Tag Archives: Ponzi

Future of the internet or a ‘Ponzi scheme’ — what exactly is Web3?

Some call it the next phase of the internet. Some say it’s a fast-money scam that’ll fall apart. But what exactly is Web3?

The phrase “Web3” is used broadly to refer to a new-era internet that will run on the record-keeping technology blockchain, a decentralized public accounting system. The current iteration of the internet, Web2, by comparison, runs on centralized, company-owned servers.

WHAT IS IT?

Web3 “offers a read/write/own version of the web, in which users have a financial stake in and more control over the web communities they belong to” by enabling users to own their data, according to the Harvard Business Review. 

Investors hope this version of the internet will lead to a democratization of data on the web, where transactions and contracts can be double-checked by all users. However, consumers should be skeptical, according to venture capitalist Joe Lonsdale, as mainstream products have yet to materialize despite heavy cash investments.

WATCH PALANTIR CO-FOUNDER JOE LONSDALE EXPLAIN WHY HE FEELS WEB3 IS A ‘PONZI SCHEME’:

WATCH MORE FOX NEWS DIGITAL ORIGINALS HERE

“A lot of what people are calling Web3 was a Ponzi scheme, and it made no sense whatsoever,” the Palantir co-founder previously told Fox News. “That said, the protocols to have decentralized ownership are very interesting.”

Decentralization, a key feature of blockchain, distributes the responsibilities of key internet functions such as server control, transaction confirmation, and time stamping to a network of users rather than traditional methods where all operations would be handled by one company or organization. Where something like Amazon Web Services’ servers hosted nearly 30% of the internet in 2020, Web3 promises to distribute that responsibility among users, fundamentally changing online interactions. 

Decentralized digital infrastructure — such as cryptocurrency like Bitcoin and non-fungible tokens (NFTs) — are designed to be key components of Web3 and would be necessary for its function. 

Joe Lonsdale, co-founder of Palantir, believes crypto still has a strong future despite the industry facing a string of company collapses.
(Fox News Digital/Jon Michael Raasch)

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

“Longer term, it does make sense to have more decentralized power and for something like Bitcoin to exist,” Lonsdale said in a previous interview. Bitcoin “allows more kind of liberty for the financial system from really bad-acting governments.”

STUART VARNEY: SAM BANKMAN-FRIED’S ‘APOLOGY TOUR’ IS NOT STOPPING THE IMPLOSION OF CRYPTO INFRASTRUCTURE

Elon Musk, meanwhile, has expressed skepticism of Web3.

“I’m not suggesting web3 is real – seems more marketing buzzword than reality right now,” the Tesla chief tweeted last year.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Twitter Founder Jack Dorsey has also questioned the new-era internet.

Users “don’t own ‘web3,’” he tweeted last December, throwing cold water on the notion that users will be able to monetize their data online.

Dorsey has been working on a competitor to Web3, which claims on its website to be “an extra decentralized web platform.” 

To watch the full interview with Lonsdale on Web3, click here.

Bradford Betz contributed to this report.



Read original article here

Most crypto companies will ‘crash’ after years of industry Ponzi schemes: Palantir co-founder

More crypto companies are going to fall to Ponzi scheme-style bankruptcy, but cryptocurrency will remain a crucial tool for exchange funds globally, a venture capitalist told Fox News.

“Overall, I think you’re going to have most things crash,” said Joe Lonsdale, an investor and a co-founder of software company Palantir. Various crypto lenders, crypto tokens and other parts of the ecosystem were “a Ponzi scheme, and it made no sense whatsoever.”

“This is what you’d expect in any situation where you have stuff that’s not regulated,” he added. 

WATCH PALANTIR CO-FOUNDER PREDICT THE FUTURE OF CRYPTO EXCHANGES: 

WATCH MORE FOX NEWS DIGITAL ORIGINALS HERE

Over the last several years, crypto projects have been “valued not based on cash flows, not based on creating value in the economy, but based on what people would pay for it,” Lonsdale said.

FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried is facing an onslaught of legal repercussions over his involvement in the collapse of FTX.
(Jeenah Moon/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

FTX, a Bahamas-based crypto exchange, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in early November after reportedly losing at least $1 billion. 

Another large crypto company, BlockFi, also announced its bankruptcy last week, following other crypto companies like Celsius Network and Voyager Digital into Chapter 11 proceedings. 

TROUBLED CRYPTO BOSS SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, WHO LOST $15B IN A WEEK, FUNNELED MILLIONS TO DEMS, FAR-LEFT CAUSES

Some companies that have declared bankruptcy “have had a lot of corruption,” Lonsdale said, though he only named FTX. “Long term, there’s a good part of crypto, but most of what we saw in crypto the last three, four, five years was a speculative bubble driven by cheap money and driven by a lot of these Ponzi schemes.”

Joe Lonsdale, co-founder of Palantir, believes crypto still has a strong future despite the industry facing a string of company collapses.
(Fox News Digital/Jon Michael Raasch)

Despite the recent turmoil in cryptocurrency markets, crypto-based technologies will continue developing more capabilities, according to Lonsdale. Blockchain technology used in cryptocurrencies allows funds to be transferred online without using traditional government or bank infrastructure, enabling a new and important way to move money globally, Lonsdale said. 

“It does make sense to have more decentralized power and for something like Bitcoin to exist,” he said. “It’s helped people get money out of Russia, out of Venezuela, out of China.”

“It allows more kind of liberty for the financial system from really bad-acting governments,” Lonsdale continued. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Blockchain technology will still be an important part of the future, the venture capitalist said. 

“This ecosystem, long term, I think you will have some of this stuff emerge as useful for the world,” he said. “But that’s not all we’re seeing right now.”

To watch the full interview with Joe Lonsdale on the future of crypto, click here. 

Read original article here

Bill O’Reilly and Lawrence Taylor Endorsed a Real Estate Investment Firm the Feds Say Is a Ponzi Scheme

For years, National Realty Investment Advisors promised their clients an easy way to get rich. And they had bold-faced names like Bill O’Reilly and Lawrence Taylor making their case.

After investing a few thousand dollars, the New Jersey-based group focused on high-end real estate in gentrifying neighborhoods claimed, clients might see returns of at least 12 percent. The message was repeated in thousands of emails, on huge billboards at the Lincoln and Holland tunnel, and even radio ads featuring the former Fox News host and ex-NFL star.

But on Thursday, prosecutors alleged that the investment company’s president and an associate were in fact participating in a brazen $650 million Ponzi scheme that defrauded thousands of investors.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office in New Jersey announced an 18-count indictment, including charges of securities and wire fraud, against Thomas Nicholas Salzano and Rey E. Grabato II for their role in the almost four-year-long alleged scheme. The pair also allegedly tried to evade $26 million in taxes.

Salzano was also charged with aggravated identity theft, tax evasion, and subscribing to false tax returns. Prosecutors said he was arrested on Wednesday, while Grabato was on the lam. Lawyers for Salzano did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Neither O’Reilly nor Taylor—nor any other celebrity endorser—was charged with any offenses, and prosecutors did not indicate one way or the other whether they were aware of the firm’s alleged web of deceit. Neither immediately responded to requests for comment.

The Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday also charged NRIA and four of its former executives—including Salzano and Grabato—with bilking 2,000 investors by falsely promising to use their money to buy and develop real estate properties. The group solicited investigators with promises of returns “of up to 20 percent.”

“Among the investors were 382 retirees who contributed more than $94.8 million from retirement accounts,” the SEC complaint states.

The SEC says that in reality, the group used the money “to pay distributions to other investors, to fund an executive’s family’s personal and luxury purchases, and to pay reputation management firms to thwart investors’ due diligence of the executives.” The federal indictment says the money was also used to pay for high-end cars, at least one week-long trip to the Jersey shore that included a banquet and hotel rooms for a dozen friends and family, and to pay Salzano’s wife at least $3,000 a week for a no-show job.

“These defendants schemed to create a high-pressure, fraudulent marketing campaign to hoodwink investors into believing that their bogus real estate venture generated substantial profits,” U.S. Attorney Philip Sellinger said in a press release announcing the charges. “In reality, their criminal tactics were straight out of the Ponzi scheme playbook so that they could cheat their investors and line their own pockets.”

The indictment against Salzano and Grabato marks the latest episode in the spectacular collapse of a seemingly successful real estate investment firm—albeit one that had attracted skepticism from news outlets in multiple states. Arthur Scutaro, the firm’s former head of sales, who was also charged by the SEC, pleaded guilty on Thursday to one count of conspiracy to commit securities fraud in the alleged Ponzi scheme. An attorney for Scutaro could not be immediately reached. Last year, Salzano was arrested by the FBI after an hours-long police standoff, and the firm filed for bankruptcy in June before being shut down by the state of New Jersey.

Prosecutors say that the scheme began in February 2018, when NRIA formed the investment fund “that purportedly acquired equity interests in limited liability companies that invested in real estate assets.” The SEC complaint notes that the fund owned properties in New York, New Jersey, Florida, and Pennsylvania.

“As part of their investments, the Fund provided investors with monthly distributions, typically between six percent and ten percent of their original principal investment on an annual basis, through a direct transfer to their bank accounts,” the indictment states. “Each investor in the Fund also received a written guarantee from NRIA of an annual return of at least twelve percent per year for a period of five years plus a full return of their investment, or else any shortfall would be paid by NRIA.”

To market the fund, Scutaro and Salzano allegedly used an “aggressive multi-year nationwide marketing campaign that involved thousands of emails to investors; advertisements on billboards, television, and radio; and meetings and presentations to investors.” While the marketing deemed the fund solvent, the indictment states that in reality NRIA “generated little to no profits and operated as a Ponzi scheme, which was kept afloat by new Fund investors.”

Prosecutors went on to say that Salzano, who operated as NRIA’s “shadow chief executive officer,” was the “guiding force” of the company and “concealed his managerial role… to avoid scrutiny from investors and the IRS.” One main reason he wanted to avoid detection, the indictment claims, was his ugly history—which included Federal Trade Commission charges in 2006.

Those charges alleged he defrauded non-profits, churches, and small businesses when he was the chief managing officer of a New Jersey telecommunications company. Seven years later, Salzano pleaded guilty to theft by fraud in Louisiana for defrauding small businesses in that state by “falsely promising consumers that they would receive cost savings on telecommunications services.” (The FTC case was settled in 2006 and the Louisiana charges were later expunged.)

To conceal Salzano’s past, prosecutors allege that he used Grabato, who was the president of NRIA, as the public face of the company, having him sign all bank accounts used with NRIA and documents issued to investors. As the scheme grew, prosecutors allege, the pair began to orchestrate a separate conspiracy to defraud the IRS to conceal the millions that Salzano owed to the IRS. This allegedly involved the pair lying to the government, using several bank accounts for fake entities, and even falsifying company documents.

Eventually, prosecutors say, some duped investors began to demand documentation about the supposedly bulletproof investment scheme. In response to one of those demands, Salzano allegedly sent a client a forged letter about an investment property in North Bergen, New Jersey. The letter ultimately ended up in the hands of the FBI—leading to Salzano’s arrest in 2021.

But if a top dog getting popped might have amounted to a hint his colleagues should play nice, prosecutors say, Grabato did not get the memo.

“Following Salzano’s arrest, Grabato continued to divert at least approximately $1.4 million from Fund investors to Salzano and other family members and friends of Salzano through a web of shell companies and nominee accounts,” the indictment says.

Read original article here

Florida’s ‘Mother Teresa’ Johanna Garcia accused of Ponzi scheme

A South Florida woman known as “Mother Theresa” in her community has been accused of running her business as a lucrative Ponzi scheme that scammed close to $200 million.

Johanna M. Garcia, of North Lauderdale, allegedly defrauded over 15,400 investors of up to $196 million through her company, MJ Capital Funding LLC, NPR reported Tuesday.

Founded in 2020, MJ Capital pledged to connect investors with small businesses through “merchant cash advance,” or MCA. 

Described as a “hardworking woman that has her priorities in line” in her company bio, Garcia boasted of being a down-to-earth businesswoman who helped regular people generate wealth — she was even “referred to as ‘Mother Theresa’ [sic] in her community.”

The ruse started to fall apart in April 2021, when a website emerged accusing MJ Capital of running a Ponzi scheme.

Garcia sued the anonymous whistleblower for defamation and continued to collect money from investors through August 2021, when the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a formal complaint against the company.

Johanna M. Garcia allegedly defrauded investors of nearly $200 million.
Internet Archive

In the document dated Aug. 9, the SEC alleges that MJ Capital used investors’ cash to fund “outside annualized ‘returns’ of 120%-180%,” while company higher-ups squirreled away investments for personal excursions and luxury goods.

In addition to using new injections of money to satisfy existing investors, the SEC claims that MJ Capital used unlicensed brokers and sales agents to sell unregistered securities.

A federal judge responded to the filing by freezing Garcia’s corporate assets and ordering them into receivership.  

While Garcia awaits further investigation, the case against MJ Capital got new fodder last Tuesday, when the SEC filed a second complaint against Pavel Ruiz, a company board member. 

The SEC argues that Ruiz, 29, played a “significant role in perpetuating the Ponzi scheme.”

Armed with a team of around 70 sales agents, Ruiz allegedly defrauded over 5,100 investors of at least $46 million, $7.7 million of which he diverted into his personal accounts.

According to the SEC, Ruiz used some of the pocketed money to purchase a luxury car and crypto assets.  

The same day as the SEC complaint was released, the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida charged Ruiz with conspiring to commit wire fraud.

It is unclear if Garcia, who was not named in the federal case, will face similar charges as well.

If convicted, Ruiz faces up to 20 years in prison. 

As of last week, both Garcia and Ruiz had reached partial settlements with the SEC, delaying monetary penalties until the conclusion of any criminal proceedings.

Ruiz is currently free on $250,000 bond.

The MJ Capital scandal is merely the latest in a disturbing string of similar cases, some of which saw investors scammed out of hundreds of millions of dollars.

In March this year, The Post reported on the crackdown on a $300 million Ponzi scheme that ended with FBI gunfire in Las Vegas. Just last month, the SEC filed a complaint against 11 people for their roles in an elaborate crypto pyramid scheme that targeted retail investors.

Read original article here

Efforts to keep energy costs down are like a Ponzi scheme, says Brouillette

Some of the measures that European governments have taken to keep electricity costs down can be described as a “Ponzi scheme,” said Dan Brouillette, who served as energy secretary under the Trump administration.

“One of the easiest policy levers if you will, is that you can pass a bill, appropriate money and give money to citizens to pay their electricity bills,” Brouilette told CNBC’s Hadley Gamble on the sidelines of the Gastech conference in Milan on Monday.

Brouillette warned of the “inflationary impact” of such measures should governments employ such policies to tackle the spike in prices.

When asked about whether such measures resemble a Ponzi scheme, Brouillette replied, “You could describe it that way. There’s no question about that.”

“It alleviates the immediate pain of not being able to pay the electricity bill, but the money just moves in a circle … It just goes from the consumer to the electricity company … it’s not a long-term solution,” he added.

The EU countries’ energy ministers will meet on Friday to discuss methods to curb surging gas prices.

Europe’s gas prices jumped 30% higher on Monday after Russia announced that its main gas supply pipeline would remain shut indefinitely. Europe in recent months endured a sharp drop in gas exports from Russia, traditionally its largest energy supplier.

‘Produce more’

The former energy secretary said consumers can expect higher energy prices in the near term.

Oil markets around the world are “very tight,” and more oil is going to be used for heating and other purposes as winter approaches, said Brouillette. The prospect of an energy squeeze comes as Saudi Arabia hints at cutting its oil output.

The answer to alleviating the scarcity is to “produce more,” said Brouillette.

“If we can produce more, create more infrastructure development in the United States, in Europe — that is the ultimate answer to the questions.” He said it’s important that United States return to pre-pandemic levels of production.

“We are still roughly … a million and a half barrels short per day of what we were producing just two and a half, three years ago. So I think it’s very important that we get back to that number.”

Joseph McMonigle, secretary-general of the International Energy Forum, also said that oil supply is still lagging behind demand. “A lot of people think the gap between supply and demand is all OPEC or OPEC+ but half of that is still from U.S. producers,” he told CNBC’s “Capital Connection” on Monday.

Brouillette added that it was a “strange request by the [Biden] administration” to encourage U.S. oil producers to stop their exports and prioritize American consumers.

U.S. energy secretary Jennifer Granholm recently urged the country’s refiners to limit fuel exports, and to build fuel inventories instead.

Brouillette said such a move is “impossible,” because the oil market is in “backwardation.” Backwardation is when the current price of a commodity is trading higher than its futures price. That, according to him, means that producers have more incentive to put their product in the marketplace. He added that publicly traded companies that are in America have fiduciary responsibilities to their shareholders.

Read more about energy from CNBC Pro

Read original article here

Ponzi schemes, explained: Why investors keep falling for scams

Ironically, it is just the kind of juicy swindler story you might binge watch on those platforms: Horwitz, a 35-year-old actor who had bit roles in a handful of low-budget films over the past decade, pleaded guilty last fall to committing federal securities fraud and running an illegal operation known as a Ponzi scheme. For years, prosecutors say, Horwitz used his investors’ money to fund a lavish Hollywood lifestyle — until his scam unraveled.

In short, a Ponzi scheme is a type of financial fraud that uses money from new investors to pay off earlier ones.

The term comes from the 1920 swindler Charles Ponzi, but in recent years has become synonymous with the crimes of Bernie Madoff, the mastermind behind the largest financial fraud in history, who died in prison last year.

Although Ponzi schemes have a long history, they are far from a bygone threat, experts say. In fact, they remain a major risk to investors in an era of soaring stock markets and wild surges in newfangled assets like NFTs and cryptocurrency.

“Fraudsters really feed on times of uncertainty, financial distress, upheaval, times of change, and those are really the times that we’ve been living in the past few years,” says Kathy Bazoian Phelps, a lawyer who runs a blog about Ponzi schemes. “And of course there’s a lot of money out there people are looking to invest.

Horwitz’s case appears to check the major boxes for a Ponzi scheme: They’re typically perpetrated by (a) men who (b) promise steadily high returns with minimal risk and (c) often prey on friends and family to get the scam off the ground.

Early investors in a Ponzi scheme get rewarded with mindbogglingly large dividends — Horwitz allegedly promised returns between 25% and 45% — that propel them to tell others about the golden opportunity, which keeps new money flowing into the scam. Once the pool of new investment dries up, of course, the fraud falls apart.

A fraud is born

Prosecutors say Horwitz, who goes by the stage name Zach Avery, promised his investors — many of whom were friends — that their money would be used to buy film distribution rights that he would then license to streaming platforms for a profit.

“But, as his victims came to learn, [Horwitz] was not a successful businessman or Hollywood insider,” prosecutors said. “He just played one in real life.”

(Savage burn, prosecutors.)

Horwitz’s company “neither acquired film rights nor entered into any distribution agreements with HBO or Netflix” and he provided fake documents to his investors. HBO, like CNN, is part of WarnerMedia.

Horwitz instead routed the funds to his own accounts, shelling out $5.7 million on a house and splurging on trips to Vegas on private jets, according to a complaint filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

It’s not hard to imagine how an investor might be sucked into such a scam in the era of overnight meme stock rallies and cryptocurrency millionaires. The fear of missing out is a powerful tool for grifters.

Phelps, who wrote “The Ponzi Book: A Legal Resource for Unraveling Ponzi Schemes,” says people often rely too much on word of mouth without due diligence to determine whether an investment is legitimate. That can be especially true when it comes to schemes involving cryptocurrencies or artificial intelligence.

“All it takes is for somebody to represent that they have the proprietary algorithm that guarantees returns and that sounds pretty technical and fancy and like a sure thing,” she said. “That feels comfortable to people because somebody knows technically what they’re talking about, supposedly, and the outcome is a guaranteed return that’s much higher than something they’re going to find somewhere else.”

In fact, the SEC is particularly worried that the rise of cryptos “may entice fraudsters to lure investors into Ponzi and other schemes” in part by promising investors an opportunity to “get in on the ground floor of a growing internet phenomenon.”
The agency cited a 2013 case in which an alleged Ponzi scheme advertised a bitcoin “investment opportunity” in an online forum. Investors were promised up to 7% interest per week, and that their funds would be used for bitcoin arbitrage. Instead, the crypto funds were used to pay existing investors and exchanged into US dollars to pay the organizer’s personal expenses.

Even professional investors can fall victim to fraud, Phelps notes, but there are several ways to avoid getting taken for a ride. Step one is simply being mindful of the potential for fraud. “I’m not even sure if that crosses people’s minds at all,” she said. Beyond that, investors need to ask due diligence questions, beware of promises of guaranteed return with no risk and watch out for returns that are higher than what you’re likely to find in the marketplace.

“If you can’t really understand what the investment is after a five-minute explanation,” Phelps says, “you probably shouldn’t be investing in it.”

Read original article here

Zachary Joseph Horwitz gets 20 years in prison from HBO, Netflix ponzi scheme

An LA actor who orchestrated an elaborate Ponzi scheme that raised $650 million in bogus licensing deals with HBO and Netflix was sentenced to 20 years in federal prison.

In addition to jail time, US District Judge Mark C. Scarsi on Monday ordered Zachary Joseph Horwitz, 35, to pay about $230 million in restitution to more than 250 investors who bankrolled his business venture 1inMM Capital.

Prosecutors said Horwitz would use loans from one group of investors to repay the others, while taking millions of dollars to pay for his opulent lifestyle.

Some of his splurges include $700,000 for a celebrity interior designer to remodel his $5.7 million home in Beverlywood, Calif.

Horwitz relied on his personal relationships and “word-of-mouth” referrals to secure investors and told them he had experience in the media content distribution industry.

“Defendant Zachary Horwitz portrayed himself as a Hollywood success story,” prosecutors said in a court affidavit. “He branded himself as an industry player, who, through his company… leveraged his relationships with online streaming platforms like HBO and Netflix to sell them foreign film distribution rights at a steady premium… But, as his victims came to learn, [Horwitz] was not a successful businessman or Hollywood insider. He just played one in real life.”

Zach Avery, or Zachary Joseph Horwitz, played in Last Moment of Clarity.
Lionsgate

A federal grand jury indicted Horwitz on May 2021 with five counts of securities fraud, six counts of wire fraud and two counts of aggravated identity theft.

Horwitz also used some of the funds to finance low-budget films he appeared in, including “Gateway” and “The White Crow,” according to court documents.

Horowitz was sentenced to 20 years in federal prison.
Twitter

From March 2014 to about December 2019, the con man raised millions of dollars from investors and promised them he was using their money to buy licensing rights to hundreds of movies that would be resold to HBO, Netflix and other platforms abroad, primarily in Latin America, prosecutors said.

“Horwitz showed investors numerous fictitious documents to substantiate his claimed deals with HBO and Netflix, including numerous fake movie distribution agreements,” according to the criminal complaint.

By 2019, 1inMM Capital started defaulting on its outstanding promissory notes, which guaranteed repayment on a specified maturity date. Investors were told they would receive 25 to 45 percent returns on their investment.

When investors began to complain, prosecutors said Horwitz used the names of actual HBO and Netflix employees to send fake emails and text messages to reassure investors that their payments would be delivered since they were “on the verge” of closing distribution deals.

Read original article here

Zachary Horwitz sentenced to 20 years for multimillion-dollar Ponzi scheme

The Department of Justice said in a news release that Horowitz “raised at least $650 million with bogus claims that investor money would be used to acquire licensing rights to films that HBO and Netflix purportedly had agreed to distribute abroad.”

HBO, like CNN, is part of WarnerMedia.

In October, Horowitz pleaded guilty to a federal securities fraud charge and admitted to running the Ponzi scheme.
He received a 240 month sentence, according to Monday’s release, and must pay more than $230 million in restitution. CNN has reached out to Horwitz’s attorney for comment.
Horwitz, 35, was accused of putting some of the money in his personal accounts and using the money for purchasing a personal residence for approximately $5.7 million in cash, taking trips to Las Vegas and flying on chartered jets, according to a complaint filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Horwitz — better known by his stage name “Zach Avery” — spent the past decade acting in around a dozen mostly low-budget films, including “Trespassers” and “The White Crow,” according to his IMDb profile. He also had a minor uncredited role in “Fury,” which starred Brad Pitt.

– CNN Business’ Clare Duffy contributed to this report

Read original article here

Actor Zachary Horwitz Arrested For Film Rights Ponzi Scheme – Deadline

On Tuesday, actor Zachary Horwitz (known professionally as Zach Avery) was arrested on charges of wire fraud, as reported by the Los Angeles Times.

The FBI and SEC allege that Horwitz ran a Ponzi scheme through his company, 1inMM, which defrauded investors of $227 million.

Allegedly, Horwitz told investors that his company invested in film rights, subsequently reselling these rights to distributors like Netflix and HBO. He is said to have sold people on his scheme by showing them fake licensing and distribution agreements, featuring forged signatures. Ultimately, however, both of the above companies confirmed to the FBI that they’d never conducted business with 1nMM.

It is believed that Horwitz began receiving funds as part of the Ponzi scheme in 2015, using them to purchase a $6 million home in the Beverlywood neighborhood of Los Angeles, while repaying earlier investors.

Horwitz’s credits as an actor include low-budget features such as Trespassers and The Devil Below. His assets are currently frozen, with the charges against him carrying a maximum penalty of 20 years in jail.

According to the Times, Horwitz was released earlier today on a $1 million secured bond—but his arraignment has been scheduled for May 13.



Read original article here

Actor accused of running $227 million Ponzi scheme

A little-known Los Angeles-based actor was reportedly arrested by the FBI on Tuesday for allegedly running an enormous Ponzi scheme where he duped investors by lying about the success of his film distribution company.

Zachary Horwitz, 34, who has had roles in small films under the name Zach Avery, is accused of cheating investors out of $227 million and using most of the funds for himself, The Los Angeles Times reported, citing federal authorities.

Horwitz allegedly enticed the investors by falsely claiming his company, 1inMM Capital LLC, had film licensing deals with Netflix, HBO and other platforms, the newspaper reported.

He also told investors his company distributed 52 films in South America, Africa and Australia, according to court records obtained by the paper, and gifted his funders bottles of pricey Johnny Walker Blue Label scotch.

The actor owes investors roughly $227 million — defaulting on 160 payments to them since 2019, the report said, citing the FBI.

Zachary Horwitz falsely claimed his film distribution company had deals with Netflix, HBO and streaming services, according to The Los Angeles Times.
Twitter

He is charged with wire fraud. At his Tuesday arraignment, Horwitz was released on $1 million bond.

Read original article here