Tag Archives: reflect

Mariska Hargitay, Christopher Meloni and More ‘SVU’ Stars Reflect on Show’s 25 Years: “Shifting the Narrative on How Survivors Are Treated” – Hollywood Reporter

  1. Mariska Hargitay, Christopher Meloni and More ‘SVU’ Stars Reflect on Show’s 25 Years: “Shifting the Narrative on How Survivors Are Treated” Hollywood Reporter
  2. ‘Law & Order: SVU’: Christopher Meloni On Special Bond w/ Mariska Hargitay Access Hollywood
  3. Star Tracks: Mariska Hargitay, Ice T, Brian Cox [PHOTOS] PEOPLE
  4. ‘Law & Order: SVU’ 25th anniversary: Mariska Hargitay, Meloni, more Business Insider
  5. Mariska Hargitay Commands Attention in High-Shine Silver Dress and More Standout Style Moments of the Week Yahoo Life

Read original article here

Watch: KISS’s PAUL STANLEY And GENE SIMMONS Reflect On The Past, Present And Future As ‘A New Era’ Begins – BLABBERMOUTH.NET

  1. Watch: KISS’s PAUL STANLEY And GENE SIMMONS Reflect On The Past, Present And Future As ‘A New Era’ Begins BLABBERMOUTH.NET
  2. KISS Unveils the Next Era of Boomer Rock: Touring Digital Avatars Gizmodo
  3. Express View: Rock band Kiss’s digital avatars and the immortal artist The Indian Express
  4. KISS say farewell to live touring, become first US band to go virtual and become digital avatars syracuse.com
  5. GENE SIMMONS Aftershow Interview Following Last KISS Show Ever Streaming – “It Needs To Be Said: Everything Is About The Fans” bravewords.com
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Gwen Stefani Says She’ll Never Write Anything That Doesn’t Reflect Her Life – Rolling Stone

  1. Gwen Stefani Says She’ll Never Write Anything That Doesn’t Reflect Her Life Rolling Stone
  2. Gwen Stefani Admits She Was Just as Shocked as We Were When She Began Her Relationship With Blake Shelton SheKnows
  3. Gwen Stefani Gets Candid on Rock Stardom, Motherhood & Life in Oklahoma With Blake Shelton | PEOPLE People
  4. Gwen Stefani, 53, gushes about life with Blake Shelton calling their love an ‘amazing gift’ as she feels ‘at h Daily Mail
  5. Gwen Stefani Reflects on ‘Terrible’ Time After Gavin Rossdale Divorce and Unexpected Blake Shelton Romance TooFab
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Tom Hanks would boycott any books rewritten to reflect “modern sensitivities” – NME

  1. Tom Hanks would boycott any books rewritten to reflect “modern sensitivities” NME
  2. Tom Hanks Takes A Stance Against Cancel Culture: “Let Me Decide What I Am Offended By” — World of Reel Jordan Ruimy
  3. Tom Hanks Confesses He Felt Insecure About Forrest Gump MovieWeb
  4. Tom Hanks’ ‘The Making of Another Major Motion Picture Masterpiece’: Listen to an Excerpt Featuring Holland Taylor (Exclusive) Hollywood Reporter
  5. Tom Hanks, actor and first-time novelist, shows his Chicago cred at Auditorium Theatre Chicago Sun-Times
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

‘Deadliest Catch’ stars reflect on facing ‘violent’ Bering Sea in new season: ‘It’s a younger person’s game’ – Fox News

  1. ‘Deadliest Catch’ stars reflect on facing ‘violent’ Bering Sea in new season: ‘It’s a younger person’s game’ Fox News
  2. WA deckhand joins ‘Deadliest Catch’s’ 19th season The Seattle Times
  3. ‘Deadliest Catch’ Season 19: Meet The New Cast Members & Everything Else To Know HollywoodLife
  4. Captain Andy Hillstrand: ‘Deadliest Catch’ star lives low-key life after Season 13 exit MEAWW
  5. Who Is New ‘Deadliest Catch’ Cast Member Sophia Nielsen? Distractify
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

From ‘will snatch CM and PM’s chair’ to calling PM Modi ‘Ravana’: Atiq Ahmed’s past speeches reflect his arrogance of wielding political power – OpIndia

  1. From ‘will snatch CM and PM’s chair’ to calling PM Modi ‘Ravana’: Atiq Ahmed’s past speeches reflect his arrogance of wielding political power OpIndia
  2. International Media Coverage Of Atiq: Bbc, Reuters, Guardian Calls Him ‘Robinhood’ & ‘Law Maker’ India Today
  3. The killing of Atiq and Ashraf Ahmed on live TV, and the UP govt’s response The Indian Express
  4. How Did Atiq’s Shooters Access Foreign-Made Weapons | 6 Big Questions | #shorts The Quint
  5. Meet the woman who fought Atiq Ahmed for over 30 years to get back her land – India Today India Today
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

CDC revamps children’s growth charts to reflect higher BMIs

For parents, a visit to the pediatrician usually involves a discussion of where their child falls on a growth chart established by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Now, in a bid for better treatment and tracking of kids with high body mass index (BMI), the agency has issued extended growth charts for children with BMIs that aren’t reflected on the older charts.

The old BMI charts were issued in 2000 based on representative data from the 1960s to 1980s. Because of a lack of data, children with obesity weren’t reflected in those charts, which extended to the 97th percentile and a BMI of 37. The new charts extend to a BMI of 60 and indicate how far a child’s BMI is from median measures for children of the same age and sex.

The CDC defines severe obesity as a BMI greater than or equal to 120 percent of the 95th percentile on the BMI-for-age growth charts. A severely obese 2-year-old, for example, would have a BMI above 23, while a severely obese 13-year-old would have a BMI above 31 for girls and 30 for boys.

“I encourage healthcare providers to use the extended growth charts as a tool when working with children and adolescents with severe obesity,” Karen Hacker, director of the CDC’s National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, said in a news release. “Intervening early is critical to improving the health of our children as they grow into adults.”

When it comes to children and adolescents without obesity, the previous growth charts won’t change. The CDC decided to retain the existing percentile system to maintain a point of reference for historical measures of BMI and for research comparability purposes.

The rate of obesity among children and adolescents ages 2 through 19 rose from 5.2 percent in 1970-1971 to 19.3 percent in 2017-2018, according to the CDC. Severe obesity rates in the age group increased from 1 percent in 1970-1971 to 6.1 percent in 2017-2018.

Read original article here

Meta’s chip deal with Qualcomm may reflect its unrealized VR ambitions

Qualcomm and Meta have signed a multi-year agreement promising to team up on custom versions of Qualcomm’s Snapdragon XR chips for the “future roadmap of Quest products” and “other devices,” as Mark Zuckerberg put it.

While, in some ways, the move is business as usual — the Quest 2 is powered by the Snapdragon XR2 chipset — it could provide insight into Meta’s compromises as it faces declines in revenue and tries to keep the spiraling expenses of Mark’s metaverse project in check.

What the Qualcomm deal shows is that Meta’s upcoming headsets, which reportedly include a high-end headset codenamed Cambria and, later, new versions of its cheaper Quest headset, won’t run on completely customized Meta-designed silicon.

This is despite competing companies like Apple, Amazon, and Google making product decisions around custom chip designs like M2, Graviton3, and Tensor — and the fact that Meta’s had a team dedicated to doing the same since 2018. This press release says the chips will be “customized” for Meta’s needs. Still, we don’t know how much space that can put between its “premium” devices and other manufacturers’ hardware that hews closely to Qualcomm’s Snapdragon XR reference designs.

In April, The Verge reported that Meta employees were working with semiconductor fabs — the companies that actually produce the physical chips — to make custom chips for its as-of-yet unannounced AR headset. That same month, The Information reported that some of Meta’s efforts to create custom chips were hitting roadblocks, pushing it to use a Qualcomm chip for its second-gen Ray-Bay smart glasses instead of its own silicon.

Qualcomm reference designs for wired and wireless smart glasses
Qualcomm

Tyler Yee, a Meta spokesperson, said that the company doesn’t discuss details about how its roadmap has evolved and wouldn’t comment on any specific plans it may have had for custom chips for Quest products. However, Yee did share a statement on the company’s “general approach to custom silicon,” saying that Meta doesn’t believe in a “one-size-fits-all approach” for the tech powering its future devices.

“There could be situations where we use off-the-shelf silicon or work with industry partners on customizations, while also exploring our own novel silicon solutions. There could also be scenarios where we use both partner and custom solutions in the same product,” he said. “It is all about doing what is needed to create the best metaverse experiences possible.”

The backdrop to all this is a company facing a lot of pressure. Meta’s revenue has dipped for the first time (thanks in part to Apple’s changes to how apps are allowed to track users), and Zuckerberg explicitly stated plans to turn up the heat on employees while admitting, “I think some of you might just say that this place isn’t for you. And that self-selection is okay with me.” At the same time, he’s making a massive bet on the metaverse — the company is spending, and losing, billions of dollars per year on the project, which includes AR and VR headsets.

It’s a high-stakes game that Meta would presumably want to play as close to the chest as possible. But for now, it seems the hardware customers access Zuckerberg’s Metaverse with (if they’re going to do that at all, instead of just playing Beat Saber) will remain powered by somebody else’s chips.

Read original article here

Future Covid-19 cases and deaths will reflect US health system’s racial inequities

Most public health experts believe Covid-19 will never be eradicated. But the risks have become more tolerable: Six in 10 Americans are now fully vaccinated, and new antivirals are coming that reduce the chances of a person ending up in the hospital because of the virus.

The next stage of the pandemic is still taking shape. It’s too soon to say whether the omicron variant that has caused so much recent concern will drive a new wave of infections around the world. But, whether or not omicron becomes dominant, some Americans will be more at risk from Covid than others going forward. And in any version of endemic Covid — where, for many, Covid-19 can be akin to the flu, undesirable but manageable — some people, especially the elderly and immunocompromised, will face a higher risk by default.

The lifesaving promise offered by vaccinations and effective treatments can only be realized if people actually have access to them — and only if they are treated fairly and equitably when they do see a doctor.

Unfortunately, Americans do not have equitable access to medical care. Across 25 different measures of health status, including life expectancy, infant mortality and prevalence of chronic illnesses, Black Americans fare worse than white Americans on 19 of them, according to a May 2021 Kaiser Family Foundation report. American Indians and Alaskan Natives fare worse on 17; Hispanic Americans see poorer outcomes on 14 of the metrics.

The experience of the past two years has only served to underline how fundamentally unfair the US health system is.

Vaccination is still the most effective way to protect everyone against Covid-19, and the vaccines are free, regardless of insurance, immigration status. But, after months of public health campaigning, 30 percent of the US is still unvaccinated. Vaccination rates among Black adults (65 percent) are slightly lower than among white adults (70 percent); Hispanic adults (61 percent) have an even bigger gap. People who are uninsured, who are also disproportionately Black and Hispanic, are the least likely to be vaccinated. All of these trends reflect existing inequities in the US health system, where historically underserved groups have less access to health care.

In addition to the major determinants of age, health, and vaccination status, at least three other factors will determine how much risk Americans face from Covid-19.

Risk factor No. 1: Insurance coverage

The first risk factor is lack of insurance coverage, which is already the variable that appears most strongly correlated with whether someone received the vaccine. About 10 percent of people living in America, 27 million people, do not have health insurance — the most fundamental inequity in the US health system.

The Covid-19 vaccines are a prime example of how powerful insurance status is in determining whether or not a person receives necessary medical care. Only about 44 percent of uninsured Americans under 65 have received at least one dose of the vaccine, compared to 65 percent of the insured under 65. Of all the subcategories polled in July by the Kaiser Family Foundation for its Covid-19 vaccine monitor — from race to age group to political party — the uninsured had the lowest vaccination rate, even though the Covid-19 vaccines are actually free to everybody regardless of insurance.

Kaiser Family Foundation

That puts the uninsured at a higher risk out of the gate, given how much vaccination reduces the risk of developing a serious case of Covid-19 or getting infected in the first place.

If a person does get infected, timely treatment is the best way to head off severe symptoms. The new Covid-19 antivirals from Merck (which reduces the risk of hospitalization by about 30 percent, according to the latest data) and Pfizer (which reduced hospitalization rates by as much as 90 percent in clinical trials) are most effective when people have mild or moderate symptoms.

But uninsured Americans delay seeking care because of the perceived costs of doing so. More than 30 percent of uninsured Americans said in a 2019 KFF survey that they’d either delayed care or went without it because of the cost, versus less than 10 percent of people with insurance. Even small out-of-pocket costs, as little as $10, have been shown to prevent people from taking medication as prescribed.

And the slow uptake of the Covid-19 vaccines suggests that, even when care is free, the presumption that it will still be costly to somebody who is uninsured can keep those people away from the doctor or pharmacy.

Risk factor No. 2: Access to medical care

The second risk factor is a person’s ability to access health care; the new antivirals appear most effective at earlier stages of the disease, which means patients need to be able to be seen by a doctor in a timely manner in order to head off more severe symptoms.

Geography and socioeconomic characteristics are linked with whether people can actually find a doctor. Roughly 80 percent of rural America was considered to be medically underserved in a 2019 government analysis. People who live in urban centers also receive worse quality of care than people who live on the fringes of metro areas (i.e., suburbs), per a federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality report. Low-income Americans are less likely to have ready access to a primary care doctor than their wealthier peers.

The number of Americans with an established primary care doctor has been declining in recent years. At the same time, studies have found that people who do not have that kind of relationship with a physician develop more serious symptoms before they do seek care, which tends to lead to worse health outcomes. Their health problems are also more likely to persist if they don’t have a primary care doctor to follow up with after an acute emergency.

We have seen the importance of these established patient-physician relationships in the vaccination drive as well. Unvaccinated Americans have said in surveys that they are most likely to be persuaded by their personal doctor.

Risk factor No. 3: Equitable treatment

But having an insurance card and physically walking into a doctor’s office are only the first two steps to receiving effective treatment. Once there, a patient needs to be treated fairly by their doctor — the third risk, if they don’t receive that equitable treatment.

And, unfortunately, there is a growing body of evidence that, separate from insurance status and other variables, Black and Hispanic patients in America do not receive the same quality of care as their white counterparts. Health care providers are less likely to view their symptoms as serious and less likely to prescribe necessary medications to treat their illness. Already, Black and Hispanic Americans have experienced higher rates of death and hospitalization during the pandemic than their white peers.

“Given that people of color are less likely to have health coverage, are more likely to face barriers to accessing care, and receive poorer quality of care, they are likely to face disparities in obtaining care and treatment for Covid-19,” Samantha Artiga, director of the Racial Equity and Health Policy Program at the Kaiser Family Foundation, told me.

There is a racial component to the first two risk factors. Black and Hispanic Americans are more likely to be uninsured than white Americans. They are also less likely to have reliable access to medical care.

But race alone can determine whether or not an American receives appropriate medical care. Black and Hispanic Americans are more likely to say they’ve had negative experiences with a health care provider than white people, with higher shares reporting that their doctor did not believe them or that they were refused a test or treatment they thought they needed.

“Race is a factor, and I would say that it’s distinct from other barriers because it erodes care quality for patients of color directly and indirectly,” Kumi Smith, a University of Minnesota epidemiologist, told me. “Directly through implicit or explicit racial biases held by providers, indirectly through the racially disparate ways that societal resources and benefits are distributed across society. So in a way, patients of color, especially Black patients, suffer the consequences of racism twice over.”

According to multiple studies that have tried to look at the problem empirically, the discrimination that people of color describe in those surveys is real. Studies have shown that Black people are less likely than white people to be prescribed pain medications and are subjected to longer wait times in the emergency department.

New research looked at prescriptions for heart medications — the kind of routine care for serious but treatable illness that we hope Covid-19 antivirals will become — and once again found the same racial disparities, even when controlling for other factors such as insurance status.

The study, led by Utibe Essien at the University of Pittsburgh, examined patients with atrial fibrillation who were treated at the local Veterans Affairs hospital system. It found that Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to start taking medication for their condition. These patients were being treated at an integrated hospital system (eliminating the access issue) and the researchers focused on a subgroup of patients who enrolled in Medicare Part D to cover the cost of their care (eliminating the problem of uninsurance).

Yet disparities persisted in the treatment received by Black and Hispanic patients. Essien has written on this issue of “pharmacoequity,” which attempts to capture the full extent of the disadvantages that people of color face in receiving necessary medical care.

“Race is not just foundational to the challenges of underinsurance and access but access to treatments, from monoclonal antibodies to antiviral therapies,” he told me.

These inequities have been with us for a long time. They will continue to be with us in the future. And so long as Covid-19 continues to circulate, many Americans of color will face a higher risk from the virus as a result.

Read original article here

“Vulture bees” evolved a taste for flesh—and their microbiomes reflect that

Enlarge / University of California, Riverside scientists suspended fresh pieces of raw chicken from branches to attract carrion-feeding “vulture bees” in Costa Rica.

Quinn McFrederick/UCR

Ask a random person to picture a bee, and they’ll likely conjure up the familiar black-and-yellow striped creature buzzing from flower to flower collecting pollen to bring back to the hive. But a more unusual group of bees can be found “slicing chunks of meat from carcasses in tropical rainforests,” according to the authors of a new paper published in the journal mBio. As a result, these bees have gut microbiomes that are markedly different from their fellow buzzers, with populations more common to carrion-loving hyenas and vultures. So they are commonly known as “vulture bees” (or “carrion bees”).

According to the authors—entomologists who hail from the University of California, Riverside (UCR), the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Columbia University, and the American Museum of Natural History—most bees are essentially “wasps that switched to a vegetarian lifestyle.” But there are two recorded examples of bumblebees feeding on carrion dating back to 1758 and 1837, and some species are known to occasionally feed on carrion in addition to foraging for nectar and pollen. (They are considered “facultatively necrophages,” as opposed to vulture bees, which are deemed “obligate necrophages” because they only eat meat.)

An entomologist named Filippo Silvestri identified the first “vulture bee” in 1902 while analyzing a group of pinned specimens, although nobody called it that since they didn’t know at the time that this species fed on carrion. Silvestri dubbed it Trigona hypogea, and he also described their nests as being used for honey and pollen, although later researchers noted a surprising absence of pollen. Rather, biochemical analysis revealed the presence of secretions similar to those fed to queen bees in the nests of honeybees.

Then, in 1982, entomologist David Roubik of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute in Panama reported some surprising findings from his observations of Trigona hypogea colonies. Rather than gathering pollen from flowers, this species ingested the flesh of dead animals: lizards, monkeys, snakes, fish, and birds. Bees that stumbled on a tasty bit of rotting flesh deposited a trail of pheromones to call its nest mates, who typically converged en masse on the corpse within eight hours.

Trigona hypogea busily harvests the decaying flesh of a small lizard. Because it can.”>
Enlarge / A worker bee of Trigona hypogea busily harvests the decaying flesh of a small lizard. Because it can.

D.W. Roubik, 1982

The vulture bees often entered a carcass via the eyes, similar to maggots, and Roubik made particular note of just how efficiently they could consume a carcass. A large lizard was reduced to a skeleton over two days, while the bees took just eight hours to remove all feathers and flesh from the head of a dead passerine. They reduced two frogs to skeletons in six hours. Because they fed on carrion rather than collecting pollen, this species had a distinctive hind leg, with a drastically reduced pollen basket compared to “vegetarian” bees.

The bees consumed the flesh on-site, storing a kind of “meat slurry” in their crops to bring back to the hive. Roubik hypothesized that, once at the hive, the bees converted that slurry into some kind of glandular substance, which they then stored in wax pots. “Considering animal flesh rots and would be unsuitable as stored food, its metabolic conversion is essential to allow storage,” he wrote. Another hypothesis, proposed in 1996, suggests that the actual flesh is what’s stored in the wax pots.

Trigona hypogea.”>
Enlarge / The toothed mandible (A) and hind tibia (B) of Trigona hypogea.

D.W. Roubik, 1982

We now know of three distinct groups of vulture bees that exclusively get their protein from carcasses: the aforementioned Trigona hypogea, Trigona crassipes, and Trigona necrophages. These are stingless bees, but they have five large, pointed teeth, and they have been known to bite. Some excrete substances with their bites that can cause painful blisters and sores.

Read original article here

The Ultimate News Site