Tag Archives: responsibility

Uganda bombings: Islamic State claims responsibility for Kampala suicide attacks

Two civilians and a police officer were killed in the blasts, police spokesperson Fred Enanga told reporters at a news conference in the city.

The ISIS-affiliated Amaq News Agency reported the incident on its Telegram channel on Tuesday, saying three fighters set out with bags loaded with explosives. Two headed toward the Kampala Central Police Station, and the third to the parliament building, where they detonated, it reported.

Police said the attacks bore the hallmarks of the Allied Democratic Forces (ADF), an Islamist rebel group affiliated with ISIS.

In a statement on Tuesday, Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni raised the number of people injured from 33 to 36. He said three attackers died while detonating their bombs and seven were killed while resisting arrest. A total of 81 suspects have been arrested, Museveni said.

“Apart from hunting the terrorists, the country’s strategy of vigilance (alertness), is helping to minimize damage,” Museveni said.

“Therefore, the public should maintain vigilance of checking people at entry points to bus parks, hotels, churches, mosques, markets,” he added.

The two explosions rocked the city center within five minutes of each other. Police said surveillance footage showed an adult male carrying a backpack detonating himself at 10:03 a.m. local time near the Central Police Station. Enanga said the attacker died instantly.

Two people were confirmed dead at the scene of the first blast, while 17 others sustained critical injuries, Enanga said in a statement.

Three minutes after the first explosion, two suicide bombers on motorcycles were seen detonating themselves near Raja Chambers and Jubilee Insurance Building along the central Kampala Parliament Avenue, Enanga said. The two bombers died and the body of a civilian was also found at the site, he added.

Enanga said 33 people were injured in the two blasts; five of them are in critical condition. The wounded are being treated at the Mulago National Referral Hospital.

Police pursued a fourth bomber, Enanga said, adding that two further bombs were recovered from his home that will be detonated safely.

Following the bombings, police and army personnel cordoned off streets around the blast sites and restricted traffic in the city.

Last month, an explosion in Kampala killed at least one person and injured several others. Reuters reported that the Islamic State had claimed responsibility for that blast.

Read original article here

Aaron Rodgers takes ‘responsibility’ for vaccine comments

Green Bay Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers, sidelined by Covid-19, acknowledged Tuesday that he “misled some people” regarding his vaccination status.

In an explosive interview last week on “The Pat McAfee Show” on Sirius XM, Rodgers confirmed he’s unvaccinated; claimed he’s allergic to vaccines and has taken ivermectin; said he is the victim of a “woke mob”; and acknowledged he’s been seeking Covid-19 advice from podcaster Joe Rogan.

“I made some comments that people might have felt were misleading and to anybody who felt mislead by those comments, I take full responsibility for those comments,” Rodgers told “The Pat McAfee Show” on Tuesday.

Later in the interview, the 37-year-old reigning NFL MVP acknowledged making misleading statements.

“I shared an opinion that is polarizing, I get it,” Rodgers said. “And I misled some people about my status which I take full responsibility of, those comments.”

The sidelined QB, though, didn’t back down from comments that now threaten his lucrative endorsement deals.

“But in the end, I have to stay true to who I am and what I’m about and I stand behind the things that I said,” Rodgers told the sports talk show. “And I have a ton of empathy for people who have been going through the worst part of this pandemic.”

Rodgers could be back on the field on Sunday when the Packers play the Seattle Seahawks.

“I’m excited about feeling better, I’m excited about moving forward and hopefully getting back with my team and getting back to doing what I do best and that’s playing ball,” Rodgers said.

“It’s been tough to be away form it. I’ve been obviously dealing with the Covid and I feel like I’m on the other side of it thankfully and thankful to still be able to have something to look forward to this weekend.”

The NFL is investigating whether the quarterback or team violated Covid-19 protocols.

In his interview last week, Rodgers invoked the memory of Martin Luther King Jr., claiming the slain civil rights leader would have agreed that he had a “moral obligation to object to unjust rules and rules that make no sense.”

Nearly 760,000 Americans have died from Covid-19, according to a running tally by NBC News.

Read original article here

‘Rust’ shooting: Checking Alec Baldwin’s gun was not the assistant director’s responsibility, attorney says

“He’s not responsible for checking it,” attorney Lisa Torraco said in an interview on Fox News on Monday. “That’s not the assistant director’s job. If he chooses to check the firearm because he wants to make sure that everyone’s safe, he can do that, but that’s not his responsibility.”

According to a detective’s search warrant affidavit filed last week, Halls acknowledged to investigators he should have checked all the rounds loaded in the weapon and “couldn’t recall if he spun the drum” before the fatal shooting October 21 that killed cinematographer Halyna Hutchins and injured director Joel Souza.

“David advised the incident was not a deliberate act,” the detective writes.

Torraco said Halls wasn’t required to check the gun.

“Expecting an assistant director to check a firearm is like telling the assistant director to check the camera angle or telling the assistant director to check sound or lighting,” Torraco said.

According to the New York Post, Halls, in his first public statement since the shooting, spoke of his relationship with Hutchins.

“Halyna Hutchins was not just one of the most talented people I’ve worked with, but also a friend,” he said in the statement. “I’m shocked and saddened by her death.”

Although Halls didn’t address details of the investigation, he did comment on changes he would like to see within the industry.

“It’s my hope that this tragedy prompts the industry to reevaluate its values and practices to ensure no one is harmed through the creative process again,” his statement read.

According to the Post, Halls said he has been “overwhelmed by the love and support” and that his “thoughts are with all who knew and loved Halyna.”

CNN has made repeated attempts to reach out to Halls and he has not responded. His attorney declined to comment to CNN on Monday.

How gun with live round got to Baldwin still a question

Torraco said witnesses have told her team that the armorer or the armorer’s assistant brought the gun on set.

Attorneys for Hannah Gutierrez Reed, the gun supervisor for the film, said her priority is safety.

“Ultimately this set would never have been compromised if live ammo were not introduced,” attorneys Jason Bowles and Robert Gorence said in a statement. “Hannah has no idea where the live rounds came from.”

Torraco said some witnesses told her team the armorer handed the gun directly to Baldwin and then Baldwin put it inside a holster. Some witnesses also said Baldwin wanted to adjust his holster and handed the firearm to Halls, who immediately handed the firearm back after the actor adjusted his holster, Torraco added.

According to Torraco, other witnesses have said the armorer brought the firearm in, another crew member checked the firearm, and then Halls checked the firearm “like a pass-through” and handed it to Baldwin “because he was between the two,” Torraco said.

But she said one thing has been erroneously reported about what Halls did that day.

“In the affidavits, it states that my client grabbed the gun off of a prop cart and handed it to Baldwin. That absolutely did not happen,” Torraco said.

Sante Fe County Sheriff Adan Mendoza said investigators used different statements in the affidavits.

“Those aren’t all inclusive of all the statements, obviously, in the investigation,” he told CNN’s “Erin Burnett OutFront.” “So there are statements that Mr. Halls either inspected or handled the firearm prior to giving it to Mr. Baldwin.”

Mendoza said that it’s important for Halls and others to cooperate with investigators and come in for follow-up interviews.

“If Mr. Halls sees what happened on the set that day different then come and explain to us how it happened,” the sheriff said.

The sheriff added that some of the people they want to speak with again have not agreed to, on advice of their attorneys.

Torraco said whether her client handed the gun to Baldwin isn’t important.

“My client didn’t load the firearm. My client didn’t point the firearm at anyone. And my client didn’t pull the trigger,” Torraco said. “The armorer comes in, the armorer opens the firearm, my client looks at it and one of the other crew members also checks it. Whether or not he handed the firearm directly to Alec Baldwin at that moment or whether the armorer handed it directly to Alec Baldwin at that moment doesn’t really matter because he didn’t load it.”

An earlier affidavit says Halls yelled, “Cold gun,” which means the firearms didn’t have live rounds, before handing the gun to Baldwin.

CNN has reached out to Torraco for comment.

Baldwin ‘extremely interested’ in future gun safety

Baldwin said this weekend he talks to the detectives every day.

“We are eagerly awaiting the Sheriff’s Department telling us what their investigation has yielded,” Baldwin told members of the paparazzi who were following him and his wife in Manchester, Vermont.

He told them he couldn’t comment on what happened because there is an ongoing investigation.

Baldwin said he couldn’t answer whether he would ever work on another film set that involved firearms like those used on the set of “Rust.”

“I do know that an ongoing effort to limit the use of firearms on film sets is something I’m extremely interested in,” Baldwin said. “But remember, something that I think is important, and that is how many bullets have been fired in films and TV shows in the last 75 years? This is America. How many bullets have gone off in movies and on TV sets … and nearly all of them without incident.”

In the case of something going wrong and in the wake of “this horrible catastrophic thing, some new measures have to take place,” he said, including the possibility of using rubber guns or plastic guns.

“That’s not for me to decide,” Baldwin stated.

No criminal charges have been filed, but the district attorney for Santa Fe County said recently she has not ruled any out.

CNN’s Steve Almasy, Amanda Watts and Lisa Respers France contributed to this report.

Read original article here

Alvin Kamara, New Orleans Saints vow it’s ‘our responsibility to do better’ after uncharacteristic loss

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — The New Orleans Saints’ offense set a new low for yardage in the Sean Payton era. And Jameis Winston posted the worst passer rating of his career while throwing his first two interceptions of the season.

But Payton and his players refused to place any blame for their dismal 26-7 loss to the Carolina Panthers on the fact that they were missing eight assistant coaches because of COVID-19 protocols — or missing nine starters because of injuries or suspensions — and have been displaced for three weeks in the wake of Hurricane Ida.

“Offensively, in particular, that’s as poor as we’ve been in a long time around here, and that starts with me,” Payton said. “We’ve gotta do a better job going in. Our protection plan wasn’t good enough. But it had nothing to do with us being short-handed with coaches or us being away or the COVID [situation].

“All of those would be excuses. They played better than us today and deserved to win the football game.”

Running back Alvin Kamara concurred after the Saints were held to 128 total yards — a stunning flop just one week after they dominated the Green Bay Packers 38-3 in the season opener.

“It wasn’t about anybody not being here. I think it was our responsibility to still come out and play without coaches being there,” Kamara said after being held to 5 rushing yards on eight carries.

“There’s no handicap. We don’t get an extra second on the play clock because we don’t have coaches; we don’t get an extra down because there’s no coaches. It is what it is. There’s still a game to play. The whole coaching staff could’ve been gone — they wasn’t gonna cancel the game. You gotta keep going. “[Now] you’ve got some adversity and you’ve gotta find a way to react and respond. It’s on us. It’s our responsibility to do better.”

The Saints were without eight assistants Sunday after they had tested positive for COVID-19 throughout the week: receivers coach Curtis Johnson, tight ends coach Dan Roushar, running backs coach Joel Thomas, defensive line coaches Ryan Nielsen and Brian Young, offensive analyst Jim Chaney, offensive assistant Declan Doyle and special teams assistant Phil Galiano. Offensive line coach Brendan Nugent missed the week of practice before being cleared to return Saturday.

The Saints also lost a whopping total of five starters because of injuries between Week 1 and Week 2 (center Erik McCoy, cornerback Marshon Lattimore, safety C.J. Gardner-Johnson, defensive end Marcus Davenport and linebacker Kwon Alexander).

And they have been training in the Dallas/Fort Worth area for more than three weeks because of power outages in the New Orleans area and other issues caused by Hurricane Ida.

But the problem that plagued them most Sunday, according to Payton and the players, was their lack of communication and lack of an effective plan for Carolina’s relentless blitzing.

According to ESPN Stats & Information research, the Panthers pressured Winston on 18 of his 28 dropbacks (64%), which was the third-highest pressure rate for any defense since ESPN began tracking pressure in 2009.

When pressured, Winston was 4-of-13 for 54 yards with two interceptions and four sacks.

“We didn’t handle the communication well enough, we didn’t handle the pressures well enough, and we didn’t coach it well enough,” Payton said. “We had seen it on tape, and obviously we got more of it and didn’t handle it well.

“So we clearly didn’t work on it well enough and effectively enough, and it kind of bit us in the butt today.”

Winston also blamed himself for not communicating well enough with the line — which is a work in progress considering former Saints quarterback Drew Brees used to handle the protections before injured center McCoy took over the lion’s share of protection calls this year.

Second-year Saints offensive lineman Cesar Ruiz (a college center) did a solid job filling in for McCoy last week after sliding over from right guard. But nothing went right for the Saints’ offense in Week 2.

Both of Winston’s interceptions were desperate heaves down the field late in the first half and late in the game, when the risks made some sense. But he didn’t use that as an excuse.

“Still gotta make good decisions,” said Winston, who completed just 11 of 22 passes for 111 yards and a passer rating of 26.9. “They came at inopportune times. I don’t want to have us in that position in the first place, but still have to take care of the football.”

The Saints will play at the New England Patriots in Week 3 before finally returning home to New Orleans to practice and host the New York Giants in Week 4.

“Just keep fighting,” Winston said of his postgame message. “We have to put this one behind us. We will get better. We will pick up our tempo. I will get better from a communication standpoint and get more efficient on first and second downs.”

Read original article here

Kathy Hochul Interview: ‘I Feel a Heavy Weight of Responsibility’

ALBANY, N.Y. — Governor Kathy C. Hochul, the first woman in history to lead New York, took the helm this week under extraordinary circumstances, as she replaced a disgraced governor and moved to confront staggering public health, educational and economic challenges across the state.

Minutes after sketching out her vision in her initial address as governor on Tuesday, Ms. Hochul — a Western New York Democrat — sat down with The New York Times at the State Capitol. In a wide-ranging interview, the relatively little-known executive discussed her governing philosophy and her plans for the state, her political leanings (“I’m a Biden Democrat”) and her ambitions for her new team (she has decided on her lieutenant governor, she said).

And she offered some of her most extensive remarks to date about how she contrasts with Andrew M. Cuomo, whom she replaced in office following his resignation.

Below are edited and condensed excerpts from the interview with Ms. Hochul, 62, whose remarkable political rise has taken her from local official to congresswoman, and now from lieutenant governor to one of the most consequential jobs in the nation.

You’re making history as the first female governor to lead New York. To what extent does that feel meaningful to you?

I feel a heavy weight of responsibility on my shoulders.

I take it very seriously, my position as first female governor. But I want at the end of my term — terms — to make sure that no woman, no girl, no teenager ever feels there’s anything they can’t do.

How should New Yorkers judge whether your tenure was a success?

Do we get stuff done? I’m direct. I have a very focused agenda. And I hold myself to the highest standards. I judge myself more harshly than any voter, or any New Yorker, will.

Judge me by specific accomplishments in terms of what I announced today and what I’ll announce in the State of the State address, and hold me accountable to those ambitions. But at the end of the day, I want people to say that I played a major role in restoring people’s confidence in the ability of state government to be on their side, to fight for them, and again — I’ll say it again — to get things done.

Are you, as governor, directing teachers statewide to get the vaccine?

I want everyone in the state of New York to get the vaccine, particularly teachers, and people who are in a school environment — or have a testing requirement, frequent testing.

However, the governor does not possess the executive powers that were in place a year ago, so I will be working hard, developing partnerships with these stakeholders who can work with me to get this done.

Governor Cuomo’s response to the pandemic was sometimes criticized for being too top-down and dismissive of public health experts’ advice. How will your approach differ from his?

I’m hard-wired to view everything that Albany does through the lens of a local town, city, county official.

That’s a shift in philosophy. I’m here, ready — I’m going to give you direction; I’ll back you up. But I also don’t want to take away powers that rest with you, because I know what that feels like.

I was in that position when Albany would be so heavy-handed. But I also think a pandemic requires a strong response. I will give strong responses. I’m decisive. And I’ll back everything I do up with consultation with people who are in the field.

What is the appropriate balance between demonstrating executive leadership and deferring to local officials?

It’s consultation with the locals, and then the buck stops with me.

Your predecessor was known to have a heavy hand with the Metropolitan Transportation Authority. How much authority are you looking to assert over the M.T.A.?

I’ve already had conversations with leadership; I’ve been briefed on our significant projects, and I want to get them done.

Authority doesn’t have to be concentrated in me when I’m hiring outstanding professionals who know their jobs. I will be there if there’s something that’s not following what I want. But I also know that day to day, they’re the ones that have to be accountable. Accountable to the riders, accountable to me. But I also know that granting more freedom allows them to rise.

You’ve been in New York politics a long time, but you’ve also been open about the fact that you did not work closely with Governor Cuomo. If you weren’t especially involved in his policymaking decisions, what do you say to people who question whether you have the managerial experience to lead the state forward?

If they have any questions about my ability to lead, speak to every single person who’s in government with me, because they know I bring up a collaborative approach to government. And I know that that is going to be a breath of fresh air. I’ve heard that from countless current employees, cabinet members, heads of agencies, heads of authorities.

Not being in every single room means I was somewhere else learning the state like no other. Nobody knows the state — no person alive knows the state the way I do. That’s because I set out to make this role, redefine it as I have every single role I’ve had. I’ve done that as lieutenant governor, and that’s why I have the breadth of knowledge, relationships and just a deep love for the state.

One thing that was probably not in your job description as lieutenant governor was publicly disagreeing with Governor Cuomo. Now that you are governor, what is one main policy difference that you had with him?

I thought we should have done more with the New York City Housing Authority. I think there’s still an opportunity. So many people are living in squalor. The heat is not reliable in the wintertime. It’s too hot in the summertime. Things are breaking down, and I want to get back to the nuts and bolts. Everybody has the dignity, even the dignity of having a good roof over their heads.

I’ve seen how transformative it is when you give people a safe home, something that so many take for granted, but if you don’t have it, it’s terrifying.

So that’s one area where I would spend more public time and effort.

Do you plan to use your influence to help Democrats expand the House majority through the redistricting process?

Yes. I am also the leader of the New York State Democratic Party. I embrace that.

I have a responsibility to lead this party, as well as the government. I’m going to be doing whatever I can to let people know that the values of the Democratic Party today are part of who I am, fighting for people that just had a tough blow dealt to them in life.

The Democratic Party has to regain its position that it once had when I was growing up. My grandparents were F.D.R. Democrats. My parents were J.F.K. Democrats.

Today, I’m a Biden Democrat.

Are you saying that because he’s the president or because you share similar worldviews?

Because it comes from a view that all of us have a moral responsibility to fight for the underdog.

That’s what I’ve done my whole life. To engage in policies, like fighting for the Affordable Care Act, which I did — which led to my demise in Congress. The core value is fighting for people, for health care, for helping them get out of this pandemic.

I’m eager to lead that party and use the power that I have to help make sure there are more Democrats there to help Joe Biden get his agenda through the Senate. I just spoke to Senator Schumer a short time ago. I talked to Joe Biden last night. Nancy Pelosi has called me a couple days ago.

So these are relationships I have, but I also take seriously my job to increase their numbers so the Democratic agenda gets through and is there to help the American people.

Have you decided whom your lieutenant governor will be? Yes or no?

[In a hushed voice, with an almost-wink] Yes.

Who?

Stay tuned.

Do you support the congestion pricing plan for New York City, and do you want to accelerate its implementation?

I’ve supported it from its inception.

I believe it has to happen for all the reasons we know congestion pricing works. But I also got to work on finding out the rollout time. I know they’re saying from 18 months to 16 months, but I want to check into that.

Do you agree with Eric Adams, the Democratic nominee for New York City mayor, that changes should be considered for the state’s bail law, and if so, what do you believe should be changed?

I’m not sure the bail law is being implemented the way it was intended.

Judges have far more discretion to ensure that people meet the standards put forth in the law so no one who’s been convicted of a violent crime is able to get out. The law spells out what’s supposed to be in place for judges to evaluate, and I’m not 100 percent sure that’s what’s happening.

So I’ve not seen evidence — and I support bail reform, support it strongly, because we’ve had an unjust system. Same crime, two people. One’s rich, one’s poor. One’s going to jail, one is staying at home. I’ve said for years how un-American that is.

We also have a responsibility to protect our citizens and protect our communities, so I’m willing to look at that.

Governor Cuomo said that the attorney general’s report was unfair and politically motivated. Do you think he had adequate due process?

I had full confidence, from the very beginning, in the attorney general’s report. I have confidence in the conclusion and the results.

Do you think you’d beat him in a primary next year?

I have a very good record of winning elections, especially the ones that people tell me I can’t win.

You’ve spoken with a lot of national leaders in recent weeks, including Hillary Clinton. What advice did she give you?

“Stay strong.”

She was so gracious in offering to be there as a sounding board, talk whenever I wanted to.

I’ll never forget, when I won my special election in Congress, I got my head kicked in.

So after that, I’m battle-scarred. Hillary has been through the same. There aren’t many people who’ve been in those trenches. It creates a special bond.

That’s what I talked about with Hillary — changing people’s images of women in executive positions. And that’s what I want to do.

Read original article here

Malta’s government must bear responsibility for journalist’s assassination, inquiry finds

Caruana Galizia, a leading Maltese anti-corruption journalist, was killed in October 2018 when a bomb in her rented car was detonated by a remote-controlled device on a country lane near her home.

Her family had long argued she was assassinated because of her work uncovering alleged corruption in Malta’s government, and her death sparked a political crisis in the southern European country. Vincent Muscat, one of the three suspects accused of her murder, pleaded guilty in February.

Prime Minister Robert Abela published the findings of the inquiry, which began in December 2019, on Thursday.

At a news conference, he said the board “unequivocally confirms that the state was not directly involved in the assassination. However, it also states the state must shoulder the responsibility for serious shortcomings especially related to governance and the protection of journalists.”

The public inquiry, conducted by one active and two retired judges, found “the State must bear responsibility for the assassination because it created an atmosphere of impunity generated from the highest levels in the heart of the administration within the Office of the Prime Minister that like an octopus spread to other entities, such as regulatory institutions and the police, leading to the collapse of the rule of law,” according to a news release from the Daphne Caruana Galizia Foundation and the lawyers representing Caruana Galizia’s family.

It added the state did not “recognise as they should have the real and immediate risks, including from the criminal intent of third parties, to Daphne Caruana Galizia’s life,” and failed to take reasonable steps to avoid the threat.

Abela said he felt “duty bound to apologise to the family of the late Mrs Daphne Caruana Galizia and all those who feel aggrieved by this dark episode in our nation’s history.”

Caruana Galizia’s murder was met with anger across the continent and prompted a long-running scandal that claimed the career of Abela’s predecessor as prime minister, Joseph Muscat, who resigned in January 2020 but has always denied any wrongdoing or involvement in the journalist’s death. The former leader is no relation to Vincent Muscat.

Abela said in a tweet Thursday that the report “merits mature analysis beyond partisan arguments. Lessons must be drawn and the reforms must continue with greater resolve.”

Caruana Galizia family’s said in a statement that the inquiry’s findings “confirm the conviction our family held from the moment Daphne was assassinated: that her assassination was a direct result of the collapse of the rule of law and the impunity that the State provided to the corrupt network she was reporting on.”

The family said it hopes the findings will lead to the “restoration of the rule of law in Malta, effective protection for journalists, and an end to the impunity that the corrupt officials Daphne investigated continue to enjoy. Daphne and her work will live on in ensuring that the recommendations of this Inquiry effect lasting change.”

Joseph Muscat said in a statement Thursday: “It is to be noted that the Inquiry found that the State had no prior knowledge of, or was involved in the assassination. The report also unequivocally states that I was in no way implicated in the murder.”

However, despite his “very serious reservations on the shortcomings of the Inquiry,” Muscat added: “I accept the said conclusions as I have always done in the past out of respect for the Institutions.”

“As I said when I announced I would be stepping down from Prime Minister, I was doing so to shoulder responsibilities which were mine and also those which were not, including those mentioned in this Inquiry. I paid the ultimate political price for this,” he added.

The Daphne Caruana Galizia Foundation said in a statement: “This report is a landmark in the campaign to ensure that the Maltese State is held accountable for its positive obligation to protect journalists. We call on the Government to accept the recommendations of the Inquiry and to publish its plan of action without delay.

“This is a historic opportunity to ensure real change for the safety of journalists and to a process of national healing following the traumatic assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia on 16 October 2017,” they added.

Read original article here

Baghdad bombing: ISIS claims responsibility for explosion on the eve of Eid that killed dozens

Children and women were among the dead and wounded, according to health and security officials. The blast took place in the Wahailat outdoor market in Sadr City, a predominantly Muslim Shia neighborhood in the east of Baghdad.

Police officials said a number of shops and stores were also damaged in the blast.

The market, like many other public places, had been packed with shoppers preparing to celebrate an Islamic religious festival, Eid al-Adha. Videos published on social media show women holding their babies and screaming as they flee the scene.

ISIS claimed responsibility hours after the blast happened, saying in a statement that it had been carried out by a suicide bomber wearing an explosive vest. The terror group provided no evidence to support the claim.

In a statement on Monday, the Iraqi military said the explosion was caused by an improvised explosive device (IED). However, two police officers said they have yet to determine the cause of the blast, as the investigation is still underway.

Ali Yassin, a resident in Sadr City, said he has lost hope that Iraq will be a safe place for his four children to grow up.

“Not a day goes by in Iraq without a tragic incident,” Yassin told CNN. “Why can’t we live like the rest of the countries? Why can’t we enjoy peace like the rest of the world?”

“If I am financially capable, I would leave Iraq along with my family at once,” Yassin added.

Top Iraqi government officials, including the Iraqi President and Iraqi Prime Minister, condemned the “terrorist attack” and vowed to bring perpetrators to justice.

“We will not be calm unless we uproot the hateful and cowardly terrorism, and it is certain that the will of the Iraqis is beyond their criminality and villainy,” President Barham Salih said in a statement released by his office on Monday.

Col. Wayne Marotto, the military spokesperson for Operation Inherent Resolve, the global coalition to defeat what remains of the ISIS caliphate, offered its condolences for the victims’ families in a tweet on Monday.

“This horrific attack right before Eid Al-Adha is a terrible reminder of the violence Iraqi children continue to face,” said Sheema Sen Gupta, the UNICEF Representative in Iraq, in a statement on Monday.

“On the eve of Eid Al-Adha and as Iraqis mourn this sad moment, UNICEF calls for all actors in Iraq to work together towards a safer Iraq where children do not have to live in fear and where they enjoy their very basic activities and rights,” Gupta said.

Read original article here

Bennett to opposition: Show ‘national responsibility’ on Citizenship Law

Prime Minister Naftali Bennett called on the opposition to vote in favor of the Citizenship Law, saying that “playing” with the security of the country was a “redline” and called on the opposition parties to put national responsibility ahead of politics. 

Speaking at a Yamina faction meeting Monday afternoon, Bennett said that the state needed to control who enters the country and who gets citizenship, and asserted that opposition leader Benjamin Netanyahu was well aware of a Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) assessment that failure to pass the law would harm Israeli security. 

Interior Minister Ayelet Shaked who is leading the negotiations within the coalition said at the same meeting that as yet there was still no majority for the law but said she “hoped and believed” that a majority would be achieved when the law comes to a vote in the plenum Monday night. 

Netanyahu rejected Bennett’s call, accusing him of having “cooked up a porridge” of a government with left-wing Meretz and the Arab Ra’am Party, and said it was Bennett’s responsibility if he could not pass the Citizenship Law. 

After the contentious Citizenship Law failed to pass the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee on Monday morning, opposition members will meet soon to decide how they will vote when the law reaches the Knesset plenum later today.

Foreign Minister and Alternate Prime Minister Yair Lapid (Yesh Atid) said however they vote, the coalition will not fall apart. However, he warned that not passing the law could increase terrorism in Israel. 

Coalition partners Ra’am and Meretz oppose the law, a temporary measure first passed in 2003 which stops Palestinians who marry Israelis from obtaining Israeli citizenship on security grounds, and have promised to vote against it, denying the government a majority in the plenum. 

Last week Meretz MK and Regional Cooperation Minister Esawi Frej proposed to extend the law by just six months instead of a year and convene a ministerial committee to find a solution to humanitarian issues arising from the law. 

The suggestion appeared to have foundered but reports in the Hebrew media suggest that Shaked is now considering the compromise with the law is set to expire on Tuesday. 

The opposition have denounced the coalition for its failure to pass the law due to the presence of Ra’am and Meretz in the government.Religious Zionist Party head Betzalel Smotrich said his party would vote against the law, citing the government’s siding with “anti-Zionist and post-Zionist parties.””This government is galloping into the abyss, threatening to smash the State of Israel with it, and asking us to be a spare wheel that will allow them to continue galloping into the abyss,” Smotrich said at a faction meeting. “We will not give in to this”

Head of the opposition and Likud leader Benjamin Netanyahu has demanded that the Citizenship Law be passed as a two month measure during which time the Likud’s stringent immigration law which would permanently deny family reunification to Palestinians marrying Israelis would be legislated. 

The coalition has rejected this offer. 

Netanyahu has not yet stated how the Likud will vote, with some murmurings of discontent against his stance coming from Likud MK Avi Dichter who has said the law must be approved on national security grounds. 

Smotrich denounced the coalition over its failure to pass the Citizenship Law on Monday morning, alleging that they had formed “a dangerous government with a post-Zionist Left and anti-Zionist terrorism supporters” and yet will not negotiate with the opposition to pass its immigration law.

“The temporary law is full of holes and bad, and we have no interest in passing it just so the coalition will survive,” said Smotrich. 



Read original article here

France Has ‘Overwhelming’ Responsibility for Rwanda Genocide, Report Says

PARIS — Blinded by its fears of losing influence in Africa and by a colonial view of the continent’s people, France remained close to the “racist, corrupt and violent regime’’ responsible for the 1994 genocide in Rwanda, and bears “serious and overwhelming” responsibilities, according to a report released Friday.

But the report — commissioned by President Emmanuel Macron in 2019 and put together by 15 historians with unprecedented access to French government archives — cleared France of complicity in the genocide that led to the deaths of 800,000 ethnic Tutsis and contributed to decades of conflicts and instability in Central Africa.

“Is France an accomplice to the genocide of the Tutsi? If by this we mean a willingness to join a genocidal operation, nothing in the archives that were examined demonstrates this,’’ said the report, which was presented to Mr. Macron on Friday afternoon.

But the commission said that France had long been involved with Rwanda’s Hutu-led government even as that government prepared the genocide of the Tutsis, regarding the country’s leadership as a crucial ally in a French sphere of influence in the region.

For decades, France’s actions during the genocide have been the source of intense debate in Africa and in Europe, with critics accusing France of not having done enough to prevent the killings or of having actively supported the Hutu-led government behind the genocide. The unresolved history has long poisoned relations between France and the government of President Paul Kagame, the Tutsi leader who has controlled Rwanda for nearly a quarter century.

Mr. Macron, who has spoken of his desire to reset France’s relations with a continent where it was a colonial power, is believed to have commissioned the report to try to improve relations with Rwanda.

Though the 992-page report presents fresh information from the French government archives, it is unlikely to resolve the debate over France’s role during the genocide, said Filip Reyntjens, a Belgian expert on the genocide.

“This will not be good enough for one side, and it won’t be good enough for the other side,’’ Mr. Reyntjens said. “So my guess is that this will not settle the issue.’’

According to the report, François Mitterrand, the French president at the time, maintained a “strong, personal and direct relationship’’ with Juvenal Habyarimana, the longtime Hutu president of Rwanda, despite his “racist, corrupt and violent regime.’’

Mr. Mitterrand and members of his inner circle believed that Mr. Habyarimana and the Hutus were key allies in a French-speaking bloc that also included Burundi and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, known then as Zaire.

The French saw Mr. Kagame and other Tutsi leaders — who had spent years in exile in neighboring Anglophone Uganda — as allies in an American push into the region.

“The principal interest of this country for France is that it be francophone,’’ a high-ranking military official wrote in 1990, according to the report, which concluded: “France’s interpretation of the Rwandan situation can be viewed through the prism of defending la Francophonie.’’

French leaders at the time viewed the Hutus and Tutsis through a colonial lens, ascribing to each group stereotypical physical traits and behavior, compounding their misinterpretation of the events that led to the genocide, according to the report.

In one of the report’s most damning conclusions, its authors wrote, “The failure of France in Rwanda, the causes of which are not all its own, can be likened in this respect to a final imperial defeat, all the more significant because it was neither expressed nor acknowledged.’’

Read original article here

‘business needs to take responsibility for more than just its own narrow self interest’

TipRanks

2 “Strong Buy” Dividend Stocks Yielding at Least 7%

A number of factors are coming together in the market picture, and indicate a possible change in conditions in the mid-term. These include increases in commodity prices, specifically, oil prices, which have rallied recently. In addition, the January jobs numbers, released earlier this month, were disappointing at best – and grim, at worst. They, do, however, increase the chance that President Biden and the Democratic Congress will push a large-scale COVID relief package through to fruition. These factors are likely to pull in varying directions. The rise in oil prices suggests an upcoming squeeze in supply, while the possibility of further stimulus cash bodes well for fans of market liquidity. These developments, however, point toward a possible price reflationary climate. Against this backdrop, some investors are looking for ways to rebuild and defend their portfolios. And that will bring us to dividends. By providing a steady income stream, no matter what the market conditions, a reliable dividend stock provides a pad for your investment portfolio when the share stop appreciating. And so, we’ve opened up the TipRanks database and pulled the details on two stocks with high yields – at least 7%. Even better, these stocks are seen as Strong Buys by Wall Street’s analysts. Let’s find out why. Williams Companies (WMB) The first stock we’ll look at is Williams Companies, a natural gas processing firm based in Oklahoma. Williams controls pipelines for natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil gathering, in a network stretching from the Pacific Northwest, through the Rockies to the Gulf Coast, and across the South to the Mid-Atlantic. Williams’ core business is the processing and transport of natural gas, with crude oil and energy generation as secondary operations. The company’s footprint is huge – it handles almost one-third of all natural gas use in the US, both residential and commercial. Williams will report its 4Q20 results late this month – but a look at the Q3 results is informative. The company reported $1.93 billion at the top line, down 3.5% year-over-year but up 8.4% quarter-over-quarter, and the highest quarterly revenue so far released for 2020. Net earnings came in at 25 cents per share, flat from Q2 but up 38% year-over-year. The report was widely held as meeting or exceeding expectations, and the stock gained 7% in the two weeks after it was released. In a move that may indicate a solid Q4 earnings on the way, the company declared its next dividend, to be paid out on March 29. The 41-cent per common share payment is up 2.5% from the previous quarter, and annualizes to $1.64. At that rate, the dividend yields 7.1%. Williams has a 4-year history of dividend growth and maintenance, and typically raises the payment in the first quarter of the year. Covering the stock for RBC, 5-star analyst TJ Schultz wrote: “We believe Williams can hit the low-end of its 2020 EBITDA guidance. While we expect near-term growth in the NE to moderate, we think WMB should benefit from less than previously expected associated gas from the Permian. Given our long-term view, we estimate Williams can remain comfortably within investment grade credit metrics through our forecast period and keep the dividend intact.” To this end, Schultz rates WMB an Outperform (i.e. Buy), and his $26 price target suggests an upside of 13% in the next 12 months. (To watch Schultz’s track record, click here) With 8 recent reviews on record, including 7 Buys and just 1 Hold, WMB has earned its Strong Buy analyst consensus rating. While the stock has gained in recent months, reaching $23, the average price target of $25.71 implies it still has room for ~12% growth this year. (See WMB stock analysis on TipRanks) AGNC Investment (AGNC) Next up is AGNC Investment, a real estate investment trust. It’s no surprise to find a REIT as a dividend champ – these companies are required by tax codes to return a high percentage of profits directly to shareholders, and frequently use dividends as the vehicle for compliance. AGNC, based in Maryland, focuses on MBSs (mortgage-backed securities) with backing and guarantees from the US government. These securities make up some two-thirds of the company’s total portfolio, or $65.1 billion out of the $97.9 billion total. AGNC’s most recent quarterly returns, for 4Q20, showed $459 million in net revenue, and a net income per share of $1.37. While down yoy, the EPS was the strongest recorded for 2020. For the full year, AGNC reported $1.68 billion in total revenues, and $1.56 per share paid out in dividends. The current dividend, 12 cents per common share paid out monthly, will annualize to $1.44; the difference from last year’s higher annualization rate is due to a dividend cut implemented in April in response to the coronavirus crisis. At the current rate, the dividend gives investors a robust yield of 8.8%, and is easily affordable for the company given current income. Among AGNC’s bulls is Maxim analyst Michael Diana who wrote: “AGNC has retained a competitive yield on book value relative to other mortgage REITs (mREITS), even as it has out-earned its dividend and repurchased shares. While turmoil in the mortgage markets at the end of March resulted in losses and lower book values for all mortgage REITs, AGNC was able to meet all of its margin calls and, importantly, take relatively fewer realized losses and therefore retain more earnings power post-turmoil.” Based on all of the above, Diana rates AGNC a Buy, along with an $18 price target. This figure implies a ~10% upside potential from current levels. (To watch Diana’s track record, click here) Wall Street is on the same page. Over the last couple of months, AGNC has received 7 Buys and a single Hold — all add up to a Strong Buy consensus rating. However, the $16.69 average price target suggests shares will remain range bound for the foreseeable future. (See AGNC stock analysis on TipRanks) To find good ideas for dividend stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks’ Best Stocks to Buy, a newly launched tool that unites all of TipRanks’ equity insights. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the featured analysts. The content is intended to be used for informational purposes only. It is very important to do your own analysis before making any investment.

Read original article here