Tag Archives: Rittenhouse

Fox News to interview Kyle Rittenhouse amid protests over not guilty verdict | Fox News

Kyle Rittenhouse, the teenager acquitted of murdering two men during anti-racism protests, is set to appear next week on Fox News’s Tucker Carlson show amid fears that the not guilty verdict in the Kenosha killings might encourage militia violence.

Rittenhouse’s shooting of three people, including two he killed, during demonstrations in the Wisconsin city split the US. For some it made him a vigilante out to make trouble while for others he was a gun-toting hero defending property from a mob.

Rittenhouse became a heroic figure for conservatives during his trial as many rightwing figures raised money for his legal defense. His coming interview by Carlson – one of Fox’s most controversial and extreme hosts – is likely to cement that popularity. The Monday night sit down is already being heavily promoted by the conservative channel.

Carlson has risen to prominence as the most influential media figure for conservatives, even amid numerous controversies.

Carlson has advocated for multiple baseless conspiracy theories on his show and been condemned for dog-whistling racism. The Fox News host is releasing a series that argues that the 6 January Capitol insurrection was orchestrated by leftist Antifa group. He has also bemoaned the Democratic party for trying to “replace the current electorate” with “voters from the third world” through immigration policies: what is known as the “great replacement theory” that has originated in the far right.

The Fox News host appears to not only have interviewed Rittenhouse for the show, but has also filmed a short documentary on Rittenhouse during his trial. A clip of Rittenhouse in the backseat of a car, seemingly right after his not guilty verdict, was previewed on Carlson’s show Friday night.

“The jury reached the correct verdict. Self defense is not illegal,” Rittenhouse says in the clip.

Mark Richards, an attorney for Rittenhouse, told CNN’s Chris Cuomo that a Fox film crew was embedded with the defense team for the duration of the trial, which Richards did not approve of. “I threw them out of the room several times,” Richards said. “I don’t think a film crew is appropriate for something like this.”

Richards told Cuomo that the people who fundraised for Rittenhouse’s defense were “trying to raise money” and that Rittenhouse’s family and his advisers approved of the film crew being there during the trial.

In the aftermath of the Rittenhouse verdict and the success of his self-defense argument, some experts have raised concerns that Rittenhouse’s verdict will empower extremist movements and provoke violence in the name of vigilantism.

“It has never taken more than a whisper of approval to fan the flames of militant right action, and the Kenosha acquittal is a shout,” wrote Kathleen Belew, a historian who studies the white power movement, on Twitter.

Jeri Bonavia, executive director of the Wave Educational Fund, an organization in Wisconsin that aims to prevent gun violence, told NBC News that the trial is “feeding this idea that individual citizens need to be out there, not as part of a functioning society, but as these rogue dispensers of justice”.

Hours after Rittenhouse’s not guilty verdict was delivered, US attorney general Merrick Garland spoke at the swearing in of Manhattan’s new US attorney and emphasized the role the justice department plays in protecting civil rights, noting the department’s history in combating the Ku Klux Klan and protecting voting rights.

At the ceremony, Damian Williams, who is the first Black top federal law enforcement official overseeing the southern district of New York, one of the country’s most powerful federal courts, said that he’s establishing a civil rights unit in his office’s criminal division to concentrate greater resources on problems worsening in “troubled times”.

“White supremacist groups are on the march. Antisemitism is on the march. Anti-Asian violence is on the march. Abuse of the most vulnerable in our society is on the march, and that includes, by the way, abuse of incarcerated women and men who lose their liberty but not their right to be kept safe,” Williams said.

Patches of protests were seen in cities across the country on Friday in response to the Rittenhouse verdict.

The protests, including one outside of the courthouse in Kenosha, were largely peaceful. Protests in Portland, where far-right groups have clashed with leftwing activists, were declared a riot last night after demonstrators started to break windows and throw objects at police.



Read original article here

Here’s what legal experts say helped acquit Kyle Rittenhouse

Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, were killed, and Gaige Grosskreutz, now 27, was wounded. Rittenhouse was charged with five felonies: first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide, attempted first-degree intentional homicide and two counts of first-degree recklessly endangering safety.

These were the factors experts said helped lead to Rittenhouse’s acquittal.

Rittenhouse’s testimony was key

Among the trial’s most key moments was the testimony from Rittenhouse, who told the court he acted in self-defense when he shot Rosenbaum, who he said threatened him earlier, chased him, threw a bag at him and lunged for his gun. At one point, 18-year-old Rittenhouse broke down in tears while on the stand.

“If I would have let Mr. Rosenbaum take my firearm from me, he would have used it and killed me with it and probably killed more people,” he testified.

Rittenhouse referred to the other people he shot at as part of a “mob” chasing him, telling the court Huber came at him, struck him with a skateboard, and grabbed his gun. Rittenhouse shot him once in the chest, killing him. Finally, he said he saw Grosskreutz lunge at him and point a pistol at his head, so Rittenhouse shot him, he testified.

Defense attorney Mark Richards told reporters Friday in his mind, ‘it wasn’t a close call’ whether to put Rittenhouse on the stand.

“We had a mock jury and we did two different juries, one with him testifying and one without him testifying. It was substantially better when he testified… and that sealed it,” Richards said. “If you don’t put a client on the stand, you’re going to lose, period.”

His testimony was key for several reasons, according to legal experts.

“Number one, you humanize him… More important, number two, he explained his uses of force,” CNN legal analyst Joey Jackson said.

Rittenhouse’s testimony gave jurors the ability to hear what he thought at the time and whether he believed he was in danger — a claim the prosecution, ultimately failed to undermine, former federal prosecutor Elie Honig said.

“They (prosecutors) pointed out some sort of minor inconsistencies and things he said on the night of, and said later, but nothing that undermines sort of the core defense argument, which was, he was attacked,” Honig told CNN’s Alisyn Camerota on Friday. “Every time he shot, he was attacked.”

“The prosecution did not make enough of a dent in Kyle Rittenhouse,” Honig added.

State did not prove Rittenhouse provoked violence

What the trial came down to, according to civil rights attorney Charles F. Coleman Jr. were two competing narratives: one of Rittenhouse being a victim who was attacked, and one of being a vigilante who provoked the violence.

“The jury bought the narrative of Kyle Rittenhouse being a victim, they thought that his self-defense claim was a lot stronger than the prosecution’s provocation claim,” he said.

Wisconsin law allows the use of deadly force only if “necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm.” And because Rittenhouse’s attorneys claimed self-defense, state law meant the burden fell on prosecutors to disprove Rittenhouse was acting in self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt.

And it was an uphill battle to climb from the start, because of the facts in this case, experts said.

“(Prosecutors) weren’t able to show that his response to each of these men, to each of these sets of threats was unreasonable,” criminal defense attorney Sara Azari told CNN’s Pamela Brown.

“When the jury came back a couple days ago and watched the videos… frame by frame, they were looking to see whether Kyle did something to provoke the threat and whether his response to that threat was reasonable in terms of using deadly force and they agreed with the defense that it was,” Azari added.

In addition, testimony from the trial challenged many assumptions previously surrounding the case and even some testimony from the state’s witnesses supported Rittenhouse’s self-defense claim, said criminal defense attorney Bob Bianchi.
Former Marine Jason Lackowski, who testified for the state, said Rosenbaum acted “belligerently” and asked to be shot but was not perceived as a serious threat. Richie McGinniss, a video editor with The Daily Caller news site, testified Rosenbaum had lunged for the front of Rittenhouse’s rifle moments before he was shot. Grosskreutz, who was wounded, testified he pointed a pistol at Rittenhouse and later clarified to the prosecution during redirect questioning he never intentionally pointed his gun at Rittenhouse.

“The prosecution … has to disprove self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt to all 12 jurors. How do you do that when you saw no real provocation going on?” Bianchi said. “There wasn’t a real trial lawyer … that didn’t sit here and say this is an amazingly good self-defense case.”

Prosecutors also took missteps

There were mistakes the state made as well, including overselling the case by trying to paint Rittenhouse as an active shooter, Honig, the former federal prosecutor, said.

In his closing arguments earlier this week, Kenosha County Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger said Rittenhouse behaved in a way no reasonable person would, provoked the incident, fired his gun recklessly, lied numerous times and as a result, the crowd had a right “to try and stop an active shooter.”

“Trying to brand Kyle Rittenhouse as an active shooter did not stand up and the defense came back and showed, here he is walking through the streets, he’s not shooting indiscriminately, that’s what an active shooter does, he’s only shooting people who have attacked him first,” Honig said.

Rittenhouse’s defense attorney also pointed to the prosecution’s active shooter argument during his news conference, saying, “justice is done when the truth is reached.”

“A prosecutor is supposed to seek the truth,” Richards added.

In addition, trying to paint Rittenhouse as provocative because he brought an AR-15 firearm did not work because of the culture of guns in Wisconsin, which aren’t necessarily always equated with criminal activity, legal experts told CNN.

‘You’ve got to remember you’re in a jurisdiction where this is not an unusual thing,” Bianchi said.

Honig added the prosecution team made other mistakes, which led to heated exchanges with Judge Bruce Schroeder. The judge twice admonished Binger for his line of questioning — once for implicating Rittenhouse’s silence after his arrest (a right guaranteed under the Fifth Amendment) and later for touching on questions related to an incident the judge had ruled would not be permitted to come into evidence.

“That is an absolute amateur move by the prosecutors,” Honig said.

Jury instructions were consequential, expert says

Finally, the jury instructions also helped lead to Rittenhouse’s acquittal, CNN senior legal analyst Laura Coates said.

Coates said the instructions said jurors had to look at the case through the eyes of then 17-year-old Rittenhouse, not in hindsight, and assess the reasonableness of his actions.

“The jury instructions were really centered around that term ‘reasonable.’ Defining the word ‘reasonable.’ And the jury instructions required this jury to look through the lens and perspective of Kyle Rittenhouse. Not Monday morning quarterback, not the jurors, or the court of public opinion in hindsight,” Coates said. “What would he reasonably and what did he reasonably believe about the possibility of a lethal threat or harm and grave bodily harm?”

That, in combination with having to disprove Rittenhouse’s self-defense claim and show he provoked the violence during the chaotic night, meant the”deck was stacked against” prosecutors, Coates said.

“With all that combined, it’s not surprising that an acquittal happened, but it came down really to that jury instruction about looking through the eyes of Kyle Rittenhouse,” Coates said.

Read original article here

Chicago thieves target Neiman Marcus, GameStop amid Rittenhouse protests

Thieves reportedly targeted a Neiman Marcus store on Chicago’s Magnificent Mile and a GameStop on the South Side on Friday night as protesters took the streets to oppose Kyle Rittenhouse’s’ acquittal.

Chicago police wouldn’t confirm if the thefts were related to the protests, according to FOX 32 in Chicago. 

At the Neiman Marcus, a group of 15 men reportedly rushed into the department store and left in three vehicles with their stolen merchandise.  

Protesters across the country expressed their disapproval of the jury’s decision in Kenosha, Wisconsin, Friday. The 18-year-old Illinois resident shot and killed two protesters and wounded another last year during a protest in Kenosha that followed the police-involved shooting and wounding of Jacob Blake.

Kenosha is about 66 miles north of Chicago, along the western shore of Lake Michigan.

AS CHICAGO PROTESTS START, LIGHTFOOT CALLS FOR ‘RESPECT’ FOR RITTENHOUSE JURY’S DECISION

The protests in Chicago remained largely peaceful, according to FOX 32. 

“We have to protest tonight to show these right-wingers, to show the system that we won’t back down,” demonstrator Shavvir Manjee told the station. “Because the precedent that they’re setting is that these armed vigilantes can show up to our protests, show up to where we’re making demands, and threaten us and intimidate us. And we’re here to say we won’t be intimidated.”

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot urged protesters to be peaceful earlier Friday. 

“Under our constitutional system, we must respect the jury’s decision,” Lightfoot said in a statement after the verdict, according to FOX 32. But she asserted that Rittenhouse’s conduct in August 2020 was “reckless, dangerous, and showed an utter disregard for human life.” 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“No one should ever take the law into their own hands, or attempt to make themselves the judge, jury, and executioner,” the Democrat said, giving her condolences to the victims’ families. 

Read original article here

Brooklyn Bridge protesters kneel for those shot by Kyle Rittenhouse after acquittal

Hundreds of demonstrators marched across New York City’s Brooklyn Bridge to Manhattan on Friday night, blocking traffic as they protested Kyle Rittenhouse’s acquittal. 

The marchers started from Brooklyn’s Barclays Center sports arena around 7 p.m. ET before moving across the bridge.

At one point, the protesters took a knee and held a moment of silence on the bridge in deference to the two men killed by Rittenhouse last year in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Earlier Friday, a Wisconsin jury agreed with Rittenhouse that the killings were in self-defense.

KYLE RITTENHOUSE FOUND NOT GUILTY ON ALL COUNTS: LIVE UPDATES

But the New York crowd disagreed with the jury’s decision.

“The message, basically, is that when you stand up for Black liberation, when you stand up for Black lives, no matter who you are, you automatically become a target of the system,” protester Na-Lakan Masego told WCBS-TV in New York of Rittenhouse’s acquittal.

Demonstrators marched across the Brooklyn Bridge on Friday in protest of Kyle Rittenhouse’s acquittal. 
(Associated Press)

POLICE DEPARTMENTS ACROSS US BRACING FOR POSSIBLE VIOLENCE AFTER ACQUITTAL 

The 18-year-old defendant had faced several felony charges, including intentional homicide, and years in prison, if he was found guilty of fatally shooting two men and wounding a third during Black Lives Matter protests and riots last year in Kenosha, Wisconsin. The unrest followed the police-involved shooting and wounding of Jacob Blake.

Protests kneel on the Brooklyn Bridge in New York City on Friday night. 
(Associated Press)

Rittenhouse was found not guilty on all of the charges he faced. 

“This sets a scary precedent, you know, and I’m not, I’m not sure what to do as, like, a regular person so I just made this sign,” protester Phoebe Helander told the station.

A protest leader told demonstrators who gathered that they needed to stay engaged and come to future protests because Black lives were “still mattering and they’re still going to be shot down.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The protest remained peaceful and no arrests were reported. 

In Queens, at least five people were arrested for property damage. 

“The NYPD takes its responsibility to protect the 1st amendment rights of peaceful demonstrators seriously,” the department wrote on Twitter. “Just as important is the safety of NYers & the protection of property from people breaking the law in the name of protest. As seen tonight in Queens, they will be arrested.”

The NYPD tweeted photos of a smashed windshield and graffiti on the back of someone’s vehicle that said: “F— you.” 



Read original article here

Kyle Rittenhouse Breaks Silence After Not Guilty Verdict – NBC Chicago

Kyle Rittenhouse publicly spoke about his not guilty verdict Friday after a jury acquitted the now 18-year-old on all counts for fatally shooting two men and injuring a third at protests during unrest in Kenosha.

Fox News Host Tucker Carlson tweeted a video of Rittenhouse sitting inside a vehicle in the hours following the verdict, discussing the jury’s decision.

“I believe they came to the correct verdict, and I’m glad everything went well,” the teenager said. “It’s been a rough journey, but we made it through it. We made it through the hard part.”

Kyle Rittenhouse received a not guilty verdict Friday on all counts in his murder trial, but what’s next for the Illinois teen? NBC 5’s Phil Rogers reports.

Rittenhouse, who is the subject of a documentary by Carlson set to air in December, will appear on “Tucker Carlson Tonight” at 7 p.m. Monday.

The teenager from Antioch was on trial for killing two men and wounding a third with a rifle during a turbulent night of protests that erupted in Kenosha in the summer of 2020 after a Black man, Jacob Blake, was shot by a white police officer. Rittenhouse said he acted in self-defense, while the prosecution argued he instigated the bloodshed.

The case has become a flashpoint in the U.S. debate over guns, racial-justice protests, vigilantism and law and order.

The jury appeared to be overwhelmingly white. Prospective jurors were not asked to identify their race during the selection process, and the court did not provide a racial breakdown.

Members of Blake’s family said “this is a sad day for justice in America,” though many experts said the verdict wasn’t unexpected.

“I’m not really surprised from a legal basis,” said Attorney Thomas Glasgow, a former prosecutor. “When you take all the politics out of this, this was an extremely difficult case for the prosecution.”

Rittenhouse was 17 when he went to Kenosha from his home in Antioch in what he said was an effort to protect property from rioters in the days after Blake was shot.

In a fast-moving series of clashes in the streets, Rittenhouse shot and killed Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, and wounded Gaige Grosskreutz, now 28.

During closing arguments Monday, prosecutor Thomas Binger said that Rittenhouse was a “wannabe soldier” who set the deadly chain of events in motion by bringing a rifle to a protest and pointing it at protesters just before he was chased.

On the steps of the Kenosha County Courthouse, people shared a mix of reactions to Kyle Rittenhouse’s not guilty verdict in his murder trial. NBC 5’s Regina Waldroup reports.

But Rittenhouse lawyer Mark Richards countered that Rittenhouse was ambushed by a “crazy person” — Rosenbaum.

Rittenhouse testified that Rosenbaum chased him down and made a grab for his rifle, causing him to fear the weapon was going to be used against him. His account of Rosenbaum’s behavior was largely corroborated by video and some of the prosecution’s own witnesses.

Read original article here

Hannity advises Rittenhouse on response to media, Democrat smears: ‘Sue them all’

In his Opening Monologue, host Sean Hannity suggested acquitted Illinois teenager Kyle Rittenhouse sue several Democratic officials and media pundits for what he called slanderous behavior.

“Kyle Rittenhouse should sue them all, all of them,” said Hannity. “Starting with Joe Biden.” 

Then-candidate Joe Biden included an image of Rittenhouse in a 2020 campaign video calling out “White supremacists.”

Hannity also pointed to other officials including Boston’s Democratic congresswoman, Ayanna Pressley – as well as Texas gubernatorial candidate Robert F. “Beto” O’Rourke, New York Rep. Jerrold Nadler, St. Louis Democratic Rep. Cori Bush – along with outlets CBS News and NBC News & MSNBC.

In 2020, Pressley tweeted that Rittenhouse was a “17-year-old white supremacist domestic terrorist” and falsely claimed he “drove across state lines armed with an AR-15.”

Rittenhouse, an Illinois resident, procured the weapon used in the shooting incident while in Wisconsin. Pressley further asked that the media “fix [its] damn headlines.”

BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS – MARCH 24: U.S. Representative Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) speaks before the swearing in of Kim Janey as the Mayor of Boston at City Hall on March 24, 2021. (Photo by Maddie Meyer/Getty Images)
(Getty)

The host also pointed to Minnesota Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, a Democrat from the Twin Cities  – who characterized Rittenhouse as a “domestic terrorist that executed two people”

On “Hannity,” the host went on to point to other more recent examples of left-wing outrage, including from Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y.

In a fiery tweet earlier in the evening, the Upper West Side lawmaker called the verdict a “miscarriage of justice” and suggested the DOJ take a closer look at the “precedent” it set.

“Kyle Rittenhouse based on the law and the evidence and video evidence and testimony is innocent,” Hannity said. “He acted in self-defense. This is backed by eyewitness accounts and even the prosecution’s star witness backed this up in court. A jury confirmed what has been obvious for months – obvious to everyone acting in good faith.”

UNITED STATES – JUNE 17: Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., attends a bill enrollment ceremony for the Juneteenth National Independence Day Act in the Capitol on Thursday, June 17, 2021. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

The media and Democrats “rushed to judgment”, Hannity said, adding that they could have reached out to Rittenhouse or his attorneys to check facts before incorrectly reporting or allegedly defaming him.

“Now Kyle Rittenhouse should sue them all — starting with Joe Biden,” the host said, adding that in the media realm, NBC News might be the “worst offender” given how its hosts like Joy-Ann Reid have treated the teen.

Judge Bruce Schroeder, who was adjudicating the trial, banned MSNBC staff from the courtroom after a freelancer who was pulled over by local police for failing to observe a traffic control device reportedly said he was told by a superior to follow the jury bus.

Hannity added that outside of those who may be liable for defaming Rittenhouse, other Democrats and media figures have been generally reckless in their reactions and coverage.

He pointed to House Democratic Caucus Chairman Hakeem Jeffries, a New York City Democrat and outspoken critic of “mass incarceration,” who tweeted earlier this month that the court should incarcerate Rittenhouse and “throw away the key.”

House Democratic Caucus Chair Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., meets with reporters following a conference call with fellow Democrats, at the Capitol in Washington, Monday, Jan. 4, 2021. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

“My message to Kyle Rittenhouse: Sue them all,” Hannity said. “Hold them all accountable for their lies and make them pay and follow the law,” the host said.

“They are liars and con artists and Democratic operatives. Kyle Rittenhouse and Americans everywhere, we deserve better,” Hannity said.

“They are always wrong. They rush to judgment and never allow due process and never allow the presumption of innocence,” he said.

Read original article here

Kyle Rittenhouse verdict: Acquitted of intentional homicide and four other felonies in Kenosha shootings

Rittenhouse, wearing a dark jacket with a burgundy tie and shirt, stood behind the defense table as each not guilty verdict was read. He tried to hold back tears, then sobbed and appeared to collapse forward on the table, where his attorney embraced him.

“It’s been a rough journey, but we made it through it. We made it through the hard part.”

Carlson’s crew has been embedded with the teen throughout the trial and the Fox News host will interview Rittenhouse on his Monday show. The documentary will air in December on the Fox Nation streaming service, Fox News said.

Rittenhouse’s mother gasped after the final verdict was read, her head falling into her hands.

The panel of five men and seven women deliberated more than 25 hours over the past four days in a closely-watched case that polarized an already divided nation. The verdict cannot be appealed.

These are the five charges the jury considered
Gov. Tony Evers, in a statement, called for peace on the streets and said the trial has “reopened wounds that have not yet fully healed.”
During their deliberations, jurors requested to rewatch much of the video evidence of the shootings. In the end, they agreed with Rittenhouse’s testimony that he feared for his life and acted in self-defense.
Verdict sheets filed with the Kenosha County Clerk of the Circuit Court showed the presiding juror in the case signed the not guilty verdicts to the five charges on different dates.

Three verdict sheets were dated Wednesday and Thursday. The most severe charge Rittenhouse faced was a first-degree intentional homicide charge for the fatal shooting of Anthony Huber: count 4. Juror 54 signed the verdict sheet for that count Wednesday.

The two sheets signed Friday involved the fatal shooting of Joseph Rosenbaum and the charge of reckless endangerment of a man who was near Rittenhouse during the shooting.

Judge praises jury

Since the shootings on August 25, 2020, the case pitted Americans who saw Rittenhouse as an armed teen vigilante against those who viewed him as a citizen taking up arms to protect businesses from looters and rioters.

The judge praised the jurors, saying he “couldn’t have asked for a better jury.”

Some jurors appeared fatigued as the verdicts were read — their hands on their chins or rubbing their eyes, according to a pool reporter. Others seemed ill-at-ease, arms folded across their chests.

Things we’ve learned from the trial that challenge assumptions about the case

What’s next for Rittenhouse

Rittenhouse attorney Mark Richards said outside court that his client was on his way home and “wants to get on with his life.”

“He has a huge sense of relief,” Richards told reporters.

“He wishes none of this would have ever happened. But, as he said when he testified, he did not start this and we’re thankful in more ways than one that the jury finally got to hear the true story.”

Richards said the decision to put Rittenhouse on the stand “wasn’t a close call.”

“In Wisconsin, if you don’t put a client on the stand, you’re going to lose. Period,” Richards added.

The attorney said Rittenhouse has had 24-hour security and does not expect to continue to live in the area.

“I think eventually some anonymity will come,” Richards said.

David Hancock, a spokesman for the Rittenhouse family, told CNN affiliate WBBM the “goal is to ensure Kyle’s safety as he moves on as an 18-year-old young man in college studying to be a nurse.”
Here’s what we know about the three men Rittenhouse shot

Prosecutor ‘disappointed’ with verdict

After the verdict, lead prosecutor Thomas Binger told the court, “The jury has represented our community in this trial and has spoken.”

Binger, in a statement, said, “While we are disappointed with the verdict, it must be respected… We ask that members of our community continue to express their opinions and feelings about this verdict in a civil and peaceful manner.”

Huber’s family said in a statement “there is no accountability for the person who murdered our son.”

“It sends the unacceptable message that armed civilians can show up in any town, incite violence, and then use the danger they have created to justify shooting people in the street,” the statement said of the verdict.

“We hope that decent people will join us in forcefully rejecting that message and demanding more of our laws, our officials, and our justice system.”

Huber’s girlfriend, Hannah Gittings, was not surprised by the verdict.

“We know that this system is a failure,” she said.

Rosenbaum’s fiancée, Kariann Swart, said, “In this case, the victims’ lives don’t matter.”

Kimberley Motley and Milo Schwab, attorneys for Gaige Grosskreutz and Rosenbaum’s estate, said they will continue to seek justice.

“While today’s verdict may mean justice delayed, it will not mean justice denied,” they said in a statement. “We are committed to uncovering the truth of that night and holding those responsible to account.”

Prosecution faced uphill battle

The high-profile verdict generated mixed reactions, from the White House to the streets of Wisconsin.

President Joe Biden, in a statement, said the verdict “will leave many Americans feeling angry and concerned, myself included” but added people “must acknowledge that the jury has spoken.”

On a cold, sunny afternoon, mostly peaceful crowds gathered outside the courthouse. Protests were planned in several US cities Friday and Saturday, according to social media posts.

“We want the nation to know the nation that you live in now isn’t the … United States that we used to live in,” said Justin Blake, uncle of Jacob Blake, whose shooting by police last summer sparked the protests where Rittenhouse showed up with his gun.

The prosecution faced an uphill challenge from the start because Wisconsin law requires the state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt Rittenhouse did not act in self-defense. But there are limits to a self-defense claim.

“The defendant may intentionally use force which is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm only if the defendant reasonably believed that the force used was necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself,” the jury instructions explain.

One of the videos the jury asked to rewatch — a drone video showing Rittenhouse shooting Rosenbaum — was at the heart of a defense request for a mistrial in the case.
The deliberations came after a two-week trial highlighted by emotional and compelling testimony from Rittenhouse, the 18-year-old at the center of debates around self-defense, gun ownership and Black Lives Matter demonstrations. On the stand, he told jurors — and the viewing public — he acted in self-defense.

“I didn’t do anything wrong. I defended myself,” he testified.

Rittenhouse was charged with five felonies: first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide, attempted first-degree intentional homicide and two counts of first-degree recklessly endangering safety.

Jurors also considered lesser offenses for two of the five counts. If convicted on the most serious charge, Rittenhouse faced a mandatory sentence of life in prison.

Schroeder dismissed a misdemeanor weapons possession charge and a non-criminal curfew violation prior to deliberations.

The charges stem from the chaotic unrest last year in the wake of the Kenosha police shooting of Jacob Blake, a 29-year-old Black man. After instances of rioting and fiery destruction, Rittenhouse, 17 at the time, took a medical kit and an AR-15-style rifle and joined up with a group of other armed people in Kenosha on August 25.
There, Rittenhouse fatally shot Rosenbaum — who was chasing the teenager and threw a bag at him — and then tried to flee. A crowd of people pursued the teenager, and Rittenhouse shot at an unidentified man who kicked him; fatally shot Huber, who had hit him with a skateboard; and wounded Grosskreutz, who was armed with a pistol.

What happened in the trial

Prosecutors called 22 witnesses over the course of six days as they sought to show Rittenhouse acted recklessly that night and provoked Rosenbaum by pointing the rifle at him, setting off the ensuing series of events.

“That is what provokes this entire incident,” Binger said in closing arguments. “When the defendant provokes this incident, he loses the right to self-defense. You cannot claim self-defense against a danger you create.”

The prosecution portrayed the three other people who confronted the teen as “heroes” trying to stop what they believed to be an active shooting. Binger also questioned the teenager’s decision to take a gun into the city in the first place, calling him a “chaos tourist.”

On the stand, Rittenhouse testified he was defending himself when he shot four times at Rosenbaum, who he said had threatened him earlier, chased him, thrown a bag at him and lunged for his gun. Rittenhouse also referred to the three other people he shot at as part of a “mob” chasing him.
He became emotional and broke down into tears during his testimony as he began to recount the initial shooting, leading to a break in the case.

In closing arguments, defense attorney Richards said Rittenhouse feared for his life when he opened fire.

“Every person who was shot was attacking Kyle. One with a skateboard, one with his hands, and one with his feet, one with a gun,” Richards said. “Hands and feet can cause great bodily harm.”

The trial featured more than a dozen videos from the night that showed what happened before, during and after the shootings. Most of the facts of what happened that night were not up for debate — rather, at the heart of the trial was the analysis of Rittenhouse’s actions and whether they can be considered “reasonable.”

CNN’s Jason Kravarik, Mike Hayes, Carma Hassan, Cheri Mossburg and Chris Boyette contributed to this report.

Read original article here

Live Updates: Kyle Rittenhouse Found Not Guilty on All Counts

KENOSHA, Wis. — Kyle Rittenhouse, who fatally shot two men and wounded another amid protests and rioting over police conduct in Kenosha, Wis., was found not guilty of homicide and other charges on Friday, in a deeply divisive case that ignited a national debate over vigilantism, gun rights and the definition of self-defense.

After about 26 hours of deliberation, a jury appeared to accept Mr. Rittenhouse’s explanation that he had acted reasonably to defend himself in an unruly and turbulent scene in August 2020, days after a white police officer shot Jacob Blake, a Black resident, during a summer of unrest following the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer.

Mr. Rittenhouse, 18, sobbed and was held by his lawyers after the jury finished reading their verdict.

After the shootings, Mr. Rittenhouse was transformed from an unknown 17-year-old from rural Illinois into a symbol. Some Americans were horrified by the images of a teenager toting a powerful semiautomatic rifle on a city street during racial justice demonstrations, a reminder of the extent of open carry laws in the United States. Others saw a well-meaning young man who had gone to keep the peace and provide medical aid, a response to the sometimes violent protests that had roiled American cities in the summer of 2020.

Credit…Carlos Javier Ortiz for The New York Times

“So many people look at this case and they see what they want to see,” Thomas Binger, the prosecutor in the trial, had cautioned jurors before they began deliberations. The trial had grown so politicized that conservative groups raised money for Mr. Rittenhouse’s defense, and small factions of protesters — including gun rights’ supporters and racial justice demonstrators — had awaited the verdict on the courthouse steps.

As the verdict was read, Mr. Rittenhouse’s mother and sisters cried, and friends and family of the men Mr. Rittenhouse shot clutched each other. Outside, quiet gave way to shouts from supporters of Mr. Rittenhouse. Gov. Tony Evers had prepared for any unrest after the verdict by authorizing 500 Wisconsin Army National Guard troops.

On Aug. 25, 2020, Mr. Rittenhouse arrived in downtown Kenosha with his rifle and a medical kit on the third day of civil unrest over the shooting of Mr. Blake by Officer Rusten Sheskey in the former factory town of 100,000 residents. (In January, prosecutors announced they were not charging Officer Sheskey with wrongdoing.) Demonstrators marched peacefully at points, but some smashed streetlamps and set cars and shops on fire. Law enforcement was overwhelmed, and dozens of civilians took up their own firearms to guard businesses and subdivisions, adding to a tense and chaotic atmosphere that included sparring between the groups.

Testimony and video footage shown during the two-week trial revealed that Mr. Rittenhouse was chased into a parking lot, at one point, by Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, who was unarmed and behaving erratically. Mr. Rittenhouse turned and shot him at close range, killing Mr. Rosenbaum, who had been living in Kenosha.

Credit…Pool photo by Sean Krajacic

Mr. Rittenhouse then shot two other people — Anthony Huber and Gaige Grosskreutz — who pursued Mr. Rittenhouse as he fled, testimony showed. Mr. Grosskreutz, a medic from the Milwaukee suburbs, survived and testified at the trial, saying that he had pulled out a gun because he believed that Mr. Rittenhouse was an active shooter. Mr. Huber, who was 26 and had been protesting the shooting of Mr. Blake — a longtime friend — died after a gunshot to the chest.

Over the course of the trial, prosecutors sought to portray Mr. Rittenhouse, a former resident of Antioch, Ill., as an instigator who had behaved with criminal recklessness, inserting himself into a volatile scene of demonstrators and then firing his gun with little provocation.

There was chaos that night in Kenosha, Mr. Binger the prosecutor, told the jury in his opening statement. But “the only one who killed anyone,” he said, “was the defendant, Kyle Rittenhouse.”

At the heart of the case, though, was a fight over what acts qualify as self-defense. Wisconsin law allows deadly force to be used if a person “reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself,” and in the state there is no duty to retreat before using force.

The prosecution struggled to undermine Mr. Rittenhouse’s central defense: that he had feared for his life when he was chased by Mr. Rosenbaum, a man who had been captured on video throughout the evening shouting threats and racial epithets and — according to Mr. Rittenhouse and a witness called by the prosecution — had promised to kill Mr. Rittenhouse if he found him alone. Mr. Rosenbaum had been released that day from a hospital where he had received psychiatric care and was treated for bipolar disorder and depression, testimony showed.

Credit…Pool photo by Sean Krajacic

It was Mr. Rosenbaum, a defense lawyer, Mark Richards, said in his opening statement, who “lit the fuse” that night, “trying to take Kyle’s weapon from him to use against him.”

Still, in testimony, some people who had observed Mr. Rosenbaum, who was 5-foot-4, downplayed the danger that they perceived from him that night. Jason Lackowski, a former Marine and resident of Green Bay, Wis., who said he had traveled to Kenosha with a gun, knife and other weapons to “come down and help in any way we could, to protect local property” in the city, testified that he saw Mr. Rosenbaum as “a babbling idiot.”

Perhaps the closest witness to the encounter was Richie McGinniss, a videographer for The Daily Caller, a prosecution witness whose testimony was helpful in establishing a crucial detail for the defense: He said Mr. Rosenbaum had reached for the barrel of Mr. Rittenhouse’s rifle just before Mr. Rittenhouse fired.

“It was clear to me it was a situation where it was likely something dangerous was going to happen, be it Mr. Rosenbaum grabbing it or Mr. Rittenhouse shooting it,” Mr. McGinniss said on the stand.

Mr. McGinniss also became emotional in the courtroom as he described the trauma of the shootings and his fear when he realized he might have been struck by a bullet. After hearing the gunshots only feet away, Mr. McGinniss said, he stamped his legs on the ground to make sure that he had not been wounded.

Credit…Carlos Javier Ortiz for The New York Times

Mr. Rittenhouse had faced five felonies, including first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide and attempted first-degree intentional homicide. A sixth charge, for illegal possession of the rifle, was dismissed by Judge Bruce Schroeder after defense lawyers argued that Mr. Rittenhouse did not violate the state statute in question because of his age and the length of the barrel of his semiautomatic rifle. The gun was purchased by Dominick Black, a friend of Mr. Rittenhouse’s, because Mr. Rittenhouse was 17 years old and not legally old enough to buy it, testimony showed.

The trial, which took place in the courthouse in Kenosha that was shuttered and heavily barricaded during the unrest in August 2020, was marked by angry clashes over judicial procedure between the judge and lawyers, particularly the prosecutor, Mr. Binger.

Last week, the defense moved for a mistrial, suggesting that Mr. Binger — who had introduced questions on a topic that the judge had previously said was off-limits — was intentionally sabotaging the trial to avoid an acquittal.

Judge Schroeder, the longest-serving circuit court judge in Wisconsin, insisted that he wanted to keep politics out of his courtroom, scolding a prospective juror during jury selection who declared that his belief in the Second Amendment made him biased in favor of Mr. Rittenhouse. But the judge also drew attention on Veterans Day for the unusual step of prompting the jury to applaud a defense witness — a veteran — and for periodically launching into meandering asides for the jury on legal theory, Roman history and the Bible.

Jurors heard from dozens of witnesses, including women close to the men who had been shot dead; other armed people who had joined Mr. Rittenhouse on Kenosha streets that night; and witnesses who had livestreamed the shootings. In the most closely watched day of the trial, Mr. Rittenhouse testified in his own defense.

Credit…Carlos Javier Ortiz for The New York Times

His testimony began on an emotional note: He burst into tears as he recalled the night of the shootings, prompting the judge to call a recess. But for most of Mr. Rittenhouse’s time on the witness stand, he delivered a calm account, saying that he had brought a gun to downtown Kenosha for protection, did not plan to fire it and only did so when he feared for his life.

Mr. Grosskreutz, the only survivor of Mr. Rittenhouse’s gunshots, described the chaotic scene on the stand after he heard the first several shots ring out. Mr. Grosskreutz testified that he ran in the direction of the gunfire, determined to help people who had been injured. Within moments, he encountered Mr. Rittenhouse, fleeing down the street holding his rifle, and began to follow in his direction, holding a pistol Mr. Grosskreutz had brought.

When Mr. Huber gave chase and swung a skateboard at Mr. Rittenhouse’s head, Mr. Rittenhouse shot Mr. Huber in the chest. Mr. Grosskreutz continued to approach, he said in his testimony, first with his gun pointed in the air, then in the direction of Mr. Rittenhouse.

“I was never trying to kill the defendant,” he said. “In that moment, I was trying to preserve my own life.”

Read original article here

Live Updates: Kyle Rittenhouse Found Not Guilty on All Counts

KENOSHA, Wis. — Kyle Rittenhouse, who fatally shot two men and wounded another amid protests and rioting over police conduct in Kenosha, Wis., was found not guilty of homicide and other charges on Friday, in a deeply divisive case that ignited a national debate over vigilantism, gun rights and the definition of self-defense.

After about 26 hours of deliberation, a jury appeared to accept Mr. Rittenhouse’s explanation that he had acted reasonably to defend himself in an unruly and turbulent scene in August 2020, days after a white police officer shot Jacob Blake, a Black resident, during a summer of unrest following the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer.

Mr. Rittenhouse, 18, sobbed and was held by his lawyers after the jury finished reading their verdict.

After the shootings, Mr. Rittenhouse was transformed from an unknown 17-year-old from rural Illinois into a symbol. Some Americans were horrified by the images of a teenager toting a powerful semiautomatic rifle on a city street during racial justice demonstrations, a reminder of the extent of open carry laws in the United States. Others saw a well-meaning young man who had gone to keep the peace and provide medical aid, a response to the sometimes violent protests that had roiled American cities in the summer of 2020.

Credit…Carlos Javier Ortiz for The New York Times

“So many people look at this case and they see what they want to see,” Thomas Binger, the prosecutor in the trial, had cautioned jurors before they began deliberations. The trial had grown so politicized that conservative groups raised money for Mr. Rittenhouse’s defense, and small factions of protesters — including gun rights’ supporters and racial justice demonstrators — had awaited the verdict on the courthouse steps.

As the verdict was read, Mr. Rittenhouse’s mother and sisters cried, and friends and family of the men Mr. Rittenhouse shot clutched each other. Outside, quiet gave way to shouts from supporters of Mr. Rittenhouse. Gov. Tony Evers had prepared for any unrest after the verdict by authorizing 500 Wisconsin Army National Guard troops.

On Aug. 25, 2020, Mr. Rittenhouse arrived in downtown Kenosha with his rifle and a medical kit on the third day of civil unrest over the shooting of Mr. Blake by Officer Rusten Sheskey in the former factory town of 100,000 residents. (In January, prosecutors announced they were not charging Officer Sheskey with wrongdoing.) Demonstrators marched peacefully at points, but some smashed streetlamps and set cars and shops on fire. Law enforcement was overwhelmed, and dozens of civilians took up their own firearms to guard businesses and subdivisions, adding to a tense and chaotic atmosphere that included sparring between the groups.

Testimony and video footage shown during the two-week trial revealed that Mr. Rittenhouse was chased into a parking lot, at one point, by Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, who was unarmed and behaving erratically. Mr. Rittenhouse turned and shot him at close range, killing Mr. Rosenbaum, who had been living in Kenosha.

Credit…Pool photo by Sean Krajacic

Mr. Rittenhouse then shot two other people — Anthony Huber and Gaige Grosskreutz — who pursued Mr. Rittenhouse as he fled, testimony showed. Mr. Grosskreutz, a medic from the Milwaukee suburbs, survived and testified at the trial, saying that he had pulled out a gun because he believed that Mr. Rittenhouse was an active shooter. Mr. Huber, who was 26 and had been protesting the shooting of Mr. Blake — a longtime friend — died after a gunshot to the chest.

Over the course of the trial, prosecutors sought to portray Mr. Rittenhouse, a former resident of Antioch, Ill., as an instigator who had behaved with criminal recklessness, inserting himself into a volatile scene of demonstrators and then firing his gun with little provocation.

There was chaos that night in Kenosha, Mr. Binger the prosecutor, told the jury in his opening statement. But “the only one who killed anyone,” he said, “was the defendant, Kyle Rittenhouse.”

At the heart of the case, though, was a fight over what acts qualify as self-defense. Wisconsin law allows deadly force to be used if a person “reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself,” and in the state there is no duty to retreat before using force.

The prosecution struggled to undermine Mr. Rittenhouse’s central defense: that he had feared for his life when he was chased by Mr. Rosenbaum, a man who had been captured on video throughout the evening shouting threats and racial epithets and — according to Mr. Rittenhouse and a witness called by the prosecution — had promised to kill Mr. Rittenhouse if he found him alone. Mr. Rosenbaum had been released that day from a hospital where he had received psychiatric care and was treated for bipolar disorder and depression, testimony showed.

Credit…Pool photo by Sean Krajacic

It was Mr. Rosenbaum, a defense lawyer, Mark Richards, said in his opening statement, who “lit the fuse” that night, “trying to take Kyle’s weapon from him to use against him.”

Still, in testimony, some people who had observed Mr. Rosenbaum, who was 5-foot-4, downplayed the danger that they perceived from him that night. Jason Lackowski, a former Marine and resident of Green Bay, Wis., who said he had traveled to Kenosha with a gun, knife and other weapons to “come down and help in any way we could, to protect local property” in the city, testified that he saw Mr. Rosenbaum as “a babbling idiot.”

Perhaps the closest witness to the encounter was Richie McGinniss, a videographer for The Daily Caller, a prosecution witness whose testimony was helpful in establishing a crucial detail for the defense: He said Mr. Rosenbaum had reached for the barrel of Mr. Rittenhouse’s rifle just before Mr. Rittenhouse fired.

“It was clear to me it was a situation where it was likely something dangerous was going to happen, be it Mr. Rosenbaum grabbing it or Mr. Rittenhouse shooting it,” Mr. McGinniss said on the stand.

Mr. McGinniss also became emotional in the courtroom as he described the trauma of the shootings and his fear when he realized he might have been struck by a bullet. After hearing the gunshots only feet away, Mr. McGinniss said, he stamped his legs on the ground to make sure that he had not been wounded.

Credit…Carlos Javier Ortiz for The New York Times

Mr. Rittenhouse had faced five felonies, including first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide and attempted first-degree intentional homicide. A sixth charge, for illegal possession of the rifle, was dismissed by Judge Bruce Schroeder after defense lawyers argued that Mr. Rittenhouse did not violate the state statute in question because of his age and the length of the barrel of his semiautomatic rifle. The gun was purchased by Dominick Black, a friend of Mr. Rittenhouse’s, because Mr. Rittenhouse was 17 years old and not legally old enough to buy it, testimony showed.

The trial, which took place in the courthouse in Kenosha that was shuttered and heavily barricaded during the unrest in August 2020, was marked by angry clashes over judicial procedure between the judge and lawyers, particularly the prosecutor, Mr. Binger.

Last week, the defense moved for a mistrial, suggesting that Mr. Binger — who had introduced questions on a topic that the judge had previously said was off-limits — was intentionally sabotaging the trial to avoid an acquittal.

Judge Schroeder, the longest-serving circuit court judge in Wisconsin, insisted that he wanted to keep politics out of his courtroom, scolding a prospective juror during jury selection who declared that his belief in the Second Amendment made him biased in favor of Mr. Rittenhouse. But the judge also drew attention on Veterans Day for the unusual step of prompting the jury to applaud a defense witness — a veteran — and for periodically launching into meandering asides for the jury on legal theory, Roman history and the Bible.

Jurors heard from dozens of witnesses, including women close to the men who had been shot dead; other armed people who had joined Mr. Rittenhouse on Kenosha streets that night; and witnesses who had livestreamed the shootings. In the most closely watched day of the trial, Mr. Rittenhouse testified in his own defense.

Credit…Carlos Javier Ortiz for The New York Times

His testimony began on an emotional note: He burst into tears as he recalled the night of the shootings, prompting the judge to call a recess. But for most of Mr. Rittenhouse’s time on the witness stand, he delivered a calm account, saying that he had brought a gun to downtown Kenosha for protection, did not plan to fire it and only did so when he feared for his life.

Mr. Grosskreutz, the only survivor of Mr. Rittenhouse’s gunshots, described the chaotic scene on the stand after he heard the first several shots ring out. Mr. Grosskreutz testified that he ran in the direction of the gunfire, determined to help people who had been injured. Within moments, he encountered Mr. Rittenhouse, fleeing down the street holding his rifle, and began to follow in his direction, holding a pistol Mr. Grosskreutz had brought.

When Mr. Huber gave chase and swung a skateboard at Mr. Rittenhouse’s head, Mr. Rittenhouse shot Mr. Huber in the chest. Mr. Grosskreutz continued to approach, he said in his testimony, first with his gun pointed in the air, then in the direction of Mr. Rittenhouse.

“I was never trying to kill the defendant,” he said. “In that moment, I was trying to preserve my own life.”

Read original article here

Kyle Rittenhouse trial verdict – live: Kenosha shooter found not guilty as Republican says ‘be armed’

Kyle Rittenhouse found not guilty on all charges in homicide trial

Kyle Rittenhouse has been found not guilty on all counts in his homicide trial, after four days of tense jury deliberations. The 18-year-old became visibly emotional as the verdict was read, seeming to cry and hyperventilate before hugging one of his attorneys. It’s the latest stunning development in a story full of shocking moments.

Conservative politicians around the country celebrated the decision, with GOP congressman Madison Cawthorn offering Mr Rittenhouse an internship, and telling supporters to “be armed, be dangerous, and be moral” while exercising the right to self-defense.

Others, like writer and critic Roxane Gay, said the decision “emboldens white supremacist vigilantes.”

The White House on Friday said it was in touch with law officials in Kenosha, Wisconsin, about the controversial verdict, with press secretary Jen Psaki telling reporters, “We are supporting any effort towards peaceful protests.”

The drama began before a verdict was even reached. On Thursday, Judge Bruce Schroeder barred MSNBC from covering the trial inside the courthouse for the remainder of the trial, after a freelancer journalist was stopped by the Kenosha Police Department for allegedly running a traffic signal behind a bus used to transport jurors to the courthouse. Police said they believed the man tried to photograph the bus.

NBC News said in a statement that the journalist did not intend to contact or photograph the jurors and is cooperating with authorities. Police said “there was no breach of security regarding the jury, nor were there any photographs obtained”.

Mr Rittenhouse, 18, was facing five felony charges for shooting three men in the aftermath of police brutality protests in Kenosha, Wisconsin on 25 August 2020. The most serious charges were first-degree homicide for the deaths of Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber.

Follow the latest updates live:

To receive our free breaking news alerts direct to your inbox click here

1637349819

Kyle Rittenhouse trial reaction: Roxane Gay says verdict ‘emboldens white supremacist vigilantes’

The Kyle Rittenhouse verdict on Friday has inspired a range of different responses. Star Trek actor George Takei tweeted: “Justice denied is a body blow to our national psyche. On trial was not only a killer, but a system that continues to kill. Today that system defeated true justice, once again. But mark these words: We will never stop fighting for what is right and just.”

Community star Yvette Nicole Brown also posted: The good news is that white men and boys can still kill whoever they want and do NO jail time! Isn’t that fun! And he killed white people! I bet little Kyle Rittenhouse is gonna go right out and take some more white power pics with The Proud Boys and plan his next massacre.”

The Independent’s Sam Moore is following all the reactions to the controversial ruling.

Josh Marcus19 November 2021 19:23

1637349339

Madison Cawthorn tells his supporters “be armed, be dangerous” after Rittenhouse verdict

Conservative congressman Madison Cawthorn reacted with evident glee at the not guilty verdict in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial on Friday, offering the 18-year-old an internship and telling his supporters to “be armed, be dangerous, and be moral.”

Josh Marcus19 November 2021 19:15

1637348840

Kyle Rittenhouse collapses into seat and weeps after hearing not guilty verdicts

Kyle Rittenhouse collapsed into his chair and wept uncontrollably as the not guilty verdicts were read out in court on Friday.

Mr Rittenhouse, 18, became overcome with emotion at the conclusion of the three week trial as he was cleared of the homicide of Anthony Huber, 26 and Joseph Rosenbaum, 36. Mr Rittenhouse appeared to hyperventilate and embraced his lawyer Corey Chirafisi, before rushing out of the courtroom as Judge Brice Schroeder addressed the jury.

Bevan Hurley has the story.

Josh Marcus19 November 2021 19:07

1637347971

How the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse and tragedy in Kenosha captured toxic American politics

The Kyle Rittenhouse trial was the convergence of a number of toxic developments in American life. Despite assurances from Judge Bruce Schroeder that “this is not a political trial,” it’s hard to imagine a case that has inspired more political intrigue in recent years.

As The Independent’s Alex Woodward writes:Despite his insistence that the trial would not be political, politics and partisan influence dominated the case both inside and outside Judge Schroeder’s courtroom.

For more than a year, far-right media has fed their audience a false narrative that bolsters Mr Rittenhouse as a hero who stood up to their hyper-violent visions of “antifa” and Black Lives Matter protests in the wake of 2020 uprisings – and how “activist” prosecutors sought to make an example out of a “kid” who was unjustly arrested.

Josh Marcus19 November 2021 18:52

1637347322

Majorie Taylor Greene and Matt Gaetz lead celebrations of Kyle Rittenhouse not guilty verdict

The Independent’s Eric Garcia has the latest from DC.

Josh Marcus19 November 2021 18:42

1637346795

New York mayor Bill de Blasio slams Kyle Rittenhouse verdict as ‘miscarriage of justice’

Bill de Blasio slammed the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict on Friday. The New York mayor said the fact that the 18-year-old was found not guilty on all counts after shooting three people amid Black Lives Matter protests was “a miscarriage of justice.”

Josh Marcus19 November 2021 18:33

1637346639

‘We are supporting any effort towards peaceful protests’ — Psaki says White House has been in touch with law enforcement amid Rittenhouse verdict

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki on Friday said Biden administration officials have been in contact with Kenosha County officials amid the freshly announced verdict in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial in support of ensuring that any protests remain peaceful.

Asked whether the White House had a reaction to the verdict, the press secretary said she would check with the president and issue a statement “as soon as we can”. Andrew Feinberg is following the latest in Washington on this story.

Josh Marcus19 November 2021 18:30

1637346406

WATCH: Kyle Rittenhouse breaks down as verdict read in Kenosha

Kyle Rittenhouse became visibly emotional on Friday when it was announced he was found not guilty on all counts in his homicide trial, after shooting three men in the aftermath of police brutality protests in Kenosha, Wisconsin on 25 August 2020.

Josh Marcus19 November 2021 18:26

1637346010

ICYMI: How long deliberation took in other high-profile cases

The Rittenhouse jury has been deliberating for a total of about 24 hours over three days.

Here’s a look at the length of time juries took to return a verdict in other high profile cases:

Derek Chauvin – It took a Minnesota jury just over 10 hours to find Mr Chauvin guilty of second-degree murder, third-degree murder and manslaughter in the death of George Floyd in April 2021

Jason Van Dyke – Illinois jurors took about seven and a half hours to convict Mr Van Dyke of second-degree murder in the death of Laquan McDonald in October 2018

George Zimmerman – It took about 16 and a half hours for a Florida jury to acquit Mr Zimmerman of second-degree murder in the death of Trayvon Martin in July 2013

Casey Anthony – Florida jurors deliberated for less than 11 hours before acquitting Ms Anthony in the death of her two-year-old daughter Caylee in July 2011

Harvey Weinstein – A New York jury deliberated for about 26 hours before finding Mr Weinstein on two of five criminal charges in February 2020

OJ Simpson – A California jury deliberated for less than four hours before acquitting Mr Simpson of murder charges in the death of his estranged wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman in 1995

Ted Bundy – A jury in Utah deliberated for less than seven hours before finding him guilty on two counts of murder, three counts of attempted murder and two counts of burglary

Charles Manson – Jurors in California deliberated for nearly 43 hours before finding Mr Manson and his followers guilty on 27 counts – including murder and conspiracy – in 1971

Megan Sheets19 November 2021 18:20

1637345983

Kyle Rittenhouse verdict: Shooter is found not guilty on all charges in homicide trial

Kyle Rittenhouse has been found not guilty on all five charges in his homicide trial.

The jury in the homicide trial of Kyle Rittenhouse reached a verdict after four days of deliberations.

Jurors began their fourth day of deliberations on Friday morning, after spending more than 24 hours over the previous three days working on the case. Rachel Sharp has the details on this stunning development.

Josh Marcus19 November 2021 18:19



Read original article here