Tag Archives: rebuffed

Trump rebuffed by judge in New York fraud lawsuit, trial date set

NEW YORK, Nov 22 (Reuters) – A New York judge has scheduled an October 2023 trial for former U.S. President Donald Trump, three of his adult children and the Trump Organization in a lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James accusing them of fraudulently overvaluing the real estate company’s assets and Trump’s net worth.

Justice Arthur Engoron of the state Supreme Court in Manhattan set the trial date during a contentious hearing on Tuesday following motions by the Trumps the night before to have the civil lawsuit dismissed.

“I ruled on all these issues. It seems to me the facts are the same. The law is the same. Parties are the same,” Engoron told Alina Habba, Trump’s lawyer. “You can’t keep making the same argument after you’ve already lost.”

Habba had accused the judge of bias. Trump, a Republican, has accused James, a Democrat, of suing him because she dislikes him and his politics.

In her lawsuit filed on Sept. 21, James accused Trump, his company, his children Donald Jr, Eric and Ivanka and others of inflating Trump’s assets by billions of dollars in a decade of lies to banks and insurers. James called the fraud “staggering.”

The complaint seeks $250 million in damages. It also seeks to stop the Trumps from running businesses in the state and ban Trump and his company from acquiring New York real estate for five years.

Engoron is expected to rule on the motions to dismiss by early January. Trump is already appealing Engoron’s order requiring an independent watchdog to monitor his company.

The trial, scheduled for Oct. 2, 2023, and other legal issues could complicate Trump’s campaign, announced last week, for the presidency in 2024.

The Trump Organization is now on trial in another Manhattan courtroom on criminal tax fraud charges.

In addition, U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland last week named a special counsel to oversee two criminal investigations, one related to the FBI’s seizure of government documents from Trump’s Florida home and the other examining Trump’s role in efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

Trump also faces a criminal investigation in Georgia into whether he interfered with the 2020 election results in that state.

He has called these cases and investigations politically motivated, and has labeled Engoron a “puppet judge” for James.

In seeking to dismiss the case filed by James, Trump maintained that the attorney general lacked authority to pursue a lawsuit designed to “get” him when neither the public nor the marketplace was harmed.

“Who stands to gain from this highly-politicized farse [sic], aside from the politically-compromised Attorney General of the State of New York?” Trump’s filing said.

Other defendants also urged dismissals.

Lawyers for Trump’s sons called the lawsuit a “textbook example of throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks.” Ivanka Trump’s lawyers said there were no allegations that she lied to or defrauded anyone.

The Trump Organization’s former longtime Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselberg and its Controller Jeffrey McConney also sought dismissals of claims against them. Both testified as prosecution witnesses in the Manhattan criminal trial in which prosecutors accused the company of engaging in tax fraud spanning 15 years.

Reporting by Karen Freifeld and Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Will Dunham

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Abortion Safety Plan Requests By Female Showrunners Rebuffed By Studios – Deadline

Just a few hours shy of the deadline set in late July by hundreds of top female writers and showrunners on abortion safety protocols, most of Hollywood’s biggest studios and streamers today opted to side step specifics.

In a response letter full of boiler plate remarks on sharing “your concerns around the health, safety and well-being of our dedicated employees and the people who support our productions” and “access to safe and effective health care,” Disney, Netflix, AppleTV+, NBCUniversal, Amazon, Warner Bros Discovery, and AMC Networks essentially ignored the primary points of concern and action that the likes of Shonda Rhimes, Pamela Adlon, Issa Rae, Mindy Kaling, Natasha Lyonne, Angela Kang, Courtney A. Kemp, Elizabeth Meriwether, Robin Thede, Marta Kauffman, Tanya Saracho, Amy Schumer and others put before them individually on July 28.

Following the political and cultural earthquake of Roe v Wade being overturned by the conservative majority Supreme Court on June 24, the industry talent asked studios and streamers to “review of your current abortion safety plan” within 10 business days. That deadline would have been just before midnight tonight LA time. Though Lionsgate was among the companies sent a letter by the showrunners and writers on July 28, the studio was not among those responding Wednesday.

In the tense electoral atmosphere of the upcoming midterms, today’s letter conveyed nothing about ceasing donations to anti-abortion candidates and PACs – which should be a pretty easy call for Blue Hollywood. Despite a reliance on existing union healthcare plans and “continuing to evaluate ways that we can best provide for our employees and workers who support our productions,” the maladroit letter also offered nothing spotlighting matters of privacy, liability indemnification from potential criminal or civil charges, nor “pregnancy complications” and “protocols outlining the scope of medical care” – as had been requested.

What it did put forth was a tin eared “we look forward to working with you to continue to make great content for our audiences around the world” as a closing line in Wednesday’s letter.

“It’s an insult, plain to see,” one signee told Deadline Wednesday after the response correspondence started showing up in people’s inboxes. “It’s indicative of what’s truly important to them, which isn’t us, our safety or rights,” the hyphenated creative added. “I shouldn’t be surprised, I am, but I know I shouldn’t be,” another top tier signatory to the July 28 letter from writers and showrunners bluntly stated of the response she read today.

A number of signatories to the original letter told Deadline tonight that they are discussing more actions that can be taken to stockpile studio and streamer support. Additionally, almost 600 male showrunners and writer who sent an abortion rights letter of their own to “our employers” earlier this month “regarding the imminent crisis.” The “form letter reply,” as one of those male scribes termed it, that their female colleagues received today has seemingly galvanized many of them on further strategies they can attempt. “Hollywood needs to send a message of unwavering support to American women,” one male content creator said. “Abortion banning states need to know that support isn’t just moral, but financial if need be. And if the industry needs to, it needs to walk away from tax credits and production in those states.”

Citing the national hopes springing from the recent defeat in Kansas of a state constitutional amendment to ban abortion altogether, one producer stated that “Hollywood has decided to stay on the sidelines in Georgia, and with Republicans.” The filmmaker said, “this isn’t over, but now we know who our allies are.”

Read the full response letter from the studios and steamers here:

Thank you for your letter of July 28, 2022. We share your concerns around the health, safety and well-being of our dedicated employees and the people who support our productions. We believe they should have access to safe and effective health care, and their privacy should be protected.

Each of our individually designed corporate health plans provides comprehensive health care coverage for our respective employees. We have been independently updating our respective employees – who live and work throughout the country – as plans and policies change and expand to provide reproductive care and other support now needed in states that have restricted or outlawed abortion access.

Most workers on scripted film and TV productions are covered by industry health plans that are jointly administered by union and management trustees under the collective bargaining framework. In partnership with various industry health plan staff and the union trustees on those plans, our management trustees worked swiftly to review existing health benefits, and several of these industry health plans have already adopted amendments providing for reimbursement for travel expenses associated with securing abortion services for participants and their dependents who reside or work in states where such services cannot be lawfully obtained. We understand the other industry health plans will be considering similar changes this month. The participants in the various industry plans have been receiving communications directly from the plans about these amendments.

We are pleased that our industry partners have quickly addressed this important issue and are committed to continuing to evaluate ways that we can best provide for our employees and workers who support our productions.

We want to assure you that we are individually focused on supporting the health, safety, well-being and privacy of our respective employees and those who support our productions as we continue to monitor this evolving situation. We look forward to working with you to continue to make great content for our audiences around the world.

Signed,

AMC Networks, Amazon Studios, Apple TV+, NBCUniversal, Netflix, Paramount, The Walt Disney Company, Warner Bros. Discovery



Read original article here

Koundé deal to Chelsea still on, as Barcelona gazump claims are rebuffed — reports

A bit of a storm in the football “Twitterati” was brewed earlier today due to “late information” that Barcelona were able to gazump Chelsea a second time this summer, by convincing Sevilla defender Jules Koundé to join the Culés instead of the Blues. However reports in Spain from Mundo Deportivo and El Chiringuito — both of which would jump on the claim that almighty Barça, despite its nearly fallen status, are still giants of the sport — say the exact opposite.

Of course stranger things have happened in football. Manchester United certainly did not count on Chelsea overtaking them to take Pedro from Barcelona. Nor did Tottenham back when Willian, medical done and only a couple of days away from photoshoot with pen, paper and all of that jazz, ditched Spurs to move to West London instead. Koundé can very well do the same to us, given Beckham Law and whatever sweet nothings Barça are whispering in their ears while doing everything they can to avoid what can be one of the ugliest falls from grace in sporting history.

Still, worry not as Boehly and co. are proving themselves to be more than able operators of football transfers in spite of this being (in theory) their first rodeo at it. If not Koundé, it will be someone else just as capable or even better than the French international.



Read original article here

Putin Rebuffed U.S. Plans for Bases Near Afghanistan at Summit With Biden

Russian President Vladimir Putin, during a June 16 summit meeting with President Biden, objected to any role for American forces in Central Asian countries, senior U.S. and Russian officials said, undercutting U.S. plans to act against new terrorist dangers after its Afghanistan withdrawal.

The previously unreported exchange between the U.S. and Russian leaders complicated Biden administration hopes of basing drones and other counterterrorism forces in countries bordering landlocked Afghanistan. That challenge has deepened with the collapse over the weekend of the Afghan government and armed forces.

The exchange also indicates that Moscow is more determined to try to maintain Central Asia as a sphere of influence than to expand cooperation with a new American president over the turmoil in Afghanistan, former and current U.S. officials said.

“The Russians have no interest in having the U.S. back in there,” said Paul Goble, a former State Department expert on Eurasia.

The U.S. requirement for what the Pentagon calls an “over-the-horizon” counterterrorism capability in Afghanistan has grown substantially in recent days with the Taliban takeover.

Read original article here

Bezos’ Blue Origin rebuffed in its protest of moon lander contract

A federal agency upheld the decision to make Elon Musk’s SpaceX the sole winner of a contract to develop a lander for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s return to the moon, a setback to Jeff Bezos ’ space enterprise.

The decision Friday by the U.S. Government Accountability Office was in response to protests that an affiliate of Mr. Bezos’ Blue Origin LLC and Dynetics, a unit of Leidos Holdings Inc., filed after NASA in April awarded a $2.9 billion contract to SpaceX for the lander.

A spokeswoman for Blue Origin didn’t respond to a request for comment. Dynetics said it respects the GAO’s decision and plans to compete for other lander opportunities and moon-related work.

This artist’s rendering shows SpaceX’s mega-rocket design on the Earth’s moon. (SpaceX via AP, File)

Mr. Bezos’ Blue Origin is pursuing a broad agenda for space, and winning part of the lander contract was important for the company’s ambitions. Blue Origin’s partners for its lander included Lockheed Martin Corp. and Northrop Grumman Corp.

In a letter sent Monday, Mr. Bezos made a personal appeal to NASA Administrator Bill Nelson regarding the contract, offering to waive up to $2 billion in payments over roughly the next two years and fund another mission of the lander to low-Earth orbit.

VIDEO FROM 2000 SHOWS JEFF BEZOS MOCKED BY FANS FOR DREAMS OF FLYING TO SPACE

Mr. Nelson declined to comment on the letter during a briefing Thursday. He had previously said at a congressional hearing that NASA would seek more funding to support future bids for its lunar landing system. NASA said Friday that the GAO’s decision would allow it to set a timeline with SpaceX for landing astronauts back on the moon for the first time in more than 50 years.

The GAO on Friday said that NASA didn’t violate any procurement laws or rules when it decided to award a single contract for the lander to Space Exploration Technologies Corp., as Mr. Musk’s company is formally called. NASA had opted to go with a single supplier amid budget constraints.

This photo provided by Blue Origin, Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon and space tourism company Blue Origin, exits the Blue Origin’s New Shepard capsule after it parachuted safely down to the launch area with passengers Mark Bezos, Oliver Daemen and Wall (Blue Origin via AP / AP Newsroom)

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE 

Blue Origin and Dynetics filed protests with the GAO over that decision, arguing that the agency was required to make multiple awards. Such protests could have forced NASA to rebid the contract, but the GAO concluded that the space agency was within its rights to choose only SpaceX. A spokesman for SpaceX didn’t respond to a request for comment.

“NASA’s announcement provided that the number of awards the agency would make was subject to the amount of funding available for the program,” the GAO said in a statement. “In addition, the announcement reserved the right to make multiple awards, a single award, or no award at all.”

Mr. Musk reacted to the news by tweeting “GAO” and then a flexed-arm emoji.

Read original article here