Tag Archives: predictions

UFC 259 predictions — Israel Adesanya vs. Jan Blachowicz: Fight card, odds, expert picks, prelims

When it comes to fight cards, they don’t get much bigger — or better — than what we have on tap for UFC 259. With three championship fights and a host of current and former champions and title challengers up and down the card, it’s easy to see why the MMA world is eagerly anticipating the action from inside Las Vegas’ UFC Apex on Saturday night.

In the main event, middleweight champion Israel Adesanya heads to the light heavyweight division to challenge 205-pound champion Jan Blachowicz in the Pol’s first title defense. The co-main event features two-division champ Amanda Nunes defending her women’s featherweight title against Megan Anderson. Bantamweight champion Petr Yan will also defend his 135-pound title on the card, taking on top contender Aljamain Sterling.

This card is about as big as it gets, too. Despite the innumerable issues that have plagued UFC matchmaking during the pandemic, this card has managed to stay together with 15 fights on tap with everything from fighters making their UFC debuts to former champions and title challengers looking to make their way back to the top. 

Can’t get enough boxing and MMA? Get the latest in the world of combat sports from two of the best in the business. Subscribe to Morning Kombat with Luke Thomas and Brian Campbell for the best analysis and in-depth news, including a complete preview of UFC 259 below.

With so much happening on Saturday night, let’s take a closer look at the full fight card with the latest odds from William Hill Sportsbook before we get to our staff predictions and picks for the PPV portion of the festivities.

UFC 259 fight card, odds

  • Israel Adesanya -230 vs. Jan Blachowicz (c) +190, light heavyweight championship
  • Amanda Nunes (c) -1100 vs. Megan Anderson +700, women’s featherweight championship
  • Petr Yan (c) -120 vs. Aljamain Sterling +100, bantamweight championship
  • Islam Makhachev -410 vs. Drew Dober +320, lightweights
  • Aleksandar Rakic -160 vs. Thiago Santos +135, light heavyweights
  • Casey Kenney -135 vs. Dominick Cruz +115, bantamweights
  • Song Yadong -150 vs. Kyler Phillips +125, bantamweights
  • Askar Askarov -125 vs. Joseph Benavidez +105, flyweights
  • Amanda Lemos -220 vs. Livinha Souza +180, women’s strawweights
  • Jordan Espinosa -125 vs. Tim Elliott +105, flyweights
  • Carlos Ulberg -240 vs. Kennedy Nzechukwu +200, light heavyweights
  • Sean Brady -210 vs. Jake Matthews +175, welterweights
  • Kai Kara-France -135 vs. Rogerio Bontorin +115, flyweights
  • Uros Medic -170 vs. Aalon Cruz +145, lightweights
  • Mario Bautista -230 vs. Trevin Jones +190, bantamweights

With such a massive main event on tap, the crew at CBS Sports went ahead with predictions and picks for the main card. Here are your pick makers: Brent Brookhouse (Combat sports writer), Brian Campbell (Combat sports writer, co-host of “Morning Kombat”), Matthew Coca (producer), Jack Crosby (editor), Michael Mormile (producer) and Brandon Wise (senior editor).

UFC 259 picks, predictions

Blachowicz (c) vs. Adesanya Adesanya Adesanya Adesanya Blachowicz Adesanya Adesanya
Nunes (c) vs. Anderson Nunes Nunes Nunes Nunes Nunes Nunes
Yan (c) vs. Sterling Yan Sterling Sterling Sterling Sterling Yan
Makhachev vs. Dober Makhachev Makhachev Makhachev Makhachev Dober Makhachev
Rakic vs. Santos Santos Santos Rakic Rakic Santos Rakic
Records to date (2021) 6-3 6-3 6-3 5-4 5-4 2-7

Campbell on why Adesanya will win: This has all the makings to be a one-sided demolition, even with the legitimate threat that the 38-year-old Blachowicz brings in the form of top-shelf power. Expect Adesanya’s speed and accuracy to be a problem for as long as this fight lasts. “The Last Stylebender” is both taller and longer despite being the fighter who is moving up in weight and as long as he avoids the clinch while grappling with his back against the cage, this has all the makings to be a spectacular statement to the light heavyweight division.

Brookhouse on why Adesanya will win: Blachowicz’s path to victory involves somehow either landing a one-shot knockout blow or using his strength advantage to completely nullify Adesanya’s striking. There’s a huge gulf in striking technique between the two men, so Blachowicz has to figure out how he is going to get around that. Put simply: I don’t think he can. Adesanya is a next-level talent on the feet. As long as he doesn’t completely go into his shell and lack aggression like in his fight with Yoel Romero — a career worst performance for Adesanya — Saturday night should see the crowning of a two-division king.

Campbell on why Nunes will win: Anderson is anything but a blown-up bantamweight, which makes this a potentially interesting matchup should the 6-foot tall featherweight contender prove able to establish her jab from distance and set up her powerful right hand. The problem, of course, is that Nunes is the G.O.A.T. for a reason and has methodically eliminated any form of flaws to her game. Nunes’ advantage on the ground should prove to be the difference maker here if Anderson proves able to strike on somewhat even terms. “The Lioness” may have to work a bit harder than the betting odds suggest, but a finish for the champion still feels inevitable.

Campbell on why Yan will win: This is as great a fight on paper as UFC could make in any weight division. In the end, despite the near pick ’em odds, something has to give in this matchup and Yan’s devastating standup game could prove to be the difference the later this fight goes. As strong as Sterling is on the ground, making Yan’s takedown defense a crucial part of his chances of victory, Aljo simply can’t trade with the champion on even terms for too long. There’s no shortage of potential for this to be a five-round thriller and one that Yan can win. 

Brookhouse on why Sterling will win: Yan has the advantage on the feet if there are lengthy stretches where the men get into extended boxing spurts. But Sterling is good enough on the feet that he shouldn’t be completely overwhelmed. The difference here is Sterling’s ground game. Yan can talk all he wants about the talented grapplers he trains with. You know who else trains with talented grapplers in addition to being a high-level grappler himself? Cory Sandhagen. It took Sterling less than 90 seconds to put Sandhagen on the ground, advance position and sink in a fight-winning choke. Yan has yet to face someone like Sterling in the UFC, with his grappling approach and who was also peaking as a fighter. Yan is talented and this is a pick ’em fight for a reason, but Sterling is going to bring dimensions that Yan has yet to prove he can handle.

Wise on why Rakic will win: Despite the recent trend of older fighters staying relevant and fighting their way to the top of the sport in some cases, this is a tough sell for Thiago Santos. Rakic is a younger version of what Santos brought to the table and comes without the damage the Brazilian has endured. Santos looked off in his first fight back from double knee surgery against Glover Teixeira and it feels like a situation where the miles are starting to add up on the 37-year old. Expect both men to blitz for the quick knockout, but Rakic is too quick and elusive to get caught with one of those bombs.

Who will win Blachowicz vs. Adesanya, and which underdog is a must-back? Visit SportsLine now to get detailed picks on every fight at UFC 259, all from the incomparable expert who’s up more than $21,000 on MMA in the past 25 months, and find out.

require.config({"baseUrl":"https://sportsfly.cbsistatic.com/fly-173/bundles/sportsmediajs/js-build","config":{"version":{"fly/components/accordion":"1.0","fly/components/alert":"1.0","fly/components/base":"1.0","fly/components/carousel":"1.0","fly/components/dropdown":"1.0","fly/components/fixate":"1.0","fly/components/form-validate":"1.0","fly/components/image-gallery":"1.0","fly/components/iframe-messenger":"1.0","fly/components/load-more":"1.0","fly/components/load-more-article":"1.0","fly/components/load-more-scroll":"1.0","fly/components/loading":"1.0","fly/components/modal":"1.0","fly/components/modal-iframe":"1.0","fly/components/network-bar":"1.0","fly/components/poll":"1.0","fly/components/search-player":"1.0","fly/components/social-button":"1.0","fly/components/social-counts":"1.0","fly/components/social-links":"1.0","fly/components/tabs":"1.0","fly/components/video":"1.0","fly/libs/easy-xdm":"2.4.17.1","fly/libs/jquery.cookie":"1.2","fly/libs/jquery.throttle-debounce":"1.1","fly/libs/jquery.widget":"1.9.2","fly/libs/omniture.s-code":"1.0","fly/utils/jquery-mobile-init":"1.0","fly/libs/jquery.mobile":"1.3.2","fly/libs/backbone":"1.0.0","fly/libs/underscore":"1.5.1","fly/libs/jquery.easing":"1.3","fly/managers/ad":"2.0","fly/managers/components":"1.0","fly/managers/cookie":"1.0","fly/managers/debug":"1.0","fly/managers/geo":"1.0","fly/managers/gpt":"4.3","fly/managers/history":"2.0","fly/managers/madison":"1.0","fly/managers/social-authentication":"1.0","fly/utils/data-prefix":"1.0","fly/utils/data-selector":"1.0","fly/utils/function-natives":"1.0","fly/utils/guid":"1.0","fly/utils/log":"1.0","fly/utils/object-helper":"1.0","fly/utils/string-helper":"1.0","fly/utils/string-vars":"1.0","fly/utils/url-helper":"1.0","libs/jshashtable":"2.1","libs/select2":"3.5.1","libs/jsonp":"2.4.0","libs/jquery/mobile":"1.4.5","libs/modernizr.custom":"2.6.2","libs/velocity":"1.2.2","libs/dataTables":"1.10.6","libs/dataTables.fixedColumns":"3.0.4","libs/dataTables.fixedHeader":"2.1.2","libs/dateformat":"1.0.3","libs/waypoints/infinite":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/inview":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/jquery.waypoints":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/sticky":"3.1.1","libs/jquery/dotdotdot":"1.6.1","libs/jquery/flexslider":"2.1","libs/jquery/lazyload":"1.9.3","libs/jquery/maskedinput":"1.3.1","libs/jquery/marquee":"1.3.1","libs/jquery/numberformatter":"1.2.3","libs/jquery/placeholder":"0.2.4","libs/jquery/scrollbar":"0.1.6","libs/jquery/tablesorter":"2.0.5","libs/jquery/touchswipe":"1.6.18","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.core":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.draggable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.mouse":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.position":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.slider":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.sortable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.touch-punch":"0.2.3","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.autocomplete":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.accordion":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tabs":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.menu":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.dialog":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.resizable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.button":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tooltip":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.effects":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.datepicker":"1.11.4"}},"shim":{"liveconnection/managers/connection":{"deps":["liveconnection/libs/sockjs-0.3.4"]},"liveconnection/libs/sockjs-0.3.4":{"exports":"SockJS"},"libs/setValueFromArray":{"exports":"set"},"libs/getValueFromArray":{"exports":"get"},"fly/libs/jquery.mobile-1.3.2":["version!fly/utils/jquery-mobile-init"],"libs/backbone.marionette":{"deps":["jquery","version!fly/libs/underscore","version!fly/libs/backbone"],"exports":"Marionette"},"fly/libs/underscore-1.5.1":{"exports":"_"},"fly/libs/backbone-1.0.0":{"deps":["version!fly/libs/underscore","jquery"],"exports":"Backbone"},"libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tabs-1.11.4":["jquery","version!libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.core","version!fly/libs/jquery.widget"],"libs/jquery/flexslider-2.1":["jquery"],"libs/dataTables.fixedColumns-3.0.4":["jquery","version!libs/dataTables"],"libs/dataTables.fixedHeader-2.1.2":["jquery","version!libs/dataTables"],"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/app/VideoPlayer/AdobePass-min.js":["https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/util/Utils-min.js"]},"map":{"*":{"adobe-pass":"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/app/VideoPlayer/AdobePass-min.js","facebook":"https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js","facebook-debug":"https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all/debug.js","google":"https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js","google-platform":"https://apis.google.com/js/client:platform.js","google-csa":"https://www.google.com/adsense/search/async-ads.js","google-javascript-api":"https://www.google.com/jsapi","google-client-api":"https://apis.google.com/js/api:client.js","gpt":"https://securepubads.g.doubleclick.net/tag/js/gpt.js","newsroom":"https://c2.taboola.com/nr/cbsinteractive-cbssports/newsroom.js","recaptcha":"https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?onload=loadRecaptcha&render=explicit","recaptcha_ajax":"https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api/js/recaptcha_ajax.js","supreme-golf":"https://sgapps-staging.supremegolf.com/search/assets/js/bundle.js","taboola":"https://cdn.taboola.com/libtrc/cbsinteractive-cbssports/loader.js","twitter":"https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js","video-utils":"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/util/Utils-min.js"}},"waitSeconds":300});



Read original article here

2021 Golden Globes Predictions: Will ‘Borat’ Be the Big Winner?

When it comes to predicting winners at the Golden Globes on Sunday night, you have to imagine an array of conflicting agendas. The Hollywood Foreign Press Association, which puts on the ceremony, likes to bestow its trophies on films that already have plenty of Oscar momentum, but the small size of the group — around 90 eccentric journalists who vote for the Globes — leaves every category open to a shock winner.

This year, the pandemic deprived association members of the chance to rub shoulders with big celebrities, a glamorous perk that can often influence their selections. The H.F.P.A. is also under fire after a raft of recent articles exposed double-dealing practices and an insular membership that includes no Black voters, which may explain why none of the past year’s acclaimed Black-led ensembles like “Da 5 Bloods” and “One Night in Miami” made the Globes’ best-drama lineup.

Will voters try to mitigate those controversies by picking a diverse set of worthy winners, or will traditional Globe anarchy prevail? I expect a bit of both. Here are my projections for this year’s film races at the Golden Globes.

Viola Davis, “Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom”
Andra Day, “United States vs. Billie Holiday”
Vanessa Kirby, “Pieces of a Woman”
Frances McDormand, “Nomadland”
Carey Mulligan, “Promising Young Woman”

This race may come down to McDormand and Mulligan, each fronting zeitgeisty films that were also nominated in the drama, director, and screenplay categories. Since Mulligan’s role as the avenging, utterly contemporary Cassie is a major change of pace for a star often seen in period pieces, I project her to win in a squeaker.

Riz Ahmed, “Sound of Metal”
Chadwick Boseman, “Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom”
Anthony Hopkins, “The Father”
Gary Oldman, “Mank”
Tahar Rahim, “The Mauritanian”

Boseman’s status as the Oscar favorite is so presumed that if the Globes went a different way, they’d invite further scrutiny and controversy at a time when they hardly need more it. That isn’t to say the category lacks powerhouse alternatives: In any other year, Hopkins, Ahmed or Oldman might easily cruise to victory here. But not this time.

“The Father”
“Mank”
“Nomadland”
“Promising Young Woman”
“The Trial of the Chicago 7”

For all their strengths, “The Father” and “Mank” feel less urgent when pitted against three Big Issue dramas. “Promising Young Woman” would be the provocative, spiky pick, but Globe voters tend to gravitate toward a film with a serious chance at winning the best picture Oscar, and by that metric, “Nomadland” and “The Trial of the Chicago 7” have the highest hopes. This could go either way, but I’m projecting “Chicago 7,” written and directed by two-time Globe winner Aaron Sorkin.

Maria Bakalova, “Borat Subsequent Moviefilm”
Kate Hudson, “Music”
Michelle Pfeiffer, “French Exit”
Rosamund Pike, “I Care a Lot”
Anya Taylor-Joy, “Emma”

Bakalova delivered one of the year’s breakthrough performances as Borat’s daughter, and though she’ll be campaigned as a supporting actress for the Academy Awards, the Globes’ comedy/musical categories offer her a prime opportunity to dart into the lead race and snatch a high-profile trophy. Over a handful of contenders with long shot Oscar hopes, she’s good as gold.

Sacha Baron Cohen, “Borat Subsequent Moviefilm”
James Corden, “The Prom”
Lin-Manuel Miranda, “Hamilton”
Dev Patel, “The Personal History of David Copperfield
Andy Samberg, “Palm Springs”

Baron Cohen won this Golden Globe for the first “Borat,” and his only real competition here is the well-liked Miranda. Still, “Hamilton” peaked five years ago, and the H.F.P.A. doesn’t like to feel like the last to arrive at a party. Expect more votes for Baron Cohen, whose acceptance speech could spice up a socially distanced night.

“Borat Subsequent Moviefilm”
“Hamilton”
“Music”
“Palm Springs”
“The Prom”

“Palm Springs” and “The Prom” aren’t significant Globe threats, and the nominations for “Music” drew such ridicule that voters will probably shy away from further recognition for the Sia-directed fiasco. That leaves just “Hamilton” and “Borat,” and since the Disney+ taping of “Hamilton” won’t be Oscar-eligible, the H.F.P.A. should favor Baron Cohen’s suited prankster.

Glenn Close, “Hillbilly Elegy”
Olivia Colman, “The Father”
Jodie Foster, “The Mauritanian”
Amanda Seyfried, “Mank”
Helena Zengel, “News of the World”

Just two years ago, Close won best actress in a drama for “The Wife,” while Colman took best actress in a musical or comedy for “The Favourite.” What happens when you put those two Globe winners head-to-head in this year’s supporting-actress race? Potentially, it creates enough daylight for Seyfried to slip through, but I think Colman still has the upper hand against Close for a better-reviewed film that scored Globe nominations across the board.

Sacha Baron Cohen, “The Trial of the Chicago 7”
Daniel Kaluuya, “Judas and the Black Messiah”
Jared Leto, “The Little Things”
Bill Murray, “On the Rocks”
Leslie Odom Jr., “One Night in Miami”

With Odom sitting pretty in the best-song category and Baron Cohen likelier to win for “Borat,” will voters spread the wealth here and pick someone else? Kaluuya’s magnetic performance as the Black Panther leader Fred Hampton has a lot of Oscar heat, but the Globes have gone wacky in this category before — or don’t you remember when the “Nocturnal Animals” star Aaron Taylor-Johnson beat out Mahershala Ali of “Moonlight”? That’s why I’m tempted to predict a victory for Leto, who has found baffling awards traction for “The Little Things”: It just wouldn’t feel like the Globes without one chaotic win at the top of the show.

Emerald Fennell, “Promising Young Woman”
David Fincher, “Mank”
Regina King, “One Night in Miami”
Aaron Sorkin, “The Trial of the Chicago 7”
Chloé Zhao, “Nomadland”

This category often goes to the most technically tricky movie, which would seem to favor Fincher for the gleaming, expensive “Mank.” But Zhao is considered an Oscar front-runner and the H.F.P.A. has taken plenty of heat for rarely recognizing women in this race. I project Zhao will become the first female director to triumph here in almost four decades, since Barbra Streisand won this Globe for “Yentl.”

Emerald Fennell, “Promising Young Woman”
Jack Fincher, “Mank”
Aaron Sorkin, “The Trial of the Chicago 7”
Christopher Hampton, Florian Zeller, “The Father”
Chloé Zhao, “Nomadland”

It’s the promising upstart Fennell vs. the veteran Sorkin in this category. If the H.F.P.A. decides Zhao is their best-director pick, the screenplay race offers a much more natural place to reward Sorkin, and I expect the voters will seize the opportunity.

“Another Round”
“La Llorona”
“The Life Ahead”
“Minari”
“Two of Us”

The immigrant story “Minari” couldn’t be more American, but an outdated H.F.P.A. rule shuffles it off to the foreign-film category because its characters often speak in Korean, and an even more pernicious rule decrees that those foreign films then aren’t eligible for a best-drama nomination. Knowing this, the Globes will probably reward “Minari” in an attempt to tamp down all the controversy, but the real win would be scrapping those rules altogether next time.

“The Croods: A New Age”
“Onward”
“Over the Moon”
“Soul”
“Wolfwalkers”

The much-admired “Wolfwalkers” has underdog potential, and the Globes often go for that: Just last year, the far more modest “Missing Link” won over juggernauts like “Toy Story 4” and “Frozen 2.” That said, I’m still projecting Pixar’s “Soul” to win, as it showed enough strength with the H.F.P.A. to nab one other nomination. Speaking of which …

Alexandre Desplat, “The Midnight Sky”
Ludwig Goransson, “Tenet”
James Newton Howard, “News of the World”
Trent Reznor, Atticus Ross, “Mank”
Trent Reznor, Atticus Ross, Jon Batiste, “Soul”

Reznor and Ross are double nominees here — and will probably repeat at the Oscars — but in a best-score category, you have to assume the film about music has the edge. Expect their work with Jon Batiste on “Soul” to triumph.

“Fight for You” (“Judas and the Black Messiah”)
“Hear My Voice” (“The Trial of the Chicago 7”)
“Io Sì” (“The Life Ahead”)
“Speak Now” (“One Night in Miami”)
“Tigress & Tweed” (“The United States vs. Billie Holiday”)

Leslie Odom Jr. and Andra Day received dual nominations for acting and songwriting in their films, but the Globes clearly preferred “One Night in Miami” (which also got a best-director nomination) to Day’s Billie Holiday biopic, so “Speak Now,” which Odom wrote with Sam Ashworth, has a better shot at being heard here.

Read original article here

NFL franchise tag candidates and 2021 predictions

Dallas Cowboys quarterback Dak Prescott, Green Bay Packers running back Aaron Jones and Los Angeles Chargers tight end Hunter Henry are targets for the NFL franchise-tag designation entering the 2021 season.

Prior to NFL free agency starting March 17, each of the 32 teams must evaluate whether they will place a franchise tag on veteran players to keep them off the open market.

The franchise tag is a labor designation that restricts a player’s potential movement in exchange for a high one-year salary. Each team can put the franchise tag on one pending free agent, a decision that is pricey but also provides leverage against losing a player, ensuring the team a large return if that player ultimately departs the club.

The franchise tag window begins Tuesday, and teams have until March 9 at 4 p.m. ET to place the tag on their most valuable player.

Different challenges will happen this year for both sides because the tags will pay less because of the lowered salary cap, which has a cap floor of $180 million. (The tag is calculated by taking the average of the top five players’ cap percentage at the position for the 2020 season or 120% of the player’s previous year salary — whichever is greater.)

We asked our NFL Nation reporters to identify the players most likely to get tagged and make their predictions on what will happen over the next two weeks. By our count, 21 teams are contemplating using the franchise tag:

Jump to:
ATL | BUF | BAL | CAR
CIN | CHI | DAL
| DEN
DET | GNB | HOU | LAC
JAX | NE | NOR | NYG | NYJ
SEA | TB | TEN | WSH

Keanu Neal, safety

After missing nearly all of the 2018 and 2019 seasons because of injuries, Neal bounced back with 100 tackles and an interception in 2020 while playing on the fifth-year option. Neal thrived in his first two years, too, so he’s definitely an impact player when healthy. There might be a question of whether he fits into the new scheme, and that could be the reason the Falcons don’t tag him, but having a consistent player in the secondary is not something to take for granted.

Prediction: Neal is a good, young safety and can be a key part of the defense, so the Falcons tag him. — Michael DiRocco


Matt Milano, linebacker

It’s not a very likely scenario, but there is a world in which the Bills apply the franchise tag on Milano if they’re unable to come to a long-term agreement. He is Buffalo’s most valuable free agent — and thus its most difficult to sign, likely commanding north of $13 million per year in an ordinary offseason. Bills general manager Brandon Beane gave Milano his blessing to seek the biggest payday elsewhere, making the franchise tag a reach; you just never know in this league, but don’t hold your breath in this situation.

Prediction: The Bills won’t use the franchise tag on Milano. — Marcel Louis-Jacques


Matthew Judon or Yannick Ngakoue, outside linebackers

It’s prohibitive for the Ravens to use the tag on either Judon or Ngakoue because it would take up nearly all of Baltimore’s salary-cap space to do so, and you can make the argument that there isn’t value to putting the tag on either of them. Judon totaled six sacks last season, and Ngakoue didn’t seem to be a great fit. But the Ravens have to at least consider it. Without the tag, Judon and Ngakoue are likely getting more lucrative deals elsewhere. Given the cap restraints, the Ravens can address outside linebacker by re-signing Tyus Bowser and selecting a pass-rusher early in this year’s draft.

Prediction: The Ravens won’t use the tag this year, marking the fourth time in five years Baltimore won’t tag a player. — Jamison Hensley


Taylor Moton, right tackle

Locking down 2017 second-round pick Moton for the upcoming season is a must for a Carolina team that has one starting offensive lineman (center Matt Paradis) under contract. Moton allowed three sacks last season and hasn’t missed a start the past three seasons. If a long-term deal can’t be reached, the Panthers would use the tag on him, which would cost an estimated $13.6 million. Releasing Pro Bowl defensive tackle Kawann Short gives the team cap room to make sure Moton doesn’t get away.

Prediction: The Panthers will use the franchise tag on Moton if a long-term deal cannot be worked out before the new league year begins. — David Newton


Carl Lawson, defensive end

Lawson finished his rookie deal as the Bengals’ most disruptive pass-rusher. However, he tallied 5.5 sacks, which could prevent the Bengals from paying the franchise tag worth an estimated $17.8 million, per Over The Cap. But Lawson is more disruptive than the raw numbers indicate. He created 10.5 sacks (via an ESPN metric powered by NFL Next Gen Stats), good for seventh in the league last season. As of now, it seems unlikely the Bengals use the tag on Lawson. That being said, don’t be shocked if Lawson commands a high salary on the open market.

Prediction: The Bengals won’t use the franchise tag on Lawson. — Ben Baby


Allen Robinson II, wide receiver

The Bears’ offense without Robinson, 27, looks pretty grim, which makes tagging the wide receiver, who caught 120 passes for 1,250 yards and six touchdowns last season, a strong possibility. Chicago is also prioritizing finding the quarterback who would be throwing Robinson passes and ultimately could determine whether the receiver would want to sign a long-term deal if tagged. The cost of tagging Robinson is $16.4 million. The Bears are already in a tight predicament with the salary cap, so they’ll need to create space by restructuring contracts or releasing expensive veterans (e.g. Jimmy Graham). It’s also wise not to rule out a tag-and-trade scenario for Robinson depending on how things play out for Chicago in free agency.

Prediction: The Bears will use the franchise tag on Robinson. — Courtney Cronin

play

1:52

Rob Ninkovich and Ryan Clark make the case for the Bears pursuing Deshaun Watson.

Dak Prescott, quarterback

Without a long-term deal by March 9, the Cowboys will tag Prescott for the second straight year and it will cost $37.7 million against the cap. It would also set in motion the likelihood that 2021 could be Prescott’s final season in Dallas. These talks are entering their third offseason, so maybe the two sides will be able to find a compromise. Is Prescott worth it? The Cowboys went 4-7 without him in 2020, and the offense scored one touchdown in the first three games Dallas played after he suffered his ankle injury.

Prediction: The Cowboys will use the franchise tag on Prescott. — Todd Archer


Justin Simmons, safety

The Broncos keep saying they want to work something out with Simmons, and Simmons has said he would like to stay. But both sides also say it all has to come together on their side of the negotiating table, too. Ultimately, a long-term deal makes the most sense, and it likely would not help matters toward a long-term deal if the team used the franchise tag on the safety for the second consecutive year. Simmons is really the only player among the Broncos’ potential unrestricted free agents worth discussing when it comes to the tag, and it would be a potential short-term solution — again.

Prediction: The Broncos will use the franchise tag on Simmons only to give them more time to get a long-term deal done. — Jeff Legwold


Kenny Golladay, wide receiver

The Lions have a decision to make with their Pro Bowl wide receiver who missed 11 games last season because of hamstring and hip injuries. Golladay, 27, appeared to be a candidate for a long-term deal under the previous regime, but that never materialized. Now that the Lions are in a rebuild under a new head coach/general manager combo in Dan Campbell and Brad Holmes, the franchise must decide whether to sign Golladay to a long-term extension, tag him, tag him with the potential intent to trade him or let him walk. Detroit, which needs wide receivers desperately, could do any of those things considering its multiyear plan to return to competitiveness.

Prediction: The Lions will use the franchise tag on Golladay. — Michael Rothstein


Aaron Jones, running back

The Packers weren’t willing to guarantee a significant portion of the contract they offered Jones during the season, but they would clearly like him back. Tagging him might be their best option, securing his services for one more season at around $11 million. But there are two things to consider: the difficulty of fitting that tag under the salary cap and Jones’ potential unwillingness to play for the tag.

Prediction: The Packers won’t use the franchise tag on Jones. — Rob Demovsky

play

1:07

Booger McFarland doesn’t see the Packers moving on from Aaron Rodgers anytime soon.

Will Fuller V, wide receiver

In 2020, Fuller was well on his way to proving he could stay healthy and be a No. 1 wide receiver before he was suspended for violating the NFL’s policy on performance-enhancing substances. Even after Fuller was suspended, quarterback Deshaun Watson said he wanted the receiver back in 2021. Could the Texans tag Fuller to try to make Watson change his mind about wanting a trade? Maybe. Houston saved $17.5 million by releasing J.J. Watt and have other players they could release or contracts they can restructure to make the $16.4 million franchise tag work.

Prediction: The Texans won’t use the franchise tag on Fuller. — Sarah Barshop


Hunter Henry, tight end

Henry, 26, was franchised last season because of injury concerns. He played in all but the last two games of this season after being placed on the reserve/COVID-19 list. If the Chargers franchise tag him for a second straight year, his 2021 salary will be $12.7 million. The 6-foot-5 tight end had a standout season with 60 receptions, 613 receiving yards and four touchdowns. The Chargers need a reliable target for quarterback Justin Herbert.

Prediction: The Chargers will use the franchise tag on Henry. — Shelley Smith


Cam Robinson, left tackle

Robinson hasn’t progressed significantly from his rookie season (2017). His best season was 2019 when he ranked 57th among tackles in pass block win rate, per ESPN Stats & Information research, and he ranked 59th in 2020. The franchise tag, which is estimated to be around $13.2 million, looks like a better option than signing Robinson to a long-term deal. Take one more year to see if and how much he improves. The Jaguars have the most salary-cap space available (approximately $74 million), so they definitely could afford Trent Williams, who might get $18 million to $20 million annually. Coach Urban Meyer recently said he likes the offensive line, so that might be an indication the Jaguars are willing to stick with Robinson at least one more year.

Prediction: Robinson hasn’t made enough progress to warrant the franchise tag. The Jaguars won’t tag him. — Michael DiRocco


Joe Thuney, left guard

This seems highly unlikely, but because Thuney was tagged last year, he at least falls into the category of possibilities this year. It would be a 120% increase from his $14.7 million tag in 2020, and it’s hard to believe the Patriots would want to eat up $17.737 million in cap space with other pressing needs. The sides had all of 2019 and up to July 2020 to reach an extension, and there seemed to be little momentum to do so.

Prediction: The Patriots won’t use the franchise tag on Thuney. — Mike Reiss


Marcus Williams, safety

The Saints have severe salary-cap restraints on them this year, so it’s unlikely they will use the franchise tag on anyone. But safety is the most affordable position in the league when it comes to the franchise tag ($11.4 million last year). It’s not out of the question the Saints would consider using it to secure one of their most important young defensive playmakers. The free safety has been a starter ever since he was drafted in the second round in 2017 and arguably had his best season in 2020. Williams has 14 career interceptions, including the playoffs.

Prediction: The Saints won’t use the franchise tag on Williams. — Mike Triplett


Leonard Williams, defensive lineman

This would be more as a short-term placeholder than anything else. This isn’t the year to put a $19.4 million cap charge on the books. The Giants franchised Williams last year, and now it would be 120% of that $16.1 million salary for 2021. The goal is to sign Williams to a long-term deal. But the franchise tag could buy the two sides some more time, if necessary. Williams is going to get paid. He was worth $16 million off a half-sack season. What’s he worth now off a career-best 11.5 sacks? A lot.

Prediction: Williams signs a long-term deal with the Giants before the franchise tag deadline at just under $20 million per season. — Jordan Raanan


Marcus Maye, safety

The projected tag amount at safety ($11.2 million) isn’t ridiculous, so the Jets could utilize the tag for the first time since 2016 (Muhammad Wilkerson). The goal is to sign Maye, who was voted by teammates as the Jets’ MVP in 2020, to a long-term contract. The tag would buy more time if they can’t get it done by March 9. A year ago, general manager Joe Douglas admittedly miscalculated the market and lost wide receiver Robby Anderson in free agency. He doesn’t want that to happen with Maye, who is likely to land a deal that pays him in the neighborhood of $10 million to $12 million per year.

Prediction: The Jets and Maye will reach a long-term agreement, avoiding New York from having to use the franchise tag. — Rich Cimini


Shaquill Griffin, cornerback

Griffin likely wants to be paid like a top-five cornerback, which might be too steep for the Seahawks as they look to extend Jamal Adams on what could be a record contract for a safety. That would bring the tag into play at an estimated cost of $15.266 million, per Over The Cap. If the Seahawks aren’t confident they can get a deal done with Griffin and anticipate a strong market for the 25-year-old Pro Bowler, they’d have to consider tagging and trading him like they did two years ago with Frank Clark.

Prediction: The Seahawks won’t use the franchise tag on Griffin. — Brady Henderson

play

1:39

Mina Kimes reacts to Russell Wilson’s frustrations that he is getting hit too much.

Chris Godwin, wide receiver

There’s no way the Bucs will allow Godwin to leave if at all possible. But if they can’t work out a long-term deal, Godwin will be their top franchise tag candidate and it would cost Tampa Bay roughly $16.5 million. Sure, they could franchise tag outside linebacker Shaquil Barrett again instead, but it would cost them 120% more than what they tagged him with last year, which would be roughly $19 million this year — not exactly cap friendly when the team has a projected $30 million in space available for 2021.

Prediction: The Buccaneers will use the franchise tag on Godwin with the hopes of making a long-term extension happen. — Jenna Laine


Jonnu Smith, tight end

The Titans are well aware of Smith’s value as a pass-catcher, especially in the red zone where he hauled in eight touchdowns last season. Smith has become a preferred target for quarterback Ryan Tannehill. There was a dip in Smith’s involvement once left tackle Taylor Lewan was placed on injured reserve in November. The Titans utilized Smith’s blocking ability to help Lewan’s backups. The franchise tag will cost $10.2 million, but it will give Tennessee time to negotiate a long-term deal with Smith, who is only 25 years old.

Prediction: The Titans will place the franchise tag on Smith and work on a long-term deal to keep him in Tennessee for a while. — Turron Davenport


Washington Football Team

Brandon Scherff, right guard

Coach Ron Rivera has said he wants to build strong lines on both sides of the ball. Scherff was a first-team All-Pro last season — the first by any player here since 1996. He’s also a four-time Pro Bowler. Durability has been a concern as Scherff hasn’t played a full season since 2016 and his 13 games played this past season were his most since 2017. There’s no doubt about his impact when he plays, with his ability to win at the line and on the move. However, because of his stature, he would command around $15 million per year — the highest for a guard. Washington used the franchise tag on him last year at a cost of $15.03 million. If tagged again, he would receive a 20% bump, so there’s not much incentive on his end to get a deal done knowing he could make $18 million on a one-year deal.

Prediction: Washington will use the franchise tag on Scherff, but it will be with the idea of continuing to negotiate and, ultimately, reach a deal. It might just take a while to get there. — John Keim

Read original article here

College basketball picks, schedule: Predictions, odds for Villanova vs. UConn and other key games

We are just three weeks away from Selection Sunday i, folks. Four! That’s 22 days from Saturday. Just over 500 hours. 32,000 minutes (and change). But who’s counting, right?

That creeping deadline means conference races are coming down to the wire across the country as teams jockey for NCAA Tournament seeding, and the stakes for each game from here on out get ratcheted up a notch. It’s why Saturday’s slate of games, with March Madness nearly upon us, should be a nice little appetizer to whet your college hoops whistle ahead of next month.

On tap are six top-10 teams taking the court, four of whom are on the road, along with critical showdowns in the Big 12, SEC, Big Ten, Big East and — OK, you get it: everywhere.

So to get the juicing flowing for the big day ahead, our staff has done the leg work to make picks straight up and against the spread for Saturday’s big games below.

UConn at No. 10 Villanova

Latest Odds:

Villanova Wildcats
-6.5

When: 1 p.m. | Where: Finneran Pavilion in Villanova, Pennsylvania
TV: Fox | Live stream: fuboTV (Try for free) 

UConn could really use a win of this magnitude to safely propel itself onto the right side of the tournament bubble. And after welcoming back James Bouknight this week, who returned from injury with a bang, I’m going to give the Huskies a vote of confidence in this spot. Villanova is the better team with the better record, but UConn is a different team with Bouknight and needs this one bad. Could be a good chance to kick Nova while its down after it took a surprisingly lopsided loss at the hands of Creighton last Saturday. Prediction: UConn 78, Villanova 74. — Kyle Boone

Kentucky at No. 19 Tennessee

Latest Odds:

Tennessee Volunteers
-7.5

When: 1 p.m. | Where: Thompson-Boling Arena in Knoxville, Tennessee
TV: CBS | Live stream:  CBSSports.com, CBS Sports App (Free)
OTT: CBS Sports App (Apple TV, Roku, Fire TV, Chromecast) 

Prediction: Tennessee is the better team, but Kentucky is playing at a higher level than it was during the first meeting just two weeks ago. The Volunteers should win, but it might be closer than most people thinkPrediction: Tennessee 71, Kentucky 67 — David Cobb

No. 15 Texas Tech at No. 23 Kansas

Latest Odds:

Kansas Jayhawks
-1.5

When: 2 p.m. | Where: Allen Fieldhouse in Lawrence, Kansas
TV: ESPN | Live stream: fuboTV (Try for free) 

During Kansas’ four-game winning streak, only one win — Oklahoma State — came against a team that has won more than one game in Big 12 play. So that streak is a tad misleading. Still, KU seems to be figuring out its defense as the season wears on. So if it’s a defensive battle like the last time these two teams met, I like the Jayhawks to get the season sweep. And that’s indeed how I think this one could shape up. Prediction: Kansas 71, Texas Tech 67. — Kyle Boone

No. 13 West Virginia at No. 12 Texas

Latest Odds:

Texas Longhorns
-3

When: 3 p.m. | Where: Frank Erwin Center in Austin, Texas
TV: ABC | Live stream: fuboTV (Try for free) 

Between COVID interruptions and bad fortunes in close games, Texas’ 10-1 start to the season has turned into a 13-5 record overall after a rocky month. But a week layover after two consecutive wins should be time enough to help propel it to one of its biggest games remaining in the regular season. At full strength, I like the Longhorns here to get the season sweep on the Mountaineers. Talented, deep and experienced enough to give West Virginia real fits where its strengths lie. Prediction: Texas 80, West Virginia 74. — Kyle Boone

No. 5 Illinois at Minnesota

Latest Odds:

Illinois Fighting Illini
-4.5

When: 3:30 p.m. | Where: Williams Arena in Minneapolis, Minnesota
TV: Fox | Live stream: fuboTV (Try for free) 

As a home team this season, Minnesota is 9-4-1 against the spread and a perfect 4-0 ATS as a home dog. So, no, I can’t bring myself to fade the Golden Gophers here. Not even against an Illini team that’s won six straight. Illinois, an upset alert has been issued. Norlander and I are riding Minnesota in an upset pick. Prediction: Minnesota 74, Illinois 71. — Kyle Boone

No. 7 Virginia at Duke

Latest Odds:

Virginia Cavaliers
-2

When: 8 p.m. | Where: Cameron Indoor Stadium in Durham, North Carolina
TV: ESPN | Live stream: fuboTV (Try for free) 

The loss of Jalen Johnson for Duke is a tough blow, but the Blue Devils have looked fine –even, dare I say, good! — during their recent two-game win streak. Additionally, they absolutely need this one to preserve any longshot chance of getting to the tourney. After UVA’s beatdown at the hands of Florida State, I’m convinced Duke can give the Cavaliers a game. Prediction: Duke 69, Virginia 67. — Kyle Boone

So who wins every college basketball game today? And which underdogs pull off stunning upsets? Visit SportsLine now to get picks for every game, all from the unbiased model that simulates every game 10,000 times, and find out.

require.config({"baseUrl":"https://sportsfly.cbsistatic.com/fly-155/bundles/sportsmediajs/js-build","config":{"version":{"fly/components/accordion":"1.0","fly/components/alert":"1.0","fly/components/base":"1.0","fly/components/carousel":"1.0","fly/components/dropdown":"1.0","fly/components/fixate":"1.0","fly/components/form-validate":"1.0","fly/components/image-gallery":"1.0","fly/components/iframe-messenger":"1.0","fly/components/load-more":"1.0","fly/components/load-more-article":"1.0","fly/components/load-more-scroll":"1.0","fly/components/loading":"1.0","fly/components/modal":"1.0","fly/components/modal-iframe":"1.0","fly/components/network-bar":"1.0","fly/components/poll":"1.0","fly/components/search-player":"1.0","fly/components/social-button":"1.0","fly/components/social-counts":"1.0","fly/components/social-links":"1.0","fly/components/tabs":"1.0","fly/components/video":"1.0","fly/libs/easy-xdm":"2.4.17.1","fly/libs/jquery.cookie":"1.2","fly/libs/jquery.throttle-debounce":"1.1","fly/libs/jquery.widget":"1.9.2","fly/libs/omniture.s-code":"1.0","fly/utils/jquery-mobile-init":"1.0","fly/libs/jquery.mobile":"1.3.2","fly/libs/backbone":"1.0.0","fly/libs/underscore":"1.5.1","fly/libs/jquery.easing":"1.3","fly/managers/ad":"2.0","fly/managers/components":"1.0","fly/managers/cookie":"1.0","fly/managers/debug":"1.0","fly/managers/geo":"1.0","fly/managers/gpt":"4.3","fly/managers/history":"2.0","fly/managers/madison":"1.0","fly/managers/social-authentication":"1.0","fly/utils/data-prefix":"1.0","fly/utils/data-selector":"1.0","fly/utils/function-natives":"1.0","fly/utils/guid":"1.0","fly/utils/log":"1.0","fly/utils/object-helper":"1.0","fly/utils/string-helper":"1.0","fly/utils/string-vars":"1.0","fly/utils/url-helper":"1.0","libs/jshashtable":"2.1","libs/select2":"3.5.1","libs/jsonp":"2.4.0","libs/jquery/mobile":"1.4.5","libs/modernizr.custom":"2.6.2","libs/velocity":"1.2.2","libs/dataTables":"1.10.6","libs/dataTables.fixedColumns":"3.0.4","libs/dataTables.fixedHeader":"2.1.2","libs/dateformat":"1.0.3","libs/waypoints/infinite":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/inview":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/jquery.waypoints":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/sticky":"3.1.1","libs/jquery/dotdotdot":"1.6.1","libs/jquery/flexslider":"2.1","libs/jquery/lazyload":"1.9.3","libs/jquery/maskedinput":"1.3.1","libs/jquery/marquee":"1.3.1","libs/jquery/numberformatter":"1.2.3","libs/jquery/placeholder":"0.2.4","libs/jquery/scrollbar":"0.1.6","libs/jquery/tablesorter":"2.0.5","libs/jquery/touchswipe":"1.6.18","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.core":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.draggable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.mouse":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.position":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.slider":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.sortable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.touch-punch":"0.2.3","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.autocomplete":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.accordion":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tabs":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.menu":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.dialog":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.resizable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.button":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tooltip":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.effects":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.datepicker":"1.11.4"}},"shim":{"liveconnection/managers/connection":{"deps":["liveconnection/libs/sockjs-0.3.4"]},"liveconnection/libs/sockjs-0.3.4":{"exports":"SockJS"},"libs/setValueFromArray":{"exports":"set"},"libs/getValueFromArray":{"exports":"get"},"fly/libs/jquery.mobile-1.3.2":["version!fly/utils/jquery-mobile-init"],"libs/backbone.marionette":{"deps":["jquery","version!fly/libs/underscore","version!fly/libs/backbone"],"exports":"Marionette"},"fly/libs/underscore-1.5.1":{"exports":"_"},"fly/libs/backbone-1.0.0":{"deps":["version!fly/libs/underscore","jquery"],"exports":"Backbone"},"libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tabs-1.11.4":["jquery","version!libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.core","version!fly/libs/jquery.widget"],"libs/jquery/flexslider-2.1":["jquery"],"libs/dataTables.fixedColumns-3.0.4":["jquery","version!libs/dataTables"],"libs/dataTables.fixedHeader-2.1.2":["jquery","version!libs/dataTables"],"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/app/VideoPlayer/AdobePass-min.js":["https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/util/Utils-min.js"]},"map":{"*":{"adobe-pass":"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/app/VideoPlayer/AdobePass-min.js","facebook":"https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js","facebook-debug":"https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all/debug.js","google":"https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js","google-platform":"https://apis.google.com/js/client:platform.js","google-csa":"https://www.google.com/adsense/search/async-ads.js","google-javascript-api":"https://www.google.com/jsapi","google-client-api":"https://apis.google.com/js/api:client.js","gpt":"https://securepubads.g.doubleclick.net/tag/js/gpt.js","newsroom":"https://c2.taboola.com/nr/cbsinteractive-cbssports/newsroom.js","recaptcha":"https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?onload=loadRecaptcha&render=explicit","recaptcha_ajax":"https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api/js/recaptcha_ajax.js","supreme-golf":"https://sgapps-staging.supremegolf.com/search/assets/js/bundle.js","taboola":"https://cdn.taboola.com/libtrc/cbsinteractive-cbssports/loader.js","twitter":"https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js","video-utils":"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/util/Utils-min.js"}},"waitSeconds":300});



Read original article here

College basketball picks, schedule: Predictions, odds for Michigan State vs. Iowa and other key games

College basketball steps into the spotlight this weekend for its first full slate of action after the NFL season concluded Sunday. And boy, it seems to have lucked into some favorable timing.

There are mid-major matchups with significant NCAA Tournament ramifications, major conference meetings with regular-season title stakes on the line and — as per usual this time of year — the all-important tourney bubble to monitor as March Madness comes into focus. Some teams will play their way onto the right side of it, while others may see theirs burst.

It adds an extra element of intrigue as you watch games this weekend. But of course, the most interesting element is the action behind the action. So to get you prepared for the big day ahead, we’ve got plays we like with picks straight up and against the spread from our staff below.

When: 1 p.m. | Where: Rupp Arena in Lexington, Kentucky
TV: CBS | Live stream:  CBSSports.com, CBS Sports App (Free)
OTT: CBS Sports App (Apple TV, Roku, Fire TV, Chromecast) 

This will be the fifth consecutive game I’ve picked Kentucky on the moneyline, so yes, I might have a problem. But UK has sucked me in. It held second-half leads in three of those but just hasn’t quite closed games the way Calipari-coached clubs typically do. Still, it feels like it is due for a turning point, which a game against Auburn could be. Wildcats have length and talent in the backcourt to limit Tigers guard Sharife Cooper, who has been their catalyst on offense. It’s impossible to completely stop him but slowing him — as I think they’re capable of doing — may be just enough to snap the four-game skid. Prediction: Kentucky 71, Auburn 69. — Kyle Boone

When: 1 p.m. | Where: WVU Coliseum in Morgantown, West Virginia
TV: ESPN+ | Live stream: fuboTV (Try for free) 

Among non-Baylor Big 12 teams, none are playing better than West Virginia. It won by double figures this week over Texas Tech on Tuesday and by a dozen over Kansas last Saturday, with its shot-making and skill on full display. The last time OU and WVU met, OU got the better of the two, but that was after blowing a huge lead at home. This time WVU will be more prepared and I expect it starts this game the way it finished when it outscored the Sooners 51-37 in the second half last month. Prediction: West Virginia 81, Oklahoma 75. — Kyle Boone

When: 2:30 p.m. | Where: Breslin Center in East Lansing, Michigan 
TV: Fox | Live stream: fuboTV (Try for free) 

NCAA Tournament hopes for Michigan State are all but completely stamped out, barring some miraculous turnaround. That has been the case for some time now. But still, Sparty has been competitive, with two consecutive wins over league opponents in the last week. Can it topple Iowa and its mighty offense? I have my doubts. This should nonetheless be plenty competitive in the Breslin Center as Tom Izzo rallies his troops for a big one. So I like MSU covering but Iowa straight up. Prediction: Iowa 80, Michigan State 76. — Kyle Boone

When: 5 p.m. | Where: CHI Heath Center Omaha in Omaha, Nebraska
TV: Fox | Live stream: fuboTV (Try for free) 

Home court advantage has been almost nonexistent for Creighton this season, which does influence my play here, because this is a perfect trap spot for a top-5 team in what is normally a hostile environment. Not taking the bait though. Nova’s a force perfectly equipped to go blow for blow with the Bluejays in Omaha — and any team on the road, really. They are 4-1 ATS as road favorites this season. Prediction: Villanova 75, Creighton 70. — Kyle Boone

When: 6 p.m. | Where: John Paul Jones Arena in Charlottesville, Virginia
TV: ESPN | Live stream: fuboTV (Try for free) 

Virginia has won the last six meetings against North Carolina by scoring 64, 56, 69, 71, 61 and 53 points. Lots of defense, offense — especially for UNC — at a minimal. Breaking that packline has been tough for the Tar Heels. If there’s a play in this one, I think betting the under is interesting. I also like UVA at home to keep its streak over Roy and Co. rolling. Prediction: Virginia 61, North Carolina 58. — Kyle Boone

So who wins every college basketball game today? And which underdogs pull off stunning upsets? Visit SportsLine now to get picks for every game, all from the unbiased model that simulates every game 10,000 times, and find out.

When: 12 p.m. | Where: Value City Arena in Columbus, Ohio
TV: ESPN2 | Live stream: fuboTV (Try for free) 

Indiana needs a win as it tries to play its way off the bubble and into the field. So a win over a top-5 Ohio State team would go a long ways. But it is coming off two tight wins over Iowa and Northwestern — the latter of which went to two overtimes on Wednesday — while Ohio State is coming off its fifth consecutive win. These teams aren’t in the same tier. I think the Hoosiers give it a good college try and get close, but the Buckeyes have too much juice to stumble here. Prediction: Ohio State 79, Indiana 75. — Kyle Boone

require.config({"baseUrl":"https://sportsfly.cbsistatic.com/fly-148/bundles/sportsmediajs/js-build","config":{"version":{"fly/components/accordion":"1.0","fly/components/alert":"1.0","fly/components/base":"1.0","fly/components/carousel":"1.0","fly/components/dropdown":"1.0","fly/components/fixate":"1.0","fly/components/form-validate":"1.0","fly/components/image-gallery":"1.0","fly/components/iframe-messenger":"1.0","fly/components/load-more":"1.0","fly/components/load-more-article":"1.0","fly/components/load-more-scroll":"1.0","fly/components/loading":"1.0","fly/components/modal":"1.0","fly/components/modal-iframe":"1.0","fly/components/network-bar":"1.0","fly/components/poll":"1.0","fly/components/search-player":"1.0","fly/components/social-button":"1.0","fly/components/social-counts":"1.0","fly/components/social-links":"1.0","fly/components/tabs":"1.0","fly/components/video":"1.0","fly/libs/easy-xdm":"2.4.17.1","fly/libs/jquery.cookie":"1.2","fly/libs/jquery.throttle-debounce":"1.1","fly/libs/jquery.widget":"1.9.2","fly/libs/omniture.s-code":"1.0","fly/utils/jquery-mobile-init":"1.0","fly/libs/jquery.mobile":"1.3.2","fly/libs/backbone":"1.0.0","fly/libs/underscore":"1.5.1","fly/libs/jquery.easing":"1.3","fly/managers/ad":"2.0","fly/managers/components":"1.0","fly/managers/cookie":"1.0","fly/managers/debug":"1.0","fly/managers/geo":"1.0","fly/managers/gpt":"4.3","fly/managers/history":"2.0","fly/managers/madison":"1.0","fly/managers/social-authentication":"1.0","fly/utils/data-prefix":"1.0","fly/utils/data-selector":"1.0","fly/utils/function-natives":"1.0","fly/utils/guid":"1.0","fly/utils/log":"1.0","fly/utils/object-helper":"1.0","fly/utils/string-helper":"1.0","fly/utils/string-vars":"1.0","fly/utils/url-helper":"1.0","libs/jshashtable":"2.1","libs/select2":"3.5.1","libs/jsonp":"2.4.0","libs/jquery/mobile":"1.4.5","libs/modernizr.custom":"2.6.2","libs/velocity":"1.2.2","libs/dataTables":"1.10.6","libs/dataTables.fixedColumns":"3.0.4","libs/dataTables.fixedHeader":"2.1.2","libs/dateformat":"1.0.3","libs/waypoints/infinite":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/inview":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/jquery.waypoints":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/sticky":"3.1.1","libs/jquery/dotdotdot":"1.6.1","libs/jquery/flexslider":"2.1","libs/jquery/lazyload":"1.9.3","libs/jquery/maskedinput":"1.3.1","libs/jquery/marquee":"1.3.1","libs/jquery/numberformatter":"1.2.3","libs/jquery/placeholder":"0.2.4","libs/jquery/scrollbar":"0.1.6","libs/jquery/tablesorter":"2.0.5","libs/jquery/touchswipe":"1.6.18","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.core":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.draggable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.mouse":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.position":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.slider":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.sortable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.touch-punch":"0.2.3","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.autocomplete":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.accordion":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tabs":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.menu":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.dialog":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.resizable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.button":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tooltip":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.effects":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.datepicker":"1.11.4"}},"shim":{"liveconnection/managers/connection":{"deps":["liveconnection/libs/sockjs-0.3.4"]},"liveconnection/libs/sockjs-0.3.4":{"exports":"SockJS"},"libs/setValueFromArray":{"exports":"set"},"libs/getValueFromArray":{"exports":"get"},"fly/libs/jquery.mobile-1.3.2":["version!fly/utils/jquery-mobile-init"],"libs/backbone.marionette":{"deps":["jquery","version!fly/libs/underscore","version!fly/libs/backbone"],"exports":"Marionette"},"fly/libs/underscore-1.5.1":{"exports":"_"},"fly/libs/backbone-1.0.0":{"deps":["version!fly/libs/underscore","jquery"],"exports":"Backbone"},"libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tabs-1.11.4":["jquery","version!libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.core","version!fly/libs/jquery.widget"],"libs/jquery/flexslider-2.1":["jquery"],"libs/dataTables.fixedColumns-3.0.4":["jquery","version!libs/dataTables"],"libs/dataTables.fixedHeader-2.1.2":["jquery","version!libs/dataTables"],"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/app/VideoPlayer/AdobePass-min.js":["https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/util/Utils-min.js"]},"map":{"*":{"adobe-pass":"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/app/VideoPlayer/AdobePass-min.js","facebook":"https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js","facebook-debug":"https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all/debug.js","google":"https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js","google-platform":"https://apis.google.com/js/client:platform.js","google-csa":"https://www.google.com/adsense/search/async-ads.js","google-javascript-api":"https://www.google.com/jsapi","google-client-api":"https://apis.google.com/js/api:client.js","gpt":"https://securepubads.g.doubleclick.net/tag/js/gpt.js","newsroom":"https://c2.taboola.com/nr/cbsinteractive-cbssports/newsroom.js","recaptcha":"https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?onload=loadRecaptcha&render=explicit","recaptcha_ajax":"https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api/js/recaptcha_ajax.js","supreme-golf":"https://sgapps-staging.supremegolf.com/search/assets/js/bundle.js","taboola":"https://cdn.taboola.com/libtrc/cbsinteractive-cbssports/loader.js","twitter":"https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js","video-utils":"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/util/Utils-min.js"}},"waitSeconds":300});



Read original article here

Golden Globes 2021: Final Nomination Predictions for Film

As the film awards season continues to take shape in this unconventional year, the Hollywood Foreign Press Association’s 72nd annual Golden Globes will be one of the first big needle movers for contenders. For films, the voting body has an opportunity to recognize a larger group of films and performances with its comedy and drama splits among the categories.

This year, films like “The Trial of the Chicago 7” and “Mank,” both from Netflix, could lead the tally, currently predicted for five nominations, which would mirror the same nomination tally as last year’s “The Irishman” from Martin Scorsese.

There doesn’t seem to be one film that could dominate with a wide-open year that could dominate, as seen in previous years, or long-standing records being broken. Currently, Robert Altman’s “Nashville” has the most nominations ever received with 11. Unless you’re predicting five men from Sorkin’s “Trial of the Chicago 7” taking up all available slots in best supporting actor, no film looks anywhere near touching this record.

However, Sacha Baron Cohen can break a record held by Jamie Foxx for receiving the most Golden Globe nominations in a single year. Foxx was nominated for three in 2004 for his performances in “Collateral,” “Ray” and “Redemption: The Stan Tookie Story.” Cohen could receive up to five nominations for best picture (comedy for “Borat”), actor (comedy for “Borat”), supporting actor (for “The Trial of the Chicago 7”), screenplay (co-writing “Borat”) and original song (co-writing “Wuhan Flu”). He’s currently predicted to receive two.

Down below, you can find the final Golden Globe nomination predictions in all the film categories.

MOTION PICTURE – DRAMA

  • “The Father” (Sony Pictures Classics)
  • “Nomadland” (Searchlight Pictures)
  • “Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom” (Netflix)
  • “Mank” (Netflix)
  • “The Trial of the Chicago 7” (Netflix)

ALTERNATE: “Judas and the Black Messiah” (Warner Bros.)

“Nomadland” has dominated the critics’ awards and should find its place among the nominated films. This could easily become a spot where Netflix takes up the remaining spots with their arsenal of films this year. “Mank,” “Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom” and “The Trial of the Chicago 7” seem like safe bets, but something with the European sensibilities like “The Father” could take one of the spots. It’s also rumored that the group really digs “Judas and the Black Messiah” and “The United States vs. Billie Holiday,” which we shouldn’t discount. The latter could emulate a former nominee like “Bohemian Rhapsody,” which won the category. I also have a sneaking suspicion that could see a tie occur, which would result in six nominees, something that hasn’t occurred since 2011, where “The Descendants” triumphed. It’s also important to note, just because films like “One Night in Miami,” “Promising Young Woman” and “Sound of Metal” are predicted to miss, and are ranked on the lower side of the charts, remember that films like “Capote,” “Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close” and an eventual best picture winner “Crash” all found best picture recognition without love from the HFPA.

MOTION PICTURE – COMEDY OR MUSICAL

  • “Borat Subsequent Moviefilm” (Amazon Studios)
  • “Hamilton” (Disney Plus)
  • “On the Rocks” (A24/Apple TV Plus)
  • “Palm Springs” (Hulu/Neon)
  • “The Prom” (Netflix)

ALTERNATE: “The Personal History of David Copperfield” (Searchlight Pictures)

There are two musicals from streamers in the mix, “Hamilton” from Disney Plus and “The Prom” from Netflix, that seem like assured spots. Simultaneously, the laughs of “Borat Subsequent Moviefilm,” along with likely having the two frontrunners of the Globes acting categories, will surely keep it in the conversation. “On the Rocks” and “Palm Springs” could be the strongest candidates for the final slots, but the European flavor of “The Personal History of David Copperfield” or the sheer star-power of “Wild Mountain Thyme” could get it over the hump. What’s interesting is, at least for the predicting moment, we may not have a best picture nominee come out of the top comedy category, which hadn’t occurred since 2009 when “The Hangover” reigned supreme.

MOTION PICTURE – ANIMATED

  • “Onward” (Pixar)
  • “Over the Moon” (Netflix)
  • “Soul” (Pixar)
  • “The Willoughbys” (Netflix)
  • “Wolfwalkers” (Apple TV Plus/GKIDS)

ALTERNATE: “The Croods: A New Age” (DreamWorks Animation)

The HFPA likes to typically stick with the populist selections in this category since its creation in 2006. There were 17 features submitted, as compared to the Academy’s 27, so this falls within the big four default choices — “Onward,” “Over the Moon,” “Soul” and “Wolfwalkers.” That last spot could be sprinkled with either “The Croods: A New Age” or “The Willoughbys,” the latter of which I’m giving the edge to. I also wouldn’t count out “Trolls: World Tour.”

MOTION PICTURE – FOREIGN LANGUAGE

  • “Another Round” (Denmark)
  • “La Llorona” (Guatemala)
  • “The Life Ahead” (Italy)
  • “Minari” (USA)
  • “Two Of Us” (France)

ALTERNATE: “I’m No Longer Here” (Mexico)

This category is not usually a strong indicator for the Academy Awards as they don’t just consider the country submissions, but also all foreign language films. There has already been quite a lot of controversy surrounding “Minari” being submitted in this category by A24 due to HFPA’s rules regarding languages. It may have helped it outside the category with contenders like Yuh-Jung Youn and Steven Yeun. Expect to see Sophia Loren’s star vehicle, “The Life Ahead,” to make an entry, especially since Italy’s official submission “Notturno” is not eligible due to its documentary status. Films like “Another Round” and “Two of Us” should find their way fairly easily, but it’ll be interesting if “I’m No Longer Here” or “La Llorona” get a spot that seems like it can go to a Spanish speaking feature.

BEST ACTOR – DRAMA

  • Riz Ahmed, “Sound of Metal” (Amazon Studios)
  • Chadwick Boseman, “Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom” (Netflix)
  • Anthony Hopkins, “The Father” (Sony Pictures Classics)
  • Delroy Lindo, “Da 5 Bloods” (Netflix)
  • Mads Mikkelsen, “Another Round” (Samuel Goldwyn Films)

ALTERNATE: Ben Affleck, “The Way Back” (Warner Bros.)

This is where it can get interesting as four of the predicted nominees feel safe for some love — Riz Ahmed, Chadwick Boseman, Anthony Hopkins and Delroy Lindo. That seemingly last spot could go to a variety of individuals. There’s a chance for European stars such as the currently predicted Mads Mikkelsen (“Another Round”) to pop up, who also has the best chance of any submitted international feature to find recognition outside the Oscars category. Colin Firth (“Supernova”), Jude Law (“The Nest”) and Tahar Rahim (“The Mauritanian”) also seem viable. Then there’s the star power of contenders like Ben Affleck (“The Way Back”), George Clooney (“The Midnight Sky”), Tom Hanks (“News of the World”) or one from the Washington family, John David (“Malcolm & Marie”) or Denzel (“The Little Things”).

BEST ACTOR – COMEDY OR MUSICAL

  • Sacha Baron Cohen, “Borat Subsequent Moviefilm” (Amazon Studios)
  • Jamie Dornan, “Wild Mountain Thyme” (Bleecker Street)
  • Leslie Odom, Jr, “Hamilton” (Disney Plus)
  • Dev Patel, “The Personal History of David Copperfield” (Searchlight Pictures)
  • Andy Samberg, “Palm Springs” (Hulu/Neon)

ALTERNATE: Will Ferrell, “Eurovision Song Contest: The Story of Fire Saga” (Netflix)

Sacha Baron Cohen won this award in 2006 for the first outing of “Borat.” He’ll be the first actor since Johnny Depp (“Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest”) to be nominated for a sequel performance, which coincidentally happened the year Cohen won. Doing a glance, if Cohen manages to win in this category, he would be the first in the category’s history to win for a sequel and its predecessor. The rest of the contenders is fluid as alternates like Will Ferrell (once nominated for “The Producers”), Lin-Manuel Miranda (former nominee for “Mary Poppins Returns”) and potential first-timers Michael Angelo Covino and James Corden could make some noise.

BEST ACTRESS – DRAMA

  • Viola Davis, “Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom” (Netflix)
  • Andra Day, “The United States vs. Billie Holiday” (Hulu)
  • Vanessa Kirby, “Pieces of a Woman” (Netflix)
  • Frances McDormand, “Nomadland” (Searchlight Pictures)
  • Carey Mulligan, “Promising Young Woman” (Focus Features)

ALTERNATE: Zendaya, “Malcolm & Marie” (Netflix)

This is the hardest category to predict of the film bunch. Davis and McDormand feel secure. There were some rumblings about members of the HFPA not really liking “Promising Young Woman,” which makes us a tad worried for Carey Mulligan, but we expect her to pull through. I also heard the group is loving “The United States vs. Billie Holiday,” which could help Andra Day make an entry. That leaves three Netflix contenders with Sophia Loren (“The Life Ahead”), Vanessa Kirby (“Pieces of a Woman”) and Zendaya (“Malcolm & Marie”) to wiggle their way through, assuming the rumors are correct. Perhaps this is another spot where six nominees show up, like at the Independent Spirit Awards?

BEST ACTRESS – COMEDY OR MUSICAL

  • Maria Bakalova, “Borat Subsequent Moviefilm” (Amazon Studios)
  • Emily Blunt, “Wild Mountain Thyme” (Bleecker Street)
  • Meryl Streep, “The Prom” (Netflix)
  • Michelle Pfeiffer, “French Exit” (Sony Pictures Classics)
  • Anya Taylor-Joy, “Emma.” (Focus Features)

ALTERNATE: Rashida Jones, “On the Rocks” (A24/Apple TV Plus)

One of the darlings of the awards circuit, Maria Bakalova, may be heavily in the running to win this category, which would make her the first since Maggie Smith (“California Suite”) to win this award and go on to be nominated in the supporting category. That’s assuming the Oscar love is real. Meryl Streep could be a double threat, like in 2009 when she won for “Julie and Julia” and was also nominated for “It’s Complicated.” This year, she has “The Prom” and Steven Soderbergh’s “Let Them All Talk.” After Emily Blunt received nods for “Salmon Fishing in the Yemen” and “The Young Victoria,” it’s undeniable that the group loves her. Again, playing to European tastes, Anya Taylor-Joy could squeeze out a nom for her turn in “Emma.”

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR – MOTION PICTURE

  • Kingsley Ben-Adir, “One Night in Miami” (Amazon Studios)
  • Chadwick Boseman, “Da 5 Bloods” (Netflix)
  • Daniel Kaluuya, “Judas and the Black Messiah” (Warner Bros.)
  • Bill Murray, “On the Rocks” (A24/Apple TV Plus)
  • Leslie Odom Jr, “One Night in Miami” (Amazon Studios)

ALTERNATE: Paul Raci, “Sound of Metal” (Amazon Studios)

This is where things could get crazy in the awards race. The HFPA is not always great at picking out large ensembles’ standout, proven by the shutout of “Spotlight” in the acting category in 2015. We have a few of those this year with “One Night in Miami” and “The Trial of the Chicago 7.” With the former, I’m suspecting Kingsley Ben-Adir to pop up with a mention, which will surely muddy his awards prospects since he’s lead for SAG and the Oscars. I wouldn’t be shocked to see him in lieu of co-star Leslie Odom Jr, who also could be nominated in the comedy category for “Hamilton.” The love for Sorkin’s film is big within the HFPA, with many standouts being cited, including Cohen, Frank Langella, Mark Rylance and Yahya Abdul-Mateen II. They might cancel each other out, making room for Bill Murray, who’s been nominated many times, including a win for “Lost in Translation.” Word through the grapevine also suggests that “Judas and the Black Messiah” is loved by them, which could start up the Daniel Kaluuya train to the Academy. And let’s not forget, this could also be the official starting point for first-time double posthumous nominee Chadwick Boseman. With star power always a factor with the L.A.-based journalists, I feel that could leave our season sweeper Paul Raci on the outside (at least just for the Globes).

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS – MOTION PICTURE

  • Ellen Burstyn, “Pieces of a Woman” (Netflix)
  • Olivia Colman, “The Father” (Sony Pictures Classics)
  • Jodie Foster, “The Mauritanian” (STXfilms)
  • Amanda Seyfried, “Mank” (Netflix)
  • Yuh-Jung Youn, “Minari” (A24)

ALTERNATE: Nicole Kidman, “The Prom” (Netflix)

Colman, Seyfried and Youn feel safe. Burstyn could be vulnerable if we’re in store for a shutout of “Pieces of a Woman” like at the Independent Spirit Awards. That could free up a spot or two for Jodie Foster, former Cecil B. Demille recipient, or Nicole Kidman, who they adore. This also could be a spot that gives hope to Glenn Close (“Hillbilly Elegy”) or Saoirse Ronan’s (“Ammonite”) Oscar prospects, if they can manage a mention. When it comes to this category at the Globes, they tend to stay within the realm of reason for contenders, even if their eventual nominees don’t translate (for example, Jennifer Lopez for “Hustlers” or Claire Foy for “First Man”). They tend to feel like they were in the number 6-7-8 spot of contender listings.

BEST DIRECTOR – MOTION PICTURE

  • George Clooney, “The Midnight Sky” (Netflix)
  • David Fincher, “Mank” (Netflix)
  • Spike Lee, “Da 5 Bloods” (Netflix)
  • Aaron Sorkin, “The Trial of the Chicago 7” (Netflix)
  • Chloé Zhao, “Nomadland” (Searchlight Pictures)

ALTERNATE: Florian Zeller, “The Father” (Sony Pictures Classics)

Last year’s Globes lineup for director matched 5/5 with the Academy, even when many thought Todd Phillips seemed like a long shot. But that match up doesn’t happen too often as the last time was with the 1980 film year (David Lynch, Roman Polanski, Robert Redford, Richard Rush, Martin Scorsese). In between, we usually get some big names like Peter Jackson (“King Kong”), which explains George Clooney’s prediction. They also love David Fincher, previously nominating him for “Gone Girl” and “The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo.” Now and again, we get a lone director in the lineup like Ridley Scott (“All the Money in the World”) or Tom Ford (“Nocturnal Animals”). That could be Spike Lee this year if “Da 5 Bloods” misses one of the available places. While many cross their fingers that Chloé Zhao will continue her streak with a nomination, she will be the first Asian woman to be nominated by the Globes, but won’t hold the same distinction at the Oscars as the first woman of color. Ava DuVernay was nominated for “Selma” in 2014. It should be noted, though, the HFPA has still only awarded one woman in this category in its history — Barbra Streisand for 1983’s “Yentl,” and she didn’t get nominated for an Oscar. It’s long past the time to close that 37-year gap. Let me also put on the record — watch out for Christopher Nolan (“Tenet”).

BEST SCREENPLAY – MOTION PICTURE

  • “Da 5 Bloods” (Netflix) – Danny Bilson, Paul De Meo, Kevin Willmott, Spike Lee
  • “Mank” (Netflix) – Jack Fincher
  • “Minari” (A24) – Lee Isaac Chung
  • “Nomadland” (Searchlight Pictures) – Chloé Zhao
  • “The Trial of the Chicago 7” (Netflix) – Aaron Sorkin

ALTERNATE: “The Father” (Sony Pictures Classics) – Christopher Hampton, Florian Zeller

They love Aaron Sorkin, plain and simple. Every feature script he’s written has been nominated by the HFPA, except 1993’s “Malice.” He’s a shoo-in for a nomination here. Since the category doesn’t separate based on original or adapted works, history has favored the former contenders. Expect some love for Fincher’s late father, Jack, along with a possible spot for Lee Isaac Chung.

BEST ORIGINAL SCORE – MOTION PICTURE

  • “Mank” (Netflix) – Trent Reznor, Atticus Ross
  • “News of the World” (Universal Pictures) – James Newton Howard
  • “Soul” (Pixar) – Trent Reznor, Atticus Ross, Jon Batiste
  • “Tenet” (Warner Bros.) – Ludwig Göransson
  • “The Trial of the Chicago 7” (Netflix) – Daniel Pemberton

ALTERNATE: “The Midnight Sky” (Netflix) – Alexandre Desplat

One of the clear signs of proof on how this group differs from the Academy, especially with the music branch. Over the last decade, seven of the winners have won the Oscar, which is a strong indicator. However, there are other instances where the winner fails to get nominated like “All is Lost” and “First Man.” Even Alexandre Desplat’s Oscar-winning “The Grand Budapest Hotel” was snubbed by the HFPA, though his other nominated work on “The Imitation Game” was shortlisted. Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross have won this race before and have managed two other nominations, all for Fincher films. Expect a double nomination for them this year, at least with the Globes, for “Mank” and “Soul.” The group also likes Daniel Pemberton quite a bit, as he’s been nominated three times despite never receiving AMPAS love. Ludwig Göransson feels like someone that will get a nomination but can’t figure out if it will be here or in original song (“The Plan” from “Tenet”). Flipping a coin feels like he could be here.

BEST ORIGINAL SONG – MOTION PICTURE

  • “Fight for You” from “Judas and the Black Messiah” (Warner Bros.) – H.E.R., Dernst Emile II, Tiara Thomas
  • “Io Si (Seen)” from “The Life Ahead” (Netflix) – Diane Warren, Laura Pausini, Niccolò Agliardi
  • “Speak Now” from “One Night in Miami” (Amazon Studios) – Leslie Odom Jr, Sam Ashworth
  • “Everybody Cries” from “The Outpost” (Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment) – Rod Lurie, Larry Groupé, Rita Wilson
  • “Hear My Voice” from “The Trial of the Chicago 7” (Netflix) – Daniel Pemberton, Celeste

ALTERNATE: “Húsavík” from “Eurovision Song Contest: The Story of Fire Saga” (Netflix) – Savan Kotecha, Rickard Goransson, fat max Gsus

This is the one HFPA category where it’s difficult to follow the history that could provide eventual nominees hints. They obviously have chosen the Oscar frontrunners (like “City of Stars” from “La La Land”), chart-topping pop songs (“Skyfall” from “Skyfall”), and others that, quite frankly, can’t be explained (like “Masterpiece” from “W.E.”). It seems to all boil down to, follow the famous people. H.E.R., Diane Warren, Leslie Odom Jr feel like those selections, and also can translate to the Academy. “The Outpost” feels like that surprise entry on the day while the Daniel Pemberton love looks appropriate, especially considering he was nominated for “Gold.”

2021 Golden Globes Predictions (Film)

2020-2021 Golden Globes Awards Timeline

  • Nominations for the 78th Annual Golden Globe Awards are announced at 8:35 a.m. ET / 5:35 a.m. PT – Feb. 3, 2021
  • Final ballots mailed to all HFPA members by Ernst & Young – Feb. 23, 2021
  • 78th Annual Golden Globe Awards will air live coast to coast at 8:00 p.m. ET / 5:00 p.m. PT on NBC from The Beverly Hilton in Beverly Hills, California – Feb. 28, 2021

 



Read original article here

2021 WWE Royal Rumble predictions, matches, card, start time, date, PPV preview, location

The annual Royal Rumble event, one of the most anticipated annual events on the WWE calendar and a company staple in the month of January, takes center stage on Sunday as the road to WrestleMania 37 opens up. The victors of the men’s and women’s Royal Rumble matches will, as usual, earn world championship opportunities at WrestleMania 37 in April.

In addition to the two Royal Rumble matches, there are two world title matches currently confirmed for the event. Roman Reigns will defend the universal championship against Kevin Owens in a Last Man Standing match, and the legendary Goldberg will return to the ring for the first time since WrestleMania 36 to challenge WWE champion Drew McIntyre.

The Royal Rumble will begin at 7 p.m. ET on Sunday, Jan. 31, with the show expected to last anywhere from 3-4 hours, not counting the kickoff show, which starts one hour prior to the main card at 6 p.m. CBS Sports will be with you the entire way on Sunday with live results, highlights and analysis.

For now, let’s take a look at how our experts believe the Royal Rumble will play out this Sunday. 

2021 WWE Royal Rumble predictions

Women’s Tag Team Championship: Asuka & Charlotte Flair (c) vs. Shayna Baszler & Nia Jax

It was ridiculous to put the titles on Asuka & Flair in the first place, and given that each are embroiled in separate singles storylines, it makes even less sense to keep the straps on them. Baszler & Jax were operating perfectly fine as champions and had a nice storyline setup with Mandy Rose & Dana Brooke. With the muscle friends now healthy and back in action, it would be hysterical — albeit depressing — for WWE to flip the titles back to the heels, but I think that’s exactly what they are going to wind up doing, completely eliminating any value from the champions’ current title run. Pick: Nia Jax & Shayna Baszler win the titles — Adam Silverstein (also Brent Brookhouse)

SmackDown Women’s Championship: Sasha Banks (c) vs. Carmella

Carmella has done a good job in her current heel run, and there’s no denying that she has improved as a performer. All that said, Banks is finally enjoying a title reign where she has managed to actually defend the title. It’s hard to see her run coming to an end against Carmella in what has been her first real storyline after winning the belt from Bayley. Banks is an appealing champion heading into WrestleMania, and a match featuring her in the champion role feels like a bigger deal than one with Carmella. It doesn’t feel like there’s much mystery to this one. Pick: Sasha Banks retains the title — Brookhouse (also Silverstein)

Universal Championship: Roman Reigns vs. Kevin Owens (Last Man Standing match)

As fun as a swerve Owens win would be, it just feels entirely unrealistic to expect WWE to cut off Reings’ run ahead of WrestleMania. Reigns has been the best attraction in the company since returning at SummerSlam and Owens has provided a good foil in recent months, but he’s never really seemed a threat to beat Reigns for the title. A Last Man Standing match does provide some outs to keep Owens strong (interference from Jey Uso), but he’s not leaving as universal champion. Pick: Roman Reigns retains the title — Brookhouse (also Silverstein)

WWE Championship: Drew McIntyre (c) vs. Goldberg

Fans were rightly enraged when Goldberg emerged on Legends Night to challenge McIntyre, particularly given the fact that the storyline to create the match did not make a shred of sense. With McIntyre out two weeks due to COVID-19, the temperature of fan resentment cooled down but so did any actual interest in this match. Though Goldberg has defeated heel Kevin Owens and “The Fiend” Bray Wyatt for the universal title twice — and WWE is building this championship as the lone world title Goldberg has never conquered — it would make absolutely zero sense to put him over the company’s top male babyface that it has spent the last year building. This should be a short match with McIntyre overcoming an early barrage of offense from Goldberg to retain the title and keep it at least until WrestleMania. Pick: Drew McIntyre retains the title — Silverstein (also Brookhouse)

Women’s Royal Rumble match

There are plenty of viable options to win the match, but none that accomplish what a Belair win would. She’s a big time talent who just needs the right storyline to fully break through to being a main event player. Belair showing off her strength and athleticism again in the Rumble while outlasting every other woman immediately establishes her in the title picture far better than her current awkward rivalry with Bayley. Pick: Bianca Belair wins — Brookhouse (also Silverstein)

Men’s Royal Rumble match

If there’s one thing WWE loves to do, it’s give legends main spots at the biggest PPV events of the year. That’s why Goldberg is facing McIntyre, that’s why Goldberg held a world title ahead of last year’s WrestleMania, that’s why The Rock’s name was tied to Reigns for WrestleMania before the lack of a sellout live crowd seemed to tank that. Edge wasn’t returning to be a full-time talent, but it seemed he was ready to be in big spots throughout the year. If WWE wants to take a big swing on an underdog to face Reigns at WrestleMania, Edge would tick a lot of the boxes they’re looking for. Daniel Bryan would also nicely fit the bill, but there’s an itch in the back of my mind saying Edge gets the feel-good moment and the Mania slot. Pick: Edge wins — Brookhouse

Edge announcing his return to WWE and entry into the Royal Rumble on Raw felt like a wasted surprise moment even if that’s what we got last year at this very event, but it did add a level of intrigue to the match because Edge (as predicted above) would make a ton of sense as a Royal Rumble winner and future McIntyre challenger. However, prior to Edge’s announcement, I believed that WWE would move in its best possible booking direction, which is putting Bryan over in the match as the WrestleMania challenger of Roman Reigns. There is a ready-made storyline between Bryan and Reigns dating back to 2014 when Bryan made his long-awaited return at the Royal Rumble only to unceremoniously be eliminated as Reigns went on to win the whole thing. Fans revolted, and that moment was the catalyst to continued dissatisfaction with Reigns as a face.

Seven years later, with Reigns now a heel, WWE can easily reach back and play off that storyline. We saw interactions between Bryan, Reigns and Jey Uso a couple of months ago, and I believe those were planting the seeds for the Road to WrestleMania. There are other legitimate possibilities to win this match, but Bryan makes the most sense by far. He could still earn a shot at Reigns through the Elimination Chamber, but why waste the perfect storyline? Pick: Daniel Bryan wins — Silverstein

require.config({"baseUrl":"https://sportsfly.cbsistatic.com/fly-133/bundles/sportsmediajs/js-build","config":{"version":{"fly/components/accordion":"1.0","fly/components/alert":"1.0","fly/components/base":"1.0","fly/components/carousel":"1.0","fly/components/dropdown":"1.0","fly/components/fixate":"1.0","fly/components/form-validate":"1.0","fly/components/image-gallery":"1.0","fly/components/iframe-messenger":"1.0","fly/components/load-more":"1.0","fly/components/load-more-article":"1.0","fly/components/load-more-scroll":"1.0","fly/components/loading":"1.0","fly/components/modal":"1.0","fly/components/modal-iframe":"1.0","fly/components/network-bar":"1.0","fly/components/poll":"1.0","fly/components/search-player":"1.0","fly/components/social-button":"1.0","fly/components/social-counts":"1.0","fly/components/social-links":"1.0","fly/components/tabs":"1.0","fly/components/video":"1.0","fly/libs/easy-xdm":"2.4.17.1","fly/libs/jquery.cookie":"1.2","fly/libs/jquery.throttle-debounce":"1.1","fly/libs/jquery.widget":"1.9.2","fly/libs/omniture.s-code":"1.0","fly/utils/jquery-mobile-init":"1.0","fly/libs/jquery.mobile":"1.3.2","fly/libs/backbone":"1.0.0","fly/libs/underscore":"1.5.1","fly/libs/jquery.easing":"1.3","fly/managers/ad":"2.0","fly/managers/components":"1.0","fly/managers/cookie":"1.0","fly/managers/debug":"1.0","fly/managers/geo":"1.0","fly/managers/gpt":"4.3","fly/managers/history":"2.0","fly/managers/madison":"1.0","fly/managers/social-authentication":"1.0","fly/utils/data-prefix":"1.0","fly/utils/data-selector":"1.0","fly/utils/function-natives":"1.0","fly/utils/guid":"1.0","fly/utils/log":"1.0","fly/utils/object-helper":"1.0","fly/utils/string-helper":"1.0","fly/utils/string-vars":"1.0","fly/utils/url-helper":"1.0","libs/jshashtable":"2.1","libs/select2":"3.5.1","libs/jsonp":"2.4.0","libs/jquery/mobile":"1.4.5","libs/modernizr.custom":"2.6.2","libs/velocity":"1.2.2","libs/dataTables":"1.10.6","libs/dataTables.fixedColumns":"3.0.4","libs/dataTables.fixedHeader":"2.1.2","libs/dateformat":"1.0.3","libs/waypoints/infinite":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/inview":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/jquery.waypoints":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/sticky":"3.1.1","libs/jquery/dotdotdot":"1.6.1","libs/jquery/flexslider":"2.1","libs/jquery/lazyload":"1.9.3","libs/jquery/maskedinput":"1.3.1","libs/jquery/marquee":"1.3.1","libs/jquery/numberformatter":"1.2.3","libs/jquery/placeholder":"0.2.4","libs/jquery/scrollbar":"0.1.6","libs/jquery/tablesorter":"2.0.5","libs/jquery/touchswipe":"1.6.18","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.core":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.draggable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.mouse":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.position":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.slider":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.sortable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.touch-punch":"0.2.3","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.autocomplete":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.accordion":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tabs":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.menu":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.dialog":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.resizable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.button":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tooltip":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.effects":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.datepicker":"1.11.4"}},"shim":{"liveconnection/managers/connection":{"deps":["liveconnection/libs/sockjs-0.3.4"]},"liveconnection/libs/sockjs-0.3.4":{"exports":"SockJS"},"libs/setValueFromArray":{"exports":"set"},"libs/getValueFromArray":{"exports":"get"},"fly/libs/jquery.mobile-1.3.2":["version!fly/utils/jquery-mobile-init"],"libs/backbone.marionette":{"deps":["jquery","version!fly/libs/underscore","version!fly/libs/backbone"],"exports":"Marionette"},"fly/libs/underscore-1.5.1":{"exports":"_"},"fly/libs/backbone-1.0.0":{"deps":["version!fly/libs/underscore","jquery"],"exports":"Backbone"},"libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tabs-1.11.4":["jquery","version!libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.core","version!fly/libs/jquery.widget"],"libs/jquery/flexslider-2.1":["jquery"],"libs/dataTables.fixedColumns-3.0.4":["jquery","version!libs/dataTables"],"libs/dataTables.fixedHeader-2.1.2":["jquery","version!libs/dataTables"],"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/app/VideoPlayer/AdobePass-min.js":["https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/util/Utils-min.js"]},"map":{"*":{"adobe-pass":"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/app/VideoPlayer/AdobePass-min.js","facebook":"https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js","facebook-debug":"https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all/debug.js","google":"https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js","google-platform":"https://apis.google.com/js/client:platform.js","google-csa":"https://www.google.com/adsense/search/async-ads.js","google-javascript-api":"https://www.google.com/jsapi","google-client-api":"https://apis.google.com/js/api:client.js","gpt":"https://securepubads.g.doubleclick.net/tag/js/gpt.js","newsroom":"https://c2.taboola.com/nr/cbsinteractive-cbssports/newsroom.js","recaptcha":"https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?onload=loadRecaptcha&render=explicit","recaptcha_ajax":"https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api/js/recaptcha_ajax.js","supreme-golf":"https://sgapps-staging.supremegolf.com/search/assets/js/bundle.js","taboola":"https://cdn.taboola.com/libtrc/cbsinteractive-cbssports/loader.js","twitter":"https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js","video-utils":"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/util/Utils-min.js"}},"waitSeconds":300});



Read original article here

5 Early Predictions for the 2021 NBA Trade Deadline | Bleacher Report

0 of 5

    Brett Davis/Associated Press

    The 2021 NBA trade deadline is now less than two months away, although a blockbuster four-team James Harden trade has already caused ripples throughout the league.

    Harden joining the Brooklyn Nets means other title contenders may now be pressured to upgrade their rosters while the Nets themselves look to build back some depth.

    Bradley Beal has become the name to watch as the league’s leading scorer is being wasted on the 3-9 Washington Wizards. He’s far from the only big name who could be moved, however.

    With activity already underway, here are some more transactions to look out for as the deadline draws closer.

1 of 5

    Tony Dejak/Associated Press

    Pairing James Harden with Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving seems like a cheat code on offense, although stripping the team of Jarrett Allen, Taurean Prince and Caris LeVert has severely hurt Brooklyn’s defense and depth.

    Since trading for Harden, the Nets have a defensive rating of 119.2, which ranks next-to-last in the NBA over that span.

    While one of those meetings was against a strong Milwaukee Bucks team, the Nets dropped two games to the Cleveland Cavaliers (who were missing Kevin Love), gave up 124 points to a Miami Heat squad without Jimmy Butler or Tyler Herro and allowed Nikola Vucevic of the Orlando Magic to light them up for 34 points on 63.6 percent shooting.

    Starting center DeAndre Jordan (5.8 points and 6.8 rebounds per game) hasn’t been this ineffective in nearly a decade and will get destroyed if he’s asked to defend Joel Embiid, Bam Adebayo or Giannis Antetokounmpo in a playoff series.

    The Nets can’t trade a first-round pick for the next eight drafts, which means they’re limited on upgrade opportunities.

    But JaVale McGee is one option. The 33-year-old is averaging 8.2 points, 6.2 rebounds and 1.1 blocks in just 16.8 minutes per game for the Cavaliers but has fallen out of the rotation behind Andre Drummond and Allen.

    The Nets were granted a $5.7 million disabled player exception from Spencer Dinwiddie’s season-ending ACL tear, and they could use it to absorb McGee’s $4.2 million salary. Sam Amico of FortyEightMinutes reported that the Nets and Cavs have already met twice to discuss a trade for the big man.

    Brooklyn could also use its exception to trade for fellow veteran centers like Ed Davis, Nerlens Noel or Bismack Biyombo.

2 of 5

    Eric Gay/Associated Press

    With the Houston Rockets in the middle of a complete makeover, P.J. Tucker is likely the next veteran out the door.

    Houston hasn’t been in any hurry to trade the 35-year-old, however, even offering him a contract extension, per The Athletic’s Kelly Iko and Sam Amick. They also noted that “teams have already made a number of phone calls to Houston about potentially acquiring Tucker.”

    The three-and-D power forward with an expiring $8 million contract should be one of the league’s easiest veterans to move. He’s played a key role on playoff teams in Houston and Toronto the past five years, able to start as a floor-stretching big or serve as a primary reserve.

    Since Tucker has refused to sign any extension Houston has offered, a trade seems inevitable.

    The Minnesota Timberwolves have “maintained contact” with the Rockets about Tucker, per The Athletic’s Jon Krawczynski. While they have a need at power forward, they’re also dead last in the West with a 4-11 record. Giving up anything of value for Tucker with the season slipping away seems questionable.

    Expect a contender to end up winning the Tucker sweepstakes instead.

    The Boston Celtics have needed a true power forward for years. The Brooklyn Nets, Portland Trail Blazers and Denver Nuggets all need defensive help, as well.

    With Russell Westbrook and James Harden both out of Houston, expect Tucker to be next.

3 of 5

    Rick Scuteri/Associated Press

    The Dallas Mavericks are good enough to make a deep playoff run now but should also be closely monitoring the 2021 free-agent class.

    With Kristaps Porzingis on a max deal and Luka Doncic eligible to sign his own extension this offseason, the Mavs’ last chance to make a big splash in free agency may be this summer.

    While some of the top potential free agents have already inked extensions that have taken them off the table, plenty of talent will still be available. Victor Oladipo, DeMar DeRozan, John Collins, Lauri Markkanen, Kyle Lowry and Andre Drummond will all be free agents, and each could help create a Big Three in Dallas.

    The Mavericks aren’t guaranteed to have space for a max salary yet, however.

    Josh Richardson carries an $11.6 million player option, and the Mavericks can choose whether they want to pay Willie Cauley-Stein $4.1 million next season.

    Dallas should be looking for roster upgrades now while getting some extra salary off the books for 2021-22.

    Drummond is on an expiring $28.8 million deal and should be available after the Cleveland Cavaliers traded for Jarrett Allen. The Mavs could build a deal around James Johnson and Dwight Powell, thereby removing the latter’s remaining two years and $22.8 million. Dallas is just 24th in rebounding this season (48.4 rebound percentage), while Drummond is nearly leading the NBA in glass-cleaning for the fourth consecutive season.

    Otto Porter Jr. ($28.5 million) and LaMarcus Aldridge ($24.0 million) could also work as pieces on expiring deals who are capable of helping now.

4 of 5

    Charles Rex Arbogast/Associated Press

    While a handful of young players (Jayson Tatum, Donovan Mitchell, Bam Adebayo, De’Aaron Fox, OG Anunoby, etc.) avoided free agency by signing extensions before the season, other young stars failed to come to an agreement with their current clubs.

    John Collins, Lauri Markkanen and Lonzo Ball will now become restricted free agents over the summer, leaving their futures with their current teams in doubt.

    Jarrett Allen was another player from the 2017 class who wasn’t extended. By not signing any additional contract with the Brooklyn Nets, he was eligible to be traded as part of the James Harden deal and will almost certainly re-up with the Cleveland Cavaliers. The Nets are already deep into the luxury tax, so a new deal for Allen would have put even more financial pressure on the franchise.

    A difference in money is likely the reason Collins, Markkanen and Ball aren’t under long-term deals, as well. It could also be the reason at least one of them gets traded before the deadline.

    John Collins wanted max money from the Atlanta Hawks but only got an offer in excess of $90 million, per ESPN’s Brian Windhorst. The Chicago Bulls and Markkanen were about $4 million apart in starting salary numbers, per K.C. Johnson of NBC Sports Chicago. Ball probably should have taken whatever reasonable offer the New Orleans Pelicans presented to him given his huge dip in play from last season.

    While Ball and Markkanen could still be moved, Collins seems like the most likely candidate.

    As a combo big, Collins is facing a crowded Hawks frontcourt with Clint Capela, Danilo Gallinari, Onyeka Okongwu and De’Andre Hunter, who’s passed Collins as the team’s second-leading scorer behind Trae Young.

    Since the Hawks might need to give the 23-year-old a max deal or lose him for nothing this offseason, expect him to be traded—and possibly Markkanen or Ball, as well.

5 of 5

    Andy Clayton-King/Associated Press

    A 6-9 record to start the season has the Miami Heat near the bottom of the Eastern Conference, in large part because of injuries and players missing games due to health and safety protocols related to COVID-19.

    While it’s still relatively early, the East is becoming far tougher than the version Miami finished on top of last campaign.

    The Philadelphia 76ers are off to a 12-5 start to lead the conference, the Brooklyn Nets could now have the NBA’s top offense with James Harden, and the Milwaukee Bucks should be better suited for the postseason with Jrue Holiday aboard.

    Miami should certainly feel pressure to do something, and a trade for Bradley Beal would be the ultimate response.

    The Miami Herald‘s Barry Jackson noted the Heat have a “high” interest level in trading for Beal should the 3-9 Washington Wizards make him available.

    While Jimmy Butler and Bam Adebayo would be off the table, a deal centered around Tyler Herro, Duncan Robinson and first-round picks in 2025 and 2027 should be enough to get Washington’s interest. Miami should be going all-in to win a title, especially since the 31-year-old Butler racked up a lot of early-career mileage while playing under Tom Thibodeau on the Chicago Bulls.

    The Wizards won’t want to trade Beal, but the 27-year-old could certainly ask his way out. With a 21-year-old star in the making likely on the table in Herro, they could get a nice return for their established star.



Read original article here

College basketball picks, schedule: Predictions, odds for Duke vs. Louisville and other key games Saturday

Last week’s college basketball action was as wild as we’ve seen this season. Six teams ranked in the AP Top 25 went down last Saturday — including five in the top-15 — all while the likes of North Carolina and Kentucky took hits as their respective seasons continued to slip away from preseason expectations. Now this Saturday sets up to potentially be just as consequential.

A total of 19 ranked teams are scheduled to play Saturday in a day that will be busy from noon until midnight, nine of which are on the road in potential trap spots.

Our panel of experts is on the case to break down every major game with picks straight up and against the spread, so if you want to scratch that gambling itch, let us give you the edge with some analysis and thoughts below.

Jonathan Coachman is joined by Mike McClure to dissect the best bets & props in hoops for Saturday on The Early Edge. Download and subscribe on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.  

When: 12 p.m. | Where: Fertitta Center in Houston
TV: CBS | Live stream:  CBSSports.com, CBS Sports App (Free)
OTT: CBS Sports App (Apple TV, Roku, Fire TV, Chromecast)

This Houston team is on an absolute tear and already has a 26-point victory over Temple on the resume. The Owls should be more competitive this time as they play on their home court on the heels of consecutive league victories. Still, the Cougars are an elite defensive squad poised to capitalize on Temple’s offensive struggles. Prediction: Houston 74, Temple 59 — David Cobb

Latest Odds:

Baylor Bears
-9

When: 2 p.m. | Where: Gallagher-Iba Arena in Stillwater, Oklahoma
TV: CBS | Live stream:  CBSSports.com, CBS Sports App (Free)
OTT: CBS Sports App (Apple TV, Roku, Fire TV, Chromecast) 

Oklahoma State has not been blown out or overwhelmed by anyone this season and is good enough to give Baylor the same type of challenge the Bears faced in games against Texas Tech and Kansas. But the Cowboys probably aren’t quite good enough to pull the upset Prediction: Baylor 86, Oklahoma State 79 — David Cobb

No. 15 Ohio State at No. 10 Wisconsin

Latest Odds:

Wisconsin Badgers
-5

When: 4 p.m. | Where: Kohl Center in Madison, Wisconsin
TV: CBS | Live stream:  CBSSports.com, CBS Sports App (Free)
OTT: CBS Sports App (Apple TV, Roku, Fire TV, Chromecast) 

The Big Ten is brutal and unpredictable, as was demonstrated again Thursday night when Indiana upset Iowa on the road and held the high-powered Hawkeyes without a field goal for 11 minutes in the second half. So while Wisconsin appears to be trending in the right direction and Ohio State is coming off a close loss, there’s really no sense into trying to read the meaning of recent results. This has the makings of another brutally contested conference game, and the Badgers get a slight edge only because of their defense, which should be able to manage an Ohio State team getting increasingly 3-point happy. Prediction: Wisconsin 68, Ohio State 66 — David Cobb  

When: 4 p.m. | Where: KFC Yum! Center in Louisville, Kentucky
TV: ESPN | Live stream: fuboTV (Try for free)

Neither Duke nor Louisville has a ton of momentum at its sails right now — Duke has lost its last two in close road contests and Louisville has also lost its last two. But the Cardinals have been better on the whole this season, they’re more experienced, and they’ve got the benefit of playing this one at home. I’ll lay the points with them here primarily as a show of faith in Carlik Jones, Louisville’s senior who is playing at an All-ACC level right now. Duke is just 1-2 on the season against the spread in a road environment, and Louisville is 5-5-1 against the number as a favorite. Prediction: Louisville 73, Duke 70 — Kyle Boone    

Latest Odds:

Tennessee Volunteers
-8.5

When: 8:30 p.m. | Where: Thompson-Boling Arena in Knoxville, Tennessee
TV: SEC Network | Live stream: fuboTV (Try for free)

Tennessee had a wake-up call earlier this week when it got shellacked — by 26 points — on the road against a shorthanded Florida team. But that outcome is aberrational in nature given how UT has played this season. It has been one of the SEC’s best and most consistent forces. As it returns home seeking a bounceback, I expect it gets exactly that — in impressive fashion to boot as it reasserts itself as one of the SEC’s true contenders. The Vols are 8-4 against the spread as a favorite and get it done here with a double-digit dub. Prediction: Tennessee 72, Missouri 61 — Kyle Boone    

No. 23 UConn at No. 11 Creighton

When: 12 p.m. | Where: CHI Health Center Omaha in Omaha, Nebraska
TV: Fox | Live stream: fuboTV (Try for free)

UConn remains without star James Bouknight, one of the best scorers in all of college basketball. So without him, I can’t pick the Huskies on the road — at least not straight up. Their only quality outing in his absence came against Butler two weeks ago, and since, they’ve lost to St. John’s at home and narrowly squeaked a win over DePaul. Good spot here for the Bluejays to establish some much-needed confidence after dropping their second straight earlier this week. Going to meet in the middle and take UConn against the number but Creighton to win comfortably. Prediction: Creighton 76, UConn 70 — Kyle Boone    

So who wins every college basketball game today? And which underdogs pull off stunning upsets? Visit SportsLine now to get picks for every game, all from the unbiased model that simulates every game 10,000 times, and find out.  

require.config({"baseUrl":"https://sportsfly.cbsistatic.com/fly-125/bundles/sportsmediajs/js-build","config":{"version":{"fly/components/accordion":"1.0","fly/components/alert":"1.0","fly/components/base":"1.0","fly/components/carousel":"1.0","fly/components/dropdown":"1.0","fly/components/fixate":"1.0","fly/components/form-validate":"1.0","fly/components/image-gallery":"1.0","fly/components/iframe-messenger":"1.0","fly/components/load-more":"1.0","fly/components/load-more-article":"1.0","fly/components/load-more-scroll":"1.0","fly/components/loading":"1.0","fly/components/modal":"1.0","fly/components/modal-iframe":"1.0","fly/components/network-bar":"1.0","fly/components/poll":"1.0","fly/components/search-player":"1.0","fly/components/social-button":"1.0","fly/components/social-counts":"1.0","fly/components/social-links":"1.0","fly/components/tabs":"1.0","fly/components/video":"1.0","fly/libs/easy-xdm":"2.4.17.1","fly/libs/jquery.cookie":"1.2","fly/libs/jquery.throttle-debounce":"1.1","fly/libs/jquery.widget":"1.9.2","fly/libs/omniture.s-code":"1.0","fly/utils/jquery-mobile-init":"1.0","fly/libs/jquery.mobile":"1.3.2","fly/libs/backbone":"1.0.0","fly/libs/underscore":"1.5.1","fly/libs/jquery.easing":"1.3","fly/managers/ad":"2.0","fly/managers/components":"1.0","fly/managers/cookie":"1.0","fly/managers/debug":"1.0","fly/managers/geo":"1.0","fly/managers/gpt":"4.3","fly/managers/history":"2.0","fly/managers/madison":"1.0","fly/managers/social-authentication":"1.0","fly/utils/data-prefix":"1.0","fly/utils/data-selector":"1.0","fly/utils/function-natives":"1.0","fly/utils/guid":"1.0","fly/utils/log":"1.0","fly/utils/object-helper":"1.0","fly/utils/string-helper":"1.0","fly/utils/string-vars":"1.0","fly/utils/url-helper":"1.0","libs/jshashtable":"2.1","libs/select2":"3.5.1","libs/jsonp":"2.4.0","libs/jquery/mobile":"1.4.5","libs/modernizr.custom":"2.6.2","libs/velocity":"1.2.2","libs/dataTables":"1.10.6","libs/dataTables.fixedColumns":"3.0.4","libs/dataTables.fixedHeader":"2.1.2","libs/dateformat":"1.0.3","libs/waypoints/infinite":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/inview":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/jquery.waypoints":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/sticky":"3.1.1","libs/jquery/dotdotdot":"1.6.1","libs/jquery/flexslider":"2.1","libs/jquery/lazyload":"1.9.3","libs/jquery/maskedinput":"1.3.1","libs/jquery/marquee":"1.3.1","libs/jquery/numberformatter":"1.2.3","libs/jquery/placeholder":"0.2.4","libs/jquery/scrollbar":"0.1.6","libs/jquery/tablesorter":"2.0.5","libs/jquery/touchswipe":"1.6.18","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.core":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.draggable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.mouse":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.position":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.slider":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.sortable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.touch-punch":"0.2.3","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.autocomplete":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.accordion":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tabs":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.menu":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.dialog":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.resizable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.button":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tooltip":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.effects":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.datepicker":"1.11.4"}},"shim":{"liveconnection/managers/connection":{"deps":["liveconnection/libs/sockjs-0.3.4"]},"liveconnection/libs/sockjs-0.3.4":{"exports":"SockJS"},"libs/setValueFromArray":{"exports":"set"},"libs/getValueFromArray":{"exports":"get"},"fly/libs/jquery.mobile-1.3.2":["version!fly/utils/jquery-mobile-init"],"libs/backbone.marionette":{"deps":["jquery","version!fly/libs/underscore","version!fly/libs/backbone"],"exports":"Marionette"},"fly/libs/underscore-1.5.1":{"exports":"_"},"fly/libs/backbone-1.0.0":{"deps":["version!fly/libs/underscore","jquery"],"exports":"Backbone"},"libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tabs-1.11.4":["jquery","version!libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.core","version!fly/libs/jquery.widget"],"libs/jquery/flexslider-2.1":["jquery"],"libs/dataTables.fixedColumns-3.0.4":["jquery","version!libs/dataTables"],"libs/dataTables.fixedHeader-2.1.2":["jquery","version!libs/dataTables"],"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/app/VideoPlayer/AdobePass-min.js":["https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/util/Utils-min.js"]},"map":{"*":{"adobe-pass":"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/app/VideoPlayer/AdobePass-min.js","facebook":"https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js","facebook-debug":"https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all/debug.js","google":"https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js","google-platform":"https://apis.google.com/js/client:platform.js","google-csa":"https://www.google.com/adsense/search/async-ads.js","google-javascript-api":"https://www.google.com/jsapi","google-client-api":"https://apis.google.com/js/api:client.js","gpt":"https://securepubads.g.doubleclick.net/tag/js/gpt.js","newsroom":"https://c2.taboola.com/nr/cbsinteractive-cbssports/newsroom.js","recaptcha":"https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?onload=loadRecaptcha&render=explicit","recaptcha_ajax":"https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api/js/recaptcha_ajax.js","supreme-golf":"https://sgapps-staging.supremegolf.com/search/assets/js/bundle.js","taboola":"https://cdn.taboola.com/libtrc/cbsinteractive-cbssports/loader.js","twitter":"https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js","video-utils":"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/util/Utils-min.js"}},"waitSeconds":300});



Read original article here

Alleged Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 specs and price predictions arrive just as more tech tipsters sound the death knell for the Galaxy Note series

, , , , , ,

search relation.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 

Read original article here