Tag Archives: RightWing

It’s Time to Put the Right-Wing Zombie Death Cult on Trial

What will the Biden Administration do to save our children from the disease-spreading, right-wing zombie death cult?

This week, we started to find out.

On Monday, the U.S. Department of Education opened civil-rights investigations into five states—Iowa, South Carolina, Utah, Oklahoma, and Tennessee—that are banning local school districts from imposing mask mandates. They are relying on two federal laws: the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which protects students with a disability from discrimination and guarantees them a right to a free education, and Title II of the Americans With Disabilities Act, which prohibits disability discrimination by public education systems. The states could be found in violation of federal law if the investigation finds that “students with disabilities who are at heightened risk for severe illness from COVID-19 are prevented from safely returning to in-person education.”

The penalties include loss of federal funding—or the school can simply agree to change its policies, which in this case would be choosing life by requiring masking and vaccination for school employees.

These students with heightened risk of illness include my 5-year-old daughter Nusayba, a Stage 4 cancer survivor who is immuno-suppressed due to her liver transplant. I recently wrote about how we were desperately trying to get her into virtual school, along with her brother, Ibrahim, who just turned 7. Thankfully, they were both admitted, and now I’m at home doing tech support until 3:30 p.m., but at least I know they are safe.

Meanwhile, there’s already been one COVID case on the second day of school. And their school is far from the worst of it. Thanks to the GOP’s multi-pronged and coordinated attack on masks, social distancing, and vaccines at schools, Delta is still thriving and there have been massive outbreaks at schools across the country.

A medical professional oversees as a fifth-grader gives himself a rapid COVID-19 test on the first day of school at Montara Avenue Elementary School in Los Angeles.

Allen J. Schaben / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

This isn’t a “both sides” problem. Of the 10 states with the most COVID-19 cases per capita, as of Wednesday, nine of them were led by Republican governors—surprise!—and voted for Trump in 2020, as The New York Times reported. Meanwhile, 16 Democratic states have statewide mask requirements for schools. Tennessee, one of the five states being sued, just set a new record for COVID hospitalizations, and previously moved to cut off all vaccine outreach to students and young adults.

Now, thousands of its school-aged kids have COVID-19 with no end in sight. Some school districts in the United States are even leaving it up to parents to decide if they will quarantine their exposed child or send the child to school to spread the disease to other unvaccinated children.

Meanwhile, conservative radio hosts and influencers who peddled anti-vax misinformation are winning Darwin Awards and dying weekly from the coronavirus.

However, this doesn’t stop the right-wing hate machine. Onward they persist with their nihilistic, counter-majoritarian death march.

Republicans, such as those in Texas, believe they have the freedom to infect their kid and your kids with coronavirus, but women shouldn’t have the freedom to control their own bodies. Other conservative activists believe “freedom” means harassing and threatening school boards, intimidating health care workers, and spreading the dangerous QAnon conspiracy theory, which is now a domestic terror threat. Among other things, some suggest that anyone who believes in vaccines and mask mandates in schools is actually a “demonic entity” and bears “the mark of the beast.” That’s what Melissa, an alleged nurse from Lee County, Florida, recently said at a school-board meeting where she said that Christians around America will “take them all out,” referring to anyone who opposed her pro-death initiatives to spread COVID-19.

People protest the North Allegheny School District’s mask mandate.

Alexandra Wimley/AP

You’d think she’s a kooky outlier, a walking punchline. But she’s an ordinary rank-and-file soldier in this death movement that is holding our children’s safety hostage to advance their culture war. They aren’t the “American Taliban” or “enforcing Sharia,” and we should stop using Islam and Muslims as the benchmark for extremism. They are agents of White Christian Supremacy hellbent on ensuring minority rule for white men by any violent means necessary.

Our kids are simply the bait and collateral damage.

Steve Lynch, a Republican running for Northampton County executive in Pennsylvania, is an anti-masker encouraging violence against school boards unwilling to submit to his anti-masking belligerence. On Aug. 29, he said, “You go in and you remove ’em. I’m going in there with 20 strong men… They can leave or be removed.”

In Buncombe County, North Carolina, anti-maskers tried to “overthrow” the school board, encouraged in part by Rep. Madison Cawthorn, who fought a tree and lost, and continued rehabilitating the imprisoned violent insurrectionists of Jan. 6 at a recent rally by referring to them as “political hostages.” He said he’s working on “busting them out,” and he also seemed to call for another riot, despite this past one effectively killing five people, including a police officer, and being followed by law-enforcement suicides. He urged the Macon County Republicans to “defend their children” from harmful vaccines.

One of my lovely fans emailed me this week to warn me that violence will “spill out into the streets” and “there [are] 100 million Americans waiting for the day. I don’t foresee any Army coming to the rescue of the voices such as yourself who spin a web of lies and hateful rhetoric.”

He used his full name and email address. There’s no need to hide in the shadows and wear the hoods when your elected officials and your God-King, Trump, openly incite potential violence and criminality.

A teacher holds up a sign protesting Florida’s decision to open schools last summer.

Joe Burbank/Orlando Sentinel/Tribune News Service via Getty

They are deliberately using threats of violence to terrorize the majority and have us cede ground. It seems to be working, as school-board members are stepping down across the country, unwilling to tolerate the “toxic and impossible” environment.

We’re dealing with a potential criminal element, and might need to flex with more than the Education Department and broad vaccine mandates to save our kids. I asked former career federal prosecutor Glenn Kirschner if the Department of Justice could step in with a criminal investigation if there’s evidence that these GOP-led state governments are actually harming children.

“I happen to believe that, because education is primarily a local issue, that local and state prosecutorial authorities should be evaluating whether the state governors and governments are recklessly and criminally endangering our children,” Kirschner told me, holding Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis as “a prime example.”

He believes DeSantis’ mask bans in Florida school districts might give prosecutors enough evidence to initiate a criminal investigation. He cited the recent Florida judge who overturned the recent mask ban and sided with parents whose lawsuit alleges, in part, that the policy violates the state constitution that requires providing a “uniform, efficient, safe, secure and high quality system” of public schools.

“I cannot understand why our prosecutorial authorities—federal, state, and local—seem to have concluded that we shouldn’t try to hold elected politicians accountable for killing the citizenry,” Kirschner added.

It is still possible that the Department of Education is introducing the carrot before the Department of Justice unleashes the stick. From my eyes, these GOP leaders are helping to actively kill people and harm children with their pro-death policies. That should immediately warrant criminal investigations and liability for causing avoidable COVID deaths.

The rest of us, the majority, need to stand our ground against this belligerent minority for the sake of our children’s safety and public health.

We can’t “both sides” or seek a bipartisan solution with a pro-death movement. Enough.

Read original article here

The rightwing US textbooks that teach slavery as ‘black immigration’ | Race in education

One history textbook exclusively refers to immigrants as “aliens”. Another blames the Black Lives Matter movement for strife between communities and police officers. A third discusses the prevalence of “black supremacist” organizations during the civil rights movement, calling Malcolm X the most prominent “black supremacist” of the era.

Legislatures and boards of education around the US are currently engaging in acrimonious battles about how issues of race and equity are taught in public K-12 classrooms – the latest culture war in a decades-long fight around whose stories and contributions get highlighted in school. But largely left out of this conversation has been the education provided in private schools, thousands of which have quietly been excluding diverse voices and teaching biased versions of history for years.

While public school textbooks suffer from their own blindspots, a Guardian analysis has found that private schools, especially Christian schools, use textbooks that tell a version of history that is racially biased and often inaccurate. These textbooks, used in thousands of private schools, many of which receive tens of thousands of dollars in public funding every year, whitewash the legacy of slavery, frame Native Americans as lesser and blame the Black Lives Matter movement for sowing racial discord.

This Guardian analysis comes as backlash around anti-racist education in public schools has reached a fever pitch. About half of states have enacted or are looking to enact restrictions on discussions of systemic racism. In Florida, for example, the state board of education recently voted to ban the teaching of critical race theory and The 1619 Project, a curriculum born out of a New York Times Magazine initiative that seeks to reframe American history through the historical legacy of slavery. In Iowa, the governor has signed a bill broadly banning the discussion of “divisive concepts” in public school, including racism and sexism.

The term “critical race theory”, an academic discipline that examines the ways in which racism operates in US laws and society, has also become a catchall bogeyman term for wokeness run amok, even though experts say they believe the theory is actually used in relatively few classrooms around the country. Conservative critics say that in practice, the theory is designed to make white students feel guilty for the sins of others, a drastic distortion of the academic concept.

Often hidden from public view, though, is how private schools teach these issues. Private schools, unlike public ones, receive little oversight or restrictions when it comes to curriculum. In truth, thousands of private schools are currently teaching history through a racially biased lens.

These textbooks “actually support what critical race theory is trying to argue – that is racism is part of the fabric of American life,” said Dorinda Carter, chairperson for the department of teacher education at Michigan State University and professor of race, culture and equity. “Those textbooks actually further spread racist ideas, that one group is superior over another, one group is more human than another.”

The Guardian reviewed dozens textbooks produced by the Christian textbook publishers Abeka, Bob Jones University Press and Accelerated Christian Education, three of the most popular textbook sources used in private schools throughout the US. These textbooks describe s slavery as “black immigration”, and say Nelson Mandela helped move South Africa to a system of “radical affirmative action”.

It’s unclear how many students are exposed to this type of curriculum in school, though the Abeka website boasts that its books have reached more than 1 million Christian school students in 2017. The Accelerated Christian Education website claims its materials are used in “tens of thousands of schools and innumerable homeschools established in over 140 countries”.

One Accelerated Christian Education high school textbook refers to the civil war as the “war between the states” (a term ordinarily used by those who romanticise the Confederacy) and says that the “end of slavery in this country was a legitimate goal, but much was done in the name of abolition that was as evil as the institution of slavery itself”. It contains a section titled “Black immigration”, referring to slavery, which notes: “Not all immigrants have come to America willingly.”

Another textbook, after debating the cause of the “War Between the States,” authors describe the positive legacy of the civil war.

In the ravages of lives and families being torn apart, believers found – in the north and south alike – new strength in God. The south suffered greatly both from the war and the period of reconstruction that followed but ‘de land ob cotton’ rose from the ashes to become the bible belt, a part of the country that has continued to stand firm on the fundamentals of Christian faith.”

A 2017 investigation previously conducted by HuffPost found that at least one-third of all private voucher schools throughout the country use curricula from one of these three sources – Abeka, Bob Jones University Press or Accelerated Christian Education – amounting to about 2,400 schools. The investigation did not account for the many private schools around the country that use these textbooks without voucher programs.

Instead of focusing on the horrors of slavery, the Accelerated Christian Education book sympathizes with the southern landowners who had to learn a new way of life after the war:

Under radical reconstruction, the south suffered. Great southern leaders and much of the old aristocracy were unable to vote or hold office. The result was that state legislatures were filled with illiterate or incompetent men. Northerners who were eager to make money or gain power during the crisis rushed to the south … For all these reasons, reconstruction led to graft and corruption and reckless spending. In retaliation, many southerners formed secret organizations to protect themselves and their society from anarchy. Among these groups was the Ku Klux Klan, a clandestine group of white men who went forth at night dressed in white sheets and pointed white hoods.”

Ed Countryman, distinguished history professor at Southern Methodist University, says the textbook appears to identify more with the citizens who were fighting to preserve slavery than the victims of an inhumane system.

“The south had waged a huge struggle to preserve an essentially evil system and the rest of the world knew it,” said Countryman. “When it’s over, yeah, the south was devastated – so was Nazi Germany after 1945.”

A representative from Accelerated Christian Education did not respond to a request for comment.

The other two textbook publishers, Abeka and Bob Jones University, take more pains to describe the horrors of slavery, but their history books still avoid reckoning with the impact of race and racism.

A Bob Jones world history textbook paints the religion of Islam as violent, with one section titled “Islam and murder”. An Abeka 11th-grade history textbook passage describes slavery in purely economic terms, ignoring its human costs, writing that “slaves seemed to be better investments than indentured servants”. As the Abeka textbook moves to modern history, the authors criticize President Barack Obama for harming race relations in the country.

Unfortunately, Americans’ views of race relations declined after Obama came into office. Race riots in places such as Ferguson, Missouri, and Baltimore, Maryland, greatly escalated racial tensions and worsened strife between minorities and local police,” the textbook reads. “President Obama’s attempts to resolve these problems often seemed to make the situation worse.”

Yet another Abeka high school history book echoes that analysis, blaming the Black Lives Matter movement for strife with law enforcement.

Groups such as black lives matter (BLM) sharpened the divide between police and citizen, and black and white, with divisive rhetoric,” says the textbook.

These textbooks also treat same-sex relationships as a matter of biblical immorality. Under a section called “Cultural Decay”, an Abeka history textbook says that “increased acceptance of homosexuality” has been a result of declining “American family values”, noting that such acceptance increased during the Obama administration.

Public schools also take different approaches to teaching these issues, based on location and state curriculum standards. A New York Times analysis of public school textbooks found that there are subtle differences in how textbooks used in places like Texas teach issues of race and gender compared with California. Public school textbooks overall take a far more multicultural, fact-based and objective approach to teaching history than the Christian textbooks.

A representative for Bob Jones University Press did not respond to a request for comment, and a representative from Abeka declined to comment.

These textbooks teach history from an evangelical perspective and have been around for decades, working to stoke fears about secular society, and more specifically, what goes on in public schools, says Adam Laats, a professor at Binghamton University who studies the history of American education has researched these publishers.

Those who are fighting for bans of critical race theory in schools are in some ways building on that legacy.

“The heart and soul of the anti-CRT outburst is this anxiety of the changing protagonists in the story of American history,” said Laats. “I think that’s what captures part of what these textbook manufacturers have been doing forever with American history.”

Read original article here

Rightwing radio host and anti-vaxxer dies of Covid | US news

A rightwing TV and radio host who was a vociferous critic of Dr Anthony Fauci and who urged his listeners not to get vaccinated against Covid-19 has died after contracting the virus.

Dick Farrel, who had described Fauci as a “power-tripping lying freak” who conspired with “power trip libb loons”, had urged people not to get vaccinated as recently as June.

He reportedly changed his opinion about vaccines after falling ill and later being admitted to hospital before passing away on 4 August aged 65. “He texted me and told me to ‘Get it!’ He told me this virus is no joke and he said, “I wish I had gotten [the vaccine]!” close friend Amy Leigh Hair wrote on Facebook.

Farrel, a native of Queens, New York, anchored radio shows in Florida and also acted as a stand-in anchor for the rightwing news outlet Newsmax, was described as a pioneer “shock talk” host.

His partner, Kit Farley, said: “He was known as the other Rush Limbaugh. With a heavy heart, I can only say this was so unexpected. He will be missed.”

Described as an ardent supporter of Donald Trump, Farrel went all-in on unsubstantiated 2020 election fraud conspiracy theories about election fraud and questioned the efficacy of coronavirus vaccines.

Hair told WPTV: “I was one of one the people like him who didn’t trust the vaccine. I trusted my immune system. I just became more afraid of getting Covid-19 than I was of any possible side effects of the vaccine. I’m glad I got vaccinated.”

Read original article here

‘It’s chilling what is happening’: a rightwing backlash to Biden takes root in Republican states | US politics

In his inaugural address in January, Joe Biden promised to use his presidency to “restore the soul of America”. He would unite the nation, defuse “anger, resentment and hatred”, and lead Americans back to a world where they treated “each other with dignity and respect”.

Six months later, Biden is still preaching the unity gospel, and regularly assures his fellow Americans that “there’s not a single thing we aren’t able to do when we do it together”.

Drive 1,400 miles west from the White House, to Dallas in Texas where Brianna Brown lives, and there’s little evidence of politicians working together that she can see. As an African American fourth-generation Texan, Brown has been assailed since Biden came into office by a whirlwind of regressive laws emanating from the Republican-controlled state legislature.

The explosion of extreme rightwing legislation rammed through by Texas Republicans this session – culminating on Monday with the dramatic flight of Democratic lawmakers from the state in an attempt to prevent the passage of the latest voter suppression law – has left Brown feeling apprehensive and insecure.

She thinks about her own family’s long struggle for voting rights now threatened once again, is fearful about being accosted in the street by armed men legally bearing arms without a permit, bothered about what might happen to her when she next joins a peaceful protest, and worried about the fallout of a renewed push to build a wall along the Mexican border.

Top of her list of concerns is the Republican bill to make it even more difficult to vote – in a state that already makes it harder to vote than any other in the nation. Brown recalls how she once heard her grandmother having to remind herself that her vote was no longer conditional on the poll tax – a ruse once commonly used in the south to disenfranchise Black people.

“That was my grandmother!” Brown said. “To say that people fought and died for our right to vote – that’s personal for me.”

Brown is spooked about another new law set to come into effect in September that effectively tries to turn ordinary citizens into anti-abortion bounty hunters. It offers a $10,000 reward to anyone who successfully sues a fellow Texan for helping a woman seek an abortion beyond six weeks of pregnancy.

“It is chilling that this is happening,” she said.

Bobby Caldwell, 87, of Houston, listens during a prayer rally against Republican bills that would make it harder to vote at the capitol in Austin, Texas, last week. Photograph: AP

As co-executive director of the Texas Organizing Project that seeks to empower Black and Latino neighborhoods, she is concerned too for the transgender men, women and children who are bearing the brunt of Republican intolerance in a state in which more anti-LGBTQ+ bills have been promoted by Republicans this session than in any other. “This is an assault on people who are on the margins,” she said.

And there’s more. Much more. There’s the order by the Republican governor, Greg Abbott, to all state agencies to block Biden’s efforts to combat climate change; the new law that punishes any Texas city that has the audacity to cut police budgets; the $1,000 fines that will be imposed on anyone requiring Covid masks to be worn in public schools; the gun law that allows Texans to carry handguns with no training and without a permit.

Brianna Brown is not feeling Biden’s vision of Americans doing things together. She is feeling the wrath of a Texan Republican party that since Donald Trump’s defeat in the presidential election last November has taken its animus to a whole other level.

“When I leave the house with my two-year-old daughter, I now carry with me two phones: a work phone, and a personal phone,” she told the Guardian. “I make sure I always carry both because I never know when I might need to call for help. The Republicans have incited their base. There are a lot of white people out there who feel very emboldened. Walking around as a Black person, the feeling is that this can easily escalate.”

Nor is Brianna Brown alone.

Across a vast swath of the American heartlands, the anti-Biden backlash is being replicated in Republican-controlled statehouses in what Ronald Brownstein has described in the Atlantic as a “collective cry of defiance”.

In some instances, the challenge to Biden is explicit. At least nine Republican-controlled states, Texas included, have passed laws banning the enforcement of federal firearms statutes in a blatant attempt to frustrate the president’s ambition to tackle the nationwide scourge of gun violence.

Twenty-six states have put a stop to the extra $300 a week in unemployment support that the federal government has extended through the pandemic, suggesting that they care more about resisting Biden’s economic agenda than about giving a helping hand to their own. The latest to do so, Louisiana, has the worst poverty rate in the US bar Mississippi – with one in five of its citizens below the poverty line.

In other cases, Republican-dominated legislatures have invested in hot-button social issues, aggressively targeting minority communities and other groups for attack. At least 15 states have between them enacted 90 measures to restrict access to abortions – a record number. Thirty-three states have pumped out 250 anti-LGBTQ+ bills, and five have allowed firearms to be carried without a license in a major loosening of gun laws.

The backlash so far this year has also involved virulent rightwing efforts to suppress the vote of Democratic-leaning demographics, especially people of color. In the first six months of the year, about 17 states have enacted 28 new laws that will restrict access to the ballot box, according to the Brennan Center, and more are certain to follow.

The welter of voter suppression measures is not only striking in its own right, it is indicative of one of the great driving forces of this year’s seismic eruption of toxic rightwing legislation. American politics is no stranger to Republicans responding fiercely to Democrats gaining control of Congress and the presidency – Newt Gingrich turned partisan obstructionism into an art form when Bill Clinton was in the White House, while Barack Obama’s victory as the first Black president gave rise to the Tea Party.

Kenny Wolfam open carries a pistol and wears a ‘Trump 2020’ T-shirt while counter-protesting a ‘Moms Demand Action’ protest in response to a new Texas gun law at Buffalo Bayou Park in Houston, Texas, last month. Photograph: Mark Felix/AFP/Getty Images

But the accent in 2021 on tampering with and tamping down the vote is a sharp departure from past form, both in its ferocity and in its extremism. The new trend is evident not just in attempts by states like Texas to erect additional hurdles to voting that especially affect African American and Latino communities.

Most sinisterly, bills have been introduced that would grant state lawmakers the power to overturn the legitimate will of the people in a contested presidential election. They would empower themselves to supplant their own winner – the electoral equivalent of a coup.

For Jacob Hacker, a political scientist at Yale, the attack on elections and the very machinery of democracy sets the current Republican fury apart. “This is different. Republicans at state level have moved from pursuing conservative economic policies to pushing measures designed to cripple the opposition and undermine democracy.”

Hacker added: “The Republican party used to be anti-Democratic, now it’s anti-democratic.”

The rocket fuel propelling the emergence of a fundamentally anti-democratic strain in Republican politics is Trump and his big lie that the election was stolen from him. The defeated president continues to peddle the falsehood, inciting his supporters with the potent belief that the current occupant of the White House is an impostor.

“Trump has broken a fundamental norm that politicians don’t refuse to accept the legitimacy of a free and fair election, and that has been hugely empowering,” Hacker said. “He has turned it into a loyalty test – are you with or against us? Either you believe, or pretend to believe, that Trump won the election, or you will be destroyed.”

In his new book with Paul Pierson, Let Them Eat Tweets, Hacker describes what he calls the “doom-loop” of rising outrage that now has the Republican party in its grip. Politicians stoke anger by assaulting a plethora of targets – Black people, immigrants, transgender youth, women seeking abortions, BLM protesters, critical race theory – to fire up the base.

Voters in turn get riled up, baying for the blood of anyone who crosses Trump or steps out of line. Party leaders duly respond by stoking up more outrage – and so the “doom-loop” turns and intensifies.

This tendency is quite consciously embraced by the party leadership. The New York Times unearthed a memo from Jim Banks, a Congress member from Indiana and chairman of the Republican Study Committee, in which he regurgitated frenzied exaggerations about critical race theory and concluded: “We are in a culture war. My encouragement to you is lean into it. Lean into the culture war.”

Such clear signs of a coordinated national resistance should not obscure the fact that today’s torrent of Republican anger has been a long while in the baking. Vote View, an academic research project, has tracked party ideology over time and found that while the Democratic party has moved gradually to a more overtly liberal stance, the shift by Republicans has been much more dramatic.

Since the 1970s the party has moved sharply to the right, increasingly aligning itself with white voters resentful of the civil rights movement, evangelical Christians and the cultural issues now so beloved of the leadership. Long before Trump burst on the scene, Vote View was recording that the Republican party was projecting its most conservative ideology in a century.

A Trump-Pence re-election sign and flags are displayed in rural central Pennsylvania. People of similar political allegiance tend to cluster together even at the neighborhood level. Photograph: Paul Weaver/Pacific Press/Rex/Shutterstock

You can’t understand such a rush to the right without considering demographic changes that have radically altered the face of American society over the same modern period. Ryan Enos, a social scientist at Harvard, has carried out groundbreaking research that shows that voters are now more segregated according to their partisan loyalties than they are by racial group.

“We think of America as a very racially segregated society. But we were surprised to find that Democrats are even more likely to live around Democrats, and Republicans with Republicans – and that drills down even to the level of neighborhoods.”

The physical segregation of voters has been matched by hardening political identities. Lilliana Mason, a political scientist at Johns Hopkins, has studied the self-identity of the American voter, discovering that over the past four decades it has become ever more tied to party allegiance.

“Partisanship has become a social identity, meaning that our sense of ourselves, who we are in the world, and even our sense of status is linked to our party. That’s who I am, and my emotional state is connected to whether my party is winning or losing,” she told the Guardian.

Mason’s research has found that between 1972 and 2016, not only have the two main parties moved sharply apart in conservative and liberal directions, but their supporters have also separated out in terms of race.

“Whites are moving very far towards the Republican party, and Blacks are moving very far towards the Democratic party. That divide increased by about three times over those years,” she said.

Throw partisan ideology and racial resentment into a pot, and the result is a fevered political climate in which elections are increasingly seen as existentially important. “We are clearly having a battle over social hierarchy and white patriarchy,” Mason said.

The US Capitol, 6 January 2021. An increasing number of Republicans endorse violence as a means of advancing political goals, polling has found. Photograph: Roberto Schmidt/AFP/Getty Images

In her upcoming book with Nathan Kalmoe, Radical American Partisanship, Mason reaches some alarming conclusions based on a series of surveys conducted over several years. Since 2017, the proportion of voters who think that physical violence against the opposite party could be at least a “little bit” justified has increased markedly.

The trend is especially stark for Republicans. When asked whether violence was justified were the Democrats to win the presidential races in 2020 or 2024, the proportion of those who assented leapt from 20% shortly before last November’s election to almost 30% in February.

Throw the big lie into the pot, and the bubbling stew of anger and hatred begins to boil over. Just after Biden became president-elect, Mason held another survey of voters and was chastened by what she learned.

Republicans who subscribed to the calumny that the election was stolen were far more likely to endorse violence to advance their political goals. If that’s the view of a significant chunk of the American people, Biden has a job on his hands.

Read original article here

Impeachment witness Vindman says he “should have sued Trump proxies” and right-wing media

Retired Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, who testified in the first impeachment trial of former President Trump, said Monday he “should have sued those who amplified his campaign of defamation.”

Driving the news: In an op-ed for Lawfare, titled “Can Litigation Help Deradicalize Right-Wing Media?,” Vindman wrote, “After I testified about then-President Trump’s misconduct on Ukraine before the House impeachment inquiry, Trump and his allies targeted me and my family for retribution.”

Get market news worthy of your time with Axios Markets. Subscribe for free.

  • He said “Trump proxies amplified these themes on television news, internet news, and social media, resulting in risks to my life and my reputation as a public servant, and that he “did not respond forcefully to the threats and defamation.”

Of note: Some First Amendment advocates worry that defamation lawsuits can be used as a vehicle to silence the press. And Vindman notes in his op-ed that the First Amendment “gravely limits the available tools to seek accountability for the right-wing media.”

  • “Nevertheless, there are ways to dismantle the right-wing ecosystem of disinformation, an ecosystem that does not begin with insurrection but with more mundane lies,” he added.

  • “Like the many political elites driving insurrection to advance their political aims, the right-wing media is also motivated by a bottom-line calculation: viewers, market share and advertising dollars.”

Our thought bubble, via Axios’ Sara Fischer: Defamation lawsuits and threats against Fox and other conservative personalities and networks have so far proven somewhat effective in squashing election fraud hoaxes.

More from Axios: Sign up to get the latest market trends with Axios Markets. Subscribe for free

Read original article here

Trump launches right-wing cable media blitz but says it’s ‘too early’ to talk 2024

President Trump made the right-wing cable news rounds on Wednesday night, with appearances on three television networks: Newsmax, One America News Network, and Fox News. He began on Newsmax, where host Greg Kelly repeatedly pressed Trump on whether he might run for president again in 2024.

“As far as ’24, too early to say,” Trump responded.

Pressed multiple times on whether he would mount another run for the White House, Trump demurred.

“I won’t say yet,” Trump said.

Trump, who has largely been out of public view since his Jan. 6 rally in Washington, also cited a rally a few hundred supporters held for him on Monday as evidence of the strength of “the whole MAGA movement.”

The interviews were ostensibly about conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh, who died on Wednesday. Trump also called into Fox News to address the broadcaster’s death on Wednesday afternoon.

Limbaugh had been a vocal Trump supporter, and appeared with the real estate mogul multiple times during his run for president in 2016. Trump awarded Limbaugh the Presidential Medal of Freedom during his State of the Union address in February 2020.

On Newsmax, Trump repeatedly praised Limbaugh as an unparalleled radio talent and “a great guy,” but he also used the 20-minute conversation to take shots at politicians from both parties, and to make several false claims about his loss to Joe Biden in last year’s presidential election. The former president simultaneously appeared on OANN, where he said that Limbaugh also believed Trump was “robbed” in the campaign. Trump is due to close out the evening with an appearance on Fox News.

Joe Biden at a town hall event in Milwaukee on Tuesday. (Evan Vucci/AP)

In the past week, Biden has criticized Trump for providing bad information about the status of the country’s supply COVID-19 vaccines. On Newsmax, Trump suggested Biden was pretending there were “no vaccines” and defended his handling of the vaccine rollout.

“We were giving millions of shots and millions of doses, so he was either not telling the truth or he’s mentally gone,” Trump said of Biden.

The White House declined to comment on Trump’s appearances. Biden’s administration has said the number of doses sent to states each week has gone up 57 percent since he took office on Jan. 20.

Once a constant presence on cable news and social media, Trump has kept a low public profile since Biden’s inauguration. Last month, he was de-platformed by major social media companies in the aftermath of the attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Both Facebook and Twitter cited the risk of further violence. In the weeks leading up to the attack, Trump used his public perch to spread baseless conspiracy theories about Biden’s victory. He also urged supporters to fight the transfer of power, including in a fiery rally speech held on the national mall just before the Capitol attack. Trump repeated his false claims about the election on Newsmax.

“Really bad and dishonest things happened,” Trump said of the vote. “It’s a disgrace. It’s like a Third World country with the elections.”

Officials from both parties and experts have all declared there was no credible evidence of fraud in conjunction with last year’s election. Newsmax, which is openly supportive of Trump, had previously echoed his conspiracy theories about the vote. However, in December the network clarified its coverage amid the threat of defamation lawsuits from a voting software company. Since then, guests have been cut off from making false claims about the election on the channel.

Trump boards Marine One on the South Lawn of the White House on Jan. 20. (Alex Brandon/AP)

Trump’s interview with Newsmax was not broadcast live, and Newsmax CEO Chris Ruddy did not respond to questions about whether the conversation was pre-taped to prevent Trump from making false allegations about specific software companies. Greg Kelly, the host who interviewed the former president, was unresponsive whenever Trump made comments questioning the vote.

On Newsmax, Trump addressed his diminished media footprint, suggesting that he is “looking at a lot of different things,” including joining different sites or starting one of his own.

“We’re negotiating with a number of people and there’s also the other option of building your own site,” Trump said, adding, “It’s become very boring. We don’t want to go back to Twitter.”

Since leaving the White House, his public presence has largely been limited to emailed statements. On Tuesday, he released a 600-word diatribe blasting Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who had penned a Wall Street Journal editorial blaming Trump for the Capitol attack.

Kelly asked Trump on Wednesday if he was interested in following Limbaugh’s footsteps on talk radio. Trump coyly called the idea “one of those little things that keeps popping up,” but indicated it would be hard to replace Limbaugh.

“A lot of people are mentioning that, and no, it’s not anything that I’ve thought about. He’d be a hard one to replace,” Trump said of Limbaugh. “I’d say he’s irreplaceable.”

Trump was far more direct when Kelly asked if he missed being president.

“I do,” Trump said. “Everything was happening great. … It’s too bad.”

Read original article here

Brandon Straka, Right-Wing Activist Banned From Airline, Is Charged in Riots

A right-wing activist known for his unwavering support for former President Trump and urging Democrats to walk away from their party has been arrested for participating in the Capitol insurrection.

Brandon Straka, 43, has been charged with several crimes, including impeding a law enforcement officer during civil disorder and engaging in disorderly conduct with the intent to disturb a hearing before Congress, for his role in the Jan. 6 siege.

The ex-New York City hairstylist and self-described “former liberal” is best known for starting the “WalkAway Campaign,” which urged liberal voters to leave the Democratic Party. Earlier this month, Straka announced Facebook had removed the campaign’s page, which had over half a million followers.

In June, Straka also made national headlines after he was banned from American Airlines for refusing to wear a mask on a flight to Dallas amid the coronavirus pandemic.

In a criminal complaint unsealed Monday, prosecutors state Straka posted several photos and videos during and after the riots. The court documents say investigators were clued into Straka’s involvement when a tipster indicated he had posted a video on Twitter on Jan. 6 in which the activist shouted, “Go, Go!” near the entrance of the Capitol.

“Also—be embarrassed & hide if you need to- but I was there. It was not Antifa at the Capitol. It was freedom-loving Patriots who were DESPERATE to fight for the final hope of our Republic because literally, nobody cares about them. Everyone else can denounce them. I will not,” Straka also wrote in a Jan. 6 tweet.

Prosecutors allege that Straka took multiple videos during and after the riots. In one Jan. 7 video, the activist admits: “Yesterday, a lot of us got up very, very early. We went to this event in which Donald Trump spoke. The plan was always to go to the Capitol. We were going to march from that event…to the Capitol, and there was going to be another rally. I was one of the speakers slated to speak at the Capitol.”

Straka says that as he was walking to the Capitol, he’d learned “patriots had entered” it.

“Wow, so they’re going to basically storm and try to get into the chamber so that they can demand that we get the investigation that we want,” he says in the Jan. 7 video, according to the complaint.

Straka then claimed he saw “bursts of teargas coming out of the doors.”

“Shortly after that, a man came out” who told him, “They’ve cleared Congress. Everybody’s left. There’s no one else inside. Everybody turn around. No one else come inside,’” Straka says.

Despite Straka’s lengthy video claiming he was not directly involved in the riots, screenshots of his Twitter account show that he encouraged MAGA supporters to storm the Capitol.

“Patriots at the Capitol – HOLD. THE. LINE!!!!” he wrote in one Jan. 6 tweet. In another, Straka added that he “arrived at the Capitol a few hours ago as Patriots were storming from all sides. I was quite close to entering myself as police began tear-gassing us from the door.”

“I’m completely confused. For 6-8 weeks everybody on the right has been saying ‘1776!’ & that if congress moves forward it will mean a revolution! So congress moves forward. Patriots storm the Capitol—now everybody is virtual signaling their embarrassment that this happened,” Straka wrote in another post.

The complaint notes that the FBI received many tips about his involvement, including one from a relative, who said they saw a video of Straka on the “cusp” of entering the Capitol. The relative added that Straka can be heard saying, “We’re going in. We’re going in,” in a video later posted on Youtube with the title, “Straka attacking the Capitol on Jan 6th.”

In the eight-minute video taken on Jan. 6, a Capitol Police officer is seen holding a protective shield as he tries to stop a crowd of rioters. As individuals push past the officer to break into the Capitol, Straka is heard yelling, “Take it away from him” and “Take the shield!”

Several people in the crowd then grab the officer’s shield as Straka continues to yell: “Take it! Take it!”

As Straka continues to move closer to the Capitol entrance, he turns the camera around to face himself and states: “They’re using gas. We’re being gassed right now.”

Straka’s popularity among right-wingers surged after he started the “WalkAway” campaign in 2018. On Monday, he was a guest on Newsmax host Greg Kelly’s podcast to discuss “his war with far-leftists” and Facebook’s decision to remove his campaign page.

It was not immediately clear when the interview was taped. (According to court records, however, prosecutors originally filed charges against Straka on Jan. 20.)

In June, Straka was barred from American Airlines after refusing to wear a mask on a flight to Dallas. After a heated exchange with an airline employee during boarding for the flight at La Guardia Airport, he was ushered off the plane.

In an interview with The New York Times after the incident, Straka claimed he had a medical condition that prevented him from wearing a mask. (Straka, however, did not elaborate on his condition.)

“My feeling was that the airline succumbed to mob mentality, which, I feel, is happening all over the place in our country right now,” Straka insisted.



Read original article here