Tag Archives: Rob Portman

Live updates | Voters to decide Ohio’s heated Senate primary

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Ohio Republicans voted Tuesday in one of the most contentious and closely watched Senate primaries in the U.S., deciding a race that is an early referendum on former President Donald Trump’s hold on the GOP as the midterm primary season kicks into high gear.

Author and venture capitalist JD Vance is well-positioned in the Republican race to replace retiring Sen. Rob Portman after receiving Trump’s late-stage support, capping a bitter and expensive contest that, at one point, saw two candidates nearly come to blows on a debate stage. The winner is likely to face 10-term Democratic Rep. Tim Ryan, who has distanced himself from the progressive wing of his party ahead of what is expected to be a difficult year for Democrats seeking to hold their congressional majorities.

Incumbent Republican Gov. Mike DeWine appears on track to secure his party’s nomination for another term, despite backlash from conservatives over COVID-19 shutdowns and mandates. Meanwhile, in Indiana, more than a dozen state House members are trying to hold off Republican primary challengers who want to push the Legislature further to the right.

This marks the first multistate contest of the 2022 campaign and comes in the wake of a draft opinion that suggests the U.S. Supreme Court could be poised to overturn the 1973 landmark Roe v. Wade case that legalized abortion nationwide. Such a decision could have a dramatic impact on the course of the midterms, when control of Congress, governor’s mansions and key elections offices are at stake.

The primaries also serve as a clarifying test of Trump’s influence in his party. A Vance victory would likely embolden Trump to keep asserting himself in primary campaigns ahead of another potential presidential run. A setback, however, would raise questions about whether GOP voters are seeking a new direction, especially in a state he won twice by margins of 8 percentage points.

At the Strongsville library in suburban Cleveland, 84—year-old George Clark said he voted for Vance based on Trump’s endorsement.

“I know he’s had some bad press, but I know he’s a conservative and I always vote for conservatives.” Clark said.

But Joanne Mondak, 71, said she voted for state Sen. Matt Dolan, the only major candidate who did not aggressively court Trump. The rest of the field, she said, are “nutcakes” who are “too much Trump.”

Trump reminded Ohio voters Tuesday his stake in the race.

Calling into a Columbus radio show, Trump praised Vance, and defended him for once calling himself a “never Trump guy.” Vance has since become “a very pro-Trump and America First” supporter.

Vance was trailing in the polls until the former president backed the “Hillbilly Elegy” author and one-time Trump critic in a contest that revolved largely around him. While the timing of Trump’s endorsement — less than three weeks before Election Day and as early voting was already underway — may have dulled its impact, it was a major blow to former Ohio Treasurer Josh Mandel, Cleveland investment banker Mike Gibbons and former Ohio Republican Party Chair Jane Timken, who had all gone to elaborate lengths to court Trump and his voters.

The race will also go down as the most expensive in state history, with more than $66 million in TV and radio spending alone, according to the Columbus-based Medium Buying firm.

Ohio, once a bellwether state, is now decidedly Republican, posing a challenge for Ryan, who is heavily favored to win his three-way Democratic primary against progressive Morgan Harper, a former consumer protection attorney, and Columbus activist and tech exec Traci Johnson. The longtime congressman and 2020 presidential candidate has fashioned himself as a blue-collar crusader fighting for working families as he has campaigned dressed in sweatshirts and baseball caps.

“He’s passionate about fighting for the people of Ohio,” said Michigan Sen. Gary Peters, who leads the Democrats’ Senate campaign arm. “The only person that Republican candidate(s) seem to care about is Donald Trump and whether or not Donald Trump will endorse them.”

Buoyed by historical trends and Democratic President Joe Biden’s deep unpopularity, Republicans are optimistic about retaking the House and Senate come November. A new president’s party almost always loses in seats in subsequent midterm elections and Republicans hope soaring inflation, high energy prices and lingering frustrations over the country’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic will further boost their prospects.

Democrats, meanwhile, are banking the GOP — with Trump’s help — will elect candidates so extreme they prove unelectable come November. A Supreme Court decision on abortion could also galvanize traditional Democratic voters.

“By all rights, history tells us that the Democrats are going to lose control of the House,” said Dale Butland, a Democratic strategist in Ohio. “By all rights, we should lose control of the Senate, too. However, the only thing that could save us is if the Republicans nominate a bunch of far-right crazies that are unacceptable in a general election.”

While DeWine is strongly positioned to win a second term, he is expected to face considerable conservative backlash for the aggressive COVID-19 mandates he imposed during the first year of the pandemic. DeWine’s three opponents — former U.S. Rep. Jim Renacci, former state Rep. Ron Hood and farmer Joe Blystone — have all tapped into that anger, but they are likely to split the far-right vote. Still, DeWine isn’t taking chances and has poured millions into advertising during the race’s final weeks. Trump-backed Secretary of State Frank LaRose in also considered well positioned to win.

On the Democratic side, Nan Whaley, the former mayor of Dayton, is vying to become Ohio’s first woman elected governor in her race against ex-Cincinnati Mayor John Cranley. Whaley has the support of U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown, a popular household name and the state’s top Democrat. Cranley has the backing of feminist icon Gloria Steinem.

In the House, Republican Max Miller, a former Trump campaign and White House aide, is expected to cruise to the GOP nomination in the sprawling new 7th District in northeast Ohio, despite allegations from his ex-girlfriend, former White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham, that he grew violent with her as their relationship deteriorated. He has denied the charges.

Miller was initially recruited to challenge Republican Rep. Anthony Gonzalez, one of the 10 House Republicans who voted in favor of Trump’s impeachment. But Gonzalez chose to retire instead.

For Democrats, a rematch pitting one of the left’s rising stars against a new House incumbent will provide another litmus test of the progressive movement’s rustbelt clout. Rep. Shontel Brown is again facing progressive activist and former state Sen. Nina Turner, whom she defeated in a special election last year.

___

Colvin reported from Washington. Associated Press writers Patrick Orsagas in Columbus, Steve Peoples in New York and Mark Gillispie in Strongsville, Ohio, contributed to this report.

___

Follow AP for full coverage of the midterms at https://apnews.com/hub/2022-midterm-elections and on Twitter, https://twitter.com/ap_politics



Read original article here

Trump’s push for Russian dirt on Biden is latest GOP headache

Republicans are finding themselves on defense again after former President TrumpDonald TrumpTrump says he’s uninterested in being Speaker if GOP retakes House Perdue says he ‘misunderstood’ Trump supporters’ ‘lock him up’ chants about Kemp Jared Kushner expected to sit for interview with Jan. 6 panel this week: reports MORE urged Russian President Vladimir PutinVladimir Vladimirovich PutinRussian internet regulator announces fines against Google for ‘dissemination of false content’ Putin’s actions in Ukraine are spilling north Ukraine fighting Russian Goliath: Why dictators are so bad at war MORE to release dirt on the Biden family. 

The remarks are the latest Trump-fueled headache for Republicans this week and the most recent entry in a years-long fissure between Trump and many congressional Republicans over Russia.

Trump’s comments also come at a politically awkward moment for GOP lawmakers trying to push the Biden administration to do more in response to Putin’s weeks-long, bloody invasion of Ukraine.  

“My message to Putin is he needs to go,” said Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamSusan Collins to make Supreme Court decision ‘relatively soon’ No. 2 GOP senator to oppose Supreme Court nominee Romney planning ‘a much deeper dive’ on Jackson after opposing her for appeals court MORE (R-S.C.), who has remained close to Trump since he left office last year, when asked about the former president’s comments.  

Asked if he thought making the remark was appropriate, Graham added: “That would not be something that I would do, no.” 

Sen. John ThuneJohn Randolph ThuneManchin shoots down Biden’s new billionaire tax plan  Schumer says Thomas should recuse himself No. 2 GOP senator to oppose Supreme Court nominee MORE (S.D.), the No. 2 Senate Republican, said, “We have very little control over what the former president says, obviously.”

“You know, there are a lot of voices out there right now, and you have to stay focused on the goal and that is to give the Ukrainians whatever they need to succeed and be victorious. And I think that’s actually a possibility,” Thune added, asked if it stepped on Senate Republicans’ message on Russia.

Trump set off alarm bells on Tuesday night when he said in an interview that he thought Putin should release any information he might have on Hunter Biden, President BidenJoe BidenTrump says he’s uninterested in being Speaker if GOP retakes House Biden administration boosts support for antitrust efforts Energy & Environment — Oil companies rebuff House chairman MORE‘s son.

“One thing, while I’m on your show, as long as Putin now is not exactly a fan of our country, let him explain, where did — because Chris WallaceChristopher (Chris) WallaceChris Wallace: Working at Fox had become ‘unsustainable’ WarnerMedia merger approved by Discovery’s shareholders CNN announces streaming service launch date MORE wouldn’t let me ask the question — why did the mayor of Moscow’s wife give the Bidens, both of them, $3.5 million dollars? That’s a lot of money,” Trump told John Solomon and Amanda Head on “Just the News” on the Real America’s Voice network.

Trump added that, “I would think Putin would know the answer to that. I think he should release it.” 

Trump was referencing a controversial 2020 Senate GOP report on President Biden and Hunter Biden that resulted in little proof of wrongdoing. He doubled down on his comments on Wednesday, saying that “Russia may be willing to give that information.”  

Solomon, a former employee of The Hill, faced scrutiny for his opinion columns during Trump’s first impeachment in 2019 relating to Ukraine. The Hill subsequently launched a review of those columns.

Democrats made the case at the time that Trump abused his power by trying to pressure Ukraine to open an investigation into the Bidens, including linking a probe to assistance.

Not all Republicans distanced themselves from Trump’s comments. 

“If he believes Vladimir Putin has information a crime has been committed, you know, sure, why not?” said Sen. Kevin CramerKevin John CramerBipartisan group of senators requests specifics on defense aid provided to Ukraine Energy & Environment — Interior to continue oil leasing plans Republican senators introduce bill to ban Russian uranium imports MORE (R-N.D.), asked if Trump’s comments were appropriate.  

But it’s hardly the first Russia-related headache for the GOP in response to Trump, which has been a running point of contention between the former president, who remains the de facto leader of the party, and congressional Republicans.

The GOP-controlled Congress enacted new sanctions on Russia in 2017 over initial objections from the Trump administration. And more recently, Trump sparked pushback, including from regular Capitol Hill allies, when he called Putin “savvy” and a “genius.”

“I do not think anything savvy or genius about Putin,” said House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthyKevin McCarthyJD Vance: Greene ‘did nothing wrong’ by attending white nationalist conference Defense & National Security — Officials skeptical Russia reducing military campaign Lawmakers pay tribute to late GOP Rep. Don Young lying in state in Capitol MORE (R-Calif.), in a rare break. 

“I think Putin is evil. I think he’s a dictator. I think he’s murdering people right now,” McCarthy added. 

Trump also appeared to relitigate those comments in his statement on Wednesday, saying that he was calling Putin a “genius” for building up troops along the Russia-Ukraine border before its invasion “because I assumed he would be easily able to negotiate a great deal for Russia.” 

Trump’s latest comments come as Republicans are already facing questions this week over whether they communicated with him on Jan. 6, 2021, when a mob of the then-president’s supporters breached the Capitol and disrupted the counting of the 2020 Electoral College results for hours. 

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellJD Vance: Greene ‘did nothing wrong’ by attending white nationalist conference Defense & National Security — Officials skeptical Russia reducing military campaign McConnell sidesteps question on Jan. 6 call from Trump MORE (R-Ky.) got questions at a weekly press conference about a call Trump made to him, and that he declined to answer, on the day of the attack. 

“I’ve said repeatedly the last time I spoke to the president was the day after the Electoral College declared President Biden the winner. I publicly congratulated President Biden on his victory and received a phone call after that from President Trump, and that’s the last time we’ve spoken,” McConnell said when asked why he did not take Trump’s call.

Congressional Republicans also offered a split-screen to Trump on Russia Wednesday, when Sens. Rob PortmanRobert (Rob) Jones PortmanBennet, Portman introduce bill to use seized Russian assets for Ukrainian relief The Memo: Biden tries to retract his gift to Putin The Hill’s Morning Report – Biden: `No’ policy for Russia regime change MORE (R-Ohio) and Dick DurbinDick DurbinSchumer says Thomas should recuse himself Ketanji Brown Jackson and the burden of firstness Manchin: GOP treatment of Jackson ‘disgraceful,’ ’embarrassing’ MORE (D-Ill.), the co-chairs of the Senate Ukraine Caucus, met with members of Ukraine’s parliament.  

“I am grateful for the opportunity to meet with members of the Ukraine parliament today. America is inspired by their courage and the bravery of the Ukrainian people to fight back against Russian aggression,” Portman said after the meeting, adding that the administration should do more faster on sanctions and lethal aid.

Republicans also predicted that whatever comes from Trump’s latest comments, like much of what the president says, is largely out of their control. 

“I don’t know how I would answer that. That will be like things involving him, it will unfurl,” Sen. Mike BraunMichael BraunJudge Ketanji Brown Jackson: Without fear or favor Braun walks back remarks criticizing SCOTUS ruling that legalized interracial marriage Senate GOP eyes Hunter Biden, Fauci probes after midterms  MORE (R-Ind.) said about whether Trump’s comments were appropriate, adding that it was “out of my control.”



Read original article here

Five things to know about Ukraine’s President Zelensky

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is fast becoming a national and global hero as he attempts to rally his country in the face of invading Russian forces.  

The former actor and comedian has released a series of videos in recent days urging Ukrainians to take up arms and reiterating his own refusal to flee despite being a top Kremlin target. 

“I am here. We will not lay down any weapons. We will defend our state, because our weapons are our truth,” he said in a video message. 

Zelensky on Sunday said that Russia and Ukraine have entered the beginning stages of peace talks.

Here are five things to know about the Ukrainian leader.

Entertainment was path to prominence 

Zelensky is Jewish and grew up in the southeastern part of Ukraine. His grandfather fought for the Soviet Union during World War II, while some other family members died during the Holocaust. 

Upon graduating with a law degree, Zelensky entered the world of entertainment, beginning his career as an actor and comedian. 

Zelensky rose to prominence as a star on the popular Ukrainian television program “Servant of the People,” where he portrayed a beloved high school teacher who showed disdain for corrupt politicians and ended up becoming president of the country. 

Zelensky also competed on Ukraine’s version of “Dancing with the Stars” in 2006, and clips of his routines have gone viral on social media. 

Campaigned on peace with Russia

Zelensky was elected president in 2019 after running on a campaign promising to negotiate peace with Russia and reduce the power of corrupt oligarchs who control much of Ukraine’s economy. 

Although he successfully negotiated a prisoner swap with pro-Russian separatists early in his presidency, diplomacy with Moscow stalled due to Russian President Vladimir PutinVladimir Vladimirovich PutinCyber officials urge federal agencies to armor up for potential Russian attacks Rick Scott: Putin a ‘murderous thug,’ will ‘continue to try to swallow up more and more territory’ Biden says Putin is ‘producing the exact opposite effect that he intended’ MORE’s demands that Ukraine stay out of Western alliances. 

As tensions have escalated between Kyiv and Ukraine, Putin had accused Zelensky’s government of being a pawn of the West. 

Russia seized the Crimean Peninsula in 2014, leading to the creation of two pro-Russian separatist regions and beginning an eight-year conflict that left 15,000 people dead. 

Played key role in Trump impeachment

Zelensky become a household name in the U.S. for the role he played in the first impeachment of former President TrumpDonald TrumpTrump tears into Biden as he moves toward 2024 campaign Former Trump national security adviser condemns Putin at CPAC GOP senator dodges question over whether Trump should condemn Putin MORE

During a 2019 phone conservation, Trump urged Zelensky to help investigate then-presidential candidate Joe BidenJoe BidenTrump tears into Biden as he moves toward 2024 campaign Biden says he hopes his legacy ‘is that I restored the soul of this country’ Cyber officials urge federal agencies to armor up for potential Russian attacks MORE and his son Hunter Biden, who served on the board of a Ukrainian natural gas company. 

The phone call with Zelensky led Trump to be impeached by the House for using his office for political gain, as he also withheld $400 million in authorized military support for Ukraine.

Zelensky later said he did not want to get into the politics of other countries, refusing to criticize the call with Trump. 

Criticized US warnings, response ahead of invasion

Amid the run-up to the invasion, Zelensky criticized the Biden administration’s urgent warnings about Putin’s plans, worrying they could unnecessarily stoke panic.

Zelensky’s administration also complained the U.S. did not do more to protect Ukraine from the initial invasion such as bolstering its military forces and speeding up its application to be a NATO member. 

The U.S. and its NATO allies issued firm warnings to Russia to deter an invasion and in the past week have issued harsh sanctions against Russian officials and banks.

Zelenky also reportedly shot down an offer from the U.S. to evacuate him from Ukraine on Saturday, saying he needed more ammunition, not a ride. 

Garnered broad support from U.S. lawmakers 

As Russian troops advance on key cities, Zelensky has seen vocal support from U.S. lawmakers across the political spectrum. 

“Zelensky is a bigger man than Putin. The whole world knows. Russian army knows. Even the dictator’s cronies know,” Sen. Ben SasseBen SasseKinzinger rips House Republicans’ ‘damn awful’ anti-Biden tweet Defense & National Security: US, allies hit Russia with sanctions Biden, allies launch sanctions against Russia MORE (R-Neb.) wrote in a tweet. 

Sen. Amy KlobucharAmy Klobuchar Sunday shows preview: Russia invades Ukraine; Biden nominates Jackson to Supreme Court Democrats call for B in election security grants in upcoming budget Democratic Senate debates merits of passion vs. pragmatism MORE (D-Minn.) tweeted a video of Zelensky addressing citizens from the streets of Kyiv. 

During an appearance on NBC’s “Meet The Press,” Sen. Rob PortmanRobert (Rob) Jones Portman Sunday shows preview: Russia invades Ukraine; Biden nominates Jackson to Supreme Court Three senators endorse Timken in Ohio GOP Senate primary All eyes on Trump as Timken gains momentum in Ohio MORE (R-Ohio) told host Chuck ToddCharles (Chuck) David ToddSan Francisco mayor says ‘we failed our children’ after ouster of school board members Former ambassador: ‘Ukraine has a gun to its head’ Blinken defends not placing more sanctions on Russia ahead of possible Ukraine invasion MORE that he has seen strong signs of unity for Ukraine, as 40 rallies were held across the country in solidarity for the country. 

“The world is standing up, frankly, in ways I haven’t seen since 9/11,” Portman told Todd.



Read original article here

Rand Paul threatens to block Ukraine-Russia resolution 

Sen. Rand PaulRandal (Rand) Howard PaulPortman backs Timken as successor in Ohio Must-watch moments between Fauci and Sen. Paul Website that raised millions for ‘Freedom Convoy’ protests goes offline after possible hack MORE (R-Ky.) warned on Thursday that he will block quick passage of a symbolic resolution supporting Ukraine and sending a warning to Russia unless it incorporates changes he wants. 

“We have some amendments to it. We believe that it should say nothing in this resolution is to be construed as an authorization of war and nothing in this resolution is to be construed as authorizing the use of troops into Ukraine,” Paul said. 

Paul said that he offered the amendments to sponsors of the resolution on Wednesday night but they were rejected. He said that he would object to quickly passing the resolution if it doesn’t incorporate his amendments.

Because the bipartisan group is trying to pass the resolution by unanimous consent, they need buy-in from every senator to allow the resolution to pass quickly. 

Sen. Rob PortmanRobert (Rob) Jones PortmanPortman backs Timken as successor in Ohio Senators eye Plan B amid Russia sanctions stalemate Putin’s Ukraine gambit unites Western democracies he sought to divide MORE (R-Ohio) said that he was in talks with Paul. 

“We’re working through it,” Portman said.

Portman and Sens. Jeanne ShaheenCynthia (Jeanne) Jeanne ShaheenPavlich: It was always spying US, allies warn time running out for diplomacy with Russia Senators introduce a resolution honoring Tom Brady’s career MORE (D-N.H.), Dick DurbinDick DurbinOvernight Defense & National Security — US officials accuse Russia of lying GOP senator opposes Biden court pick, likely blocking nominee Senate leaders send Putin symbolic warning shot amid invasion fears MORE (D-Ill.), John CornynJohn CornynSenate seeks offramp as funding deadline nears White House brushing off Graham handicapping of high court choice Democrats show little appetite for Biden’s call for gun control MORE (R-Texas), James Risch (R-Idaho) and Bob MenendezRobert (Bob) MenendezSenators eye Plan B amid Russia sanctions stalemate To counter Russian gas, look to the Eastern Mediterranean Why the debate over SALT deductions matters MORE (D-N.J.) offered the resolution.

Beyond offering support for Ukraine, the resolution “denounces the Russian military buildup of over 150,000 troops on Ukraine’s border” and signals that President BidenJoe BidenTrump-nominated FAA administrator to resign at end of March Senate slips within 48 hours of government shutdown deadline Trump issues endorsements in Texas congressional races MORE should impose sanctions if Russia invades Ukraine.

“[The Senate] encourages the President that, should any further invasion or other malign activity to undermine the sovereignty of Ukraine occur by Russia, the United States Government should exhaust all tools at its disposal to impose significant costs on the Russian Federation to restore peace in Europe,” it states.



Read original article here

Senators reach bipartisan deal on cryptocurrency amendment 

Republican Sens. Pat ToomeyPatrick (Pat) Joseph ToomeyBlack women look to build upon gains in coming elections Watch live: GOP senators present new infrastructure proposal Sasse rebuked by Nebraska Republican Party over impeachment vote MORE (Pa.) and Cynthia LummisCynthia Marie LummisThe Senate should support innovation and pass the Lummis-Wyden-Toomey amendment The “compromise” crypto amendment is no compromise at all Hillicon Valley: Cryptocurrency clash complicate’s infrastructure bill’s path forward | FTC hits Facebook over ‘inaccurate’ explanation for banning researchers | Yelp to allow filtering for business requiring vaccination MORE (Wyo.) said an amendment to the infrastructure bill that would redefine who falls subject to cryptocurrency regulation requirements will be brought for a unanimous consent vote on Monday afternoon after a group  of bipartisan senators and the Treasury Department came to an agreement.

The amendment, which will be co-sponsored by Sens. Mark WarnerMark Robert WarnerThe Senate should support innovation and pass the Lummis-Wyden-Toomey amendment The “compromise” crypto amendment is no compromise at all Hillicon Valley: Cryptocurrency clash complicate’s infrastructure bill’s path forward | FTC hits Facebook over ‘inaccurate’ explanation for banning researchers | Yelp to allow filtering for business requiring vaccination MORE (D-Va.), Rob PortmanRobert (Rob) Jones PortmanThe Senate should support innovation and pass the Lummis-Wyden-Toomey amendment Republicans renew intraparty battle over trillion-dollar spending The “compromise” crypto amendment is no compromise at all MORE (R-Ohio) and Kyrsten SinemaKyrsten SinemaSenate votes to end debate on T infrastructure bill McConnell urges Biden to withdraw embattled ATF nominee The “compromise” crypto amendment is no compromise at all MORE (D-Ariz.), seeks to amend the definition of a “broker” in the underlying infrastructure bill in a way that would keep software developers and transaction validators from being subject to the new reporting requirements. 

Notably, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron WydenRonald (Ron) Lee WydenSenate votes to end debate on T infrastructure bill GOP senator vows to slow-walk T infrastructure bill, sparking standoff The Senate should support innovation and pass the Lummis-Wyden-Toomey amendment MORE (D-Ore.), who was a leading force in the charge to amend the definition, is not sponsoring the amendment. Wyden signaled he would not oppose the amendment, tweeting that it is “certainly better than the underlying bill.”

“We’ve been working hard to get a deal. I don’t believe the cryptocurrency amendment language on offer is good enough to protect privacy and security, but it’s certainly better than the underlying bill. Majority Leader [Charles] Schumer [D-N.Y.] says he won’t block a unanimous consent request on it,” Wyden tweeted shortly before the deal was announced.  

Toomey said senators will put forward the amendment this afternoon.

It would take just one senator to block a vote on the compromised amendment, leaving the underlying infrastructure bill with the language fiercely opposed by the cryptocurrency industry based on arguments that it would call for developers and so-called miners to report information to tax collectors that they don’t have access to.

Wyden had put forward an amendment last week with Toomey and Lummis with broader exemptions laid out to limit who would be subject to the reporting requirements.

The amendment pitted the Democratic finance chair against the Biden administration.

The administration chose to back a competing bill that Warner, Portman and Sinema proposed with more narrow cryptocurrency regulation exemptions.

“While we each would have drafted this solution differently, we all agree it’s important to ensure that these obligations are properly crafted to apply only to entities that are regularly effectuating transactions of digital assets in exchange for consideration. To best memorialize this common understanding, we propose to incorporate this important amendment into the infrastructure bill and urge our colleagues to join us in enacting this bipartisan clarification,” Toomey, Warner Lummis, Sinema and Portman said in a joint statement.

A spokesperson for the Treasury Department confirmed the department was consulted and does not oppose the amendment.

A sticking point Toomey and Lummis had with the competing Warner-Portman-Sinema proposal was that the amendment had included parameters based on different technologies used to validate cryptocurrency transactions. 

The compromise bill does not include language that regulates based on the technology used to validate transactions.

Cryptocurrency industry leaders had fiercely pushed back on the Warner, Portman and Sinema amendment, but on Monday said the new compromise amendment was a better fix to issues they had with the broad “broker” definition in the underlying bill and urged senators to support it.

Jerry Brito, executive director for Coin Center, said that the amendment “sufficiently” defines brokers in a way that “it would be difficult to argue it covers protocol devs who only write and publish code.”

“That all said, there is a lot of work left to be done. While this is better than the base text, the provision still has other issues besides the ‘broker’ definition,” Brito tweeted.

Kristin Smith, executive director of the Block Chain Association, similarly offered measured support for the amendment.

“This isn’t perfect, but better than the underlying bill. More work to do, but the Senate should move to adopt this language today,” Smith tweeted.

The association had urged supporters last week to call senators to oppose the Warner, Portman and Sinema amendment.

Toomey and Lummis also told reporters that their support of the amendment does not mean that they will support the underlying infrastructure bill, which they said they oppose for reasons unrelated to the cryptocurrency regulation.



Read original article here

White House backs senators pushing for stricter crypto reporting rules

U.S. President Joe Biden returns to the White House on August 02, 2021 in Washington, DC. President Biden is returning from a weekend trip to Camp David.

Kevin Dietsch | Getty Images

The White House weighed in – somewhat out of the blue – on a contentious battle over competing crypto amendments to the $1 trillion infrastructure bill. It’s chosen to back the side that isn’t as friendly to the world of bitcoin and ethereum.

The fight is over a provision in the bipartisan bill, which raises money through stricter tax rules on cryptocurrency transactions. Crypto advocates argue that the language in the legislation, which requires brokers of digital assets to report on crypto trading gains, is vague and too broad. And now, amendments are circulating in order to narrow the scope.

On Wednesday, Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., Pat Toomey, R-Pa., and Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo. introduced an amendment that drills down on the definition of a “broker,” explicitly excluding validators, hardware and software makers as well as protocol developers. It would be a win for the crypto caucus, should it pass.

In the other camp sits Sens. Rob Portman, R-Ohio – who drafted the original tax provision – along with Mark Warner, D-Va. and Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz. They submitted their own rival amendment on Thursday. CNBC does not have a copy of the proposed Portman-Warner amendment.

But based on prior revisions described by Portman, some believe it will leave the door open to a broader definition of “crypto broker” and will potentially subject more crypto investors to these higher taxes.

CNBC Politics

Read more of CNBC’s politics coverage:

No one was expecting President Joe Biden to volunteer his take on this one, but late Thursday, the White House formally backed Portman’s amendment in a statement attributed to deputy press secretary Andrew Bates.

“The Administration is pleased with the progress that has yielded a compromise sponsored by Senators Warner, Portman, and Sinema to advance the bipartisan infrastructure package and clarify the measure to reduce tax evasion in the cryptocurrency market,” wrote Bates.

“The Administration believes this provision will strengthen tax compliance in this emerging area of finance and ensure that high income taxpayers are contributing what they owe under the law. We are grateful to Chairman Wyden for his leadership in pushing the Senate to address this issue, however we believe that the alternative amendment put forward by Senators Warner, Portman, and Sinema strikes the right balance and makes an important step forward in promoting tax compliance.”

The last-minute endorsement of the Portman amendment was unexpected but not surprising.

Since its inception, the White House’s vision for the infrastructure bill has been one in which corporations and the wealthiest Americans would fund improvements that benefitted everyone.

But Senate Republicans have a different idea, and over the past three months, they have cut tax hikes out of the bill one by one.

The crypto reporting rules and their related taxes represent the last vestiges of the corporate tax hikes that were supposed to pay for the bill.

Should the Portman camp win, Blockchain Association executive director Kristin Smith warns the ramifications will be sweeping and massively damaging to the country’s crypto industry.

Read more about cryptocurrencies from CNBC Pro

“At the eleventh hour, Sen. Warner has filed an amendment that is anti-technology and anti-innovation – and would be disastrous for the U.S. crypto ecosystem,” wrote Smith.

“Removing protections for software developers – what Senator Warner’s amendment aims to do and that is defined in the Wyden-Lummis-Toomey amendment – is a negative catalyst that will force crypto development and innovation out of the U.S. to friendlier, pro-technology jurisdictions,” continued Smith.

The blowback to the White House’s endorsement of the Portman-led amendment has been swift and harsh. Wyden, a liberal Democrat, and Lummis, a conservative Republican, have both pushed back, with Lummis issuing a direct call to action.

“We NEED you,” tweeted Lummis. “Pls call your Senators. Pls tweet. Pls email. We are facing major headwinds on the Wyden-Lummis-Toomey amendment. Burying financial innovation in red tape & sending devs + miners on info collection wild goose chases for info they don’t know is horrible policy.”

The Senate plans to vote Saturday on the bipartisan infrastructure bill.

— CNBC’s Tanaya Macheel contributed to this report.



Read original article here

White House: GOP has ‘struggled to articulate a reason’ to oppose infrastructure plan

The White House said Saturday that Republicans have “struggled to articulate a reason” to oppose President BidenJoe BidenJobs report adds to Biden momentum White House says bills are bipartisan even if GOP doesn’t vote for them Trump calls for boycott of MLB for moving All-Star Game MORE’s $2.25 trillion infrastructure plan.

In a White House memo obtained by The Hill, adviser Anita Dunn touted growing momentum for Biden’s proposal, citing positive reports from bond credit rating company Moody’s, and growing support from climate experts, economists and others. 

Republicans, however, have criticized the proposal’s price tag, arguing that it advances progressive agenda priorities unrelated to infrastructure.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellWhite House says bills are bipartisan even if GOP doesn’t vote for them Officer slain in vehicle attack at Capitol identified Overnight Defense: 1 officer dead, 1 injured after car rams Capitol barrier | Army suspends multiple service members over sexual assault allegations MORE (Ky.), said on Wednesday that “the latest liberal wish-list the White House has decided to label ‘infrastructure’ is a major missed opportunity by this Administration.”

Other members of the GOP have railed against Biden’s plan to spend billions on electric vehicles, a corporate tax increase and other measures to combat climate change that are included in the proposal. 

In Saturday’s memo, Dunn said that Republicans have struggled to articulate a reason to oppose a plan that has support from the public. 

“In the face of massive support from the public, it’s no surprise that Republicans have struggled to articulate a reason to oppose the President’s plan. And in trying to attack the President’s proposal, Republicans have had to run away from their own record of supporting critical investments in our infrastructure,” Dunn wrote.

“And while President Biden plans to more than pay for this plan by asking big corporations to pay their fair share, Republican lawmakers have been quick to come to the defense of multinational companies,” Dunn continued.

Biden unveiled the plan in Pittsburgh on Wednesday, which aims to repair 20,000 miles of road, 10,000 bridges, expand broadband access to rural and underserved communities, replace the nation’s lead and service pipelines to ensure clean water, invest in research and development and manufacturing and expand access to home and community-based care.

The president proposes to fund the plan over 15 years by raising the corporate tax rate from 21 percent to 28 percent.

Dunn noted that in a recent poll conducted by Morning Consult and Politico, 1 in 2 voters said they approved of an infrastructure plan funded by raising taxes on wealthy Americans and corporations.  

But amid zero support from the GOP and a 50-50 Senate, it is likely that Democrats will have to push the legislation through Congress through budget reconciliation, a process which allows the Senate to bypass the 60-vote filibuster. 

The Biden administration announced this week that it hopes the plan will be passed by the summer. 

Morgan Chalfant contributed to this report 



Read original article here

Senate GOP faces retirement brain drain

Senate Republicans are facing a brain drain as some of the caucus’s biggest dealmakers prepare to head for the exits. 

Sen. Roy BluntRoy Dean BluntDemocratic Marine veteran jumps into Missouri Senate race after Blunt retirement Trump praises retiring Blunt, who opposed his conviction The Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by the National Shooting Sports Foundation – CDC news on gatherings a step toward normality MORE’s (R-Mo.) announcement this week that he will not run for reelection is the latest blow for the GOP’s governing wing of the Senate, a coalition of policy wonks and bipartisan-minded institutionalists who have been at the center of the biggest legislative accomplishments. 

Though the membership of Congress is always in flux — a third of the Senate is up every two years and the full House every two — the turnover amongst some of the most successful GOP negotiators is particularly acute. 

“There’s a lot of experience, a lot of knowledge leaving. … It’s a loss of a lot of institutional memory,” said Sen. John CornynJohn CornynThe Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by the National Shooting Sports Foundation – Relief bill to become law; Cuomo in trouble GOP stumbles give Democrats new hope in Texas Senate holds longest vote in history as Democrats scramble to save relief bill MORE (R-Texas), an adviser to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellTrump praises retiring Blunt, who opposed his conviction The Hill’s 12:30 Report – Presented by Johns Hopkins University – Trump’s relationship with GOP worsens Dozens of Trump appointees ‘burrow’ into Biden government MORE (R-Ky.).

In addition to Blunt, Sens. Richard ShelbyRichard Craig ShelbyThe Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by the National Shooting Sports Foundation – CDC news on gatherings a step toward normality Blunt retirement shakes up Missouri Senate race These GOP senators aren’t seeking reelection in 2022 MORE (R-Ala.), Rob PortmanRobert (Rob) Jones PortmanThe Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by the National Shooting Sports Foundation – CDC news on gatherings a step toward normality Blunt’s retirement deals blow to McConnell inner circle Trump ramps up battle with Republican leadership MORE (R-Ohio), Pat ToomeyPatrick (Pat) Joseph ToomeySasse rebuked by Nebraska Republican Party over impeachment vote Philly GOP commissioner on censures: ‘I would suggest they censure Republican elected officials who are lying’ Toomey censured by several Pennsylvania county GOP committees over impeachment vote MORE (R-Pa.) and Richard BurrRichard Mauze BurrThe Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by the National Shooting Sports Foundation – CDC news on gatherings a step toward normality Blunt’s retirement deals blow to McConnell inner circle Trump ramps up battle with Republican leadership MORE (R-N.C.) are all expected to retire at the end of 2022. 

Each holds a top GOP committee spot. Blunt and Shelby, in particular, are known for their ability to craft deals; Portman and Toomey are well versed in policy and Burr has earned the respect of Democrats for his work as Intelligence Committee chairman. 

Other GOP senators seen as dealmakers have also left the Senate in recent years. 

Former Sens. Lamar AlexanderLamar AlexanderThe Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by the National Shooting Sports Foundation – CDC news on gatherings a step toward normality Blunt’s retirement deals blow to McConnell inner circle Roy Blunt won’t run for Senate seat in 2022 MORE (R-Tenn.) and Pat RobertsCharles (Pat) Patrick RobertsRoy Blunt won’t run for Senate seat in 2022 Lobbying world Pat Roberts joins lobbying firm weeks after Senate retirement MORE (R-Kan.) — two GOP chairmen with big bipartisan accomplishments — retired at the end of 2020. Former Sen. Johnny IsaksonJohnny IsaksonLoeffler leaves door open to 2022 rematch against Warnock Perdue on potential 2022 run: GOP must regain the Senate Bottom line MORE (R-Ga.) stepped down in 2019 due to health reasons. 

The end of 2018 saw the departure of former Sens. Orrin HatchOrrin Grant HatchHow President Biden can hit a home run Mellman: What happened after Ginsburg? Bottom line MORE (R-Utah), then the chairman of the Finance Committee; Bob CorkerRobert (Bob) Phillips CorkerRoy Blunt won’t run for Senate seat in 2022 It’s time for Biden’s Cuba GOP lawmaker patience runs thin with Trump tactics MORE (R-Tenn.), then the chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee; and Jeff FlakeJeffrey (Jeff) Lane FlakeFormer GOP lawmaker: Republican Party ‘engulfed in lies and fear’ Grassley to vote against Tanden nomination Klain on Manchin’s objection to Neera Tanden: He ‘doesn’t answer to us at the White House’ MORE (R-Ariz.), a conservative who was willing to buck his party. Former Sen. John McCainJohn Sidney McCainKoch network urges lawmakers to back ‘personal option’ health plan Graham: Trump can make GOP bigger, stronger, or he ‘could destroy it’ Former Trump Defense chief Esper to join McCain Institute MORE (R-Ariz.) died in 2018. 

Asked about the trail of departures, Sen. Lisa MurkowskiLisa Ann MurkowskiGOP leaders reiterate commitment to working with Trump amid back-and-forth Schumer moves to break GOP holds on Haaland Republicans put procedural delay on Haaland’s nomination MORE (R-Alaska) interjected “all of the institutionalists?” 

“I think about just the years of legislating that they have brought to these discussions, it’s going to be a real loss. A loss for the institution really,” Murkowski said. 

“Over the years, Congress has changed and we’ve seen different leaders rise, perform and leave. … But it just seems like, it seems like, we’re losing so much of that substantive tenure in a very short period,” she added. 

It’s far from certain the current exits will be the only ones for Senate Republicans. Sen. Chuck GrassleyChuck GrassleyThe Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by the National Shooting Sports Foundation – CDC news on gatherings a step toward normality Blunt retirement shakes up Missouri Senate race Roy Blunt won’t run for Senate seat in 2022 MORE (Iowa), the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee and the panel’s former chairman, isn’t expected to make a decision about running for another term until the fall. Murkowski — who Trump has threatened to campaign against — also hasn’t said if she will run for reelection. 

Murkowski, asked if she had made a decision on 2022, said, “I have to do it before 2022.” 

The departures are being watched closely by Democrats. 

“These are people I’ve worked with for years. They harken back to an era where there was bipartisan cooperation so I’m worried about their absence,” said Sen. Dick DurbinDick DurbinBiden DOJ nominee apologizes for ‘harsh rhetoric’ amid GOP criticism Democrats near pressure point on nixing filibuster  Senate approves sweeping coronavirus measure in partisan vote MORE (D-Ill.). 

Asked if he had seen the same interest in bipartisanship from newer members, Durbin replied, “not yet.”

The changing of the guard comes as many GOP institutionalists are replaced with Republicans more in the mold of former President TrumpDonald TrumpManhattan prosecutors intensifying probe into Trump’s New York estate: report GOP leaders reiterate commitment to working with Trump amid back-and-forth Top Republicans seek to tamp down concerns over Trump’s funding demands MORE.

GovTrack, a congressional analysis website, ranked Sen. Marsha BlackburnMarsha BlackburnRepublicans blast Pentagon policy nominee over tweets, Iran nuclear deal White House defends Biden’s ‘Neanderthal thinking’ remark on masks Marsha Blackburn: Biden needs to ‘rethink’ comments about ‘resilient’ and ‘resourceful’ Neanderthals MORE (R-Tenn.) as the senator most ideologically to the right in 2019. Her predecessor, Corker, was ranked 47 in 2018. 

Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), who replaced former Sen. Doug Jones (D-Ala.), has a 100 percent Trump score according to FiveThirtyEight. Shelby, while still a typical Trump vote, was at 90 percent. Former Sen. Martha McSallyMartha Elizabeth McSallyGOP targets Manchin, Sinema, Kelly on Becerra House Freedom Caucus chair weighs Arizona Senate bid New rule shakes up Senate Armed Services subcommittees MORE (R-Ariz.) voted with Trump 94.9 percent of the time; McCain, whose seat she was appointed to, was at 83 percent. 

Republicans only need a net gain of one seat to win back the majority next year. But they are defending 20 seats in 2022, including two in states won by Biden: Pennsylvania, where Toomey is retiring, and Wisconsin, where Sen. Ron JohnsonRonald (Ron) Harold JohnsonThe Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by the National Shooting Sports Foundation – CDC news on gatherings a step toward normality Blunt retirement shakes up Missouri Senate race Report urges sweeping changes to Capitol security after Jan. 6 attack MORE (R) hasn’t made a decision but suggested recently his preference is to leave after 2022. 

Open seats could attract Trump loyalists, which could tilt the Senate GOP further toward Trump if they are elected.

Rep. Mo BrooksMorris (Mo) Jackson BrooksDemocratic lawmaker releases social media report on GOP members who voted to overturn election The Hill’s 12:30 Report – Presented by ExxonMobil – Senate begins marathon vote-a-rama before .9T COVID-19 relief passage Trump sued by Democrat over mob attack on Capitol MORE (R-Ala.), the House firebrand who supported efforts to overturn the election results, has indicated that he’s looking at running for Shelby’s seat. Rep. Jason SmithJason Thomas SmithThe Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by the National Shooting Sports Foundation – CDC news on gatherings a step toward normality Blunt retirement shakes up Missouri Senate race House panel advances Biden’s .9T COVID-19 aid bill MORE (R-Mo.) — who votes with Trump 94 percent of the time according to FiveThirtyEight — also said Tuesday that he’s considering a run for Blunt’s seat. 

“I would definitely compare my record for working class families and my conservative credentials against anyone that’s named. … So, I am considering it,” he said. 

It’s possible other senators will step into the shoes of the dealmakers. GOP senators who have been willing to cut deals include Murkowski, Sen. Susan CollinsSusan Margaret CollinsSchumer moves to break GOP holds on Haaland Republicans put procedural delay on Haaland’s nomination The Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by the National Shooting Sports Foundation – CDC news on gatherings a step toward normality MORE (Maine), Sen. Marco RubioMarco Antonio RubioBiden grants temporary legal status to thousands of Venezuelans in US GOP votes in unison against COVID-19 relief bill Hillicon Valley: YouTube to restore Trump’s account | House-passed election bill takes aim at foreign interference | Senators introduce legislation to create international tech partnerships MORE (Fla.) and others. 

“I think some of that is because of their experience, they have maybe a more extensive and nuanced understanding of not just the short-term but long-term consequences of doing things,” Cornyn said. “My experience is if we’ve got 50 others, people do step up.” 

Blunt, asked on Tuesday about senators leaving from the institutionalist wing of the party, questioned if that was “fair to the members that are staying,” predicting that senators who might be more ideological now would step up to fill any void. 

Speaking to reporters in Missouri on Monday, Blunt warned his potential successors of drawing hard lines on what they would never agree to. 

“I think the country in the last decade or so has sort of fallen off the edge with too many politicians saying, ‘If you vote for me I’ll never compromise on anything,’ ” Blunt said. “The failure to do that — that’s a philosophy that particularly does not work in a democracy.”



Read original article here

Senate GOP gets short-lived win on unemployment fight

Senate Republicans are getting what’s expected to be a short-lived win in a fight over unemployment benefits in Democrats’ nearly $1.9 trillion coronavirus bill.

Sen. Joe ManchinJoseph (Joe) ManchinOvernight Defense: Capitol Police may ask National Guard to stay | Biden’s Pentagon policy nominee faces criticism | Naval Academy midshipmen moved to hotels Progressives won’t oppose bill over limits on stimulus checks Senate votes to take up COVID-19 relief bill MORE (D-W.Va.) voted with all 49 Republican senators — Sen. Dan SullivanDaniel Scott SullivanThe Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by The AIDS Institute – Finger-pointing on Capitol riot; GOP balks at Biden relief plan Sanders votes against Biden USDA nominee Vilsack Senate confirms Vilsack as Agriculture secretary MORE (Alaska) is absent due to a family emergency — in support of a proposal from Sen. Rob PortmanRobert (Rob) Jones PortmanMandel gets Club for Growth nod in Ohio Senate primary Rick Scott caught in middle of opposing GOP factions Five takeaways from dramatic Capitol security hearing MORE (R-Ohio) to provide a $300 per week unemployment payment through mid-July.

But Democrats are expected to strip out Portman’s amendment and replace it with a deal they announced on Friday night, after a nearly 12-hour delay, before they pass the coronavirus deal likely on Saturday.

Democrats are still waiting for a Joint Committee on Taxation score about the cost of the Democratic proposal, which would provide a $300 per week payment through Sept. 6.

“We expect Senator Portman to offer his UI amendment and for it to pass. However, it will be superseded by Senate Democrats’ new UI agreement, which will be offered and passed as an amendment tonight,” a Democratic aide said about the path forward.

Though Manchin supported Portman’s amendment, he’s also expected to support the Democratic deal. In addition to the weekly payment, the Democratic amendment will let the first $10,200 in unemployment benefits be tax free for households with incomes of up to $150,000.

“We have reached a compromise that enables the economy to rebound quickly while also protecting those receiving unemployment benefits from being hit with [an] unexpected tax bill next year,” Manchin said in a statement endorsing the Democratic deal.

Democrats effectively put the debate on the coronavirus bill on hold for nearly 12 hours Friday as they tried to craft an agreement on the unemployment payments that could win over the entire caucus.

Democrats had initially said on Friday morning that they had a deal to provide a $300 per week payment until early October.

But as they day dragged on it became clear that they were still trying to wrangle together the caucus.

Majority Leader Charles SchumerChuck SchumerRon Johnson forces reading of 628-page Senate coronavirus relief bill on floor Senate panel splits along party lines on Becerra House Democrats’ ambitious agenda set to run into Senate blockade MORE (D-N.Y.) argued once the Senate moved forward just before 11 p.m. that Democrats were united.

“The agreement that’s been reached will allow us to move forward with the American Rescue Plan,” he said. “Senate Democrats are completely united in our belief about how important this entire bill is for our fellow Americans.”



Read original article here

Biden meeting with GOP senators Monday on coronavirus relief

A group of GOP senators will meet with President Biden on Monday after pitching their own coronavirus relief framework. 

“We appreciate the President’s quick response to our letter, and we are pleased to accept his invitation to the White House tomorrow afternoon to discuss the path forward for the sixth bipartisan Covid-19 relief package,” the GOP senators said in a joint statement.

The group includes GOP Sens. Susan CollinsSusan Margaret CollinsBiden reignites immigration fight in Congress Paul says Roberts’s absence ‘crystalized’ argument against Trump impeachment Democrats ready to bypass Republicans on COVID-19 relief bill MORE (Maine), Lisa MurkowskiLisa Ann MurkowskiPaul says Roberts’s absence ‘crystalized’ argument against Trump impeachment How McConnell derailed Trump’s impeachment trial before it started Kaine eyes next week to file censure aiming to bar Trump from future office MORE (Alaska), Bill CassidyBill CassidySunday shows preview: New COVID-19 variants spread in US; Redditors shake Wall Street with Gamestop stock OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Biden signs series of orders to tackle climate change | Republicans press Granholm on fossil fuels during confirmation hearing Republicans press Granholm on fossil fuels during confirmation hearing MORE (La.), Mitt RomneyWillard (Mitt) Mitt RomneyRomney blasts news of Trump call with Taylor Greene: ‘Lies of a feather flock together’ Marjorie Taylor Greene touts Trump call amid growing backlash Leaving the GOP After 46 years and feeling ‘politically homeless’ MORE (Utah), Rob PortmanRobert (Rob) Jones PortmanSunday shows preview: New COVID-19 variants spread in US; Redditors shake Wall Street with Gamestop stock The Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by Facebook – Which path will Democrats take on COVID-19 bill? Democrats ready to bypass Republicans on COVID-19 relief bill MORE (Ohio), Shelley Moore CapitoShelley Wellons Moore CapitoModerates vow to ‘be a force’ under Biden The Hill’s Morning Report – Biden’s crisis agenda hits headwinds Bipartisan Senate gang to talk with Biden aide on coronavirus relief MORE (W.Va.), Todd YoungTodd Christopher YoungSenate panel advances Buttigieg nomination in 21-3 vote Trump, allies raise pressure on Senate GOP ahead of impeachment Moderates vow to ‘be a force’ under Biden MORE (Ind), Jerry MoranGerald (Jerry) MoranSenate GOP boxes itself in on impeachment Moderates vow to ‘be a force’ under Biden The Hill’s Morning Report – Biden’s crisis agenda hits headwinds MORE (Kan.), Mike RoundsMike RoundsBipartisan group discussing Senate rules change Senate GOP signals it’s likely to acquit Trump for second time The Memo: Chances recede of GOP breaking with Trump MORE (S.D.) and Thom TillisThomas (Thom) Roland TillisSenate GOP signals it’s likely to acquit Trump for second time Senate committee advances Biden’s DHS pick despite Republican pushback Democrat Jeff Jackson jumps into North Carolina Senate race MORE (N.C.).

White House press secretary Jen PsakiJen PsakiMenendez calls for sanction on Russia after Navalny protests Biden signs executive orders at furious pace Biden, Yellen call for swift action on coronavirus relief package MORE disclosed on Sunday night that Biden had spoken to Collins, who he previously served with in the Senate and who has taken the lead in trying to jumpstart bipartisan negotiations on the next round of coronavirus relief, and invited her and the other nine GOP senators to the White House. 

The GOP senators outlined their own coronavirus framework earlier Sunday that Cassidy put around $600 billion — less than a third of the roughly $1.9 trillion plan offered by Biden. 

The GOP proposal would include $1,000 checks, while Democrats are pushing for $1,400 checks. It also includes more money for vaccines, extends unemployment benefits and includes things like nutrition assistance, small business aid and money for schools and childcare. 

The GOP letter comes as Democrats appear ready to move this week to set the stage for passing an eventual coronavirus relief bill through reconciliation, a budget process that will let them avoid a 60-vote legislative filibuster in the Senate. 

The House will vote on the budget resolution this week that will include instructions for crafting the coronavirus bill, with the Senate hoping to follow quickly. Democrats are hoping to be able to pass the coronavirus relief bill by mid-March, when unemployment benefits are set to expire. 

But Republicans have shown no signs of supporting a $1.9 trillion bill after Congress passed an additional $900 billion in coronavirus relief late last year—the fifth package that Congress has passed. 

Instead, the GOP senators, in their letter, urged Biden to work with them on a proposal, which they predicted could get through Congress if he supports it.  

“The proposal we have outlined is mindful of these past efforts, while also acknowledging the priorities that need additional support right now,” the GOP senators wrote.

“With your support, we believe Congress can once again craft a relief package that will provide meaningful, effective assistance to the American people and set us on a path to recovery,” they added. 

Democrats have slim margins in both chambers, and progressives, who view $1.9 trillion as the minimum Congress should be spending, would likely balk at a substantially lower price tag. 

In addition to speaking to Collins, Psaki said that Biden spoke with House Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiFBI: Woman arrested in Capitol riot allegedly said she wanted to shoot Pelosi ‘in the friggin’ brain’ Did Trump know what was about to happen Jan. 6? Marjorie Taylor Greene touts Trump call amid growing backlash MORE (D-Calif.) and Senate Democratic Leader Charles SchumerChuck SchumerProposal for permanent Capitol fencing sparks bipartisan pushback Immigration reform can’t wait Psaki expects DHS nominee Mayorkas to head task force to reunite separated families MORE (D-N.Y.) on Sunday. 

“He is grateful that Congress is prepared to begin action on the American Rescue Plan in just his second full week in office,” she said.

Psaki also gave no indication that Biden was considering abandoning his $1.9 trillion proposal for a smaller plan. 

“The American Rescue Plan …  is badly needed. As leading economists have said, the danger now is not in doing too much: it is in doing too little,” she added.

The White House invite also comes as Schumer, speaking to reporters in New York, reiterated his warning that Democrats were willing to move forward without Republicans if they wouldn’t support a “bold” plan. 

“We intend to move forward. We hope that we can move forward with a bipartisan way with our Republican colleagues cooperating. But we need big, bold action and if we can’t move forward with them, we’ll have to move forward on our own. Getting the job done in a big bold way is the number one priority,” he added.

Schumer also appeared cool to the GOP proposal, telling the New York Daily News that Republicans “should negotiate.” 

“If the reports are true, it doesn’t have any state and local money in it. Look at that, just as one thing,” Schumer said.



Read original article here