Tag Archives: royal family

Owning a Rolls-Royce is not as luxurious as it seems

A luxury roll through time

I am now reading repetitive stories about Rolls-Royce being “on a roll.”

OK, but back when family silverware came largely from the Automat, I actually reported my Day One excitement of owning a Rolls-Royce. By Day 10 — in the Coney Island Times, which was all I could scratch up to write in back then — I reported the total experience.

The car my husband bought? It quick laid down dead. A wheeze, a cough — and straight to Rolls-Royce heaven. Second greatest day? It stopped on a six-lane highway and Fords, Chevrolets, Volkswagens zoomed by yelling “Get a horse.”

Our salesman, so British that next to him King Charles sounds southern, said: “Merely a minor adjustment, Moddom.” One month’s minor adjustment later my husband clambered back in. Ignition off, nobody around and the rear windows moved by themselves. Both directional signals worked simultaneously. And the rear’s right-side makeup mirror light lit up the mahogany desk on the left side.

Also, air conditioning in January blasted from the heating unit. “Minor adjustment, Moddom,” oozed its salesman, whose headquarters probably still has my Coney Island Times review somewhere hidden in their vault.


Car had 99 probs, I wasn’t one

On a country road straightaway, late at night, no other car around, this Silver Shadow triumph got up to 5 miles to the gallon. In city traffic that fell off a little. “One does not purchase a Rolls for economy,” hummed the salesman peering at us as if to say, “If the pound hadn’t devalued, we wouldn’t even be doing business with the likes of you.”

High noon, on 57th and Madison, this white dream car — JA4 license plate — had a crowd around. Photos were taken of it. The hood was up. Smoke billowed from the engine. I got onto the first thing moving — a bus going uptown — and where I was headed was downtown.

The Rolls Royce Silver Shadow triumph got up to 5 miles to the gallon.
Getty Images/ Corbis

Next a brake lining problem and reheating situation. Also the radio stopped, rear license plate holder fell off, the trunk locked — and the car stopped dead. IN TRAFFIC. But so chic that even when it couldn’t move we, the owners, surged with pride leaning against it to summon a cab.

They say the only thing that makes noise in a Rolls is the clock. Yeah. Unless you count the owner crying.

We hadn’t realized ours had possibly been one of the earliest Silver Shadow designs and was maybe even a used store model. Whatever. To tell you the truth, the thrill of owning even an asthmatic Rolls dies hard.


Judy’s jibes

A HIGHLIGHT from Judge Judy’s scathing British press blast in case you missed it:

“Prince Harry writes William ‘recoiled’ from Meghan’s first hug. Biting the hand that fed him, he’s a selfish, spoiled, ungrateful disingenuous grandchild. I’d be furious and hurt if my child or grandchild did the same to me.”

Prince Harry’s latest book is causing more drama for the royal family.
Getty Images/Kirsty O’Connor

Divorced Me-Me-Meghan dumped her father, castigated her former best friend, fought with everyone else, looked only to make money and get famous, and will eventually expend bodily fluid on Prince Empty as has his entire birthplace.

His name’s everywhere but on toilet paper. So . . . let’s . . . just . . . wait.


Meghan’s piggy bank will soon learn money can’t buy happiness. What it gets you is a richer class of estranged relatives.

Only in the UK, kids, only in the UK.

Read original article here

Prince Harry’s ghostwriter defends memoir’s ‘inadvertent mistakes’

Prince Harry’s ghostwriter is addressing the differences between “memory and fact” as the “Spare” memoir’s errors make headlines.

J.R. Moehringer took to Twitter on Wednesday to brush off “inadvertent mistakes” with a quote from “The Art of Memoir” by Mary Karr.

“The line between memory and fact is blurry, interpretation and fact,” the excerpt reads.

“There are inadvertent mistakes of those kinds out of the wazoo.”

The tweet came one day after the 38-year-old Duke of Sussex’s memoir hit US bookshelves.

Harry didn’t hold back in his bombshell tell-all, even accusing Prince William of physically assaulting him in 2019.

Prince Harry’s ghostwriter defended “inadvertent mistakes” in “Spare.”
Getty Images
The author noted the “blurry” line between facts and memories.
Pacific Press/LightRocket via Ge

Eagle-eyed readers have accused the former military pilot of making “factual errors” in the memoir.

The duke, for example asserted that he was at boarding school when he found out about the Queen Mother’s death in March 2002, with multiple reports setting the record straight.

Harry’s memoir hit bookshelves Tuesday.
Getty Images

The then-teenager was reportedly on a Switzerland ski trip at the time with William and King Charles III.

Harry also wrote that he is King Henry VI’s “great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandfather,” but many social media users have pointed out that the sovereign only had one son, who died in battle before having children of his own.

The Duke of Sussex has called the book the correct “history.”
CBS via Getty Images

“Prince Harry cannot even fact-check his own family tree given that he remains under the impression he is descendent from King Henry VI, whose son died childless at 17,” one person wrote. “But sure, let’s all believe.”

In addition, Air New Zealand clarified to the New Zealand Herald that they “never operated flights” between Mexico and Great Britain after Harry recalled buying a “first-class ticket” of the like for Meghan Markle’s dad, Thomas Markle.

The prince has yet to address the inaccuracies, telling Stephen Colbert on Tuesday that his book is “history [getting] it right.”

Harry has been accused of “factual errors.”
Getty Images

Twitter users poked fun at this statement in their replies to Moehringer’s tweet.

“The problem with his facts being off is that he is writing this for ‘history’,” one wrote, while another called the excuse “gashlighting.”

Others, however, praised the “Tender Bar” author for helping Harry “speak his truth so clearly.”

Buckingham Palace told Page Six last week it would not be commenting on any allegations in “Spare.”



Read original article here

Prince Harry defends William baldness comments in new interview

Bye to brotherly love.

Prince Harry is defending the comments he made calling attention to his brother Prince William’s “alarming” baldness in his forthcoming memoir, “Spare.”

The Duke of Sussex, 38, appeared on “60 Minutes” Sunday night and spoke to Anderson Cooper about his contentious relationship with his older brother, 40.

Cooper read the beginning of “Spare,” in which Prince Harry makes a dig at Prince William’s hair loss, and called it “cutting.”

“I don’t see it as cutting at all,” the Invictus Games founder replied.

“My brother and I love each other. I love him deeply.”

The royal also told Cooper that there’s been “a lot of pain” between the brothers — “especially the last six years” — and that they no longer speak regularly.

Prince Harry has defended what he wrote about Prince William going bald.
Getty Images

In “Spare,” Prince Harry describes the moment following the funeral of their grandfather, Prince Philip, when he noticed how his sibling’s physical appearance had changed in recent years.

Prince Harry spoke to Anderson Cooper about his forthcoming memoir.
CBS

“I looked at Willy, really looked at him, maybe for the first time since we were boys. I took it all in: his familiar scowl, which had always been his default in dealings with me, his alarming baldness, more advanced than my own; his famous resemblance to Mummy, which was fading with time,” Harry writes.

Prince Harry also revealed the brothers are no longer in touch.
Getty Images

The palace told Page Six it would not be commenting on any allegations made in the bombshell book, which is officially out on Tuesday.

Harry starts “Spare” with a dig at his brother’s fading looks.
POOL/AFP via Getty Images

Read original article here

Prince Harry on “60 Minutes:” ‘I was a ‘body’ Camilla left in the road

It looks like there’s no love lost between this stepson and his allegedly wicked stepmother. Prince Harry is holding nothing back blasting Camilla, the Queen Consort. 

During an interview with Anderson Cooper on Sunday night on “60 Minutes,” while promoting his much-hyped memoir “Spare,” Harry, 38, said that Camilla’s need to rehabilitate her image from being a “villain” in the British press made her “dangerous” to him, “Because of the connections that she was forging within the British press,” he said. 

“And there was open willingness on both sides to trade of information. And with a family built on hierarchy, and with her, on the way to being Queen consort, there was gonna be people or bodies left in the street because of that.”

Harry felt that he was one of these “bodies,” he told Cooper, 55, on “60 Minutes.” He further wrote in his book, “Camilla sacrificed me on her personal P.R. altar.”

Prince Harry opens up about Camilla on “60 Minutes.”
60 Minutes / CBS
Prince Harry gets candid on “60 Minutes.”
Camilla, Queen Consort, and Prince Harry in 2012.
Getty Images
Prince Harry and Camilla, Queen Consort, in 2015.
Getty Images

Harry has previously spoken out about his family throwing him and Meghan Markle under the bus, in order to make themselves look better in the public eye.

In their Netflix docuseries “Harry & Meghan,” Harry alleged that both his father Charles and his brother William leaked stories about the couple to the media, and also engaged in “trading” stories. (As he explained, that’s when a member of the royal family offers the press a scoop on a different member, in order to try to extinguish negative stories about themselves).

Harry said that he and William swore to never do this practice of “trading,” but William broke that promise.“To see my brother’s office copy the very same thing we promised the two of us would never ever do, that was heartbreaking,” Harry said in the documentary. 

Prince Harry, Camilla, and Kate Middleton in 2014.
UK Press via Getty Images
Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex gives a speech next to Prince Charles, Prince of Wales, Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex in 2014.
Chris Jackson/Getty Images
Prince Charles, Prince of Wales, Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, Queen Elizabeth II, Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex, Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, Prince William, Duke of Cambridge and Kate Middleton, Duchess of Cambridge in 2018.
Getty Images

Now, he’s stating that Camilla left him as a “body in the street” because of her need to give herself a better image than being the “other woman” in King Charles’ and Princess Diana’s marriage. 

After Camilla and Charles had a widely publicized affair that led to Charles and Diana divorcing, Charles and Camilla finally married in 2005. Prince Harry wasn’t happy about that, either, he dishes in his book, and neither was Prince William.

Meanwhile, “60 Minutes” co-host Cooper pressed Harry about why both brothers told their father not to marry Camilla. “We didn’t think it was necessary,” he said. “We thought that it was gonna cause more harm than good. And that if he was now with his person — surely that’s enough. Why go that far when you don’t necessarily need to?”

“Spare” comes out Jan. 10. 

Read original article here

Prince Harry admits to ‘drinking heavy,’ using hard drugs

Prince Harry has revealed that in the decades-long wake of his mother Princess Diana’s death, he turned to “drinking heavy” and — and sampled a series of mind-altering hard drugs. 

During an interview with Anderson Cooper Sunday night on “60 Minutes,” Harry, 38, answered questions about his tell-all book, “Spare,” which comes out Tuesday. 

All week, Harry has been on a promotional tour for the book, which is filled with details such as William allegedly getting into a physical altercation with Harry over Meghan Markle, and Harry having a frostbitten “todger” during William and Kate Middleton’s wedding. 

Cooper, 55, questioned Harry about his admitted substance abuse — including booze, cocaine, pot and more — in the past. Harry said he did it in response to his mother’s death.

60 Minutes CBS/ Inset AFP via Getty Images

“It was obvious to us as kids the British press’ part in our mother’s misery and I had a lot of anger inside of me that luckily, I never expressed to anybody,” he said. “But I resorted to drinking heavily.  Because I wanted to numb the feeling, or I wanted to distract myself from how … whatever I was thinking. And I would, you know, resort to drugs as well.” 

He also said that he felt that using psychedelics, Ayahuasca, psilocybin, mushrooms, helped him.

“I would never recommend people to do this recreationally — but doing it with the right people if you are suffering from a huge amount of loss, grief or trauma, then these things have a way of working as a medicine. For me, they cleared the windshield, the windshield of the misery of loss. They cleared away this idea that I had in my head that– that my mother, that I needed to cry to prove to my mother that I missed her. When in fact, all she wanted was for me to be happy.”

Part of the reason why he turned to drinking and drugs was that after Princess Diana’s tragic fatal car crash in 1997, Harry and William shared “similar thoughts” on the belief that she was really gone. 

“Maybe this is all part of a plan,” said Harry. “Then that she would call us and that we would go and join her, yeah.”

He said he held onto this belief for “years.” But when he was 20, he asked to see the police report about the crash that killed his mother, in order to have “proof.”  

“Proof that she was in the car. Proof that she was injured. And proof that the very paparazzi that chased her into the tunnel were the ones that were taking photographs– photographs of her lying half dead on the back seat of the car,” he said.

When Cooper asked Harry if he feels that he’s gotten all of the answers about what really happened when Princess Diana died in 1997, Harry said, “Truth be known, no. I don’t think I do. And I don’t think my brother does either. I don’t think the world does.”

Read original article here

Prince Harry to no longer have role in King Charles’ coronation: insiders

Unsurprisingly, Prince Harry’s incendiary memoir has only driven the wedge between him and his royal family deeper.

King Charles has decided his divergent son will play no part in his upcoming coronation after spilling countless family secrets, royal insiders claim.

“As things stand, there is no role for Harry in the service,” a source told The Sunday Times.

The King has completely written Prince Harry out of the coronation script, meaning he will be a mere audience member should he choose to attend the May 6 event.

In a major break from tradition, King Charles will not require the six royal dukes to kneel before him to “pay homage” before touching the crown and kissing the monarch’s right cheek, the outlet reported.

Instead, only Prince William — the son who hasn’t released multiple bombshell reports to the public — will perform the tradition.

Sources told The Sunday Times that both King Charles and Prince William are livid after Harry’s autobiography, “Spare,” was leaked this week.

Prince Harry mercilessly painted his brother as an abusive bully who tossed him to the ground in one of the palace cottages and even called him his “archnemesis.”

Though he mostly targeted his big brother, the ex-royal also threw shots at his father and hammered down on his previous claims that King Charles was an absentee father who abandoned him in the wake of his mother’s death.

King Charles is breaking with tradition and only have Prince William kneel before him, touch the crown and kiss his cheek.
TheImageDirect.com
Prince Harry accused his brother William of grabbing him and tossing him to the floor in his memoir.

The royal family is reportedly livid at Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, but have not made public comments on the memoir.


Advertisement

Prince Harry blames his family for not wanting to reconcile.


Advertisement

“The King is no less hurt because he personally hasn’t been the focus of the majority of the anger and frustration of the book. He feels it as keenly, it is no less painful for him because the focus is on his son rather than him. There is a lot family pain,” a friend of the monarchs told The Times.

It is not clear whether Prince Harry will attend his father’s monumental coronation.

Buckingham Palace insiders said King Charles was still planning on inviting Prince Harry and Meghan Markle in the days after the couple’s explosive Netflix documentary was released. Despite the feud, a “door will always be left ajar” for the duo, the sources said last month.

But Prince Harry refused to commit to attending the event, according to the second trailer of his upcoming bombshell interview with ITV’s Tom Bradby.

The former royal said his attendance would be up to his family.

“There’s a lot to be discussed and I really hope that they’re willing to sit down and talk about it,” Harry said.

The Duke of Sussex has repeatedly claimed he wants the bad blood between him and his family to end but blames them for prolonging the feud — “They’ve shown absolutely no willingness to reconcile,” he said.

In spite of his whining, Prince Harry has continued to expose family fights and secrets across multiple forums over the last several years.

Read original article here

Royals set up ‘war room’ over Prince Harry’s ‘Spare’ memoir

The royal family’s senior advisers set up a de-facto “war room” to deal with any potential fallout from Prince Harry’s bombshell memoir, Page Six can reveal.

Top staff even discussed the situation at Sandringham Estate, where the royal family gathered to celebrate their first Christmas without Queen Elizabeth, we’re told.

Insiders say a plan was drawn up to deal with the explosive revelations expected not just from Harry’s book, but also in his sit down with Anderson Cooper on CBS “60 Minutes” Sunday, which will be swiftly followed by an interview on ITV, “Good Morning America” and “The Late Show” with Stephen Colbert.

The royals and their staff racked their brains to come up with every possible story that Harry would include in his tome — and were said to be well aware he would recount his fight with William, where he claims that his brother knocked him into a dog bowl during a fight over Meghan Markle.

The Royal Family’s senior advisers set up a defacto “war room” ahead of the release of Prince Harry’s book, “Spare.”
Samir Hussein/WireImage
Prince Harry — seen with wife Meghan Markle in a still from their Netflix show — made a series of bombshell claims in his new book
Netflix

“He broke my necklace by grabbing me by the collar of my shirt … I fell on the dog bowl, it broke under my back and the pieces scratched me,” Harry wrote.

One highly placed insider told us: “There were undoubtedly fears about what Harry was going to write, and in particular they were worried about the highly personal moments of their lives being retold.

“The King wanted to move ahead with the traditional ‘stiff upper lip’ attitude and follow in the Queen’s famous footsteps of ‘never complain, never explain’, but the Prince of Wales argued that perhaps the family should, in fact, go on the offensive and release a statement, much in the same way he said ‘We are very much not a racist family’, but he was overruled by his father.”


Inside Harry’s new memoir


The UK Daily Telegraph also confirmed the palace was on a “war footing” ahead of the book’s release, adding that after reading excerpts of the book, their worst fears were not realized.

Despite everything, The Sunday Times of London reported that William is acutely aware the royal family has to stay quiet. As one close friend of both brothers told the outlet, “He (William) won’t retaliate, he never would, because he’s dignified and unbelievably loyal. William is a sitting duck because Harry knows he isn’t going to retaliate. How many shots can you take at a sitting duck?

“It’s cruel, cowardly and so sad for William to keep taking the punches. He’s keeping quiet for the good of his family and the country.”

Harry’s book “Spare,” will be published Tuesday around the world, but embarrassingly excerpts leaked to Page Six this week before it mistakenly went on sale early in Spain before being pulled off the bookshelves.

Prince Harry spills the beans on his childhood — and his feud with his brother Prince William in his new memoir, “Spare,” out Tuesday
King Charles and Prince William at Sandringham on Christmas Day, their first without Queen Elizabeth.
Samir Hussein/WireImage

Among his shock claims, the Duke of Sussex, 38, talks of his rift with William, 40, drags his sister-in-law Princess Kate and reveals the final words he said to his grandmother shortly after she died in September. He also tells how he and William urged their father not to marry Camilla Parker Bowles.

He also detailed the tense Sandringham summit in early 2020 where Harry tried to get his relatives to agree to a “half-in-half out” model, where he and Markle would be allowed to live out of the country and be part-time royals. Her Majesty disagreed, prompting them to quit their senior royal roles and move to California.

As Page Six revealed Saturday, William and Kate were left “reeling” by the book, but despite this, Buckingham Palace and Kensington Palace officials will not comment on the book, just like they refused to comment about the Sussexes’ Netflix show “Harry & Meghan.”

Prince Harry’s interview with Anderson Cooper for CBS “60 Minutes” will air Sunday night.
CBS

Meanwhile, we’re told that the Prince and Princess of Wales, who made a trip to Boston in December, have turned down a long list of prestigious interviews both in the United States and Britain to present their side with all proceeds going to royal charities.

King Charles — who gave a disastrous 1993 interview to Jonathan Dimbleby — in which he admitted to cheating on Princess Diana with his now-wife, Camilla Parker Bowles, is believed to have told all the family that nothing good can come from speaking out.

In a new trailer for Harry’s ITV interview with Tom Bradby, released Saturday, he revealed the “guilt” he felt over not being able to cry in front of weeping mourners at Kensington Palace after his mother’s death.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle emotionally recounted their exit from the royal family in their Netflix show, “Harry & Meghan”
Netflix

Prince Harry said that it was not until he watched his mother’s coffin being lowered into the ground on the Althorp Estate that he finally shed tears.

He also said that he thinks that William felt guilt as well about not crying alongside the crowds, saying: “Everyone knows where they were and what they were doing the night my mother died.

“I cried once, at the burial, and you know I go into detail about how strange it was and how, actually, there was some guilt that I felt, and I think William felt as well, by walking around the outside of Kensington Palace.

The royal family turned up en masse for Princess Kate’s carol service in December – all except Prince Harry and Meghan Markle
Getty Images

“There were 50,000 bouquets of flowers to our mother, and there we were shaking people’s hands, smiling. I’ve seen the videos, right, I looked back over it all. And the wet hands that we were shaking, we couldn’t understand why their hands were wet, but it was all the tears that they were wiping away.”

He adds: “Everyone thought, and felt like, they knew our mum, and the two closest people to her, the two most loved people by her, were unable to show any emotion in that moment.”

We have reached out to Buckingham Palace and Kensington Palace for comment.

Read original article here

Prince Harry envious of Will, Kate’s ‘magnificent’ palace apartment

An excerpt from Prince Harry’s bombshell new memoir, “Spare” reads like something out of the iconic 1970s British TV show “Upstairs, Downstairs” about a wealthy family and their servants — but with a royal twist.

Turns out Harry was green with envy over how luxuriously Prince William and Kate lived in their “magnificent” Kensington Palace apartment — while he and Meghan Markle made do early on in a cramped cottage with Ikea furniture.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle lived the tiny Nottingham Cottage early in their marriage.
Netflix

The Duke of Sussex complains in “Spare,” that his first home with Meghan, Nottingham Cottage, was a far cry from William and Kate’s lavish “Apartment 1A,” although they both are on the grounds of Kensington Palace, the Daily Mail reported.

“The wallpaper, the ceiling trim, the walnut bookshelves filled with volumes of peaceful colors, priceless works of art. Magnificent. Like a museum,” he wrote about Prince William’s digs.

Apartment 1A and “Nott Cott” are part of the Kensington Palace complex.
Getty Images

“We congratulated them on the renovation without holding back the compliments while feeling embarrassed of our IKEA lamps and the second-hand sofa we’d recently bought on sale with Meg’s credit card on sofa.com.”

Apartment 1A is said to have 20 rooms, and has long been William and Kate’s London base. The home was refurbished to the tune of $5 million of taxpayer money in 2016 but the couple paid for fixtures and furnishings themselves.

In contrast, Nottingham Cottage, or “Nott Cott,” where Harry and Meghan started married life, is a modest two-bedroom home — so small it reportedly shocked Oprah Winfrey when she visited them there for tea, the couple claimed in their recent Netflix documentary.

Prince William and Kate recently moved to Windsor with their three children.
WireImage
Harry’s memoir was accidentally published five days early in Spain.
Samir Hussein/WireImage

Winfrey told them “no one would ever believe” they were living there.

In their Netflix documentary, Meghan said: ‘People thought we lived in a palace and we did. Well, a cottage in a palace.’

Added Harry: “The whole thing is on a slight lean, [with] really low ceilings. So I don’t know who was there before but they must have been very short.”

Harry and Meghan later moved from Nott Cott for ten-bedroom Frogmore Cottage on the Queen’s Windsor Estate.

“Spare” accidentally went on sale in Spain in a Spanish translation last week ahead of its official release Jan. 10.

Read original article here

Meghan Markle ‘not welcome’ at Balmoral as Queen lay dying: Harry

Meghan Markle was banned from Balmoral by King Charles as Queen Elizabeth lay dying last year, Prince Harry confirmed in his bombshell new memoir, “Spare.”

Harry quickly defended Markle, telling his dad, “Don’t ever speak about my wife that way,” according to reports on the tome, which was accidentally released early in Spain.

“Charles told Harry that it wasn’t right or appropriate for Meghan to be in Balmoral at such a deeply sad time,’ a source said, according to the Daily Mail.

King Charles banned Meghan Markle from Balmoral as Queen Elizabeth was dying last year, according to Prince Harry’s memoir, “Spare.”
Tim Rooke/REX/Shutterstock

‘It was pointed out to him that Kate [Middleton] was not going and that the numbers really should be limited to the very closest family.”

Harry, 38, and Meghan, 41, were in London in September when the Queen’s health rapidly went downhill at Balmoral, her home in Scotland.

Harry quickly defended Markle, telling his dad, “Don’t ever speak about my wife that way,” according to his memoir.
i-Images / Polaris
King Charles and Prince William during Queen Elizabeth’s funeral.
REUTERS

Many of the senior royals immediately began planning to fly to Balmoral, including Prince William, along with Andrew, Edward, and his wife Sophie, the Daily Mail reported Saturday.

About 90 minutes after Buckingham Palace announced the Queen’s ill health, a rep for Harry and Meghan said they both would be traveling to Scotland — but hours later, a clarification was made that Harry would be going it alone.

‘It was pointed out to him [Prince Harry] that Kate [Middleton] was not going and that the numbers really should be limited to the very closest family.”
Getty Images

Harry says in his book that during that window of time, he was told by his father not to bring Meghan. Harry then flew by private jet to Scotland and arrived after the Queen had already died.

In addition, Harry writes in “Spare” that he learned of the Queen’s death after checking the BBC news website. 

Read original article here

I wasn’t Prince William’s best man

Prince Harry claims in his leaked new memoir “Spare” that he was never really the best man at Prince William’s 2011 wedding and it was a stunt for the media.

To the outside world, Prince Harry was the official best man and even drove with then-Prince Charles and William to Westminster Abbey in a Bentley that day, according to the Daily Mail.

But Harry said it was all an act and it was two of Prince William’s best friends, James Meade and Thomas Van Straubenzee, who gave the traditional speech at the reception.

To the outside world, Prince Harry was the official best man and even drove with then-Prince Charles and William to Westminster Abbey in a Bentley that day, according to the Daily Mail.
Getty Images

Harry also writes about how Prince William was meeting and greeting people who had assembled on the Mall by Buckingham Palace while “tipsy on last night’s rum” just hours before his wedding to Kate. 

Harry claims he said to his brother: “You smell of alcohol,” before he offered him mints as he lowered the windows of the car.

Prince Harry claims in his memoir “Spare” that he was never really the best man at Prince William’s 2011 wedding.
AFP/Getty Images
Harry wrote that Prince William’s best friends, James Meade and Thomas Van Straubenzee, gave the traditional speech at the reception.
AFP via Getty Images

“Spare” is set to hit shelves in the US market on Jan. 10. Leaked excerpts have begun spilling out since the book was released by accident in Spain three days ago.

The memoir is dedicated to Harry’s wife, Meghan Markle, their children Archie and Lilibet, and his late mother Princess Diana.

Read original article here