Tag Archives: revoked

FBI employees had security clearances revoked after speaking out against ‘politicized rot’: House report – Fox News

  1. FBI employees had security clearances revoked after speaking out against ‘politicized rot’: House report Fox News
  2. GOP Congressman’s ‘FBI Whistleblowers’ Testify Publicly Before Congress I U.S. House Hearing Live CNN-News18
  3. Jim Jordan’s FBI whistleblowers testify publicly before Congress as questions about their legitimacy remain CNN
  4. FBI whistleblowers say pro-life groups, Catholics were ‘target of the government’: Jordan Fox News
  5. Plaskett Slams GOP For ‘Rushing’ To Defund Police After FBI Whistleblowers Newsweek
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Easthampton superintendent candidate offer revoked after addressing school committee as ‘ladies’ – Western Massachusetts News

  1. Easthampton superintendent candidate offer revoked after addressing school committee as ‘ladies’ Western Massachusetts News
  2. School executive says he was denied top job for addressing women as ‘ladies’ New York Post
  3. School superintendent candidate says job offer was rescinded after calling two females ‘ladies’ in email Fox News
  4. Easthampton rescinds job offer for superintendent over term ‘ladies’: Protest over dismissal of Vito Perrone MassLive.com
  5. Easthampton school superintendent job offer abruptly rescinded GazetteNET

Read original article here

Twitter blue checks reportedly purchased by Taliban officials revoked

The verified “blue check” for senior Taliban officials on Twitter appears to have been revoked following media reports that they paid the social media site’s $8 monthly subscription fee for the verified status.

Two officials with the Taliban subscribed to the Twitter Blue service, a monthly service offered after new owner Elon Musk took over the social media platform, the New York Post reported. 

The BBC reported earlier Tuesday that Taliban officials Abdul Haq Hammad, the top media official at the Afghan Ministry of Information and Culture, and Hedayatullah Hedayat, the head of the Taliban’s department for “access to information,” paid for the blue check.

9 AFGHAN MEN LASHED IN PUBLIC FOR CRIMES UNDER COUNTRY’S NEW RULERS

Taliban fighters patrol in Kabul, Afghanistan. The Taliban has used Twitter for years and has praised Elon Musk since he purchased the platform. (AP Photo/Rahmat Gul  / AP Images)

Some Taliban supporters also acquired the blue check, though the symbol was not visible on their account pages. After the report, their verified status disappeared, the Post reported. 

Fox News Digital has reached out to Twitter. 

The Taliban, which took over Afghanistan in August 2021 following the withdrawal of American forces, has long used Twitter, though officials were never verified. 

“Interestingly, Taliban praises Elon Musk for verifying their accounts and even they say Elon is originally Afghan, from Logar province. Congratulations Elon!” tweeted Tajuden Soroush, an Afghan journalist who lives in London.

Before Musk purchased Twitter in a $44 billion acquisition, check marks were given to certain accounts to verify their status as journalists, public figures, elected officials, celebrities and other prominent figures. 

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS

After the purchase, Musk introduced Twitter Blue, which allows users to pay $8 per month in exchange for a blue checkmark.

The move got off to a rough start as pranksters began creating accounts of political leaders and sports stars while posting incendiary tweets. 

Read original article here

Two MoMA employees stabbed by man whose membership was revoked, police say; investigation ongoing

MIDTOWN, Manhattan (WABC) — Two employees were stabbed inside the Museum of Modern Art on Saturday afternoon, police say.

Police say the suspect, came to the museum around 4:15 p.m. and stabbed two employees. They say the suspect was a member of the museum and had just received a letter revoking his membership a day prior. The man wanted to see a film and jumped the reception desk and proceeded to attack and stab the employees in the back, collar bone, and neck.

Both victims were taken to Bellevue Hospital, where they are in stable condition and expected to be okay.

Police say they know who the suspect is because they are looking for him in connection with two prior incidents in Midtown. Employees of the museum also know the suspect, because he is a museum regular. He was seen on surveillance video fleeing the museum after the attack.

WATCH: Police hold update on stabbing at MoMA

He is described as a 60-year-old white man with a black jacket and a blue surgical mask. Under his jacket, he has a colorful patterned shirt and a hood.

Museumgoers inside said the scene inside was chaos during the incident.

“i was watching Picasso and Cezanne, you know, just enjoying the museum and suddenly they said, ‘museum is closed’ and people started running,” said David Durejko.

Durejko said there was panic on the escalators.

“Then they started shouting ‘get out, get out for your own safety,'” he added.

Dee Daily was in the gift shop with his daughter, when employees rushed them to a safe room in the basement.

“It was nerve racking. I was trying to keep myself calm for my daughter,” he said.

A tourist named Missy says she saw the horror unfold as everyone raced out.

“I saw like the ribbon there with ‘police’ written on it. Then a woman lying like sitting on the floor alive, but then I think I saw a patch of blood on the wall,: she said.

Some people, like Evelyn from Vienna, who had a ticket for Saturday, are counting their blessings they were not inside.

“I’m shocked, it’s terrible,” she said, “I came her by taxi hoping to see the exhibit, but…”

MoMA announced they will be closed Sunday as police investigate and continue to search for the suspect.

ALSO READ | Police: Bronx couple murders roommate after he made noise complaint

———-
* Get Eyewitness News Delivered
* More Manhattan news
* Send us a news tip
* Download the abc7NY app for breaking news alerts
* Follow us on YouTube

Submit a News Tip

Copyright © 2022 WABC-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Read original article here

MSNBC guest ‘shocked’ Florida surgeon general’s medical license wasn’t revoked: ‘we need to get this man’

Dr. Uché Blackstock went on a rant against Florida’s surgeon general, Joseph Ladapo, on MSNBC’s “ReidOut” Wednesday, saying she was “shocked” his license had not been revoked over his stance on COVID-19. 

“I mean, essentially, he’s violating the Hippocratic Oath – which is do no harm. So every time he gets up there at a press conference or a hearing, and says something that is anti-science, he’s violating the Hippocratic Oath. And at this point, I am shocked that his license hasn’t been suspended or revoked,” she said.

Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo and Gov. Ron DeSantis
(Joe Cavaretta/Sun Sentinel/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)

The segment highlighted a hearing at a Florida Senate committee in which Ladapo was grilled on vaccines. The legislature’s Democrats, disappointed with the responses, walked out of the hearing and said they would not vote to confirm Ladapo. 

Ladapo had said during the hearing that he believes vaccines are effective at preventing severe COVID-19 cases.

“They [vaccines] reduce the risk of hospitalization and death from COVID-19 … I don’t think the objective of public health is coercion. I think it’s education, and I think it’s to allow people to make choices, so they don’t feel coerced,” said Ladapo to reporters. 

Florida State Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo
(Paul Hennessy/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

Blackstock also said that she was “mortified” to have attended the same prestigious medical school as Ladapo, who was appointed by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis in September. The MSNBC guest added an ominous statement saying, “We need to round up our girls and go down there and get this man because he is dangerous.”

FLORIDA SURGEON GENERAL, ATTACKED BY LEFT, PROMISES STATE WON’T BE ‘SENSELESS’ IN COVID RESPONSE

“I think [Ladapo] has ulterior motives: power, influence, money – is probably also very important to him. I don’t think he actually believes vaccines are [not] effective. I bet he is vaccinated and boosted. I bet his entire family is. I bet his children, if they’re eligible, are also vaccinated. So this is all because of politics, because he has not prioritized … his medical duties.”

Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine
(AP Photo/Nam Y. Huh)

Florida’s Department of Health Communications Director Weesam Koury released a statement to Fox News following Joy Reid’s segment saying, “We wish Joy well and hope she finds peace.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“We don’t feel that we are getting any answers met,” a state Democrat said after the hearing. “We know that there is a long agenda today with a lot of bills. So the Florida Senate Democrats in this committee now are going to abstain, walk out and come back when we have more business to attend to.”

Even without their colleagues on the left side of the aisle, Republicans voted to confirm Ladapo.

Read original article here

Novak Djokovic has visa revoked a second time in Australia, expected to appeal

Novak Djokovic faces deportation again after the Australian government revoked his visa for a second time, the latest twist in the ongoing saga over whether the No. 1-ranked tennis player will be allowed to compete in the Australian Open despite being unvaccinated for COVID-19.

Immigration Minister Alex Hawke said Friday that he used his ministerial discretion to cancel the 34-year-old Serb’s visa on public interest grounds — just three days before play begins at the Australian Open, where Djokovic has won a record nine of his 20 Grand Slam titles.

Three hours later, Djokovic’s lawyers began their appeal against the visa cancellation in an after-hours hearing at the Federal Circuit and Family Court. The same judge, Anthony Kelly, ruled in favor of Djokovic earlier this week on procedural grounds after his visa was first canceled when he landed at a Melbourne airport.

Djokovic’s lawyer Nick Wood told Kelly he hoped that an appeal will be heard Sunday and that Djokovic would have his visa returned in time for him to play Monday, when the top half of the draw is set to compete.

Djokovic remains free Friday night but would effectively return to immigration detention when he meets with Australian Border Force officials at 8 a.m. Saturday (4 p.m. ET Friday).

He would spend the morning at his lawyers’ offices under Border Force guard and return to hotel detention Saturday afternoon.

Deportation from Australia can lead to a three-year ban from the country, although that may be waived, depending on the circumstances.

Hawke said he canceled the visa on “health and good order grounds, on the basis that it was in the public interest to do so.” His statement added that Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s government “is firmly committed to protecting Australia’s borders, particularly in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic.”

Djokovic’s main ground of appeal against Hawke’s decision was that it was not based on the health risk that the tennis champion might pose by not being vaccinated but on how he might be perceived by anti-vaxxers.

“The minister only considers the potential for exciting anti-vax sentiment in the event that he’s present,” Wood said.

Hawke’s reasons do not take into account the potential impact on anti-vaxxers of Djokovic being forcibly removed, Wood said.

“The minister gives no consideration whatsoever to what effect that may have on anti-vax sentiment and indeed on public order,” Wood said. “That seems patently irrational.”

Morrison welcomed Djokovic’s pending deportation. The whole episode has touched a nerve in Australia, particularly in Victoria state, where locals went through hundreds of days of lockdowns during the worst of the pandemic and there is a vaccination rate among adults of more than 90%.

Australia is facing a massive surge in coronavirus cases driven by the highly transmissible omicron variant. On Friday, the nation reported 130,000 new cases, including nearly 35,000 in Victoria state. Although many infected people aren’t getting as sick as they did in previous outbreaks, the surge is still putting a severe strain on the health system, with more than 4,400 people hospitalized. It’s also causing disruptions to workplaces and supply chains.

“This pandemic has been incredibly difficult for every Australian, but we have stuck together and saved lives and livelihoods. … Australians have made many sacrifices during this pandemic, and they rightly expect the result of those sacrifices to be protected,” Morrison said in a statement. “This is what the Minister is doing in taking this action today.”

Everyone at the Australian Open — including players, their support teams and spectators — is required to be vaccinated for COVID-19. Djokovic is not inoculated and had sought a medical exemption on the grounds that he had COVID-19 in December.

That exemption was approved by the Victoria state government and Tennis Australia, apparently allowing him to obtain a visa to travel. But the Australian Border Force rejected the exemption and canceled his visa when he landed in Melbourne on Jan. 5.

Djokovic spent four nights in an immigration detention hotel before a judge on Monday overturned that decision. That ruling allowed Djokovic to move freely around Australia, and he has been practicing at Melbourne Park daily to prepare to play in a tournament he has won each of the past three years.

Australian Open organizers announced the top half of the men’s and women’s draws will be played Monday. That means Djokovic, the top seed, would have to play on Day 1 of the tournament.

He had a practice session scheduled for midafternoon Friday at Rod Laver Arena, the tournament’s main stadium, but pushed that to the morning and was finished several hours before Hawke’s decision was announced in the early evening.

After the visa cancellation, media started gathering outside the building where Djokovic reportedly was meeting with his lawyers.

An Australian Open spokeswoman said tournament organizers did not have any immediate comment on the latest development in Djokovic’s situation, which has overshadowed all other storylines heading into the year’s first Grand Slam event.

“It’s not a good situation for anyone,” said Andy Murray, a three-time Grand Slam champion and five-time runner-up at the Australian Open. “Just want it obviously to get resolved. I think it would be good for everyone if that was the case. It just seems like it’s dragged on for quite a long time now — not great for the tennis, not great for the Australian Open, not great for Novak.”

World No. 4 Stefanos Tsitsipas, speaking before Hawke’s decision, said Djokovic was “playing by his own rules” and making vaccinated players “look like fools.”

Tennis Australia announced that nine players would hold pre-tournament news conferences Saturday, and Djokovic’s name was not on the list.

play

1:15

Andy Murray says Novak Djokovic’s ongoing visa controversy isn’t good for the Australian Open.

With his legal situation in limbo, Djokovic was placed in the tournament bracket in Thursday’s draw, slated to face Miomir Kecmanovic in an all-Serbian matchup in the first round.

According to Grand Slam rules, if Djokovic is forced to pull out of the tournament before the order of play for Day 1 is announced, No. 5 seed Andrey Rublev would move into Djokovic’s spot in the bracket and face Kecmanovic.

If Djokovic withdraws from the tournament after Monday’s schedule is released, he would be replaced in the field by what’s known as a “lucky loser” — a player who loses in the qualifying tournament but gets into the main draw because of another player’s exit before competition has started.

And if Djokovic plays in a match and then is told he can no longer participate in the tournament, his next opponent would simply advance to the following round and there would be no replacement.

Melbourne-based immigration lawyer Kian Bone said Djokovic’s lawyers face an “extremely difficult” task to get court orders over the weekend to allow their client to play next week.

Speaking hours before Hawke’s decision was announced, Bone said: “If you left it any later than he has done now, I think from a strategic standpoint, he’s really hamstringing Djokovic’s legal team, in terms of what sort of options or remedies he could obtain.”

The Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report.

Read original article here

Novak Djokovic has Australian visa revoked again, putting him at risk of deportation

Immigration minister Alex Hawke announced the decision in a statement on Friday, after days of deliberation about whether to eject the Serbian star from the country.

It is unclear whether Australia will move to deport Djokovic as the decision can still be challenged by his legal team.

“Today I exercised my power under section 133C(3) of the Migration Act to cancel the visa held by Mr Novak Djokovic on health and good order grounds, on the basis that it was in the public interest to do so,” the statement said.

“In making this decision, I carefully considered information provided to me by the Department of Home Affairs, the Australian Border Force and Mr Djokovic. The Morrison Government is firmly committed to protecting Australia’s borders, particularly in relation to the Covid-19 pandemic.”

The decision comes four days after a judge ruled that Australian Border Force (ABF) officers had been “unreasonable” when they canceled his initial visa to enter Australia on his arrival in the country on January 5. The judge ordered Djokovic be freed from immigration detention within 30 minutes.
The second cancellation is the latest twist in a saga that has garnered global headlines and put Australia’s Covid and immigration policies under scrutiny.

Under current Australian laws, all international arrivals are required to be vaccinated against Covid-19 — which Djokovic is not — unless they have a medical exemption.

Djokovic said he was under the impression he could enter because two independent panels associated with Tennis Australia and the Victorian state government had granted him an exemption on the grounds that he had been infected with Covid-19 in December. The federal government argued that under its rules previous infection with Covid-19 is not a valid reason for an exemption.

Despite Monday’s ruling, the immigration minister retained ministerial power to personally intervene in the case and ultimately had the final say as to whether Djokovic would be allowed to stay, though his decision can be appealed.

In his ruling, the judge noted that if Djokovic had been deported, he would have been banned from Australia for three years. However this can be waived in special circumstances.

How it came to this

Djokovic arrived in Melbourne on January 5 and promptly had his visa canceled for entering the country without a valid reason why he couldn’t be vaccinated against Covid-19.

He spent several nights in a detention hotel in Melbourne, which also houses dozens of refugees — some of whom have been held in immigration detention for more than eight years.

His lawyers challenged the decision and won the legal battle on Monday, but since then questions have emerged over Djokovic’s behavior after testing positive for Covid-19 on December 16.

In a statement published to social media on Wednesday, Djokovic acknowledged he did not immediately isolate after receiving a positive diagnosis — but denied knowing he had the virus when attending several public events.

He also apologized for apparently false information on his Australia visa declaration, specifically that he hadn’t traveled in the 14 days before his arrival in the country. Photos taken during that period appear to show him in both Spain and Serbia.

Djokovic said a member of his support staff submitted the information and the omission had been “human error.”

In the statement, Djokovic also admitted doing an interview and photo shoot with a French sports newspaper while Covid positive, which he conceded was an “error of judgment.”

The visa dispute and decision whether to allow unvaccinated Djokovic — who has previously voiced opposition to Covid-19 vaccines and vaccine mandates — into the country comes at a time when Covid-19 case numbers are soaring.

On Friday, the state of Victoria — home to Melbourne where the Australian Open is being held — reported 34,836 cases, with a record 976 people hospitalized with Covid-19. This week the country surpassed one million cases over the entire pandemic.

Before the decision, Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić has said he was “proud” to help the tennis star during the visa dispute but acknowledged it was “necessary that people are vaccinated.”

He also appeared to indirectly address Djokovic’s admission that he did not immediately isolate after testing positive for Covid-19 in December.

“If you know you are infected, you shouldn’t be going out in public,” Vučić said in an interview with public broadcaster Radio Television of Serbia (RTS).

Meanwhile, Serbian Prime Minister Ana Brnabić told the BBC it would be “a clear breach of rules” if Djokovic was at a public event after knowing he had tested positive.

What could come next

Maria Jockel, legal principal of BDO Migration Services, said Djokovic’s lawyers will have 28 days to make representations to the minister, stating why he should reverse his decision.

During that time he could be sent back to immigration detention, most likely the Park Hotel in Melbourne, while his lawyers discuss their next move.

Despite his visa being canceled once again, experts say it is still possible Djokovic could be released on another visa to contest the Australian Open.

“If there’s a incredible outcry about having the world’s number one tennis players in detention whilst the Australian Open is on, maybe the government would relent and let him out on a bridging visa,” said Abul Rizvi, a former deputy secretary with the immigration department.

A bridging visa would allow him to work — or in his case his play — but the political repercussions of that decision are unclear as it would seem to contradict the message that Djokovic poses a health risk to the Australian people.

Read original article here

Double-fault: Visa revoked again, Djokovic faces deportation

MELBOURNE, Australia (AP) — Novak Djokovic faces deportation again after the Australian government revoked his visa for a second time, the latest twist in the ongoing saga over whether the No. 1-ranked tennis player will be allowed to compete in the Australian Open despite being unvaccinated for COVID-19.

Immigration Minister Alex Hawke said Friday he used his ministerial discretion to cancel the 34-year-old Serb’s visa on public interest grounds — just three days before play begins at the Australian Open, where Djokovic has won a record nine of his 20 Grand Slam titles.

Djokovic’s lawyers were expected to appeal at the Federal Circuit and Family Court, which they already successfully did last week on procedural grounds after his visa was first canceled when he landed at a Melbourne airport.

A hearing was scheduled for Friday night.

Deportation from Australia can lead to a three-year ban on returning to the country, although that may be waived, depending on the circumstances.

Hawke said he canceled the visa on “health and good order grounds, on the basis that it was in the public interest to do so.” His statement added that Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s government “is firmly committed to protecting Australia’s borders, particularly in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic.”

Morrison himself welcomed Djokovic’s pending deportation. The whole episode has touched a nerve in Australia, and particularly in Victoria state, where locals went through hundreds of days of lockdowns during the worst of the pandemic and there is a vaccination rate among adults of more than 90%.

Australia is currently facing a massive surge in virus cases driven by the highly transmissible omicron variant. On Friday, the nation reported 130,000 new cases, including nearly 35,000 in Victoria state. Although many infected people aren’t getting as sick as they did in previous outbreaks, the surge is still putting severe strain on the health system, with more than 4,400 people hospitalized. It’s also causing disruptions to workplaces and supply chains.

“This pandemic has been incredibly difficult for every Australian but we have stuck together and saved lives and livelihoods. … Australians have made many sacrifices during this pandemic, and they rightly expect the result of those sacrifices to be protected,” Morrison said in a statement. “This is what the Minister is doing in taking this action today.”

Everyone at the Australian Open — including players, their support teams and spectators — is required to be vaccinated for the illness caused by the coronavirus. Djokovic is not inoculated and had sought a medical exemption on the grounds that he had COVID-19 in December.

That exemption was approved by the Victoria state government and Tennis Australia, apparently allowing him to obtain a visa to travel. But the Australian Border Force rejected the exemption and canceled his visa when he landed in Melbourne on Jan. 5.

Djokovic spent four nights in an immigration detention hotel before a judge on Monday overturned that decision. That ruling allowed Djokovic to move freely around Australia and he has been practicing at Melbourne Park daily to prepare to play in a tournament he has won each of the past three years.

He had a practice session originally scheduled for mid-afternoon Friday at Rod Laver Arena, the tournament’s main stadium, but pushed that to the morning and was finished several hours before Hawke’s decision was announced in the early evening.

After the visa cancellation from Hawke, media started gathering outside the building where Djokovic reportedly was meeting with his lawyers.

An Australian Open spokeswoman said tournament organizers did not have any immediate comment on the latest development in Djokovic’s situation, which has overshadowed all other story lines heading into the year’s first Grand Slam event.

Tennis Australia announced that nine players would hold pre-tournament news conferences Saturday, and Djokovic’s name was not on the list.

With his legal situation still in limbo, Djokovic was placed in the tournament bracket in Thursday’s draw, slated to face Miomir Kecmanovic in an all-Serbian matchup in the first round.

According to Grand Slam rules, if Djokovic is forced to pull out of the tournament before the order of play for Day 1 is announced, No. 5 seed Rublev would move into Djokovic’s spot in the bracket and face Kecmanovic.

If Djokovic withdraws from the tournament after Monday’s schedule is released, he would be replaced in the field by what’s known as a “lucky loser” — a player who loses in the qualifying tournament but gets into the main draw because of another player’s exit before competition has started.

And if Djokovic plays in a match — or more — and then is told he can no longer participate in the tournament, his next opponent would simply advance to the following round and there would be no replacement.

Melbourne-based immigration lawyer Kian Bone said Djokovic’s lawyers face an “extremely difficult” task to get court orders over the weekend to allow their client to play next week.

Speaking hours before Hawke’s decision was announced, Bone said: “If you left it any later than he has done now, I think from a strategic standpoint, he’s really hamstringing Djokovic’s legal team, in terms of what sort of options or remedies he could obtain.”

Djokovic’s lawyers would need to go before a duty judge of the Federal Circuit and Family Court, or a higher judge of the Federal Court, to get two urgent orders. One order would be an injunction preventing his deportation, such as what he won in court last week.

The second would force Hawke to grant Djokovic a visa to play.

“That second order is almost not precedented,” Bone said. “Very rarely do the courts order a member of the executive government to grant a visa.”

___

McGuirk reported from Canberra, Australia.

___

More AP tennis: https://apnews.com/apf-Tennis and https://twitter.com/AP_Sports



Read original article here

5 times Emmy awards have been revoked or withdrawn

The Emmys giveth, and the Emmys taketh away. 

Just like any splashy televised awards ceremony, the Emmys have had their share of controversy over the years — including pivoting on whom to honor with trophies and nominations.

The Oscars might have made the biggest splash in recent memory for the infamous 2017 “Moonlight”/“La La Land” snafu, but the movies don’t get to dominate award season scandals.

On the eve of Emmys 2021 — broadcasting live Sunday at 8 p.m. on CBS from the Microsoft Theater in Los Angeles — we take a look back at the surprisingly colorful history of revoked nominations and awards. 

Andrew Cuomo 

The disgraced ex-governor of New York, 63, is the most recent winner of the dubious honor. He was given the International Emmy Founders Award in 2020 for his much-lauded communication during his press conferences throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. However, after he resigned in August following allegations that he sexually harassed 11 women during his tenure in office, the International Academy of Arts and Sciences stripped his Emmy. “His name and any reference to his receiving the award will be eliminated from International Academy materials going forward,” the organization said in a statement. 

Henry Winkler

Henry Winkler finally won his Emmy in 2018.
Mike Blake/REUTERS

Unlike Cuomo, Winkler, 75, got his Emmy honor taken away for innocent reasons — a quirk of TV scheduling.

Nearly two decades before he finally won his first trophy in 2018 for HBO’s “Barry,” Winkler was nominated for Outstanding Guest Actor in a Comedy for NBC’s short-lived 2000 series “Battery Park.”

Winkler’s episode was set to air that April, but when the show was axed after only four episodes, the network booted the show to the summer. Since that made Winkler’s appearance on the show happen after the May 31 cut-off for Emmy eligibility, it was deemed ineligible.

Bruce Willis went on to take home that category’s trophy that year (for “Friends”), while Winkler still got a nomination in 2000 (for the guest actor in a drama category) for “The Practice.” 

Kevin Spacey 

Kevin Spacey in “House of Cards.”
Netflix via AP

In the summer of 2017, the Academy announced that Spacey, 62, would receive the International Emmy Founders Award in November’s ceremony for his global contribution to the arts — mostly due to his starring role in the political drama “House of Cards,” which helped Netflix become a force and changed the game for streaming.

In October of that same year, “Star Trek’s” Anthony Rapp, 49, alleged that Spacey made a sexual advance toward him in 1986 when Rapp was 14.

Soon after, a slew of men followed with similar accusations and Netflix severed ties, removing Spacey from the final season of “House of Cards.”

On Oct. 30, 2017, the International TV Academy announced that it would no longer present Spacey with the 2017 International Emmy Founders Award “in light of recent events.” 

“This Is Us” 

Oops! Mandy Moore, left, and Milo Ventimiglia didn’t have adequately modern costumes in “This Is Us.”
Ron Batzdorff/NBC

Yes, even the hit crowd-pleasing tearjerker hasn’t emerged from the Emmys unscathed. The reason? All of the show’s time-hopping within its story. In 2017, NBC’s then-freshman drama racked up an impressive 11 nominations, including the category for Outstanding Contemporary Costumes. However, in August of that year, it was announced that “House of Cards” would replace it on the ballot (bringing the show’s nomination count down to 10) because, in order to be eligible for “contemporary” costumes, 51% of the submitted episodes must be set within the last 25 years. The show’s submitted episode, “Moonshadow,” mostly took place in the 1970s, focusing on Jack (Milo Ventimiglia) and Rebecca’s (Mandy Moore) relationship. So, blame them for the revoked Emmy nod. 

Jason Sudeikis 

Jason Sudeikis in “Ted Lasso.”
Apple TV Plus via AP

Even Ted Lasso himself got rejected. Sudeikis’s warm and fuzzy AppleTV sports series might be the Emmy darling this year – with a whopping 20 nods — but the former “SNL” star wasn’t always so lucky.

In 2016, he was initially given a nod in the category of guest actors in a comedy for the Fox series “The Last Man on Earth.” However, Season 2 of that show had 18 episodes, and because Sudeikis appeared in 11 of them (playing Mike Miller, astronaut brother of Will Forte’s character, Phil), he was in over 50% of the episodes.

This made him no longer eligible as a guest star, per Emmy rules. Unfortunately for Sudeikis, it wasn’t possible to switch him to the “supporting actor” category instead of “guest” because the error didn’t come to light until voting had already started.

So, he was disqualified. At least he’s having the last laugh this year.

Read original article here

Tory Lanez Violated Megan Thee Stallion Protective Order, Prosecutors Want Bail Revoked

Read original article here