Tag Archives: require

L.A. County will require masks indoors amid COVID-19 surge

Just a month ago, Los Angeles County and the rest of California celebrated a long-awaited reopening, marking the tremendous progress made in the battle against COVID-19 by lifting virtually all restrictions on businesses and other public spaces. Now, the coronavirus is resurgent, and the nation’s most-populous county is scrambling to beat back the pandemic’s latest charge.

Starting Saturday night, residents will again be required to wear masks in indoor public spaces, regardless of their vaccination status.

The latest order not only puts the county further at odds with both the California Department of Public Health and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — both of which continue to maintain that vaccinated people need not cover their faces indoors — but puts officials in the precarious position of asking the inoculated to forfeit one of the benefits recently enjoyed.

“This is an all-hands-on-deck moment,” said Dr. Muntu Davis, the county’s health officer.

Vaccinated people are, in essence, being asked to make a sacrifice to help slow coronavirus spread among the unvaccinated. Officials have stressed that those who have been inoculated have an excellent chance of being protected, even from the easily spread Delta variant, believed to be twice as transmissible as the conventional coronavirus strains. Between Dec. 7 to June 7, the unvaccinated accounted for 99.6% of L.A. County’s coronavirus cases, 98.7% of COVID-19 hospitalizations and 99.8% of deaths.

The new order, which comes a little more than two weeks after the county recommended the same protocols as a precaution, will go into effect at 11:59 p.m. Saturday — and Davis said it will be similar to the masking requirements that were in place before the June 15 reopening.

“We’re not where we need to be for the millions at risk of infection here in Los Angeles County, and waiting to do something will be too late given what we’re seeing now,” he told reporters Thursday.

The order will continue to allow indoor restaurant dining, although people will need to keep their masks on when they’re not eating or drinking.

Long Beach, which has its own independent health department, will align with L.A. County’s health order. The other city in L.A. County with its own health department, Pasadena, already recommends everyone, even the fully vaccinated, wear masks in indoor public settings, and the city is “reviewing options for a mandate,” according to a spokeswoman.

UC San Francisco on Thursday also ordered a mandatory indoor masking policy everywhere on campus, effective immediately.

“As health leaders of the communities in which we live and work, we have the special responsibility to practice sound COVID-19 hygiene as we serve all those who rely on us,” wrote Dr. Josh Adler, UCSF Health’s chief clinical officer, in a memo.

L.A. County’s rise in community transmission has accelerated dramatically since California fully reopened on June 15. For the weeklong period that ended that day, L.A. County averaged 173 new coronavirus cases a day. For the seven-day period that ended Wednesday, the county’s average was 1,077 new cases a day. On Thursday, Davis reported 1,537 additional cases.

Countywide, COVID-19 hospitalizations increased over that same time frame — from 223 on June 15 to 452 as of Wednesday. Still, cases and hospitalizations are still more than 93% below what they were at the peak of the winter surge. And deaths remain at historically low levels, at an average of about seven a day.

While officials don’t expect hospitals to ever be as stressed as they were during the winter surge, it’s still possible the healthcare system could be significantly affected if trends continue.

“There is still time to take action and protect people through vaccination, since we are starting from a lower baseline rate,” Dr. Roger Lewis, who directed COVID-19 hospital demand modeling for the L.A. County Department of Health Services, wrote in an email. “It is critically important that everyone eligible for vaccination who has not already been vaccinated does so as quickly as possible.”

An uptick in cases, combined with the presence of the highly infectious Delta variant of the coronavirus, was behind L.A. County’s urging in late June that all residents wear masks in public indoor spaces.

Cases have increased rapidly since then, and county health officials now believe more direct intervention is needed.

Davis said he expects the new order will remain “in place until we begin to see improvements” in community transmission.

He characterized universal indoor masking as one of the more effective ways to curb the spread without interrupting operations at businesses and venues.

But, he acknowledged, further intervention could be necessary if conditions deteriorate.

“Anything is on the table if things continue to get worse, which is why we want to take action now,” he said.

The vaccines are also believed to be essentially as effective against the Delta variant as other variants. During June, 86% of people diagnosed with the Delta variant in L.A. County were not fully vaccinated — in the same range as the Alpha variant, where 91% of people diagnosed were not fully vaccinated; the Gamma variant, 92%; and all other variants, 89%.

But officials suspect that unvaccinated people have stopped wearing masks in indoor public settings and businesses, even though they’re still required to do so.

The new mask order, Davis said, “really is about making this a universal practice. It’s the easiest thing to do in terms of ensuring that we’re all protected, regardless of the risks that we have.”

Still, the renewed restrictions in L.A. County are undoubtedly a blow to some eager to put COVID-19 in the rearview mirror.

“I’m not nervous about the mask mandate again,” said Kali Mashayeki, a California-native and Penn State student. “I’m nervous that this means cases are going up again.”

Mashayeki said the new order feels like “walking backwards,” but it puts her at ease knowing that the intent is to protect everyone.“I’m vaccinated now, so I’m not worried,” she said. “But we need to do it for the safety of everyone.”

Elizabeth Diaz, a fourth-grade elementary school teacher in Hawthorne, said she’s continued to wear her mask indoors, even when restrictions were eased. “It’s for our safety,” she said.

But one woman who declined to give her name said she felt that the mandate was overprotective. “It’s not selfish,” she said. “Do I like it? No, I don’t. But no one likes to have their face covered.”

Hilda Solis, chairwoman of the county Board of Supervisors, said she hoped this was only “a temporary action, until we can lower our cases and continue getting more people the doses they need.”

With similar increases across the state, other counties are also urging residents to take additional precautions. This week, health officials in Sacramento and Yolo counties issued voluntary calls for all their residents to wear masks in indoor public settings.

Statewide guidance on face coverings remains unchanged, according to the California Department of Public Health. However, the department “supports local health departments, like Los Angeles County, making stricter policies based on the conditions in their community.”

“Vaccines remain the best protection against COVID-19, including the highly infectious Delta variant,” officials wrote in a statement to The Times. “We urge all eligible to get vaccinated, as it is the most important thing we can do to stop the spread of the virus.”

Already, cases are ballooning across California.

Orange, San Diego and San Bernardino counties have all had their daily case averages more than double since late June, and the state’s latest weekly average of 2,980 new coronavirus cases per day is up 175% from two weeks ago.

The CDC now considers L.A., San Bernardino, San Diego, Riverside and Imperial counties to have “substantial” community transmission — the second-worst classification on the agency’s four-tier scale — as all recently recorded seven-day case rates that were over 50 per 100,000 residents.

California as a whole is still categorized as having “moderate” community transmission, the second-lowest tier.

Despite increasingly urgent calls to get vaccinated as cases rise, California’s inoculation pace continues to tail off.

Over the last seven days, providers throughout California have administered an average of just over 56,000 doses per day, Times’ data show. Though that figure could rise as more reports come in, it won’t be anywhere near the high of the rollout, when hundreds of thousands of shots were going into Californians’ arms each day.

Only 52% of all L.A. County residents are fully vaccinated, while nearly 60% have received at least one shot. Some experts think it would take 70% to 85% of all residents to be vaccinated to achieve “herd immunity” against the coronavirus — when the sustained transmission of the virus is interrupted.

Health officials say there are many reasons a person may be unvaccinated.

Some may still be too young to receive the shots, or have an underlying health condition that prevents them from doing so. Others may be wary of potential side effects, or unable to get the time off work.

Another common sticking point is that all three available vaccines have been authorized only for emergency use at this point, and haven’t yet received full approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

But there’s undoubtedly a segment of the population that’s steadfastly opposed to getting inoculated — either for personal or political reasons, or because they’ve come to believe some of the vaccine disinformation that’s spread widely on social media.

Experts say it is possible to persuade a significant number of people to get the vaccine who had been hesitant about getting a shot. About one in five adults say they’re now vaccinated after being previously reluctant to get the shot, according to a survey by the Kaiser Family Foundation, and many of them said that conversations with family, friends and doctors helped.

window.fbAsyncInit = function() { FB.init({

appId : '134435029966155',

xfbml : true, version : 'v2.9' }); };

(function(d, s, id){ var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) {return;} js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Read original article here

2 unvaccinated Covid patients require lung transplant, partial lung removal

The families of two unvaccinated men who underwent major lung surgery after they contracted the coronavirus are encouraging others to get the shots and re-evaluating their own vaccine hesitancy.

A 24-year-old Georgia man who was hesitant about getting vaccinated against Covid-19 underwent a double lung transplant after months in the hospital battling the virus. His mother urges people to protect themselves and get the shots.

“I just don’t want anyone else to go through this. It’s horrific,” the woman, Cheryl Bargatze Nuclo, told NBC affiliate WXIA of Atlanta. “It’s not worth all the pain it’s going to cause you and your family.”

Blake Bargatze, Nuclo’s son, has been hospitalized since April after he contracted the coronavirus at an indoor concert in Florida. She told WXIA that days before the show, she had talked with him about getting vaccinated.

“He wanted to wait until it was out for, like, 10 years or so, kind of like a lot of the population wants it to be out longer,” she said.

After he attended the concert, Bargatze got sick and was taken to a hospital in Florida. As his situation became dire, the family had him transferred to Piedmont Hospital in Atlanta so he could be placed on an ECMO machine. The device pumps and oxygenates a person’s blood outside the body, giving the lungs and the heart a chance to rest.

Nuclo said the machine wasn’t enough to help her son recover, so he was moved to the University of Maryland Medical Center in Baltimore, where he was placed on the lung transplant list. She told WXIA that her son was in such bad shape that he was moved to the top of the list.

In June, he underwent a double lung transplant.

“He wanted the chance, he wanted to live, so we did whatever we could to have that happen for him,” she told the station.

Nuclo and her husband couldn’t immediately be reached for comment Thursday.

Days before the surgery, Bargatze got a Covid vaccination. His brother and a cousin also got the shots after they saw what he has gone through, Nuclo told WXIA.

A family in Ohio is going through a similar situation. Janelle Janatowski of Toledo said her 25-year-old son has been hospitalized for three months after he contracted the coronavirus at work.

Over the past several months, her son, Marcus Hartford, has undergone three operations, one of them to remove part of his right lung, Janatowski said in a phone interview Thursday. After having spent 81 days on an ECMO machine, he was finally removed from it on Tuesday.

Hartford remains on a ventilator and may have to undergo a double lung transplant if his left lung isn’t able to do the work of the right one.

Over the past several months, Marcus Hartford has undergone three operations, one of them to remove part of his right lung.Courtesy Janelle Janatowski

“He’s finally moving his arms more, and he did some leg squats. They have a bed … and they put the patient on there, and it slides up and down, and they can help him do squats to get his legs stronger so he is able to stand and eventually walk again,” she said.

“He had a very long road, but he’s hanging in there,” she said.

Hartford got sick at the beginning of April after a group of people held a birthday party at the restaurant he was working at, Janatowski said.

She said her son, an award-winning executive chef in Ohio, was recruited to help the restaurant reopen after it had been closed for months because of the pandemic. He had been on the job for only about three months when he got sick.

“He just happened to be the one that got it really bad,” she said, noting that he had no previous medical conditions and didn’t drink or smoke.

“I still feel like this is surreal,” she said, “like I’m living in a dream.”

Janatowski said her son hadn’t discussed getting vaccinated because his age group had become eligible only about a week before he got the virus.

Janatowski, who battled the virus herself after she got it from her son, said that she was initially hesitant about getting the shots but that she is reconsidering. Family members and close friends have also decided to get vaccinated.

Health officials across the country have been warning that young, unvaccinated people are being hospitalized for Covid-19 — and at times admitted to intensive care — at alarming rates.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, slightly fewer than half of people in the U.S. ages 18 to 24 and 25 to 39 are fully vaccinated. The number is even lower for children 12 to 18.

Many officials are urging young people to get vaccinated as soon as they can.

Read original article here

Iowa State Fair will now require food vendors to use credit, debit payment systems

You may need less cash at the Iowa State Fair next month. The fair is requiring all food and drink vendors to take credit and debit cards this year. The fair says it’s all about making it easier for fairgoers to buy their favorites foods. This was supposed to take effect during last year’s fair, which was canceled due to the pandemic.“We’re embracing technology and give people the opportunity…so many people today don’t carry cash,” said Gary Slater, fair general manager.Slater said they’ve been experimenting with a credit card system for the past few years. It turns out customers seem to love the idea. So now all food and beverage vendors must provide a credit card or debit card payment option. At least one vendor says it’s a no-brainer. “Actually, it’s worked really well. My employees love it,” said Connie Boesen, a long-time fair vendor. Boesen operates the Applishus stands at the fairgrounds. She began using the credit card system several years ago. She says customers can get faster service and her business can get more sales data.“It shows how much we sold. I never knew, it was kind of a guessing game on how much slush I sold, how many sliced apples, how many egg rolls. So at the end of the day, I get a printout of the items that I sold so I know it helps project out what you’re going to need,” Boesen said.The fair said cash is still welcome but expects fewer visitors to use it, which may help the bottom line. And I think the vendors will see that people will probably spend more money on a credit card. I know I do,” Slater said. He also says the fair collects 19.5% of vendor food sales and 25% for alcohol sales. The credit card system will also make it easier to keep track of those numbers.

You may need less cash at the Iowa State Fair next month. The fair is requiring all food and drink vendors to take credit and debit cards this year.

The fair says it’s all about making it easier for fairgoers to buy their favorites foods.
This was supposed to take effect during last year’s fair, which was canceled due to the pandemic.

“We’re embracing technology and give people the opportunity…so many people today don’t carry cash,” said Gary Slater, fair general manager.

Slater said they’ve been experimenting with a credit card system for the past few years. It turns out customers seem to love the idea. So now all food and beverage vendors must provide a credit card or debit card payment option. At least one vendor says it’s a no-brainer.

“Actually, it’s worked really well. My employees love it,” said Connie Boesen, a long-time fair vendor.

Boesen operates the Applishus stands at the fairgrounds. She began using the credit card system several years ago. She says customers can get faster service and her business can get more sales data.

“It shows how much we sold. I never knew, it was kind of a guessing game on how much slush I sold, how many sliced apples, how many egg rolls. So at the end of the day, I get a printout of the items that I sold so I know it helps project out what you’re going to need,” Boesen said.

The fair said cash is still welcome but expects fewer visitors to use it, which may help the bottom line.

And I think the vendors will see that people will probably spend more money on a credit card. I know I do,” Slater said.

He also says the fair collects 19.5% of vendor food sales and 25% for alcohol sales. The credit card system will also make it easier to keep track of those numbers.

Read original article here

Eek! The Physical Copy Of Monster Hunter Stories 2 Might Require A Download

© Capcom

Here’s some news that physical collectors will find quite concerning – the retail version of Monster Hunter Stories 2: Wings of Ruin could potentially require a download. And it may be more than just a day-one patch.

According to Nintendo Everything, photos it has received of the North American game’s box (from a retail worker) seem to indicate a download will be required in order to play the hard copy of the game. On the front, it says “download required” and on the back, it’s mentioned how the game requires a download of at least 15GB. The eShop file size listing is 13.5GB.

While storage requirements aren’t necessarily a problem – especially if you own a MicroSD card, there’s still the issue of the physical copy not featuring the entire game on it, which some might feel defeats the purpose of purchasing a hard copy in the first place.

Capcom has made no mention of the game requiring a download of this size previously and there’s no reference of it elsewhere, so with any luck this is just a misprint. If we hear anything else, we’ll update this post.



Read original article here

Why you should wear a face mask even if your state doesn’t require it

“We are not out of the woods. We haven’t reached the end of the pandemic,” said CNN medical analyst Dr. Leana Wen. “It’s counterproductive and truly infuriating these governors are treating this as if the pandemic is over. It’s not true.”

“We could be at the precipice of a fourth surge, and we have a way to prevent it and that’s keeping up our precautions for a while longer,” she said.

Here are five reasons why experts say you should wear a face mask, even if your state doesn’t require it:

Masks save lives

The science is clear: Wearing face masks saves lives.

Numerous studies have shown that masks are the single most effective way to protect yourself and others from contracting the coronavirus, which causes Covid-19.

In counties that require masks, Covid-19 case and death rates slow down, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Mask mandates were associated with a 0.7 percentage point decrease in daily rates of Covid-19 deaths up to 20 days after implementation and decreases of up to 1.9 percentage points up to 100 days later, according to new research published Friday by the CDC.

“Masks are a two-way street. Masks protect you and me” by preventing the spread of droplets and aerosol that may contain the virus, the CDC says in its mask guidance.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nation’s top infectious disease expert, has even started wearing two masks.

“There are many people who take the commonsense approach,” he told CNN. “If you’re talking about a physical barrier — and as the CDC recommends you want at least two layers within the mask as a physical barrier — and you feel maybe more of a physical barrier would be better, there’s nothing wrong with people wearing two masks. I often, myself, wear two masks.”

The CDC last week released new data suggesting that double masking can significantly improve protection.

Layering a cloth mask over a medical procedural mask, such as a disposable blue surgical mask, can block 92.5% of potentially infectious particles from escaping by creating a tighter fit and eliminating leakage, researchers said.

Masks can help protect pandemic gains

The United States has made a lot of progress in the fight against Covid-19, including the development of safety protocols, enhanced treatment plans and vaccines.

The rates of infections, hospitalizations and deaths have decreased in many states since January, and nearly 90 million doses of vaccines have already been administered.

But abandoning face masks now could reverse those gains, health experts warn.

With tens of thousands of Americans still being infected daily, and more transmissible variants discovered, it’s more important than ever to wear face masks and follow other safety guidelines.
“Please hear me clearly: At this level of cases with variants spreading, we stand to completely lose the hard-earned ground we have gained,” said Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the CDC.

“I am really worried about reports that more states are rolling back the exact public health measures we have recommended to protect people from Covid-19,” she said. “Please stay strong in your conviction. Continue wearing your well-fitting mask and taking the other public health prevention actions that we know work.”

Masks safeguard even the vaccinated

Health experts say that vaccinated people should continue wearing face masks, for their protection and the safety of others.

None of the three authorized vaccines — Pfizer-BioNtech, Moderna or Johnson & Johnson — are 100% effective. Continuing to wear a face mask after receiving a vaccine could provide additional personal protection.

It could also help stop the spread of Covid-19. That’s because the vaccines are effective at preventing symptomatic illness and severe disease. But it’s not clear they prevent people from becoming asymptomatic carriers and spreading it to others.

Wen said Americans will need to continue wearing masks until we reach herd immunity.

“It’s estimated that about 70% of Americans must be vaccinated before we get to herd immunity through vaccination. That’s the point where enough people have the immune protection that the virus won’t spread anymore,” she said. “This means about 230 million Americans must receive the vaccine.”

Masks are a sign of respect

In states without mask mandates, people who wear them can feel out of place.

They should continue wearing them anyway, health officials say, not as a political statement, but as a sign of respect to vulnerable community members.

Many people, including seniors and the immunocompromised, face a much higher risk of severe illness and even death from Covid-19. Wearing a mask shows that you care about their well-being.
“This is not about politics,” Wen said in July. “This is about each of us showing that we care about one another, that we respect one another.”

Dr. Joshua Barocas, an infectious diseases physician at Boston Medical Center, echoed her sentiment.

“I think beyond simply the viral transmission, wearing a mask can just be a symbol,” he said. “It can show people that you are committed to the cause, that you’re committed to fighting Covid-19 as a community…committed to protecting other people’s lives and their children’s lives and their families’ lives…committed to having a strong economy open when we’re fully ready.”

Masks will help the US return to normal

The pandemic has cut people off from family, friends, work, school, religious services and more.

Refusing to wear a mask won’t bring any of that back. All it does is further delay our return to normalcy and make life a lot more dangerous, experts say.

“People say, ‘When is it going to get back to normal and I don’t have to wear my mask anymore?'” Wen said. “That’s not the right way to think about this. We want our businesses to come back, we want our churches to be open for in-person service and our schools open for in-person learning. We need masks to do that.”

Wen said it all begins with our mindset. The faster we realize that masks don’t limit, but enable, us to return to normal, the quicker we’ll get there.

She said mask wearers and non-wearers ultimately want the same thing: for the country to return to normal.

“We are so close to the finish line, and that’s the most tragic part of it all. If you just hang in there for a bit longer, we’ll put an end to this pandemic,” she said.

CNN’s Theresa Waldrop contributed to this report.

Read original article here

Engineers Have Proposed The First Model For a Physically Possible Warp Drive

The idea of a warp drive taking us across large areas of space faster than the speed of light has long fascinated scientists and sci-fi fans alike. While we’re still a very long way from jumping any universal speed limits, that doesn’t mean we’ll never ride the waves of warped space-time.

 

Now a group of physicists have put together the first proposal for a physical warp drive, based on a concept devised back in the ’90s. And they say it shouldn’t break any of laws of physics.

Theoretically speaking, warp drives bend and change the shape of space-time to exaggerate differences in time and distance that, under some circumstances, could see travelers move across distances faster than the speed of light.

One of those circumstances was outlined more than a quarter of a century ago by Mexican theoretical physicist Miguel Alcubierre. His idea, proposed in 1994, was that a spacecraft powered by something called an ‘Alcubierre drive’ could achieve this faster-than-light travel. The problem is it requires a lot of negative energy in one place, something that’s simply not possible according to existing physics.

But the new study has a workaround. According to researchers from the independent research group Applied Physics based in New York, it’s possible to ditch the fiction of negative energy and still make a warp drive, albeit one that’s maybe a bit slower than we’d like. 

 

“We went in a different direction than NASA and others and our research has shown there are actually several other classes of warp drives in general relativity,” says astrophysicist Alexey Bobrick, from Lund University in Sweden.

“In particular, we have formulated new classes of warp drive solutions that do not require negative energy and, thus, become physical.”

Why is negative energy such a big deal? The need for negative energy gets around some of the general relativity problems of faster-than-light travel, by allowing for space to expand and contract faster than light, while keeping everything within its warping within universal speed limits.

Unfortunately, it introduces more problems of its own – primarily that the negative energy we’d require exists only in fluctuations on a quantum scale. Until we can figure a way to scoop up a Sun-sized mass of the stuff, this kind of drive just isn’t possible.

The new research works around this – according to the paper, negative energy wouldn’t be required, but a hugely powerful gravitational field would be. The gravity would do the heavy lifting of bending space-time so that the passage of time inside and outside the warp drive machine would be significantly different.

 

You won’t be able to book tickets just yet though – the amount of mass required to produce a noticeable gravitational effect on space-time would be at least planet-sized, and there are still plenty of questions to answer.

“If we take the mass of the whole planet Earth and compress it to a shell with a size of 10 metres, then the correction to the rate of time inside it is still very small, just about an extra hour in the year,” Bobrick told New Scientist.

One other interesting finding from the research concerns the shape of the warp drive: a wider, taller vessel will need less energy than a long and thin one. Think of a plate being held upright thrown at a wall face first, and you have an idea of the optimum warp drive shape.

Even though the reality of travelling to distant stars and planets is still a long way off, the new study is the latest addition to a growing body of research that suggests that the principles of warp drives are sound in scientific terms.

The researchers admit that they’re still not sure exactly how to put together the technology that they’ve described in their paper, but at least more of the numbers add up now. They’re confident that far into the future, the warp drive will become a reality.

“While we still can’t break the speed of light, we don’t need to in order to become an interstellar species,” says Gianni Martire, one of the scientists at the Applied Physics group behind the new study. “Our warp drive research has the potential to unite us all.”

The research has been published in Classical and Quantum Gravity.

 

Read original article here

Would would Texans require in a Deshaun Watson trade?

The Houston Texans have maintained a public front that Deshaun Watson isn’t going anywhere.

Privately, they’re preparing for the seemingly inevitable, according to the Houston Chronicle’s John McClain. The Texans beat writer reported on Sunday that the team has an idea in mind of the return they’d seek in a deal for Watson.

It is, as expected, a hefty ask. According to McClain, the team would want in a Watson deal: two first-round draft picks, two second-round selections and two young defensive starters. And that would be a starting point.

Is Watson worth it?

While that is a huge haul, it’s also reasonable considering that Houston’s hypothetical trade partner would receive a 25-year-old three-time Pro Bowl quarterback. QBs at Watson’s level at this point in their careers just don’t become available. That is a testament to Houston’s dysfunctional front office.

A historic trade acquisition would fittingly require a massive package in return.

What would it take to pry Watson away from the Texans? (Carmen Mandato/Getty Images)

Who might pay the price?

So who would pay that price? That’s largely unclear.

Count the New York Jets as prime candidates. Watson — who has a no-trade clause in his contract — reportedly prefers the New York Jets as a destination over the Miami Dolphins — or any other team. According to the Miami Herald, Watson likes the idea of playing for new head coach Robert Saleh, whom the Texans reportedly did not consider in their coaching search.

The Jets hold the No. 2 pick in April’s draft, which would presumably come with the option to select a quarterback like Ohio State’s Justin Fields or BYU’s Zach Wilson.

Any NFL team that doesn’t line up Patrick Mahomes, Lamar Jackson or Josh Allen every Sunday should at least kick the tires on a trade.

A win-now team that needs an upgrade at quarterback like the San Francisco 49ers would also be an intriguing trade partner. Would they have to give up Nick Bosa in return? It seems likely.

Whatever comes of trade talks, the Texans should find themselves with no shortage of suitors. When and if a trade goes down, it will be a blockbuster.

More from Yahoo Sports:



Read original article here