Tag Archives: raising

Hulu Is Raising Its Prices Again Oct. 8

Photo: Jenny Kane (AP)

Less than one year after Hulu jacked up the price of its Hulu with Live TV subscription package, the streaming service is preparing to put another dent in customers’ wallets by raising prices once again.

Beginning on Oct. 8, anyone who subscribes to one of Hulu’s on-demand plans, Hulu and Hulu with No Ads, will be subjected to a $1 increase, TechCrunch reports, which more or less sounds like a pittance when you recall that the price of Hulu’s Live TV bundles increased by a whopping $10 apiece last year. What that means in practice is that the ad-supported version of Hulu will now cost $7 per month, up from $6, while Hulu with No Ads will cost $13 per month, up from $12.

Thankfully, Hulu’s Live TV bundles have not been subject to any price hikes this year, probably because making them any more expensive would further erode what little artifice is left to the idea that cutting the cord is in any way cheaper than buying a cable package.

Notably, the planned price hikes also won’t affect any plan where Hulu is bundled with Disney+. Disney—which assumed full ownership of Hulu in 2019 after it bought out Comcast’s stake—is likely doing this on purpose in order to incentivize customers who don’t require live TV to shell out for a package that includes its own flagship streaming product. The package that combines Hulu with Disney+ and ESPN+, for example, costs $14 per month—just $1 more than Hulu with No Ads will cost after the price hike goes into effect next month.

In its third-quarter earnings report last month, Disney announced that while Hulu still trails Disney+ in subscribers, it actually leads in average monthly revenue per user. Hulu’s subscription on-demand video service has also grown to 39.1 million subscribers, per the report, and its Live TV option, which bundles its live and linear programming, has 3.7 million subscribers, leading to a grand total of 42.8 million total subscribers—up 21% year-over-year.

Read original article here

Texas G.O.P. Passes Election Bill, Raising Voting Barriers Even Higher

HOUSTON — The Republican-controlled Texas Legislature on Tuesday passed a major bill overhauling the state’s elections, overcoming a six-week walkout by Democrats to cement Texas as one of the most difficult states in the country in which to vote.

The voting restrictions were a capstone victory in Republicans’ national push to tighten voting rules and alter the administration of elections in the wake of false claims about the integrity of the 2020 presidential contest. Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, is expected to sign the bill.

The bill takes aim in particular at Harris County, a growing Democratic bastion that includes Houston and is the nation’s third most populous county. The legislation forbids balloting methods that the county introduced last year to make voting easier during the pandemic, including drive-through polling places and 24-hour voting, as well as temporary voting locations.

It also bars election officials from sending voters unsolicited absentee ballot applications and from promoting the use of vote by mail. The bill greatly empowers partisan poll watchers, creates new criminal and civil penalties for poll workers and erects new barriers for those looking to help voters who need assistance, such as with translations. It requires large Texas counties — where Democrats perform better — to provide livestreaming video at ballot-counting locations.

Including Texas, 18 states across the country have passed more than 30 bills this year restricting voting, one of the greatest contractions of access to the ballot since the Voting Rights Act was passed in 1965. The relentless pace of these voting laws has raised pressure on Democrats in Congress, where a stalemate in a narrowly divided Senate has left them with little hope of passing federal voting legislation that would combat the new restrictions.

Texas, a state with booming urban areas and demographic trends that have long been seen as favoring Democrats, already had some of the nation’s tallest barriers to casting a ballot. It has closed hundreds of polling locations since the Supreme Court gutted a key part of the Voting Rights Act in 2013, according to a report by the nonpartisan Leadership Conference Education Fund. The state already has one of the strictest voter identification laws in the country and does not permit no-excuse absentee voting by mail for voters younger than 65.

Democrats, voting rights groups and civil rights leaders had furiously opposed the Texas bill, arguing that its impact would fall disproportionately on Black and Latino voters. To delay passage, more than 50 Democratic members of the State House fled the state for Washington in July, denying Republicans the necessary numbers to hold a vote. The move drew national attention and support from President Biden and Senate Democrats, whom the Texas lawmakers urged to pass federal legislation protecting voting rights.

“We knew we wouldn’t be able to hold off this day forever,” Representative Chris Turner, the chairman of the House Democratic caucus, said in a statement on Tuesday. “Now that it has come, we need the U.S. Senate to act immediately.”

The voting bill is not the only conservative measure being considered in the Texas capital. The ongoing special session, which followed a notably conservative regular legislative session earlier this year, contains a raft of proposed legislation that is possibly even more contentious.

The list of bills — revived by Mr. Abbott, who faces re-election next year and, for the first time in his 25-year career in elected office, serious primary challenges from fellow Republicans — features priorities of the G.O.P.’s most staunch supporters. The measures include more money for a wall along the border with Mexico, stricter rules on how Texas schools teach about race, bans on receiving abortion drugs by mail and restrictions on transgender athletes in competitions.

The Legislature is also weighing a measure to pre-empt local worker protection ordinances, an effort that would deepen the battle lines between the Republican-dominated state government and Democratic officials in Texas cities.

The passage of the election bill came after an unusually bitter and unpredictable several months in the Texas Capitol.

After the Democratic House members left the state, Mr. Abbott called two special sessions, one after the other. The Republican speaker of the House, Dade Phelan, issued civil warrants for the lawmakers’ arrest. Democrats took refuge first outside Texas and then, when some returned, furtively within their homes or in “undisclosed locations” in the state.

Over time, attention waned and many Democrats wavered. The first 30-day special session expired in early August without any vote. The second one started immediately after and Democrats hunkered down, mostly in Texas, meeting daily via videoconference to try to hold their ranks together. Some trickled in, but not enough to allow Republicans to hold a vote.

Then, on Aug. 19, three Democratic members from Houston surprised their colleagues by showing up together on the House floor at the State Capitol. The move paved the way for Republicans to establish a quorum, and set off a round of finger-pointing and backbiting among Democrats in the state.

That the bill had been delayed as long as it had — the walkout lasted 38 days in all — surprised many in Austin. It raised the national profiles of the Democrats who took to Washington to call for federal voting rights legislation, their only real hope of countering the Republican measures in Texas.

Some Republican members of the Legislature called on Texas citizens and others to help track down the absent Democrats. And outside groups offered money — as much as $2,500 in one case — for information leading to the Democrats, worrying those members that some vigilante might take the law into his or her own hands.

In the end, Republican leaders in the state opted to wait out their Democratic colleagues rather than making arrests — as some more fiery lawmakers called for — to establish a quorum.

The walkout ended as others have in Texas over the years, with Democrats returning to Austin to watch as bills they vociferously opposed passed the Legislature with little of their input.

On Friday, the House passed the bill on a nearly party-line vote of 80 to 41. The Senate had previously passed its version of the bill, but because the House made some revisions to the Senate bill, it was sent back to the Senate for the author of the bill, State Senator Bryan Hughes, a Republican, to concur.

Mr. Hughes agreed to all of the changes but one: He opposed a Republican-introduced amendment that could have helped Crystal Mason and other Texans who were prosecuted for voting. They had voted after being released from prison, unaware that they were ineligible.

A conference committee of the House and Senate removed the amendment. Both chambers of the legislature passed the final version of the bill on Tuesday.

But the noise made by Democrats, and the national media focus they drew to Texas, did appear to alter at least some measures that had prompted voting rights advocates to view the initial bills as the most restrictive in the country. The final version did not contain limits on Sunday voting hours — seen as an attempt to target “souls to the polls” events at Black churches — or provisions that made overturning elections easier.

It also expanded weekday early voting by one hour and added a provision allowing voters to fix problems with absentee ballots.

Even so, passage of the legislation was a stark demonstration of the political dominance of Texas by Republicans, who hope to hold onto the levers of power in the country’s largest red state. More than 20 Democrats kept up their protest on Tuesday, remaining absent from the House.

“You largely did what you wanted in this bill,” Representative Senfronia Thompson, a Houston Democrat, told her Republican colleagues in the State House before the previous vote on the bill on Friday. “This is your bill. Your idea. And you will be responsible for the consequences.”

Representative Andrew Murr, the Republican sponsor in the House, defended the legislation on Friday, in a voice nearly hoarse from hours of debate. “We want Texans to be confident in the outcome of the system,” he said. “We all strive for improvement, and I believe that that is what we are looking at today with this legislation, is improving the election code in Texas.”

Read original article here

Kate Hudson opens up about raising kids with different dads

Kate Hudson has learned a thing or two about co-parenting thanks to her three kids and their dads.

She recently opened up about her complex family dynamics, including with her own mom, Goldie Hawn, in a conversation with TODAY’s Willie Geist, aired Sunday.

“I’ve got multiple dads, I’ve got kids all over the place,” she said, laughing.

The “How To Lose a Guy in 10 Days” star, 41, shares son Ryder, 17, with ex-husband Chris Robinson, and son Bingham, 9, with ex-fiancé Matt Bellamy. She also welcomed a daughter, Rani Rose, with boyfriend Danny Fujikawa in 2018.

“The only expectations I really have that are really high on my life is with my kids and with family stuff,” she continued to Willie. “Other than that, it’s like, I just let it go. … I work my a– off, and then I walk away, and I hope for the best.”

But Hudson’s also found staying at home with her family due to the COVID-19 epidemic challenging at times.

“I wanna be, like, ‘Yeah, it’s so great and … we’re figuring out,’ but the reality is that there are days that are great, and there’s days that I have to remind myself to be grateful,” the Fabletics co-founder explained. “I never thought in a million years that I’d spend a year in one place. And when you have so many kids, sometimes you have those moments where you’re hiding in your bathroom going, ‘Please, please, get me out of here!'”

“I just remind myself there’s a lot of people out there who have lost their loved ones, and we just gotta stay in for a bit,” she added.

Although Hudson has close relationships with her own kids, she grew up not knowing her own father, musician and actor Bill Hudson. She and her brother, actor Oliver Hudson, were raised by Hawn and her longtime partner, Kurt Russell.

“I think that estrangement is unfortunately quite common,” she told Willie. “I think it’s important for people to talk about that. If they can’t reconnect or if it’s too challenging, that it’s OK, right?

“It’s a 41-year-old issue,” she continued, referring to her own father. “I have a great family. I have a beautiful mother. I have a stepfather who stepped in and played a huge, huge part in sharing what it is to have a dependable father figure in our life. But it doesn’t take away from the fact that we didn’t know our dad.

“I think as I’ve sort of gone through that process … I kind of look at my dad and I’m, like, ‘You know, the love has never ever gone anywhere. It’s always been there, no matter what those complications have been. And healing is … personal, and I think people sometimes just need to hear that they’re not alone in that.”

Hudson often reflects on these issues in her podcast, “Sibling Revelry,” which she hosts with her brother Oliver Hudson. But long before she became a prominent podcaster, she had her first major success with the 2000 cult classic film “Almost Famous.”

“It was definitely a whirlwind,” she recalled. “It was almost like that year of my life was — people would ask me all the time, ‘How does it feel? How does it feel?’ Everything was happening so fast in that moment … and I didn’t even have time to digest any of it. And then my life, it was just work, work, work.”

“From the outside, it might not have seemed as grounded as it actually was,” she continued. “But yeah, I mean, shot out of the cannon is basically what it was.”

Some 20 years later, the Golden Globe winner is starring in the upcoming film “Music,” which comes out in February and tells the story of a drug dealer, played by Hudson, who becomes the caretaker of her teenage half sister, who has autism. It’s directed by pop musician Sia.

“We call it a musical experience,” Hudson said. “I think it’s a piece of art. I mean, that’s what Sia’s intention was. Her intention was to make a movie about love, about finding love, about feeling worthy of love.”

She’s now at work filming the second season Apple TV+ drama “Truth Be Told” opposite Oscar winner Octavia Spencer, and the safety protocols due to the coronavirus are “very strict,” including masks and face shields, she said.

“I was looking at us the other day with all of our s— on, and I’m, like, ‘God, we’re nuts,'” she quipped. “Like, we’re shooting a show in the middle of a pandemic, and so happy to be at work.”

Read original article here

Russian-backed mercenaries dig fortified trench across Libya, raising US concern over Kremlin motives

US officials are also concerned over the long-term goals of the Kremlin ally in the war-torn state. One intelligence official notes that the trench is a sign that Wagner, which, the official said, has its largest global presence in Libya, is “settling in for the long haul.”

The trench, which extends dozens of kilometers south from the populated coastal areas around Sirte towards the Wagner-controlled stronghold of al-Jufra, can be seen on satellite imagery and is bolstered by a series of elaborate fortifications.

CNN has contacted the Russian government for comment and received no response.

This recent conflict has claimed more than 2,000 lives, according to UN data, and shattered an oil-rich, strategically vital Mediterranean state. An October peace deal, brokered by the United Nations, was meant to see all foreign forces leave the country by January 23, one of a number of confidence-building measures.

The trench and fortifications appear designed to impede or stop a land attack on LNA controlled areas in the east, running through the populated coastal areas of Libya that have seen the most clashes since the 2011 fall of the regime of Moammar Gadhafi.

The GNA have posted images of excavators and trucks creating the ditch and berm that runs alongside it and said that work appeared ongoing as recently as this month.

The trench, the US intelligence official said, is another reason “we see no intent or movement by either Turkish or Russian forces to abide by the UN-brokered agreement. This has the potential to derail an already fragile peace process and ceasefire. It will be a really difficult year ahead.”

Open-source monitoring says it has mapped a series of more than 30 defensive positions dug into the desert and hillsides that stretch for about 70 kilometres.

Satellite imagery from Maxar, seems to show both the trench stretching along a main road, and the fortifications dug, also by Wagner mercenaries and their contractors.

Images show a build-up of defenses around the Jufra airbase, and also the Brak airfield further south, where apparent radar defenses have been installed and fortified.

Salaheddin Al-Namroush GNA Defense Minister, said to CNN: “I don’t think anyone digging a trench today and making these reinforcements is leaving anytime soon.”

Claudia Gazzini, from the International Crisis Group, told CNN the trench was “indeed worrying,” and that talk of it “has been circulating between diplomats for the past few weeks. It is ongoing and would suggest Moscow is keen to cement its presence in Libya.”

Analysts have said the Kremlin is keen to boost its military presence and influence in the Mediterranean, along NATO’s southern underbelly, with the added bonus of involvement in and profit from Libya’s oil industry.

Gazzini added there were repeated reports that both sides continued to maintain and build a presence of foreign mercenaries, with the GNA also accused of boosting its supplies of military equipment, under a public deal with Turkey to support its armed forces.

The US intelligence official said the number of mercenaries on both the GNA and LNA sides was relatively consistent: An estimated 10,000 were in currently Libya, according to a September AFRICOM report on the issue.

The Libyan deployment of about 2,000 Wagner foreign mercenaries — thought to be mostly Russian or former Soviet Union nationals — is the private military company’s largest worldwide, the US official said.

A spokesman for the LNA, Major General Khaled al-Mahjoub, confirmed the existence of the trenches to CNN, but described them as “temporary” sand barriers and trenches, in “an open area… for defense and fighting.” He denied the presence of 2,000 Wagner mercenaries, and said there were consultants “announced a long time ago.”

But, a confidential UN report in June, obtained by CNN described the Wagner fighters as “an effective force multiplier.”

Last year, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that there were no Russians in Libya, but if there are they are not representing Russia. Russia has always denied it uses mercenaries to fight for it.

Despite an arms embargo, UN inspectors recorded dozens of Russian flights into Libya throughout 2020.

The US Africa Command publicly called Russia out for the expansion, saying it was similar to actions in Syria.

In June, the head of the defense committee in the upper house of the Russian parliament, Viktor Bondarev, said the US claim was “stupidity” and suggested they were old Soviet planes from somewhere else in Africa.

A western diplomat with knowledge of arms movements into Libya said Russian flights into the country had dropped from their peak of 93 in August down to just over a dozen monthly at the end of 2020.” They’re just sustaining on the ground,” he said, adding that Turkey was flying in similar numbers.

Turkey’s military is open about its desire for a permanent presence, posting images of its military giving the GNA “Base Defence Training” in the past week.

“It’s a comprehensive effort,” said the US official. “They’re constructing facilities, bringing in personnel and equipment. They’ve got the HAWK air defense missile batteries, 3D [KALAKAN] radar.”

Satellite imagery of the al-Khoms port shows minor modifications that suggest it may be being readied for a longer-term Turkish naval presence, which the GNA’s al-Namroush has denied.

A senior Turkish security official told CNN they “continue to offer military training, cooperation and advice…according to the GNA’s needs and demands.”

The thousands of Syrian mercenaries that Turkey has flown into and supported in Libya have been used elsewhere too, the US intelligence official revealed. During Turkey’s support for the Azerbaijani government during their recent conflict with Armenia, planes carried hundreds of Syrian mercenaries to Azerbaijan, to assist Turkey’s ally in their war with Armenia, the US official said.

“It did appear that there was some movement of some of the Syrian mercenary forces in the direction of the conflict in [Nagorno Karabakh]. Smaller numbers, in the lower hundreds,” the official added.

The Russian-backed Wagner forces are intended to provide Moscow with influence but not liability, analysts said. Jalel Harchaoui, a senior fellow at the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime, said Wagner mercenary forces were “by definition disposable” — and a “force that does not exist, according to the official version of the Russian state. It doesn’t mean it’s not formidable, fearsome and fairly effective,” but that it provides the greatest flexibility for the Kremlin.

Gazzini added: “Russian policy in Libya is opaque — what Russia wants to do. From evidence on the ground, it sounds like they want to consolidate their influence, or want to find a way out.”

Yet the US official added the Russian build-up amounted now to significant personnel and advanced equipment, but one that presented ethical concerns. “Fourth generation fighter jets and Pantsir missile systems are being operated by a less capable, poorly-trained Wagner mercenaries,” the official said.

“There are complex challenges in Libya, including al Qaeda and ISIS, and mercenaries with their poor level of training, experience, and lack of respect for human rights and international law, make those weapons systems in those hands the most concerning.”

While the Wagner presence and trench seems to convey an advantage for the LNA’s head General Haftar, the Russian presence seems more geared to Moscow’s agenda, than the support of Haftar, analysts said.

The Western diplomat said Haftar needed a continued conflict in Libya to maintain relevance. “He becomes irrelevant overnight if the conflict finishes,” said the diplomat. “And it if does not finish on his terms he becomes vulnerable to war crimes allegations etcetera.”

Read original article here