Tag Archives: Rarely

Former ‘Friends’ Writer Says Cast “Rarely Had Anything Positive To Say” About Scripts & Why She Suffered From Imposter Syndrome – Deadline

  1. Former ‘Friends’ Writer Says Cast “Rarely Had Anything Positive To Say” About Scripts & Why She Suffered From Imposter Syndrome Deadline
  2. Former ‘Friends’ writer recalls that working on the show was no ‘dream job’ CNN
  3. ‘Friends’ writer claims stars were ‘unhappy’ to be tied to ‘tired old show’: They’d ‘deliberately tank’ jokes Fox News
  4. ‘Friends’ writer trashes life on the show: ‘Sex talk was pervasive’ New York Post
  5. A ‘Friends’ Writer Says The Cast Would Deliberately Tank Good Jokes Pajiba Entertainment News
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Inside NYC’s Grinnell co-op where units rarely list for sale

The Grinnell, a stately co-op in upper Manhattan, might just be the city’s best-kept secret — for now.

Replete with spacious homes, a strong sense of community and maintenance fees that are considerably less than in comparable buildings, the property stands in a sleepy corner of Washington Heights, at 800 Riverside Drive. It also rarely has openings — but house hunters and otherwise property-curious locals now have their best chance in years to become members of this exclusive, and under-the-radar, club.

In this 83-unit structure, where residents typically spend decades, there are now an unprecedented four apartments for sale. When they trade hands, they’ll mark the first sales at the Grinnell since 2020, according to StreetEasy, when only two units sold. In 2019, just three units found new owners.

The Grinnell is home to units with dazzling older-world features — such as this wood-paneled dining room inside a $1.99 million listing for unit GRI.
Hauseit
Unit GRI’s kitchen features restored original oak cabinetry.
Hauseit
Hardwood floors and moldings galore round out the features of unit GRI.
Hauseit

“I don’t recall when [four homes] were on the market at the same time,” said Bruce Robertson, 71, a long-time Grinnell resident. Robertson, also a Compass broker, represents the six-room unit 8H, which listed on Saturday for $1.59 million — its first time up for sale in 45 years. Aptly called a “hidden treasure” in its marketing description, this top-floor spread has three bedrooms, a 23-plus-foot-long great room, a windowed kitchen with the original glass-fronted cabinetry, a formal dining room with wainscoting and views of the George Washington Bridge.

One day later, according to StreetEasy, a two-bedroom spread with one bathroom — and tony touches such as picture moldings — listed for $1 million with RE/MAX Sparrow Realty.

Among the other availabilities: Unit GRI, an eight-room duplex, which now asks $1.99 million after listing for $2.2 million in April. It boasts three bedrooms and two full bathrooms. Features include French doors, a wood-paneled dining room, original oak floors and cabinetry, and mirrored mahogany doors. (Instead of a traditional listing, this home — represented by Hauseit — is an assisted for-sale-by-owner offering.)

There’s even unit 2A — a 1,800-square-foot three-bedroom with French doors, crown moldings, and bonus spaces including a library, a foyer, a maid’s room and a pantry. It listed in September for $1.35 million — and is represented by Jamella Swift of Keller Williams NYC.

The light-filled unit 2A, listed for $1.35 million, has French doors.
Keller Williams NYC
Unit 2A also has wainscoting and chic molding details.
Keller Williams NYC

Occupying a full triangle-shaped block between 157th and 158th streets — and Riverside Drive and Edward Morgan Place — the Grinnell offers homes of a bygone New York era. The smallest apartment has five rooms and measures 1,100 square feet; the largest has more than 10 rooms and spans 2,700 square feet. Built in 1911 and designed by architects Schwartz & Gross, it’s a history-rich standout with a Mediterranean-style façade, a porte-cochere entryway to an interior courtyard — and other classic interior details including hardwood floors, leaded glass transoms and 10-foot ceilings. Amenities include a gym, a bike room and a rooftop terrace.

Apart from the grande-dame glamour and million-dollar asking prices, many New Yorkers don’t know it’s a Housing Development Fund Corporation (HDFC) co-op — meaning it’s part of the city’s affordable housing stock and subject to certain income restrictions for home purchases. It’s one of the most successful co-ops of its kind, and that “has worked well to maintain the Grinnell’s large infrastructure over the years,” said Robertson.

That said, the Grinnell is the uptown early-20th century apartment building fit for savvy New York royalty who, with the proper income requirements, can act now to get a coveted deal. It’s no surprise residents end up staying put.

The Grinnell stands on a full triangle-shaped block on Riverside Drive in Washington Heights.
Stefano Giovannini
The mighty building commands views in all directions, this one looking north over West 158th Street.
Stefano Giovannini
The Grinnell dates to 1911.
Stefano Giovannini

“People who purchase in the Grinnell don’t move because it’s a wonderful place to live,” said Robertson, who’s also a former member of the building’s board and has sold 10 units in the building over the years.

Robertson has lived in a two-bedroom, one-bathroom spread with his wife, also a real estate broker, for the past 22 years. They found the apartment on a whim after getting priced out of their Upper East Side condo and immediately knew the building was special. He loves the south-facing windows, bright light, solid construction, high ceilings, hardwood floors and the quiet.

“All in all, it’s hard to encapsulate how the Grinnell is so special and how that came to be. Mostly because it truly is a community of cohesive residents, many families who’ve grown, now being replaced by young families, who care about each other,” Robertson said. “We don’t always agree about issues facing any 102-year-old landmarked building of its size and scope. But we work through them and are proud of a beautiful structure that looks and feels like living in a castle, in a bucolic-feeling area with wonderful neighbors in other comparable buildings.”

Robertson has sold nearly a number of units in the Grinnell over the years.
Stefano Giovannini
Robertson is also a 22-year resident of the building.
Stefano Giovannini
A virtually staged image of unit 8H, which Robertson represents.
Tina Gallo Photography

Other long-time residents agree it’s a building with a lovely spirit.

Bruce Kanze, 74, an adjunct lecturer at the nearby City College of New York, moved to the Grinnell in December 1977 and lived in apartment 3B. He moved to 8F in March 1982, an eight-room, two-bedroom, two-bathroom apartment, with his wife and three kids, where he’s lived ever since.

“There’s a sense of belonging to a community, and we love our neighbors,” Kanze said. He recalled fond memories of climbing the mulberry tree in front of the building and picking berries with his daughters, of setting up summer lemonade stands with them — and of crab fests with the neighbors. “We’d buy bushels and cover the tables with paper bags and see who had the highest pile of crab shells,” he added.

But another reason why people stay so long in the Grinnell is because of its HDFC title. It’s one of 1,100 HDFC co-ops in the city, where residents are shareholders and own the building collectively. The status dates to 1982 when residents successfully bought the Grinnell from the city after a campaign that included the slogan, “Buildings for People, Not for Profit.” Apart from the tony interiors and like-minded community, part of the conditions for ownership include a flip tax, which also keeps residents put. The funds from it go towards the building’s capital reserve.

Unit 8H, on the top floor, also has great exposure to light, in addition to handsome hardwood floors and moldings.
Stefano Giovannini
The kitchen inside unit 8H.
Tina Gallo Photography
The wood-paneled dining room inside 8H.
Stefano Giovannini
8H has northwest views of the George Washington Bridge.
Stefano Giovannini

In addition to the income restrictions, a real-estate tax abatement makes the maintenance less than other co-ops of comparable size and stature. By contrast, a four-room, 2,000-square-foot apartment at 116 Pinehurst Ave. will set you back $1.58 million with $3,400 a month in maintenance. Similarly, a three-bedroom co-op in the century-old Riviera across West 157th Street from the Grinnell is going for $1.79 million with $2,174 a month in maintenance. Robertson’s $1.59 million listing, for instance, has $1,448 per month in maintenance. Both unit GRI and 2A have $1,450 monthly fees, StreetEasy shows.

Wayne Benjamin, 64, an architect who bought a 1,300-square foot, two-bedroom co-op in the Grinnell in 1987 for just $85,000 — about $228,000 today — has no plans to go anywhere. He enjoys cooking in his full-sized kitchen and listening to music on his vinyl record player — or jazz on an old-fashioned FM radio with a pair of speakers. He also enjoys rare New York City cross-ventilation, as every room in the apartment has exposures — so he can open the dining room windows, which face the courtyard, and the French doors and windows in the living room across the hallway, which face the street, and enjoy breezes year-round.

But in the end, it’s the people.

“It comes down to what’s important,” Benjamin said about the pull the Grinnell has keeping him there. “There are things that you share in common with others — common concerns and interests that you come together to address. That is what creates the sense of community that can make a building or neighborhood a vibrant wonderful place to live.”

Read original article here

YouTube’s Dislike Button Rarely Shifts Recommendations, Researchers Say – The New York Times

  1. YouTube’s Dislike Button Rarely Shifts Recommendations, Researchers Say The New York Times
  2. YouTube’s ‘Dislike’ Button Doesn’t Do What You Think WIRED
  3. YouTube’s ‘dislike’ barely works, according to new study on recommendations Engadget
  4. YouTube’s ‘dislike’ and ‘not interested’ options don’t do much for your recommendations, study says TechCrunch
  5. Turns out YouTube doesn’t really care that you dislike a video Android Authority
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Why experts rarely speak of “curing” cancer anymore

There’s never been a better time to be hopeful about cancer. There’s never been a moment when both preventing and treating different kinds of cancers has been more possible. And with more and more of us now experiencing what look like actual, honest-to-God cures, it’s time to retire the concept of “the cure for cancer.”

“An unprecedented 100% of rectal cancer patients in a small immunotherapy clinical tria had their cancer disappear after immunotherapy.”

Last fall, Cleveland Clinic launched a vaccine clinical trial with the eventual goal of heading off triple-negative breast cancer in high risk patients. In late May, City of Hope cancer care and research center in Los Angeles and Australian biotech company Imugene announced their first first clinical trial using a cancer-killing virus in patients with advanced tumors. And then, earlier this week, there came astonishing news out of Memorial Sloan Kettering — an unprecedented 100% of rectal cancer patients in a small immunotherapy clinical trial had their cancer “disappear after immunotherapy — without the need for the standard treatments of radiation, surgery, or chemotherapy” — a trinity so horrendous to endure they’re known to patients as “slash, burn and poison.”

Is the longed for cure we’ve been waiting for right around the corner, then? Unfortunately, it’s not that simple — because cancer is anything but simple.

“The cure” is a phrase that is fortunately less common than it was back in the 1969, when cancer researcher Sidney Farber took out a full page ad in the Washington Post issuing a challenge to the president; “Mr. Nixon: You can cure cancer,” the ad read. Just a decade ago, the New York Times asked, “Is the Cure for Cancer Inside You?” 

Though the rhetoric has become more nuanced since, the phrase refuses to go away entirely. There are initiatives like the Susan G. Komen “Race for the Cure” and Wacoal’s “Fit for the Cure.” There are biopharmaceutical companies making sketchy claims about a “universal cancer cure.” And there are casual headlines in mainstream media outlets, like The Telegraph’s recent musing about whether “the cure for cancer” is in your gut. When the Biden administration ambitiously declared earlier this year the relaunch of the Cancer Moonshot plan to “end cancer as we know it,” they at least amended the goal to add a few words about “improving the experience of living with and surviving cancer.”


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


I sometimes cautiously describe myself as cured. After receiving a rapidly fatal diagnosis of metastatic melanoma and entering an innovative immunotherapy clinical trial, I have not presented any evidence of disease in ten years. But I’m careful to try to make clear that my cure was not the cure.

Cancer isn’t one thing. It’s over one hundred things, over one hundred variations on a theme of uncontrolled cell growth, all with their own particular expressions. There are four types of breast cancer, four types of melanoma. As Dr. Jonathan Chernoff, Chief Scientific Officer at Fox Chase Cancer Center, has explained, “It turns out cancer is a general term. There are lots of different kinds of cancer in different tissues that act in different ways. They’re not all caused by the same mutations and they’re not all going to respond to the same type of treatment.”

Genetic variations in all of us make each cancer its own unique experience. Some treatments work well for some people, and other people not at all. I didn’t have the right BRAF mutation for vemurafenib, a treatment that was approved by the FDA mere days before I was diagnosed at Stage 4. Is vemurafenib an effective treatment for a specific type of cancer? Yes. Would anybody call it “the cure” for cancer? Of course not. 

RELATED: Take it from a lab rat — you don’t have to fear “unapproved” vaccines

Along with the truly thrilling prospect of more people being able to say they had, past tense, cancer, and even more never getting it in the first place, there needs to be space for thinking beyond all-or-nothing. Cures are great; I should know. And advancements in one form of cancer can often signal hope for treatments for others. Immunotherapy, for example, used be the dark horse of oncology. Today it’s an approved protocol for dozens of cancers, with clinical trials for even more — just like that promising rectal cancer trial out of MSKCC — chugging along right now. There have been incredible recent breakthroughs even in deadly cancers like pancreatic.

But those breakthroughs will continue to be, for the foreseeable future, very tailored propositions. As a researcher once helpfully explained to me, you’re not going to get a sweeping cure-all like penicillin for something as complex and variable as cancer. Frankly, the idea of lots of effective possibilities and treatments, instead of one magic bullet for the second leading cause of death in the US, is pretty amazing.

As we continue to make advancements in eradicating cancer, we can also make space for living with it. For certain patients, cancer is no longer a death sentence but merely a condition they can abide with. Some people’s tumors simply cannot be eradicated entirely. For them, the phrase “halting the progression” can be just as beautiful, and offer just as long and bright a future, as “cured.” Given the often invasive and arduous nature of treatment and the toll it can take on the human body and psyche, the goal of a spotless scan may be far less meaningful than a healthy overall quality of life anyway.

“Future cancer therapeutics will not win through a simple cancer-killing strategy,” the authors of a 2020 paper in the journal Cancers wrote. Instead, “We would likely benefit more patients overall by transforming cancer into a manageable chronic disease, rather than solely focusing on finding a complete cure ‘Holy Grail.'”

This is a line of thinking worth adopting, even for those of us outside of the research world. It would mean that a diagnosis wouldn’t come with a presumptive assumption we’re “battling” cancer. It would mean that one small word wouldn’t get to be the umbrella term for such a complex experience. It would mean, at this breathtaking time in science, shifting the narrative from a war on a single enemy to a story of incredible hope, for millions more living, breathing human beings.  

More of Salon’s coverage of the quest for cures: 

Read original article here

Covid-19 Immunity Wanes, but Third Shot Still Rarely Needed, BioNTech CEO Says

BERLIN—Immunity against the coronavirus is waning in people who were fully vaccinated with the shot made by BioNTech SE and Pfizer Inc. in January because of the rapidly spreading Delta variant, BioNTech’s chief executive said, confirming data that emerged from Israel last week.

But even as antibody levels are dropping seven months after immunization among some vaccine recipients, most of them will remain protected against severe disease and might not yet need a third dose, according to Ugur Sahin, CEO of the German company that invented the vaccine and partnered with Pfizer to develop the product for the global market.

“The antibody titers are going down,” Dr. Sahin said, referring to the unit of measurement for antibodies against the virus. “The vaccine protection against the new variant is considerably lower.”

Dr. Sahin made the comments after preliminary data emerged from Israel showing that people who had received the shot in January were three times more likely to get infected than those who were vaccinated in May.

U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said at a White House briefing on Thursday that vaccines offer a high degree of protection against infection, serious illness and death from the Delta variant.

Read original article here

Elon Musk Bragged About Tesla And Did What He Rarely Does: Delete A Tweet

Tesla shares declined as much as 4.6% in late morning trading Friday. (File)

Does Tesla Inc. have the potential to be a $1 trillion company? It’s a notion that got Elon Musk tweeting early Friday, only for the billionaire to do something fairly rare for him: delete a post.

The exchange started with a tweet by an account that regularly features promotional posts about Tesla and “Full Self-Driving,” a package the company sells along with its driver-assistance system Autopilot. The suite of features often referred to as FSD is controversial because of Tesla’s mixed messaging — the company tells drivers who use it that they need to be fully attentive.

“FSD is the biggest thing ever,” the user @WholeMarsBlog wrote. “Tesla is going to be bigger than Apple.”

Musk, Tesla’s chief executive officer, replied that he thinks there is “a >0% chance Tesla could be the biggest company.” After another user wrote that they loved “the direction of that arrow,” Musk responded: “Probably within a few months.”

Musk then quickly deleted the latter post. It’s unclear if he thought better of sending it or was asked to take the tweet down.

Tesla shares declined as much as 4.6% in late morning trading Friday. The stock was down 3.7% as of 12:55 p.m. in New York.

As part of a settlement reached with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in 2018 related to Musk’s tweets about taking the company private, Tesla agreed to employ a securities lawyer to review executives’ social media posts and make sure they’re consistent with disclosure policies and procedures. Tesla also agreed to oversee communications by Musk, specifically, and to pre-approve anything containing information material to the company or shareholders.

Hours before Friday’s exchange, the National Labor Relations Board ruled that Tesla repeatedly violated U.S. labor law and needed to make Musk delete a tweet in which he threatened to punish workers if they unionized. He has not yet taken down that post.

With a roughly $600 billion market capitalization, Tesla has a long way to go to pass Apple Inc. as the world’s biggest company. The iPhone maker’s market value is about $2 trillion.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)



Read original article here

Van Gogh’s rarely seen ‘Street Scene in Montmartre’ painting exhibited ahead of auction

A rare painting by Dutch impressionist master Vincent van Gogh of a street scene in the Parisian neighborhood of Montmartre will be publicly displayed for the first time before its auction next month.

Sotheby’s auction house said the work, painted in 1887, has remained in the same family collection for more than 100 years — out of the public eye.

It will be exhibited next month in Amsterdam, Hong Kong and Paris ahead of an auction scheduled on March 25 in the French capital.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR LIFESTYLE NEWSLETTER

“It’s an important painting in the oeuvre of Vincent van Gogh because it dates from the period in which he’s living in Paris with his brother, Theo,” Etienne Hellman, senior director of Impressionist and Modern Art at Sotheby’s, told the Associated Press.

Van Gogh moved to Paris in 1886 and lived in Montmartre. He left the capital in 1888 for southern France, where he lived until his death in 1890.

“Before this, his paintings are much darker… In Paris he discovers color,” Hellman said. “Color blows up into the painting.”

Sotheby’s personnel display « Scene de rue à Montmartre » (Street scene in Montmartre), a painting by Dutch master Vincent van Gogh at Sotheby’s auction house in Paris, Thursday, Feb. 25, 2021.  (AP Photo/Christophe Ena)

“Street Scene in Montmartre” depicts a windmill named the Pepper Mill, seen from the street under a bright sky, with a man, a women and a little girl walking in front of wooden palisades that surrounded the place.

“Paris marks this period where… the major impressionists influence his work,” Hellman said.

Sotheby’s said the painting has been published in seven catalogues before but has never been exhibited.

Claudia Mercier, auctioneer of Mirabaud Mercier house, said, “it is also an important painting because there are very, very few of them remaining in private hands… especially from that period, most are in museums now.”

FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK FOR MORE FOX LIFESTYLE NEWS

Sotheby’s has estimated the painting’s value between 5 and 8 million euros (between $6.1 and $9.8 million). It which did not reveal the identity of the owner.

It will be on display in Amsterdam on March 1-3, Hong-King on March 9-12 and Paris on March 16-23.

The Pepper Mill was destroyed during the construction of an avenue in 1911, but two similar windmills are still present today on the Montmartre hill.

Read original article here

Rarely seen Van Gogh painting exhibited ahead of auction

PARIS (AP) — A rare painting by Dutch impressionist master Vincent van Gogh of a street scene in the Parisian neighborhood of Montmartre will be publicly displayed for the first time before its auction next month.

Sotheby’s auction house said the work, painted in 1887, has remained in the same family collection for more than 100 years — out of the public eye.

It will be exhibited next month in Amsterdam, Hong Kong and Paris ahead of an auction scheduled on March 25 in the French capital.

“It’s an important painting in the oeuvre of Vincent van Gogh because it dates from the period in which he’s living in Paris with his brother, Theo,” Etienne Hellman, senior director of Impressionist and Modern Art at Sotheby’s, told the Associated Press.

Van Gogh moved to Paris in 1886 and lived in Montmartre. He left the capital in 1888 for southern France, where he lived until his death in 1890.

“Before this, his paintings are much darker… In Paris he discovers color,” Hellman said. “Color blows up into the painting.”

“Street Scene in Montmartre” depicts a windmill named the Pepper Mill, seen from the street under a bright sky, with a man, a women and a little girl walking in front of wooden palisades that surrounded the place.

More Entertainment Stories:

“Paris marks this period where… the major impressionists influence his work,” Hellman said.

Sotheby’s said the painting has been published in seven catalogues before but has never been exhibited.

Claudia Mercier, auctioneer of Mirabaud Mercier house, said “it is also an important painting because there are very, very few of them remaining in private hands… especially from that period, most are in museums now.”

Sotheby’s has estimated the painting’s value between 5 and 8 million euros (between $6.1 and $9.8 million). It which did not reveal the identity of the owner.

It will be on display in Amsterdam on March 1-3, Hong-King on March 9-12 and Paris on March 16-23.

The Pepper Mill was destroyed during the construction of an avenue in 1911, but two similar windmills are still present today on the Montmartre hill.

Read original article here