Tag Archives: Precarious

High Turnover of Home Caregivers Makes Life Precarious for Many

Mary Barket, a 66-year-old widow with a degenerative muscular disorder and no family around to help, has had seven different caregivers come through her home in the past six months.

On a recent Saturday morning, she was told by the home care agency that her caregiver wasn’t coming that day and that it couldn’t send a substitute, she says. Ms. Barket had one meal to last her until Monday, when the next caregiver was due.

“My hands don’t work. I can’t even open a box,” says Ms. Barket, who has ALS, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. “It’s a very tenuous situation.”

High turnover among in-home caregivers is straining the daily lives of America’s aging population, which relies on them to remain in their homes.

The median caregiver turnover rate—or the percentage of all caregivers who left or were terminated from jobs—was about 64.9% in 2021, according to a report by Home Care Pulse, a company that provides data and training to home care agencies. Though the number has improved from a peak of 81.6% in 2018, it represents a major supply gap, according to people in the home care industry.

Turnover among the 1,461 home care agencies participating in the 2022 HCP Benchmarking Report remained relatively stable during the pandemic, says Home Care Pulse president Todd Austin. Agencies increased wages and more offered benefits to recruit and retain workers, while also doing more to recognize workers as “care heroes” to improve job satisfaction, he says.

But the pandemic added to demand, as the high number of Covid deaths at long-term-care facilities contributed to the desire for people to remain in their homes.

Between 2008 and 2018, the number of home care workers more than doubled to 2.26 million from about 900,000, according to a 2022 report from the Home Care Association of America, an industry trade organization representing home care providers.

The Labor Department projects 25% employment growth in the next decade for home health and personal care aides, which includes those who work in group homes and day service programs, compared with an average expected growth rate of 5% for all occupations.

Even with rapid growth, home care agencies can’t meet demand. More than 85% of the home care agencies in the 2022 HCP Benchmarking Report turned down cases in 2021 due to the shortage, and 59.7% consistently turned down clients.

To help address the staffing problem, many home care agencies boosted incentives and bonuses and are offering training in areas like end-of-life care, meal planning and Alzheimer’s care, says Mr. Austin and others in the industry.

Ms. Espinosa helps Ms. Barket, who has ALS, change clothes.

Ms. Barket lives alone with no family in the area available to assist in her care. She relies on help from two home care agencies.

About 40% of agencies now offer signing bonuses, and 94% have increased pay, some by as much as $10 an hour based on experience, according to the 2022 report from the Home Care Association of America.

But wages remain relatively low. Median pay in 2021, the latest figure available, was $14.15 an hour, or $29,430 a year, for home health and personal care aides, according to the Labor Department.

The jobs are difficult in other ways, too—clients can be demanding, the work can be physically and emotionally taxing and the hours inconsistent.

Waiting list

In Lackawanna County, Pa., about 40 older adults are on a waiting list for in-home care, says

Jason Kavulich,

outgoing director of the county Area Agency on Aging, who was recently named Secretary of Aging for Pennsylvania. Six years ago, when he became director of the agency, there was no waiting list, he says.

“This is the postpandemic world,” says Mr. Kavulich. “People are not entering the help field. They have found other work.” To try to help meet demand, the county agency is working on a scholarship program at a local college for students to provide 15 to 18 hours of in-home care a week to older adults.

For families, high turnover adds a layer of uncertainty to the already stressful task of finding care for loved ones. Some families receive last-minute phone calls saying a worker isn’t coming, which leaves them scrambling to find a substitute so they themselves can go to work.

John Giurini, who shares a home with his 93-year-old mother and his sister in the Los Angeles area, says there had been times when he received a call the night before—or even the morning of—from the agency that provides full-time in-home care, saying the worker they expected for the next shift wasn’t available. Usually a substitute was sent but not always. 

“We would not know in the morning who was coming to the front door” other than a name, says Mr. Giurini, assistant director of public affairs at the J. Paul Getty Museum. 

He says rotating people in and out of the home is stressful for the family, but even more so for their mother, who has dementia and gets confused. One caregiver became combative with their mother about how much toothpaste she was using, and another young man ran personal errands instead of staying at the doctor’s office while their mother had a medical appointment, he says. He and his sister explored other options, including hiring a caregiver directly, rather than relying on an agency, but decided against it.

“Say you hire someone and are fortunate to find a good person. What happens when that person is sick?” he asks. An agency, at least, has other workers. Mr. Giurini says they have lucked out in the past six months with a caregiver from their agency who is attentive and professional.

They pay the agency $32 an hour and rates will increase to $35 an hour in February.

In-home care workers are generally employed by home care agencies, which are paid by individuals and families, or through private long-term-care insurance or Medicaid, Veterans Affairs or Medicare Advantage insurance, or by some nonprofit organizations.

Some home care companies have adopted technology to help provide consistent scheduling and care.

Jisella Dolan,

chief advocacy officer for Home Instead, which has 1,200 home-care franchises across the U.S., says the company uses a technology platform that coordinates scheduling and allows family members, using a downloaded app, to see who is coming each day, when, and if there are any changes.

Home Instead, which is a subsidiary of Honor Technology Inc., doesn’t guarantee it will find replacements if a scheduled worker isn’t available, but it strives to do so, she says. The company no longer has the waiting list for services that it did last year during the height of Omicron infections, she says.

Extra training

Home Instead also has training for those working with clients who have special conditions such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease.

Routine and regularity are especially important for those with Alzheimer’s, says

Amy Goyer,

the family caregiving expert at AARP, who cared for and managed paid caregivers for her parents, including a father with Alzheimer’s, before they died.

“Every time you get a new paid caregiver, you have to train them,” she says. “ ‘This is what time my parents get out of bed. This is when they eat breakfast and lunch. These are the clothes my dad wears, the TV shows he watches and the music he listens to.’ ”

She advises families to have at least two caregivers, each with a different shift so one can fill in when the other can’t work, and to keep a checklist of daily routines with tasks and times listed for showers, meals, medications and getting in and out of bed, so those coming in on short notice know what to do. Families that can afford it can also hire a geriatric care manager to coordinate care and find backups, which is especially helpful if family members live out of town.

Ms. Espinosa, who was referred by the local ALS chapter, preps meals for Ms. Barket.

Frances Copeland says she had 10 caregivers in a 15-month-period between 2021 and 2022 for her 91-year-old mother, with the longest lasting eight months. “We had an occasion where two caregivers showed up and they stood outside arguing about whose day it was to be there,” she says.

Ms. Copeland, who is a certified nursing assistant and has been a caregiver for others, understands why some quit. “The pay isn’t great, and the clients can be demanding and critical,” she says. She recalls driving 45 minutes to one client’s house and being told to turn around and go back because she wasn’t needed that day.

Not all home healthcare agencies are comfortable working with people who have ALS or Alzheimer’s because of their advanced needs, says Jessie Meier, a social worker with the ALS Association Greater Philadelphia Chapter.

“The care is so personal and deeply intimate. You are helping a person shower, bathe and toilet,” she says, which makes familiarity even more important.

Ms. Barket, the widow, who lives in Bethlehem Township, Pa., says her family is small and distant. One brother lives in North Carolina and an aunt lives more than an hour away. Her daughter lives closer but has mental-health challenges and is unable to help with care.

Ms. Barket relies on caregivers from one agency, who come three hours a day, five days a week. Another caregiver, referred to her by the ALS Association, comes on a sixth day for three hours. The caregivers assemble meals in takeout containers, the lids laying across the top because she can’t get them off. She can’t carry a plate.

“My hands and wrists are too unstable at this point,” she says. If something falls to the floor, she tries to use a hangar to get it up to her. “I try to MacGyver everything,” she says. Unable to open drawers, she keeps clothes in a basket.

Each time a new caregiver arrives, she asks them if they know anything about ALS. If they don’t she tells them to Google it, so they understand her limitations. “I can’t fault caregivers, who are doing their best,” she says. “Ninety-five percent of them are wonderful.”

The unpredictability, though, is frightening, especially since her disease is progressive. On the recent Saturday when the caregiver couldn’t come, she says she had the “wherewithal” to call a friend who brought meals.

“Down the road, I won’t be able to speak,” she says. “Then what? It’s very scary at times.”

Ms. Barket says she has had seven different caregivers come through her home in the past six months.

Write to Clare Ansberry at clare.ansberry@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Putin Faces ‘Most Precarious Moment’ of His Decades in Power: Russia Expert

  • Putin faces the “most precarious moment” of his time in power, Angela Stent told Insider.
  • Stent, a top Russia expert, said Putin’s grip on power has slipped because of Russia’s mounting failures in Ukraine.
  • The Russian army appears “incompetent,” Stent said, and the situation “looks bad” for Putin.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has ruled over his country with an iron fist for more than two decades, brutally cracking down on dissent while cementing his control over the levers of power in Russia. Those who’ve opposed the Russian leader have often landed behind bars or wound up dead. But Russia’s mounting failures in Ukraine have presented novel challenges to Putin’s authority.

Angela Stent, a top Russia expert who served in the Office of Policy Planning at the State Department from 1999 to 2001 and as a national intelligence officer for Russia and Eurasia at the National Intelligence Council from 2004 to 2006, told Insider that “his grip on power is clearly not as strong as it was on February 23,” the day before Putin launched Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine.

The war hasn’t gone Putin’s way. The Pentagon said in August that Russian casualties could be as high as 80,000, and that number has likely risen in recent months. In an effort to address Russia’s manpower problems, Putin recently announced a partial military mobilization, as well as various stop-loss measures, but things are not going well. There’s been local resistance to the draft, and tens of thousands of Russians have fled the country. 

Putin also announced the annexation of four Ukrainian regions last week, despite the fact that Russia does not fully control or occupy these regions. In the time since, Ukrainian forces have recaptured territory in these areas. Recent reporting suggests that even members of Putin’s inner circle have begun to openly criticize the botched invasion, an action that can be dangerous and even deadly.  

The Russian army appears “incompetent,” Stent said, and the situation “looks bad” for Putin. “This is definitely the most precarious moment” in Putin’s 22 years in power, she said, adding that what is happening is entirely “self-inflicted.”

“He didn’t have to go in and invade Ukraine in February, but obviously he made the decision that this was the right time to do it,” Stent, now a Georgetown professor and senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, said. 

Even though the war hasn’t gone as planned for the Russian leader, that does not necessarily mean Putin’s downfall is imminent. “He still projects the image of someone who’s self-confident,” Stent said, pointing to Putin’s “fiery” speech on the annexations.

And there hasn’t been a mass public uprising against Putin, showing how effective his efforts to quash dissent have been. Putin’s most prominent critic, Alexey Navalny, is imprisoned on charges widely decried as politically motivated. Protesting the war could mean prison time for some Russians, and Putin signed a vague law criminalizing spreading so-called “fake news” about the military shortly after the invasion began.

“The problem is Putin has created the system with increasing repression,” Stent said, “It’s a huge disincentive to protest.”

“There’s no one single individual or even small group of individuals who would mobilize people,” she added, “In Russia if you want to have change, it has to happen in Moscow and probably St. Petersburg, and you just haven’t seen the willingness to galvanize people.” 

Stent also said that the recent decision by the OPEC+ alliance to significantly cut oil production at a time when Russia’s war in Ukraine is causing an energy crisis seems to point to Putin’s ongoing geopolitical influence. The Saudis and other members of the coalition are essentially “supporting Putin’s war effort,” Stent said. “Even though his situation doesn’t look good, there a large number of countries all around the world that still support Russia.”

But there are also signs that countries like India and China, which tend to side with Moscow on the global stage but haven’t taken an overtly supportive stance with regard to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, are “wary” about what Putin is doing, Stent said.

Last month, Putin acknowledged that both countries have concerns about the war in Ukraine as he met with Chinese leader Xi Jinping and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at a summit in Uzbekistan. Modi criticized the conflict directly to Putin’s face, stating, “Today’s era is not an era of war, and I have spoken to you on the phone about this.”

Putin’s repeated nuclear threats since the war began likely “mitigates” the possibility of such countries offering full-throated support for Russia’s war in Ukraine, Stent said. 

‘The nuclear threats are not helping Putin’

A Russian nuclear missile rolls along Red Square during the military parade marking the 75th anniversary of Nazi defeat, on June 24, 2020 in Moscow, Russia.

Mikhail Svetlov/Getty Images



With Russia struggling in Ukraine and Putin facing perhaps the worst predicament of his time in power, many leaders, officials, Russia watchers, and military experts in Ukraine and in the West have expressed concerns that the Russian leader might resort to the use of nuclear weapons. 

In late September, national security advisor Jake Sullivan said the US has privately communicated to Russia that there would be “catastrophic consequences” if nuclear weapons are used. 

A number of analysts have suggested that Putin’s nuclear threats are largely a bluff designed to intimidate the West and push it away from continuing support for Kyiv. The US has provided Ukraine with billions in security aid, including weapons that have played a key role on the battlefield.

If this is Putin’s goal, it’s not working, Stent said, adding that “the nuclear threats are not helping Putin vis-à-vis the West.”

Putin’s nuclear rhetoric should be taken “seriously,” she said, but that there has been “exaggeration of the imminent threat.”

“I don’t think anybody thinks that the use of a tactical nuclear weapon is something that’s going to happen soon,” Stent said, emphasizing that Putin wants to wait and see if the mobilization works before taking escalatory steps beyond attacks on infrastructure such as power plants and dams. 

But that doesn’t mean Putin’s nuclear threats can be entirely dismissed.

“Putin said he wasn’t bluffing, and some of our political leaders have said we have to have to take this seriously,” Stent said. “That’s why the administration is clearly communicating with the Kremlin — telling them that if they were to do something like that, there would be very serious consequences.”

Read original article here