Tag Archives: prevent

Athletes to put on own Olympic medals in Tokyo to prevent virus spread

TOKYO — Athletes at the Tokyo Olympics will put their medals around their own necks to protect against spreading the coronavirus.

The “very significant change” to traditional medal ceremonies in the 339 events was revealed Wednesday by International Olympic Committee president Thomas Bach.

“The medals will not be given around the neck,” Bach told international media on a conference call from Tokyo. “They will be presented to the athlete on a tray, and then the athlete will take the medal him or herself.

“It will be made sure that the person who will put the medal on tray will do so only with disinfected gloves so that the athlete can be sure that nobody touched them before.”

The Olympic approach is different from soccer in Europe, where UEFA president Aleksander Ceferin has personally hung medals around the necks of players at competition finals in recent weeks.

Ceferin also shook hands with Italy’s standout goalkeeper Gianluigi Donnarumma at the Euro 2020 medal and trophy presentation in London on Sunday. Donnarumma’s save in a penalty shootout clinched the title for Italy against England.

Bach confirmed Wednesday that in Tokyo “there will be no shake-hands and there will be no hugs there during the ceremony.”

Olympic medals are typically presented by an IOC member or a leading official in a sport’s governing body.

The IOC had previously said medalists and ceremony officials would have to wear masks.

The Tokyo Olympics open July 23 in a state of emergency and rising numbers of COVID-19 cases in the city.

Read original article here

Diplomatic push is on to prevent another Israel-Hamas war in Gaza

On Monday, Lapid meet with the European Union Foreign Affairs Council, and the US said Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Palestinian and Israeli Affairs Hady Amr was in Israel and the Palestinian territories to meet with officials in Ramallah, Bethlehem, Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, including from the UN.

Egypt is brokering indirect talks between Israel and Hamas in an attempt to reach a permanent cease fire, or at the very least ensure a prolonged situation of calm. The United Nations is also involved in the process with support from the United States and the EU.

Among the issues stymieing progress is Israel’s demand that Hamas release the remains of two soldiers killed in the 2014 Gaza war and free two Israelis held hostage there.

Hamas wants the full restoration of the $30m. Qatari cash payments that in the past had been divided between impoverished Gaza families, fuel for the power plant and salaries for civil servants. Qatar has already funded $10 million in fuel for Gaza’s power plant. 

There is a mechanism by which Qatari funds can go to Gazan civilians and civilian projects through the UN, but not to Hamas civil servants, KAN News reported.

Israel wants a mechanism that would ensure that such cash transfers and the entry of goods into Gaza, especially dual-use items for construction, would not be diverted to Hamas for military use, such as the launching of rockets against the South and the construction of terrorist tunnels.

The international community also wants such a mechanism, but it is willing to have Israel fully reopen its two crossings into Gaza: the commercial one at Kerem Shalom and the pedestrian one at Erez. The UN maintains that the current mechanism is sufficient It’s humanitarian coordinator for the Palestinian territories Lynn Hastings said last Friday that the Gaza Reconstruction Mechanism (GRM) established after the 2014 Gaza war was effective in preventing Hamas from confiscating humanitarian aid and that no new mechanism was needed.

“Several large infrastructure projects, including those submitted and approved through the GRM prior to the escalation, are currently on hold due to the restrictions on importing the needed materials,” she said.

Israel had fully closed the Kerem Shalom and Erez crossings when the 11-day Gaza war broke out in May and has not yet allowed them to operate at prewar capacity. 

“Imports to the Gaza Strip from Israel of medical equipment, fishing equipment, raw materials for industry and textiles will be permitted via the Kerem Shalom crossing,” the Office for the Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) said Monday.

“Agricultural and textile exports from the Gaza Strip to Israel will be permitted as well,” it said.

“In light of the recent security calm, following a situational security assessment and with the approval of the political echelon, the fishing zone in the Gaza Strip will be extended from nine to 12 nautical miles, effective as of [Monday] morning,” COGAT said.

“The civilian measures approved by the political echelon are conditional upon the continued preservation of security stability,” it said.

The Palestinian Authority Foreign Ministry accused Israel of attempting to reignite Gaza violence through its restrictions at the crossings, particularly its ban on the entry of construction materials needed to rehabilitate Gaza.

“The Israeli blockade has led to sabotaging the lives of the Palestinian citizens and declining the level of basic services provided, under the pressure of Israeli delay and extortion,” it was quoted as saying by Wafa, the Palestinian News Agency.

Last Thursday Hastings visited Gaza. Upon her return to Jerusalem on Friday, she called on Israel to fully open the crossings.

“Without a return to the regular and predictable entry of goods into Gaza, the capacity of the UN and our partners to deliver critical interventions is at risk, as are the livelihoods of and basic services for the people in Gaza,” Hastings said.

“The UN currently estimates that 250,000 people are still without regular access to piped water and that 185,000 are relying on unsafe water sources or paying higher prices for bottled water,” she said. “The critical agricultural sector, a main source of food and income in Gaza, is at risk, including the current planting season.”



Read original article here

Turkey formally quits treaty to prevent violence against women

Thousands were set to protest across Turkey, where a court appeal to halt the withdrawal was rejected this week.

“We will continue our struggle,” Canan Gullu, president of the Federation of Turkish Women’s Associations, said on Wednesday. “Turkey is shooting itself in the foot with this decision.”

She said that since March, women and other vulnerable groups had been more reluctant to ask for help and less likely to receive it, with Covid-19 fueled economic difficulties causing a dramatic increase in violence against them.

The Istanbul Convention, negotiated in Turkey’s biggest city and signed in 2011, committed its signatories to prevent and prosecute domestic violence and promote equality.

Ankara’s withdrawal triggered condemnation from both the United States and the European Union, and critics say it puts Turkey even further out of step with the bloc that it applied to join in 1987.

Femicide has surged in Turkey, with one monitoring group logging roughly one per day in the last five years.

Proponents of the convention and related legislation say more stringent implementation is needed.

But many conservatives in Turkey and in Erdogan’s Islamist-rooted AK Party say the pact undermines the family structures that protect society.

Some also see the Convention as promoting homosexuality through its principle of non-discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation.

“Our country’s withdrawal from the convention will not lead to any legal or practical shortcoming in the prevention of violence against women,” Erdogan’s office said in a statement to the administrative court on Tuesday.

This month, Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights Dunja Mijatovic sent a letter to Turkey’s interior and justice ministers expressing concern about a rise in homophobic narratives by some officials, some of which targeted the convention.

“All the measures provided for by the Istanbul Convention reinforce family foundations and links by preventing and combating the main cause of destruction of families, that is, violence,” she said.

Amnesty International said the decision “set the clock back ten years on women’s rights and set a terrifying precedent.”

“The withdrawal sends a reckless and dangerous message to perpetrators who abuse, maim and kill: that they can carry on doing so with impunity,” said Amnesty International’s Secretary General Agnès Callamard.

Read original article here

Brisk walking for two-and-a-half hours a week could prevent early death caused by lack of sleep – study | World News

Going for a brisk walk for two-and-a-half hours a week could prevent an early death caused by a lack of sleep, new research suggests.

A study of 380,055 people over 11 years found that exercising in line with World Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines helped prevent strokes, heart disease and cancer.

The research suggested that two-and-a-half hours of walking or one hour and 15 minutes of running per week “eliminated most of the deleterious associations” of poor sleep and risk of an early death.

It indicated that people who did low levels of exercise and slept poorly were 57% more likely to die prematurely compared to those who exercise a lot and slept better as a result.

They also had a 67% higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease and a 45% bigger chance of being diagnosed with cancer.

Of the 380,055 people – with an average age of 65 – used in the study – 15,503 had died by the end.

Some 4,095 had died of cardiovascular diseases, 9,064 of cancer, 1,932 of coronary heart disease, 359 from a brain haemorrhage and 450 from a blood clot-related stroke.

The researchers, who work at University College London (UCL) and the University of Sydney commented: “Our results support the value of interventions to concurrently target (physical activity) and sleep to improve health.”

Read original article here

Florida Gov. DeSantis says he is trying to prevent ‘real catastrophic flood situation’ at Tampa-area reservoir

The governor assured the public that the water being discharged to nearby Port Manatee, on the Gulf Coast, is not radioactive.

The Manatee County Public Safety Department declared a state of emergency Saturday and ordered a complete evacuation of the Piney Point reservoir site, about 20 miles south of Tampa, and surrounding areas because of a leak that could cause a collapse of phosphogypsum stacks, radioactive waste that is created during fertilizer production and phosphate rock mining.

“What we’re looking at now is trying to prevent and respond to, if need be, a real catastrophic flood situation,” DeSantis said. “The goal is to ensure the integrity of the stack system as quickly as possible in order to minimize impacts to local residents and to prevent an uncontrolled discharge.”

Manatee County Commission Chair Vanessa Baugh assured Manatee County utility customers “their drinking water is completely safe to drink.”

“The water distribution system is a closed system without any way for floodwater to enter,” Baugh said. “There is also no threat to our primary source of drinking water, Lake Manatee.”

The leak in the containment wall was discovered about a week ago, and residents in the area were evacuated Thursday as officials warned the reservoir could cause structural collapse at any time.

DeSantis said Manatee County public safety officials sent out evacuation notices to residents and businesses in the surrounding area and assisted with the evacuation of 316 homes that were in the evacuation zone near Piney Point.

Onsite engineers said a controlled release was necessary to prevent a “catastrophic failure,” according to the governor. Controlled discharges that began March 30 and continued Sunday are averaging about 35 million gallons per day, he added.

The Florida National Guard is dropping off additional pumps, which “will be fed into surrounding waterways” to help quickly decrease the water levels in the reservoir, DeSantis said.

Acting county administrator Scott Hopes cautioned residents, asking them to “listen” to emergency management.

“If we should have a full breach, within minutes, we’re down to about 340 million gallons that could reach in totality, in a period of minutes, and the models for less than an hour, are as high of a 20 foot wall of water,” Hope said. “So if you are in an evacuation area, and you have not heeded that, you need to think twice and follow the orders.”

Hopes also said while they are not out of the critical area yet, they believe they will be in “a much better position, and the risk level will have decreased significantly,” by Tuesday.

CNN’s Chris Boyette and Melissa Alonso contributed to this report.

Read original article here

It’s possible to reach herd immunity, then lose it. Repeatedly. Here’s what you can do to help prevent that from happening

Herd immunity with Covid-19 could come and go, scientists say. Or we might never reach it at all.

“There’s a lot of things that have to go our way to actually get to herd immunity,” said Dr. Christopher Murray, director of the University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation.

But don’t panic. Here’s why it’s possible to dip in and out of herd immunity, and what you can do now to maximize the chances of snuffing out Covid-19 for good:

“Herd immunity is the point where there’s enough people that have been either infected or vaccinated that you basically can’t sustain transmission in the community,” Murray said.

“And if one case leads to less than one new infection, then eventually it peters out.”

Estimates vary on how much of the population needs to have immunity to reach that goal.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has said herd immunity might be reached if 70-85% of people are immune. Board-certified internist Dr. Jorge Rodriguez estimates that number is about 85-90%.

“If we vaccinate 70% of the whole US population, including kids, and then another 15-20% have already gotten (infected), I think we’re pretty close to reaching a normalcy with the virus,” he said.

But there’s a big catch: No one younger than 16 can get a coronavirus vaccine in the United States right now. The Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine is authorized for those age 16 and older, and the Moderna and Johnson & Johnson vaccines are authorized for adults ages 18 and older.

All three vaccine makers are conducting vaccine trials with children. Some health experts say high school and middle school-age children could be vaccinated by this fall, but Fauci has said younger children will likely have to wait until early 2022.

And that’s a major obstacle for reaching herd immunity, as young people can still get infected and transmit the virus.

“We have already 25% of our population not eligible for the vaccine. I mean, we’re already starting (with our) hands tied,” said epidemiologist Ali Mokdad, a professor of health metrics sciences at the IHME.

“So we want people who are eligible for the vaccine — all of them — to take it.”

Anti-vaxxers could prevent herd immunity

A big reason we might never reach herd immunity is because not enough people are willing to get vaccinated.

If that happens, the virus will have ample opportunity to spread, slowing down a return to normal life.

“It’s important to vaccinate as many adults as possible as soon as possible,” Rodriguez said. “If you want to open up America, get vaccinated.”

That includes young, healthy adults. Not only can they be easy transmitters of the virus; many are also suffering from long-term complications such as chronic fatigue, chest pain, shortness of breath and brain fog.

Still, about 20% of those surveyed said they definitely would not get vaccinated or would only get vaccinated if their job or school required it, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation COVID-19 Vaccine Monitor.
About 29% of Republicans said they definitely would not get a vaccine, and 28% of White Evangelical Christians said they definitely would not.

Rodriguez said he thinks vaccine hesitancy would be reduced if everyone saw how badly coronavirus can ravage victims.

“One of the reasons I think a lot of people don’t believe in the severity of this infection is that (it’s) unlike cancer. If you have a family member who has cancer, you see them go through the whole process. You see them go through the chemo, you see them go through the wilting away. … You see how horrible the death is,” he said.

“In Covid, when a family member is sick, they’re rushed to the hospital, and you don’t see them again. You don’t see them drown in their own phlegm. You don’t see them gasping for air.”

Herd immunity can change depending on the season

Murray said he believes the biggest reason we can “go in and out of herd immunity” is seasonality.

“We know now that Covid-19 is quite seasonal. There’s more transmission potential in the winter than in the summer,” he said.

“I think herd immunity can occur in the summer at pretty low levels — like 55%, 60%. And I think for the winter, it’s going to be closer to 80% immune.”

How could seasons impact how much a virus spreads?

“Part of it may be humidity. So there’s the idea that these respiratory viruses don’t like humidity, and because the air outside is cold (in the winter), it gets heated up inside the house, and therefore relative humidity is lower in the winter,” Murray said.

“It could be temperature itself — that the virus doesn’t like warm temperatures, it likes colder temperatures — in terms of how long in hangs around in the air or on surfaces.”

But differences in seasonal transmission could also be due to human behavior — like winter holiday celebrations and people gathering indoors because it’s cold outside.

“So there’s some physical factors, and then there’s definitely these behavioral factors,” Murray said.

How would we know whether we reach herd immunity?

“That’s going to be the tricky part,” Murray said. “What’s going to happen, very likely in the summer, is we will see very little transmission. And I think everyone’s going to say, ‘Time to celebrate! We’re done!’

“And then sometime late in the year will be that critical period where a lot of people may get caught by surprise that Covid’s back. And that’s the tricky thing. It’s not so much how do we know we’re at herd immunity — it’s how will we anticipate that we’re going to drop out of herd immunity.”

It’ll be easier to see when we drop out of herd immunity, Murray said, because Covid-19 numbers will start spiking again.

New (or future) variants could ruin herd immunity

Here’s the good news: All three vaccines currently used in the United States give strong protection against known variant strains of coronavirus.

But as the virus keeps spreading, replicating itself in new people, it has more opportunities to mutate. And if there are significant mutations, new and more dangerous variants could emerge.

“The more replication there is, the more mistakes are going to happen,” Rodriguez said.

“Think of a virus as a necklace full of different-colored beads. Maybe there are only eight colored beads to choose from. And in position No. 1, you need a red bead. Position No. 2 is a green bead. That’s the genetic code — that sequence of bead colors,” he said.

“When a virus replicates, it is supposed to make an exact replica of those bead colors. But every once in a while, maybe a green bead gets into where a red bead is supposed to be.”

The key is to quash the amount of virus circulating, so it has fewer chances to mutate and cause more infectious or deadlier variants.

That’s why getting vaccinated and continuing to wear masks are so important, Murray said.

Travel could make us fall out of herd immunity

Even if the US (or any other country) thinks it has reached herd immunity, global travel could introduce new variants and wreak havoc again.

That could be especially dangerous if a new variant compromises the effectiveness of vaccines or re-infects those who have been previously infected.

“Herd immunity will not happen until there is global immunity,” Rodriguez said.

“Just because we have herd immunity in the United States … as long as there is an influx of people from other countries and other areas, as long as there is an outflux of Americans going elsewhere, the chances of herd immunity not happening are great.”

And if a new variant spreads — either from international or domestic travel — it could infect even those who don’t travel.

“There might be one person in my hometown in Miami who didn’t get vaccinated. And he gets it. And it’s not a big deal (for him) because he’s 30 and he’s asymptomatic,” Rodriguez said.

“But in his body replicates (a variant). And that new virus is resistant to every vaccine. And then he spreads it to someone who’s vaccinated, but it doesn’t matter because this virus is resistant. And that person will get it. This is the absolute worst-case scenario.”

Immunity could wear off

Dwindling immunity — either from previous infection or from vaccination — could be another reason the US could slip in and out of herd immunity.

“We don’t know how long immunity from natural infection lasts,” Rodriguez said.

“I’ve had patients that have been infected, and we check their antibodies a month later, and they’re gone … I’ve had patients who got infected in the first surge, and they still have antibodies. But it’s very unpredictable,” he said.

“We also don’t know yet how long we’re going to have immunity from being vaccinated. We don’t know if it’s a year. We don’t know if it’s 9 months. We don’t know if it’s 2 years yet. Obviously, the people that were in the (vaccine trial) studies that started in October or so, they’re being followed on a regular basis” to help determine how long vaccine immunity lasts.

Murray said he suspects immunity from vaccination will be better than immunity from getting infected.

“The question is how good,” he said. “If natural immunity (from infection) is waning, let’s say, 20-30% over a course of a year or more, will a vaccine be only 10% (less effective)? These are things we just don’t know.”

With two potential problems on the horizon — waning immunity and the possibility of new, more dangerous variants — Murray said many scientists believe “people are going to end up getting vaccinated on some regular basis.”

This would be similar to how people get a new flu shot every year.

Covid-19 “may be around forever, but it may just not be as severe as it has been this time around,” he said. “That’s certainly the hope.”

How to maximize our chances of crushing Covid-19

The most important step is to get vaccinated, Rodriguez said.

“By maximizing vaccinations, we can minimize infectivity and mutations,” he said.

“The more we vaccinate, the less likely we are (going to slip in and out of herd immunity) because there’s going to be less replication.”

Less replication means less opportunity for the virus to mutate and become potentially dangerous variants.

“The virus only replicates when it infects someone. The virus does not have the material to make new viruses on its own,” Rodriguez said. “So floating around, a virus isn’t going to mutate.”

After getting vaccinated, it’s important to “still follow the recommendations by the CDC, because they will know what is happening in this country as far as variants,” he said.

“They know now, which is why they’re saying, ‘Please continue wearing masks.'”

The best-case scenario and a more likely scenario

The best possible outcome is that coronavirus “burns itself out because there are so many people vaccinated, it has nowhere to go,” Rodriguez said. “That’s completely possible.”

But more realistically — because of vaccine hesitancy and other factors — Covid-19 will be with us for much longer, possibly in waves, Murray said.

He said people can help prevent another seasonal surge next winter by wearing masks.

By masking up, “you really have a huge effect because if there is going to be transmission, it’s going to be much less than what we’ve seen because so many people will be vaccinated,” he said.

“So it only takes a little bit more effort to sort of stop transmission in its tracks.”

Murray said simple steps now can reduce the chances of losing herd immunity in the future.

“Anything that cuts transmission will help reduce the emergence of new variants. So definitely vaccination, and definitely mask-wearing,” he said.

“I really think it depends a lot on how well we do at convincing people to get vaccinated and how well we do at getting vaccines out to kids once they’re approved.”

The fate of Covid-19 may range from coming back every year to being completely snuffed out. And the route it takes is largely in our power right now, Rodriguez said.

“Every day, every second, how long this is going to last is absolutely in all of our controls — whether we’re young or old or healthy or feeble.”

CNN’s Paul LeBlanc contributed to this report.

Read original article here

Vaccines could prevent asymptomatic infection. Here’s why that’s key to ending the pandemic.

Vaccine distribution is ramping up in many countries, but with Covid-19 cases also climbing once again and the prospect of another surge of infections on the horizon, the world is in a race against time.

Key to winning the race, experts say, is not only whether the vaccines will play a significant role in preventing serious illness from Covid-19, but also whether they can block people from spreading the virus.

“The ideal vaccine would have two performance features: One prevents you from going to the hospital, going to the ICU and losing your life,” said Dr. Peter Hotez, co-director of the Center for Vaccine Development at Texas Children’s Hospital and dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine. “But if the vaccine also halts asymptomatic spread, then you could potentially vaccinate your way out of the epidemic.”

Full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak

Early indications have been promising so far. The effect of vaccines on asymptomatic infection had been a big unknown, but scientists say it will be crucial to ending the pandemic.

It’s estimated that asymptomatic cases, which involve people who are infected with Covid-19 but have no symptoms, account for more than half of all transmissions of the virus, according to a recent study published in the journal JAMA Network Open by researchers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. If vaccines can block asymptomatic infections, they could also significantly reduce overall transmission, offering hope that the virus may soon be contained.

Vaccines can protect against transmission by reducing a person’s viral load, or how much virus is present in the body, said Dr. Becky Smith, an associate professor of medicine at Duke University.

“Theoretically, by reducing your viral load, it should prevent your ability to transmit to others,” she said. “And even if it doesn’t fully prevent transmission, it should lower it significantly.”

The focus on vaccines and transmission comes at an important juncture in the pandemic. Although cases globally fell for several weeks, some European countries are now seeing rebounds. Parts of the U.S. are also reporting upticks, a worrisome development given that many states recently relaxed public health restrictions.

Concerns about coronavirus variants, including strains that may be more contagious, also persist. The government’s top infectious disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told NBC News’ Richard Engel on Thursday that the U.S. needs to vaccinate as many people as possible to avoid further outbreaks.

Part of that strategy hinges on the effect vaccine could have on reducing transmission.

Last week, new data from Israel, where nearly 60 percent of the country’s 9 million residents have received at least one dose of a vaccine, suggested that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is 94 percent effective at preventing asymptomatic infections.

A separate study conducted by researchers at Cambridge University, in the United Kingdom, found that a single dose of the Pfizer vaccine can reduce asymptomatic infections by 75 percent. The results, which have yet to be peer-reviewed, came from an analysis of around 4,400 tests conducted on vaccinated health care workers in Cambridge over a two-week period in January.

In Johnson & Johnson’s trials, the company’s vaccine was found to be 74 percent effective against asymptomatic infections. And according to a report released in December by the Food and Drug Administration, early data suggested that Moderna’s vaccine may also protect against asymptomatic infections, but the company has said more research is needed.

Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the Georgetown University Center for Global Health Science and Security, said the early findings are “very promising.” But she added that there are still some big unanswered questions.

“From the real-world data that we have so far, it does look like the vaccines have an impact on asymptomatic infection,” she said. “The real question, though, is how broad will this be?”

And because vaccines aren’t 100 percent effective, it’s possible that a small number of vaccinated people could become infected with the virus. If that does happen and a vaccinated individual is asymptomatic, it’s not yet known whether the person could spread Covid-19 to others, Rasmussen said.

In a new commentary published Thursday in the journal Science, Rasmussen and Saskia Popescu, an infectious disease epidemiologist at George Mason University in Virginia, detail why controlling “symptomless transmission” is critical to ending the pandemic. Symptomless transmission includes both people who have no symptoms and those who are pre-symptomatic but later go on to develop symptoms.

“As more people get vaccinated, that will have a population-wide effect on transmission, but while the majority of people right now are not vaccinated, we need to be mindful of the issue of asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic transmission,” Rasmussen said.

Most scientists agree that there are two main paths out of the pandemic. One involves reaching a threshold known as herd immunity — when enough people have developed antibodies from natural infection or from vaccines that future outbreaks are unlikely. The other requires clamping down on the spread of the virus so much that even unvaccinated parts of the population face little risk of becoming infected.

If vaccines can protect against asymptomatic infection, they could help with the latter, but the two strategies shouldn’t be mutually exclusive, Rasmussen said.

Download the NBC News app for full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak

“It’s really a suite of interventions,” she said. “We need to be thinking of ways to get transmission down overall, and we need to not be relying exclusively on the vaccines.”

One way to drive down overall transmission is to heed public health measures that have been in place throughout the pandemic, such as practicing social distancing, wearing masks and avoiding gatherings with unvaccinated people. If the virus can be adequately contained, aspects of life could return more to normal even if parts of a population are still unvaccinated, Rasmussen said.

“We don’t need to be at the herd immunity threshold to relax restrictions,” she said. “If we can get the virus to be so uncommon in the population, there won’t be a risk of people being exposed to it, whether they’re vaccinated or not.”

Read original article here

Guam needs more defenses to prevent Chinese ‘cheap shot,’ admiral says

  • The Indo-Pacific Command chief pushed lawmakers to boost Guam’s defenses against threats from China.
  • He said that Aegis Ashore would better protect the strategic territory from missiles.
  • “Guam is a target today,” he stated, noting that Guam will face greater threats in the future.
  • Visit the Business section of Insider for more stories.

The top US commander in the Indo-Pacific pressed lawmakers on Tuesday to support the fielding of additional air-and-missile defense capabilities for Guam given China’s growing ability to threaten the important territory.

“Guam is a target today,” US Navy Adm. Philip Davidson, the commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, told the Senate Armed Services Committee. “It needs to be defended, and it needs to be prepared for the threats that will come in the future.”

“Guam is not just a place that we believe that we can fight from, as we have for many decades,” he said, telling the Senate panel that “we are going to have to fight for it.”

The admiral, who has made the defense of Guam a top priority, said that this strategic US territory would benefit from Aegis Ashore. He argued that the Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense system in place to defend Guam is incapable “of meeting the current trajectory of threats from China.”

Davidson called attention to a Chinese propaganda video that showed an H-6 bomber strike on Andersen Air Force Base on Guam as evidence of China’s strategic thinking. The video was mocked for shamelessly ripping footage from Hollywood films like ‘Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen.”

The Pentagon’s most recent China military power report noted that Chinese “H-6K bomber flights into the western Pacific Ocean demonstrate China’s ability to range Guam with air-launched [land-attack cruise missiles]” while the DF-26 mid-range missile nicknamed the “Guam Express” is “capable of conducting precision conventional or nuclear strikes against ground targets, which could include US bases on Guam.”

Davidson said that Guam would be better to prepared to defend against these threats with Aegis Ashore, an air-and-missile defense system based on the system the US Navy has installed on a number of its guided-missile destroyers and cruisers.

Davidson said Tuesday that America has “to demonstrate that any ambition China might have and any threat it might put forth toward Guam would come at cost.”

“That would be really by the collection of not only this defensive capability, which I think is so critical because it prevents a cheap shot,” but also other capabilities “to let China know that the cost of what they seek to do are too high and give them doubt in their success,” he said.

The admiral told lawmakers that putting Aegis Ashore on Guam would show China that “it “can’t knock Guam out with an easy shot and keep us out of the fight to present a fait accompli” in a regional crisis, such as a conflict over Taiwan.

Davidson’s Aegis Ashore proposal is part of the broader Pacific Defense Initiative expected to require an estimated $4.6 billion in defense funds in fiscal year 2022 and $27 billion over the next five years as the Pentagon makes competition with China a priority.

Department of Defense leadership has repeatedly identified China as the “pacing threat,” and the Biden administration has singled China out as America’s most challenging competitor.

In this competition, Guam is a vital territorial holding. Not only is it home to more than 170,000 US citizens and service members, but it also offers access to a deepwater port, fuel and munition storage, and an airfield that for US power projection. A submarine squadron and a ship that performs maintenance on them are based there.

“America’s day begins in Guam, and it is not only a location we must fight-from, but one we must also fight-for given the threats we face in the near term and the foreseeable future,” Davidson told lawmakers Tuesday.

Read original article here

US coronavirus: Covid-19 vaccines may prevent infection and not just symptoms, study suggests

A team at the Mayo Clinic health system looked at more than 31,000 people across four states who had received at least one dose of either vaccine — and found their vaccines were upwards of 80% effective in preventing infection 36 days after the first dose.

Vaccine efficacy was 75% 15 days after the first dose, and appeared 89% effective from 36 days after the second dose, according to the research, which has not yet been peer-reviewed.

More than 59 million vaccine doses have so far been administered in the US, according to data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

But Dr. Christopher Murray, director of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington, said Friday that the US is unlikely to achieve herd immunity for the virus before the winter.

“We know Covid is really seasonal, so when the next winter rolls around, we need to have a much higher level of protection to stop Covid in its tracks than we are likely to achieve,” he said.

Herd immunity doesn’t take effect until 80% or more of the population has immunity, either through infection or vaccination. And the new variants may complicate the picture, Murray said. If people can be reinfected with the new variants, the pandemic may take off again.

Though officials hope to have vaccines widely distributed by the end of the summer, President Biden said Friday that issues like weather, mutating strains and manufacturing delays make it hard to nail down a timeline.

“I believe we’re on the road, I promise you. I know we’ll run into bumps. It’s not going to be easy here to the end, but we’re going to beat this. We’re going to beat this,” he said while visiting a Pfizer facility in Michigan.

Too risky to give single doses, Fauci says

One way to protect more people quickly, some experts suggest, is to prioritize administering first doses of the vaccine.

Dr. Ashish Jha, Dean of the Brown University School of Public Health, advocated Friday for US officials to consider delaying the second dose.

“Would that really be a problem, because if we could do that, we could vaccinate a lot more high-risk people, quickly…Everybody needs a second dose, but I think we can do it in a way that’s still safe and get a lot more people protected,” Jha told CNN’s Poppy Harlow.

But Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said Friday that a single-dose plan would be too risky.

Fauci said he worried that if large numbers of people got a single shot and had less than optimal immune responses, they could be exposed to the virus and start incubating viral mutations. In theory, new variants could arise, he said.

“We will stick with the scientifically documented efficacy and optimal response of a prime followed by a boost with the mRNA vaccines,” Fauci told a White House briefing.

Jha, for his part, said he agreed that everybody needed a second dose, “I think the question is, right now we wait four weeks between first and second dose. What if we went six weeks or eight weeks or 10 weeks — not much longer than that.”

School can reopen no matter the virus’ spread, CDC director says

In the hopes of returning to some sense of normalcy, a priority to many families and officials has been allowing students to resume in-person learning.

And CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said Friday that given the right precautions, schools may open no matter how much virus is spreading in the community.

As of Tuesday, CNN analysis indicated about 90% of children live in so-called red zones under the CDC’s guidance — meaning there is a high level of community spread of the virus. But even in those conditions, schools can safely reopen if they take precautions, Walensky told a White House briefing.

The CDC has said schools can reopen if they make sure they are mitigating the risk of spread with universal mask use, measures to keep children and staff six feet apart, frequent cleaning and disinfection and testing and contact tracing.

The CDC director’s assurances came as Fauci announced that the US should have vaccine safety data for high school-age kids by the beginning of the Fall.

Companies are just starting tests of younger age groups but have been testing their vaccines on 12- to 17-year-olds, Fauci told a White House briefing. Safety data for younger children will likely not be available until early next year, he said.

Vaccine hesitancy not an excuse for inequities

Meanwhile, vaccine trials and distribution have shed light on inequities in the medical field.

People of color have been vastly underrepresented in US-based vaccine trials for the last decade, according to a new study released Friday by researchers at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Harvard, Emory and other institutions.

The study found that White people made up the majority, or 78%, of participants in trials conducted between June 2011 and June 2020.

The study, published in the JAMA Network Open, comes as the nation grapples with a pandemic that has disproportionately impacted people of color. Health care leaders are working to combat vaccine distrust among Black and brown people, saying the shot is the key to preventing further devastating in their communities.

But that hesitancy should not be an excuse for officials to explain away racial disparities in vaccination, Fauci said.

“It’s that we’ve got to really extend ourselves into the community to get the access to minority populations that they don’t have,” Fauci said in an interview with MSNBC.

CNN’s Christopher Rios, Amanda Sealy, Lauren Mascarenhas, Kevin Liptak, Maggie Fox, Nicholas Neville and Nicquel Terry Ellis contributed to this report.

Read original article here

Blood Thinners May Be Able to Prevent Severe COVID, Study Says

One of the biggest challenges plaguing doctors since the start of the coronavirus pandemic has has been figuring out how to treat the novel virus. Fortunately, as time has gone on, new studies have found certain existing medications that could reduce symptoms, severe cases, and even death. Now, another common medication has been found to be effective at keeping the disease from progressing or turning fatal. According to a Feb. 2021 study published in The BMJ, patients who are given blood thinners within a day of being admitted to a hospital with COVID have a greater chance of survival than those who are not. Read on to discover what the new research says, and if you’re worried about you risk factors, know that Lacking This Vitamin Could Put You at Risk of Severe COVID, New Study Says.

The researchers looked at data from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs on 4,297 COVID patients with a mean age of 68 years. They found that those who were provided with blood thinners within 24 hours of being admitted to the hospital with COVID had their relative risk of dying from the disease reduced by 34 percent as compared to individuals who were not provided anticoagulants.

Blood clots are a common—and frequently fatal—occurrence in COVID patients; according to a review of research published in the Jan. 2021 volume of the journal Medical Hypotheses, approximately one-third of severe COVID patients present with blood clotting or elevated levels of D-dimer, a protein found in the bloodstream after a clot has come apart.

While more research is needed, the study’s authors say their findings “provide strong real world evidence to support guidelines recommending the use of prophylactic anticoagulation as initial treatment for patients with COVID-19 on hospital admission.”

Read on to discover which other medications and supplements could be key to surviving the virus, and if you want to protect yourself every day, know that If You See This on Your Mask, the FDA Says Toss It Immediately.

iStock

In February, researchers at the University of Oxford discovered that tocilizumab, an anti-inflammatory medication frequently prescribed to individuals with rheumatoid arthritis, could reduce COVID mortality rates. In reviewing research from the Randomized Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy (RECOVERY) trial, researchers found that COVID patients given tocilizumab had a death rate of 29 percent in the first 28 days of treatment versus a death rate of 33 percent among patients who weren’t prescribed the drug. And for more ways to stay safe, beware that If You’ve Done This, You’re Twice as Likely to Develop Severe COVID.

iStock

Flushing out your nose with a particular kind of nasal spray might make you less susceptible to COVID, according to a new study. According to a preprint of an in vitro study published through bioRxiv, Xclear Sinus Care nasal spray significantly reduced the amount of virus in a test sample. Researchers posited that this was due to the combination of grapefruit seed extract (GSE) and xylitol, a non-caloric sweetener, used in the spray’s formula.

“GSE significantly reduces the viral load while xylitol prevents the virus attachment to the core protein on the cell wall,” explained the study’s authors. And if you’re eager to protect yourself against COVID, check out If You Live in These States, You Can Now Get Vaccinated at Walgreens.

Shutterstock

Omega-3 fatty acids have emerged as a surprising means of reducing severe COVID symptoms, according to a new study. According to Jan. 2021 research published in the journal Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids, individuals with the highest levels of omega-3 fatty acids in their blood had a 75 percent lower risk of COVID death compared to those with lower circulating omega-3 levels. This “strongly suggests that these nutritionally available marine fatty acids may help reduce risk for adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients,” explained Arash Asher, MD, the study’s lead author. And for the latest COVID news delivered straight to your inbox, sign up for our daily newsletter.

iStock/Jelena Danilovic

Melatonin, a popular sleep aid, may help individuals avoid contracting COVID, recent research claims. A Nov. 2020 study led by researchers at the Cleveland Clinic found that study subjects who used melatonin were 30 percent less likely to develop COVID than those who didn’t use the supplement.

However, that doesn’t mean you should go out and grab a bottle for yourself. “It is very important to note these findings do not suggest people should start to take melatonin without consulting their physician,” said the study’s lead author Feixiong Cheng, PhD, assistant staff in Cleveland Clinic’s Genomic Medicine Institute. And for a jarring prediction about what’s to come with the pandemic, check out The U.K.’s Top Scientist Has a Chilling COVID Warning for Americans.

Read original article here