Tag Archives: Potters

West Ham vs. Chelsea Preview: Can Potter’s club get a win? | ESPN FC – ESPN UK

  1. West Ham vs. Chelsea Preview: Can Potter’s club get a win? | ESPN FC ESPN UK
  2. West Ham United vs. Chelsea, Premier League: Preview, team news, how to watch We Ain’t Got No History
  3. “We can see his (Joao Felix) quality, see it every day” | Graham Potter Press Conference Chelsea Football Club
  4. West Ham United vs. Chelsea live stream info, TV channel: How to watch Premier League on TV, stream online CBS Sports
  5. Kovačić not ready to return while Sterling suffers ‘a little setback’ for Chelsea We Ain’t Got No History
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Fulham’s Carlos Vinícius deepens Potter’s Chelsea pain as Félix sees red | Premier League

In the minds of the optimists occupying the boardroom at Stamford Bridge, there will come a point when Chelsea will be able to look back on the night when they lost to Fulham for the first time in 17 years and laugh about the time their new signing from Atlético Madrid took it too far with his attempts to prove he was capable of handling the rough and tumble of English football.

Yet the problem with that theory, the one that involves west London’s third-best club being rewarded for allowing Graham Potter to lead them through this most awkward of transitions, is that it jars with the current reality. There is trusting the process and then there is the spectacle of Chelsea lying in 10th place.

This, even if allowances must be made for injuries, is lurching into crisis territory. By the end Chelsea had slipped six points behind Fulham and, while there were encouraging glimmers from João Félix before his debut ended in a rash red card, the fact is a squad assembled at such great expense should not be on a run of seven defeats in their last 10 games.

It is going to be a long road back for Potter. On the bright side, at least he could talk up some positives for Chelsea. There had been some flashes of the old defiance, typified by Kalidou Koulibaly lifting another rickety defensive display by smuggling in an equaliser just after half-time, and there were flashes of enterprising football.

To give Potter credit, it may well have turned out differently had Félix kept his cool instead of chopping down Kenny Tete when the game was locked at 1-1 after 58 minutes. But Chelsea lost, the 10 men cracking when Carlos Vinícius headed in the winner on 73 minutes. It was another soft concession, with Thiago Silva and Kepa Arrizabalaga both at fault, and Fulham could cherish rising into sixth place.

The gloating from Fulham’s fans, who cannot believe how well Marco Silva’s team have played since winning promotion, was tough to take. It is not supposed to be like this for Chelsea, although their demise is about more than whether it was right to replace Thomas Tuchel with Potter. After all, it was not Potter who signed Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang, who did not even make it off the bench when Chelsea were chasing a late point.

The balance is not right. Koulibaly has been a poor signing, while Marc Cucurella’s late cameo underlined why an 18-year-old, Lewis Hall, was chosen at left wing-back instead of the £62m Spaniard.

João Félix was sent off early in the second half for this foul on Fulham’s Kenny Tete. Photograph: Ben Stansall/AFP/Getty Images

Chelsea made weird choices. Koulibaly’s attempts to play out from the back were risible and a dreadful error from Trevoh Chalobah led to Bobby Decordova-Reid pinging a shot against the bar. As for Fulham’s opener in the 25th minute, it came from Hall conceding possession to Reid in a dangerous position and Chalobah failing to clear his lines. The ball fell to Willian, who evaded César Azpilicueta and saw his fizzing shot beat Arrizabalaga thanks to a deflection off Chalobah.

Willian did not celebrate deepening his old side’s misery. The sight of the Brazilian running at Azpilicueta had stirred memories of better times for Chelsea, although at least there was some hope for the future. Potter’s 3-5-2 system gave the visitors control of midfield during the early stages, there was some welcome assertiveness from Kai Havertz after his dismal showing during the defeat to Manchester City in the FA Cup and there were plenty of nice touches from Félix, who spent most of his time on the pitch floating around, dancing past defenders and creating chances.

A slender presence, Félix was not overawed by the physical challenge. The Portuguese forward is an expensive loan signing but he could be an inspired one. Félix was ready despite having had only one training session after his move from Atlético. His first involvement almost led to a goal for Hall and there was danger whenever he got on the ball.

The only disappointment is that Félix, who went close to scoring on several occasions, will be suspended for three games. His dismissal was the turning point. Chelsea had just cancelled out Willian’s goal. Hall had won a free-kick on the left, Mount had almost caught out Bernd Leno at his near post and Koulibaly had forced the ball over the line.

At that stage the momentum was with Chelsea. Fulham, who had needed Leno to deny Hall, were nervous. But nothing is going Chelsea’s way. Their injury list grew when Denis Zakaria, who was playing well in midfield, limped off. Félix’s brainless lunge soon followed.

Down to 10 men, Chelsea tried to stand firm, threatening when Havertz extended Leno. With 17 minutes left, though, Andreas Pereira’s cross flew over Silva and Arrizabalaga’s shoddy positioning was punished by Vinicius. The hardest job in football, as Potter had put it, had become even tougher.

Read original article here

Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson pay tribute to Harry Potter’s Robbie Coltrane

Robbie Coltrane, Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, and Alan Rickman at a preview for Harry Potter And The Prisoner Of Azkaban in 2004
Photo: DON EMMERT/AFP via Getty Images (Getty Images)

Robbie Coltrane died this week, ending a career that spanned decades of both comedy and drama—but which, for many, will always be synonymous with the Harry Potter film franchise, where Coltrane spent roughly a decade playing half-giant Hogwarts groundskeeper Hagrid. Now, several of Coltrane’s co-stars from the films have issued statements this weekend, remembering a man who always went out of his way to keep the young actors he worked with laughing and feeling comfortable on the films’ sets.

That includes series star Daniel Radcliffe, who gave The New York Post a statement about Coltrane, saying that, “Robbie was one of the funniest people I’ve met and used to keep us laughing constantly as kids on the set. I’ve especially fond memories of him keeping our spirits up on Prisoner Of Azkaban, when we were all hiding from the torrential rain for hours in Hagrid’s hut, and he was telling stories and cracking jokes to keep morale up. I feel incredibly lucky that I got to meet and work with him and very sad that he’s passed. He was an incredible actor and a lovely man.”

Radcliffe’s co-star Emma Watson issued a tribute of her own, with EW noting that she posted an Instagram Story in which she wrote that, “Robbie was like the most fun uncle I’ve ever had, but most of all, he was deeply caring and compassionate towards me as a child and an adult. His talent was so immense that it made sense he played a gianthe could fill ANY space with his brilliance. Robbie, if I ever get to be so kind as you were to me on a film set I promise I’ll do it in your name and memory. Know how much I adore and admire you. I’ll really miss your sweetness, your nicknames, your warmth, your laughs, and your hugs. You made us a family. Know you were that to us.”

Other Harry Potter kids sharing their memories included brothers Oliver and James Phelps, who played Fred and George Weasley: James Phelps wrote on Twitter about how “I’ll never forget in September 2000, Robbie Coltrane came over to a very nervous 14yr old me on my 1st ever day on a movie set and said ‘Enjoy it, you’ll be great’. Thank you for that.” There’s also Matthew Lewis, who played Neville Longbottom, and who reminisced about “Robbie. Bobser. He called me Space Boy. We shared a love of the final frontier. He didn’t give a fuck and it always made you smile. A giant, in more ways than one. We had some times.”

Harry Potter Reunion – Robbie Coltrane: “I’ll Not be here… but Hagrid will”

Amidst the other tributes this week, fans have also been passing around a moment from the recent Harry Potter reunion special, where Coltrane himself reflected on the films’ legacy. “My children will show them to their children, so you could be watching in 50 years times—easy,” he said, alternating between sincerity and laughter in his typical style.I’ll not be here, sadly. But Hagrid will.”



Read original article here

Jon Stewart Clarifies His Comments on Anti-Semitic Depiction of Harry Potter’s Goblins [Update]

Update 1/5 12:11 pm PT: Jon Stewart has pushed back against headlines that suggested he was accusing Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling of being antisemitic over the depiction of goblins in the Harry Potter movies. A day after a video clip of Stewart talking about Harry Potter went viral, Stewart issued a video clarification on his podcast, “The Problem.”

“There is no reasonable person that could’ve watched it and not seen it as a light-hearted conversation amongst colleagues and chums, having a larf, enjoying ourselves about Harry Potter and about my experience watching it for the first time as a Jewish guy. And how some tropes are so embedded in society that they’re basically invisible, even in a considered process like movie-making.”

Stewart reiterated “I cannot stress this enough. I am not accusing J.K. Rowling of being antisemitic.” You can watch Stewart’s full clarification above as well as the discussion on Harry Potter below.

Original Story: Jon Stewart has accused J.K. Rowling of including anti-Semitic depictions in her books (and subsequent movies), regarding the Goblins which run Gringotts Bank in the Harry Potter universe.

During a recent episode of his podcast, The Problem with Jon Stewart, the host stated that he believes the Goblins presented in Harry Potter’s world amount to Jewish ‘caricatures’.

“It’s a wizarding world,” he said. “The train station has a half a thing, and no one can see it, and we can ride dragons and you’ve got a pet owl… Who should run the bank? Jews.”

Stewart claims that Rowling actively perpetuates Jewish stereotypes by characterising the Goblins as ‘caricatures’ of Jewish people. “Yeah, they look like Jews,” he said. “But what if their teeth were sharper?”

His argument is that the Goblins bear more than a passing similarity to illustrations in the anti-Semitic text, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. “I just want to show you a caricature,” he said. “And they’re like, ‘Oh, look at that, that’s from Harry Potter!’ And you’re like, ‘No, that’s a caricature of a Jew from an anti-Semitic piece of literature.’”

The problem with characterisations such as this is that they perpetuate anti-Semitic stereotypes by making them almost acceptable. And that’s something Stewart believes has already happened here.

“I was expecting the crowd to be like, ‘Holy shit, she did not, in a wizarding world, just throw Jews in there to run the f**king underground bank,’” he said. “And everybody was just like, ‘Wizards.’”

The 25 Best Harry Potter Characters

At time of writing J.K. Rowling has not yet responded publicly to Stewart’s comments. The author has come under fire in recent years due to what many see as her anti-transgender views, and did not appear as part of the recent Harry Potter 20th Anniversary special, aside from in-archive footage.

Ryan Leston is an entertainment journalist and film critic for IGN. You can follow him on Twitter.



Read original article here

Jury in Kim Potter’s manslaughter trial for killing Daunte Wright completes day 3 of deliberations

They had returned to work Wednesday after asking what they should do if they can’t reach a verdict — and have deliberated about 24 hours over three days.

The jury weighing the fate of Kim Potter for the fatal shooting of the 20-year-old Black deliberated just over nine hours Tuesday and more than five hours the day before.

One of two jury questions Tuesday suggested jurors could be having trouble agreeing on a verdict: “If the jury cannot reach consensus, what is the guidance around how long and what steps should be taken?”

Judge Regina Chu sent them back to the jury room after rereading an earlier instruction that they “deliberate with a view toward reaching agreement if you can do so without violating your individual judgment.”

The sequestered jury also asked the court that zip ties securing the weapon to an evidence box be removed so the handgun can be held during deliberations.

Chu allowed the zip ties to be removed so jurors can handle the gun, which she said is not loaded and is fully secured.

Potter, 49, has pleaded not guilty to charges of first-degree and second-degree manslaughter.

Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, a former defense attorney and mayor of Baltimore, told CNN on Tuesday night the jury questions suggested “pretty strong opinions on both sides.”

“I think right now they are saying, can this be an accident? Or must it be negligence for an officer to mistake or confuse a gun — a handgun — with a Taser?” Rawlings-Blake said.

“And that’s why I think they are holding it. I think they are really grappling with that and trying to come up with a decision that they can stick with for the rest of their lives.”

The trial stems from the fatal shooting of Wright in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, after police pulled him over for an expired tag and an illegal air freshener. During the stop, officers learned he had an outstanding warrant and attempted to arrest him, but Wright pulled away and tried to drive off.

As video of the incident shows, Potter yelled “Taser” repeatedly before she shot Wright with her handgun. She then said, “Holy sh*t! I just shot him!” She added: “I grabbed the wrong f**king gun, and I shot him.” She resigned from the department days later.

The case centers on the jury’s interpretation of Potter’s fatal error — was it, as the prosecution argued, due to her recklessness and negligence? Or was it an unfortunate accident that does not rise to the level of a crime, as the defense has argued?

More than 30 witnesses, including Potter herself, took the stand during the trial’s eight days of testimony. An emotional Potter testified for hours and broke down in tears several times as she described the “chaotic” moments that led up to the shooting.

“I was very distraught. I just shot somebody. I’m sorry it happened,” she said, crying, in court. “I’m so sorry.”

Under cross-examination, Potter said Wright had not threatened the officers before she fired. She said she did not remember much of what happened after the shooting but acknowledged she did not help treat Wright’s injuries or check on her fellow officers.

Potter was far from a rogue officer. She testified that before that day she had never deployed her Taser or fired a handgun while on duty, and she had never had a complaint against her.

In her closing argument, Assistant Minnesota Attorney General Erin Eldridge said Potter made a series of bad choices during the traffic stop that led to the fatal mix-up.

“Accidents can still be crimes if they occur because of recklessness or culpable negligence,” the prosecutor said. “It’s not a defense to the crimes charged.”

The defense has characterized the killing as an unfortunate accident that should not be considered a crime.

“Everybody makes mistakes, nobody’s perfect,” said attorney Earl Gray. “This lady made a mistake and a mistake is not a crime.”

He also argued Potter was within her rights to use deadly force to protect a fellow officer, who was reaching into the vehicle when Wright attempted to drive away.

“Even though she didn’t know she was using it, she had the right to, and that’s what the law is,” he said.

CNN’s Eric Levenson, Ashley Killough, Carma Hassan, Brad Parks and Anna-Maja Rappard contributed to this report.

Read original article here

Prosecutors say Kim Potter’s ‘colossal screw-up’ led to death of Daunte Wright, jury begins deliberating

A prosecutor on Monday urged jurors to hold a former Minnesota police officer criminally responsible for a “colossal screw-up, a blunder of epic proportions” that ended in the fatal shooting of a Black motorist.

Assistant Attorney General Erin Eldridge said defendant Kim Potter, a former Brooklyn Center police officer, improperly disregarded a series of risks when she drew her service weapon, shot and killed Daunte Wright this year.

Potter, who is white, has said she accidentally pulled a Glock when she was trying to deploy a Taser to subdue Wright, who was fleeing from arrest on a misdemeanor weapons warrant.

But Eldridge insisted that Potter shouldn’t have even used a Taser on Wright, who was mortally wounded and drove a short distance before slamming into another car seconds later.

“It goes to show that she made a series of bad choices that led to her shooting and killing Daunte Wright. It goes to her disregard of all the risks,” Eldridge told a Minneapolis jury.

“Members of  the jury, this was no little ‘oopsies.’ This was not putting the wrong date on a check. This was not entering the wrong password somewhere. This was a colossal screw-up, a blunder of epic proportions. It was precisely the thing she had been warned about for years and she was trained to prevent it. It was irreversible and it was fatal.”

Potter has pleaded not guilty to first- and second-degree manslaughter charges.

A conviction on first-degree manslaughter would mean Potter improperly used “such force and violence that death of or great bodily harm to any person was reasonably foreseeable.”

The second-degree manslaughter charge alleges that Potter’s “culpable negligence” created “unreasonable risk, and consciously takes chances of causing death or great bodily harm to another.”

The charges carry a maximum sentence of 15 years and 10 years in prison, respectively.

Defense attorney Earl Gray insisted that his client can’t be criminally punished for a tragic accident, one he compared to a deadly mishap at the hands of a doctor, pilot or lawyer.

“You’ve never heard of a doctor being charged with making a mistake and we know (that) common sense and history tells you they’ve made many and many have caused death. Many have caused serious injuries,” he told jurors.

Eldridge played Potter’s body-camera video in slow motion for jurors, saying it showed that the defendant most likely saw her weapon before firing it.

“She took specific actions that put Daunte Wright and everyone else around him at risk,” the prosecutor said. “An ordinary and prudent person would not have drawn a weapon, held it for more than five … six seconds, aimed it and pulled the trigger, all without recognizing or confirming what was in their hand.”

Gray lashed out at the prosecution’s use of Potter’s body-camera footage, arguing that it was played in slow motion, frame-by-frame, making for a distorted picture of events. 

“Playing the video, not at the right speed where it showed chaos, playing it as slow as possible, that’s the rabbit hole of misdirection,” Gray told jurors.

“So when you go into that jury room, play it like it’s supposed to be played, not a rabbit hole of misdirection.” 

The defense insisted that Wright, and not Potter, is really the one responsible for the fatal interaction.

“The state argues Daunte Wright had nothing to do with his death which is absurd,” Gray said.

Once Wright tried to flee, the police had no choice but to stop him, the defense said.

“That’s the cause, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, that’s what caused this whole incident,” Gray said. “If he would have gone with the officers … go take a ride downtown and it’s over.”

Wright was killed in a confrontation that unfolded about 10 miles away from the courthouse where former Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin was on trial for the slaying of George Floyd.

Days later, Chauvin, who is white, was convicted of second- and third-degree murder, as well as second-degree manslaughter, in the May 25, 2020, killing of Floyd, a Black man, whose death touched off a summer of national protests calling for an end to institutional racism.

Potter’s trial is being held in the same 18th-floor courtroom where Chauvin was tried and convicted. Potter has pleaded not guilty, claiming Wright’s killing was a tragic accident.

Wright was pulled over because of an air freshener dangling from the rear-view mirror, prosecutors said. A short time later, officers tried to arrest Wright on an outstanding warrant and a struggle ensued. Body camera video showed Potter repeatedly yelling “Taser!”

“Members of the jury, the defendant told you her sons will be home for the holidays. You know who won’t be home for the holidays is Daunte Wright,”   Eldridge said. “Daunte Wright’s parents, Katie and Aubrey Wright, will have an empty seat at their table this holiday season because the defendant shot and killed him on April 11 of this year.”

The prosecutor added: “At the heart of it, this case is very simple, members of the jury. It’s a case about the defendant’s reckless handling of her firearm and it’s about her culpable negligence.” 

The jury of nine white people, one African American and two Asian Americans began deliberations Monday afternoon.

Just before the panel retired to its deliberation room, another prosecutor, Assistant Attorney General Matthew Frank, urged jurors to disregard defense claims that Potter simply made a tragic mistake.

“There’s no mistake defense. You will not see an instruction on the defense of mistake,” Frank told jurors. “The judge will not give you an instruction that says a person is not guilty if they commit a mistake. That’s not the law no matter how often the defense says ‘mistake.’”  

Read original article here