Tag Archives: reconciliation

Manchin and Sinema meet with Biden over reconciliation bill concerns

Moderate Democrats Senator Joe Manchin and Senator Kyrsten Sinema held separate meetings with President Biden at the White House Tuesday, as the White House and most Democrats push an up-to $3.5 trillion bill to expand the social safety net. 

Mr. Biden’s first-term domestic agenda is packed into the massive bill, which has no Republican support and will have to be passed by using a budgetary process called reconciliation. This will enable it to pass with 50 votes, rather than the 60 votes that are normally required to pass Senate measures. Its fate is largely in the hands of the two moderates, Sinema and Manchin, because the Senate is evenly divided, 50-50.  

Both senators have said the bill is too large and must be trimmed to win their support.

Another factor: House progressives are demanding that the Senate vote on the larger bill first, or they will not support the smaller $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill that passed with bipartisan support in the Senate.

Late Tuesday, the president canceled a scheduled Wednesday trip to Chicago to talk about COVID-19 vaccines, so he can stay in town and work on advancing the infrastructure and reconciliation bills. 

Sinema, of Arizona, declined to answer questions about her meeting with the president upon her return to Capitol Hill. She has said little publicly about what she wants to see cut from the final reconciliation bill, except to note its price is too high. Sinema is scheduled to hold a fundraiser Tuesday with business lobbying groups that oppose the reconciliation bill, according to the New York Times. 

“I will leave it to them to convey where they are comfortable in terms of topline numbers, but the president felt it was constructive, felt they moved the ball forward, felt there was agreement that we’re at a pivotal moment,” White House press secretary Jen Psaki said after the president’s meeting with Sinema but before the meeting with her West Virginia colleague had concluded. 

Manchin also divulged little after his meeting with the president, saying it lasted maybe 60 or 90 minutes.

“We’re still dealing in good faith,” Manchin said of the various meetings he’s had over the reconciliation bill. 

But he has expressed concerns about some of the climate provisions in the bill, as well as the expansion of Medicare.

“The people that are getting Medicare now just want to make sure they’re going to get it, they’re not going to have their services cut by 2026, when it goes insolvent, that’s the thing they’re concerned about,” he told reporters earlier this month. 

At this point, the reconciliation bill includes a $150 billion “clean electricity performance program” that would pay utility companies to source their energy from renewables, a program that’s modeled on clean energy standards adopted by some states. The West Virginia senator objects to the program and said it would unnecessarily provide financial incentives for energy providers.

“The transition is happening,” Manchin said on CNN earlier this month. “Now they’re wanting to pay companies to do what they’re already doing. It makes no sense to me at all for us to take billions of dollars and pay utilities for what they’re going to do as the market transitions.”

The reconciliation measure also incentivizes electric vehicle purchases and construction of EV charging stations. It would offer consumer rebates to homeowners who weatherfit their homes; give tax credits to companies building sources of clean energy; charge oil and gas producers for methane leaks; help farmers reduce their carbon footprint and invest in climate research.

Manchin authored an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal earlier this month protesting spending trillions of dollars, citing concerns over inflation and burdening future generations. 

“I, for one, won’t support a $3.5 trillion bill, or anywhere near that level of additional spending, without greater clarity about why Congress chooses to ignore the serious effects inflation and debt have on existing government programs,” Manchin wrote. 

— CBS News’ Alan He contributed to this report.

Read original article here

Arizona Democratic Party passes resolution criticizing Sinema on filibuster, reconciliation

The Arizona state Democratic Party overwhelmingly passed a resolution on Saturday that criticizes Sen. Kyrsten SinemaKyrsten SinemaBudget impasses mark a critical turning point in Biden’s presidency Democrats urge Biden to go all in with agenda in limbo Why Democrats opposing Biden’s tax plan have it wrong MORE (D-Ariz.) for her opposition to eliminating the filibuster to pass legislation key to the party and for her stance on Democrats’ $3.5 trillion reconciliation bill.

The resolution passed in the committee in a 415-99 vote, according to Progress Arizona, an organization that advocates for progressives in the state.

The measure warned Sinema that the state party will “closely watch” her upcoming votes, and if she does not vote for the massive Democratic budget reconciliation package, it will “go officially on record” and “give Senate Sinema a vote of NO CONFIDENCE.”

The Arizona Democratic Party also called on Sinema to support ending the filibuster to allow the passage of voting rights  legislation, including the For the People Act and the John LewisJohn LewisDebt ceiling fight pits corporate America against Republicans House Democrats unveil legislation to curtail presidential power Michelle Obama looks to mobilize voters for midterms MORE Voting Rights Advancement Act. They urged her to nix the filibuster to help pass other “urgent legislation,” including the Protecting the Right to Organize Act, commonly referred to as the PRO Act.

The state party resolution authorizes a possible censure of Sinema if she does not meet the conditions set forth in the letter, adding that could come with “the clear understanding she could potentially lose support of the ADP in 2024.”

“We all are facing a critical crossroads and nothing less than our Democracy is at stake, and as all indicators show Democrats could lose both the House and Senate in 2022 if we do not “deliver the goods” by passing voting rights, healthcare, Medicare expansion, two year free college funding, immigration reform, specifically a path to citizenship for Dreamers, labor rights, green jobs, Climate Emergency /environmental protection legislation and more,” the resolution states.

Sinema previously said she opposes the $3.5 trillion price tag for the Democrats’ package — which includes investments in climate change and education, among other key party initiatives — contending that the topline number is too high.

Democrats are slowly gearing up to possibly vote on the massive package in coming days.

The Hill has reached out to Sinema’s office for comment.

Updated 11:17 p.m.



Read original article here

Trudeau pans Canadian school’s 2019 book-burning ‘reconciliation’ for Indigenous people

A newly revealed 2019 book burning in Canada has politicians and voters up in flames, with many denouncing the act – no matter the “symbolic” intention. 

An Ontario francophone school – a school that mixes English and French lessons – initiated a “purification” ceremony in which it burned around 30 books of “questionable” content for “educational purposes.” Ashes from the burned books were used as fertilizer for a tree. 

The Conseil scolaire catholique Providence, which oversees grade-school education in southwestern Ontario, did not make the ceremony public, but details about the event surfaced during the election campaign for the Indigenous People’s Commission. 

CANADIAN ACADEMIC WON’T USE CAPITAL LETTERS – EXCEPT TO ACKNOWLEDGE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE’S STRUGGLE

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau addressed the controversy during a campaign stop this week, saying, “On a personal level, I would never agree to the burning of books.” 

The prime minister did stress, though, that it is not for non-Indigenous people “to tell Indigenous people how they should feel or act to advance reconciliation.” 

The project extended to thousands of books that were removed from libraries at 30 schools and have either been destroyed or are in the process of being recycled, but only the initial 30 were burned.

FURIOUS CROWD FORCES JUSTIN TRUDEAU TO CANCEL CAMPAIGN EVENT: ‘NEED FREEDOM’

Titles that were burned included “Tintin in America,” “Asterix and the Indians” and three Lucky Luke comic books, as well as novels and encyclopedias, Barrons reported.  

“It was a gesture of reconciliation with the First Nations and a gesture of openness towards other groups represented in the school district and in society,” Lyne Cossette told Radio-Canada, citing works that contained “obsolete and inappropriate content.”

“We regret that we did not intervene to ensure a more appropriate plan for the commemorative ceremony and that it was offensive to some members of the community. We sincerely regret the negative impact of this initiative intended as a gesture of reconciliation,” Cossette wrote.

TRUDEAU MINISTER RAISES EYEBROWS BY CALLING TALIBAN ‘OUR BROTHERS’

Yves-Fran çois Blanchet, leader of the Bloc Québécois, told reporters “we don’t burn books.”

“We expose ourselves to history, we explain it, we demonstrate how society has evolved or must evolve,” he explained. 

Chairperson Suzy Kies resigned Wednesday from her post as the co-chair of the Indigenous People’s Commission due to questions over her indigenous origins and her involvement in the ceremony. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“I refuse to have my story used to harm Justin Trudeau and our party,” Kies said in a statement, according to the Toronto Sun. “This is the reason why I am resigning from my position as co-chair of the Indigenous People’s Commission.”

Reconciliation, the process by which Canada works to acknowledge its troubled past with the First Nations people and works to pay back the people affected by its actions, has taken sharper focus this year after the discovery of hundreds of unmarked graves of indigenous children forced to attend residential schools intended to assimilate them into the Canadian culture in the late 1800s. 

Read original article here

Scoop: Behind Manchin’s $1.5 trillion reconciliation limit

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.V.) has privately warned the White House and congressional leaders that he has specific policy concerns with President Biden’s $3.5 trillion social spending dream — and he’ll support as little as $1 trillion of it — Axios’ Hans Nichols scoops.

  • At most, he’s open to supporting $1.5 trillion, sources familiar with the discussions say.

Why it matters: In a 50-50 Senate, that could mean the ceiling for Biden’s “Build Back Better” agenda — and that many progressive priorities, from universal preschool to free community college, are in danger of dying this Congress.

  • Manchin also has committed to paying for any new spending with new revenue, which will limit the ultimate size of any final package.
  • This amount would be on top of a $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure deal passed by the Senate and awaiting House action.

Between the lines: Underlying Manchin’s concerns with Democrats’ $3.5 trillion budget proposal, which originated in Sen. Bernie Sanders’ budget committee, are deep and substantive differences over the size and scope of specific programs.

  • Manchin has voiced concerns about Biden’s plan to spend $400 billion for home caregivers.
  • He’s also talking about means testing on other key proposals, including extending the enhanced Child Tax Credit, which provides up to an additional $300 per child per month, free community college, universal preschool and child care tax credits.
  • And he’s skeptical that so-called dynamic scoring — which Democrats embraced as a way to offset some costs of hard infrastructure spending — can be applied to “human” or “soft” infrastructure proposals.
  • For years, Republicans have relied on dynamic scoring to argue that tax cuts can pay for themselves in the long run, by growing the economy and therefore increasing revenues.

The big picture: House and Senate committees have until Sept. 15 to write specific legislation on how to spend up to $3.5 trillion — while also finding $1.5 trillion in new revenue from corporations and the wealthiest Americans — to enact Biden’s agenda.

  • Manchin threw cold water on the process last week with a Wall Street Journal op-ed, where he argued for a “strategic pause,” citing inflation and the need to preserve some fiscal headspace to respond to COVID-19, if the virus continues to rampage.
  • House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has promised House centrists a vote on the separate $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure package by Sept. 27.
  • Biden, speaking at the White House Tuesday evening, said, “Joe at the end has always been there.”
  • “He’s always been with me. I think we can work something out. I look forward to speaking with him.”

Flashback: During the negotiations for the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan, Manchin helped force Biden into lowering the amount of unemployment assistance and into raising the income limits on who would receive $1,400 direct payment checks.

What we’re hearing: The White House still appears optimistic that a deal can be reached.

  • Manchin was careful in his WSJ piece not to close the door to future negotiations.
  • “Sanders wanted a large number and Manchin wants a smaller number and we’re going to work this process to try to reach common ground,” said one source familiar with the White House’s thinking. “There is a wide spectrum of opinions in the Democratic caucuses, and plenty of negotiation will take place. But we will continue to get this done, finding common ground.”

Editor’s note: This post has been updated to include comments from President Biden.

Read original article here

House budget reconciliation package funds NASA infrastructure but not lunar lander work

WASHINGTON — The House Science Committee will mark up its portion of a multitrillion-dollar spending bill this week that includes several billion dollars for NASA infrastructure but nothing for lunar lander development.

The House Science Committee is scheduled to meet Sept. 9 to mark up a portion of a $3.5 trillion spending bill being considered under a process known as budget reconciliation. That procedure allows the bill to pass the Senate with a simple majority without the threat of a filibuster.

The committee will allocate $45.51 billion in spending for agencies under its jurisdiction, such as NASA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the National Science Foundation. That will be combined with portions of the bill assigned to other committees into the final version to be considered by the full House.

An updated draft of the bill, dated Sept. 4, offers good and bad news for NASA. It includes $4 billion for “repair, recapitalization, and modernization of physical infrastructure and facilities” across the agency. The bill does not assign amounts to specific projects or centers.

NASA Administrator Bill Nelson had made funding for agency infrastructure a priority in any budget reconciliation package, seeking more than $5 billion earlier this year. “There’s aging infrastructure that is dilapidated,” he told House appropriators in May. “They’ve got holes in the roof where they’re putting together the core of the SLS” at the Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans. Michoud suffered additional damage from Hurricane Ida last month.

However, the draft bill includes nothing for the other priority identified by Nelson, the agency’s Human Landing System (HLS) program. Nelson said in May he wanted $5.4 billion for HLS to allow NASA to select a second company alongside SpaceX to develop and demonstrate a lander capable of transporting astronauts to and from the lunar surface.

The bill, though, is silent on HLS. It does provide NASA with an additional $388 million for climate change research and development, of which $225 million would go to the agency’s aeronautics directorate for sustainable aviation. The remainder would be used for research and modeling, data management and support for wildfire monitoring and emergency response. An additional $7 million would go to NASA cybersecurity.

In an Aug. 19 interview, Nelson said that the budget reconciliation package is one of two avenues NASA is pursuing to obtain the additional funding needed for a second HLS award. The other is the traditional annual appropriations process, although a House appropriations bill passed in July increased spending on HLS by only $150 million above the agency’s request of $1.195 billion.

The Senate has yet to act on either a fiscal year 2022 spending bill or various aspects of the budget reconciliation package. In a speech at the 36th Space Symposium Aug. 24, Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), who is both the ranking member of the appropriations subcommittee that funds NASA as well as a member of the Senate Commerce Committee, said he expected appropriators to mark up a fiscal year 2022 spending bill in late September.

He added in an interview after the speech that the Senate Commerce Committee hasn’t yet determined how it will draft its portions of the budget reconciliation package. “We’re in new territory,” he said, noting that both he and the ranking member of the full committee, Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), asked committee chair Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) to use “a committee process” to provide input on the bill.

The draft bill to be considered by the House Science Committee also includes funding for a NOAA space weather project. It offers $173 million to accelerate development of the Space Weather Follow-On L-1 mission, including “prioritizing an independent launch” of the spacecraft. The spacecraft, designed to monitor space weather conditions from the Earth-sun L-1 Lagrange point 1.5 million kilometers from the Earth, is currently scheduled to launch in 2025 as part of a NASA rideshare mission that includes several NASA space science and planetary science spacecraft.

The bill provides more than $3.4 billion for NSF infrastructure projects, such as major research equipment and construction projects. The bill does not identify any specific projects, which could include a replacement for the Arecibo Observatory radio telescope that collapsed last December or financial support for large ground-based astronomical observatories like the Giant Magellan Telescope or Thirty Meter Telescope. The NSF would get an additional $7.55 billion for research awards, scholarships and fellowships.

The overall fate of the budget reconciliation package remains uncertain. Because no Republican members of the Senate are likely to vote for the bill, all 50 Democrats must vote for it, with Vice President Kamala Harris casting a tiebreaking vote, for it to pass.

However, in a Sept. 2 op-ed in The Wall Street Journal, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) said he would not support a $3.5 trillion bill, citing his concerns about its effects on inflation and the national debt. He called for a “strategic pause” in the development of the bill and reducing its size to “only what America can afford and needs to spend.”

Nelson, in last month’s interview, acknowledged the challenge of getting the budget reconciliation package through a divided Senate. “What’s my guess on a reconciliation bill that you have to have all 50 Democrats voting for in the Senate in order to get it passed?” he asked. “Your guess is as good as mine.”

Read original article here

Harry’s Book Announcement Blindsided Royals and Torpedoes All Hope of Reconciliation

As responses go to learning of a devastating attack on the principles of discretion and buttoned-up restraint that the institution you represent stands for, it was somewhat understated.

“Oh gosh!” is said to have been the response of one of Prince Charles’ aides when told by a tabloid reporter of the news of Prince Harry’s forthcoming memoir as he was attending an official event at which Charles was the guest of honor.

The Sun says it “broke the news” of the book’s publication “to Clarence House aides while Charles was at a reception.”

The Sun says: “It was clear aides had no idea the book was being written or even being announced. One said simply: ‘Oh gosh.’”

The Times also reports on the same rather British reaction by Charles’ staff.

The Sun adds that Harry “scrambled to contact his family only when he knew the story was coming out—just moments before it became public.”

Harry’s official spokesperson appeared to confirm that the royal family had been offered only the briefest of heads-ups about the announcement, telling the Telegraph that Harry was not required to seek the permission of his relatives to write his book and that he had “very recently” spoken to his family about it privately.

A source in Charles’ camp also told the Telegraph they were “surprised” at the news.

The decision of Harry to write a memoir that would spill the beans on his most intimate secrets will put an end to any hopes of reconciliation between Harry and his royal relatives.

There have been concerted attempts in recent months to choreograph a semblance of cordiality between Harry and William in particular, with the brothers photographed chatting together at their grandfather’s funeral and at the unveiling of a statue memorializing their mother. However the revelation that Harry was all the while secretly working on a memoir—the book is said to be nearly finished—is likely to put a end to the always barely credible narrative that Harry and Meghan are truly seeking to build bridges with their family.

A source told the Daily Mail: “I think everyone is just tired of being angry when it comes to those two. They have spent the last 18 months doing everything they promised Her Majesty they wouldn’t do—making a living off their previous lives and status as members of the royal family. It’s depressingly predictable, unfortunately.”

Harry has said he will be donating the proceeds of the book to charity.

The Mail also appeared to have been the subject of a barbed briefing from the palace, quoting royal sources as saying Harry had “never been one to willingly admit” his own fault and instead blamed “everyone except himself and his wife” for the collapse of his family relationships.

Read original article here

McConnell slams reconciliation, set for a ‘hell of a fight’

Sen. Mitch McConnell, the Senate minority leader, said Tuesday that Democrats who are dead set on using reconciliation to pass a sweeping infrastructure package are in for a fight.

McConnell, who was in Kentucky at the time, said the “era of bipartisanship on this stuff is over,” according to the Hill. 

“This is not going to be done on a bipartisan basis,” he said. “This is going to be a hell of a fight over what this country ought to look like in the future and it’s going to unfold here in the next few weeks. I don’t think we’ve had a bigger difference of opinion between the two parties.”

The passage of a larger, multitrillion-dollar bill faces significant hurdles, even if Democrats use a procedural method that requires only a simple majority. It’s far from certain, in an evenly divided Senate, that moderate Democrats will agree to an expansive measure that could swell to as high as $6 trillion.

Members of the Problem Solvers Caucus on Tuesday announced their support of the $973 billion infrastructure deal proposed last month by a bipartisan group of senators. 

Fox News was told the caucus’ decision to approve passed with 75% of the vote, with each party passing 50% in support. The caucus endorsed the infrastructure bill as a stand-alone bill and not tied to any reconciliation package. 

The bipartisan $973 billion deal includes money to build a national network of electric vehicle charging stations, purchase thousands of electric buses and upgrade the electrical grid. It also would spend $55 billion to improve drinking water and wastewater systems and $47 billion in resiliency efforts to tackle climate change.

GET THE FOX NEWS APP

ABC News reported that  Jen Psaki, the White House press secretary, said Tuesday, “There’s a lot of work that needs to happen with Congress, and we expect over the next week there to be a lot of behind the scenes bill writing negotiations discussions on Capitol Hill, long nights, lots of coffee over the course of the next several days. Given that [Senate Majority] Leader [Chuck] Schumer has conveyed that he would like to see both the reconciliation package and the infrastructure bill on the floor in July, and we’re in July now in terms of the president’s priorities.”

Fox News’ Jacqui Heinrich and the Associated Press contributed to this report

Read original article here

Senate Democrats can now pass more bills with 51 votes through budget reconciliation after parliamentarian ruling

Senate Democrats just got some wonky procedural news that has some pretty big implications for President Joe Biden’s agenda.

On Monday night, the Senate parliamentarian — an in-house rules expert — determined that Democrats would be able to do a third budget reconciliation bill this year, a massive development that gives lawmakers more room to pass legislation without Republican support.

Already, Democrats had the ability to do two budget reconciliation bills: one focused on fiscal year 2021 and one focused on fiscal year 2022. Unlike most other bills, budget measures can pass with just 51 votes, instead of 60, which means Democrats are able to usher through the legislation they want if all 50 members of their caucus are onboard. (With the American Rescue Plan, for instance, 50 Democrats were able to approve the $1.9 trillion package as part of the FY2021 budget bill, even though no Republicans backed it.)

“The Parliamentarian has advised that a revised budget resolution may contain budget reconciliation instructions,” said a spokesperson for Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer in a statement. “This confirms the Leader’s interpretation of the Budget Act and allows Democrats additional tools to improve the lives of Americans if Republican obstruction continues.”

With the new decision from the parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, Democrats can now do a third budget reconciliation bill, which means they can push through more ambitious measures as long as they are related to taxing and spending. The decision is based on MacDonough’s interpretation of Section 304 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, which allows lawmakers to revise a budget resolution before the end of the fiscal year that it covers. Given her decision, Democrats can now edit the 2021 budget resolution they already passed, and include instructions for another bill.

Schumer’s spokesperson also noted that “no decisions have been made on a legislative path forward using Section 304 and some parameters still need to be worked out.”

Budget reconciliation has its limits: It can’t be used for policies like voting rights reforms or gun control, but it’s still a helpful tool that Democrats have already leveraged to pass a huge expansion of the child tax credit, enhanced unemployment aid, and another round of stimulus checks.

Democrats now have another opportunity to advance parts of their agenda that Republicans would otherwise block. And the decision to push for a workaround shows how limited Democrats’ other options are to pass their agenda.

Democrats are leaning on budget reconciliation amid disagreements over the filibuster

Democrats’ efforts to get the most they can out of budget reconciliation underscores the political context they are operating in: namely, that they have dwindling options for passing ambitious legislation.

If Democrats eliminated the legislative filibuster, all bills could then pass with 51 votes, instead of 60, removing the need to rely so heavily on budget reconciliation. But although an increasing number of Democrats appear open to at least modifying how the filibuster works, the caucus doesn’t have the votes it needs to eliminate it. Since moderate Sens. Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) have been staunch in their opposition to ending the rule, it seems unlikely to change in the near term, meaning most bills will need 60 votes to pass.

To hit that threshold, Democrats will need to convince 10 Republicans to join them on most measures, an outcome that’s become increasingly unlikely for many of the party’s more ambitious bills. (On coronavirus relief, for example, Republicans’ opening bid was roughly a third of what President Joe Biden had proposed.)

By pushing for a reinterpretation of Section 304, Democrats seemed to be looking for other outlets for passing legislation if those in the caucus who are against eliminating the filibuster don’t budge.

Now they have one extra shot.

Infrastructure could be Democrats’ next budget reconciliation bill

Democrats’ attempts to clear the way for another budget bill also coincide with Biden unveiling a $2 trillion infrastructure and jobs package, along with a proposal to raise the corporate tax rate to 28 percent to pay for it.

The administration is pitching to Democrats and Republicans in Congress alike, but the prospects of getting a bipartisan bill done appear dim. In particular, Republicans are opposed to the tax increases, as well as some of the provisions of Biden’s plan that go beyond roads and bridges.

The parliamentarian’s decision gives more options and chances to use reconciliation to pass their priorities with 51 votes. Biden is expected to soon announce yet another package that deals with child care and health care. Though no final decisions have been made on the process, and how these plans will merge into a budget bill, Democrats could theoretically break Biden’s infrastructure plan and his forthcoming child care and health care plan into two different reconciliation bills — sticking one in the amended 2021 resolution and putting the rest in the 2022 resolution.

There’s another option: Democrats and Republicans could pass a bipartisan infrastructure bill that deals more narrowly with roads and bridges, and then Democrats and the Biden administration put their remaining priorities into a budget reconciliation bill. Relevant House and Senate committees are currently working on a surface transportation reauthorization bill, which comes up every five years.

The five-year reauthorization bills deal pretty narrowly with fixing up roads and bridges, and Republicans on the committees think the reauthorization bill should be worked on and passed in a bipartisan way.

“Our committee unanimously reported legislation to rebuild our nation’s water systems. This proves that infrastructure can and should be done on a bipartisan basis,” Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), the ranking member of the Senate Committee on Environment and Health, said in a recent statement.

However, the White House views its plan as a supplement to whatever Congress does on infrastructure on its own. Biden has proposed $621 billion for spending on the nation’s roads and bridges, rail and public transit, and airports and ports.

“All elements of the plan reflect additional investment on top of existing programs and authorities,” an administration official told Vox. “On transportation infrastructure, the plan includes an additional roughly $600B above the five-year budget baseline, assuming a straight extension of FAST-Act funding levels for surface transportation programs.”

The next few months of negotiations between the White House and Congress will decide a lot about just how big and bold an infrastructure bill will be. But no matter what, budget reconciliation will factor in prominently.



Read original article here

‘I’m not going to get into legislative tactics’: Klain sidesteps reconciliation debate amid infrastructure rollout

The complex budgetary maneuver would permit Senate Democrats to pass Biden’s expansive infrastructure plan with a simple majority in the chamber. But Klain declined Thursday to comment on whether the White House had already determined it would seek to bypass the filibuster, saying he was “not going to get into legislative tactics today.”

“We just launched this plan yesterday,” he said. “Congress is out of session. We’re going to start to bring members down here physically … after this Easter break and talk to Congress — talk to members of the House and Senate, Democrats, Republicans about how they want to move forward. We want to move forward, if it’s at all possible, on a bipartisan basis, and I think there’s some hope for that.”

Biden unveiled his infrastructure plan at an event Wednesday in Pittsburgh, laying out a series of investments in roads, bridges and transit — as well as improved access to clean water, broadband and elder and disability care. The administration has proposed paying for the legislation with a rewrite of the corporate tax code, including raising the amount paid by businesses from 21 percent to 28 percent.

“Look, I think these are national needs. And as the president has said, people have to decide if they’re going to deliver or divide. And we intend to deliver,” Klain said Thursday. “And when I talk to Republicans, I see that they want to deliver, too.”

Republicans in Congress have blasted Biden’s effort to reverse the corporate component of former President Donald Trump’s 2017 tax cuts, and progressive Democrats have complained the administration’s infrastructure plan is not far-reaching enough. But Klain indicated the White House would not be deterred by congressional criticism.

“In the end, let me be clear: The president was elected to do a job,” he said. “And part of that job is to get this country ready to win the future. That’s what he’s going to do.”

Read original article here

Sanders threatens to advance coronavirus stimulus with reconciliation if Republicans refuse support

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., said Sunday that Democrats will move pass a COVID-19 relief package through reconciliation, a special process that allows for a 51-majority vote, rather than the 60 votes normally required to advance legislation, if Republicans do not quickly express support for the $1.9 trillion bill.

Sanders, the incoming chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, said in an appearance on CNN’s “State of the Union” that unlike Republicans who used reconciliation to pass a tax cut bill and attempt to repeal Obamacare, Democrats will use 50 votes in the Senate, plus Vice President Kamala Harris’ tie-breaking vote, to “pass legislation desperately needed by working families in this country right now.”

BERNIE SANDERS ON DEMS GETTING LEGISLATION THROUGH WITH FILIBUSTER: ‘DAMN RIGHT WE WILL’

“If Republicans are willing to work with us to address that crisis, welcome – let’s do it. But what we cannot do is wait weeks and weeks and months to go forward. We’ve got to act now. That’s what the American people want,” Sanders told CNN anchor Dana Bash.

“These are major policy changes, and I criticized Republicans for using reconciliation to give tax breaks to billions to create a situation where large profitable corporations now pay zero in federal income taxes. Yes, I did criticize them for that,” Sanders said. “And if they want to criticize me for helping to feed children who are hungry – or senior citizens who are isolated and alone and don’t have enough food, they can criticize me. I think it’s the appropriate step forward.”

Sanders, a self-described democratic socialist, said the Senate must break through the “old approach” that it could take years to get anything done, arguing that, “we don’t have time to sit around weeks on impeachment and not get vaccines into the arms of people.”

“We can chew bubble gum and walk at the same time. The American people are hurting and they want us to act. That’s what our candidates ran for in this election,” Sanders said, claiming that’s why Democrats narrowly won back the Senate. “That’s what the guys in Georgia won on and we have got to reaffirm the faith in the American people in government that we can respond to their pain.”

Reconciliation provides a fast-track process to consider bills to implement the policy choices embodied in the annual congressional budget resolution. Unlike other bills, reconciliation bills cannot be stalled by a filibuster and only need a simple majority in the Senate, instead of the usual 60-vote supermajority.

BERNIE SANDERS’ MITTENS TREND ON INAUGURATION DAY, TWITTER REACTS: ‘WE WANT TO KEEP WARM’

That means in the currently divided 50-50 Senate, the newly sworn-in Harris would cast the tie-breaking 51st vote to give Democrats the slimmest majority. Special rules have been designed to protect the rights of the minority party.

Sanders has signaled a willingness to pass legislation without GOP support by using this special process that’s reserved for tax and fiscal matters. The first test could be Biden’s $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief legislation that is the first priority for the new Democratic administration.

Biden’s COVID-19 proposal also includes a provision to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour, vaccine funding, money for schools and state and local governments — priorities that may not fit into budget reconciliation rules. Democrats may be required to pick up GOP votes or compromise for a smaller package that has bipartisan support.

During the 115th Congress, Republicans used reconciliation twice to pursue their policy goals, according to a House Committee on the Budget report published in October 2020.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

In the final months of 2017, the House and Senate approved a reconciliation measure to cut taxes mostly for the wealthy and corporations and to eliminate the penalty for not having health insurance. The Congressional Budget Office estimated at the time that the legislation would add $1.5 trillion to federal deficits over 10 years, which has been revised to $1.9 trillion. President Trump signed this legislation into law on Dec. 22, 2017.

Earlier in that same year, Republicans attempted to use reconciliation to dismantle the Affordable Care Act. The House approved a reconciliation measure to repeal major provisions of the health care law and cap federal funding for Medicaid, but the Senate failed to get the needed votes to advance a bill.

Fox News’ Marisa Schultz contributed to this report.

Read original article here