Tag Archives: Pursue

Sources: Cary Fukunaga ‘Abused His Power’ To Pursue Young Women on Set

After wrapping up a scene on the set of Apple TV’s World War II miniseries Masters of the Air, most of the cast and crew decamped. Director Cary Fukunaga, though, hung back and began to take photos of two actresses.

According to two production sources, the celebrated director’s focus was not on the scene’s main players, but rather on two of the background actresses — one of whom had recently turned 18 — dressed as prostitutes from the 1940s. Taking pictures of the young women, he egged them on while they posed suggestively, bent against a wall and kneeling on the ground.

One of the sources claims Fukunaga acted under the guise of needing the photos for continuity purposes — a task normally expected to fall on a production’s wardrobe department and not the man at the helm of a 600-plus cast and crew. To the two production sources who watched the 10-minute interaction unfold, Fukunaga crossed a professional line, using his position in ways that felt uncomfortable to those looking on. 

It was the first red flag, one of the sources claims to Rolling Stone, that they observed during Fukunaga’s time directing a handful of episodes of the miniseries, which is being executive-produced by Tom Hanks and Steven Spielberg. “That was my first gut check,” the source recalls. “It was way past the line. There’s no sort of argument … that it is OK in any way. It’s an absolute, clear-cut abuse of power.” (In a statement provided through his lawyer to Rolling Stone, Fukunaga notes that he “takes pictures of actors – men and women, young and old – on his sets all of the time” and, acknowledging he took pictures of these actresses, says that “[t]o imply anything improper about doing so is false and defamatory.”)

The incident was part of a pattern of Fukunaga’s behavior that concerned nearly a dozen production sources who spoke to Rolling Stone after the acclaimed 44-year-old director was accused of misconduct earlier this month by three women: one who met Fukunaga on the set of a commercial and two sisters who met him on a TV set. (Each of these sources requested anonymity, citing fear of harming their careers and breaching NDAs.)

The filmmaker is one of Hollywood’s youngest major directors, versatile across both film and television. After helming his critically acclaimed 2009 feature Sin Nombre, he was only 32 when he directed his second feature-length film, Jane Eyre, and went on to win an Emmy in 2014 for directing the haunting first season of HBO’s True Detective. Following the success of Netflix’s Beasts of No Nation in 2015, starring Idris Elba, Fukunaga became the first American to direct a James Bond film with last year’s No Time To Die.

Sources who worked with the director on various films, TV series, and commercials over the past six years describe Fukunaga as using his sets as an opportunity to meet younger women and openly pursue multiple female cast and crew members at once during production. 

One crew member alleges Fukunaga’s persistence bordered on workplace harassment, voicing concern that her career could have been put in jeopardy when she tried to turn him down and he wouldn’t take the hint. Another source alleges he sidelined her for a job opportunity, asking her out instead. (Fukunaga denies the claim.)

Those who did end up having a romantic relationship or even a friendship with Fukunaga claim they ultimately walked away feeling confused, gaslighted, or manipulated. (According to Fukunaga’s response through his attorney, Mr. Fukunaga “has befriended men and women, young and old” on set.)

Actress Rachelle Vinberg claimed earlier this month in a lengthy Instagram story that she was diagnosed with PTSD from her friendship that eventually turned sexual with Fukunaga, whom she met in 2016 on a Samsung-commercial set the day after she turned 18. “I spent years being scared of him,” Vinberg wrote on Instagram.Mans is a groomer and has been doing this shit for years. Beware women.” 

“When I thought about him, I just wanted to vomit,” one young woman who dated Fukunaga for a few months after meeting him on the set of one of his productions tells Rolling Stone. “I remember feeling so good to be away from him, like this heavy weight on my shoulder was lifted and [I could] breathe again. He made me feel so claustrophobic and suffocating.”

“I just thought I was really crazy, because he treated me like trash towards the end,” says a second young woman who tells Rolling Stone she began seeing Fukunaga after they met on one of his sets. “I just became a really small, passive, quiet person, and I’m not usually like that.”

When asked about allegations of pursuing romantic relationships with multiple young women on his sets, Fukunaga did not respond. Through an attorney, however, he claims that he has “not acted in any manner that would or should generate” an article focusing on claims of misconduct made against him.

“There is nothing salacious about pursuing friendships or consensual romantic relationships with women,” his attorney Michael Plonsker says in a statement. “Nevertheless, because that would not fit your narrative, you conclude he has done something wrong.”

As for some young women saying that Fukunaga’s romantic advances on set made them feel uncomfortable but they didn’t feel they were in a position to ask him to stop, Fukunaga’s attorney claims that “no one ever – not once – voiced such sentiments to” him. “He creates a work environment that is creative, collaborative and welcoming to all,” Plonsker adds.

Vinberg, who starred on HBO’s Betty, said she initially wasn’t planning on naming Fukunaga when she began venting about men who masqueraded as feminists earlier this month. “Funny how there’s people out there who pose as activists [for] women,” the 23-year-old skateboarder said in an Instagram post. “Guys who are the shittiest fucking individuals in the world and all they do [is] traumatize women … But one day I’m going to expose him because fuck him.” (Vinberg declined to be interviewed for this story.)

Actress Rachelle Vinberg in 2018.

Jeff Spicer/Getty Images

A few hours later, Vinberg named Fukunaga, sharing a handful of texts and Instagram DMs on the platform that she claimed were from the director. In those messages, the director seemed to lament about “failing” to have “game” with women when he was younger and rambled on about the concept of loneliness. Other messages purported to be sent from Fukunaga’s account to Vinberg were childish, sexually suggestive memes, including one that referred to “trying to bang a vegan chick.”

The pair hung out multiple times, according to photos Vinberg posted, and when in the company of others, the actress claimed in her post that Fukunaga asked her to pretend that she was his relative. Other times, Vinberg claimed, Fukunaga would randomly slap her ass, confide in her about his “sexual situation” with romantic partners, and asked about her sexual fantasies. By the time she was 21, Vinberg claimed they had been “fully intimate.” 

“It had to be a secret because it would look bad for him, because people wouldn’t understand, because it would make him look like a predator,” she said on Instagram. “He later bragged to some people that he was the second person I’d ever been with.” 

In her post, Vinberg didn’t go into detail about what led to her fallout with Fukunaga, but by December 2020, things had come to a head, according to her account. “I had tried to reach out to him in the past about how he made me feel and he’s never taken accountability; he basically brushed me off, gaslit me,” she said, sharing a screenshot of their alleged text conversation.

“It just really made me look back at our history as friends,” she added. “What happened [is] unacceptable behavior, meeting this kind of person in a professional setting and then it turns into what it turned into.”

In a statement, Plonsker claims that Fukunaga “had a very brief and consensual romantic relationship with [Vinberg] that has ended. Ms. Vinberg is clearly not happy with Mr. Fukunaga, but as everyone knows, relationships end all of the time and many times one person (or both) are unhappy.” Saying “[t]hat is not news,” he further denies that Fukunaga “groomed” Vinberg.

Hours after Vinberg came forward, twins Cailin and Hannah Loesch published a lengthy statement in support of the actress, detailing what they called a “hot-and-cold” dynamic with Fukunaga after they claimed he befriended them while filming Netflix’s Maniac in 2017. (While the Loeschs declined to comment further, Rolling Stone spoke with three close friends of the sisters who say the Loeschs confided in them at the time, and corroborated the nature of the Loeschs’ relationship with Fukunaga. They recalled frequently discussing Fukunaga with the sisters and claimed they noticed red flags with his alleged behavior.) 

“I believe completely that he was abusing his power. It’s really uncomfortable. It’s horrible … The only reason I allowed it to go on that long is because I’m absolutely worried about my career.”    

The Loeschs, then 20, claimed in their post that they had been hoping for one of two outcomes of their friendship with Fukunaga: becoming “a simple trio of friends” or one of the sisters having a romantic relationship with him. But they claimed Fukunaga seemed only interested in pursuing something with both of them, alleging he had asked them about their openness to a threesome and “suggested incest is fine ‘if all parties are okay with it’” while they were in a hot tub. (Through his attorney, Fukunaga claims he never asked the sisters to participate in a threesome and that the incest comment “never happened.”) The alleged conversation took place after Fukunaga visited the twins’ family’s home in summer 2020.

(Fukunaga is currently searching for a new personal assistant. The position was most recently held by a young woman who the twins claimed had accompanied Fukunaga on the trip to visit the Loesch twins. She did not return Rolling Stone’s request for comment. A job description of the position, which Rolling Stone has reviewed, calls for someone who could expect on an average day “finding a beekeeper in upstate New York and figuring out how to transport Moroccan rugs to the US.”)

A few weeks later, when Fukunaga allegedly invited the twins over to his home, the sisters claimed to have structured a “plan” to gauge if he was interested in one of them romantically, writing they assumed it was Cailin because she seemed to be “the object of his flirty Instagram DMs.” But despite Cailin arriving at his apartment alone, it was only when Hannah arrived at the apartment that they claimed Fukunaga seemed to perk up, writing he was “​​no longer a man of few words.” 

They claimed Fukunaga offered to show them the screener of No Time to Die, with the trio watching the film in his bed. “As we watched the film, he put his hand up underneath Cailin’s skirt and massaged gently,” they wrote. (Fukunaga denies that he made sexual advances on Cailin while Hannah was present.)

The next morning, they decided to cut off their friendship. Cailin allegedly confronted him about his behavior and flirting with both sisters simultaneously, but Fukunaga accused her of overreacting to the situation, the Loeschs claimed. When she cried, he mocked her and asked why she was so bothered when we ‘didn’t even know each other’ … and that she was trying to find meaning that didn’t exist because she liked him,” they wrote. “He asked if she knew ‘how bad this would look’ if the story came out in the wake of the #MeToo movement, saying he ‘did not like’ the person Cailin was describing.” 

“When I saw Rachelle’s posts, it was like a clicking moment of, ‘He’s done the exact same thing to all of us.’”

The twins noted they were “not raped, fired from a job, or made to do anything physical against our will.” But they asked, “So why does it sting so bad now to see this man, the one who we willingly walked away from, propped up as the honorable creator who brought a much-needed, ‘feminist twist’ to an iconic film franchise?”

“We are in the driver’s seat of our own lives,” they added. “We flirted back. We welcomed him into our family’s home, and when it came to be too much, we walked away through unlocked doors. Was it all our fault? Or is the influence of a powerful man, much older and supposedly wiser, enough to take at least part of the blame off our shoulders?”

Soon after Vinberg and the Loeschs came forward, several of their friends and industry colleagues voiced support. Actress Margaret Qualley, who was romantically linked to Fukunaga in 2017, “liked” Vinberg’s post about “gaslighting” men on Instagram. Actress Kristine Froseth, who Fukunaga was also romantically linked with, shared Vinberg’s initial statement about Fukunaga in an Instagram story alongside posts about the stages and signs of grooming. Model Lizzie Swanson and her boyfriend, actor Charlie Plummer, who co-starred with Froseth on Hulu’s Looking for Alaska, both reshared Vinberg’s post. 

When contacted for comment by Rolling Stone, Swanson wrote that she “knew Cary for a time and though he never physically acted upon anything, the emotional and mental patterns and manipulative tactics” she says she experienced “are very, very much the same” as those referred to by Vinberg and other women.

“It’s absolutely fucked up and disgusting,” she adds in a written message. “I believe them and stand by them fully. He needs to be stopped.” 

“We used to call it his fan club. I’d be like, ‘Why the hell are all these young girls always hanging around like puppy dogs?’”

Befriending and pursuing young women during production was a hallmark of Fukunaga’s behavior, sources claim, alleging his habit of treating his sets as a personal pickup bar was openly discussed among the cast and crew. Four women who Rolling Stone spoke with claim they were in their twenties when Fukunaga pursued them romantically on the set of various productions dating back to 2016 and as recently as last year. 

One of the aforementioned production sources claims she was lined up to work with Fukunaga on another project when he suddenly killed the opportunity with a vague excuse but asked her out for drinks. “I just remember at that time I was super crushed because I wanted that job so badly, and needed it,” she says. “I felt really weird about the fact that it was, like, ‘Let me take you out for drinks instead.’” (Mr. Fukunaga denies having withdrawn a job opportunity from a young woman and asking her out for drinks instead.)

The crew member who claimed Fukunaga’s persistent advances made her uncomfortable says that her colleagues began to keep an eye on her while on set. “It was humiliating for me because I tried to fall under the radar,” she says, recalling how Fukunaga would chat her up in front of others. “I believe completely that he was abusing his power. It’s really uncomfortable. It’s horrible.… The only reason I allowed it to go on that long is because I’m absolutely worried about my career.” 

Two sources also claim that Fukunaga offered to give them a stick-and-poke tattoo, something Vinberg also referenced in her account. “He likes to give girls tattoos,” Vinberg said in an Instagram video, showing off a tattoo of a small skateboard on her wrist. “He gave me this tattoo when I was 18 years old, and it’s something he likes to do to girls. It’s like his way of marking women. It’s bizarre.” Vinberg also shared an Instagram message from the Loesch twins claiming he also offered to give them a homemade “stick and poke” tattoo. 

According to his attorney, “Mr. Fukunaga is a talented ‘stick and poke’ tattoo artist and, as such, has been requested by many people – again men and women – to give the tattoos.”

The young woman who briefly dated Fukunaga and said she felt “claustrophobic” during their relationship described being unsettled when she learned that despite believing she landed a role through a routine process, Fukunaga had allegedly tried to contact her months before she was hired by flirtatiously sliding into her DMs.

“That was fucking creepy,” she claims, feeling he had directly taken advantage of his position to hire her “because he wanted to get to know me and date me basically, or fuck me or whatever.” From her own experience, she feels that Fukunaga uses “his power, his fame, and his success in professional settings to attract girls and date them.” (Fukunaga’s attorney says the director “does not even make final hiring decisions. As with most directors, his hiring process is done in conjunction with many people and is based on an individual’s talent qualifications and whether they are the right fit for the project.”)

A fourth young woman who reports that she was intimate with Fukunaga after production of a recent project says their relationship was a “complicated” situation, noting she was conflicted about being romantically involved with her boss. When Vinberg and the Loesch twins came forward, she says the sisters’ account was “like reading a perfectly journaled diary of my time with him.”

“He does that masquerade. He does things to sort of hide behind … ‘Look I can’t possibly hurt women, I hire women. I do things for women.’”

“When I saw Rachelle’s posts, it was like a clicking moment of, ‘He’s done the exact same thing to all of us in such a manipulative and thought-out process,’” she adds, referring to befriending her on set, offering to give her a tattoo, and an overall hot-and-cold dynamic. “He’s not just someone who’s fucked me over; he’s got this routine for girls that look really young.”

Sources on Maniac and Masters of the Air allege Fukunaga would flirt with multiple women at the same time, paying them special attention on set. Three sources on Masters of the Air claim Fukunaga showed interest in at least three young women in the cast and crew during filming.

Crew members recall whispering amongst themselves about Fukunaga’s advances and spending so much time with the younger female members of the cast and crew. A production source who worked on the Samsung commercial with Vinberg says Fukunaga’s “centralized attention” to Vinberg was memorable six years on. It didn’t strike the source as “icky” at the time, they say, but it did stick with them, claiming they noticed Fukunaga’s “intensity” while interacting with Vinberg. 

Two sources from Maniac noted Fukunaga seemed to surround himself with younger women. “We used to call it his fan club,” one says. “I’d be like, ‘Why the hell are all these young girls always hanging around like puppy dogs?’” 

But people turned a blind eye toward the situation, the source explains. “If it doesn’t involve them, everybody kind of turns the other cheek. Other people would be like, ‘Oh, come on. The guy’s a good-looking, young director that has a penchant for younger girls. Big deal.’ A lot of us didn’t really think of it as a big deal; it just was like, ‘You’re creepy, my guy.’ You don’t need to be doing this, but for some reason that’s what he did.” 

However, the production source says their outlook on the situation changed when Fukunaga took notice of their colleague, obtaining the young woman’s cell phone number from the crew list, and texting her to go for drinks. “Looking back at it, it felt weird,” they say. “Just a little unsettling.”

Production romances are hardly taboo in Hollywood. Spending 12-plus-hour days with colleagues for a shoot that could stretch months, it’s no surprise that multiple flings arise from the near-constant time cast and crew spend together. 

But sources allege Fukunaga’s behavior crosses the line of having a casual romance during production. It wasn’t just that Fukunaga was everyone’s boss, but his status within the industry could help launch someone’s career (or at the very least ensure a gig on his next project). The woman who casually dated Fukunaga claims he had floated the idea of helping make her a “famous actress” and suggested putting her in his other projects.

“It is evident that he utilizes his influence in the film industry to pursue many young women,” says another source who dated Fukunaga. (Fukunaga denies this, saying “This is simply not true. Period.”)

Of the four women who claim to Rolling Stone that Fukunaga pursued them during productions, one says she was fearful of the career implications when she tried to rebuff his advances. “It’s a really scary thing,” she says, “when Cary is being a certain type of way with you, and you don’t feel like you can ask [him] to stop.” 

Actresses Hannah Loesch (L) and Cailin Loesch in 2018.

Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images

Fukunaga’s actions seem to be a jarring and hypocritical contrast to his public statements about championing and supporting women, something sources, as well as Vinberg and the Loesch sisters, noted. 

“He does that masquerade,” one Masters of the Air production source says, after witnessing Fukunaga’s interactions with the background actresses and referencing the director’s public statements. “He does things to sort of hide behind … ‘Look I can’t possibly hurt women, I hire women. I do things for women.” 

During the run-up to the release of No Time to Die — the first time an American directed a James Bond film — Fukunaga spoke strongly of modernizing Bond in the wake of the #MeToo movement. “You have to be willing to lean in and do the work to make the female characters more than just contrivances,” he told The Hollywood Reporter

But his statements rang hollow to actress Raeden Greer, who came forward to accuse Fukunaga of firing her from the first season of True Detective when she was suddenly asked to go topless for a scene, despite claiming she did not have a nudity rider in her contract. “It was degrading,” she told The Daily Beast last year. “And now, Cary is out here talking about his female characters — it’s like another slap in the face over and over and over.” 

And it was Fukunaga reacting to the Supreme Court’s leaked draft opinion overruling Roe v. Wade, by saying the court just legitimized “a war against women’s rights” on Instagram, that Vinberg says made her decide to come forward. 

“There’s this guy, right, he’s like, ‘Oh, women’s rights in America, we have to protect it,’” she said on Instagram, shortly before naming Fukunaga. “He fucking traumatizes women. He doesn’t give a fuck about women. He refers to women as ‘whores.’ I’ve heard that, it pisses me off … And he’s out here like I care about women. Go fuck yourself. You don’t give a fuck about women.” 

It was a sentiment echoed by Fukunaga’s former writing partner Nick Cuse, who came out in support of Vinberg and the Loesch twins — the first public admonishment that came from someone that had worked closely with Fukunaga for a number of years. Cuse, who worked as a consultant on No Time to Die and was a co-producer and writer for Maniac, wrote in an Instagram story that Fukunaga is the “worst human being I have ever met in my life,” saying that the way Fukunaga treats non-celebrities “is horrible. I once saw him dump his cut fingernails in another person’s car.”

“He didn’t groom me to fuck me, but he did use a lot of the same tactics to get me to write his scripts for him,” he wrote in the Instagram story. “Which he would then put his name on. One time, after me spending three weeks on a script for him, he told me to open up the cover page and type his name under ‘Written By.’ I had to literally type in the stolen credit with my own fingers.” (Cuse did not respond to requests for further comment.)

Vinberg also referenced grooming methods when she spoke of her experience with Fukunaga, calling him a “groomer” and sharing informational posts about grooming, which were reposted by Fukunaga’s ex-girlfriend Froseth. Vinberg later explained she was also referring to manipulation tactics. “There’s so much more to it than just the intimate moments … there’s so much more behind the scenes that makes it wrong.”

“I don’t have high hopes that [Fukunaga] will ever acknowledge any of this or apologize. But if at least the industry as a whole can acknowledge that we’re not accepting this type of treatment in the workplace … that would be enough for me.”

Daniel Pollack, a professor at Yeshiva University and expert witness on child abuse, tells Rolling Stone that while grooming is often associated with the sexual abuse of minors, the term also can apply to adults. At its core, grooming involves targeting an often vulnerable person and gaining their trust, only to exploit that same trust for a perpetrator’s ulterior motive. 

People tend to “minimize” the idea that adults can be groomed or coerced into certain situations simply because they are of legal age, explains Laura Palumbo, communications director for the National Sexual Violence Resource Center. “We do excuse a lot of harmful behavior, and it’s often from a very victim-blaming point of view,” she says. 

“Our society also struggles with recognizing the trauma that can happen within an abusive relationship … when you believe a person is trustworthy and safe and then realize that that is not the case,” Palumbo adds. “There is that breach of trust and emotional manipulation that is not only difficult for victims in the context of that relationship, but even for them moving forward to be able to to trust other individuals.”

And it’s often not just the victim who is exposed to the groomer’s charm, Pollack says, but “a lot of other people in institutions have to be groomed along the way.

“That groomer is grooming the institution … they groom their own colleagues,” he adds. “From the groomer’s perspective, it’s as much art as it is science.” 

Cuse noted his relationship with Fukunaga was not “remotely comparable” to what the women who’ve come forward claimed to have experienced, but wrote, “I wish someone had told me not to [work with him]. I deeply regret it.”

The production sources who Fukunaga allegedly pursued on set say, like Cuse, they also wish they had been cautioned about Fukunaga, which is why they made the decision to speak out now. “I really, really wish someone would have just said one thing to me: ‘Be careful with him.’ But no one said anything,” one says. “I definitely don’t see myself as a victim … but I see that I was close to something that was dangerous” she said, alluding to what other women have claimed about feeling manipulated by Fukunaga and, in Vinberg’s case, suffering from PTSD.

“I don’t know what exactly happened,” one of the production sources adds. “But if it’s him being slightly pervy and making people uncomfortable, I do think it needs to be out in the open because I think people need to learn. It actually scares me how much people get away with this in the industry.” 

“I do not believe I was personally abused by Cary,” says a source who dated Fukunaga. “But many of the behaviors and actions I witnessed during the time I spent with him mirror and corroborate the events claimed by women who have spoken out so far.”

It was why Greer says she came forward with her alleged experience with Fukunaga on True Detective seven months ago, hoping for some form of accountability. “I thought that I might be the only person who ever did say anything negative about him,” she tells Rolling Stone

Seeing Vinberg and the Loesch sisters come forward, Greer says she hopes their stories will be recognized by the wider Hollywood industry and result in change, not just on Fukunaga’s part, but for anyone in a position of power. 

“I don’t have high hopes that [Fukunaga] will ever acknowledge any of this or apologize,” she says. “But if at least the industry as a whole can acknowledge that we’re not accepting this type of treatment in the workplace, and that these things happened and are not acceptable, that would be enough for me.”



Read original article here

Miami’s Isaiah Wong will stay with Hurricanes, pursue more NIL deals after threatening to transfer

Less than a week after landing one of the top transfers of the offseason in guard Nigel Pack, who scored an $800,000 NIL deal, Miami nearly lost another star wanting a raise of his own. Isaiah Wong, who helped facilitate the Hurricanes’ Elite Eight run, threatened to enter the transfer portal Thursday over an NIL dispute before backtracking a day later.  

After Wong’s agent told ESPN his client would leave the Hurricanes if his NIL compensation wasn’t boosted, Miami booster John Ruiz decided Friday afternoon that he would help Wong find additional NIL opportunities with different companies. 

The ultimatum from Wong’s camp came after Ruiz announced a two-year deal at $400,000 per year — plus a car — through the company LifeWallet for Pack last weekend. Pack ranks No. 2 on the CBS Sports list of college basketball’s top transfers this offseason and is poised to help Miami replace the departing production of guards Kam McGusty and Charlie Moore.

“If Isaiah and his family don’t feel that the NIL number meets their expectations they will be entering the transfer portal tomorrow, while maintaining his eligibility in the NBA draft and going through the draft process,” his agent, Adam Papas, told ESPN.

But, at first, Ruiz balked at the idea that Wong is in store for a raise, telling ESPN that “Isaiah is under contract.”

“He has been treated by LifeWallet exceptionally well,” Ruiz said, according to ESPN. “If that is what he decides, I wish him well, however, I DO NOT renegotiate! Surprises me because there are so many players that would love to play for the U!”

Wong averaged 15.3 points for the Hurricanes while starting in 36 of the team’s 37 games this past season in his third year with the program. He was particularly clutch for the Hurricanes during the opening weekend of the NCAA Tournament as he led the team in scoring with 22 points in a first-round victory over USC and 21 in a second-round win over Auburn. 

The deadline is Sunday for players to enter the portal and be eligible next season, and the deadline for early entrants to withdraw from the NBA Draft is June 13.

require.config({"baseUrl":"https://sportsfly.cbsistatic.com/fly-0220/bundles/sportsmediajs/js-build","config":{"version":{"fly/components/accordion":"1.0","fly/components/alert":"1.0","fly/components/base":"1.0","fly/components/carousel":"1.0","fly/components/dropdown":"1.0","fly/components/fixate":"1.0","fly/components/form-validate":"1.0","fly/components/image-gallery":"1.0","fly/components/iframe-messenger":"1.0","fly/components/load-more":"1.0","fly/components/load-more-article":"1.0","fly/components/load-more-scroll":"1.0","fly/components/loading":"1.0","fly/components/modal":"1.0","fly/components/modal-iframe":"1.0","fly/components/network-bar":"1.0","fly/components/poll":"1.0","fly/components/search-player":"1.0","fly/components/social-button":"1.0","fly/components/social-counts":"1.0","fly/components/social-links":"1.0","fly/components/tabs":"1.0","fly/components/video":"1.0","fly/libs/easy-xdm":"2.4.17.1","fly/libs/jquery.cookie":"1.2","fly/libs/jquery.throttle-debounce":"1.1","fly/libs/jquery.widget":"1.9.2","fly/libs/omniture.s-code":"1.0","fly/utils/jquery-mobile-init":"1.0","fly/libs/jquery.mobile":"1.3.2","fly/libs/backbone":"1.0.0","fly/libs/underscore":"1.5.1","fly/libs/jquery.easing":"1.3","fly/managers/ad":"2.0","fly/managers/components":"1.0","fly/managers/cookie":"1.0","fly/managers/debug":"1.0","fly/managers/geo":"1.0","fly/managers/gpt":"4.3","fly/managers/history":"2.0","fly/managers/madison":"1.0","fly/managers/social-authentication":"1.0","fly/utils/data-prefix":"1.0","fly/utils/data-selector":"1.0","fly/utils/function-natives":"1.0","fly/utils/guid":"1.0","fly/utils/log":"1.0","fly/utils/object-helper":"1.0","fly/utils/string-helper":"1.0","fly/utils/string-vars":"1.0","fly/utils/url-helper":"1.0","libs/jshashtable":"2.1","libs/select2":"3.5.1","libs/jsonp":"2.4.0","libs/jquery/mobile":"1.4.5","libs/modernizr.custom":"2.6.2","libs/velocity":"1.2.2","libs/dataTables":"1.10.6","libs/dataTables.fixedColumns":"3.0.4","libs/dataTables.fixedHeader":"2.1.2","libs/dateformat":"1.0.3","libs/waypoints/infinite":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/inview":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/jquery.waypoints":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/sticky":"3.1.1","libs/jquery/dotdotdot":"1.6.1","libs/jquery/flexslider":"2.1","libs/jquery/lazyload":"1.9.3","libs/jquery/maskedinput":"1.3.1","libs/jquery/marquee":"1.3.1","libs/jquery/numberformatter":"1.2.3","libs/jquery/placeholder":"0.2.4","libs/jquery/scrollbar":"0.1.6","libs/jquery/tablesorter":"2.0.5","libs/jquery/touchswipe":"1.6.18","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.core":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.draggable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.mouse":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.position":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.slider":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.sortable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.touch-punch":"0.2.3","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.autocomplete":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.accordion":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tabs":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.menu":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.dialog":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.resizable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.button":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tooltip":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.effects":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.datepicker":"1.11.4"}},"shim":{"liveconnection/managers/connection":{"deps":["liveconnection/libs/sockjs-0.3.4"]},"liveconnection/libs/sockjs-0.3.4":{"exports":"SockJS"},"libs/setValueFromArray":{"exports":"set"},"libs/getValueFromArray":{"exports":"get"},"fly/libs/jquery.mobile-1.3.2":["version!fly/utils/jquery-mobile-init"],"libs/backbone.marionette":{"deps":["jquery","version!fly/libs/underscore","version!fly/libs/backbone"],"exports":"Marionette"},"fly/libs/underscore-1.5.1":{"exports":"_"},"fly/libs/backbone-1.0.0":{"deps":["version!fly/libs/underscore","jquery"],"exports":"Backbone"},"libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tabs-1.11.4":["jquery","version!libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.core","version!fly/libs/jquery.widget"],"libs/jquery/flexslider-2.1":["jquery"],"libs/dataTables.fixedColumns-3.0.4":["jquery","version!libs/dataTables"],"libs/dataTables.fixedHeader-2.1.2":["jquery","version!libs/dataTables"],"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/app/VideoPlayer/AdobePass-min.js":["https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/util/Utils-min.js"]},"map":{"*":{"adobe-pass":"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/app/VideoPlayer/AdobePass-min.js","facebook":"https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js","facebook-debug":"https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all/debug.js","google":"https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js","google-platform":"https://apis.google.com/js/client:platform.js","google-csa":"https://www.google.com/adsense/search/async-ads.js","google-javascript-api":"https://www.google.com/jsapi","google-client-api":"https://apis.google.com/js/api:client.js","gpt":"https://securepubads.g.doubleclick.net/tag/js/gpt.js","hlsjs":"https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/hls.js/1.0.7/hls.js","newsroom":"https://c2.taboola.com/nr/cbsinteractive-cbssports/newsroom.js","recaptcha":"https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?onload=loadRecaptcha&render=explicit","recaptcha_ajax":"https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api/js/recaptcha_ajax.js","supreme-golf":"https://sgapps-staging.supremegolf.com/search/assets/js/bundle.js","taboola":"https://cdn.taboola.com/libtrc/cbsinteractive-cbssports/loader.js","twitter":"https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js","video-avia":"https://vidtech.cbsinteractive.com/avia-js/1.14.0/player/avia.min.js","video-avia-ui":"https://vidtech.cbsinteractive.com/avia-js/1.14.0/plugins/ui/avia.ui.min.js","video-avia-gam":"https://vidtech.cbsinteractive.com/avia-js/1.14.0/plugins/gam/avia.gam.min.js","video-ima3":"https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/sdkloader/ima3.js","video-ima3-dai":"https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/sdkloader/ima3_dai.js","video-utils":"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/util/Utils-min.js","video-vast-tracking":"https://vidtech.cbsinteractive.com/sb55/vast-js/vtg-vast-client.js"}},"waitSeconds":300});



Read original article here

Virginia Thomas urged White House chief to pursue unrelenting efforts to overturn the 2020 election, texts show

The messages — 29 in all — reveal an extraordinary pipeline between Virginia Thomas, who goes by Ginni, and President Donald Trump’s top aide during a period when Trump and his allies were vowing to go to the Supreme Court in an effort to negate the election results.

On Nov. 10, after news organizations had projected Joe Biden the winner based on state vote totals, Thomas wrote to Meadows: “Help This Great President stand firm, Mark!!!…You are the leader, with him, who is standing for America’s constitutional governance at the precipice. The majority knows Biden and the Left is attempting the greatest Heist of our History.”

When Meadows wrote to Thomas on Nov. 24, the White House chief of staff invoked God to describe the effort to overturn the election. “This is a fight of good versus evil,” Meadows wrote. “Evil always looks like the victor until the King of Kings triumphs. Do not grow weary in well doing. The fight continues. I have staked my career on it. Well at least my time in DC on it.”

Thomas replied: “Thank you!! Needed that! This plus a conversation with my best friend just now… I will try to keep holding on. America is worth it!”

It is unclear to whom Thomas was referring.

The messages, which do not directly reference Justice Thomas or the Supreme Court, show for the first time how Ginni Thomas used her access to Trump’s inner circle to promote and seek to guide the president’s strategy to overturn the election results — and how receptive and grateful Meadows said he was to receive her advice. Among Thomas’s stated goals in the messages was for lawyer Sidney Powell, who promoted incendiary and unsupported claims about the election, to be “the lead and the face” of Trump’s legal team.

The text messages were among 2,320 that Meadows provided to the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol. The content of messages between Thomas and Meadows — 21 sent by her, eight by him – has not previously been reported. They were reviewed by The Post and CBS News and then confirmed by five people who have seen the committee’s documents.

Meadows’s attorney, George Terwilliger III, confirmed the existence of the 29 messages between his client and Thomas. In reviewing the substance of the messages Wednesday, he said that neither he nor Meadows would comment on individual texts. But, Terwilliger added, “nothing about the text messages presents any legal issues.”

Ginni Thomas did not respond to multiple requests for comment made Thursday by email and phone. Justice Thomas, who has been hospitalized for treatment of an infection, did not respond to a request for comment made through the Supreme Court’s public information office.

It is unknown whether Ginni Thomas and Meadows exchanged additional messages between the election and Biden’s inauguration beyond the 29 received by the committee. Shortly after providing the 2,320 messages, Meadows ceased cooperating with the committee, arguing that any further engagement could violate Trump’s claims of executive privilege. Committee members and aides said they believe the messages may be just a portion of the pair’s total exchanges.

A spokesman for the committee declined to comment. The revelation of Thomas’s messages with Meadows comes three weeks after lawyers for the committee said in a court filing that the panel has “a good-faith basis for concluding that the President and members of his Campaign engaged in a criminal conspiracy to defraud the United States” and obstruct the counting of electoral votes by Congress.

Trump spoke publicly during this period about his intent to contest the election results in the Supreme Court. “This is a major fraud on our nation,” the president said in a speech at 2:30 the morning after the election. “We want the law to be used in a proper manner. So we’ll be going to the U.S. Supreme Court.”

Thomas has publicly denied any conflict of interest between her activism and her husband’s work on the Supreme Court. “Clarence doesn’t discuss his work with me, and I don’t involve him in my work,” she said in an interview with the Washington Free Beacon, a conservative outlet, for an article published March 14.

Ginni Thomas, in that interview, also acknowledged that she had attended Trump’s “Stop the Steal” rally at the Ellipse near the White House on Jan. 6, but said that she left early because it was too cold and that she did not have any role in planning the event.

Justice Thomas, 73, is the Supreme Court’s longest-serving current justice and has missed oral arguments this week because of his hospitalization. He has made few public comments about the 2020 election. In February 2021, when the Supreme Court rejected election challenges filed by Trump and his allies, Thomas wrote in a dissent that it was “baffling” and “inexplicable” that the majority had decided against hearing the cases because he believed the Supreme Court should provide states with guidance for future elections.

In her text messages to Meadows, Ginni Thomas spread false theories, commented on cable news segments and advocated with urgency and fervor that the president and his team take action to reverse the outcome of the election. She urged that they take a hard line with Trump staffers and congressional Republicans who had resisted arguments that the election was stolen.

In the messages, Thomas and Meadows each assert a belief that the election was stolen and seem to share a solidarity of purpose and faith, though they occasionally express differences on tactics.

“The intense pressures you and our President are now experiencing are more intense than Anything Experienced (but I only felt a fraction of it in 1991),” Thomas wrote to Meadows on Nov. 19, an apparent reference to Justice Thomas’s 1991 confirmation hearings in which lawyer Anita Hill testified that he had made unwanted sexual comments when he was her boss. Thomas strongly denied the accusations.

The first of the 29 messages between Ginni Thomas and Meadows was sent on Nov. 5, two days after the election. She sent him a link to a YouTube video labeled “TRUMP STING w CIA Director Steve Pieczenik, The Biggest Election Story in History, QFS-BLOCKCHAIN.”

Pieczenik, a former State Department official, is a far-right commentator who has falsely claimed that the 2012 massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., was a “false-flag” operation to push a gun-control agenda.

The video Thomas shared with Meadows is no longer available on YouTube. But Thomas wrote to Meadows, “I hope this is true; never heard anything like this before, or even a hint of it. Possible???”

“Watermarked ballots in over 12 states have been part of a huge Trump & military white hat sting operation in 12 key battleground states,” she wrote.

During that period, supporters of the QAnon extremist ideology embraced a false theory that Trump had watermarked mail-in ballots so he could track potential fraud. “Watch the water” was a refrain in QAnon circles at the time.

In the Nov. 5 message to Meadows, Thomas went on to quote a passage that had circulated on right-wing websites: “Biden crime family & ballot fraud co-conspirators (elected officials, bureaucrats, social media censorship mongers, fake stream media reporters, etc) are being arrested & detained for ballot fraud right now & over coming days, & will be living in barges off GITMO to face military tribunals for sedition.”

The text messages received by the House select committee do not include a response from Meadows.

The next day, Nov. 6, Thomas sent a follow-up to Meadows: “Do not concede. It takes time for the army who is gathering for his back.”

It is unclear if Meadows responded.

On Nov. 10, Thomas drew a reply from Meadows. She wrote, “Mark, I wanted to text you and tell you for days you are in my prayers!!” She continued by urging him to “Help This Great President stand firm” and invoking “the greatest Heist of our History.”

Thomas added in the message that Meadows should “Listen to Rush. Mark Steyn, Bongino, Cleta” — appearing to refer to conservative commentators Rush Limbaugh, Mark Steyn and Dan Bongino, as well as lawyer Cleta Mitchell, who was involved in Trump’s push to claim victory in Georgia despite Biden’s certified win there.

One minute later, Meadows responded: “I will stand firm. We will fight until there is no fight left. Our country is too precious to give up on. Thanks for all you do.”

Nine minutes after that, Thomas replied, “Tearing up and praying for you guys!!!!! So proud to know you!!”

Later that night, Ginni Thomas messaged Meadows seeming to react to a cable news segment. “Van Jones spins interestingly, but shows us the balls being juggled too,” Thomas said, referring to the prominent CNN commentator.

Thomas then turned to her frustrations with congressional Republicans and said she wished more of them were rallying behind Trump and being more active with his base voters, who were furious about the election.

She wrote, “House and Senate guys are pathetic too… only 4 GOP House members seen out in street rallies with grassroots… Gohmert, Jordan, Gosar, and Roy.” She appeared to be referring to Republican House members Louie Gohmert of Texas, Jim Jordan of Ohio, Paul A. Gosar of Arizona and Chip Roy of Texas.

This was a troubled time for Trump. News organizations had declared Biden the winner on Nov. 7, after a review of vote totals in each state and the electoral count. Trump’s legal operation was divided between his campaign’s official lawyers and Rudolph W. Giuliani, Trump’s confidant and personal attorney who was fast asserting control of his campaign’s legal strategy. While many Republicans supported Trump’s filing of legal challenges in several states, his lawyers stumbled in court and many allies by mid-November were privately confiding that Trump’s legal battle would be short-lived.

Yet Thomas urged Meadows to plow ahead, rally Republicans around Trump and remind them of his enduring political capital.

“Where the heck are all those who benefited by Presidents coattails?!!!” she wrote in her text message to him late on Nov. 10. She then told him to watch a YouTube video about the power of never conceding.

Meadows might not have been Thomas’s only contact inside the Trump White House that week. On Nov. 13, she texted Meadows about her outreach to “Jared,” potentially a reference to Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and senior White House adviser. She wrote, “Just forwarded to yr gmail an email I sent Jared this am. Sidney Powell & improved coordination now will help the cavalry come and Fraud exposed and America saved.” The messages provided to the House select committee do not show a response by Meadows.

Kushner did not respond to a request for comment.

Powell was becoming ubiquitous on television — and winning the president’s favor, according to several Trump advisers — as she claimed without evidence that electronic voting systems had stolen the election from Trump by switching millions of ballots in Biden’s favor. She claimed, again without evidence, that hundreds of thousands of ballots were appearing out of nowhere and that a global communist conspiracy was afoot involving Venezuela, Cuba, and probably China.

Still, while Trump cheered some of Powell’s commentary, she was a polarizing figure in his orbit. Her views were considered so extreme and unsupported by evidence that David Bossie, a longtime Trump supporter, told others that she was peddling “concocted B.S.” After Fox News host Tucker Carlson contacted Powell about her claim that electronic voting machines had switched ballots to Biden, he told his viewers that he found her answers evasive and that she had shown no evidence to support her assertion. He stopped having her on his program.

Ginni Thomas stood by her. “Don’t let her and your assets be marginalized instead…help her be the lead and the face,” she wrote to Meadows on Nov. 13.

The following day, Nov. 14, Thomas sent Meadows material she said was from Connie Hair, chief of staff to Gohmert. It is not clear if she was passing on a message from Hair or sharing Hair’s perspective as guidance for Meadows. The text message seems to quote Hair’s belief that “the most important thing you can realize right now is that there are no rules in war.”

“This war is psychological. PSYOP,” the text from Thomas states.

Hair said Thursday that she did not have any specific recollection of that text message.

On Nov. 19, which would be a crucial day for Powell as she spoke at a news conference at the Republican National Committee, Thomas continued to bolster Powell’s standing in a text to Meadows.

“Mark (don’t want to wake you)… ” Thomas wrote. “Sounds like Sidney and her team are getting inundated with evidence of fraud. Make a plan. Release the Kraken and save us from the left taking America down.”

“Release the Kraken” had become a catchphrase on the far right after the election, used as shorthand for the anticipated exposure of a voter fraud conspiracy that would upend Biden’s victory with the same force as a “Kraken,” a mythical giant sea monster.

In that same exchange, Thomas also at one point offered Meadows advice on managing the West Wing staff.

“Suggestion: You need to buck up your team on the inside, Mark,” Thomas wrote. “The lower level insiders are scared, fearful or sending out signals of hopelessness vs an awareness of the existential threat to America right now. You can buck them up, strengthen their spirits.”

“Monica Crowley,” Thomas said, referring to the conservative commentator, “may have a sense of this [from] her Nixon days.” Crowley, a top official in Trump’s Treasury Department, had been an aide to former president Richard M. Nixon years after he resigned from office in 1974 because of the Watergate scandal.

Thomas then wrote, “You guys fold, the evil just moves fast down underneath you all. Lots of intensifying threats coming to ACB and others.” Justice Amy Coney Barrett, sometimes called “ACB” by her supporters, had joined the Supreme Court in October, shortly before the election. It is unclear to what threats Thomas was referring.

Later on Nov. 19, Meadows replied to Thomas’s long text message by saying, “Thanks so much.”

But Thomas’s high aspirations for Powell quickly collapsed that afternoon. Instead of capturing the nation’s attention at the RNC news conference, where she spoke alongside Giuliani and other Trump advisers, Powell was criticized for spreading a false theory about electronic voting machines as a tool for communists. Some Trump aides were horrified by her and Giuliani’s performances and felt they had embarrassed the president by becoming a parody of his post-election fight.

As Giuliani spoke, a dark brown liquid mixed with beads of sweat rolled down his cheek. “Did you watch ‘My Cousin Vinny?’ ” he asked reporters, tying a legal reference to the 1992 comedy.

Thomas wrote to Meadows, “Tears are flowing at what Rudy is doing right now!!!!”

“Glad to help,” Meadows replied.

By Nov. 22, Trump gave his blessing for Giuliani and another Trump lawyer, Jenna Ellis, to issue a statement claiming that Powell “is not a member of the Trump Legal Team.”

Thomas reached out to Meadows that day with concern. “Trying to understand the Sidney Powell distancing,” she wrote.

“She doesn’t have anything or at least she won’t share it if she does,” Meadows texted back.

“Wow!” Thomas replied.

On Nov. 24, Thomas engaged Meadows again by sharing a video from Parler, a conservative social media website, that appeared to refer to conservative commentator Glenn Beck.

“If you all cave to the elites, you have to know that many of your 73 million feel like what Glenn is expressing,” Thomas wrote.

She said Trump risked his supporters growing disenchanted to the point of walking away from politics. “Me included,” she wrote. “I think I am done with politics, and I don’t think I am alone, Mark.”

Meadows replied three minutes later: “I don’t know what you mean by caving to the elites.”

Thomas responded: “I can’t see Americans swallowing the obvious fraud. Just going with one more thing with no frickin consequences… the whole coup and now this… we just cave to people wanting Biden to be anointed? Many of us can’t continue the GOP charade.”

After continued back-and-forth, Meadows wrote, “You’re preaching to the choir. Very demoralizing.”

The text exchanges with Thomas that Meadows provided to the House select committee pause after Nov. 24, 2020, with an unexplained gap in correspondence. The committee received one additional message sent by Thomas to Meadows, on Jan. 10, four days after the “Stop the Steal” rally Thomas said she attended and the deadly attack on the Capitol.

In that message, Thomas expresses support for Meadows and Trump — and directed anger at Vice President Mike Pence, who had refused Trump’s wishes to block the congressional certification of Biden’s electoral college victory.

“We are living through what feels like the end of America,” Thomas wrote to Meadows. “Most of us are disgusted with the VP and are in listening mode to see where to fight with our teams. Those who attacked the Capitol are not representative of our great teams of patriots for DJT!!”

“Amazing times,” she added. “The end of Liberty.”

Read original article here

Goran Dragic signs with Nets: Veteran guard will pursue title in Brooklyn after buyout from Spurs, per report

Getty Images

Goran Dragic is signing with the Brooklyn Nets now that he has secured a buyout from the San Antonio Spurs, according to The Athletic’s Shams Charania. Dragic started the season with the Toronto Raptors after being dealt away from his longtime home of Miami in the Kyle Lowry deal, but it became apparent early on that the two sides were not interested in a long-term partnership. Dragic played just five games as a Raptor before leaving the team for personal reasons. He was dealt to San Antonio on Feb. 10 (trade deadline day), but the rebuilding Spurs had no need for his services. Now he’ll join a contender that badly needed him.

The Nets entered this season with more ball-handling than they knew what to do with. The combination of James Harden, Kyrie Irving and Patty Mills left little room for another offense-first guard, but Irving is eligible to play in just half of Brooklyn’s games due to a New York City COVID vaccine mandate and Harden was recently dealt to the Philadelphia 76ers. Ben Simmons came back in that deal, and he is a ball-handler, but not one suited to half-court shot-creation in a postseason setting.

In Dragic, the Nets have given themselves an insurance policy against Irving’s absence and Simmons’ postseason problems. It was only two seasons ago that Dragic averaged more than 19 points per game in helping the Heat reach the NBA Finals. He is now 35 years old and likely can’t play heavy minutes, but he was still a solid secondary shot-creator for the Heat a season ago. With Kevin Durant in place, that’s all he’ll need to be for the Nets.

Brooklyn likely appealed to Dragic for two reasons. The opportunity to compete for a title must have played into his decision. Dragic has played in the Finals, but has never won a championship. But as a 2022 free agent, Dragic now has a chance to boost his value and potential score one last major contract. No other contender could offer Dragic the minutes and touches that Brooklyn can due to Irving’s unique circumstances. Half of the time, Dragic could serve as Brooklyn’s starting point guard.

Even if he doesn’t, Dragic was one of the most coveted players in buyout market history. He could have joined practically any contender. He chose the Nets, and that suggests they plan to make him a major part of their championship push this spring.

require.config({"baseUrl":"https://sportsfly.cbsistatic.com/fly-0163/bundles/sportsmediajs/js-build","config":{"version":{"fly/components/accordion":"1.0","fly/components/alert":"1.0","fly/components/base":"1.0","fly/components/carousel":"1.0","fly/components/dropdown":"1.0","fly/components/fixate":"1.0","fly/components/form-validate":"1.0","fly/components/image-gallery":"1.0","fly/components/iframe-messenger":"1.0","fly/components/load-more":"1.0","fly/components/load-more-article":"1.0","fly/components/load-more-scroll":"1.0","fly/components/loading":"1.0","fly/components/modal":"1.0","fly/components/modal-iframe":"1.0","fly/components/network-bar":"1.0","fly/components/poll":"1.0","fly/components/search-player":"1.0","fly/components/social-button":"1.0","fly/components/social-counts":"1.0","fly/components/social-links":"1.0","fly/components/tabs":"1.0","fly/components/video":"1.0","fly/libs/easy-xdm":"2.4.17.1","fly/libs/jquery.cookie":"1.2","fly/libs/jquery.throttle-debounce":"1.1","fly/libs/jquery.widget":"1.9.2","fly/libs/omniture.s-code":"1.0","fly/utils/jquery-mobile-init":"1.0","fly/libs/jquery.mobile":"1.3.2","fly/libs/backbone":"1.0.0","fly/libs/underscore":"1.5.1","fly/libs/jquery.easing":"1.3","fly/managers/ad":"2.0","fly/managers/components":"1.0","fly/managers/cookie":"1.0","fly/managers/debug":"1.0","fly/managers/geo":"1.0","fly/managers/gpt":"4.3","fly/managers/history":"2.0","fly/managers/madison":"1.0","fly/managers/social-authentication":"1.0","fly/utils/data-prefix":"1.0","fly/utils/data-selector":"1.0","fly/utils/function-natives":"1.0","fly/utils/guid":"1.0","fly/utils/log":"1.0","fly/utils/object-helper":"1.0","fly/utils/string-helper":"1.0","fly/utils/string-vars":"1.0","fly/utils/url-helper":"1.0","libs/jshashtable":"2.1","libs/select2":"3.5.1","libs/jsonp":"2.4.0","libs/jquery/mobile":"1.4.5","libs/modernizr.custom":"2.6.2","libs/velocity":"1.2.2","libs/dataTables":"1.10.6","libs/dataTables.fixedColumns":"3.0.4","libs/dataTables.fixedHeader":"2.1.2","libs/dateformat":"1.0.3","libs/waypoints/infinite":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/inview":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/jquery.waypoints":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/sticky":"3.1.1","libs/jquery/dotdotdot":"1.6.1","libs/jquery/flexslider":"2.1","libs/jquery/lazyload":"1.9.3","libs/jquery/maskedinput":"1.3.1","libs/jquery/marquee":"1.3.1","libs/jquery/numberformatter":"1.2.3","libs/jquery/placeholder":"0.2.4","libs/jquery/scrollbar":"0.1.6","libs/jquery/tablesorter":"2.0.5","libs/jquery/touchswipe":"1.6.18","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.core":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.draggable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.mouse":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.position":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.slider":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.sortable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.touch-punch":"0.2.3","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.autocomplete":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.accordion":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tabs":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.menu":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.dialog":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.resizable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.button":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tooltip":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.effects":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.datepicker":"1.11.4"}},"shim":{"liveconnection/managers/connection":{"deps":["liveconnection/libs/sockjs-0.3.4"]},"liveconnection/libs/sockjs-0.3.4":{"exports":"SockJS"},"libs/setValueFromArray":{"exports":"set"},"libs/getValueFromArray":{"exports":"get"},"fly/libs/jquery.mobile-1.3.2":["version!fly/utils/jquery-mobile-init"],"libs/backbone.marionette":{"deps":["jquery","version!fly/libs/underscore","version!fly/libs/backbone"],"exports":"Marionette"},"fly/libs/underscore-1.5.1":{"exports":"_"},"fly/libs/backbone-1.0.0":{"deps":["version!fly/libs/underscore","jquery"],"exports":"Backbone"},"libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tabs-1.11.4":["jquery","version!libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.core","version!fly/libs/jquery.widget"],"libs/jquery/flexslider-2.1":["jquery"],"libs/dataTables.fixedColumns-3.0.4":["jquery","version!libs/dataTables"],"libs/dataTables.fixedHeader-2.1.2":["jquery","version!libs/dataTables"],"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/app/VideoPlayer/AdobePass-min.js":["https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/util/Utils-min.js"]},"map":{"*":{"adobe-pass":"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/app/VideoPlayer/AdobePass-min.js","facebook":"https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js","facebook-debug":"https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all/debug.js","google":"https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js","google-platform":"https://apis.google.com/js/client:platform.js","google-csa":"https://www.google.com/adsense/search/async-ads.js","google-javascript-api":"https://www.google.com/jsapi","google-client-api":"https://apis.google.com/js/api:client.js","gpt":"https://securepubads.g.doubleclick.net/tag/js/gpt.js","hlsjs":"https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/hls.js/1.0.7/hls.js","newsroom":"https://c2.taboola.com/nr/cbsinteractive-cbssports/newsroom.js","recaptcha":"https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?onload=loadRecaptcha&render=explicit","recaptcha_ajax":"https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api/js/recaptcha_ajax.js","supreme-golf":"https://sgapps-staging.supremegolf.com/search/assets/js/bundle.js","taboola":"https://cdn.taboola.com/libtrc/cbsinteractive-cbssports/loader.js","twitter":"https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js","video-avia":"https://vidtech.cbsinteractive.com/avia-js/1.14.0/player/avia.min.js","video-avia-ui":"https://vidtech.cbsinteractive.com/avia-js/1.14.0/plugins/ui/avia.ui.min.js","video-avia-gam":"https://vidtech.cbsinteractive.com/avia-js/1.14.0/plugins/gam/avia.gam.min.js","video-ima3":"https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/sdkloader/ima3.js","video-ima3-dai":"https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/sdkloader/ima3_dai.js","video-utils":"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/util/Utils-min.js","video-vast-tracking":"https://vidtech.cbsinteractive.com/sb55/vast-js/vtg-vast-client.js"}},"waitSeconds":300});



Read original article here

Xi had opportunity to urge Putin to pursue Ukraine diplomacy in meeting -U.S. official

Members of the Chinese delegation led by President Xi Jinping attend a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin and other officials in Beijing, China February 4, 2022. Sputnik/Mikhail Klimentyev/Kremlin via REUTERS

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

WASHINGTON, Feb 4 (Reuters) – A meeting between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Beijing should have been an opportunity for China to encourage Russia to de-escalate tensions with Ukraine, the U.S. State Department’s top diplomat for East Asia, Daniel Kritenbrink, said on Friday.

Such an approach is what the world expects from “responsible powers,” Kritenbrink told reporters of the meeting that led to China and Russia proclaiming a deep strategic partnership.

Kritenbrink said the meeting and joint statement that followed reflected an approach that China and Russia had taken for some time, “namely to move closer together.”

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

“The meeting should have provided China the opportunity to encourage Russia to pursue diplomacy and de-escalation in Ukraine.” Kritenbrink said.

“If Russia further invades Ukraine and China looks the other way, it suggests that China is willing to tolerate or tacitly support Russia’s efforts to coerce Ukraine, even when they embarrass Beijing, harm European security and risk global peace and economic stability.”

The China-Russia agreement marked the most detailed and assertive statement of Russian and Chinese resolve to work together – and against the United States – to build a new international order based on their own interpretations of human rights and democracy. read more

They pledged mutual protection of core interests – an apparent reference to Russia and Ukraine and Taiwan, a self-ruled island Beijing claims as its own.

The joint statement is also strongly critical of U.S. moves to stand up to China’s growing power in the Indo-Pacific region through the AUKUS pact, under which the United States and Britain plan to provide Australia with nuclear-powered submarines.

It came as China’s Xi hosted Putin on the opening day of the Beijing Winter Olympics. Washington announced a diplomatic boycott of the Games to protest what it describes as China’s ongoing genocide against Muslim minorities.

On Thursday, the U.S. State Department warned Russia that a closer relationship with Beijing would not make up for consequences imposed in response to an invasion of Ukraine and that Chinese firms would face consequences if they sought to evade export controls imposed on Moscow in that event. read more

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Humeyra Pamuk, Simon Lewis and David Brunnstrom; Editing by Chris Reese and Alistair Bell

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

James Harden Rumors: 76ers to Pursue Star at Trade Deadline; Nets Open to Deal | Bleacher Report

Thearon W. Henderson/Getty Images

The Philadelphia 76ers are reportedly expected to pursue Brooklyn Nets guard James Harden until Thursday’s NBA trade deadline, according to The Athletic’s Shams Charania.

Brooklyn is “believed to be open to discussing a deal,” Charania added, and there’s an expectation that the teams will begin discussing a potential Harden-for-Ben Simmons swap this week. 

Charania mentioned that Tyrese Maxey, Seth Curry and Matisse Thybulle could “sweeten a potential package” for Harden. However, he noted there’s “no urgency for Nets officials” to move the veteran because they believe the current roster is championship-worthy. 

Though “it’s believed an opening exists should an offer elevate the team and make the roster more well-rounded,” Charania reported.

This is a change in pace for the Sixers, who were reportedly expected to target Harden during the offseason. NBA insider Marc Stein wrote last month that Sixers president of basketball operations Daryl Morey might be interested in keeping Simmons beyond the deadline in order to pursue a sign-and-trade for Harden during the offseason. 

In addition, Morey himself said in January that trading Simmons at the deadline was “less likely than likely.” 

As for Harden, it’s possible he’d welcome a trade to the Sixers because of his relationship with Morey. The two developed a strong bond during their time together with the Houston Rockets from 2012-20. 

In addition, B/R’s Jake Fischer reported last month that while Harden remains invested in competing for a title in Brooklyn, he “informed several confidants” that he’s willing to consider other teams in the offseason. The three-time scoring champion has a player option worth more than $47 million for the 2022-23 campaign.

Fischer also reported Harden has been “vocal” in airing out his frustrations about Kyrie Irving only being available to participate in road games because of his vaccination status. Irving is unable to compete in home games because he has refused the COVID-19 vaccine and New York City requires vaccination to enter large indoor events.

Harden also reportedly has problems with head coach Steve Nash’s “fluid rotations” and has not enjoyed living in Brooklyn, per Fischer. The 32-year-old is in just his first full season with the Nets after the Rockets traded him to the franchise during the 2020-21 campaign. 

Through 44 games this season, Harden is averaging 22.5 points, eight rebounds and 10.2 assists while shooting 41.4 percent from the floor and 33.2 percent from deep. It’s been his worst season since the 2011-12 campaign when he was a member of the Oklahoma City Thunder and averaged just 16.8 points per game. 

Harden would be a good fit for the Sixers, who are missing a seasoned veteran at the point. If he was paired with Joel Embiid, the duo has the potential to lead Philly to dominance in the Eastern Conference. 

However, as Charania wrote, the Sixers will likely have to be willing to part ways with someone like Maxey to facilitate a deal. Whether they’d be willing to do that, given his performance this season, remains unclear. 

It’s also unclear if Simmons, who would be sent to Brooklyn in the deal, would be willing to play this season. He demanded a trade from the Sixers before the 2021-22 campaign and has been away from the team and told the team in October he wasn’t mentally ready to play. 



Read original article here

Anthony Davis injury: Five big men Lakers could pursue on trade market to fill in for absent star

There’s not exactly a good time to lose your All-NBA big man, but the Los Angeles Lakers really couldn’t have asked for worse timing on Anthony Davis’ latest injury. The NBA’s recent COVID-19 outbreak has desperate teams nabbing every worthwhile free agent, so it’s not as though the Lakers can easily look to the free-agent pool to find a replacement center while Davis recovers for the next month or so. Their own internal options aren’t particularly appealing either. DeAndre Jordan lost his spot in the rotation for good reason before desperation got him minutes back. Dwight Howard is currently out due to the NBA’s health and safety protocols. Two-way rookie Jay Huff has played just 13 minutes this season. 

The one saving grace for the Lakers is the date on the calendar. With Dec. 15 now in the rearview mirror, the majority of NBA players are now trade-eligible. The Lakers have neither the assets nor the matching salary to swing a blockbuster for a new big man, but beggars can’t be choosers. A reliable 15 minutes per night in the frontcourt would be enormously valuable right now. So let’s explore what’s realistically out there on the trade market right now for a package of second-round picks and minimal matching salary (let’s say no more than two minimum-salaried Lakers going out, which would allow the Lakers to absorb around $4.3 million in salary). Given the COVID situation that the entire league is facing right now, teams very well might decide to hoard their players and eschew trades entirely until they can more comfortably rely on their players to be available. The Lakers might just be out of luck if that’s the case, but these five players at least make a modicum of sense as hypothetical trade targets. 

Here’s the pie in the sky target. Mitchell Robinson is absolutely overqualified for injury-replacement trade target status, and the New York Knicks almost certainly wouldn’t take a package of second-round picks back for him even considering his underwhelming season. Even if they would, it’s worth noting that Robinson recently fired Rich Paul as his agent, so whatever influence Klutch Sports holds in the front office would likely be used against him, and he’s having arguably his worst season as a pro after gaining 20 pounds in the offseason. He’s still worth a phone call, though, for the following reasons:

  • Robinson recently lost his starting job in New York to Nerlens Noel. The Knicks also have reigning All-NBA power forward Julius Randle, recent draft picks Obi Toppin and Jericho Sims, and long-time Tom Thibodeau favorite Taj Gibson in the front-court.
  • Robinson has recently posted cryptic messages on social media complaining about his role.
  • Robinson is going to be an unrestricted free agent this offseason. If he wants to get a hefty contract, it is in his best interest to make sure that he ends the season on a team that plans to make use of his Bird Rights in order to retain him because there is very little cap space available around the league. That might be the Knicks, but if it’s not, he might prefer a trade. 
  • The Lakers were heavily linked to Robinson during the pre-draft process in 2018. There were even reports that they made him a promise with the No. 25 overall pick. That pick comes with its own messy history, as there was reportedly dissension within the front office between Mo Wagner, whom they actually picked, and Omari Spellman, whom Lakers scouts reportedly preferred. Robinson fell to No. 36. 

So… there’s some smoke here. It’s worth making a phone call to find out if there’s any fire. The Knicks could almost certainly get more than the Lakers would be able to offer if they put Robinson out there, and if Robinson wants a bigger offensive role, he’s probably not going to find it in Los Angeles. But the Lakers sorely need athletic upside in the frontcourt and Robinson provides a boatload of it. He’s also playing for a new contract, so any acquiring team should expect him to do his best to fit in. Robinson probably couldn’t play alongside Davis and Russell Westbrook given his very traditional offensive role as a non-shooting roller and rebounder, but if he recaptures his old defensive form, he could make a world of difference on that end of the floor. 

Here’s where the more realistic targets come into play. The Lakers had Damian Jones in the building briefly last season, but let him go to make way for Andre Drummond on the buyout market. They almost immediately regretted that decision. Drummond underwhelmed. His presence alienated Marc Gasol. Jones thrived in an expanded role in Sacramento. That role has since shrunk, though. He’s appeared in only 14 games for the Kings this season, and the Kings have a surprisingly crowded frontcourt now that Tristan Thompson is in town and Marvin Bagley III has re-emerged as a rotation player. The Kings are so bogged down by the COVID protocols that they’re likely at least a week away from even considering a deal, but if they aren’t going to use Jones, grabbing a draft pick for him makes plenty of sense. 

But after this offseason’s Buddy Hield debacle, the Kings probably aren’t going to be too eager to help the Lakers. Their decision to back out of a deal that was, by all accounts, nearly finished reportedly left Kings management “steaming.” The NBA is a relationship business. Rob Pelinka knows that well as a former agent, and the Lakers have a number of fruitful relationships around the league. The Wizards, for instance, helped them create max cap space in 2020, so the Lakers turned around and helped them land Spencer Dinwiddie in 2021 without getting anything in return. The Kings might not be willing to play ball here.

3. Mo Wagner

We’re sticking with former Lakers here but otherwise going in a very different direction. Wagner was a cap casualty as the Lakers scrambled to create max cap space in 2020 and he’s struggled to catch on anywhere since. The Magic are his fourth NBA team, and though his role is minor, it’s been fairly consistent, and with his brother Franz in place as a core piece of Orlando’s future, the Magic probably wouldn’t deal him for scraps. Still, Mo Bamba and Wendell Carter Jr. (when healthy) are clearly ahead of him in the pecking order, and Robin Lopez is perfectly capable of playing more than he has for the Magic. 

Wagner shares very little in common with Jones or Robinson. They are archetypical centers, but Wagner is more of a stretch center. He’s struggled in that role for most of his NBA career, but he’s now up to 37 percent from behind the arc this season. He has untapped mobility defensively, so while he may not be much of a rim protector, Frank Vogel could surely find some more creative schematic uses for him. With or without Davis, this is the sort of big man the Lakers probably should have had on their bench from the get-go. He not only fits more easily alongside Westbrook but contrasts stylistically with Howard. The Lakers sorely lack lineup versatility, and Wagner could provide a bit of it.

The Hawks signed Gorgui Dieng primarily to hold them over at backup center until Onyeka Okongwu returned. Well… Onyeka Okongwu has returned, and it’s not as though Dieng has lit the world on fire in his place. His role has steadily shrunk all season, and now in his 30s, there’s no telling how much he actually has left to contribute to a winning team. At a bare minimum, the Hawks probably wouldn’t haggle too much over him. They’d probably welcome the salary savings of dealing him.

But Dieng, on a limited scale, has in the past filled that coveted unicorn role of the shot-blocking big man that can make 3-pointers. He’s made nearly 38 percent of his long-range attempts over the past three seasons, though the volume has been fairly limited. His defense has slipped a fair bit in that time, and if that’s a priority, the Lakers will probably look elsewhere. But the best version of Dieng can play with Westbrook and Davis on the floor, and there just aren’t that many bargain-basement centers that can say that. 

5. Whichever Dallas center is available

Jason Kidd may be using Kristaps Porzingis at power forward more than Rick Carlisle ever did, but that doesn’t mean he needs all of his centers. Dwight Powell and Maxi Kleber are also using center minutes, and that has left very few for Willie Cauley-Stein, Boban Marjanovic and Moses Brown. The three have barely combined to play as many minutes (350) as DeAndre Jordan (314). 

The Lakers can’t exactly be picky here. Any of the three could play a role for them. Cauley-Stein’s mobility and verticality probably make him the most appealing of the three, but if they want to keep using small bench lineups with both James and Westbrook taking advantage of maximized spacing, Marjanovic could at least create some shots in the minutes they need to rest. Brown, a double-double machine for the desperate Thunder a year ago, probably has the most upside.

require.config({"baseUrl":"https://sportsfly.cbsistatic.com/fly-0126/bundles/sportsmediajs/js-build","config":{"version":{"fly/components/accordion":"1.0","fly/components/alert":"1.0","fly/components/base":"1.0","fly/components/carousel":"1.0","fly/components/dropdown":"1.0","fly/components/fixate":"1.0","fly/components/form-validate":"1.0","fly/components/image-gallery":"1.0","fly/components/iframe-messenger":"1.0","fly/components/load-more":"1.0","fly/components/load-more-article":"1.0","fly/components/load-more-scroll":"1.0","fly/components/loading":"1.0","fly/components/modal":"1.0","fly/components/modal-iframe":"1.0","fly/components/network-bar":"1.0","fly/components/poll":"1.0","fly/components/search-player":"1.0","fly/components/social-button":"1.0","fly/components/social-counts":"1.0","fly/components/social-links":"1.0","fly/components/tabs":"1.0","fly/components/video":"1.0","fly/libs/easy-xdm":"2.4.17.1","fly/libs/jquery.cookie":"1.2","fly/libs/jquery.throttle-debounce":"1.1","fly/libs/jquery.widget":"1.9.2","fly/libs/omniture.s-code":"1.0","fly/utils/jquery-mobile-init":"1.0","fly/libs/jquery.mobile":"1.3.2","fly/libs/backbone":"1.0.0","fly/libs/underscore":"1.5.1","fly/libs/jquery.easing":"1.3","fly/managers/ad":"2.0","fly/managers/components":"1.0","fly/managers/cookie":"1.0","fly/managers/debug":"1.0","fly/managers/geo":"1.0","fly/managers/gpt":"4.3","fly/managers/history":"2.0","fly/managers/madison":"1.0","fly/managers/social-authentication":"1.0","fly/utils/data-prefix":"1.0","fly/utils/data-selector":"1.0","fly/utils/function-natives":"1.0","fly/utils/guid":"1.0","fly/utils/log":"1.0","fly/utils/object-helper":"1.0","fly/utils/string-helper":"1.0","fly/utils/string-vars":"1.0","fly/utils/url-helper":"1.0","libs/jshashtable":"2.1","libs/select2":"3.5.1","libs/jsonp":"2.4.0","libs/jquery/mobile":"1.4.5","libs/modernizr.custom":"2.6.2","libs/velocity":"1.2.2","libs/dataTables":"1.10.6","libs/dataTables.fixedColumns":"3.0.4","libs/dataTables.fixedHeader":"2.1.2","libs/dateformat":"1.0.3","libs/waypoints/infinite":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/inview":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/jquery.waypoints":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/sticky":"3.1.1","libs/jquery/dotdotdot":"1.6.1","libs/jquery/flexslider":"2.1","libs/jquery/lazyload":"1.9.3","libs/jquery/maskedinput":"1.3.1","libs/jquery/marquee":"1.3.1","libs/jquery/numberformatter":"1.2.3","libs/jquery/placeholder":"0.2.4","libs/jquery/scrollbar":"0.1.6","libs/jquery/tablesorter":"2.0.5","libs/jquery/touchswipe":"1.6.18","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.core":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.draggable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.mouse":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.position":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.slider":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.sortable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.touch-punch":"0.2.3","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.autocomplete":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.accordion":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tabs":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.menu":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.dialog":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.resizable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.button":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tooltip":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.effects":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.datepicker":"1.11.4"}},"shim":{"liveconnection/managers/connection":{"deps":["liveconnection/libs/sockjs-0.3.4"]},"liveconnection/libs/sockjs-0.3.4":{"exports":"SockJS"},"libs/setValueFromArray":{"exports":"set"},"libs/getValueFromArray":{"exports":"get"},"fly/libs/jquery.mobile-1.3.2":["version!fly/utils/jquery-mobile-init"],"libs/backbone.marionette":{"deps":["jquery","version!fly/libs/underscore","version!fly/libs/backbone"],"exports":"Marionette"},"fly/libs/underscore-1.5.1":{"exports":"_"},"fly/libs/backbone-1.0.0":{"deps":["version!fly/libs/underscore","jquery"],"exports":"Backbone"},"libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tabs-1.11.4":["jquery","version!libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.core","version!fly/libs/jquery.widget"],"libs/jquery/flexslider-2.1":["jquery"],"libs/dataTables.fixedColumns-3.0.4":["jquery","version!libs/dataTables"],"libs/dataTables.fixedHeader-2.1.2":["jquery","version!libs/dataTables"],"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/app/VideoPlayer/AdobePass-min.js":["https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/util/Utils-min.js"]},"map":{"*":{"adobe-pass":"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/app/VideoPlayer/AdobePass-min.js","facebook":"https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js","facebook-debug":"https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all/debug.js","google":"https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js","google-platform":"https://apis.google.com/js/client:platform.js","google-csa":"https://www.google.com/adsense/search/async-ads.js","google-javascript-api":"https://www.google.com/jsapi","google-client-api":"https://apis.google.com/js/api:client.js","gpt":"https://securepubads.g.doubleclick.net/tag/js/gpt.js","newsroom":"https://c2.taboola.com/nr/cbsinteractive-cbssports/newsroom.js","recaptcha":"https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?onload=loadRecaptcha&render=explicit","recaptcha_ajax":"https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api/js/recaptcha_ajax.js","supreme-golf":"https://sgapps-staging.supremegolf.com/search/assets/js/bundle.js","taboola":"https://cdn.taboola.com/libtrc/cbsinteractive-cbssports/loader.js","twitter":"https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js","video-avia":"https://vidtech.cbsinteractive.com/avia-js/1.9.0/player/avia.min.js","video-avia-cvui":"https://vidtech.cbsinteractive.com/avia-js/1.9.0/legacy/cvui/cvui.min.js","video-ima3":"https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/sdkloader/ima3.js","video-ima3-dai":"https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/sdkloader/ima3_dai.js","video-utils":"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/util/Utils-min.js","video-vast-tracking":"https://vidtech.cbsinteractive.com/sb55/vast-js/vtg-vast-client.js"}},"waitSeconds":300});



Read original article here

France beefs up sea rescue work, migrants vow to pursue UK quest

  • Twenty-seven migrants died when their dinghy deflated
  • Britain and France trade blame over the incident
  • Macron says France is beefing up sea rescue operations

DUNKIRK, France/ZAGREB, Nov 25 (Reuters) – France said on Thursday it will beef up the surveillance of its northern shores, but migrants huddling in makeshift camps said neither that nor a tragic drowning the day before would stop them from trying to cross the Channel to Britain.

Seventeen men, seven women and three teenagers died on Wednesday when their dinghy deflated in the Channel, one of many such risky journeys attempted in rickety, overloaded boats by people fleeing poverty and war in Afghanistan, Iraq and beyond.

The deaths deepened animosity between Britain and France, already at odds over Brexit, with Prime Minister Boris Johnson saying France was at fault and French Interior Minister Gerald Darmanin accusing Britain of “bad immigration management”.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to reuters.com

Register

With relations fraught over Brexit and immigration, much of the focus on Thursday was on who should bear responsibility, even if both sides vowed to seek joint solutions.

President Emmanuel Macron defended Paris’s actions but said France was merely a transit country for many migrants and more European cooperation was needed to tackle illegal immigration.

“I will … say very clearly that our security forces are mobilised day and night,” Macron said during a visit to the Croatian capital Zagreb, promising “maximum mobilisation” of French forces, with reservists and drones watching the coast.

“But above all, we need to seriously strengthen cooperation … with Belgium, the Netherlands, Britain and the European Commission.”

“MAYBE WE DIE”

Wednesday’s incident was the worst of its kind on record in the waterway separating Britain and France, one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes.

But migrants in a small makeshift camp in the outskirts of Dunkirk, near the seashore, said they would keep trying to reach Britain, no matter the risks.

“Yesterday is sad and it is scary but we have to go by boat, there is no other way,” said 28-year old Manzar, a Kurd from Iran, huddled by a fire alongside a few friends.

“Maybe it’s dangerous, maybe we die, but maybe it will be safe. We have to try our chance. It’s a risk, we already know it is a risk,” said the young man, who left Iran six months ago and arrived in France 20 days ago, after walking across Europe.

A damaged inflatable dinghy and a sleeping bag abandonned by migrants are seen on the beach near Wimereux, France, November 24, 2021. REUTERS/Gonzalo Fuentes

Read More

Britain on Thursday repeated an offer to have joint British-French patrols off the French coast near Calais.

Paris has resisted such calls and it is unclear whether it will change its mind five months before a presidential election in which migration and security are important topics.

They are also sensitive issues in Britain, where Brexit campaigners told voters that leaving the European Union would mean regaining control of the country’s borders. London has in the past threatened to cut financial support for France’s border policing if Paris fails to stem the flow of migrants.

One smuggler arrested overnight had bought dinghies in Germany, and many cross via Belgium before reaching France’s northern shores on their way to Britain, French officials said.

EU Migration Commissioner Ylva Johansson said she would talk to Darmanin later on Thursday to offer financial help and assistance from the bloc’s border guard force Frontex.

‘A TRAGEDY THAT WE DREADED’

Rescue volunteers and rights groups said such drowning incidents were to be expected as smugglers and migrants take more risks to avoid a growing police presence.

“To accuse only the smugglers is to hide the responsibility of the French and British authorities,” the Auberge de Migrants NGO said. It and other NGOs pointed to a lack of legal migration routes and added security at the Eurotunnel undersea rail link, which has pushed migrants to try the perilous sea crossing.

“This a tragedy that we dreaded, that was expected, we had sounded the alarm,” said Bernard Barron, head of the Calais region SNSM, a volunteer group which rescues people at sea.

But Britain rejected one of the NGOs’ main demands.

Providing a safe route for migrants to claim asylum from France would only add to pull factors encouraging people to make dangerous journeys, Johnson’s spokesman said when asked about the possibility of a safe means of claiming asylum from France.

The number of migrants crossing the Channel has surged to 25,776 so far in 2021, up from 8,461 in 2020 and 1,835 in 2019, according to the BBC, citing government data.

Before Wednesday’s disaster, 14 people had drowned this year trying to reach Britain, a French official said. In 2020, seven people died and two disappeared, while in 2019 four died.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Ardee Napolitano in Calais, Lucien Libert in Zagreb, Alistair Smout, Paul Sandle and Kylie MacLellan in London, Richard Lough and Sudip Kar-Gupta in Paris, Gabriel Baczynska in Brussels; Writing by Ingrid Melander; Editing by Mike Collett-White, Timothy Heritage, Giles Elgood, William Maclean

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Source: Panthers have no plans to pursue Deshaun Watson, never considered offering Christian McCaffrey

Getty Images

The Panthers may eventually make a move for Deshaun Watson. It won’t happen before Tuesday’s trade deadline.

Per a source with direct knowledge of the team’s thinking, the Panthers have no plans to pursue the Texans quarterback before Tuesday at 4:00 p.m. ET. The source also explained that the Panthers never offered or considered offering running back Christian McCaffrey as part of a trade package.

This directly contradicts the key aspects of Friday’s report from Jason La Canfora of CBS Sports. He claimed that acquiring Watson remains “a priority” for owner David Tepper, and that the team was prepared to offer McCaffrey in order to get it done.

While “no plans” necessarily leaves the door open for a deal, a lot would have to happen at this point. First, Watson would have to want to play for the Panthers, and he currently does not. (La Canfora’s item ignores Watson’s no-trade clause.) Second, the Panthers and Texans would have to work out a deal. Third, the Panthers presumably would want to do a little more homework on Watson before pulling the trigger, including for example sitting down with him for a conversation. There’s not much time, and the clock keeps ticking (as it always does).

This doesn’t mean the Panthers won’t resurface as a potential Watson suitor in the offseason, if the Dolphins and Texans can’t land the plane before Tuesday afternoon.

Read original article here

As Steve Bannon faces subpoena deadline, January 6 panel prepares to immediately pursue criminal charges

Bannon’s lawyer on Wednesday wrote a letter to the panel saying that his client will not provide testimony or documents until the committee reaches an agreement with former President Donald Trump over executive privilege or a court weighs in on the matter. “That is an issue between the committee and President Trump’s counsel and Mr. Bannon is not required to respond at this time,” attorney Robert Costello wrote.

If Bannon is a no-show, the committee is expected to immediately begin seeking a referral for criminal contempt after the subpoena deadline passes — essentially making an example of Bannon’s noncompliance as the House seeks more witnesses, sources familiar with the planning told CNN.

While it could take some time before the House sends such a referral to the Department of Justice, the committee could take initial steps within hours of the panel’s stated deadline — which is Thursday — if Bannon refuses to cooperate, the sources added, underscoring the growing sense of urgency around the investigation itself.

CNN reported Wednesday that the committee is unified in its plan to seek criminal charges against those who refuse to comply, and lawmakers have specifically honed in on Bannon while discussing the option publicly.

“The reason why some of these witnesses, people like Steve Bannon, who have been public about their contempt for Congress feel they can get away with it is for four years, they did,” committee member Rep. Adam Schiff told MSNBC on Wednesday.

Schiff, who also chairs the Intelligence Committee, noted that Bannon had refused to cooperate with the House’s Russia investigation during the Trump administration because he “would never be held in contempt.”

“He would never be prosecuted by the Trump Justice Department. But those days are over. And I view that not only as essential to our investigation but I also view this, the enforcement of the rule of law, as an early test of whether our democracy is recovering,” the California Democrat added.

CNN legal analyst Norm Eisen swiftly pushed back on Costello’s letter Wednesday, saying, “It’s just wrong. The letter quotes a case saying ‘the President’ can make executive privilege determinations. But Trump is no longer ‘the President.’ In the United States, we only have one of those at a time, he is Joe Biden, and he has not asserted privilege here.”

Three other Trump allies also face subpoena deadlines this week. Two of them, Trump’s former chief of staff Mark Meadows and former administration official Kash Patel, have been “engaging” with the committee, according to the panel, though it remains unclear if that contact amounts to any form of cooperation. Patel is not expected to appear for his scheduled deposition with the committee on Thursday, multiple sources familiar with the plans tell CNN.

The committee was able only recently to serve Trump’s former deputy chief of staff Dan Scavino a subpoena, a source familiar with the matter told CNN, and his deadline to appear for a deposition has likely been delayed.

As to whether Meadows and Patel will appear before the panel for their depositions later this week, committee member Rep. Stephanie Murphy, a Florida Democrat, said, “My expectation is that they will do the patriotic thing and appear before the committee, and if they don’t have anything to hide, there’s no reason why they won’t show up.”

‘Looking forward to Steve Bannon’s deposition’

Bannon has not been cooperating so far and lawmakers took the opportunity ahead of Thursday’s deadline to reiterate that he is obligated to do so.

“Looking forward to Steve Bannon’s deposition tomorrow and receiving all the testimony and evidence we subpoenaed,” select committee member Rep. Jamie Raskin, a Maryland Democrat, said Wednesday in a tweet. “This is a legal order as well as a civic duty to share info about the most sweeping violent attack on Congress since the War of 1812.”

In a letter to the committee earlier this month, Bannon’s attorney argued that “the executive privileges belong to President Trump” and “we must accept his direction and honor his invocation of executive privilege.”

The letter from Bannon’s legal team goes on to say it may be up to the courts to decide whether he is ultimately forced to cooperate — essentially daring the House to sue or hold him in criminal contempt.

“As such, until these issues are resolved, we are unable to respond to your request for documents and testimony,” wrote the lawyer, Robert Costello.

The claim that Bannon could be covered by the former President’s privilege is unusual, because Bannon was not working for the federal government during the period surrounding the January 6 insurrection.

Privilege claims normally apply to close officials around the President and deliberations between government employees, and Bannon was fired from his role as a White House adviser in 2017.

Many legal experts agree with the committee that Bannon, as a private citizen, would have no standing to block a subpoena by claiming executive privilege.

Historic criminal contempt cases

As severe as a criminal contempt referral sounds, the House’s choice to use the Justice Department may be more of a warning shot than a solution. Holding Bannon in criminal contempt through a prosecution could take years, and historic criminal contempt cases have been derailed by appeals and acquittals.

“They’re in a box, in a way,” Stanley Brand, a former House general counsel, said on Wednesday. “Any way they go is a legal donnybrook, potentially that will take time.”

Congress almost never forces a recalcitrant witness into testifying through prosecution, according to several longtime Washington attorneys familiar with congressional proceedings.
An Environmental Protection Agency official in the Reagan administration was the last person indicted for criminal contempt of Congress. The DC US Attorney’s Office of the Justice Department took eight days from receiving the House’s contempt referral for Rita Lavelle in 1983 to having a grand jury indict her. Lavelle fought the charges to trial, and a jury found her not guilty.
At least one other criminal contempt proceeding predating Lavelle, during the anti-communist McCarthy-era investigations of the 1950s, was overturned by the Supreme Court on appeal. In more recent administrations, the Justice Department has declined to prosecute contempt referrals — though in those situations, Congress has made contempt referrals on members of the sitting president’s administration.

“I’m watching people on TV bloviate about this. They’re going to send [Bannon] to criminal contempt. OK. Fine. That just starts the case,” Brand, who was the House general counsel during Lavelle’s contempt proceedings, told CNN. “There’s a trial. It’s not automatic they’re going to get convicted.”

The criminal contempt approach also is structured to be more of a punishment than an attempt to compel a witness to speak.

“It’s not like civil contempt, where you hold the keys to your jail cell and get released” if a witness agrees to testify, Brand said.

Instead, the House essentially loses control of the case as the Justice Department takes over to prosecute.

“They don’t have any time,” Brand added. “They’ve got to get this done before next year, before there’s an election.”

CNN’s Christie Johnson contributed to this report.

Read original article here