Tag Archives: purchases

CVS and Walgreens to limit purchases of at-home Covid tests

The rapid spread of the Omicron coronavirus variant ahead of the holidays has sparked the surge — and there has been anecdotal evidence over the past week of test shortages at stores across the country.

Amazon said it’s limiting purchases of its own at-home Covid-19 test collection kits to 10 on its online marketplace. Amazon’s third-party sellers on the site set their own quantity limits.

“We are working hard to secure additional Covid-19 test inventory” from sellers, a spokesperson said.

Walmart has high stock levels of Covid-19 tests in stores, but is more constrained online, a spokesperson said. It has not placed purchase limits on Covid-19 tests in stores nationally, but is capping testing kits at 8 for online orders.

CVS acknowledged in a statement on Tuesday that tests may be temporarily out of stock at its stores.

“To ensure equitable access to tests both in store and digitally, we’ve added a limit of six test kits per purchase,” the company said.

CVS has more than 9,900 stores across the US, although it announced last month that nearly 10% would be shut over the next three years.

“We’re committed to providing families with protection and peace of mind during the holiday season, and we continue to offer access to lab-based testing with results available in 1-2 days or rapid COVID-19 testing,” the statement said.

Walgreens said it’s limiting in-store and online purchases of at-home tests to four each time “due to the incredible demand for at-home rapid testing,” according to a statement on Tuesday.

“We ask that our customers please show patience and understanding as together, we continue to navigate the evolving pandemic environment,” Walgreens President John Standley said.

As of August 31, 2020, Walgreens has just above 9,000 stores.

On Tuesday, the Biden administration announced the purchase of a half-billion at-home rapid tests, which will be made available next month and will reach Americans through the mail.

Read original article here

Absolute Best Oculus Quest 2 Cyber Monday Deal: Free $50 Gift Card with Purchases

The best Cyber Monday deal on Oculus Quest 2 is still live. Basically, when you buy an Oculus Quest 2 from a participating retailer, you also get a $50 gift card. It’s free money. (see here).

This deal has been going on the whole week and was easily the most popular deal during Cyber Monday. As we transition into Cyber Monday it’s probably going to be one of the best deals for that sale, too.

Get a Free $50 Gift Card with Oculus Quest 2 Purchases

Black Friday Deal

Oculus Quest 2 + $50 Gift Card

Use promo code “OCULUS50”

14% off $349.00

The $50 gift cards are available with both the 128GB ($299) and 256GB ($399) models of Oculus Quest 2 (see here). Use the code OCULUS50 to claim your card at check out. It’s not a discount, but it is free money you can use toward other purchases, which everyone can agree is great.

VR is changing the gaming sphere in a huge way with support from publishers growing year by year. This is a fantastic opportunity to jump into the VR scene at the lowest possible price, so don’t miss out!

Editor’s Note: Oculus Quest 2 is also on sale in the Cyber Monday deals in the UK.

More Cyber Monday Deals to Check Out

All the Best Cyber Monday Deals and Sales

Robert Anderson is a deals expert and Commerce Editor for IGN. You can follow him @robertliam21 on Twitter.



Read original article here

CGI Merchant Group purchases Trump hotel in DC; expected to remove Trump name

The Miami group is expected to remove the Trump name from the ornate building located a short walk from the White House and is partnering with Hilton Worldwide Holdings to brand it a Waldorf Astoria, according to the person familiar. The deal is subject to approval by the General Services Administration (GSA), which will conduct a 60-day review, because the federal government owns the property.

The CGI Merchant Group declined to comment to CNN. CNN has reached out to the Trump Organization for comment.

Former President Donald Trump’s company had been in advanced talks with CGI Merchant Group this fall to sell the lease of the hotel, CNN previously reported.
Last month, the House Oversight Committee released documents showing the DC property, which attracted conservative lobbyists throughout the Trump presidency, lost $70 million while he was in office. (The former President had publicly claimed the hotel was making more than tens of millions of dollars.) The company has been trying to sell the property since 2019 but paused last year when the pandemic all but shuttered the hospitality industry.
The GSA, which manages federal buildings and land, awarded the lease for the Old Post Office building in 2012. Trump opened the hotel in 2016, when he was the Republican nominee for president.

Since then, the House Oversight Committee had been investigating conflicts of interest regarding GSA’s management of the Trump hotel lease.

When he took office, Trump resigned from his companies but transferred his assets to a trust run by his sons, allowing him to still benefit financially from the DC hotel and his other businesses.
In 2019, the inspector general of the GSA said the agency “ignored the Constitution” when deciding to maintain the lease of the building to the hotel after Trump was elected to the White House.

The documents released by the Oversight Committee showed the hotel received millions from foreign governments in payments and loan deferral, which Trump did not disclose, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest during his presidency.

The disclosure marked the first time that congressional investigators had reviewed and released details of the former President’s financial information, though the Trump Organization had challenged the committee’s understanding of accounting and denied any wrongdoing.

Read original article here

Online purchases boost U.S. retail sales; labor market recovering

People wearing protective masks shop at Macy’s Herald Square following the outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in the Manhattan borough of New York City, New York, U.S., December 26, 2020. REUTERS/Jeenah Moon/File Photo

  • Retail sales increase 0.7% in August
  • Core retail sales surge 2.5%; July revised down
  • Weekly jobless claims increase 20,000 to 332,000

WASHINGTON, Sept 16 (Reuters) – U.S. retail sales unexpectedly increased in August as a surge in online and furniture store purchases offset a continued decline at auto dealerships, which could temper expectations for a sharp slowdown in economic growth in the third quarter.

The surprise rebound in retail sales reported by the Commerce Department on Thursday came as economists have been downgrading their gross domestic product estimates for the current quarter, citing plunging motor vehicle sales, which are the result of an acute inventory shortage.

Sales last month were likely boosted by back-to-school shopping and child tax credit payments from the government.

“Consumer spending will continue to lead the economic recovery going forward,” said Gus Faucher, chief economist at PNC Financial in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Retail sales rose 0.7% last month. Data for July was revised down to show retail sales declining 1.8% instead of 1.1% as previously reported. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast retail sales would drop 0.8%. Sales increased 15.1% from a year ago and are well above their pre-pandemic level.

They are holding up even as spending is shifting back from goods to services like travel and entertainment, though soaring COVID-19 infections are likely delaying the services spending boom. Retail sales are mostly goods, with services such as healthcare, education, travel and hotel accommodation making up the remaining portion of consumer spending.

Online retail sales rebounded 5.3% after tumbling 4.6% in July. Most school districts started their 2021-2022 academic year in August, with in-person learning resuming after last year’s shift to online classes because of the pandemic.

Qualifying households in mid-July started receiving money under the expanded child tax credit program, which will run through December. Sales at clothing stores edged up 0.1% last month.

Sales at building material stores rose 0.9% and receipts at furniture stores increased 3.7%.

But sales at auto dealerships tumbled 3.6% after declining 4.6% in July. An ongoing global shortage of microchips, which is forcing automakers to cut production, is leading to a scarcity of inventory at showrooms.

The semiconductor crunch, which has been worsened by the latest wave of infections driven by the Delta variant of the coronavirus, primarily in Southeast Asia, is also causing shortages of some electronic goods. Congestion at ports in China is also adding to the supply bottlenecks.

But receipts at sporting goods, hobby, musical instrument and book stores dropped 2.7%. Sales at electronics and appliance stores fell 3.1%, likely because of shortages.

Sales at restaurants and bars were unchanged likely as soaring coronavirus cases kept people at home. Restaurants and bars are the only services category in the retail sales report.

Excluding automobiles, gasoline, building materials and food services, retail sales rebounded 2.5% last month after a downwardly revised 1.9% decline in July.

These so-called core retail sales correspond most closely to the consumer spending component of GDP. They were previously estimated to have dropped 1.0% in July.

U.S. stocks were trading slightly lower. The dollar (.DXY) rose against a basket of currencies. U.S. Treasury prices fell.

GROWTH ESTIMATES CUT

Tanking motor vehicle sales and struggles by businesses to replenish stocks have prompted economists to slash their GDP growth estimates for the third quarter.

On Wednesday, economists at JPMorgan again trimmed their third-quarter GDP growth forecast to a 5.0% annualized rate from a 7.0% pace. Goldman Sachs early this month cut its estimate to a 3.5% rate from a 5.25% pace.

The slowing momentum was corroborated by the Federal Reserve’s “Beige Book” report last week showing “economic growth downshifted slightly to a moderate pace in early July through August.” The economy grew at a 6.6% rate in the second quarter.

“We are expecting domestic demand to step up next quarter,” said Michael Feroli, chief U.S. economist at JPMorgan in New York. “This assumes the Delta headwind fades and that the issues afflicting the motor vehicle sector gradually abate.”

Americans are sitting on at least $2 trillion in excess savings accumulated during the pandemic. Wages are rising as companies scramble to fill a record 10.9 million job openings.

A separate report from the Labor Department on Thursday showed initial claims for state unemployment benefits increased 20,000 to a seasonally adjusted 332,000 for the week ended Sept. 11. Economists had forecast 330,000 applications for the latest week.

Claims were likely boosted by Hurricane Ida, which devastated U.S. offshore energy production and knocked out power in Louisiana. Ida, one of the most powerful hurricanes ever to strike the U.S. Gulf Coast, also drenched Mississippi and caused historic flooding in New York and New Jersey.

Claims have dropped from a record 6.149 million in early April 2020. A 200,000-250,000 range is viewed as consistent with healthy labor market conditions.

Reporting by Lucia Mutikani
Editing by Chizu Nomiyama and Paul Simao

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Fed’s George says it’s time to start tapering asset purchases

Kansas City Federal Reserve President Esther George said Thursday the U.S. central bank should begin winding down its massive bond-buying program as the U.S. economy continues to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic. 

Though George did not mention specifics about tapering the Fed’s $120 billion in monthly purchases Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities – including a start date or amounts – she suggested policymakers should begin sometime this year. 

“I’m less precise about amounts and dates, and really more focused on saying: Sooner rather than later,” she told FOX Business’ Edward Lawrence. “With a baseline outlook that suggests we’re going to continue to see job gains, continue to see strong growth, it suggests we can begin to make some of those adjustments this year.” 

FED BALANCE SHEET TOPS $8T FOR THE FIRST TIME

For months, the U.S. central bank has been grappling with conflicting economic data – surging inflation but slower-than-expected job growth, coupled with the new threat posed by the highly contagious delta variant – and when to begin unwinding the ultra-easy monetary policies implemented to keep the economy afloat in March 2020.

The issue has been complicated by a sharp divergence of opinions among members of the Federal Open Market Committee; minutes from the Fed’s July meeting show that while “most” officials are prepared to reduce the $120 billion in monthly asset purchases this year, others think it best to wait until 2022. 

George – who will be a voting member of the FOMC next year – is among the most hawkish Fed officials. She suggested that policymakers will provide further insight into reducing asset purchases during the Fed’s September meeting, which ends on Sept. 22.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS

“That adjustment process, the conversation about that is already underway,” she said. “I think the communication about that coming out of our September meeting will reflect the deliberations and the views of the committee on how that progress is being achieved.” 

Her comments come during the Fed’s annual economic symposium; while traditionally it’s held in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, the gathering was switched to a virtual single-day meeting at the last minute due to concerns about the highly contagious delta variant.  

Chairman Jerome Powell is slated to deliver a keynote speech Friday morning, although investors expect the Fed head to steer clear of tapering details.

“We probably won’t get clarity on the timing, magnitude and roadmap on tapering that the market is craving,” said Joe Brusuelas, RSM chief economist. “It’s been years since [Alan] Greenspan and [Ben] Bernanke utilized Jackson Hole to make major policy pronouncements that moved global financial markets.”

Read original article here

There’s growing support within the Fed to announce the tapering of bond purchases in September

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell adjusts his tie as he arrives to testify before a Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee hearing on “The Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress” on Capitol Hill in Washington, July 15, 2021.

Kevin Lamarque | Reuters

Shifting policy views amid unexpected economic data has opened the door for the Federal Reserve to announce in September a decision to taper its assets purchases and begin the reduction in buying a month or so after.

Interviews with officials along with their public comments show growing support for a faster taper timeline than markets had expected a month ago. Those changing views follow the strong jobs data of the past two months along with higher inflation readings.

Fed Governor Christopher Waller and Fed bank Presidents Eric Rosengren, Robert Kaplan and Jim Bullard have all publicly called for a September taper. Atlanta’s Raphael Bostic supported beginning the taper sometime between October and December, suggesting he could also favor a September announcement. The group is not known for being hawks and, in fact, some were among those making the earliest calls for historic Fed action to support the economy at the beginning of the pandemic.

The Fed could yet delay the decision to the November meeting if the August jobs data is weak, the delta variant sparks a new round of economic lockdowns or inflation readings ease off. But stronger-than-expected inflation data this past week, along with forecasts that it could remain high into next year, have bolstered support for the earlier taper announcement.

Markets have also shifted expectations, giving the Fed leeway to act sooner. Respondents to the CNBC Fed Survey in July pegged November as the announcement month and January as the beginning of the taper. But a Reuters poll last week found September to be the new consensus.

Powell on board?

Fed Chair Jerome Powell has generally been more dovish than some members of his committee have become, though he has not spoken since the recent data came out. Powell has offered some hints that he could be persuaded to go earlier. While he has insisted that the bulk of inflation would be temporary, he also said, “We have to take seriously the risk case, which is that inflation will be more persistent.”

Inflation readings this past week showed some moderation in consumer prices, but growing inflation pressures at the wholesale level. Some Fed officials now forecast higher inflation could persist into next year.

Powell said at his July press conference that the Fed was still “some way away from” the substantial further progress needed to taper, but that was before the July jobs report showing more than 900,000 jobs added, upward revisions to May and June and forecasts for continued strong payrolls growth. He has also said the decision to taper would be left up to the committee. In addition, Powell suggested the delta variant did not pose much risk to the economy.

Until recently, Powell’s main focus has been avoiding a taper tantrum, a repeat of the sharp 2013 bond market sell-off sparked by Fed Chair Ben Bernanke talking of an eventual reduction in asset purchases. But Powell appears to have achieved that goal. Fed officials have been openly talking about tapering for several months now and stocks have risen and bond yields, though volatile, have remained generally low.

Meanwhile, expectations for rate hikes beginning either late in 2022 or early 2023 have remained almost unchanged amid all the taper talk. That suggests to Fed officials that they have achieved their goal of divorcing in the market’s mind a decision to taper from a decision to raise rates.

A September taper could also meet Powell’s criteria of giving markets advanced notice. The Fed has acknowledged discussing the taper at both its June and July meeting. A September announcement with the taper beginning in October or November, would amount to four or five months of notice

A September decision could face opposition from several more dovish members of the committee. Chicago Fed President Charles Evans said last week he wanted to see “a few more months” of employment data before deciding. Fed Governor Lael Brainard indicated she wanted to see data from school openings and economic data from September.

Such differences are typical for the Fed around turning points in policy and it remains up to the chair to forge consensus or move forward with dissent. It appears Powell could face dissent in September with either decision. Powell could find support among doves with a slower taper, for example, one taking 10 months instead of eight. Or he could placate hawks with a faster taper and a delayed announcement.

And markets may yet have more to say. Because the Fed has said it would taper before hiking rates, a taper decision will immediately open the flood gates to discuss the first rate hike, potentially pulling forward rate hike expectations and tightening financial conditions faster than the Fed prefers.

Read original article here

Homebuyers turn to baby boomer parents to help with purchases

For Jessica Yourdon, a 36-year-old social media coordinator based in San Antonio, getting married last fall brought the promise of first-time homeownership. But with the pressure of paying for both a wedding and a home at the same time, Yourdon and her husband found herself relying on the financial help of her parents to cover the down payment on her new three-bedroom ranch — a move some experts say is becoming increasingly common as home prices skyrocket nationwide.

“It was really hard to accept when they wanted to give me money, and they’re like, ‘You’re our daughter. We love you, and it is our job to take care of you,’” Yourdon said. “Once it got to that point, I think when she said she wanted to do that, my husband and I were both speechless.”

Yourdon was not the first in her family to receive financial help for a recent home purchase. Her brother was also given money to pay for a down payment on a house, which Yourdon described as one of the biggest hurdles facing younger adults looking to become homeowners.

As millennials tackle rising home prices due to high demand and limited supply, they are purchasing homes less frequently and later than generations before them.

Millennials are not only becoming homeowners at lower rates, but they are also more commonly turning to others for help compared to prior generations. A 2018 study from financial services company Legal & General found that 43 percent of people under 35 received help from parents or family members when purchasing a home.

“It shows that there’s a belief and a commitment to the real estate market and parents willing to make a significant gift to their child to purchase in the market,” said Melissa Cohn, a mortgage banker at William Raveis Mortgage. “They feel that that’s a secure investment.”

According to the most recent S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller Index, home prices were 16.6 percent higher this past May than the year prior, the largest gain in 30 years. Smaller cities in particular have begun to see explosive growth, with people more frequently moving away from the coasts and into smaller metropolitan areas — and in turn driving up home prices.

Shut out

A July 2018 report from the Washington, D.C., based Urban Institute found that on average the rate of millennial homeownership was 8 percentage points lower than for baby boomers when they were the same age. This gap is even wider for minority households, whose rate of homeownership was found to be 15 percentage points lower than white millennials.

Millennials are also saddled with disproportionately high rates of student loan debt and are, on average, getting married later in life, thereby delaying homeownership. They are also facing high rent costs that put the promise of owning a home out of reach, according to the Urban Institute’s report.

Robert Dietz, chief economist for the National Association of Home Builders, said millennials are not only struggling to purchase homes because of rising prices — due in part to the increased cost of building materials like lumber — but also because of exclusionary zoning laws that prioritize the building of large properties over small starter homes.

These laws often come in the form of minimum lot sizes, Dietz said, making it harder to build small homes that often appeal to millennial buyers looking to make their first home purchase.

“Communities will often use minimum lot size requirements as a NIMBY-ist tool to reduce the amount of development,” Dietz said, using an acronym for the phrase “not in my backyard.” “The result then, if you’ve got a limited amount of lots because you’re requiring those lots to be larger, builders are more likely to build the larger homes first. So it’s the smaller, more entry-level home that tends to get crowded out.”

The impact of these policies, Dietz said, has made it so “entry-level housing, particularly housing intended for first-time and first-generation homebuyers, has been more difficult to build.”

Wealth accumulation

But as many millennials struggle to break into the housing market and pay off debt, those born in the baby boom generation — around 57 to 75 years old — have been accumulating money for years, putting them in control of 53 percent of the country’s total wealth. Baby boomers also, on average, have a far larger share of the country’s wealth than millennials when they were the same age — 21 percent compared to the millennials’ 4.6 percent.

What is one way baby boomers are ensuring the longevity of their income? By gifting it to their millennial children.

“You think about the wealth the boomers have accumulated and that kind of gap. We see more and more parents wanting to help their kids — their adult children — financially, [to] get financially set,” said Angie O’Leary, head of wealth planning at RBC Wealth Management. “And some of the ways that they’re doing that is through helping them with real estate.”

According to O’Leary, baby boomers control so much of the country’s wealth for three main reasons: They have a significant amount of money in retirement plans, invested heavily in the stock market over the past 30 to 35 years and bought bigger homes with greater value. These factors put many baby boomers in a sound enough financial position to pass down their wealth to their children, O’Leary said.

National trend

Real estate agents from New York to Nashville, Tennessee, say while they have always worked with clients whose parents gave them money to make a down payment or win a bidding war, they have been seeing it more frequently in recent years. As the pandemic sent the housing market spiraling, with home prices now at historically high levels, some say they expect this trend to continue.

Caroline Blankfort, a real estate agent based in Nashville, has worked with at least 15 clients in the past three years whose parents have given them money to purchase a home. Blankfort, who also worked as an agent in New York, said she has seen these gifts more frequently in Nashville, where the market is becoming increasingly competitive as the city grows in popularity.

Often, parents give their children money to pay a down payment or starter cost on a home, Blankfort said.

“It still is a chunk of change that some people don’t plan for when they’re working and saving,” Blankfort said. “And then when the time comes to buy a house, it’s like, ‘Oh, wait, hold on, I’m not ready for this.’”

Cohn, the mortgage banker with William Raveis Mortgage, has been in the industry for nearly 40 years and said she has seen the number of baby boomer gifts rise significantly over the past few. Some of these gifts, Cohn said, have exceeded $1 million, though the specific amounts vary from family to family.

Cohn said she expects these kinds of gifts to rise as long as housing prices remain high. The only factor that could potentially deter parents from giving their children money, she said, would be if gift tax laws change. The 2021 annual exclusion amount is $15,000, meaning a person will not face taxes if the gift is that amount or lower. If the amount is over $15,000, the person giving the gift must file a gift tax return with the Internal Revenue Service.

“I think the only way you would see them decline would be if they were no longer able to make a gift that would be tax-free,” Cohn said. “If that doesn’t change, I don’t see any reason why it should change.”

Read original article here

Robinhood raises $1 billion, will reopen GameStop stock purchases on Friday

Despite denials of any arrangement with big money Wall Street backers, there’s still widespread belief that the inability to purchase these specific companies has been coordinated to disadvantage retail stock traders. Meanwhile, some explanations dug into what happened with the Wallstreetbets subreddit, and the business model of a company like Robinhood, pointing out that their moves caused marketmakers and hedge funds to also participate and potentially profit from the frenzy.

Aptly named WeBull CEO Anthony Denier spoke to Yahoo Finance and said that temporarily restricting Koss, AMC and GameStop trades was not a “political decision” and instead had to do with “settlement mechanics in the market.” As he explained, they have to fund each trade with a central clearing house for two days, and the cost of the collateral to WeBull’s clearing firm became to expensive to front the cost on their trader’s behalf.

In a blog post, Robinhood said it made “a risk-management decision” and similarly stated in interviews that “We have SEC net capital requirements and clearing house deposits…Some of these requirements fluctuate quite a bit based on volatility in the market and they can be substantial in the current environment where there’s a lot of volatility and a lot of concentrated activity in these names that have been going viral on social media.”

In response to reports that Robinhood tapped its credit lines, CEO Vlad Tenev said his company had no liquidity issue, and that “we pulled those credit lines so that we could maximize within reason the funds we have to deposit at the clearing houses.” The New York Times reports Robinhood drew on credit lines of $500 to $600 million to meet lending requirements, and separately raised $1 billion in emergency funding on Thursday night in order to avoid having to place further limits on trades.



Read original article here