Tag Archives: refuse

Bills made the Steelers an offer they couldn’t refuse, but refused it

Many NFL teams have fanbases that become famous in their own regard and often transcend the squad they actually root for in terms of notoriety.

The Steelers obviously have Steeler Nation, a proud fanbase that likes to Twirl Terrible Towels at Heinz Field and talk smack on Twitter. The Browns have the Dawg Pound, a raucous fanbase that enjoys wearing dog masks and barking like them while attending games at FirstEnergy Stadium—and annoying Steelers fans on Twitter. The Seahawks have their 12th Man, a fanbase that’s really loud at Lumen Field—and also on Twitter when complaining about Super Bowl XL. The Packers have the Cheeseheads. I’m sure even the Jaguars have a fanbase. What is it known for other than being very quiet during Jaguars games at TIAA Bank Field—and very noisy on Twitter when talking about the previous day’s Florida Gator’s matchup? I think that’s it, actually.

The Bills have a famous fanbase, one that’s grown in notoriety and popularity over the past few seasons, thanks to Buffalo’s ascension from NFL doormat to Super Bowl contender.

I’m talking about the Bills Mafia, a group of fans whose frontline soldiers love to do things like crash through flaming tables while tailgating before games.

What does this prove, other than alcohol is one helluva drug?

I think that’s it. But, also, it shows that this Bills Mafia really believes in its team for the first time in a while and is super-excited to show it.

Perhaps it’s also meant to intimidate.

I don’t know about you, but I’d be pretty darn intimidated if I was an opposing fan watching these yahoos do their thing.

Intimidating the fans in opposing jerseys might be one thing, but it’s a totally different story to intimidate the opposing players when they visit Highmark Stadium in Orchard Park, New York.

The Bills opened their 2021 season by hosting the underdog Steelers on Sunday, and the Mafia—including thousands upon thousands who were in attendance for the Week 1 showdown—made the visitors an offer they thought they couldn’t refuse: “I invited you to my home for one reason: to finally show my family the proper respect, capisce?”

You see, it wasn’t supposed to be an actual showdown between the Mafia and Steeler Nation. It was expected to be a coronation for the Bills and the next step toward them becoming untouchable “Made Men” and Super Bowl champions.

But the Steelers went ahead and refused the Mafia’s offer to lie down and play dead for 60 minutes. Instead, Pittsburgh slapped the Bills in the face right in front of their mothers, fathers, sisters, great aunts, cousins, everyone wearing the Buffalo horns, etc.

It was a show of utter disrespect by the Steelers and a reminder that, to quote Frank Costello in The Departed, “Heavy is the head that wears the crown.” This was in response to Billy Costigan saying, “Yeah, I could probably be you, but I don’t wanna be you, Frank.”

Do the Bills actually want to be Super Bowl contenders? Do they want to wear that heavy crown? The Steelers have worn that crown. Heck, they’re still trying to wear it, even though many have been trying to encourage them to alter their appearance and go into witness protection.

It’s not easy being a Super Bowl contender. It’s not easy having those expectations. It’s not fun to lay an egg in Week 1 in front of a bunch of people who don’t mind throwing themselves through flaming tables for the sake of YouTube.

The Bills Mafia found out one thing this past Sunday afternoon: The rest of the NFL—including the Pittsburgh Steelers—isn’t ready to bow down and kiss your ring just yet.

Capisce?

Read original article here

Florida doctor will refuse to treat unvaccinated patients

A South Florida doctor became the second physician to make the contentious decision to refuse treatment to unvaccinated patients in a COVID-ravaged state.

Lina Marraccini, a primary care doctor in South Miami, chastised patients for a “lack of selflessness” in a letter that claimed the unvaxxed pose too great a risk to her staff.

“This is a public health emergency — the health of the public takes priority over the rights of any given individual in this situation,” said Marraccini wrote in the letter, obtained by NBC 6.

“It appears that there is a lack of selflessness and concern for the burden on the health and well-being of our society from our encounters.”

The doctor said the ban on unvaccinated patients was due to the FDA’s approval of the Pfzier vaccine. On Sept. 15, she will no longer see unvaccinated patients if they haven’t received their first shot. But exceptions can be made.

“If any of our patients have a valid medical reason for not having the vaccine or have their first shot by September 15, please let us know,” she wrote.

Patients will have one month to find another provider if they desire, during which she said her office will continue to provide virtual appointments for unvaccinated patients. 

Florida is experiencing a major surge in the infectious and more deadly Delta variant throughout the state, overburdening hospitals. According to the latest data released on Sept. 2, the Sunshine State saw 129,240 new cases and 433 new deaths.

Marraccini joins Dr. Jason Valentine of Alabama — the state with the lowest vaccination rate in the country — who announced in Aug. that he would no longer see unvaccinated patients beginning Oct. 1.

Florida is reporting a surge of COVID-19 cases caused by the highly contagious Delta variant.
AP Photo/Marta Lavandier

“We do not yet have any great treatments for severe disease, but we do have great prevention with vaccines,” Valentine wrote in a letter to his patients. “Unfortunately, many have declined to take the vaccine, and some end up severely ill or dead. I cannot and will not force anyone to take the vaccine, but I also cannot continue to watch my patients suffer and die from an eminently preventable disease.”

Marraccini contends that she is not breaking her Hippocratic Oath, an ancient ethics oath taken by physicians that compels doctors to treat all patients to the best of their ability, she told Newsweek. 

She told the paper that she has to consider her other patients who are immunocompromised or have other medical conditions that can make the virus more deadly.

“The Hippocratic Oath is very science-based. I am following the science. I’m applying this to the benefit of the sick.”

Under the Civil Rights Act, doctors can’t deny treatment based on a patient’s age, sex, race, sexual orientation, religion, or national origin, but its unclear if a doctor can refuse to treat a patient over vaccination status.

People wait in line to receive a dose of the COVID-19 vaccine at a Florida Department of Health in Pinellas County.
REUTERS/Octavio Jones

According to the American Medical Association’s Code of Medical Ethics, physicians are obliged to treat emergencies, but otherwise they are “not ethically required to accept all prospective patients … in certain limited circumstances.”

She told the outlet that only about 10 to 15 percent of her patients were either hesitant or refused to get the vaccine.

“I understand that people are free to choose, but to me, it’s a problem when it affects other people,” Marraccini told NBC 6.

“When it comes to the safety of others, when it comes to the fact that it’s a global health problem and community health problem, at this point, I really say that this is where it draws the line in the sand for me,” she said.

Read original article here

Bill Maher says he’ll REFUSE COVID booster saying he only had vaccine to ‘take one for the team’ 

Liberal chat show host Bill Maher has announced he has no plans to get a COVID vaccine booster shot – and said he only got vaccinated in the first place to ‘take one for the team.’ 

On Friday’s episode of Real Time with Bill Maher, the 64 year-old said: ‘I never wanted the vaccine, I took one for the team.

‘And by the way, do you know who doesn’t get a lot of vaccines? Millennials,’ Maher said. ‘I know a lot of millennials, especially the 20 year-olds, they don’t think they need it, they’re probably right. But I tell them I didn’t want it either – I took one for the team.

‘But every eight months you’re going to put this sh*t in me?’ he asked, rhetorically. ‘I don’t know about that.

‘Maybe I don’t need one,’ he said. ‘I don’t want a one-size fits all. My body may be different than your body.’

Maher’s comments provoked the ire of former New York Congressman Max Rose, who was part of Maher’s round-table discussion on the topic.

He replied: ‘Yeah, I lost you man. That’s crazy.’

On his show Friday, Bill Maher said he does not plan to get a booster shot, drawing backlash from former Congressman Max Roe

‘My body isn’t different? Everybody’s body isn’t somewhat different?’ Maher asked in response. ‘I just read the statistics about who dies from this –

‘You’re trying to be cute, you’re rolling the dice,’ Rose said.

‘I’m not trying to be cute,’ Maher shot back.

‘I know I’m in your house,’ Rose told Maher, ‘I’m not trying to step over the line here, but genuinely, genuinely, people’s lives are on the line – and just as significantly our very way of life is on the line here.

‘It’s very important that people get vaccinated. It’s very important that-‘

‘Right, I’m saying get vaccinated,’ Maher said.

‘But if there’s a need for boosters, particularly, particularly as the evidence is showing, amongst those who have underlying conditions, amongst the elderly, so on and so forth, it’ important they take them, and it’s important they trust those who are urging them to do it,’ Rose said.

‘OK, OK,’ Maher replied, ‘but you just said underlying condition and elderly – I don’t count myself either, so is my body different? Can I have some medical autonomy?’

‘No, look, no one is mandating it for you in your particular position,’ Rose said, ‘although they might, but I do think it’s very dangerous to enter into a conversation here about personal responsibility when the truth of the matter is this is a collective responsibility.

‘If large groups of people do not get vaccinated, they go to the hospital, and our hospitals get overrun,’ said Rose. ‘You can’t get a mammogram, you can’t get a biopsy and so many other things – literally society as we know it can’t function.

‘So this is important that people are urged to get vaccinated – it’s important that they do give back.’

‘That’s why I said “the team,”‘ Maher responded, ‘because I did it for the team.’

His other guest, Andrew Sullivan, a British-American author, meanwhile, said he did get a booster shot as he is HIV positive.

Maher has previously tested positive for the virus, despite being fully vaccinated. He was asymptomatic.

Maher has previously tested positive for COVID-19 despite being fully vaccinated

The CDC is now recommending anyone who received either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine get a booster shot eight months after receiving their second dose, with the first scheduled to be administered in late September. 

Officials have said that people who have received the vaccines appear to be losing some of the immunity they gained initially, and say the boosters should offer further immunity as winter approaches, amid fears of a fresh COVID spike. 

‘Based on our latest assessment, the current protection against severe disease, hospitalizations and death could diminish in the months ahead, especially among those who are at higher risk or were vaccinated during the earlier phases of the vaccination rollout,’ United States health officials said in a statement on August 18.

‘For that reason, we conclude that a booster shot will be needed to maximize vaccine-induced protection and prolong its durability.

‘Our top priority remains staying ahead of the virus and protecting the American people from COVID-19 with safe, effective and long-lasting vaccines, especially in the context of a constantly changing virus and epidemiologic landscape,’ they added.

The goal is for people to start receiving a COVID booster shot in the fall, the CDC explains in an FAQ on its website.

The CDC maintains that COVID vaccines are working ‘very well to prevent severe illness, hospitalization and death even against the Delta variant.

‘However, public health experts are starting to see reduced protection against mild and moderate disease. For that reason, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service is planning for a booster shot so vaccinated people maintain protection over the coming months.’

Brandon Rivera,  a Los Angeles County emergency medical technician, gave a second does of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine to Aaron Delgado, 16, at a pop up vaccine clinic on Wednesday

 

 

 

Some five million Americans will be eligible for boosters by late September, the New York Times reports, and the Biden administration has more than 100 million doses that could be used for boosters, plus tens of millions more in freezers at pharmacies and other locations.

The administration has also purchased more supply for delivery this fall.

Meanwhile, the United States has seen a slight dip in cases, with 43,222 reported on August 22, down from 155,496 new cases reported just two days earlier, according to CDC data.

The death rate has also declined, with 164 deaths reported on Monday, down from 375 on Saturday

About 60.8 percent of all Americans have received at least one dose of the COVID vaccine, with just over half reporting that they are fully vaccinated. 

Read original article here

She can’t hug her nephews because millions of Americans refuse to get the Covid-19 vaccine



CNN
—  

All Kimberly Cooley wants to do is hug her 6-year-old nephews – and she can’t because tens of millions of Americans are choosing not to get vaccinated against Covid-19.

Cooley received two doses of Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine in February, but blood tests show the shots didn’t give her antibodies against the virus.

That’s because, like millions of Americans, Cooley takes medications to suppress her immune system. A study by Johns Hopkins researchers that published Monday found that vaccinated immunocompromised people like her are 485 times more likely to end up in the hospital or die from Covid-19 compared to the general population that is vaccinated.

“It’s pure selfishness,” Cooley, a public relations specialist, said of those who have chosen not to be vaccinated. “That’s what it is – it’s pure selfishness when you won’t do your part in the midst of a global health crisis.”

Cooley, 39, is especially vulnerable, since she lives in Montgomery County, Mississippi, where only 37% of residents are fully vaccinated.

She’s taken to Twitter to implore people to roll up their sleeves.

“Mississippi is HOT right now and I’m not referring to the heat,” she tweeted in May. “70% of the state is NOT vaccinated. SEVENTY! Just #TakeTheShot”

Not much has changed in two months – currently, 66% of Mississippi’s population is not fully vaccinated.

Based on an estimate by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, about 9 million Americans are immunocompromised, either because of diseases they have or medications they take.

It has been known for months that Covid-19 vaccines might not work well for this group. The hope was that vaccination rates overall would be so high so that the “herd” would protect them.

But it didn’t work out that way, because about a third of eligible people in the US have not received even one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine.

Monday’s study in the journal Transplantation looked at infection, hospitalization and death rates for 18,215 fully vaccinated organ transplant patients in the US, Croatia and France. Transplant patients take medications to suppress their immune system so they won’t reject their new organs.

The study found that these fully vaccinated organ transplant recipients were 82 times more likely to get a breakthrough Covid-19 infection compared to the vaccinated general population, and 485 times more likely to be hospitalized or die from Covid-19.

Among the 18,215 transplant patients in the study, 151 had breakthrough infections, 87 were hospitalized with Covid-19 and 14 died from the virus.

“This is a stark reminder that there are many vulnerable people around us who have been unable to achieve the same levels of protection that the rest of us have been able to achieve, and as a result are at much higher risk of getting sick or dying from this terrible virus,” said Dr. Dorry Segev, a transplant surgeon at Johns Hopkins Medicine and lead author of the study.

Those numbers terrify Fred Kolkhorst and his wife, Nancy Marlin, both 68.

Kolkhorst, a retired professor at San Diego State University, and Marlin, the university’s former provost, have both received transplants – a new heart for him and a new kidney for her.

Courtesy Fred Kolkhorst and Nancy Marlin

Nancy Marlin, who had a kidney transplant, and Fred Kolkhorst, who had a heart transplant, are “still living a quarantined life.”

Blood tests showed that neither developed antibodies after two doses of the Moderna vaccine. Kolkhorst received a third dose of the vaccine, and his antibodies increased, but it’s unclear if they went up enough to protect him. His wife recently received a third shot, but her doctors tell her it’s unlikely it will work because of the specific immune suppression drug that she takes.

The couple live in a county where 71% of the population age 12 and up are fully vaccinated, but they know that might not be enough to fully protect them if their vaccines don’t work.

Now the couple has been forced to skip gatherings with family and friends and keep mostly to themselves.

“We don’t go out very much,” Kolkhorst said. “We’re still living a quarantined life, and it’s been a year and a half.”

Kolkhorst has heard unvaccinated people argue that it’s their right not to get the shot.

“It’s difficult for me to understand how people talk about personal freedoms, but they’ve impinged on our ability to go out and mingle and be with other people,” he said. “I try not to get mad at them, but it’s so disappointing and frustrating to those of us who can’t get out and be a part of life without being fearful.”

Once, he tried to convince an unvaccinated friend to take the shot. He failed.

“Sometimes you just can’t fix stupid,” he said.

Cooley has also had those conversations with family members and friends.

They remember when she nearly lost her life to liver failure because of a case of autoimmune hepatitis, and what she went through to get a liver transplant in 2018.

They know that she takes care of her mother, who is also immunocompromised. They know that her mother’s mother died of Covid-19 in October.

And they know how much she wants to hug her nephews. She did hug them back in February, two weeks after her second shot, but that was before three blood tests – she’s a part of a study at the University of Mississippi Medical Center – showed the vaccines did not give her antibodies.

Even though these friends and relatives know her story, they still refuse to be vaccinated.

“In my conversations with them, I say, ‘Remember what my life was like before the transplant and during the transplant? Remember how you told me to let you know if there was anything you could do for me?’ Well, this is what I need you to do,” Cooley said.

Some of them did then go out and get a shot, she said, but most of them did not.

“Knowing everything I went through and what I’m going through now, still they could not do this one thing for me,” she said.

“Observation: People are willing to get the vaccine to save their jobs but not for the sake of their parents or ‘loved’ ones. Let that sink in,” she tweeted in March.

Now she can only dream of the day her nephews can come to her house for a sleepover, something they did regularly before Covid. She imagines how they’ll have pizza together and watch the new “Jumanji” and Marvel movies.

For now, she has given up asking friends to get vaccinated, and she stopped imploring people on Twitter, too.

“At this point there is nothing I can say and nothing I can do to change their minds,” she said.

CNN’s Sarah Braner and Justin Lape contributed to this story.



Read original article here

Flight to Bahamas canceled after Winthrop teens refuse to wear masks

An American Airlines flight to the Bahamas was canceled Monday night because some among a group of high school students, reportedly from Winthrop, refused to wear their masks. Flight 893 was ready to depart Charlotte, but a mechanical issue forced the passengers onto a different plane.That’s when fellow passengers say some among the group of teens allegedly refused to put on masks, in accordance with CDC guidelines.“I would not say all of them. I was 75% to 80% of them were being terrible kids, saying smart stuff,” one passenger said.“All they had to do was put the mask on, sit there, no smart mouth comments. And they couldn’t do it,” another passenger said. After hours of standoff the flight to Nassau was canceled. None of the Winthrop students were arrested.The flight cancellation forced other passengers — many of whom were on vacations — to rebook their trips.

An American Airlines flight to the Bahamas was canceled Monday night because some among a group of high school students, reportedly from Winthrop, refused to wear their masks.

Flight 893 was ready to depart Charlotte, but a mechanical issue forced the passengers onto a different plane.

That’s when fellow passengers say some among the group of teens allegedly refused to put on masks, in accordance with CDC guidelines.

“I would not say all of them. I was 75% to 80% of them were being terrible kids, saying smart stuff,” one passenger said.

“All they had to do was put the mask on, sit there, no smart mouth comments. And they couldn’t do it,” another passenger said.

After hours of standoff the flight to Nassau was canceled. None of the Winthrop students were arrested.

The flight cancellation forced other passengers — many of whom were on vacations — to rebook their trips.

Read original article here

Freedom Caucus GOP members refuse to condemn Myanmar coup in US House

  • A House resolution censuring those who carried out the Myanmar coup passed by a 398-14 vote on Friday.
  • Over a dozen GOP Reps., mostly from the pro-Trump Freedom Caucus, opposed the motion.
  • Some of those who voted against the measure tied it to immigration or the results of the US election.  
  • See more stories on Insider’s business page.

On Friday, the US House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed a resolution that censured the military coup in Myanmar by a 398-14 vote. Over a dozen Republicans, most of them from the pro-Trump Freedom Caucus, stood in opposition.

The vote condemned the military generals who orchestrated the coup and called for the Biden administration to place sanctions on them.

Some Freedom Caucus representatives tied their votes to right-wing political talking points, and some referenced the 2020 US elections.

Those who voted no were, 13 of whom are part of the Freedom Caucus:

  1. Rep. Andy Biggs of Arizona
  2. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia
  3. Rep. Lauren Boebert of Colorado
  4. Rep. Chip Roy of Texas
  5. Rep. Scott Perry of Pennsylvania
  6. Rep. Andy Harris of Maryland
  7. Rep. Ted Budd of North Carolina
  8. Rep. Mary Miller of Illinois
  9. Rep. Alex Mooney of West Virginia
  10. Rep. Barry Moore of Alabama
  11. Rep. Jody Hice of Georgia
  12. Rep. Ken Buck of Colorado
  13. Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida

Rep. Paul Gosar of Arizona, a member of the caucus, voted present.

One Republican, who is not a part of the Freedom Caucus, also voted against the resolution: Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky.

Perry objected to Pennsylvania’s electors ahead of the insurrection on January 6, and on Friday, and his spokesperson told Forbes that the Myanmar resolution “is an overt attempt to trap Republicans into condemning the claims of evidence of election fraud in Burma while perpetuating similar claims (in the Democrat’s views) of evidence in US elections.”

Harris issued a statement aimed at immigrants, saying that Congress should address, “COVID positive illegal aliens being dispersed into our communities rather than wasting time on useless resolutions about a foreign country.”

Biggs, the caucus chair, posted a video on Twitter explaining his opposition to the resolution. 

In the video, Biggs said the violence resulting from the coup is “tragic.” However, Biggs says that “there is suffering everywhere in the world” and he believes the US “can’t be the military police for the entire world.” He alleged that the resolution was a means to “put our foot in the door in Burma.”

In Myanmar’s November elections, the ruling National League for Democracy won 396 out of 476 seats in Parliament, with the military-affiliated Union Solidarity and Development Party winning 33 seats.

The military, known as the Tatmadaw, claimed that the election was rife with voter fraud — charging 8.6 million instances of “voter irregularities” among a population of 54 million — a claim that was rejected by the country’s election commission, according to the AP.

Top members of the ruling party, including civilian leader Aung San Suu Kyi and President Win Myint, were detained by the military.

Mass protests have followed the coup in Myanmar since early February, and according to the UN, military forces have killed at least 138 protesters since then. The military has also instituted media and internet blackouts. 

After the vote on Friday, Democratic Rep. Don Beyer of Virginia tweeted that, “The House QAnon Caucus refuses to condemn the military coup in Burma.”



Read original article here

Blazers Out-Lillard Fox, Refuse to Hield in Victory Over Kings

The Portland Trail Blazers and Sacramento Kings engaged in a scoring-heavy slugfest on Thursday night, dueling nose-to-nose for 48 minutes in a game where neither could keep a double-digit lead. Portland kept their customary advantage at the three-point arc, but they gave away the benefits by allowing Sacramento to score like hotcakes in the lane and on the run. But the Blazers had a trump card that Sacramento didn’t. Damian Lillard zeroed in on the win as the clock dwindled in the fourth. The Kings couldn’t do a thing to stop him. At the end of a long and somewhat-messy evening, the Blazers earned a 123-119 victory.

Sacramento’s De’Aaron Fox scored 32 in the fray, Lillard countered with 44 for the Blazers.

First Quarter

For the second straight night, the Blazers started off with less than sterling effectiveness on defense. The Kings are not the Golden State Warriors. They could not stretch out a double-digit lead, mostly because they can’t defend either. But Sacramento made the most of mid-range jumpers and paint points to double up Portland 10-5. The Blazers kept hitting shots, at least intermittently, but they allowed Sacramento easy points in transition and just couldn’t put out the fire. As the period progressed, Enes Kanter became a hub of the offense, helping the Blazers push around the smaller Kings lineup in the halfcourt. Lillard and De’Aaron Fox engaged in a running battle throughout the period; Dame turned on the afterburners, finishing the quarter with 15, Fox with 10. When the dust settled from ALL of that, Portland led 30-27. Yeah, it was a lot.

Second Quarter

Portland’s second unit exploded out of the gate in the second period. Nassir Little opened up with a great drive, followed by threes from Anfernee Simons and, later, Carmelo Anthony. The bench has become a potent offensive force. The defense couldn’t quite keep pace, but Sacramento never managed to string together an extended run. The teams went back and forth until the starters came back in. Then they went back and forth some more. The Kings tried the double-team-Lillard defense, but they didn’t have the ancillary defenders to make it pay off. Dame’s teammates scored easily. But every time Portland got an advantage, they gave it back. The Blazers led only 59-56 at the half.

Third Quarter

The Blazers did just what they wanted as the second half opened. They hit 3 threes and a like number of layups, with assists on half of their shots. The offense looked like a greased wheel sliding down a mountain of ice. Once again separation eluded them, as they allowed Sacramento to score in transition and pile up paint points. The analytics advantage breaks down when you let the opponent score easily. When the Kings started hitting threes too, Portland’s slim lead evaporated. Portland just kept letting the opponent hang around. Sacramento led 90-89 after three.

Fourth Quarter

Both teams played positionless basketball to start the fourth…if by “positionless” we mean “centerless” and, largely, “scoreless”. The first four minutes of the period resembled a seventh-grade scrum where packs of people followed the ball randomly, with plenty of bricks decorating the edges.

After that mess, Fox came through with buckets for the Kings, which pushed their lead to a comparatively-huge 5 points. Anthony and Rodney Hood once again stuck up for the bench, but Portland still couldn’t keep the Kings out of the ding-dang lane. Sacramento looked good.

But hey, Damian Lillard does NOT go quietly into the night. With the outcome in doubt, he hit a three, drilled a pristine pass to Enes Kanter at the rim, and converted a layup pretty much in succession. AND THEN he hit another three with 1:56 remaining to give his team a 4-point lead. AND THEN he drained another. He would score 10 down the stretch. Kanter had a monster effort on defense late in the game as well. The 1-2 combo was too much for the Kings to handle. The Kings made it interesting with a couple late scores and had a chance to tie at the buzzer, but the Blazers fouled instead of letting them shoot a three. The Kings borked the final free throw play. Portland got to laugh last in the otherwise-pitched battle and walked away with the W.

Boxscore

The Blazers get a week-long break before resuming the season after the All-Star Break. Stay tuned for Steve Dewald’s analysis of this game in the extended recap and join us throughout the weekend for NBA All-Star Game coverage, trade deadline talk, and more!

Read original article here

Governor’s office to withhold vaccines from five counties next week

Governor’s office to withhold vaccines from five counties next week

The governor’s office will be withholding COVID-19 vaccinations from five Iowa counties in the next week. In a call with media outlets, the Iowa Department of Public Health Director Kelly Garcia said each county is required to distribute 80% of their allotted COVID-19 vaccines each week according to their population size. If they do not administer 80% of vaccines, the county will not receive their next week’s allocation of vaccines. Garcia told news outlets that five counties will not be receiving their next COVID-19 vaccinations next week, but refused to identify the counties. KCRG was able to identify the counties as Washington, Chickasaw, Hancock, Poweshiek and Buchanan. The county health departments told KCRG that it’s leading to a series of concerns around vaccination plans. However, the governor’s office said it would reconsider restricting the vaccines if the five counties could hit the 80% goal by the end of Friday. The IDPH wrote KCRG that the “pause in allocation will allow each county to focus on administering the several hundred unused doses they have on hand during that time.”

The governor’s office will be withholding COVID-19 vaccinations from five Iowa counties in the next week.

In a call with media outlets, the Iowa Department of Public Health Director Kelly Garcia said each county is required to distribute 80% of their allotted COVID-19 vaccines each week according to their population size. If they do not administer 80% of vaccines, the county will not receive their next week’s allocation of vaccines.

Garcia told news outlets that five counties will not be receiving their next COVID-19 vaccinations next week, but refused to identify the counties.

KCRG was able to identify the counties as Washington, Chickasaw, Hancock, Poweshiek and Buchanan.

The county health departments told KCRG that it’s leading to a series of concerns around vaccination plans. However, the governor’s office said it would reconsider restricting the vaccines if the five counties could hit the 80% goal by the end of Friday.

The IDPH wrote KCRG that the “pause in allocation will allow each county to focus on administering the several hundred unused doses they have on hand during that time.”

Read original article here

Apple will replace 2016/2017 MacBook Pro batteries that refuse to charge

If your MacBook Pro refuses to hold charge past 1 percent, you may be able to get its battery replaced for free. Apple has launched a battery replacement program for 2016 and 2017 MacBook Pro models experiencing the issue. The tech giant has just rolled out macOS 11.2.1 and a macOS Catalina 10.15.7 supplemental update, which were meant to fix the bug preventing the affected computers’ battery from being charged. But if the patches don’t work, then you can contact Apple or take your laptop to a service center.

Apple says “a very small number of customers” are experiencing the issue and that the battery health status of affected laptops show the “Service Recommended” warning. You can see your device’s battery health status by clicking on the battery icon or by going to System Preferences. The MacBook Pro models that could be suffering from this issue are listed below:

  • MacBook Pro (13­-inch, 2016, Two Thunderbolt 3 Ports)

  • MacBook Pro (13-­inch, 2017, Two Thunderbolt 3 Ports)

  • MacBook Pro (13-­inch, 2016, Four Thunderbolt 3 Ports)

  • MacBook Pro (13-­inch, 2017, Four Thunderbolt 3 Ports)

  • MacBook Pro (15-­inch, 2016)

  • MacBook Pro (15-­inch, 2017)

This isn’t the first replacement program Apple launched for these particular laptops. Back in 2018, it started a replacement program for 13-inch MacBook Pros manufactured between October 2016 and October 2017, because their batteries were in danger of swelling if they malfunctioned. It also launched a keyboard service program for the models, which suffer from “sticky” and unresponsive keys.

Read original article here

Sanders threatens to advance coronavirus stimulus with reconciliation if Republicans refuse support

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., said Sunday that Democrats will move pass a COVID-19 relief package through reconciliation, a special process that allows for a 51-majority vote, rather than the 60 votes normally required to advance legislation, if Republicans do not quickly express support for the $1.9 trillion bill.

Sanders, the incoming chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, said in an appearance on CNN’s “State of the Union” that unlike Republicans who used reconciliation to pass a tax cut bill and attempt to repeal Obamacare, Democrats will use 50 votes in the Senate, plus Vice President Kamala Harris’ tie-breaking vote, to “pass legislation desperately needed by working families in this country right now.”

BERNIE SANDERS ON DEMS GETTING LEGISLATION THROUGH WITH FILIBUSTER: ‘DAMN RIGHT WE WILL’

“If Republicans are willing to work with us to address that crisis, welcome – let’s do it. But what we cannot do is wait weeks and weeks and months to go forward. We’ve got to act now. That’s what the American people want,” Sanders told CNN anchor Dana Bash.

“These are major policy changes, and I criticized Republicans for using reconciliation to give tax breaks to billions to create a situation where large profitable corporations now pay zero in federal income taxes. Yes, I did criticize them for that,” Sanders said. “And if they want to criticize me for helping to feed children who are hungry – or senior citizens who are isolated and alone and don’t have enough food, they can criticize me. I think it’s the appropriate step forward.”

Sanders, a self-described democratic socialist, said the Senate must break through the “old approach” that it could take years to get anything done, arguing that, “we don’t have time to sit around weeks on impeachment and not get vaccines into the arms of people.”

“We can chew bubble gum and walk at the same time. The American people are hurting and they want us to act. That’s what our candidates ran for in this election,” Sanders said, claiming that’s why Democrats narrowly won back the Senate. “That’s what the guys in Georgia won on and we have got to reaffirm the faith in the American people in government that we can respond to their pain.”

Reconciliation provides a fast-track process to consider bills to implement the policy choices embodied in the annual congressional budget resolution. Unlike other bills, reconciliation bills cannot be stalled by a filibuster and only need a simple majority in the Senate, instead of the usual 60-vote supermajority.

BERNIE SANDERS’ MITTENS TREND ON INAUGURATION DAY, TWITTER REACTS: ‘WE WANT TO KEEP WARM’

That means in the currently divided 50-50 Senate, the newly sworn-in Harris would cast the tie-breaking 51st vote to give Democrats the slimmest majority. Special rules have been designed to protect the rights of the minority party.

Sanders has signaled a willingness to pass legislation without GOP support by using this special process that’s reserved for tax and fiscal matters. The first test could be Biden’s $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief legislation that is the first priority for the new Democratic administration.

Biden’s COVID-19 proposal also includes a provision to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour, vaccine funding, money for schools and state and local governments — priorities that may not fit into budget reconciliation rules. Democrats may be required to pick up GOP votes or compromise for a smaller package that has bipartisan support.

During the 115th Congress, Republicans used reconciliation twice to pursue their policy goals, according to a House Committee on the Budget report published in October 2020.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

In the final months of 2017, the House and Senate approved a reconciliation measure to cut taxes mostly for the wealthy and corporations and to eliminate the penalty for not having health insurance. The Congressional Budget Office estimated at the time that the legislation would add $1.5 trillion to federal deficits over 10 years, which has been revised to $1.9 trillion. President Trump signed this legislation into law on Dec. 22, 2017.

Earlier in that same year, Republicans attempted to use reconciliation to dismantle the Affordable Care Act. The House approved a reconciliation measure to repeal major provisions of the health care law and cap federal funding for Medicaid, but the Senate failed to get the needed votes to advance a bill.

Fox News’ Marisa Schultz contributed to this report.

Read original article here