed’) and her sadness at what is happening in Ukraine.” She also spoke to Clive Cox, one of her favorite racehorse trainers, as well as meeting at Balmoral an outgoing Prime Minister (Boris Johnson) and anointing a new one (Liz Truss, whose tenure ended up being the shortest of any prime minister).

On that day, a last poignant picture of the queen was taken.

Queen Elizabeth II waits in the Drawing Room before receiving newly elected leader of the Conservative party Liz Truss at Balmoral Castle for an audience where she will be invited to become Prime Minister and form a new government on September 6, 2022 in Aberdeen, Scotland.

Jane Barlow – WPA Pool/Getty Images

Brandreth also says he does not believe that the queen was, as reported, at Prince Philip’s bedside when he died in April 2021.

“That morning, he went to the bathroom, helped by a nurse. When he came back, he said he felt a little faint and wanted help getting back into bed. The nurse called the Duke’s valet and the queen’s page, Paul Whybrew, for help—and he died before the queen could be called,” Brandreth writes. He adds that the couple would go “weeks” without seeing each other later in their lives, the queen recognizing that Philip did not want to be “fussed over.” The pandemic bought them back into close living quarters again, and they both enjoyed it, Brandreth said.

In a second extract, reported the Mail, Brandreth said the queen had liked Meghan Markle, and did “everything to make her feel welcome” into the family. The queen was “devoted” to Harry, but thought he was “perhaps a little too in-love” with Meghan. Brandreth said the queen told Meghan: “You can carry on being an actress if you like—that’s your profession, after all.” On the bombshells told by the couple to Oprah Winfrey, the queen was more concerned with Harry’s well-being rather than “this television nonsense,” as she allegedly called it.

Even more fabulously, when Prince Andrew whined about the Oprah interview, the queen reminded him of the time his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson gave an interview to Oprah.

While other family members found it “bewildering” that Harry and Meghan named their daughter Lilibet, as a tribute to the queen’s nickname, the queen said it was “pretty and seems just right.” Brandreth also says that courtiers refer to Harry and Meghan as “persons who live overseas.”

Kirsty O’Connor – WPA Pool/Getty Images

The battle of the royals lands on the east coast

It may not be the rumble in the jungle, but America is about to host another juicy fight. The Telegraph reports that Prince William and Kate Middleton “won’t be distracted,” and are feeling bullish about their three-day trip to North America this week beginning Wednesday, ahead of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s appearance at a ritzy New York awards ceremony to receive an award after they leave.

“The Palace team are highly cognizant of Meghan and Harry, but equally, they’re not scared of their shadows on this,” a royal source told the Telegraph. “William is the future king. Harry has taken his path, she’s doing her podcast, they’ve got their issues, but the palace isn’t going to run scared of that, so kudos to them.”

It’s not bad to receive an award, but it shows the fundamental difference between [William and Kate]—who have constitutional roles, who are working on behalf of others—versus being a celebrity.

Source to Page Six

William and Kate were last in America in 2014, on a trip to New York. He reportedly wants the splashiness of coming stateside to maximize publicity for the Earthshot Prize, which will be held in Boston where the Cambridges are basing their charm offensive. “America is your best chance of projecting it internationally,” a source told the Telegraph. “That was the logic behind wanting to do it in Boston.”

Another source told Page Six: “It’s not bad to receive an award, but it shows the fundamental difference between [William and Kate]—who have constitutional roles, who are working on behalf of others—versus being a celebrity. They were always famous, but now they’re reached a different stage in their public lives—they’re different types of figures.”

Harry and Meghan will receive an award at the Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights Foundation Ripple of Hope Gala in New York.

Kerry Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy’s daughter and president of the foundation, recently told El Confidencial’s Vanitatis magazine that the award was for their “heroic” stance against the “structural racism” of the royal family. “They went to the oldest institution in UK history and told them what they were doing wrong, that they couldn’t have structural racism within the institution; that they could not maintain a misunderstanding about mental health… Few would have the courage to question their colleagues, family and community about the power structure they maintained, and this is what Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have done.”

Princess Charlotte of Wales.

Chris Jackson/Getty Images

Charlotte beats Edward to Edinburgh title

King Charles is saving the title Duchess of Edinburgh for Princess Charlotte, Prince William and Kate Middleton’s daughter, the Mail on Sunday reports. This means the title of Duke of Edinburgh won’t go to Prince Edward as had once been anticipated.

A source told the paper: “Discussions are under way, but the favored outcome for the King is that this title ought to go to Princess Charlotte. ‘It would be a fitting way to remember the queen—who, of course, had the title Duchess of Edinburgh—and a way for His Majesty to honor the line of succession.”

Charlotte’s position is historically significant because she is the first female member of the royal family whose place in the line of succession will not be surpassed by her younger brother.

Source to the Mail

Charlotte is third in line to the throne, after her dad and brother Prince George—the rules of royal primogeniture were changed to allow a girl born to the couple the same rights as a boy when Kate was pregnant with Charlotte.

A source said: “Charlotte’s position is historically significant because she is the first female member of the royal family whose place in the line of succession will not be surpassed by her younger brother. So, it is constitutionally significant that Charlotte should be given such a corresponding title, because it is not beyond the realms of possibility that she will accede the throne if, for example, Prince George does not have children.”

Perhaps Edward isn’t that surprised; the lack of movement on the title being bestowed upon him “had not gone unnoticed,” a source told the Mail. Now, Charles is reportedly trying to figure out which title to give him. “It shows you what the King is thinking,” a source told the Mail of the Charlotte move. “It’s about promoting those directly in line to the throne rather than those on the edges.”

Subscribe here to get all the latest royal news and gossip with Tom Sykes and Tim Teeman.

Harry: excellent lover, excellent bacon sandwich skills

Catherine, aka Cat, Ommaney, who was one of the stars of the ill-fated Bravo show, The Real Housewives of D.C., has come forward to dish once more on her claims to have had a month-long affair with Prince Harry in 2006, when he was 21 and she 34. It was, she says, “the time of my life.”

Ommaney first spoke of the affair in 2006, but told the Sun that she was dishing again because she didn’t expect the relationship to feature in Harry’s own, much-anticipated memoir, Spare.

“I doubt I will be in Harry’s book as a prince can’t run off with a 34-year-old mother-of-two, it’s just not the done thing, Ommaney told the paper. She was separated from ex-husband Stephen when she and Harry met in a trendy bar in London’s Chelsea in May 2006. At the time, he was dating Chelsy Davy, but Ommaney said she wasn’t sure of they were together at the time.

Prince Harry and his then-girlfriend Chelsy Davy attend the Cartier International Polo match at the Guards Polo Club on 30 July, 2006 in Egham, England.

MJ Kim/Getty Images

Ommaney says: “Harry was wearing an Australian-style hat that made me laugh so I asked him, ‘What are you doing looking like a t*** in that?’ I don’t think he was used to people taking the Mickey and once we started talking, it was like there was no one else was in the room,” Ommaney said. “He was only 21 so a relationship was the furthest thing from my mind. But when everyone started leaving at around 11pm, Harry pointed to one of three Range Rovers parked outside and said, ‘Hop in with me,’ which I found very flattering.

“We were driven to Eclipse nightclub in South Kensington and whisked downstairs to the VIP area. A few moments later the manager came over and asked, ‘What is your favorite song?’ Harry said, ‘Gnarls Barkley, Crazy.’ It came on a second later and I said, ‘You are so spoiled.’ Harry just laughed.”

He gave me the most incredible, passionate kiss I have ever had in my life. I was absolutely speechless

Catherine Ommaney

Later in the evening, Ommaney told Harry, “‘I’m starving, do you make a good bacon sandwich?’ He said, ‘I make an excellent bacon sandwich’ and we went back to his friend’s place in Chelsea.”

True to his word on his bacon sandwich-making skills, later Harry “lifted me by my waist off the floor and held me against the wall. He gave me the most incredible, passionate kiss I have ever had in my life. I was absolutely speechless,” said Ommaney.

When the tabloids got wind of the relationship, all communication ceased until they bumped into each other at a polo match in Barbados—because rich people. “Harry pushed past his bodyguards to give me a kiss and a hug and we had a great conversation. In hindsight it’s a shame we couldn’t have remained friends,” Ommaney said.

“If Harry walked through the door here now, he would probably give me a high five and I am sure we will meet again, because the world is a small place. I hope he is happy and has found some freedom finally, because that is something he was desperately searching for back then. I hope Meghan looks after him and I don’t wish him anything other than happiness and success because he is a very brave, charismatic, incredibly funny, intelligent and lovely human being.”

Andrew angry at axing of his police guard

Prince Andrew is set to formally complain after learning his taxpayer-funded police guard is going to be axed. The security costs £3 million ($3.6 million) a year. A source told the Sun on Sunday: “He is going to write to the Home Office and the Met Police to complain about losing his taxpayer-funded security.”

Andrew was stripped of his official royal duties earlier this year in the wake of the Jeffrey Epstein/Virginia Roberts Giuffre scandal. Giuffre claimed Andrew sexually assaulted her three times when she was underage and being sexually trafficked by Epstein. Andrew denied this, but later paid her millions of dollars in an out-of-court settlement.

Camilla, Queen Consort attends QIPCO British Champions Day at Ascot Racecourse on October 15, 2022 in Ascot, England.

Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty Images

Ladies-in-waiting—out, ‘Companions’—in

Queen Camilla’s six “companions” have been revealed by the Sunday Times, replacing the traditional role of royal ladies-in-waiting. The latter were with the queen most of the time; Camilla’s will only accompany her to “a few key events each year,” the paper says. They are the Marchioness of Lansdowne, the Hon Lady (Katharine) Brooke, Jane von Westenholz, Sarah Troughton, Lady Sarah Keswick and Baroness “Carlyn” Chisholm.

“Several of them are expected to join the Queen in their new roles for the first time at Buckingham Palace on Tuesday, when Camilla will host a high-profile reception raising awareness of violence against women and girls,” the Times says.

A senior royal source told the paper: “The Queen Consort did not want or need ladies-in-waiting and the queen’s companions will have a different role. They are there to provide Her Majesty with support and company. At the end of a very busy day, it is nice to have a longstanding friend beside you.”

This week in royal history

This week in 2020, the queen was reportedly trying to figure out which royals she could safely spend that Christmas with, because of strict COVID lockdown rules. In the end, the queen and Prince Philip spent December 25 privately at Windsor Castle, the first time in more than 30 years that she was not with her family at the Sandringham estate.

Unanswered questions

So, who will win this week’s American east coast royal grudge match for pictures and column inches? First up, it’s Will and Kate in Boston; then Harry and Meghan in New York. Let the silent war of glassy smiles commence.

Love The Daily Beast’s royal coverage? Sign up here to get Royalist newsletters sent straight to your inbox.

Read original article here

Prince Harry, Prince William, and King Charles Are Still Feuding, Not Reuniting

Royalist is The Daily Beast’s newsletter for all things royal and Royal Family. Subscribe here to get it in your inbox every Sunday.

That Queen Elizabeth’s funeral was so intricately planned for decades in advance that it would run like clockwork has long been a cliché of British Establishment life.

Operation London Bridge, as the overarching plan has always been known, began to be sketched out from the first days of her reign in the 1950s.

Yet on Thursday evening, less than four days before the most important state occasion seen in Britain in living memory, with the greatest assemblage of foreign heads of state the world has ever known due to take place on British soil, the plans descended into a fancy dress farce as it appeared that Prince Harry had prevailed in an acrimonious row about whether or not he should be allowed to wear his military uniform during at least some of the ceremonies.

The Daily Mirror’s respected royal correspondent Russell Myers reported that Harry will now be allowed to wear his regimental Blues and Royals uniform to a special vigil for the queen on Saturday.

Myers’ quoted “a royal source” as saying: “Common sense has prevailed. It was a ludicrous situation given the Duke of Sussex has served his country and is a highly respected member of the armed forces with everything he has done for veterans.”

Britain’s Prince Harry (L), Duke of Sussex, and Britain’s Prince William (R), Prince of Wales, reacts as the coffin of Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II arrives at the Palace of Westminster, following a procession from Buckingham Palace, in London on September 14, 2022.

ALKIS KONSTANTINIDIS/POOL/AFP via Getty Images

It will be interesting to see how Harry plays this victory over the establishment. But one suspects that it is somewhat Pyrrhic and will do little to assuage his irritation and anger at what he sees as the institutionalized cruelty of the palace that, as recently as Wednesday, essentially sought to belittle him and advertise his outcast status by not allowing him to wear a military uniform or offer a royal salute to the queen while processing behind her coffin in London.

For their part, the royals remain nervous about the contents of Harry’s memoir, whether decorum means its publication has been delayed or not. The family feud is on, no matter how many carefully choreographed royal appearances raise hopes of a reconciliation between Harry and Prince William.

Prince William, Kate Middleton, Prince Harry, and Meghan Markle seen inside the Palace of Westminster during the lying-in-state of Queen Elizabeth II on Sept. 14.

Christopher Furlong/Getty

“Nothing has really changed,” a family friend of the royals tells The Daily Beast in response to an inquiry about the true state of relations between Prince Harry on one side and his brother and the rest of his family of origin on the other. “The expectation is that once the mourning period is up, Harry and Meghan will go back to California, he will publish his book, and the family here will be left to pick up the pieces.”

Another source told The Daily Beast that there was still “intense” concern among the royal family about Harry’s book containing highly damaging revelations about his father. The source added that while the palace believes it can brush off attacks from Meghan, who is largely discredited in U.K. media that have pounced on a string of inaccuracies in her various interviews—many of her supporters put this media animus down to racism—an attack by his son on King Charles would have a completely different level of credibility. It would be the ultimate insider takedown.

The palace has, previously, tried to portray Harry’s ban from wearing uniform as a practical, legal matter.

For those not up to date on the arcana of British dress codes, legally in the U.K. only active serving members of the army are allowed to wear uniform. When Harry left the royal family, he was forced to resign his honorary military roles. It is those roles that technically grant membership of the armed services to other royals. Edward, for example, may have flunked out on training after four months for a career in the theater, but is commodore-in-chief of the Royal Fleet Auxiliary.

There was general amazement when it turned out that Prince Andrew, he of the sex-case settlement, would be allowed to wear his uniform (vice-admiral, in case you are wondering) to a vigil for the queen on Saturday. The palace said this was as a “special mark of respect to the queen.”

Questions as to why Harry would not be allowed to pay a similar mark of respect, especially as he hadn’t paid millions of dollars to a woman accusing him of raping her, naturally occurred—not least, one assumes, to Harry himself, who was forced to issue a statement which said, rather testily: “Prince Harry will wear a morning suit throughout events honoring his grandmother. His decade of military service is not determined by the uniform he wears and we respectfully ask that focus remain on the life and legacy of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.”

Now, however, after public disbelief (and, quite possibly private lobbying by Harry and his supporters) comes that most un-kingly of things—a political U-turn. It turns out that is in the gift of the monarch to change the rules about army uniforms and who may wear them. As the head of the army, not to mention the state, this is not a huge surprise.

First came the filmed pen-based temper tantrums, then the firing of 100 staff while the queen’s body was hardly cold; now, the chaotic unspooling of the funerary dress code represents yet another significant blow to King Charles’ attempts to portray himself as a safe pair of hands.

There is, of course, a possibility that Harry will have to delay the publication of his book, not least to acknowledge the death of the queen, but no-one is expecting it to be canceled on the basis of King Charles remarking: “I want also to express my love for Harry and Meghan as they continue to build their lives overseas”—or this chaotic U-turn to allow him to wear uniform.

Prince William and Prince Harry walk behind the coffin during the procession for the lying-in-state of Queen Elizabeth II on Sept. 14.

Chris Jackson/Getty

The feud won’t be so easily undone.

The royals are no doubt delighted that news feeds have been swamped with reconciliation stories. But step back a pace and ask what has really happened? Well, one admittedly uncharitable way of looking at it is that Harry and William have managed to breathe the same air on two very carefully curated occasions.

You could have cut the atmosphere with a knife, but, luckily, neither brother was armed.

But the temperature at Windsor on Saturday when the two brothers appeared with their wives for an impromptu walkabout was well below zero. They couldn’t even bring each other to look each other in the eyes, let alone put a fraternal arm around one another’s shoulder.

You could have cut the atmosphere with a knife, but luckily neither brother was armed.

The alacrity with which William laid claim to the title of peacemaker in the wake of the appearance is likely to have annoyed Harry. Sources in William’s camp were telling reporters that the joint appearance was William’s initiative even as the engagement was happening.

Catherine, Princess of Wales, Prince William, Prince of Wales, Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex meet members of the public on the long Walk at Windsor Castle on Sept. 10, 2022, in Windsor, England.

Kirsty O’Connor/WPA Pool/Getty

On Wednesday, as the two brothers processed behind the queen’s coffin, they were side by side but a world apart.

Harry performed his duty admirably. He showed no emotion, other than sadness at the queen’s death when he dabbed at his eyes while standing behind William in Westminster Hall.

If the story about Harry’s uniform U-turn is confirmed, and the palace has not responded to The Daily Beast’s request for comment, huge pressure will build for Harry to be allowed to wear his uniform to the funeral as well.

The trouble that the palace faces now, if it tries to maintain the ban on Harry wearing uniform to the funeral on Monday, is obvious. Charles’ own actions will have given the lie to the argument that it is, sadly, not constitutionally possible.

The tantalizing possibility of Harry wearing uniform to the funeral itself would be a huge victory for him—and an utter humiliation for his father, the new king, entirely of his own making..



Read original article here

Prince Harry Told Meghan Markle ‘I Lost My Dad’ in the Process of Exiting Royal Family

Prince Harry told his wife Meghan Markle he “lost” his father as a byproduct of their acrimonious move away from the British royal family.

Meghan made the stunning declaration in a lengthy interview with New York magazine’s The Cut that was published Monday.

Asked by interviewer Allison P. Davis about her relationship with her own estranged father, Meghan tells Davis: “Harry said to me, ‘I lost my dad in this process.’ It doesn’t have to be the same for them as it was for me, but that’s his decision.”

In the interview, Meghan also goes all-in criticizing the racism of the British media, saying: “Why would I give the very people that are calling my children the N-word a photo of my child before I can share it with the people that love my child?… You tell me how that makes sense and then I’ll play that game.”

In the piece, which Meghan gave to promote her new Archetypes podcast, the duchess also reveals she is planning a return to social media, saying: “I’m getting back… on Instagram.”

Much of the interview was conducted at royals’ home in Montecito, California, which, Meghan says, they initially decided not to consider because they couldn’t afford it. That changed when they signed a reported $25 million Spotify deal and a reported $100 million Netflix deal.

She says that one of the things that attracted to her house were two giant palm trees on the front lawn, saying: “One of the first things my husband saw when we walked around the house was those two palm trees… See how they’re connected at the bottom? He goes, ‘My love, it’s us.’ And now every day when Archie goes by us, he says, ‘Hi, Momma. Hi, Papa.’ ”

Harry makes a few walk-on appearances in the interview, at one stage talking about the need to fix the plumbing in the house.

In another part, Davis visits their “shared home office” and Harry says: “Most people that I know and many of my family, they aren’t able to work and live together.”

Davis writes that Harry “enunciates family with a vocal eye roll.”

She adds that the couple denies they are doing a “reality show,” but then quotes Meghan saying: “The piece of my life I haven’t been able to share, that people haven’t been able to see, is our love story.”

Asked if what “they are currently filming is a documentary about their love story,” Meghan replies: “What’s so funny is I’m not trying to be cagey… I don’t read any press. So I don’t know what’s confirmed… When the media has shaped the story around you, it’s really nice to be able to tell your own story.”

Asked if Harry “feels isolated” being far from his family, Meghan replies: “Well, look, we’re both building community… I didn’t have friends up here.”

She adds of herself and Harry: “We’re like salt and pepper. We always move together.”

The interview also trails future contributors to the Archetypes podcast saying the “labels” that will be explored include: Old Maid, Dragon Lady, Bimbo, Crazy, Angry Black Woman and Bitch. Guests will include Constance Wu, Issa Rae, Lisa Ling, Margaret Cho, and Ziwe.

Meghan also discusses returning to their former home, Frogmore Cottage in Windsor, earlier this summer during the queen’s jubilee festivities, saying: “You go back and you open drawers and you’re like, Oh my gosh. This is what I was writing in my journal there? And here’s all my socks from this time?

She says of her time as a royal: “I​​ was an actress. My entire job was ‘Tell me where to stand. Tell me what to say. Tell me how to say it. Tell me what to wear, and I’ll do it.’ And I’ll show up early, and I’ll probably bake something for the crew.”

The interviewer writes: “By her own analysis, her problems stemmed from her being an American, not necessarily a Black American, she explains. Her desire to ask lots of questions and to never be involved with something she couldn’t totally have her hands on seemed to violate an unspoken social norm.”

In one section of the interview, Davis goes on the school run with Meghan.

She writes: “At a stoplight, she reaches into the trunk and produces a brand-new black backpack and hands it to her security detail to give to an unhoused man on the corner. They are teaching Archie that some people live in big houses, some in small, and that some are in between homes. They made kits to pass out with water and peanut-butter crackers and granola bars. “I ate one!” Archie contributes.”

Asked if “there is room for forgiveness between her and her royal in-laws and her own family,” Meghan replies: “I think forgiveness is really important. It takes a lot more energy to not forgive. But it takes a lot of effort to forgive. I’ve really made an active effort, especially knowing that I can say anything… I have a lot to say until I don’t. Do you like that? Sometimes, as they say, the silent part is still part of the song.”

Read original article here

Meghan Markle Bullying Report Buried by Palace Which Is ‘Terrified of Upsetting or Provoking Harry and Meghan’

Royalist is The Daily Beast’s newsletter for all things royal and Royal Family. Subscribe here to get it in your inbox every Sunday.

The row over allegations that Meghan Markle bullied members of staff when she was a working member of the royal family—furiously denied by Meghan as a “smear campaign” at the time—descended into farce Thursday, after Buckingham Palace confirmed rumors that it would not publish a report it commissioned into the matter, not allow those who gave evidence to the report to see it, and not make public any changes to palace HR policy resulting from the report.

A source said the palace would not be commenting further but told The Daily Beast: “Recommendations will be taken forward,” adding, “Lessons have been learned.”

The palace told The Telegraph they were drawing the veil of secrecy to protect the “confidentiality” of, among others, those who gave evidence in the report, however there was widespread suspicion Thursday that the palace was actually acting to avoid antagonizing Harry and Meghan.

The couple still have the power to inflict tremendous reputational damage on the royals. Harry has a memoir scheduled to come out in the autumn and they have been seen with Oprah Winfrey in recent days, prompting fears the couple could be planning another sitdown.

The bullying allegations were made by Meghan and Harry’s communications director Jason Knauf in 2018, who wrote to their private secretary, alleging “totally unacceptable” behavior and claiming “that the Duchess was able to bully two PAs out of the household in the past year.”

However the claims only surfaced in The Times days before Harry and Meghan’s big interview with Oprah Winfrey, in which they accused a royal family member of racism. The move was widely seen as an “oppo dump” by the palace intended to blunt or distract from the impact of Harry and Meghan’s revelations.

The couple denied the allegations, saying Meghan was “saddened by this latest attack on her character, particularly as someone who has been the target of bullying herself.”

Buckingham Palace vowed to investigate the allegations but the Daily Mail reports that at a briefing Wednesday for the annual royal financial report it was revealed the findings would never be published, with the so-called Master of the Privy Purse, Sir Michael Stevens, saying of the investigation: “There is nothing on this in the report. As we said last year, this work was undertaken privately and had no Sovereign Grant money spent on it.”

The Mail said that staff who participated in the inquiry “only recently discovered it had been wound up” and “will not be told what its findings are.”

A source told the Mail: “Considering those who participated did so at great personal and reputational risk to themselves, the fact that they haven’t even been told what the findings are is unfathomable. I am sure they will be deeply distressed, but perhaps not entirely surprised given how things have been handled. The household seems to be terrified of upsetting or provoking Harry and Meghan.”

The revelation about the investigation being buried emerged as the annual report into the Sovereign Grant was published. It showed that the queen’s total annual expenditure increased by 17 per cent to £102.4 million ($122 million) during 2021/22, and that the property maintenance budget soared by £14.4 million ($17.26 million) to £63.9 million ($76.2 million), largely driven by extensive renovations at Buckingham Palace.

Read original article here

Prince Charles Accepted $3M in Cash Stuffed Into Bags and Suitcases from Sheik

Welcome to this week’s edition of Royalist, The Daily Beast’s newsletter for all things royal and Royal Family. Subscribe here to get it in your inbox every Sunday.

Charles’ judgement under fresh scrutiny over bags of cash

The cartoon image of Prince Charles rubbing his hands with glee while chucking shopping bags stuffed full of banknotes into the back of his wine-powered Aston Martin like something out of the irreverent British comedy The Windsors is on the Royalist’s mind today.

The image follows the astonishing revelation that the heir to the throne was personally handed a suitcase containing €1m (just over $1.05m) by a politician representing a rich oil-producing Arab statelet.

“It was one of three lots of cash, totaling €3 million ($3.2m), which Prince Charles personally received from Sheik Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani, the former prime minister of Qatar who is nicknamed ‘HBJ,’ between 2011 and 2015,” the London Sunday Times reports.

The story, described as “truly shocking” by a senior ethics official, will cement in many minds Charles’ reputation for financial indiscipline. While it may be a little too much to say it jeopardizes his succession, it certainly poses urgent and new questions about the judgement of the heir to the throne when it comes to money matters.

Late last year, Charles lost his key aide Michael Fawcett, who was forced to stand down from Charles’ foundation after it was revealed he arranged an honor for a billionaire Saudi donor, explicitly in return for donations. Charles denied any knowledge of the transactional arrangement but a reported police investigation into the matter has provided no answers, being discreet to the point of invisibility. Prince Harry pointedly accused his father of being involved in what he described as a “scandal” over the affair.

In the latest self-inflicted disaster to hit Charles, the Sunday Times has revealed that Sheik Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani, personally gave Charles bags of cash on three separate occasions between 2011 and 2015.

On each occasion, HBJ is said to have given the prince €1 million in €500 notes—sometimes dubbed ‘bin Ladens’ because of their use by terrorist-linked organized crime gangs. One time the money was stuffed into plastic shopping bags from the luxury Chelsea grocer and department store Fortnum & Mason, which holds a royal charter from the prince. Another time the money was in a suitcase, and the third time it was in a holdall.

Clarence House insisted to the Times that it makes no difference that the money, which was deposited into an account at exclusive bankers Coutts, just happened to arrive in cash and that “all the correct processes were followed.”

However a source described as “one of Charles’s former advisers who handled some of the cash,” told the Sunday Times that “everyone felt very uncomfortable about the situation,” adding that the, “only thing we could do was to count the money and make a mutual record of what we’d done. And then call the bank.”

HBJ, a member of Qatar’s ruling al-Thani family, is a hugely controversial figure, with an estimated personal wealth of $12 billion, having served as Qatar’s prime minister between 2007 and 2013, during which time he cultivated close links with the U.K., which saw the country’s vast sovereign wealth fund invest in Harrods and the iconic London skyscraper the Shard.

Charles was believed to have used his influence to get the Qataris to pull out of the redevelopment of a high profile site in Chelsea called Chelsea Barracks. The High Court said Charles’s involvement in the matter was “unexpected and unwelcome.”

Sir Alistair Graham, former chairman of the committee on standards in public life, told the Sunday Times the revelations were “truly shocking,” saying: “I wouldn’t make a distinction between a politician and a member of the royal family. If the Qatari government wants to make a gift to his foundation, then there are proper ways to do these things rather than handling large sums of cash.”

Beatrice’s card reportedly declined at Glasto

At the other end of the financial scale, Princess Beatrice’s bank card was apparently declined three times at a bar at British music festival Glastonbury. A spy told the Daily Star: “She tried to pay by card but it got declined three times.”

Good news for her dad, Prince Andrew, on the money front, however. The Mirror reports that Author Ingrid Seward told True Royalty TV’s The Royal Beat, “They’re not going to cast him out because he will be more trouble and start talking and giving TV interviews and writing books. They don’t want that again. He will be financially secure, but I would be very surprised if he kept the Royal Lodge.”

Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty Images

Andrew smiles away

If Prince Andrew is worried about losing his Duke of York title—after 80% of that town said they wanted to cut their link with him—he wasn’t showing it Saturday. The Daily Mail showed him riding a horse cheerily around the Windsor Castle estate.

As The Daily Beast reported, York Central MP Rachael Maskell, has brought forward the “Removal of Titles Bill,” after polls showed that 80 percent of its citizens want to be freed of their link with the shamed royal, who has refused to stop using the title, which was given to him as a wedding present in 1986.

Maskell told the Daily Mail: “Back in February, when we had the focus on the court case, which was being brought against Andrew, my constituents responded that 80% of people wanted the association with the current Duke of York to be broken. And therefore, I met with the clerks here in the Commons to see how it can be achieved.”

She discovered there were “no mechanisms in place, even for the monarch, to remove the title. The only real way it could be done is for Andrew to no longer call himself, by choice, the Duke of York.”

She added: “Using a title like the Duke of York is an ambassadorial role, it carries the name of our city across the world.

“And it’s a city, which is a Human Rights City, the only Human Rights City in England. We are already in a culture clash when we are talking about violence against women and girls and the issues that we are really working hard on in the city, about making York a very safe place.”

Subscribe here to get all the latest royal news and gossip with Tom Sykes and Tim Teeman.

Epstein victim: Andrew photo made me “shake” in terror

Annie Farmer, a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, tells the Sun that the picture of Andrew with Maxwell, his arm around Virginia Roberts Giuffre, makes her shake. Farmer, speaking in advance of Maxwell’s sentencing on Tuesday, said in an impact statement: “I remember sitting at my desk in a Houston hospital physically shaking after seeing the photo of Maxwell with Virginia Giuffre and Prince Andrew because it became clear to me how their scheme had continued.”

“I never would have met Epstein if not for you,” Farmer, who claims the abuse at Epstein and Maxwell’s hands occurred when she was 16, writes. “You opened the door to hell. And then, Ghislaine, like a wolf in sheep’s clothing, you used your femininity to betray us, and you led us all through it.” The pair did “unthinkable things” to her, Farmer says.

Royals rethink colonial legacy

A sign that the royals are at least trying to address the many horrors of Britain’s colonial past comes with the news that Prince Charles wants slavery to be accorded public recognition, in a similar vein to the annual remembrance of the Holocaust.

Charles expressed “personal sorrow” at the U.K. links to the slave trade during a visit to Rwanda last week, no doubt encouraged to speak on the issue by protests about the legacy of slavery on William and Kate’s recent tour of the Caribbean, which was criticized in some quarters as “tone-deaf.”

A senior royal source told the Sunday Times: “He is patron of the Holocaust Memorial Day Trust and he notes that in the U.K., we now know and learn at school all about the Holocaust, so it is something that is acknowledged and learnt at a national level. That is not true of the transatlantic slave trade, and maybe that is something that should be.

“So, just like the Holocaust Memorial Day, is there some way of doing that? Having a moment, having a way of remembering that?”

Queen Elizabeth II crowns her son Charles, Prince of Wales, during his investiture ceremony at Caernarvon Castle.

Hulton Archive/Getty Images

This week in royal history

July 1 is one of the strangest dates in the royal calendar, marking the birth of Princess Diana on that day in 1961, while on the same day eight years later in 1969, Prince Charles became the Prince of Wales at an investiture ceremony at Caernarvon Castle in north Wales.

Unanswered questions

If someone turned up at your house with a million dollars in cash on three separate occasions, might you not think you ought to call the authorities? This provokes the question: will the latest mystery-cash scandal prove merely embarrassing for Prince Charles, or could it get worse and wind up threatening his actual legitimacy as monarch?

Love The Daily Beast’s royal coverage? Sign up here to get Royalist newsletters sent straight to your inbox.

Read original article here

Harry and Meghan Told ‘No Chance’ of Queen and Lilibet Photo

Royalist is The Daily Beast’s newsletter for all things royal and Royal Family. Subscribe here to get it in your inbox every Sunday.

The queen’s enforcers reportedly told Harry and Meghan “no chance” when the couple asked for a photograph of the Monarch meeting their child Lilibet for the first time.

The revelation of the denied photograph emerged as Harry and Meghan issued their own picture of their daughter to celebrate her first birthday.

The Sussexes issued the picture Monday night, the day after the official end of the Jubilee celebrations. It showed that Lilibet has inherited her father’s red hair.

The picture was taken at their Windsor home, Frogmore Cottage, by Misan Harriman, a photographer who has taken previous personal photographs of the couple and their family.

They were told no chance. It was a private family meeting

Palace Source

The Sun reported that while the queen met Harry and Meghan’s daughter on Thursday, when they were briefly in the U.K. for the Jubilee, no photos of the meeting were taken.

The Daily Beast previously reported that sources had said it was highly unlikely that any such image would be issued.

The Sun quoted a source as saying the royals were nervous about a photograph of the encounter being snapped in case it ended up on U.S. TV networks.

An insider told the newspaper: “Harry and Meghan wanted their photographer to capture the moment Lilibet met the queen.

“But they were told no chance. It was a private family meeting.”

The Sussexes’ relationship with the queen is thought to have been damaged when the couple named their daughter Lilibet, the queen’s nickname as a child, without seeking her permission first.

The denial of an official photograph with the queen was just one of many sleights dished out to Harry and Meghan over the course of the Jubilee.

The couple left the U.K. on a private jet before the main event of the final day—a pageant in honor of the queen through the streets of London—had started, and were in the air when Her Majesty appeared on the Buckingham Palace balcony.

A friend of the royals characterised their hasty departure as attention seeking and peevish, telling The Daily Beast: “Would it have killed them to wait a few hours?”

They were seen in public only once in an official capacity in the course of the Jubilee celebrations, attending a Thanksgiving service for the reign of the queen. Audible boos were heard among the more usual cheers as they climbed the steps of St Paul’s Cathedral, and they were seated far away from important working royals such as Charles and William. Video of the event appears to show Meghan turning away when Kate walks past her.

Read original article here

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Hold First Birthday Party for Lilibet. No Senior Royals Went.

Welcome to this week’s edition of Royalist, The Daily Beast’s newsletter for all things royal and Royal Family. Subscribe here to get it in your inbox every Sunday.

Lilibet’s birthday party is the royal proxy war

The Daily Beast reported yesterday that it was “highly unlikely” that Queen Elizabeth was planning to “attend a rumored first birthday party for her great-grand-daughter Lilibet at Frogmore Cottage on Saturday,” and so it turned out.

The Sun reports that the “relaxed” birthday party for Lilibet, held by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, was absent real royals, with only the Tindall and Phillips kids—the grandchildren of Princess Anne—expected to show up.

Their parents—Zara and Mike Tindall, and Peter and Autumn Philips—are not HRHs, which makes their attendance entirely uncontroversial.

The queen, who was not well enough to make most of her own Jubilee celebrations, did not attend. Laid up at Windsor with mobility problems, she was in her “comfy clothes” watching the racing on TV, as Zara later told reporters at the Derby horse race. HM is believed to be gathering her strength in the hope she can make a balcony appearance Sunday to wrap up the four-day weekend.

William and Kate, meanwhile, made it amply clear they were not attending Lilibet’s first birthday party, and nor were their children, by the simple expedient of making a high profile public appearance hundreds of miles away in Cardiff with George and Charlotte Saturday.

Online joy was visible however, with birthday wishes for Lilibet issuing forth from the social media accounts of the Royal Family, Charles and Camilla, and Will and Kate. In private, it is known that the queen met her namesake for the first time at a private meeting with Harry and his family.

The Sun says Harry and Meghan “held an informal garden party at Frogmore Cottage, on the royal estate, with a birthday cake, balloons, party games and picnic snacks.”

It was a nice opportunity for the other royal children to meet Lilibet for the first time.

Royal source

Whoever has spoken to the paper is well-briefed on the event; and whatever else, it serves to show that the Sussexes have enjoyed at least one occasion over these last few days of Platinum Jubilee events—a period of time which, at least visually, has seemed to have underscored their isolation from the rest of the royals. Has Harry even spoken to William? No one knows. Not a smile has been exchanged the pair in public at least.

Sources told the Sun: “It was a lovely do and had everything you’d expect from a child’s birthday party. But there was no formal entertainment. The idea was for it to be very relaxed and casual, with people free to pop in and out as they wished. It was a nice opportunity for the other royal children to meet Lilibet for the first time. And as her first birthday is such a milestone, there was lots of discussion ahead of time about the presents that she would be given on the day. One idea that proved very popular was a £75 pink Volkswagen Beetle ride-on toy, which had been spotted in Selfridges.”

Lovely. And excellent product placement too!

Kate’s kids get cooking for Sunday’s pageantry

Sunday will see the finale event of the Jubilee take place, the Jubilee Pageant. This is a procession of floats, musicians, corgi puppets (we are not joking) and circus acts through central London’s ceremonial streets.

6,000 performers will line the two-mile route which follows that of the the 1953 coronation procession. Despite dire warnings of inclement weather, the rain has held off in London so far, and it looks like the organizers might get luckier than they did in 2012 when a three hour procession down the Thames in chilly and soaking wet conditions resulted in Prince Philip being hospitalized.

Sunday is also community party day in the U.K., and Charles and Camilla arrived shortly before noon local time at one such event at a London cricket ground, taking their places at a 20ft tea table, while Edward and Sophie were due to sit down at a table at The Long Walk in Windsor Great Park, where royal stans are attempting “to break the world record for the longest dinner table by assembling 488 tables,” the Daily Mail reports.

However, stealing the show are new images posted by Kate showing her three children baking in Cardiff yesterday.

Question: Why did the palace bother inviting Harry and Meghan at all?

Amidst all the glitz, glamor and Paddington Bear-based jubilation of yesterday’s pop concert at the palace, it was hard not to notice the absence of Harry and Meghan. The Daily Beast does not know whether they were “NFI” as the old British saying goes (Not F*****g Invited) or made a decision not to attend themselves. Lending credence to the second version of events is a rumor circulating that they were invited to the Guildhall reception after the St Paul’s Cathedral service Friday, but chose not to go of their own volition.

Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, Princess Charlotte of Cambridge, Prince George of Cambridge, Prince William, Duke of Cambridge watch Paddington Bear and HM The Queen on screen during the Platinum Party at the Palace in front of Buckingham Palace.

Chris Jackson/Getty Images

Are they are being invited to these occasions, and choosing not to go. Maybe. If you are being made to feel as unwelcome as the royals seem to be making them, why would you play nice for the cameras?

Instead, Harry and Meghan maybe watched the event on TV at their Frogmore Cottage home (or maybe not). Let’s hope they got pizza and beer, and resisted the temptation of throwing the crusts at William and Charles when they made their speeches on screen.

Subscribe here to get all the latest royal news and gossip with Tom Sykes and Tim Teeman.

The “Platty Jub” so far, in case you missed it

The Platinum Jubilee weekend draws to a close Sunday afternoon, and as royal planners review events so far, they are likely reasonably satisfied how things have gone after all the years of planning.

Day 1, Thursday was an out and out hit. Sunshine, blue skies and a miraculously healthy monarch appearing not once, not twice but three times to receive the gratitude of her people. The first two appearances were on the balcony at Buckingham Palace during and after the Trooping the Color ceremony which celebrates the queen’s official birthday and went like clockwork.

Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Louis of Cambridge look out on the balcony of Buckingham Palace during the Trooping the Colour parade on June 02, 2022 in London, England.

Chris Jackson/Getty Images

The third, which was allegedly to trigger the Beacon Lighting ceremonies around the U.K., was perhaps a slight dud; the queen emerged from the Sovereign’s Entrance at Windsor Castle, leaning heavily on a stick, and pressed a button presented as an orb, which lit a row of Christmas lights arranged, we think, like a scepter. These somehow were then supposed to link up with Prince William doing the same thing at Buckingham Palace. A certain amount of magical thinking was required.

The effect wasn’t helped by the fact that many communities in the U.K. lit their beacons long before the queen hit the button.

Thursday also saw day one of Operation Hide Meghan and Harry swing into effect. After making a big deal of the fact they had been invited to the celebrations, and would be watching ‘Trooping’ with other members of the royal family in a ceremonial room overlooking the parade ground, Harry and Meghan were very much not invited to wave to photographers from the windows. A few grainy shots ultimately did emerge of them jocularly shushing the Tindall kids.

Thursday ended with a bit of a downer; the news that the queen had found the day rather uncomfortable and would not be making appearance at a service of Thanksgiving for her reign at St Paul’s Cathedral the next day. That service was a fascinating pictorial representation of royal dysfunction as Harry and Meghan were brutally booted out of the inner circle of the royal family, seated miles away from William, Kate and Charles in the cathedral. Amazingly, the brothers did not even acknowledge each others’ existence.

Prince William, Duke of Cambridge and Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall during the Platinum Party at the Palace in front of Buckingham Palace on June 04, 2022 in London, England.

Chris Jackson – WPA Pool/Getty Images

After the service, Harry and Meghan did not attend a reception, although a rumor is circulating that they were invited—instead hightailing it back to Frogmore Cottage. Saturday’s daytime event—the Derby horse race—was dominated by the ongoing absence of the queen; however, she made a pre-recorded appearance at the evening Party at the Palace thanks to her Paddington Bear skit, which was charming and funny.

Britain’s Sophie, Countess of Wessex (L), James, Viscount Severn (C) and Britain’s Lady Louise Windsor (R) take their seats for the Platinum Party at Buckingham Palace on June 4, 2022 as part of Queen Elizabeth II’s platinum jubilee celebrations.

CHRIS JACKSON/POOL/AFP via Getty Images

Again, there was no sign of Harry and Meghan. Perhaps the last chance to rectify the omission will come Sunday evening when, according to the worst-kept secret in Britain, there will be another balcony appearance at the end of the Jubilee pageant. If the queen makes it, and Harry and Meghan are not included, it’s hard to see when the family will ever take the opportunity to publicly reconcile.

This week in royal history

The first weekend in June is always when Elizabeth celebrates her “official birthday,” the real one being 21 April. It is Edward VII who is to blame for all this two-birthdays business. His birthday was on 9 November, but in 1908 he moved the ceremony to summer in the hope of less inclement weather.

Were he alive Prince Philip would have turned 101 on June 10. He was born on that day, 1921, at Villa Mon Repos, in Corfu, Greece.

Unanswered questions

CHEEZ, SO MANY. Who is responsible for the low, low, low profile of Harry and Meghan over this weekend, and are the palace aware it looks like the Californians are being snubbed all over again? Why did Harry and Meghan bother coming to the U.K., knowing they would be so universally blanked by the fam? Was it for that one audience with the queen, knowing it might be the only time she meets the great grand-daughter who bears her pet name, Lilibet? Whatever, one supposes it’s been a rough and strange few days for them.

And have the celebrations served a necessary double purpose: a loud hosannah for the queen’s 70 years on the throne, while also being an optimistic effort by the palace to sell the new players in the royal soap opera, major and bit parts, to the public? If so, has it worked, or merely shown the royal family to be an anachronistic bunch of mega-toffs into pageantry and dress-up, which the public will ultimately tire of paying for?

Has the Platinum Jubilee been a four-day party of praise and joy for royal fans, and an excuse to drink, take time off work, let your hair down, or hide in a dark corner wishing it would all be over, for everyone else?

Love The Daily Beast’s royal coverage? Sign up here to get Royalist newsletters sent straight to your inbox.

Read original article here

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Are So Far Enduring an Ice-Cold Platinum Jubilee

Royalist is The Daily Beast’s newsletter for all things royal and Royal Family. Subscribe here to get it in your inbox every Sunday.

Buckingham Palace’s favorite method of communication sometimes seems to be semaphore. Over the course of the Jubilee celebrations so far, the palace couldn’t have made it clearer via several mime shows that it has little interest in trying to flatter the egos of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle—nor any inclination to use the political capital of the queen’s last hurrah to sell a narrative of reconciliation between Harry and his brother Prince William, or their wives.

Instead, Harry and Meghan have been firmly treated as rather unimportant, second-class guests. Having apparently been strongly urged to do nothing to steal Her Majesty’s limelight they have had little choice other than to like it or lump it, as the old British saying goes.

The fact that they are so desperately unpopular in Britain that their ratings are in the toilet and on Friday they were subjected to audible boos amongst the more usual cheers when they arrived at St Paul’s Cathedral is likely to have made this ruthless strategic decision by the palace somewhat easier.

At the church service, the couple were seated across the aisle from Charles (representing the queen, who was too unwell to attend) and William, a long, long way, physically and spiritually, from the new nexus of royal power. Their seat mates were not future kings and queens of the United Kingdom but a collection of second division players; Beatrice, Eugenie, Prince Edward et al.

As Tina Brown, founding editor of The Daily Beast and author of the new book The Palace Papers, told The Daily Beast: “The seating definitely declared they have slipped to supporting players, buried in the royal B-list.”

After Friday’s service, and some careful choreography that avoided even the merest possibility of Sussex and Cambridge entering each other’s personal space or even making eye contact, the great and the good were whisked off to London’s Guildhall to hobnob and backslap, with the notable exception of Harry and Meghan, who, were back at their house in Windsor, Frogmore Cottage, before the last stragglers had left the shindig.

It was the latest in a series of meaningful unspoken slights. On Thursday they were excluded from any visual presentations around the Trooping the Color celebration (although a few grainy long-lens photos trickled out eventually), explicitly not invited to the Buckingham Palace balcony appearance with the queen and were not present at any of the beacon lighting ceremonies around the country.

The messaging clearly suggested that while it was jolly nice to have them there, these Californians were highly expendable in terms of the royal master plan—and certainly wouldn’t be getting any special treatment.

Nothing happens by accident in the world of royal choreography. Courtiers were well aware that the billions of eyes on social media were very much hoping for a re-run of the 2020 Commonwealth Service when Kate blanked Meghan.

The palace was understandably not interested in facilitating a game of spot the difference. And they know that if Harry or Meghan had been photographed with William or Kate, the giant exercise of compare and contrast is all anyone would have been talking about this weekend.

As far as the palace is concerned, that’s not what the millions of hours of planning that have gone into the Platinum Jubilee were intended to achieve.

The low-profiling of Harry and Meghan is likely to continue for the remainder of the weekend. For example, although sources say that William and Kate will each give speeches at Saturday night’s Platinum Party at the Palace, there is no indication that Harry and Meghan will even be in attendance.

A forecast of torrential downpours on Sunday is adding to fears the great national celebration could have a rather soggy, underwhelming end.

For similar reasons, The Daily Beast understands that it is also considered highly unlikely that the queen will attend a rumored first birthday party for her great-grand-daughter Lilibet at Frogmore Cottage on Saturday, and even more unlikely that a photograph of the queen with Lilibet will be released, as some have suggested, again at least partially out of concern that to do so would provide a major distraction from the core message of the Jubilee, which is, of course: “God save the queen,” and the achievements of Queen Elizabeth.

Will the queen be seen in public again? Not on Saturday during the day at least—Buckingham Palace said she would not attend the Derby horse race; Princess Anne will most likely stand in for her. It is a wait-and-see for the concert at the palace on Saturday night. A forecast of torrential downpours on Sunday is adding to fears the great national celebration could have a rather soggy, underwhelming end.

It was interesting to note that a story saying that the queen had met Lilibet at a lunch party on Thursday had its genesis in a claim by by Omid Scobie, the reporter who wrote the sympathetic Sussex biography Finding Freedom. Scobie, who is thought to be close to the Sussexes and their team, and was briefed by Meghan’s representatives when writing the book, said on a BBC breakfast show that the queen had finally met her namesake on Thursday.

The palace, for their part, flatly refused to comment on the veracity of Scobie’s claims, even off the record.

The reality is that despite several opportunities to position Harry and Meghan in any of many permutations with William Kate Charles and Camilla, the inherently risk-averse powers at the palace have definitively chosen not to do so.

The focus of a Jubilee is apparently the individual whose reign is being marked, but really this human is a Trojan horse for the wider institution of monarchy. In this sense, the Jubilee has given us a glimpse of the rapidly oncoming world of King Charles III, who was undoubtedly handed a gift from the heavens when his troublesome brother Andrew went down with Covid, meaning he could not attend the one event to which he had been invited, Friday’s church service, which Charles ended up presiding over in place of his ailing mother.

The glitz of its ceremony-making runs in tandem with the ruthlessness of the palace. Harry and Meghan have spent the last two years attacking the royal family, so it should hardly be a surprise that the institution has retaliated by treating them with ill-disguised disdain.

Read original article here

Prince Andrew’s Bizarre Teddy Collection Had to Be Perfectly Positioned on Bed or He Would ‘Scream and Shout’

Prince Andrew, as an adult, had a collection of dozens of fluffy toys which had to be precisely positioned on his bed or he would scream abuse at his household staff, a former royal employee has claimed in a TV documentary due to be screened Tuesday evening in the U.K.

The aide, Paul Page, said in an interview for the documentary, ITV’s Ghislaine, Prince Andrew and the Paedophile, which tracks his relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell and postulates they may have been lovers, that a laminated diagram was kept in a drawer in Andrew’s bedroom at Buckingham Palace showing exactly how his beloved soft toy collection should be arranged, along with cushions emblazoned with words such as “Daddy, “Ducks” and “Prince.”

The laminated instructions said: “When the DOY is staying overnight, place one small teddy & cushion in the turn down.

“When making the bed, place the teddy & cushion next to the teddy on the left-hand side with the necklaces on.”

Page, who worked as a protection officer from 1998 to 2004, told the TV show: “It had about 50 or 60 stuffed toys positioned on the bed and basically there was a card the inspector showed us in a drawer and it was a picture of these bears all in situ.

“The reason for the laminated picture was if those bears weren’t put back in the right order by the maids, he would shout and scream.”

Page was jailed for a £3million fraud scam in 2009, however he is far from the only witness to the duke’s bizarre love of teddies.

According to the Mirror, writer Elizabeth Day also saw the teddies, and said, “It seemed rather strange that a grown man should be so amused by a stuffed toy.”

After his wedding to Sarah Ferguson, his brother Prince Edward strapped a huge brown teddy bear into their going away carriage.

And in 2010, Andrew himself revealed: “I’ve always collected teddy bears. Everywhere I went in the Navy I used to buy a little teddy bear, so I’ve got a collection from all over the world of one sort or another.”

Away from the delights of soft toys, it was reported today that the queen is considering ways to strip Andrew and Prince Harry of their last remaining constitutional roles as Counselors of State. There are four Counselors of State—the others being William and Charles— and the position means that they theoretically take on the queen’s formal duties if she were incapacitated.

A royal source told the Daily Mail: “It is a genuine problem that the palace is looking to address. Can you imagine the Duke of York having to sign official documents, for example, because the Prince of Wales and the Duke of Cambridge were both abroad, and the Queen became ill? It’s not an exaggeration to say it could put the monarchy in jeopardy.”

Read original article here