Tag Archives: push

Hurt by Lockdowns, California’s Small Businesses Push to Recall Newsom

Small businesses across the country have suffered from shutdowns that sometimes seem to flare up as suddenly as surges in the coronavirus itself. Restaurants, gyms, corner stores and spas have closed, some after trying to hang in there for months.

The pain in California has been acute. Nearly 40,000 small businesses had closed in the state by September — more than in any other state since the pandemic began, according to a report compiled by Yelp. Half had shut permanently, according to the report, far more than the 6,400 that had closed permanently in New York.

Few of the pandemic choices that Mr. Newsom has faced have been easy. California has suffered enormously from Covid-19, with more than 3.5 million cases and 47,000 deaths. Los Angeles County, one of the hardest-hit places in the recent virus surge, has more than 1.2 million cases and 19,000 deaths.

Dan Newman, a political strategist for Mr. Newsom, said the governor was focused on coronavirus vaccinations and reopening the state. Mr. Newman blamed “state and national G.O.P. partisans” for supporting “this Republican recall scheme in hopes of creating an expensive, distracting and destructive circus.”

Acknowledging that the pandemic has “heavily impacted our small businesses,” the director of the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development, Dee Dee Myers, pointed to several state programs that offer them help. They include the California Small Business Covid-19 Relief Grant Program, the California Rebuilding Fund and the Main Street Hiring Tax Credit.

Ronna McDaniel, chairwoman of the Republican National Committee, said in a statement that Mr. Newsom had “proven that he is woefully unqualified to lead the state of California.”

In places such as Los Angeles County, where Mr. Newsom won 72 percent of the vote in 2018, and neighboring Orange County, a more conservative area, the small-business anger is particularly intense. One local business owner leading the movement to open California’s economy is Andrew Gruel, 40, a chef who owns Slapfish, a seafood restaurant chain.

Read original article here

Power companies begin forced outages as bitter temperatures push electric infrastructure to the limit

Around midday Monday, area residents began to report that their power was turned off amid brutally cold temperatures. Subzero temperatures and extremely cold wind chills continued Monday, with record lows likely Tuesday morning.Omaha Public Power District President Tim Burke told KETV that forced outages, affecting those served by the Southwest Power Pool, were planned to last about an hour. OPPD, LES, NPPD are all served by the Southwest Power Pool.The Southwest Power Pool reported on Twitter: “After declaring an Energy Emergency Alert Level 3 at 10:08 a.m. this morning, and after exhausting all other options to ensure the continued reliability of the regional grid, SPP is directing member utilities to implement controlled interruptions of service effective immediately.”Officials say this is happening because there is not enough power available to keep up with customer demand and that this type of demand reduction is only used as a last resort to preserve the reliability of the electric grid. Burke said around noon they started outages in Bellevue and the power was returned around 1 p.m. Residents in La Vista reported losing power for about 30 minutes at 1 p.m.This is the first time OPPD has had to resort to this measure. Burke asks that customers don’t panic, saying they will “load shed” for an hour at a time in different parts of the customer area. This won’t affect hospitals, jails, other critical industries. He said officials will not be able to give a warning to customers to let them know if their power will be affected. Officials called the event “unprecedented.””It’s a last resort that we understand puts a burden on our member utilities and the customers they serve, but it’s a step we’re consciously taking to prevent circumstances from getting worse, which could result in uncontrolled outages of even greater magnitude,” chief operating officer Lanny Nickell said. Burke said a big part of the problem is a lack of wind, which is affecting supply.The Omaha Public Power District asked customers Sunday to add blankets and lower the thermostat as subzero temperatures push electrical infrastructure to the limit across much of the Central United States.“These prolonged, frigid temperatures are increasing demand for energy across our service territory and for our partner utilities,” said Tim Burke, president and CEO of OPPD in a news release. OPPD is part of the Southwest Power Pool, which asked all members to begin energy conservation at 11:59 p.m. Sunday. SPP declared an Energy Emergency Alert to balance the high demand for electricity.OPPD said customers can help by lowering the thermostat, and dressing more warmly in the house. Customers should also make sure the fireplace damper is closed when not in use.A release from the utility offered options for those looking to help:What should I do?If you are healthy enough to do so, turn down your thermostat by 3 degrees. (Note: Older adults may want to raise the thermostat to prevent hypothermia).To help stay warm, wear a sweater or other layers of clothing.Close the fireplace damper when not in use to avoid losing heat through the chimney.Leave curtains, blinds and/or shades open in direct sunlight to warm the room and close them at night to prevent heat loss through the windows.To avoid frozen pipes, allow heat to circulate around meters and pipes located near outside walls, in uninsulated cabinets or other enclosed areas.Where previous freeze-ups have been a problem, a slight trickle of water from the faucet may keep a pipe from freezing.PROTECT YOURSELF DURING A POWER OUTAGE:Keep freezers and refrigerators closed.Have phones charged and batteries available.Use a generator, but ONLY outdoors and away from windows.Do not use a gas stove and ovens to heat your home.Disconnect appliances and electronics to avoid damage from electrical surges.Have alternate plans for refrigerating medicines or using power-dependent medical devices.If safe, go to an alternate location for heat or cooling. Be a good neighbor. Check on the welfare of others.Read more here

Around midday Monday, area residents began to report that their power was turned off amid brutally cold temperatures.

Subzero temperatures and extremely cold wind chills continued Monday, with record lows likely Tuesday morning.

Omaha Public Power District President Tim Burke told KETV that forced outages, affecting those served by the Southwest Power Pool, were planned to last about an hour. OPPD, LES, NPPD are all served by the Southwest Power Pool.

The Southwest Power Pool reported on Twitter: “After declaring an Energy Emergency Alert Level 3 at 10:08 a.m. this morning, and after exhausting all other options to ensure the continued reliability of the regional grid, SPP is directing member utilities to implement controlled interruptions of service effective immediately.”

Officials say this is happening because there is not enough power available to keep up with customer demand and that this type of demand reduction is only used as a last resort to preserve the reliability of the electric grid.

Burke said around noon they started outages in Bellevue and the power was returned around 1 p.m. Residents in La Vista reported losing power for about 30 minutes at 1 p.m.

This is the first time OPPD has had to resort to this measure. Burke asks that customers don’t panic, saying they will “load shed” for an hour at a time in different parts of the customer area. This won’t affect hospitals, jails, other critical industries.

He said officials will not be able to give a warning to customers to let them know if their power will be affected.

Officials called the event “unprecedented.”

“It’s a last resort that we understand puts a burden on our member utilities and the customers they serve, but it’s a step we’re consciously taking to prevent circumstances from getting worse, which could result in uncontrolled outages of even greater magnitude,” chief operating officer Lanny Nickell said.

Burke said a big part of the problem is a lack of wind, which is affecting supply.

The Omaha Public Power District asked customers Sunday to add blankets and lower the thermostat as subzero temperatures push electrical infrastructure to the limit across much of the Central United States.

“These prolonged, frigid temperatures are increasing demand for energy across our service territory and for our partner utilities,” said Tim Burke, president and CEO of OPPD in a news release.

OPPD is part of the Southwest Power Pool, which asked all members to begin energy conservation at 11:59 p.m. Sunday. SPP declared an Energy Emergency Alert to balance the high demand for electricity.

OPPD said customers can help by lowering the thermostat, and dressing more warmly in the house. Customers should also make sure the fireplace damper is closed when not in use.

    A release from the utility offered options for those looking to help:
    What should I do?
    • If you are healthy enough to do so, turn down your thermostat by 3 degrees. (Note: Older adults may want to raise the thermostat to prevent hypothermia).
    • To help stay warm, wear a sweater or other layers of clothing.
    • Close the fireplace damper when not in use to avoid losing heat through the chimney.
    • Leave curtains, blinds and/or shades open in direct sunlight to warm the room and close them at night to prevent heat loss through the windows.
    • To avoid frozen pipes, allow heat to circulate around meters and pipes located near outside walls, in uninsulated cabinets or other enclosed areas.
    • Where previous freeze-ups have been a problem, a slight trickle of water from the faucet may keep a pipe from freezing.

PROTECT YOURSELF DURING A POWER OUTAGE:

  • Keep freezers and refrigerators closed.
  • Have phones charged and batteries available.
  • Use a generator, but ONLY outdoors and away from windows.
  • Do not use a gas stove and ovens to heat your home.
  • Disconnect appliances and electronics to avoid damage from electrical surges.
  • Have alternate plans for refrigerating medicines or using power-dependent medical devices.
  • If safe, go to an alternate location for heat or cooling.
  • Be a good neighbor. Check on the welfare of others.

Read more here



Read original article here

Biden administration wants MLB to push back season a month

MLB owners aren’t alone in wanting the season pushed back a month. The federal government would like to see that happen as well.

According to The Athletic, members of President Biden’s administration recently told owners they would like the season pushed back a month so players could get vaccinated by then.

However, the Players Association opted out of that discussion, not wanting to be pressured into a delay. Barring a COVID-19-outbreak, the season will start on time after the union rejected MLB’s proposal for a 154-game season that starts late. The union has scheduled a later call with government officials without MLB’s involvement.

The expected introduction of another vaccine, this one from Johnson & Johnson, was behind the government’s reasoning. The Athletic reported that MLB did not tell the Players Association details of the meeting, but did inform team presidents.

Joe Biden attends a Phillies game on Oct. 16, 2010
MLB via Getty Images

It doesn’t seem to matter at this point. The season, at least for now, is expected to begin on time. 

Read original article here

Prosecutors push to rearrest Kyle Rittenhouse. Here’s how the case has unfolded since he posted bail

Wisconsin prosecutors Wednesday asked to issue an arrest warrant for Rittenhouse, stating he violated his bail agreement by not disclosing his address after his release. Rittenhouse’s legal team has countered with the need to keep his location secret due to claims of death threats against him.

Much attention has been directed at Rittenhouse’s case proceedings, particularly as a cause célèbre among right-wing circles. His supporters welcomed the news on November 20 that he left jail after an apparent fundraising effort met the $2 million required.

Now, where he awaits trial is in question.

Rittenhouse faces allegations in Kenosha, Wisconsin, relating to the shooting deaths of Anthony Huber and Joseph Rosenbaum and the wounding of Gaige Grosskreutz. Rittenhouse’s attorneys have maintained that he acted in self-defense.
Rittenhouse left the scene shortly after the August 25 shootings and returned home to Antioch, Illinois, where he was arrested the following day.
On October 30, he was extradited from Illinois to Wisconsin. The following week, his bond was set at $2 million due to the court considering him a “flight risk,” according to Kenosha County Commissioner Loren Keating.
Rittenhouse was released November 20 after the $2 million bail was posted by Lin Wood, chairman and CEO of #FightBack, according to the Kenosha County Sheriff’s Department.
Wood said in a tweet that Mike Lindell, CEO of My Pillow, Inc., and others helped raise the funds needed for Rittenhouse.

“God bless ALL who donated to help #FightBack raise required $2M cash bail. Special thanks to Actor Ricky Schroder @rickyshroder1 & Mike Lindell @realMikeLindell for putting us over the top. Kyle is SAFE. Thanks to ALL who helped this boy,” read the tweet.

On December 3, Rittenhouse attended a preliminary hearing remotely via video conference with Mark Richards, his attorney. Richards accused prosecutors during the hearing of presenting “a one-sided, stilted view” of events that night. The court determined that Rittenhouse would stand trial.

At a January 5 arraignment, Rittenhouse pleaded not guilty to two felony counts of homicide and a felony count of attempted homicide, among other charges. He attended virtually via Zoom.

State requests for further restrictions

Less than two hours after his arraignment, Rittenhouse, now 18, was seen at a local bar with his mother, an outing confirmed by surveillance video, according to prosecutors.

In a motion filed to modify the terms of Rittenhouse’s bond conditions, prosecutors said Rittenhouse was seen with other people flashing “the ‘OK’ sign, which has been co-opted as a sign of ‘white power’ by known white supremacist groups,” and was “directly served a beer by the bartender.”

In Wisconsin, it is legal for someone under 21 to possess and consume alcohol if a parent is present. Rittenhouse cannot legally consume alcohol in public in his home state, Illinois.

Prosecutors also requested that Rittenhouse be prohibited from “publicly displaying symbols and gestures that are associated with violent white supremacist groups and from associating with known members of those groups, particularly the Proud Boys.”

Attorney Richards stated in a filing that Rittenhouse had never been a member of the groups listed and did not object to the new conditions regarding alcohol, White supremacist hand signals and group affiliation.

The latest developments Wednesday have prosecutors petitioning for an arrest warrant for Rittenhouse, as stated in a court motion that he “violated the conditions of his bond by failing to update his address in writing with the Court within 48 hours of moving.” A bond increase of $200,000 is also being pursued.

Attorney John Pierce, who was part of Rittenhouse’s defense team until mid-January, signed an affidavit filed Wednesday saying due to numerous death threats, “arrangements were made for the Rittenhouse family to reside at a ‘Safe House’ in an unidentified location” once bail was posted.

Rittenhouse is due back in court on March 10, with jury selection set to begin March 29.

CNN’s Omar Jimenez, Joe Sutton, Brad Parks, Artemis Moshtaghian, Kay Jones and Ray Sanchez contributed to this report.

Read original article here

Lawmakers push Biden to offer recurring $2,000 stimulus checks

As Congress debates President Joe Biden’s request for $1.9 trillion in coronavirus relief funding — including a third stimulus check pegged at $1,400 — some Democratic lawmakers are pushing for an even bigger response: $2,000 monthly payments until the pandemic is history. 

Rep. Ilhan Omar, a Democrat from Minnesota, and more than 50 other House members are urging the Biden administration to back such a policy, according to a signed letter sent to Mr. Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris. Signers of the January 28 letter also include other leading House progressives such as Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan.

“One more check is not enough during this public health and economic crisis,” they wrote. “Many families cannot afford to wait for eight months between payments. To truly build back better, families need stability and certainty through ongoing relief — they cannot be at the mercy of congressional gridlock.”

A recurring stimulus check is a familiar proposal for Harris, who last year introduced a bill in the Senate that would have provided $2,000 a month for each adult and child in the U.S. until the pandemic ended, although the effort failed to gain traction. 

Supporters of the idea note that financial hardship remains widespread around the U.S. 10 months after COVID-19 effectively shuttered the economy. A new analysis from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a liberal-leaning think tank, found that one-third of adults are struggling to pay their bills. Many of those who are hurting are low-wage workers whose service jobs were impacted by the crisis, such as those in restaurant and retail jobs.

While the letter didn’t specify an amount for a recurring stimulus payment, Rep. Omar tweeted on Thursday that she would like to see payments of $2,000 per month until the global health crisis has ended. So far, the federal government’s response efforts have included two direct payments to most low- and middle-class families: a $1,200 check for eligible adults last spring and a $600 per person check earlier this month. 

The recurring payments should be directed to “those who need it most and will spend it the quickest,” as well as include “all immigrant workers, refugees, and their families,” Omar wrote. Older dependents and people over the age of 16 who are claimed as dependents — and who were excluded from the first two stimulus checks — should also be included, she added.

“Economic suffering”

The latest relief plan under debate in Congress would provide a third stimulus check of $1,400 to most U.S. households, with Wall Street analysts estimating that the payments could be approved by the end of March.

Given ongoing hardship and high unemployment rates, a bold stimulus plan is needed to both alleviate current suffering and plant the seeds for economic revival, said Gene Sperling, former director of the National Economic Council under President Clinton and President Obama, on a conference call with reporters on Thursday. 

“We know there is still an enormous amount of economic suffering going on in our country,” Sperling said on the call hosted by Invest in America Action, an advocacy group for public investment. “The top quartile might see unemployment around 5%, but for the bottom quartile, it’s over 20%.”

For people in the bottom fifth of income-earners, unemployment remains at “Depression-level” rates, he added.


U.S. unemployment claims fell last week

04:53

Asked about Omar’s request for recurring stimulus payments, Sperling noted that Biden’s $1.9 trillion proposal includes several recurring aid programs, including $400 in extra weekly jobless benefits and an increase in tax credits to $3,600 per child under 6-years-old. There’s some discussion that such a child tax credit could be paid on a monthly basis, he added. 

Some economists have argued that direct stimulus checks aren’t as effective in boosting economic growth as other forms of aid, such as unemployment benefits and food stamps, which are provided to people in need and are spent relatively quickly. The effectiveness of the second round of checks has been mixed, with lower-income households spending the money quickly, while wealthier households socked away the cash, a recent study found. 

Ongoing payments would provide stability to families struggling in the crisis, Omar wrote. “Recurring direct payments until the economy recovers will help ensure that people can meet their basic needs, provide racially equitable solutions and shorten the length of the recession,” she said.



Read original article here

Patriots, Bill Belichick should push for Deshaun Watson

When this whole Deshaun Watson sweepstakes idea started in early January, the beginnings were modest.

In the seemingly unlikely event that Watson would push his way out of Houston, logic was dictated by which teams had the right draft ammunition and salary-cap space. The Miami Dolphins were a natural fit. So too were the New York Jets, who had lost out on their dream of landing Trevor Lawrence. And if you were willing to get outside the box, you could envision a team like the San Francisco 49ers, who appear hellbent on upgrading the quarterback spot and can suddenly create a nice cap surplus by offloading Jimmy Garoppolo. These were sensible destinations. As the weeks have rolled on, we’ve begun to float toward fantasy trade island.

Now as January comes to a close, we’re officially beached there under a coconut tree — with half the NFL being touted as a Hey, Maybe landing spot. The formula has been simple: If there’s even mild discontent at the quarterback spot, that franchise is now entered into the Deshaun Watson qualifier race. Hell, even the Arizona Cardinals (“Kyler Murray is from Texas!”) and Green Bay Packers (“Aaron Rodgers isn’t happy!”) are being entered into the increasingly crowded field of Wild West speculation.

And why not? If you’re an NFL team without a top-10 quarterback or a budding star of your own, you should probably be interested in Watson. Whether you have the ability to make it happen is another story. The vast majority of teams being speculated don’t. And to emerge from the field of have-nots, you really need to blow an offer into the stratosphere.

There is one team in the highly unlikely crowd of contenders that should consider blowing up the obvious destinations with an overwhelming offer. Regardless if the move is out of character for this particular team or would prove costlier than the head coach is usually comfortable with, it’s worth one franchise really pressing forward and trying to upend this whole thing.

The New England Patriots. It’s a team that has far longer odds than what Las Vegas would probably put on any Watson pursuit.

It’s not hard to stack up why it could never work. The team’s 15th overall pick in the 2021 draft isn’t remotely close to what several other contenders can offer. And from an overachievement standpoint, the Patriots are the kind of team that will likely always be selecting players in the lower half of drafts, sheerly driven by the coaching and culture Bill Belichick has instilled. That doesn’t bode well when a team is weighing New England’s picks in an offer. And the draft compensation also doesn’t take into account that Belichick may not love the idea of paying any quarterback a steep deal — even Watson’s five-year, post-trade average of $29.3 million per year, which is very economical for his considerable skills.

If it all ended there, the Patriots would already be in bad shape in the Watson trade talks. But it doesn’t. There’s behind-the-scenes beef between Patriots ownership and All-Pro NFL Svengali Jack Easterby, who has become an infamous executive inside the Texans and seems to be lurking under the fingernails of virtually everything that team owner Cal McNair reaches for. Even with former Patriots personnel man Nick Caserio potentially being amenable to working out a deal with the Patriots, it’s highly unlikely Easterby wouldn’t work to kill the possibility. We also can’t ignore that Watson didn’t seem to enjoy his time under former coach Bill O’Brien, leaving the possibility that he’d never want to go play for O’Brien’s close friend Belichick, even with Belichick having immense respect for Watson’s talent.

It was a rough go for Bill Belichick in the post Tom Brady era in New England. (AP Photo/Elise Amendola, FIle)

Taken altogether, that’s not just a formidable bucket of cold water thrown on a Patriots pursuit of Watson — it’s a tsunami of icebergs washing away fantasy trade island. That doesn’t mean Belichick shouldn’t make the call.

Dealing for Garoppolo will undoubtedly be cheaper. Drafting Mac Jones will be less of a cap hit. And maybe fishing around for some other unforeseen option will produce a surprise. But Belichick turns 69 in April. The compound in Nantucket and relaxing afternoons on his fishing boat can’t be confined to the summer break forever. And if we didn’t learn it in 2020, we’ll never learn it: You can’t compete or even rebuild anymore with middling quarterbacks. Another hopeful veteran reclamation is asking for another Cam Newton disappointment, punctuated this season when the elite QBs dominated the conference title games.

And lest we forget, Tom Brady’s week is coming up. If there was ever a week to feel motivated to resolve the quarterback spot in New England, this is it. Oh, and probably next season, too, given that it appears Brady and his new Tampa Bay Buccaneers family is committed to 2021 as well.

While it wouldn’t be Belichick’s style to be driven to make a personnel move based on the post-Patriots success of Brady, it absolutely would be his style to recognize Watson for what he is. And that’s a brand of special that makes him a top-five quarterback. Belichick himself has said it in the past, making comments similar to those that endeared him to Newton when Newton was at his best.

“Deshaun’s a very talented player — certainly one of the top players in the league at his position that we’ve faced,” Belchick said on a conference call with Houston before facing Watson and the Texans in 2019. “[He] does a great job on the deep ball, has very good touch and accuracy, is a good decision maker — obviously very athletic kid that can do a lot. … He’s a very good passer. [He] can extend plays and make throws out of pocket, make throws in the pocket. And if he has to run the ball to convert a third down, he is certainly capable of doing that.”

Belichick’s praise of Watson doesn’t mean everything, of course. He compliments good players all the time who he’d never try to acquire in a frenzied trade market. And Watson doesn’t fit the bargain shopping that Belichick likes to engage in. But every once in a while, if a player is special, Belichick will go outside his habitual structure and reach for a difference-making talent. He did it for Stephon Gilmore, when the price tag in free agency was as high as it could be. He did it for Antonio Brown, when the chemistry risk was through the roof. And he did it for Darrelle Revis when it was a rental situation that made sense inside the championship window. All of which shows that there are acquisitions for all seasons, even with someone who tends to play it close to the vest more than most.

Belichick’s history of incoming trades is one of yielding fairly good results for very reasonable draft compensation. Guys like Randy Moss, Wes Welker and Aqib Talib were basically bargains in terms of the draft picks surrendered. If anything, Belichick has shown a far more significant propensity to send players away for high picks than to bring them in. But with someone like Watson on the board, this could be an exception.

We’d be remiss to forget the Patriots have spent some serious draft picks for someone special. It just wasn’t a player. It was Belichick himself — for a league-stimulated first-, fourth- and seventh-round picks, which is probably one of the greatest deals in NFL history, let alone the Patriots franchise. Twenty-one years later this month, there’s an opportunity on the table to at least make the call for what would immediately slot as the second greatest deal in Patriots history. Maybe it would take a blowout deal, including a multitude of first-round picks and maybe a few probing young players. Maybe it would take a call to Watson himself, in hopes that he would waive his no-trade clause to go play for another coach who has some hallmarks of O’Brien when it comes to making football more of a job than a fun career endeavor.

It might be a low percentage shot that requires more than New England is willing or capable of surrendering. But if 2020 taught the franchise anything, it’s that special comes around only once in a long, long time at quarterback. Letting it go can be as costly as watching it flourish in the Super Bowl only one year later. And there’s no better way to respond to that new piece of information than by taking a shot that might set the franchise’s future in place long enough to move it past Tom Brady, rather than fumbling for years beneath the shadow he’ll cast for years to come.

More from Yahoo Sports:

Originally published

Read original article here

Michigan athletes push back on shutdown after COVID variant found

Several Michigan athletes are speaking out on Monday against the school’s decision to suspend all athletic activities for 14 days after multiple athletes tested positive for a new “super-spreader strain” of COVID-19.

At least five athletes tested positive for the B.1.1.7 variant of the coronavirus, and at least 15 more are presumed positive. The strain was reportedly introduced at the school by an athlete who is originally from the United Kingdom.

All members of the athletic department were ordered to quarantine up to Feb. 7. The decision to shut down was recommended by the Michigan Department of Human Health Services.

Michigan athletes push back against shutdown

Michigan senior wrestler Myles Amine shared a lengthy statement on Twitter on Monday morning from a “coalition of student-athletes” urging the school to rescind the shutdown order.

It’s not clear who or how many Wolverines athletes are in that “coalition.”

“While we, the student-athletes at the University of Michigan, understand the severity of this virus and take it very seriously, we believe that this mandate from the MDHHS is unnecessary and should not only be reconsidered, but overturned,” the statement read, in part.

The students argued that instead of shutting everything down, the athletic department should simply quarantine teams on a case-by-case basis.

“Based on the department’s testing policies, placing healthy students in quarantine is unnecessary and excessive,” the statement said, in part. “Placing the entirety of student-athletes in a mandated quarantine, instead of working it on a team by team basis, is unfair to the athletes who have followed all protocols necessary to compete and have had no contact with the confirmed cases. These student-athletes have gone above and beyond in order to earn the right to have a season in the midst of a pandemic.”

The B.1.1.7 variant of the coronavirus was first detected in the United Kingdom, and is believed to have emerged last September. It has since spread across the globe and is believed to be approximately 50 percent more transmissible than the standard form of the coronavirus. Some officials have even called it a “super-spreader strain.”

The variant had reached at least 24 states in the United States as of Monday night, per the CDC, and there are currently 13 new cases in Washtenaw County, according to the Detroit Free Press.

While it’s understandable that these athletes are frustrated with the decision, a widespread outbreak of the B.1.1.7 variant in the Ann Arbor area could quickly wreak havoc on the community and the rest of the state — more than the initial strain of the coronavirus already has.

By suspending all athletic activities, the athletic department and the state are clearly hoping that they can curtail any massive outbreak of the new strain before it begins. Whether that works, or they stick to that plan, remains to be seen.

More from Yahoo Sports:

Read original article here

Biden’s COVID testing push calls for more supplies and rapid tests

CLOSE

At-home testing could transform the fight against the novel coronavirus.

USA TODAY

President Joe Biden seeks to reset the nation’s inconsistent coronavirus testing efforts with a $50 billion plan and more federal oversight.

Biden’s plan calls for a newly-created Pandemic Testing Board to coordinate a “clear, unified approach,” to testing for COVID-19, a marked difference from the Trump administration’s policy of states establishing their own plans with federal support.

Laboratories have ramped up production to more than 2 million tests each day, but stubborn problems persist. Some labs still struggle to complete timely tests – particularly when demand surges – due to shortages of critical supplies.

Public health labs largely are not equipped to detect new coronavirus variants such as ones first identified in the United Kingdom and South Africa. And there’s still debate among testing experts on whether wider use of cheaper but less sensitive rapid tests will be the smartest path out of the pandemic.

Biden on Thursday issued a flurry of executive orders, from mask mandates on federal property to reopening schools and accelerating vaccine shipments. Fixing the nation’s disparate testing system “will be the most challenging,” of all, said Marcus Plescia, chief medical officer of the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials.

Former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Tom Frieden said Biden’s testing initiative fits with his broader, science-based plan to curb a pandemic that’s already killed more than 400,000 Americans.

“This is a really challenging pandemic to deal with,” said Frieden, president and CEO of Resolve to Save Lives, an initiative of Vital Strategies. “Important as executive orders are, they are only the start of a major effort.”

US to rejoin WHO:Biden administration renewed support for World Health Organization is ‘good news for America and the world,’ scientists say

Fauci unleashed:He says it’s ‘liberating’ that he can ‘let the science speak’ as adviser to Biden

Calling a national testing strategy the “cornerstone to reducing the spread of COVID,” the Biden’s plan calls for more rapid antigen tests, supplies, lab capacity and genomic sequencing to keep better track of hotspots and new variants.

There’s also tidbits for consumers. One executive order requires federal agencies clarify insurers’ obligation to cover testing, even for people who have no symptoms. For those without health insurance, testing will be free, the order states.

Just as important as a national testing plan is the president’s call for better data reporting and a willingness to level with the American public, Frieden said.  

“President Biden has been very clear: We’re in it together,” he said.  “It’s going to get worse before it gets better. These are all hard truths and important facts that need to be shared and lived. And they have been ignored for a year.”

‘Make a big difference’

The plan calls for federal agencies to use a wartime Defense Production Act to fix persistent shortages of testing and vaccine supplies, as well as protective equipment like gowns, gloves and N95 masks. 

When labs run out of critical supplies such as chemical reagents, plastic tips or swabs, it delays or prevents a lab’s ability to complete a test, said Dr. Patrick Godbey, president of the College of American Pathologists.

Godbey said labs finish tests within hours when all supplies are on hand. But when labs can’t get supplies, some must ship samples to other labs to test, which delays results two days or more.

“I still can’t to do all the tests I’d like to do,” said Godbey,  laboratory director of Southeast Georgia Regional Medical Center in Brunswick. “If we can’t get the reagents necessary, we measure turnaround time in days.”

When testing demand surged this summer in Sunbelt states, labs in communities hard hit by COVID-19 were routinely taking one week or longer to complete results. Supply shortages snarled results at small and large labs alike. 

At home tests?:Companies attempt to make coronavirus tests widely available

Public health labs also have faced persistent shortages in testing materials since the beginning of the pandemic.

“Those are the kinds of situations where having the federal government step in can make a big difference,” said Plescia, of the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials.

Biden’s plans calls for federal agencies to use the Defense Production Act or other “appropriate authorities” to accelerate manufacturing of a dozen types of supplies: N95 masks, gowns, gloves, test swabs, reagents, plastic pipette tips, testing machines, swabs, needles and syringes, rapid test kits and material for rapid antigen tests. The federal government can use the act to compel private companies to make critical supplies for national defense or national emergencies.

“We still have supply-chain issues that we hope this (Biden’s plan) will address,” Godbey said. 

Biden pushes rapid testing

Biden’s push also calls for wider use of rapid tests to complement lab testing in settings such as schools.

Molecular PCR tests processed at labs remain the gold standard of accurate testing, but they are more expensive and results can take days to process. Rapid antigen tests can be performed outside labs and deliver results in 15 minutes.

Under the Trump administration, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services purchased rapid testing machines for use in nursing homes nationwide. HHS also bought 150 million Abbott BinaxNow portable, rapid tests tests for states, nursing homes, Indian Health Services and Historically Black Colleges and Universities.

Only one rapid test, made by Australia-based Ellume, has gained U.S. Food and Drug Administration authorization for home use without a medical provider’s prescription. Several other companies are developing tests they hope to sell directly to consumers.

The Biden plan will establish a CDC support team to “fund rapid test acquisition and distribution for priority populations, work to spur development and manufacturing of at-home tests and work to ensure that tests are widely available.”

The rapid tests are typically less sensitive than lab tests, which means they might not detect the virus in some cases. It’s a scenario that concerns lab experts like Godbey.

“I worry about inaccurate testing,” Godbey said. “Bad tests are worse than no tests at all.”

But others argue rapid testing makes sense when done frequently because they are likely to quickly detect when a person is infectious and prone to spread the virus to others.

“Even if the individual test lacks a certain sensitivity, you do that test on a frequent basis, that can really add a great deal of population security,” said Dr. William Schaffner, a Vanderbilt University School of Medicine professor of preventive medicine and an infectious disease doctor.

He said it makes sense to deploy such rapid tests in settings such as schools. If students, teachers and other school employees are tested frequently with rapid tests, parents can gain confidence the school is safe.

“All of the sudden the economy gets stimulated again because the parents can go to work,” Schaffner said. 

Michael Mina, a Harvard epidemiologist who has advocated for rapid antigen tests, said such testing can be quickly deployed. If the Biden administration authorizes the purchase and widespread use of these tests, they can be shipped directly to Americans homes and “we can start seeing cases plummet.”

“If we can do that, we can start to see cases come down dramatically across the country within weeks in a way that vaccines could never do in these first 100 days,” Mina said. 

Contributing: Karen Weintraub

Ken Alltucker is on Twitter at @kalltucker, or can be emailed at alltuck@usatoday.com

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2021/01/24/bidens-covid-testing-push-calls-more-supplies-and-rapid-tests/4215619001/

Read original article here

McConnell wants to push Trump’s Senate impeachment trial to mid-February

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has proposed to Majority Leader Chuck Schumer that former President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial should start in mid-February and laid out the preferred timing during a conference call with Republican colleagues on Thursday, according to multiple sources on the call.

Included in McConnell’s proposal is a deal to begin the Senate proceedings in February so that both sides can properly prepare for Trump’s second impeachment trial, according to multiple people on the call. Schumer could be open to this proposal, giving him more time to confirm President Joe Biden’s Cabinet nominees.

Sen. Mike Rounds who was on the call, said his understanding was that McConnell, R-Ky., briefed the conference before going to Schumer, D-N.Y.

“I think we know that we want to make sure that if the Democrats are going to do this impeachment, that the President has a right to due process. And in order to do that he has to prepare a case, they’ve got to set up the rules and so forth so I think it’d be very difficult to start before then,” Rounds, R-S.D., said.

Senator Mike Braun, R-Ind., also told NBC News that he thinks the trial could begin mid-February.

“Senate Republicans are strongly united behind the principle that the institution of the Senate, the office of the presidency, and former President Trump himself all deserve a full and fair process that respects his rights and the serious factual, legal, and constitutional questions at stake,” McConnell said in a statement on Thursday. “Given the unprecedented speed of the House’s process, our proposed timeline for the initial phases includes a modest and reasonable amount of additional time for both sides to assemble their arguments before the Senate would begin to hear them.”

“At this time of strong political passions, Senate Republicans believe it is absolutely imperative that we do not allow a half-baked process to short-circuit the due process that former President Trump deserves or damage the Senate or the presidency,” the statement said.

Both House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Schumer punted on the trial timing question when asked by reporters earlier on Thursday. Pelosi has yet to indicate when she would send the article of impeachment to the Senate, but says “soon.”

“We received Leader McConnell’s proposal that only deals with pre-trial motions late this afternoon. We will review it and discuss it with him,” said Schumer’s spokesman Justin Goodman.

When asked if the president would support moving the impeachment trial to February, White House Communications Director Kate Bedingfield reiterated what Biden has previously said, that he will leave it to Senate leadership to determine the mechanics and timing of the trial.

Bedingfield added that Biden wants the Senate to conduct the impeachment trial in a way that allows them to move forward with the Covid-19 relief legislation as quickly as possible.



Read original article here

The Ultimate News Site